District Lines Spring 2008

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

D I S T R I C T L I N E S

  • 2008
  • XXI
  • no.
  • 3

news and views of the historic districts councilspring

vol.

HDC Annual Conference Eyes Preservation’s Role In The Future of New York City

In Ma r c h 2008, the Historic Districts neighborhoods throughout the five bor- and infrastructure concerns.

  • Council’s 14th Annual Preservation oughs were able to admire the recently
  • A group of respondents to the key-

Conference, Preservation 2030, took a restored rotunda, built on the land where note zeroed in on PlaNYC’s lack of attention to community preservation. Participants included Peg Breen, president of The New York Landmarks Conservancy; Jonathan Peters, a transportation expert from the College of Staten Island; and Anthony C. Wood, author of “Preserving New York: Winning the Right to Protect a City’s Landmarks.”
“New Yorkers need more than just water to drink and beds to sleep in,” said Mr. Wood. “New York is a city of neighborhoods, and long-term planning for the city has to take that into account.”
“Surviving the Building Boom: Urban
Neighborhoods of the Future,” brought together experts to discuss tools for pre-

HDC Director Leo Blackman, left, moderates “Surviving the Building Boom: Urban Neighborhoods of the Future,” featuring Michael Rebic, Andrew Berman and Brad Lande r .

hIstorIc dIstrIcts councIl

critical look at preservation’s role in shap- George Washington took his oath of serving the city’s historic urban neighing New York’s urban environment for office as the first president of the United borhoods while providing new housing future generations. Rather than lament- States. and services for expanding populations. ing lost battles and reacting to impend- The next day, New York City Mayor Addressing out-of-scale development in ing threats, this year’s program focused Michael Bloomberg’s PlaNYC 2030 was the Village, SoHo and the Far West Vilon establishing long-term tools and used as the basis for the Conference lage, Andrew Berman, executive direcstrategies to protect the city’s historic theme. Rohit Aggarwala, director of the tor of the Greenwich Village Society for resources before they are demolished or Mayor’s Office of Long-term Planning Historic Preservation, attributed recent fall victim to unsympathetic alterations. and Sustainability, presented the keynote loss of neighborhood character to faults
The Opening Night Reception was address outlining the major tenets of the in the community-facilities bonus. By held at Federal Hall National Memorial. Plan. PlaNYC 2030 aims to prepare the granting schools, cultural institutions Nearly 150 people turned out despite the city to accommodate an additional one and hospitals special permission to build unexpected onslaught of rain that eve- million residents over the next 20 years, beyond the dimensions typical of their ning. Once inside, preservationists from specifically emphasizing environmental corresponding zoning envelopes, Mr.

continued on page 6

to enshrine environmentally-beneficent downplays the intense community-based

Cleaner, Greener,

benchmarks in city policy, historic preser- struggle to rescue this beautiful and signifi- vation – as a strategy, tactic or even a phi- cant building from the city’s Department

Fewer Landmarks

losophy – is almost completely absent from of Education, which wanted to demolish it;
Th e o s T e n s I b l e g o a l o f PlaNYC 2030 the document. Its one appearance is under HDC honored this laudable fight in 2000 is to provide a roadmap for the future of the Housing section’s fifth initiative, “Adapt by bestowing a Grassroots Preservation New York City. If the plan is followed, that Outdated Buildings to New Uses,” which Award upon the Coalition to Save P.S. 109 future New York will be more populated solely addresses publicly-owned proper- (Teri Slater, Ray Plumey, Gwen Goodwin, and cleaner with increased transit. It will ties. The sidebar case study, “Re-imagining David Corbin). In fact, this act of preserhave fewer cars and more trees. What it P.S. 109,” is a seemingly-innocuous story vation is back-handedly blamed for creat-

  • won’t have is more landmarked areas.
  • about transforming a former public school ing blight. “But in the years following the

Despite PlaNYC’s laudable aim into artists’ housing. This tangent largely decision [to not demolish it], P.S. 109 sat

continued on page 7

Historic Districts Council

District Lines ~ Spring 2008 ~ page 2

HDC Tu r n s T h e sp o T l i g h T o n “ne i g h b o r h o o d s a T ri s k ”

Wh I l e T h e hI s T o r I c DI s T r I c T s co u n c I l

is dedicated to the preservation and enhancement of all of New York City’s historic resources—be they churches, bridges, apartment buildings or otherwise—our main focus is on districts. More than just a single building, historic districts concern an ensemble of structures, their relationships to one another and the history they tell together.
The New York City Landmarks Law defines an historic district as an area that has “special character or special historical or aesthetic interest or value [representing] one or more periods or styles of architecture” and has been designated by the Landmarks Preservation Commission.
The LPC is further mandated to pre-

hIstorIc dIstrIcts councIl

serve and protect buildings and areas “of special distinction or special historical or aesthetic interest or value” through designating and regulating landmarks and historic districts.
However, by no means are all of the Gardens was landmarked in 2007, and deserving historic neighborhoods in New Fiske Terrace/Midwood Park in March of York City landmarked.
Increasingly, the special character and extension had a favorable Public Hearing. sense of place of these areas are under dire A dozen other neighborhoods have been threat or direct assault from demolition, added to the list since its inception, out-of-scale and garish new construction and some of them, such as Brooklyn’s or unsympathetic alterations. Over the DUMBO and Crown Heights North past 15 years neighborhoods whose archi- neighborhoods, have been designated tecture and sense of place were seemingly as well. stable for decades have moved beyond simply being worthy of landmarking to by no means conclusive. Like the initial being seriously at risk. list, it strives for a balance of geography,

The west side of Bower y , between Bond and Great Jones Streets, is include in the proposed NoHo extension in Manhattan.

still cries out for landmarking. Sunnyside

When “Calendar” Is a Verb

2008. Most recently the proposed NoHo

Pr e s e r v a T I o n I s T s a r e o f T e n a c c u s e D

of speaking in tongues, using acronyms and abbreviations such as ULURP, CNE and SHPO in everyday conversation. It sometimes gets even more arcane, with constructions such as NR-eligible and NegDec making their way into meeting notes.

The “Neighborhoods at Risk” list is

But one of the most obscure terms used exclusively by New York City preservationists is “calendar.” The word itself, which is derived from the French and means a reckoning of time in which the divisions of a year are defined, is not at issue; it is the use of the word as a verb that seems odd.

Whereas landmark designation styles, date ranges and building types. One might once have been merely a worth- of the things that the chosen areas have while community goal, all too often now in common, and a primary reason for sucit is a vital ingredient in the continued cess, is an organized neighborhood pres-

  • life of a community.
  • ervation campaign behind them. HDC

In 2004, HDC launched a feature on works closely with such local groups to our Web site called “Neighborhoods at further their cause. By building awareRisk” with five threatened areas —Sunny- ness of these efforts, HDC hopes to push side Gardens, Queens; Stapleton, Staten them forward on the path to designation.

In almost every conversation about a potential landmark designation or an historic building at risk, eventually the question is raised, “Is it calendared?” This odd query is almost always followed immediately by “How can we get it calendared?,” which leads to a strategy session. This conversational turn often leaves landmark laymen somewhat at a loss – What is this “calendaring” that is being referred to? Does it have something to do with fiscal years? Or

continued on page 8

  • Island; Grand Concourse, The Bronx;
  • The threats facing our city’s historic

Fiske Terrace/Midwood Park, Brooklyn; neighborhoods are manifold, but demoliand the undesignated sections of NoHo tion is obviously the most dire. Besides the in Manhattan. The neighborhoods, one irreplaceable loss of historic architecture, from each borough, represent a range demolition can lead to new construction of dates, architectural styles and build- that is often out of scale and at odds with ing types that all speak to the history of existing buildings. While the LPC judges New York City. In the four years since its new structures on how their design, mate-

  • launch, there has been progress.
  • rials and scale harmonize with the his-

The part of Stapleton centered on toric district, no such review is required in
St. Paul’s Avenue was designated in 2004, nondesignated areas as long as zoning while the section around Harrison Street

continued on page 6

Historic Districts Council

District Lines ~ Spring 2008 ~ page 3

Addisleigh Park: Uncovering African-American History in Southeast Queens

hIstorIc dIstrIcts councIl

Clockwise, from top left: The homes of former Addisleigh Park residents Jackie Robinson; Rose Murphy and Slam Stewart; Ella Fitzgerald; James Brown and Cootie Williams; Milt Hinton; and Lena Horne.

In T h e s o u T h e a s T c o r n e r o f Qu e e n s , Together with the handsome architec- of this case helped open the neighbornot far from the bustling urban heart ture, it is obvious that on its physical hood to all.

  • of Jamaica, there is a charming, little- merits alone, Addisleigh Park warrants
  • Lured by the promise of seclusion,

known suburban-type enclave with a rich serious consideration as a potential his- quietude, space and beauty, many of the and distinctive history named Addisleigh toric district. However, the true secret newcomers were world-famous. BeginPark. With approximately 650 houses on and fascination of this neighborhood lie ning with William “Count” Basie, the ample lots with graceful, mature trees, in its social, rather than its architectural, area would eventually become home

  • the neighborhood is a hidden gem and history.
  • to notables such as Lena Horne, Ella

one definitely worthy of preservation protections.
Built when race-restricted covenants Fitzgerald, Illinois Jacquet, Jackie Robdictated the segregation of the city’s inson, James Brown, Joe Louis, Milt
Addisleigh Park was largely de- neighborhoods, Addisleigh Park even- Hinton, Roy Campanella, Cootie Wilveloped in the 1930’s as part of the tually transformed from an exclusively liams and many others. pre-World War II building boom that white neighborhood into one of New shaped large swaths of eastern Queens. York City’s premier African-American be a much-beloved home to a commuThe neighborhood lies in a rough triangle enclaves by the early 1950’s. nity of middle- and upper-middle-class between Linden Boulevard on the south, Beginning in 1946, the NAACP African-American teachers, attorneys,
Today Addisleigh Park continues to the tracks of the Long Island Rail Road sought to challenge the legality of the doctors, politicians, entrepreneurs and on the east, Sayres Avenue on the north area’s racial-ownership restrictions, other professionals.

  • and Marne Place on the west. Typical of and two years later the New York State
  • Given Addisleigh Park’s rich and

the era, the area possesses fine examples Court of Appeals handed down a deci- largely unrecognized history, the Historof English Tudor-style and neo-Colonial sion that helped overturn this offensive ic Districts Council has partnered with Revival houses, many of which are quite practice, permitting Mr. Samuel Rich- the Addisleigh Park Civic Organization sizable (some with as many as eight bed- ardson, an African-American merchant to research and document the neighborrooms). Architecturally, the buildings are from Manhattan, to purchase a house hood’s story.

  • remarkably intact with few examples of from Ms. Sophie Rubin on 177th Street
  • Generous grants from Preserve New

inappropriate alterations or teardowns. in the neighborhood. Many civic and York, a grant program of the PreservaOriginal materials such as stucco, wood trade organizations, including the Amer- tion League of New York State and the

  • siding and stone are predominant.
  • ican Veterans Committee, the American New York State Council on the Arts,

A walk along Murdock Avenue, its Jewish Congress, the National Lawyers and from the National Trust for Historic principal street, reveals a pristine and Guild and the Committee of Catholics Preservation’s Northeast Office have enattractive community. The broad, sweep- for Human Rights, submitted amicus abled HDC to hire two consultants to ing, well-manicured lawns, the charming briefs detailing the evils of segregation, study the neighborhood’s social history landscaping and the near complete lack of and although a number of affluent and as well as its physical development. fences combined lend a graciousness not notable African-Americans were already often found in similar neighborhoods. living in Addisleigh Park, the resolution
The historians are currently conduct-

continued on page 9

Historic Districts Council

District Lines ~ Spring 2008 ~ page 4

A Preservation Manifesto: TonyWood on His New Book

vI r T u a l l y e v e r y P r e s e r v a T I o n g r o u P but then I realized that the Bard Act,

Writing the book recharged my batin New York City has benefited some- which made landmarks laws possible, teries and gave me tremendous cause for how from Anthony C. Wood’s eloquence was passed in 1956. and generosity during his three-decade

career in preservation advocacy and Who was Bard anyway?

philanthropy. Wood, executive direchope. I realized how many past preservationists didn’t just assume that the political tide was against them; they never gave up. They refused to accept the inevitabil-

  • tor at the Ittleson Foundation, which
  • It turns out that Albert S. Bard was ity of losing buildings and neighborhoods

funds projects combating AIDS, foster- a lawyer and civic leader with significant that they cared about so passionately. ing mental health and improving the inherited wealth. In 1913 he proposed This year I’m chairing a yearlong initiaenvironment, spent the 1980’s working an amendment to the state constitution tive called Preservation Vision New York at the Landmarks Preservation Com- allowing the government some control City, to engage the preservation commission, the Municipal Art Society and the J. M. Kaplan Fund. He has headed or served on nonprofit boards including the Historic Districts Council, the Preservation League of New York State, Partners for Sacred Places and the New York Preservation Archive Project. His first book, “Preserving New York: Winning the Right to Protect a City’s Landmarks” (422 pp., Routledge, $45), engagingly explains how varied activists—including bluebloods, architects, artists and hippies—fought side by side from 1913 to 1965 for legislation to protect landmarks. The volume, as Mr. Wood explains in this interview, is part meant as a manifesto, inspiring preservationists to think critically about their past and future. munity in thinking about its future. It’s partly in response to Mayor Bloomberg’s PlaNYC 2030, which barely mentions preservation.
Preservation Vision began with a survey on the internet gathering information from a broad range of preservationists on such concerns as: What threats and opportunities face preservation now? Which ones might emerge in the future? How should preservationists respond? Are there approaches by other cities that we should adopt? Are government incentives for preservation needed? Will we have enough trained restoration craftspeople in the future and if not what do we do about it?

What trajectory do you think it’s on?
How did you get interested in the topic?

Anthony C. W o od

Personally, I’m interested in strategic issues, like how and when should we take
While I was working at the Land- over a building’s aesthetics, and he kept off our gloves in our battles? How can we marks Commission and the MAS— pushing for that radical concept—it was emphasize our core values while also showlearning about city government, the passed in 1956, when he was 89 years old. ing how preservation advances other social

  • threats to the Landmarks Law, the
  • goals? And such questions as what new

clashes between the real-estate commu- What other colorful characters did funding sources and incentives can we crenity and preservationists, the best ways you end up studying? to organize grassroots activism—I kept ate to advance preservation? Also during the project we’ll convene some 20 emergtrying to understand the history that I was becoming part of.
George McAneny; he was a for- ing preservation leaders at the Rockefeller mer borough president who fought for Brothers Fund’s Pocantico Conference a decade against Robert Moses to save Center to help analyze the survey results
Did you find anything about preserva- Castle Clinton. And there’s Robert C. and tease out of them an “idea bank”—

tion history?

Weinberg, a planner, architect and lec- actions that preservation needs to take to turer who especially fought for planning be a vital city force in 2030. The idea bank
In the 1980’s, I tape-recorded inter- advances and to protect Greenwich Vil- will be expanded, refined and brought back views with some major early players— lage. I kept finding these wonderful, to the preservation community for develHarmon Goldstone, Geoffrey Platt, creative, witty, often irascible individu- opment, discussion, debate and prioritizMargot Gayle—and some of them were als. The book is meant partly as a fam- ing. We’ll release a final report by the end published in Village Views (a periodical of ily history—these are our preservation of 2008. The goal is to get the preservation the Society for the Architecture of the ancestors. City). I pursued the history of preservation in my every idle moment. I realized community thinking longer-term—beyond next Tuesday’s Landmarks Commission hearing, or the next mayoral administrathere were stories that needed to be told. How did examining preservation tion. History shows that transformational I’d originally thought that everything history change your attitude toward ideas in historic preservation take years to

just dates back to Pennsylvania Station, where the field is headed now?

realize.

Historic Districts Council

District Lines ~ Spring 2008 ~ page 5

HDC Auction Highlights Little- Known Modernist Masterwork

Wh I l e ne W yo r k cI T y has achieved a

respectable record of preserving its BeauxArts GildedAge, the masterworks from the post-WWII decades are still greatly unrecognized and unprotected, which is why the Historic Districts Council hosted this year’s Auction for Advocacy at the Edgar J. Kaufmann Conference Center, designed by renowned Finnish architect Alvar Aalto. Proceeds from the April 3rd event will support the League of Preservation Voters, an HDC initiative aimed at educating

hIstorIc dIstrIcts councIl

Attendees at the Auction for Advocacy.

elected officials and candidates about pres- Street Block Association kept the atmo- sioned “Fallingwater” from Frank Lloyd ervation and development issues within sphere lively. their districts.
While enjoying panoramic views of the most important Finnish architects of
Wright. Aalto’s resulting design is typical
Alvar Aalto (1898-1976), one of the of the architect’s best work.
The space is an artistic entirety;
East River and the United Nations, guests the 20th century and a central figure in everything in it was designed and prohad the opportunity to bid on an array of International Modernism, was famous for duced by Aalto to create a harmonious items, ranging from behind-the-scenes his marriage of the naturalism of Finnish effect. Serene and light-filled, the curved tours of historic houses to original art- Romanticism with modernist ideals. The forms of ash and birch create an abstract work to a vacation at a private Puerto Rico Conference Center is the only example of forest-like sculpture of sinuous bent estate. Guest auctioneer George McNeely this master’s work in New York City and wood. Combined with blue porcelain tiles of Christie’s presided over the main event, one of only four of Mr. Aalto’s structures and modern yet humanistic lighting, the

  • and pianist Arthur Abrams of the East 12th remaining in the United States.
  • Conference Center is without a doubt an

Recommended publications
  • The Backbone of the Metropolis How the Development of Rapid Transit Determined the Becoming of the New York City Metropolis

    The Backbone of the Metropolis How the Development of Rapid Transit Determined the Becoming of the New York City Metropolis

    The Backbone of the Metropolis How the development of rapid transit determined the becoming of the New York City Metropolis. History Thesis By: Pieter Schreurs Student number: 1090526 Email: [email protected] Telephone: 31(0)6-21256096 Tutor: Prof.Dr. Franziska Bollerey Date: July 2008 Cover image: “The Subway”, by George Tooker 1950, Egg tempera on composition board, Collection of Whitney Museum of American Art Source: “Subway City; Riding the trains, reading New York”; Brooks, 1997 The Backbone of the Metropolis How the development of rapid transit determined the becoming of the New York City Metropolis. History Thesis By: Pieter Schreurs Student number: 1090526 Email: [email protected] Telephone: 31(0)6-21256096 Tutor: Prof.Dr. Franziska Bollerey Date: July 2008 Image 1: The Network of Parkways. In the 1920s and 30s Robert Moses developed and intricate network of park ways around New York City. These were designed for the Joy of driving. Source: “The Power Broker”; Caro, 1975 4 Introduction Grade separated urban rapid transit and the metropolis: knowledge of what is in between this location and the previous one. users underground and re-emerge them to completely different parts of the city, without According to James Crawford, “…Transport technology has always affected both the growth and form of cities, and each new transport mode has left its stamp on urban form. When a New York, New York: new model is adopted, existing urban areas are forced into new uses and ever new forms and new development is arranged in accordance with the demands and capabilities of the In researching the development of rapid transit systems in relation to the development new mode...“ (Crawford, 2000, p.
  • 1970 Catalog Number FEHA 1924

    1970 Catalog Number FEHA 1924

    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Finding Aid Federal Hall Memorial Associates Administrative Records, 1804 - 1970 Catalog Number FEHA 1924 National Park Service Manhattan Sites Federal Hall National Memorial Rachel M. Oleaga October 2012 This finding aid may be accessed electronically from the National Park Service Manhattan Historic Sites Archive http://www.mhsarchive.org Processing was funded by a generous donation from the Leon Levy Foundation to the National Parks of New York Harbor Conservancy. Finding Aid Federal Hall Memorial Associates Administrative Records – Catalog Number FEHA 1924 Page 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................................................... 2 COPYRIGHT AND RESTRICTIONS ................................................................................................................... 4 PROVENANCE NOTE ...................................................................................................................................... 5 HISTORICAL NOTE ......................................................................................................................................... 6 SCOPE AND CONTENT NOTE ....................................................................................................................... 10 ARRANGEMENT NOTE ................................................................................................................................. 10 SERIES
  • UC Riverside UC Riverside Electronic Theses and Dissertations

    UC Riverside UC Riverside Electronic Theses and Dissertations

    UC Riverside UC Riverside Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Saving Carnegie Hall: A Case Study of Historic Preservation in Postwar New York City Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3x19f20h Author Schmitz, Sandra Elizabeth Publication Date 2015 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE Saving Carnegie Hall: A Case Study of Historic Preservation in Postwar New York A Thesis submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Art History by Sandra Elizabeth Schmitz June 2015 Thesis Committee: Dr. Patricia Morton, Chairperson Dr. Jason Weems Dr. Catherine Gudis Copyright by Sandra Elizabeth Schmitz 2015 The Thesis of Sandra Elizabeth Schmitz is approved: Committee Chairperson University of California, Riverside Acknowledgements I would like to thank my thesis advisor, Dr. Patricia Morton, for helping me to arrive at this topic and for providing encouragement and support along the way. I’m incredibly grateful for the time she took to share her knowledgeable insight and provide thorough feedback. Committee members Dr. Jason Weems and Dr. Catherine Gudis also brought valuable depth to my project through their knowledge of American architecture, urbanism, and preservation. The department of Art History at the University of California, Riverside (UCR) made this project possible by providing me with a travel grant to conduct research in New York City. Carnegie Hall’s archivists graciously guided my research at the beginning of this project and provided more information than I could fit in this thesis. I could not have accomplished this project without the support of Stacie, Hannah, Leah, and all the friends who helped me stay grounded through the last two years of writing, editing, and talking about architecture.
  • In the Field with Extre

    In the Field with Extre

    Adventuresin the field inwith Preservationextreme conservator kent diebolt he last pitch of the climb presents a number of technical problems. the holds are fragile and Tfar apart; the incline, sheer vertical. the summit is well within reach, only a few careful moves away. this is no ordinary big-wall ascent, however. the peak in question is none other than trinity towers, just north of trinity church, a mere three blocks from ground Zero. the neo-gothic edifice is one of lower manhattan’s architectural gems and the current subject of a careful conservation and structural analysis. the collapse of the world trade center on september 11 rocked every building in the neighborhood to its very foundations and blanketed the area photos: jon reis/www.jonreis.com with pulveriZed gypsum and debris. Adventuresin the field inwith Preservationextreme conservator kent diebolt cleveland towers at princeton university st. thomas church, new york city new jersey state house rotunda, trenton chrysler building, new york city Undertaking the survey is a team led by kent diebolt, founder of vertical access, a decade-old private firm specializing in building assess- ments in extreme locations. “a british mountaineering friend from graduate school suggested i look to ropes as an ideal medium for getting around on buildings,” diebolt told ICON. “ropes are relatively inexpensive, nondestructive, and afford a level of control and maneuverability simply not available using far more below: trinity towers, new york city costly scaffolding.” Using a range of techniques derived from rock climbing, below left: st thomas church, new york city search-and-rescue, and caving, vertical access has devised ingenious meth- ods by which to move about on and within steeples, domes, and towers.
  • THE NEW-YORK HISTORICAL SOCIETY Quarterly Bulletin

    THE NEW-YORK HISTORICAL SOCIETY Quarterly Bulletin

    THE NEW-YORK HISTORICAL SOCIETY Quarterly Bulletin VOLUME XXIII JULY, 1939 NUMBER THREE POOL IN THE SOCIETY'S GARDEN WITH ANNA HYATT HUNTINGTON'S "DIANA OF THE CHASE" Gift of a Member of the Society, 1939 UBLISHED BY THE SOCIETY AND ISSUED TO MEMBERS Mew York: iyo Central Park West HOURS 0 THE ART GALLERIES AND MUSEUM Open free to the public daily except Monday. Weekdays: from 10 A.M. to 5 P.M. Sundays and holidays from 1 to 5 P.M. THE LIBRARY Open daily except Sunday from 9 A.M. to 5 P.M. Holidays: from 1 to 5 P.M. HOLIDAYS The Art Galleries, Museum, and Library are open on holidays from* 1 to 5 P.M., except on New Year's Day, July Fourth, Thanksgiving, and Christmas, when the building is closed. EGYPTIAN COLLECTIONS The Egyptian Collections of The New-York Historical Society are on exhibition daily in the Brooklyn Museum, Eastern Parkway and Washington Avenue, Brooklyn, N. Y. Open weekdays, from 10 to 5; Sundays, from 2 to 6. Free, except Mondays and Fridays. THE NEW-YORK HISTORICAL SOCIETY, 170 CENTRAL PARK WEST John Jfted OJtekes 1856-1959 T is with profound sorrow that the Society records the death in New York City on May 4, 1939, of Mr. John I Abeel Weekes, President of the Society from 1913 to April, 1939. Mr. Weekes was born at Oyster Bay, Long Island, July 24, 1856, son of John Abeel Weekes and Alice Howland Delano, his wife, and grandson of Robert Doughty Weekes, first president of the New York Stock Exchange.
  • Signature Redacted Department of Architecture August 10, 2018

    Signature Redacted Department of Architecture August 10, 2018

    Transactional Terrains: Partnerships, Bargains and the Postwar Redefinition of the Public Realm, New York City 1965-1980 by Deepa Ramaswamy M.A, Architectural Association School of Architecture, 2010 M. Arch., Virginia Tech, 2005 Submitted to the Department of Architecture in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Architecture: History and Theory of Architecture at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology September 2018 D 2018 Deepa Ramaswamy. All rights reserved. C= w The author hereby grants to MIT permission to reproduce and to distribute publicly paper and electronic copies of this thesis document in whole or in part C in any medium now known or hereafter created. Signatu ARCHIVES Author:re of Signature redacted Department of Architecture August 10, 2018 Certified Signature redacted by: Arindam Dutta Associate Professor of the History of Architecture, Dissertation Supervisor Accepted Signature redacted by: Sheila Kennedy Chair, Deptment Committee on Graduate Studies I Committee Members Chair Arindam Dutta Associate Professor of the History of Architecture, Dissertation Supervisor Readers Mark Jarzombek Professor of the History and Theory of Architecture Department of Architecture, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Reader Timothy Hyde Associate Professor of the History of Architecture Department of Architecture, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Felicity Scott Professor of Architecture Graduate School of Architecture and Planning Columbia University 3 4 Transactional Terrains: Partnerships, Bargains and the Postwar Redefinition of the Public Realm, New York City 1965-1980 by Deepa Ramaswamy Submitted to the Department of Architecture on August 23,2018 in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Architecture: History and Theory of Architecture Abstract This dissertation traces the architectural and urban history of the privatization of the public realm.
  • STEINWAY HALL, 109-113 West 57T1i Street (Aka 106-116 West 58L" Street), Manhattan

    STEINWAY HALL, 109-113 West 57T1i Street (Aka 106-116 West 58L" Street), Manhattan

    Landmarks Preservation Commission November 13, 2001, Designation List 331 LP-2100 STEINWAY HALL, 109-113 West 57t1i Street (aka 106-116 West 58l" Street), Manhattan. Built 1924-25; [Whitney] Warren & [Charles D.] Wetmore, architects; Thompson-Starrett Co., builders. Landmark Site: Borough of Manhattan Tax Map Block 1010, Lot 25. October 16, 2001 , the Landmarks Preservation Commission held a public hearing on the proposed designation as a Landmark of Steinway Hall and the proposed designation of the related Landmark Site (Item No. 3). The hearing had been duly advertised in accordance with the provisions oflaw. Eight people spoke in favor of designation, including representatives of the property's owners, Community Board 5, Municipal Art Society, American Institute of Architects' Historic Buildings Committee, and Historic Districts Council. In addition, the Commission received two letters in support of designation, including one from the New York Landmarks Conservancy. Summary The sixteen-story Steinway Hall was constructed in 1924-25 to the design of architects Warren & Wetmore for Steinway & Sons, a piano manufacturing firm that has been a dominant force in its industry since the 1860s. Founded in 1853 in New York by Heinrich E. Steinweg, Sr., the firm grew to worldwide renown and prestige through technical innovations, efficient production, business acumen, and shrewd promotion using artists' endorsements. From 1864 to 1925, Steinway's offices/showroom, and famous Steinway Hall (1866), were located near Union Square. After Carnegie Hall opened in 1891, West 57t1i Street gradually became one of the nation's leading cultural and classical music centers and the piano companies relocated uptown. It was not until 1923, however, that Steinway acquired a 57th Street site.
  • Robert Lehman Papers

    Robert Lehman Papers

    Robert Lehman papers Finding aid prepared by Larry Weimer The Robert Lehman Collection Archival Project was generously funded by the Robert Lehman Foundation, Inc. This finding aid was generated using Archivists' Toolkit on September 24, 2014 Robert Lehman Collection The Metropolitan Museum of Art 1000 Fifth Avenue New York, NY, 10028 [email protected] Robert Lehman papers Table of Contents Summary Information .......................................................................................................3 Biographical/Historical note................................................................................................4 Scope and Contents note...................................................................................................34 Arrangement note.............................................................................................................. 36 Administrative Information ............................................................................................ 37 Related Materials ............................................................................................................ 39 Controlled Access Headings............................................................................................. 41 Bibliography...................................................................................................................... 40 Collection Inventory..........................................................................................................43 Series I. General
  • Manhattan Valley a Community Vision for the Future

    Manhattan Valley a Community Vision for the Future

    MANHATTAN VALLEY A COMMUNITY VISION FOR THE FUTURE Pratt Institute City & Regional Planning 1 Programs in Sustainable Planning & Development Graduate Department of City & Regional Planning Pratt Institute Higgins Hall North Room 206 Brooklyn NY 11205 2 MANHATTAN VALLEY A COMMUNITY VISION FOR THE FUTURE Pratt Institute School of Architecture Programs in Sustainable Planning & Development Graduate Program in City and Regional Planning PLAN 656: Fundamentals of Planning Spring 2010 CONTRIBUTORS Amy Bzdak Jennifer Gardner Sara Margolis Susan Stawicki Lauren Standke Jonathan Sussman Kristen Wilke Ronald Woudstra Instructors Dr. Ayse Yonder, Pratt Institute Sideya Sherman, Senior Planner, Municipal Art Society CONTENTS The Study 07 Introduction 09 History 12 Community Visioning 15 Recommendations Seniors 22 Youth 38 Open Space 46 Conclusion 62 Appendices A: Community Character i B: Community Visioning Data v C: Seniors xv D: Open Space xxi E: Contact Information xxv 5 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We would like to express our thanks to those who have helped us throughout the course of this project. This report would not have been possible without the assistance and support of the following groups and people: Assemblyman Daniel O’Donnell and Staff Peter Arndtsen of the Columbus/Amsterdam Business Improvement District The Municipal Art Society Community Board 7, Youth Education and Library Committee Our Hosts: Red Oak Apartments International Youth Hostel Park West Neighborhood History Group Church of the Ascension Our Sources: Kathleen Benjamin, Dottie Janotjka,
  • Samuel D. Gruber 123 Clarke Street Syracuse, New York 13210 Tel (+1 315) 762-2850 / Email: Samuelgruber@Gmail.Com

    Samuel D. Gruber 123 Clarke Street Syracuse, New York 13210 Tel (+1 315) 762-2850 / Email: [email protected]

    Samuel D. Gruber 123 Clarke Street Syracuse, New York 13210 Tel (+1 315) 762-2850 / email: [email protected] EDUCATION Ph.D. 1998 Columbia University, NY, NY, Dept. of Art History and Archeology M.Phil. 1993 Columbia University, NY, NY, Dept. of Art History and Archeology M.A. 1984 Columbia University, NY, NY, Dept. of Art History and Archeology 1981 Cornell University Summer Session, Rome, Italy Surveying and Measured Drawing Program B.A. 1977 Princeton University, Princeton, NJ (Honors in Medieval Studies, 1977) ACADEMIC APPOINTMENTS 2017 Visting Associate Professor, Jewish Studies, Cornell University 2001– present Part-time faculty in Jewish Studies/History of Art, Syracuse University 2014 Part-time faculty, Honors Program, Lemoyne College 2013 Part-time instructor, College of Visual and Performing Arts Syracuse University (summer session) 2013 Part-time instructor, Syracuse, University Honors Program, 2009 Lecturer in Art History, Cazenovia College 2003 Lecturer in Art and Art History, Colgate University 2002 Humanistic Studies Center, Syracuse University 2001 Humanistic Studies Center, Syracuse University 1996-1997 Rothman Visiting Lecturer in Judaic Studies, 1996 Adjunct Professor of Fine Arts, Syracuse University 1995 Adjunct Professor of Architecture, Cornell University 1994 Adjunct Professor in Fine Arts, Syracuse University 1994 Guest Lecturer, Jewish Studies Program, SUNY Binghamton 1987-1989 Preceptor, Art Humanities Course, Columbia University 1987 Lecturer, Gruppo Archeologico Romano, Rome 1984-1986 Part-time faculty,
  • On Current New York Architecture

    On Current New York Architecture

    OCULUS on current new york architecture Compensations and Awards The New York Chapter of the American Institute of Architects Volume 43, Number 9, June 1982 page2 Oculus OCULUS President's Report Compensation Survey Volume 43, Number 9, June 1982 by Joseph Wasserman Oculus A Change of Emphasis The NYC/AIA has completed a survey Editor: C. Ray Smith This issue of OCULUS is devoted to of Architects compensation. The last Managing Editor: Marian Page two subjects-looking at beautiful such survey was conducted ten years Art Director: Abigail Sturges buildings all designed by local boys, Typesetting: Susan Schechter ago. and architects' business - their fees, The New York Chapter of their <:ontracts, their compensation. I We are gratified with the the American Institute of Architects am sure we all prefer to focus on the participation: 109 out of 310 firms The Urban Center, 457 Madison A venue, awards. The business end of returned the questionnaire, a rather New York, New York 10022 architecture is not romantic, not the high percentage. In fact, the survey 212-838-9670 stuff to stir men's souls. One even accounts for nearly all the feels embarrassed having to concern architectural personnel covered by George S. Lewis, Executive Director oneself with these uncomfortable member firms' sustaining dues-2972 Executive Committee 1981-82: details of practice. After all, none of us owners and employees in all, of which Joseph Wasserman, President entered this profession with business 2495 are architecturally trained. Arthur I. Rosenblatt, First Vice President concerns uppermost in our minds. Tician Papachristou, Vice President The results are predictable.
  • District Lines Spring 2009

    District Lines Spring 2009

    news and viewsDISTRICT of the Historic Districts Council LINESSpring 2009 vol. xxiii no. 1 “ENDANG E R E D ” SOUTH STR ee T SE APORT MAK es SE V E N TO SAV E LI S T RECENTLY , THE SOUTH ST R EET SEAPO R T the 1939 New Market Building, which toric district in 1977 and its subsequent Historic District made the annual “Sev- lies just outside the locally designated expansion in 1989, alterations and con- en to Save” Endangered Properties List historic district, to make room for two struction in the neighborhood, under of the Preservation League of New York high-rise towers. The new development the watchful eye of the Landmarks Preservation Commission, have been appropriate for the most part, some even enhancing the character of the dis- trict. Over the last few years, though, a number of projects proposed by the city to create new amenities in the increas- ingly residential and affluent neighbor- hood have been less sympathetic. For example, a roller-coaster-look- ing playground with ramps almost six feet high and additional six-foot-tall fences was approved for Burling Slip. In Peck Slip, a park with trees and sculp- tural rib-like elements evoking a ship will fill the open space. Another park, with tidal-marsh plantings, arrangement of bluestone in a wave pattern, and a water feature, will surround the Ti- HDC tanic Memorial located at the main en- 159-171 John Street, South Street Seaport Historic District trance to the district on Fulton Street. State, the statewide historic-preserva- would wall off the Seaport from the wa- Most recently, a proposal to reconstruct tion advocacy organization.