DOCSLIB.ORG

Federal Register/Vol. 77, No. 222/Friday, November 16, 2012

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Federal Register/Vol. 77, No. 222/Friday, November 16, 2012 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2012 / Notices 68819 Department of Energy Oak Ridge Office contact Katatra Vasquez, U.S. ADDRESSES: Judith L. Henry, Forest professional staff in consultation with Department of Energy Oak Ridge Office, Supervisor, USDA Forest Service, representatives of the Cherokee Nation; P.O. Box 2001, SE–32, Oak Ridge, TN Ozark-St. Francis National Forests, Chickasaw Nation; Choctaw Nation of 37831, telephone (865) 576–0835 before Russellville, AR 72801, telephone (479) Oklahoma; Eastern Band of Cherokee; December 17, 2012. Repatriation of the 964–7202. Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma; human remains and associated funerary SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is Poarch Band of Creeks (previously listed object to the Eastern Band of Cherokee here given in accordance with the as the Poarch Band of Creek Indians of Indians may proceed after that date if no Native American Graves Protection and Alabama); Quapaw Tribe of Indians; additional claimants come forward. Repatriation Act (NAGPRA), 25 U.S.C. The Muscogee (Creek) Nation; The The U.S. Department of Energy Oak 3003, of the completion of an inventory Seminole Nation of Oklahoma; and the Ridge Office is responsible for notifying of human remains and associated United Keetoowah Band of Cherokee the Cherokee Nation; Chickasaw Nation; funerary objects in the possession of the Indians in Oklahoma. Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma; Eastern Ozark-St. Francis National Forests. The Band of Cherokee; Eastern Shawnee human remains and associated funerary History and Description of the Remains Tribe of Oklahoma; Poarch Band of objects were removed from private land In July 1981, human remains Creeks (previously listed as the Poarch and donated to the Ozark-St. Francis representing, at minimum, one Band of Creek Indians of Alabama); National Forests by private collectors. individual were removed from site Quapaw Tribe of Indians; The Muscogee This notice is published as part of the 40RE86 in Roane County, TN, as a result (Creek) Nation; The Seminole Nation of National Park Service’s administrative of an archeological investigation. The Oklahoma; and the United Keetoowah responsibilities under NAGPRA, 25 site dates to the Mississippian period Band of Cherokee Indians in Oklahoma, U.S.C. 3003(d)(3). The determinations in (specifically, the eastern Tennessee that this notice has been published. this notice are the sole responsibility of Dallas Phase, A.D. 1300 to 1600). Based Dated: October 25, 2012. the museum, institution, or Federal on the associated pottery found at the David Tarler, agency that has control of the Native site, the human remains date to about Acting Manager, National NAGPRA Program. American human remains and A.D. 1400. No known individuals were associated funerary objects. The [FR Doc. 2012–27953 Filed 11–15–12; 8:45 am] identified. The one associated funerary National Park Service is not responsible object is a small shell tempered vessel. BILLING CODE 4312–50–P for the determinations in this notice. The Dallas Phase people of the Upper Consultation Tennessee Valley are not clearly DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR identifiable as being culturally affiliated A detailed assessment of the human with a modern-day tribe. However, National Park Service remains was made by the Ozark-St. based on consultation and the totality of Francis National Forests professional circumstances surrounding acquisition [NPS–WASO–NAGPRA–11493; 2200–1100– staff in consultation with 665] of the human remains and associated representatives of the Absentee- funerary object, the U.S. Department of Notice of Inventory Completion: U.S. Shawnee Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma; Energy Oak Ridge Office has determined Department of Agriculture, Forest Alabama-Quassarte Tribal Town; Caddo by a reasonable belief that the human Service, Ozark-St. Francis National Nation of Oklahoma; Cherokee Nation; remains and associated funerary object Forests, Russellville, AR Chickasaw Nation; Choctaw Nation of are culturally affiliated with the Eastern Oklahoma; Delaware Nation, Oklahoma; Band of Cherokee Indians. AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior. Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma; ACTION: Notice. Jena Band of Choctaw Indians; Kialegee Determinations Made by the U.S. Tribal Town; Miami Tribe of Oklahoma; Department of Energy Oak Ridge Office SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians; Officials of the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), Forest Service, Peoria Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma; Energy Oak Ridge Office have Ozark-St. Francis National Forests has Quapaw Tribe of Indians; Shawnee determined that: completed an inventory of human Tribe; The Muscogee (Creek) Nation; • Pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001(9), the remains and associated funerary objects, The Osage Nation (previously listed as human remains described in this notice in consultation with the appropriate the Osage Tribe); The Seminole Nation represent the physical remains of one Indian tribes, and has determined that of Oklahoma; Thlopthlocco Tribal individual of Native American ancestry. there is a cultural affiliation between the Town; Tunica-Biloxi Indian Tribe; • Pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001(3)(A), human remains and associated funerary United Keetoowah Band of Cherokee the one object described above is objects and present-day Indian tribes. Indians in Oklahoma; and the Wichita reasonably believed to have been placed Representatives of any Indian tribe that and Affiliated Tribes (Wichita, Keechi, with or near individual human remains believes itself to be culturally affiliated Waco & Tawakonie), Oklahoma. with the human remains and associated at the time of death or later as part of History and Description of the Remains the death rite or ceremony. funerary objects may contact the Ozark- • Pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001(2), there St. Francis National Forests. In 1970 and 1971, human remains is a relationship of shared group Repatriation of the human remains and representing, at minimum, 16 identity that can be reasonably traced associated funerary objects to the Indian individuals were removed from site between the Native American human tribes stated below may occur if no 3NW101, on private property, in remains and the Eastern Band of additional claimants come forward. Newton County, AR, by Thelma and Cherokee Indians. DATES: Representatives of any Indian Louis Gregoire of the AAS. In 1988, they tribe that believes it has a cultural donated their collection to the USDA- Additional Requestors and Disposition affiliation with the human remains and Forest Service. No known individuals Representatives of any Indian tribe associated funerary objects should were identified. The 74 associated that believes itself to be culturally contact the Ozark-St. Francis National funerary objects from identified burials affiliated with the human remains and Forests at the address below by include 25 ceramic vessels, 15 dart associated funerary object should December 17, 2012. points, 19 knives, 2 blanks, 6 scrapers, VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:43 Nov 15, 2012 Jkt 229001 PO 00000 Frm 00089 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\16NON1.SGM 16NON1 mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES 68820 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2012 / Notices 1 perforator, 1 chisel, 1 gorget, 1 Town; Tunica-Biloxi Indian Tribe; U.S. C. 1701 et seq.), the National charcoal sample, 1 flake, 1 axe, and 1 United Keetoowah Band of Cherokee Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1601 et deer mandible. Two funerary objects Indians in Oklahoma; and the Wichita seq.), the Iran Sanctions Act of 1996 were reported by the Gregoires but were and Affiliated Tribes (Wichita, Keechi, (Pub. L. 104–172) (50 U.S.C. 1701 note), missing when the collection was Waco & Tawakonie), Oklahoma, that as amended, the Comprehensive Iran donated; they are 1 elbow pipe and 1 this notice has been published. Sanctions, Accountability, and mano. The site dates from A.D. 653 to Dated: October 12, 2012. Divestment Act of 2010 (Pub. L. 111– 881. It is affiliated to the Caddo Nation Sherry Hutt, 195) (22 U.S.C. 8501 et seq.), as of Oklahoma through the Fourche Manager, National NAGPRA Program. amended, the Iran Threat Reduction and Maline-related archeological complexes Syria Human Rights Act of 2012 (Pub. [FR Doc. 2012–27952 Filed 11–15–12; 8:45 am] (e.g. Mulberry River Culture and L. 112–158), Section 212(f) of the BILLING CODE 4312–50–P Limestone Complex). Immigration and Nationality Act of Determinations Made by the USDA 1952, as amended (8 U.S.C. 1182(f)), and Forest Service, Ozark-St. Francis DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY Section 301 of title 3, United States National Forests Code. Officials of the USDA Forest Service, Office of Foreign Assets Control Section 3 of the Order blocks, with Ozark-St. Francis National Forests have certain exceptions, all property and Designation of Four (4) Individuals and interests in property that are in the determined that: Five (5) Entities Pursuant to Executive • Pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001(9), the United States, that come within the Order 13628 of October 9, 2012 human remains described in this notice United States, or that are or come within represent the physical remains of 16 AGENCY: Office of Foreign Assets the possession or control of any United individuals of Native American Control, Treasury. States person, of persons determined by ancestry. ACTION: Notice. the Secretary of the Treasury, in • Pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001(3)(A), consultation with, or at the the 74 objects described above are SUMMARY: The Treasury Department’s recommendation of, the Secretary of reasonably believed to have been placed Office of Foreign Assets Control State, to satisfy certain criteria set forth with or near individual human remains (‘‘OFAC’’) is publishing the name of in the Order. at the time of death or later as part of four (4) individuals and five (5) entities designated on November 8, 2012, as On November 8, 2012, the Director of the death rite or ceremony.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Allotment and Fractionation Within the Citizen Potawatomi Nation
    CP 87 and CP100: Allotment and Fractionation Within the Citizen Potawatomi Nation Mark Welliver1 INTRODUCTION The letter came to my father’s house sometime in the early 1990s. His cousin wrote seeking to obtain his consent to sell CP 87 and 100, the Citizen Potawatomi tracts originally allotted to their grandparents, Ellen Yott and Joseph Haas, following the Dawes Act of 1887. By now, ownership of tracts 87 and 100 had become fractionated into eighteen undivided interests through multiple successive heirship divisions. The only way his cousin could alienate his interest was to convince all the heirs to relinquish, by unanimous consent, the trust status of the land. My father discarded the letter, only to pull it out of the wastebasket later and file it away. Yet, the letter had awakened repressed memories and bitter emotions of growing up as an orphan in the Concho and Chilocco BIA schools in Oklahoma, of the death of his parents, of the severe conditions of the BIA boarding schools, and of the abandonment at age nine by his uncle, his legal guardian. CP tracts 87 and 100, he decided, would remain in trust. Besides, he still had not given up the idea of growing pecans on his family’s land. The legacy of CP 87 and 100 dates back, through written narratives, to well over 100 years prior to the General Allotment Act of 1887.2 In the mid-1700s Mahteenose, the daughter of Menominee chief Ahkenepoweh, married a French and Indian fur trader named Joseph LeRoy at what is now Green Bay, Wisconsin.
    [Show full text]
  • Tribal and House District Boundaries
    ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Tribal Boundaries and Oklahoma House Boundaries ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 22 ! 18 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 13 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 20 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 7 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Cimarron ! ! ! ! 14 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 11 ! ! Texas ! ! Harper ! ! 4 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! n ! ! Beaver ! ! ! ! Ottawa ! ! ! ! Kay 9 o ! Woods ! ! ! ! Grant t ! 61 ! ! ! ! ! Nowata ! ! ! ! ! 37 ! ! ! g ! ! ! ! 7 ! 2 ! ! ! ! Alfalfa ! n ! ! ! ! ! 10 ! ! 27 i ! ! ! ! ! Craig ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! h ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 26 s ! ! Osage 25 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! a ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 6 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Tribes ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 16 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! W ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 21 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 58 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 38 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Tribes by House District ! 11 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 1 Absentee Shawnee* ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Woodward ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 2 ! 36 ! Apache* ! ! ! 40 ! 17 ! ! ! 5 8 ! ! ! Rogers ! ! ! ! ! Garfield ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 1 40 ! ! ! ! ! 3 Noble ! ! ! Caddo* ! ! Major ! ! Delaware ! ! ! ! ! 4 ! ! ! ! ! Mayes ! ! Pawnee ! ! ! 19 ! ! 2 41 ! ! ! ! ! 9 ! 4 ! 74 ! ! ! Cherokee ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Ellis ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 41 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 72 ! ! ! ! ! 35 4 8 6 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 5 3 42 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 77
    [Show full text]
  • Quapaw Tribe for the Period 1871 to 1946
    • ," • REPORT OF MEETING OF QUAPAW dENERAL COUNCIL HELD AT NORTF!­ EI\5TERN OKLAHOMA Aid,! COLLEGE, MIAMI, ~KLAHOMA, JULY 21, 1962. The meeting was called to Orrh'.T by Chairman .Robert Whitebird at Z: 15 p. ill • • Approxirnately 150 pC!"tJon,·? were in attendance. Minutes of this meeting will be sent to all thoce whC';Je nalnes and addresses appear on the attendance roster. Not aU in attendance ;:;ignc-o this roster. Mrs. Horner Gillnore l(~d the Invocation, which was the Lords Prayer in unlson. Chairman WhitehirrJ read the following agenda: Claim No. l, Dock,,! 14, which was lost. Election of Business Committee members Funds of Q:lapa\V l'ninors 1\1enlbcr.3hip or6ina.nc~ Chairman Whltebird explained that in addition to the agenda, other business hrought before the Coun.cil "\viLl also illclude a report on the possibility of reopening the Claim No. I, under Docket 14, Chairman Whitebird stated tha t Louis Ballard had mailed out 2-pproximately SOD letters to Quapav...'.s concerning this Ina-tter and that 1\1r. Ballard will give a report later on in the nlccting about this nl<ltter. Chairman Whitebird introduced Mr. Graham Holmes, Area Director of the Muskogee Area Office 1 and 1\11". Loyd Roberts, Quapa"\v Clainls Attorney, of • Joplin, lv1i33011ri. Alfred Sky" spoke: "Good af~crnoon. It is nice to be here this afternoon even though we did pave to tarn off th(~ air conditioners. Last year I gave you a financi.J.l report as of JU:le 30, 1961. I will now give you the annnal financial report for UF:: pa.st yC-.Ctr cndlIlg June 3D, 1962.
    [Show full text]
  • HUNGRY GHOSTS: PONCA GIRLS in TWO WORLDS by ANN
    HUNGRY GHOSTS: PONCA GIRLS IN TWO WORLDS By ANN MARIE WASILEWSKI Bachelor of Arts Augusta College Augusta, Georgia 1969 Master of Education University of Georgia Athens, Georgia 1976 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF EDUCATION July, 2004 COPYRIGHT By Ann Marie Wasilewski July, 2004 ii HUNGRY GHOSTS: PONCA GIRLS IN TWO WORLDS Thesis Approved: Pamela U. Brown Thesis Advisor Pamela Fry Gary J. Conti Katye M. Perry Dr. Al Carlozzi Dean of the Graduate College ii Dedicated to my mother and father. Catherine Howard Wasilewski Walter John Wasilewski iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First, I want to express my deep gratitude to my dissertation advisor, Dr. Pam Brown, for her extreme patience, constructive guidance, and gentle encouragement. Your kind words were a balm to my soul as I struggled through this process. Second, I want to thank my committee members, Dr. Gary Conti, Dr. Pamela Fry, and Dr. Katye Perry. I am so appreciative of the time you spent reading my dissertation and for the suggestions you made to improve it. Third, I want to acknowledge two former members of my committee, Dr. Natalie Adams and Dr. Pamela Bettis, who moved on to different universities. Without your interest, guidance, and assistance I would not have made it this far. Fourth, I thank the Ponca girls and the members of the Ponca community who shared their thoughts and culture with me. It was a tremendous education. I also want to thank my Bahá’i friends, Nancy and Jim Schear, for their encouragement and the hours they spent with me at their dining room table going over my drafts.
    [Show full text]
  • Muscogee (Creek) Nation in Support of Petitioner ______
    No. 18-9526 IN THE JIMCY MCGIRT, Petitioner, v. OKLAHOMA, Respondent. _____________ On Writ of Certiorari to the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals _____________ BRIEF FOR AMICUS CURIAE MUSCOGEE (CREEK) NATION IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONER _____________ ROGER WILEY RIYAZ A. KANJI ATTORNEY GENERAL Counsel of Record KYLE HASKINS DAVID A. GIAMPETRONI FIRST ASSISTANT KANJI & KATZEN, PLLC ATTORNEY GENERAL 303 Detroit St., Ste 400 MUSCOGEE (CREEK) Ann Arbor, MI 48104 NATION (734) 769-5400 Post Office Box 580 [email protected] Okmulgee, OK 74447 (918) 295-9720 CORY J. ALBRIGHT PHILIP H. TINKER LYNSEY R. GAUDIOSO KANJI & KATZEN, PLLC 401 Second Ave. S., Ste 700 Seattle, WA 98104 (206) 344-8100 Counsel for Amicus Curiae Muscogee (Creek) Nation i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ..................................... iii INTEREST OF AMICUS CURIAE ............................1 INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT ...............................................................1 ARGUMENT ...............................................................5 I. The United States and the Creek Nation Established a Reservation by Treaty. .............5 A. Text ........................................................5 B. Surrounding History .............................8 II. The Creek Allotment Act Preserved the Nation’s Reservation. ..................................... 11 A. Text ......................................................12 B. Surrounding History ........................... 16 C. Hitchcock and Buster ........................... 17 III.
    [Show full text]
  • Quapaw Tribe of Oklahoma
    QUAPAW TRIBE OF OKLAHOMA Ao. 80x 765 (918) 542-1853 "'lIrIOPOW. Oklahoma 74363 Quapaw Tribal Business Committee FAX (918) 542-4694 Regular Meeting, 9:30 a.m. January 9, 1993 ATTENDING: Lloyd Buffalo, Chairman Leonard Smith, Vice Chairman Jeralyn Brittle, Sec./Treas. Mike McKibben, Member Frances Hawk, Member (arrived at 10:10) ABSENT: George Romick, Member (excused) Linda Morgan, Member (excused) OTHERS ATTENDING: Nettie Detherage, Cindy Weiss, John Todd Wes Valliere, Raymond Griffin Chairman Buffalo called the meeting to order at 9:30 a.m. Lenoard smith gave the invocation. Secretary carried out the roll call and announced a quorum to do business, Chairman Buffalo declared a quorum to do business. Nettie advised the Business Committee that Barbara Kyser, Tribal Administrator was ill and would not be at the meeting . Minutes of 12/12/92, 12/17/92, 12/18/92, 12/29/92 were • presented for corrections and approval. Mike stated that his name was left off of the 12/17/92 minutes, Secretary so noted and corrected. Leonard moved to accept the minutes of 12/12/92, 12/17/92 with correction, 12/18/92 and 12/29/92. Mike second. Call for the question. Vote: 4 yes, 0 no, 0 abstain, 3 absent. Treasurer report was given. Discussion was held on the CD at Cimmarron Federal. Secretary suggested that the $2000 that was to be given to the Convenience Store be taken out of the Concession Account and when the CD matures on Febuary 22, 1993, reimburse the Concession Account so as not to have a penalty.
    [Show full text]
  • Tribal-Led Cleanup Activities at the Tar Creek Superfund Site
    A SUITE OF OPTIONS AT TAR CREEK Craig Kreman and Summer King Quapaw Tribe of Oklahoma American Society of Mining and Reclamation June 6, 2018 2 PRESENTATION OVERVIEW • History • Tar Creek Superfund Site • Past, Present And Future Remedial Projects • “We need more options!” ▫ Soil Amendments ▫ GIS Kriging ▫ Ecological Risk values • Questions/Answers 3 QUAPAW TRIBE HISTORY • Several hundred years ago, the Quapaw were a division of a larger group known as the Dhegiha Sioux. They split into the tribes known today as the Quapaw, Osage, Ponca, Kansa, and Omaha. • The Quapaw moved down the Mississippi River into Arkansas. This is how the Tribe became known by other Tribes as “Ugaxpa” (“Ugakhpa”), which means (roughly) “the downstream people.” • The Quapaws settled in the area where the Arkansas River met the Mississippi River. • This is where the Quapaw stayed until they were pushed out by the Arkansas Territorial, and US Governments in the 1820s. • After being removed from Arkansas, the Quapaws suffered greatly from disease and starvation until the US Government was finally convinced in 1833 to establish a reservation for them in Oklahoma. 4 QUAPAW TRIBE HISTORY 5 TAR CREEK SUPERFUND SITE • Tri-State Mining District • Mining began in the area during the late 1800’s and lasted until approximately 1970 • Mining and milling of ore (primarily lead and zinc) produced more than 500 million tons of waste in area • Two primary types of wastes from mining processes: chat and fine tailings TAR CREEK SUPERFUND SITE 7 TAR CREEK SUPERFUND SITE 8 TAR CREEK SUPERFUND SITE 9 TAR CREEK SUPERFUND SITE 10 TAR CREEK SUPERFUND SITE 11 TAR CREEK SUPERFUND SITE 12 TAR CREEK SUPERFUND SITE 13 TAR CREEK SUPERFUND SITE 14 TAR CREEK SUPERFUND SITE FOR EVERY 1 TON OF ORE EXTRACTED, APPROXIMATELY 16 TONS OF CHAT AND TAILINGS WAS LEFT BEHIND 15 TAR CREEK SUPERFUND SITE 16 REMEDIAL ACTION ACTIVITIES CATHOLIC 40 • “Catholic 40” • Tribal Trust Land • 40-acre parcel owned by the Quapaw Tribe of Oklahoma and was set aside in 1892 to the Catholic Church for religious and education purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • Winter 2020|Ogahpah Ikazozo
    Winter, 2020 Volume II, No. 1 e o cial quarterly publication of the Quapaw Nation 18-Year Goodeagle Suit Finally Sett led, Sett lement Checks Coming in February to Landowners On January 29, Chairman John Berrey, pictured above , att ended Presi- dent Trump's signing of the historic U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement on the White House lawn. Chairman Invited to White House WASHINGTON, D.C.—Quapaw Nati on Chairman John L. Berrey att ended President Trump’s signing of the historic U.S.-Mexico- Canada Agreement on the White House lawn today. “On behalf of the Quapaw Nati on and my people, I was hon- ored to be there when President Trump signed the USMCA, an accomplishment that few people thought was possible,” Chair- man Berrey said. Chairman Berrey joined American workers and farmers, union members, U.S. Senators and members of the House of Rep- See White House, page 2 Saracen Casino Resort Could Open in May Pine Bluff , AR—Less than 160 days are left unti l the Saracen Casino Resort could open its doors for business. Constructi on workers are doing their best to race the clock on their work schedule to fi nalize the fi rst phase of the development and see the project open as soon as possible. Under the contract, June 26th has been set as the proposed opening date for casino operati ons to begin at Saracen Ca- sino. According to Chairman John Berrey, the casino should be ready to welcome customers even sooner than initi ally planned. Chairman Berrey is aiming for a soft opening in May 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Honoring Nations Directory of Honored Programs 1998-2018
    HONORING NATIONS DIRECTORY OF HONORED PROGRAMS 1998-2018 HONORING CONTRIBUTIONS IN THE GOVERNANCE OF AMERICAN INDIAN NATIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS About Honoring Nations 1 Honoring Nations Board of Governors 2 Administration 3 Sponsoring Organizations 4 Honored Programs 5 Program Descriptions 8 Index 59 Programs by Year 50 Programs by Topic Area 72 Programs by Tribe 77 About Honoring Nations Established in 1998, Honoring Contributions in the Governance of American Indian Nations (Honoring Nations) identifies, celebrates, and shares outstanding tribal government programs and practices in Native nation building. The program is administered by the Harvard Project on American Indian Economic Development (Harvard Project) at Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government. By shining a bright light on successes in tribal governance, Honoring Nations is contributing to the expanding professionalism of Native nation builders, allowing Native leaders and decision makers to learn from their peers. High public visibility and news coverage of Honoring Nations also permit non- Native policymakers, the media, and the general public to see what Native nations are actually doing in the drive for self-determination. Honorees demonstrate a commitment to fortifying sovereignty, cultural identity, and good governance. They also serve as models of inspiration, innovation, and practicality, eliminating the need to “re-invent the wheel” for many other growing communities. The best practices and innovations of honorees form the raw material from which the Harvard Project fashions usable tools for nation building. Honoring Nations provides a critical value to today’s Native nations. Decades of federal policies— including overt attempts at assimilation and termination—left American Indian communities the poorest in the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Tribal-Led Cleanup Activities at The
    QUAPAW TRIBE REMEDIAL EFFORTS AT THE TAR CREEK SUPERFUND SITE Tim Kent Quapaw Tribe of Oklahoma Environmental Justice Forum Dallas, TX June 12-13, 2018 2 OVERVIEW •History •Tar Creek Superfund Site •Quapaw Environmental Office •Building Capacity •OU4 Remedial Action •Environmental Justice •Questions/Answers 3 QUAPAW TRIBE HISTORY • Several hundred years ago, the Quapaw were a division of a larger group known as the Dhegiha Sioux. They split into the tribes known today as the Quapaw, Osage, Ponca, Kansa, and Omaha when they left the Ohio Valley. • The Quapaw moved down the Mississippi River into Arkansas. This is how the Tribe became known by other Tribes as “Ugaxpa” (“Ugakhpa”), which means (roughly) “the downstream people.” The Tribe’s name eventually became “Quapaw” which was easier to pronounce for Euro-American explorers and settlers. • Another tribe (the Illinois Tribe) referred to the Quapaws as “Arkansa”; thus the name of the Arkansas River and the State of Arkansas. • French explorers also applied the name of the river to the Quapaw people-Riviere des Arks or d’Asark from which Ozark (as in “Ozark Mountains”) was derived. 4 QUAPAW TRIBE HISTORY • The Quapaws settled in the area where the Arkansas River met the Mississippi, where the meandering of the two massive rivers had deposited nutrient-rich soil conducive to farming. • This is where the Quapaw stayed until they were pushed out by the Arkansas Territorial, and US Governments in the 1820s. • After being removed from Arkansas, the Quapaws suffered greatly from disease and starvation until the US Government was finally convinced, in 1833, to establish a reservation for them in Oklahoma (then known as “Indian Territory”) .
    [Show full text]
  • Sustaining O-Gah-Pah: an Analysis of Quapaw Language Loss and Preservation
    Ouachita Baptist University Scholarly Commons @ Ouachita Honors Theses Carl Goodson Honors Program 2017 Sustaining O-gah-pah: An Analysis of Quapaw Language Loss and Preservation Robert DeSoto Ouachita Baptist University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.obu.edu/honors_theses Part of the Indigenous Education Commons, Indigenous Studies Commons, Language and Literacy Education Commons, and the Linguistic Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation DeSoto, Robert, "Sustaining O-gah-pah: An Analysis of Quapaw Language Loss and Preservation" (2017). Honors Theses. 255. https://scholarlycommons.obu.edu/honors_theses/255 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Carl Goodson Honors Program at Scholarly Commons @ Ouachita. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons @ Ouachita. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Ouachita Baptist University Sustaining O-gah-pah An Analysis of Quapaw Language Loss and Preservation Robert DeSoto Carl Goodson Honors Program Project Director/First Reader: Dr. Margarita Pintado Second Reader: Dr. Kevin Motl Third Reader: Dr. Barbara Pemberton April 26, 2017 1 Contents Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................2 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................3 Ardina ................................................................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • TRIBE OR TRIBAL ORGANIZATION INITIAL CR RELEASE Alabama Ma-Chis Lower Creek Indian Tribe $7,037 Mowa Band of Choctaw Indians
    2018 Initial CR Release of LIHEAP Block Grant Funds to Indian Tribes and Tribal Organizations under P.L. 115-56 INITIAL CR TRIBE OR TRIBAL ORGANIZATION RELEASE Alabama Ma-Chis Lower Creek Indian Tribe $7,037 Mowa Band of Choctaw Indians $128,077 Poarch Band of Creek Indians (also in Florida) $82,073 United Cherokee Ani-Yun Wiya Nation $33,442 Alaska Aleutian/Pribilof Islands Association $165,633 Aniak Traditional Council $149,594 Assn. of Village Council Presidents $2,392,465 Bristol Bay Native Association $900,047 Chuathbaluk Traditional Council $18,751 Cook Inlet $259,388 Kenaitze Indian Tribe $117,991 Orutsararmuit Native Council $218,761 Seldovia Village $10,938 Sitka Tribe of Alaska $65,595 Tanana Chiefs Conference $1,493,031 Tlingit & Haida Central Council $700,036 Yakutat Tlingit Tribe $31,252 Arizona Cocopah Tribe $7,223 Colorado River Indian Tribes (also in California) $23,645 Gila River Pima-Maricopa Community $72,889 Navajo Nation (also in New Mexico and Utah) $1,391,576 Pascua Yaqui Tribe $27,844 Quechan Tribe (also in California) $17,796 Salt River Pima Maricopa Ind. Cmty. $26,894 San Carlos Apache Tribe $44,348 White Mountain Apache Tribe $63,355 California Berry Creek Rancheria $5,620 Big Valley Band of Pomo Indians $1,513 Bishop Paiute $21,182 Coyote Valley Pomo Band $4,669 Enterprise Rancheria $2,162 Hoopa Valley Tribe $38,734 Hopland Band $5,880 Karuk Tribe $28,100 2018 Initial CR Release of LIHEAP Block Grant Funds to Indian Tribes and Tribal Organizations under P.L. 115-56 INITIAL CR TRIBE OR TRIBAL ORGANIZATION RELEASE Mooretown Rancheria $16,038 N.
    [Show full text]