Map of Indian Lands in the United States

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Map of Indian Lands in the United States 132°W 131°W 130°W 129°W 128°W 127°W 126°W 125°W 124°W 123°W 122°W 121°W 120°W 119°W 118°W 117°W 116°W 115°W 114°W 113°W 112°W 111°W 110°W 109°W 108°W 107°W 106°W 105°W 104°W 103°W 102°W 101°W 100°W 99°W 98°W 97°W 96°W 95°W 94°W 93°W 92°W 91°W 90°W 89°W 88°W 87°W 86°W 85°W 84°W 83°W 82°W 81°W 80°W 79°W 78°W 77°W 76°W 75°W 74°W 73°W 72°W 71°W 70°W 69°W 68°W 67°W 66°W 65°W 64°W 63°W 48°N 46°N 47°N Neah Bay 4 35 14 45°N Everett 46°N Taholah CANADA Seattle Nespelem 40 Aberdeen 44°N Wellpinit Browning Spokane 45°N Harlem Belcourt WAS HIN Box Wagner E GTO Plummer Elder IN N MA 10 Pablo E SUPER Wapato IO Poplar K R Toppenish A 43°N New L Town Fort Totten Red Lake NT 44°N O Lapwai RM Portland VE Sault MO Sainte Marie NTANA Cass Lake Siletz Pendleton 42°N K NH NORTH DAKOTA Ashland YOR EW 43°N W N arm Sp L ring A s KE No H r Fort U th Yates Boston w Billings R TTS e Crow E 41°N s Age O S t ncy HU Worcester O R N AC RE eg Lame Deer OTA NTARIO SS GON io MINNES E O MA 42°N n Sisseton K A Providence 23 Aberdeen L N I 39 Rochester R A Springfield Minneapolis 51 G Saint Paul T SIN I C WISCON Eagl e H 40°N IDA Butte Buffalo Boise HO C I 6 41°N R M o E cky M SOUTH DAKOTA ou K AN ntai ICHIG n R A M egion Lower Brule Fort Thompson L E n Grand Rapids I io New York g 39°N e Milwaukee R Fort Hall R west 24 E d Detroit Mi E 40°N Fort Washakie K WYOMING LA Rosebud Pine Ridge Cleveland IA Redding Wagner AN Toledo LV 32 NSY PEN Philadelphia 38°N Chicago NJ A 39°N IOW Winnebago Pittsburgh Fort Wayne Elko 25 Great Plains Region Baltimore Des Moines MD E NEBRASKA OHIO D 37°N Sa Reno lt Lake Washington, DC 38°N City Omaha Columbus C arson C NA ity NDIA 22 I NE VA Fort Dayton DA Duchesne Sacramento Indianapolis 36°N 15 IA San Francisco Cincinnati GIN ATLANTIC OCEAN 37°N VIR PACIFIC OCEAN OIS EST A Oakland ILLIN W NI 29 VIRGI UTAH Denver Richmond Virginia Horton Beach San Jose Kansas 35°N City W Poplar Saint lls 36°N e Hi t s Louis Lexing on- t tte e Faye rn R COLOR Colorado egion ADO Springs Fresno CKY KENTU So SOURI 34°N uthwest Re MIS 35°N gion Greensboro Raleigh Saint George gion KANSAS Wichita e R INA CA Towaoc ern ROL LIFO ast CA RN 26 ,28 , 31 E TH IA Ignacio OR 37, 38 , 44 N Las Vegas 33°N Shiprock Quapaw Knoxville Navajo Region Farmington Dulce Miami 46 Peoria 34°N Charlotte Pa Miami/Peoria Modoc Nashville Kaw Miami c 12 Federally Recognized Tribal Entity * ID i Kaw/Ponca Ottawa 53 fi Tu 18 Eastern Shawnee ba c Cherokee Absentee-Shawnee Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma 1 Tonkawa R City 49 33 Pawhuska Wyandotte e Chinle Alabama-Quassarte Tribal Town 2 41 g Seneca-Cayuga io 36 Ponca Cherokee n Keams 27 Apache Tribe of Oklahoma 3 Canyon OKLAHOMA 30 Otoe- Pawnee Valentine Ohkay Owingeh Missouria Pawnee Tulsa Aroostook Band of Micmacs 4 EE Caddo Nation of Oklahoma 5 32°N Fort NESS Chattanooga Defiance 16 TEN 33°N 7 50 Cayuga Nation 6 Crownpoint Sac Gallup Iowa Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma 7 Los and 34 Creek Muskogee An A geles Fox IN Cheyenne and Arapahoe Tribes, Oklahoma 8 AR Cheyenne-Arapaho 8 45 Memphis ROL IZ Okmulgee A ONA Concho Kickapoo H C Comanche Nation, Oklahoma 9 Long Beach Riverside Oklahoma 2 S OUT Sa City 48 ANSA S nta Zuni Ramah Caddo-Wichita-Delaware 20 1 Creek/Seminole ARK Cowlitz Indian Tribe 10 Ana Albuquerque 5 Shawnee Laguna 19 Delaware Nation, Oklahoma 11 Citizen Seminole Palm Amarillo Sp 21 52 Potaw atomi 47 Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma 12 31°N rings Parker Kiowa-Comanche Anadarko Nation- ntee Little Rock Atlanta Fort Sill Apache Tribe of Oklahoma 13 32°N -Apache-Ft Sill Apache/ 11 Abse Seminole Caddo-Wichita-Delaware Shawnee 13 42 Houlton Band of Maliseet Indians 14 3 Ada Choctaw Talihina Ione Band of Miwok Indians of California 15 Kiowa-Comanche- 9 Iowa Tribe of Oklahoma 16 Apache-Fort Sill Apache I Eastern Oklahoma SISSIPP Jena Band of Choctaw Indians 17 Whiteriver Chickasaw MIS Birmingham Scottsdale Kaw Nation, Oklahoma 18 Phoenix Region A San BAM Kialegee Tribal Town 19 Di ALA ego Mesa NEW 30°N MEXICO 43 GIA Kickapoo Tribe of Oklahoma 20 31°N EOR San G Kiowa Indian Tribe of Oklahoma 21 Carlos Yuma Sacaton Koi Nation of Northern California 22 Coolidge Lubbock Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe 23 Match-E-Be-Nash-She-Wish Band of Pottawatomi Indians of Michigan 24 Mescalero Montgomery Mechoopda Indian Tribe of Chico Rancheria, California 25 Philadelphia Miami Tribe of Oklahoma 26 Otoe-Missouria Tribe of Indians, Oklahoma 27 29°N Tucson Dallas 30°N Arlington Ottawa Tribe of Oklahoma 28 Shreveport Jackson Fo rt Pamunkey Indian Tribe 29 Sells Worth Pawnee Nation of Oklahoma 30 Peoria Tribe Indians of Oklahoma 31 Pokagon Band of Potawatomi Indians, Michigan and Indiana 32 ion Ponca Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma 33 S Reg Jacksonville El Paso outhern Plains 17 Sac & Fox Nation, Oklahoma 34 28°N 29°N Samish Indian Nation 35 San Juan Southern Paiute Tribe of Arizona 36 Seneca-Cayuga Nation 37 Mobile Shawnee Tribe 38 Shinnecock Indian Nation 39 165°E 170°E 175°E 180° 175°W 170°W 165°W 160°W 155°W 150°W 145°W 140°W 135°W 130°W 125°W 120°W 115°W Snoqualmie Indian Tribe 40 A TEXAS LOUISIAN Tejon Indian Tribe 41 Barrow 27°N 28°N Baton Rouge The Chickasaw Nation 42 BEAUFORT SEA The Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma 43 Wainwright Inupiat Algaaciq Scale 1:2,850,000 Kaktovik 0 10 20 30 40 The Modoc Tribe of Oklahoma 44 (St. Mary's) Miles New Orleans Nuiqsut (Barter Island) The Muscogee (Creek) Nation 45 Pilot Sta tion Austin Orlando Atqasuk (Nooiksut) Holy Cross The Quapaw Tribe of Indians 46 Point Lay (Atkasook) Marshall (Fortuna Ledge) The Seminole Nation of Oklahoma 47 Pitka's Point 65°N Thlopthlocco Tribal Town 48 65°N RUSSIA Andreafski Iqurmuit Houston on R Tonkawa Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma 49 26°N 27°N Asa'carsarmiut Tribe Yuk Point Hope Kalskag DA United Keetoowah Band of Cherokee Indians in Oklahoma 50 Ohogamiut San Tampa ORI Antonio FL Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head (Aquinnah) 51 Kivalina A n Arctic Village Lower Ka lskag laska Regio Wichita and Affiliated Tribes (Wichita, Keechi, Waco & Tawakonie), Oklahoma 52 Noatak Anaktuvuk Pass Venetie Wyandotte Nation 53 Shishmaref Ambler R Kotzebue in Kiana Fort Yukon w Shungnak k M Allakaket o Brevig ary's Igloo k Nunapitchuk Akiachak s Mission Kobuk Chalkyitsik u Evansville K Tuluksak Noorvik Kasigluk Kwethluk 25°N 26°N Diomede (Inalik)Wales Alatna (Bettles Field) Selawik Atmautluak Deering Birch Creek Akiak Hughes Beaver Baird Oscarville Buckland Circle Inlet MEXICO C King Island Teller hin Council Rampart Napakiak Orutsararmiut (Bethel) ik E Huslia Stevens Village sk White Mountain Inset 1 Napaskiak imo Solomon Tanana Com Minto Fairbanks mun Nome Koyukuk Hollywood Gambell ity (G !( Agency Eagle olovi Koyuk Galena (Louden ) PROJECTION INFORMATION: Corpus Christi Bill Moore'sn) Slough Elim Nenana Savoonga Shakto Miami 25°N olik Nulato Ruby Healy Lake All data except the (Alaska Inset) are projected to: 24°N Chuloonawick Kaltag Manley Dot Lake Ko tlik Unalakleet SKA Lambert Azimuthal Equal Area Laredo ALA Hot Springs Tetlin 60°N o o 60°N Hamilton Saint Michael Emmonak Takotna Telida Cantwell Northway Longitude of projection center: 100 West (150 West) Stebbins Tanacross o Alakanuk McGrath Latitude of projection center: 45 North BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS Grayling Shageluk Mentasta Lake CANADA ScammonNunam Bay Iqua Nikolai False easting and northing: 0.0 Anvik Crooked Creek Gak ona GULF OF MEXICO DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Georgetown ALASKA Cheesh-Na Tribe DATA SOURCES: Hooper BayPaimiut REGIONAL Gulkana 24°N Red Devil Knik Kluti Kaah (Copper Center) 23°N Chevak OFFICE Tazlina New Stuyahok 1:10M Satellite-derived land cover data and shaded relief with OFFICE OF TRUST SERVICES Newtok Stony River Chitina Umkumiut Tununak Sleetmute Chickaloon ocean bottom data from NaturalEarthData.com 2015; JUNE 2016 !( Mekoryuk Lime V illage Eklutna Tatitlek American Indian Reservation data last updated in 2005 from Inset 1 Nap aimute Skagway Nunakauyarmiut Tyonek Eyak (Cordova) Chilkat Chuathbaluk Sala f matof US Census data and USGS 1:24,000 topographic maps; Legend Eek Aniak Nondalton West Central Agency (Klukwan) Ke nai zet "ESRI Data and Maps" 2008; BERING SEA Nightmute Koliganek Newhalen Iliamna Chilkoot Tlingit and Haida New Stuyahok Ninilchik Oklahoma Tribal Statistical Area: Census Bureau (TIGER) data, Federally Recognized Tribal Entity * Chefornak Pedro Bay Chenega Yakutat !( 23°N Pribilof Islands Ale t (Haines) Douglas Eastern Regional Office Natural Resources Departmen t.
Recommended publications
  • Tribal Relations and Consultation at Txdot
    Tribal Relations and Consultation at TxDOT Draft Strategic Plan 2016 Archeological Studies Branch, Cultural Resources Management (CRM) Section, Environmental Affairs Division (ENV) Vision for Tribal Relations and Consultation at TxDOT The Texas Department of Transportation is a best-in-class agency that goes above and beyond the spirit of consultation to work collaboratively with federally recognized Native American tribes toward mutually beneficial outcomes during all levels of the transportation process. Mission of the Tribal Relations and Consultation Program: Build relationships and purposefully collaborate with tribal nations in the planning and implementation of TxDOT projects and programs. In working with tribal nations, TxDOT: . Recognizes the inherent sovereign status and reserved rights of tribes; . Practices and promotes cultural sensitivity when working with tribes; . Honors the spirit of various federal requirements and orders to consult with tribes; . Aims to go above and beyond current practices to foster trust and productivity; . Commits to providing meaningful and substantive consultation with tribes on transportation projects; and . Promotes collaborative consultation opportunities during planning and review processes within TXDOT. 2 Draft Tribal Relations and Consultation Strategic Plan 2016 Foreword Texas’ long and rich cultural history is rooted in the indigenous people who once inhabited the land. Tribal nations continue to have an inherent interest in the state’s natural and cultural resources. Today, the federal government recognizes tribes’ inherent sovereign status, a unique relationship that is embodied in the U.S. Constitution, treaties, court decisions, federal statutes and executive orders. As TxDOT builds a safe and reliable transportation system, the agency (on behalf of the Federal Highway Administration) consults with tribes on statewide transportation plans and projects with federal funding.
    [Show full text]
  • Tonkawa Indians Before the Time of the Spanish Explorers, Native Americans Inhabited the Open Ranges and Woodlands of Texas
    Tonkawa Indians Before the time of the Spanish explorers, Native Americans inhabited the open ranges and woodlands of Texas. One group that made its mark in history is the Tonkawa Indians. These people were thought to have come to Texas as early as the seventeenth century. Tonkawa, a Waco Indian word, means, “they all stay together,” which eloquently describes this group of nomadic Indian tribes. There is scant archeological evidence of the Tonkawa people, and historians have several theories on the tribal structure and lifestyles of this group. Some believe the Tonkawa were actually a group of independent bands of Indians, which may have included the Sana, Toho, Tohaha, Cantona, and Cava Indians. In the early eighteenth century these bands of Indians were thought to have joined together to form Tonkawa Proper. There is some evidence that the Tonkawa actually came to Texas much earlier as one cohesive group of Tonkawa Indians that lived further north. These nomadic hunters lived in tepees made from buffalo hide, grass and other materials. Tepees allowed bands to easily pack their homes and move with the migrating herds of buffalo or to outrun their enemies. An elected tribal chief led each band of Tonkawa, and each band was composed of maternal clans. Unlike many societies that are patriarchal, the Tonkawa clan membership followed on the side of the mother. When a couple got married, the man would go live with his wife’s clan, and the children would become members of their mother’s clan as well. As a society that always stays together, the Tonkawa established a system that ensured all widows, widowers, and orphaned children were taken care of if their family members died.
    [Show full text]
  • Teacher’S Guide Teacher’S Guide Little Bighorn National Monument
    LITTLE BIGHORN NATIONAL MONUMENT TEACHER’S GUIDE TEACHER’S GUIDE LITTLE BIGHORN NATIONAL MONUMENT INTRODUCTION The purpose of this Teacher’s Guide is to provide teachers grades K-12 information and activities concerning Plains Indian Life-ways, the events surrounding the Battle of the Little Bighorn, the Personalities involved and the Impact of the Battle. The information provided can be modified to fit most ages. Unit One: PERSONALITIES Unit Two: PLAINS INDIAN LIFE-WAYS Unit Three: CLASH OF CULTURES Unit Four: THE CAMPAIGN OF 1876 Unit Five: BATTLE OF THE LITTLE BIGHORN Unit Six: IMPACT OF THE BATTLE In 1879 the land where The Battle of the Little Bighorn occurred was designated Custer Battlefield National Cemetery in order to protect the bodies of the men buried on the field of battle. With this designation, the land fell under the control of the United States War Department. It would remain under their control until 1940, when the land was turned over to the National Park Service. Custer Battlefield National Monument was established by Congress in 1946. The name was changed to Little Bighorn National Monument in 1991. This area was once the homeland of the Crow Indians who by the 1870s had been displaced by the Lakota and Cheyenne. The park consists of 765 acres on the east boundary of the Little Bighorn River: the larger north- ern section is known as Custer Battlefield, the smaller Reno-Benteen Battlefield is located on the bluffs over-looking the river five miles to the south. The park lies within the Crow Indian Reservation in southeastern Montana, one mile east of I-90.
    [Show full text]
  • Cherokee Nation and Chickasaw Nation Criminal Jurisdiction Compacting Act of 2021
    Cherokee Nation and Chickasaw Nation Criminal Jurisdiction Compacting Act of 2021 Language Explainer This fact sheet summarizes, section-by-section, proposed Federal legislation relating to the Cherokee and Chickasaw Nations. If enacted, this bill would strengthen Tribal self- determination and empower Tribal-State partnerships by authorizing those Nations to compact with Oklahoma respecting criminal jurisdiction. The bill is proposed after consultation with those Nations and upon their request. Further, Oklahoma government officials have previously called for or otherwise offered public support for the approach integrated to this bill. Section 1 (Title) – Consistent with the bill’s scope and purpose, it is titled “Cherokee Nation and Chickasaw Nation Criminal Jurisdiction Compacting Act of 2021.” Section 2 (Definitions) – This section offers operative definitions for key terms in the bill, two of which are particularly important to the scope of its central authorization to compact. “Indian country” is defined by reference to statute, but “Indian land” is defined to include only lands universally understood to be “Indian country” prior to the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in McGirt—lands such as Tribal trust land, restricted allotments, and so-called dependent Indian communities. As such, “Indian land” is a subset of “Indian country,” and as provided in later sections, no authority would be granted to affect by compact any jurisdiction on “Indian lands.” Section 3 (Findings) – The findings clarify the bill’s intent and purpose. Consistent with Federal law, they acknowledge each Nation’s reservation as “Indian country” for purposes of criminal jurisdiction. The findings note ongoing intergovernmental work to enhance Tribal-State coordination in reservation law enforcement and particularly commend the use of compacting for purposes of supporting Tribal self-determination and intergovernmental cooperation.
    [Show full text]
  • Tribal Advisory Committee Summer 2017 Agenda
    CDC/ATSDR Tribal Advisory Committee Meeting Artesian Hotel 1001 West 1st Street, Sulphur, OK Note: All times are in Central Daylight Time (CDT) Tuesday, August 8, 2017 Federal Moderator: CDC Deputy Director/OSTLTS Director Tribal Moderator: Tribal Advisory Committee Chair 8:00 am Tribal Caucus (Tribal Members Only) This session is open only to currently enrolled members of federally recognized tribes. This session is closed to all federal employees, regardless of Tribal affiliation. 9:00 am Opening Blessing Jefferson Keel, MS (Chickasaw Nation), Lieutenant Governor, Chickasaw Nation Presentation of Colors—Chickasaw Nation Honor Guard 9:20 am Tribal Advisory Committee (TAC) Business and Tribal Support Unit (TSU) Briefing Update TSU developmental work and the recent evaluation of the Winter 2017 TAC meeting • Roll Call—Priyanka Oza, Public Health Advisor, TSU, OSTLTS, CDC • Reading of TAC Roles & Responsibilities—Chester Antone (Tohono O’odham Nation), Councilman, Tohono O’odham Nation; TAC Chair • Welcome from the Designated Federal Official—José T. Montero, MD, MHCDS, Director, OSTLTS; Deputy Director for State, Tribal, Local and Territorial Support, CDC • Presentation of TAC business items— Captain Carmen Clelland, PharmD, MPA (Cheyenne and Arapaho Tribes), US Public Health Service (USPHS); Associate Director for Tribal Support, OSTLTS, CDC Commander Damion Killsback, PharmD, MPH (Northern Cheyenne Tribe), USPHS; Deputy Associate Director for Tribal Support, OSTLTS, CDC 9:50 am CDC Office of the Director Updates Agency-wide activities
    [Show full text]
  • One Hamburger at a Time
    “One Hamburger at a Time”: Revisiting the State-Society Divide with the Seminole Tribe of Florida and Hard Rock international: with CA comments by Thabo Mokgatlha and Kgosi Leruo Molotlegi Author(s): Jessica R. Cattelino Source: Current Anthropology, Vol. 52, No. S3, Corporate Lives: New Perspectives on the Social Life of the Corporate Form: Edited by Damani J. Partridge, Marina Welker, and Rebecca Hardin (Supplement to April 2011), pp. S137-S149 Published by: The University of Chicago Press on behalf of Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/656556 . Accessed: 22/04/2011 15:01 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at . http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=ucpress. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive.
    [Show full text]
  • Prevention & Recovery
    Living Proud & Culturally Strong IN THIS ISSUE - TABLE OF CONTENTS FALL2012 BACK TO 1 - Young Leaders Shaping Communities SCHOOL 3 - The Tribal Law & Order Act 4 - The Bureau of Indian Education Prevention - Youth Council 5 - Family & Child Education 6 - U.S. Cabinet Member Visits Reservation &A Multi-Agency Recovery Alcohol and Substance Abuse 7 - Events/Resources & Services Prevention Collaboration 8 - Sam Uley, Strengthening Our Nation - Announcements “To the Creator: Give us the strength, the courage, the compassion, and the confidence to do the 9 right thing.” --Pete Conway, Billings IHS Director [At the Billings Child Protection Conference 4/20/10] - Violence Against Women Act AND 12 Helpful Links A Quarterly Newsletter Volume 2, Number 1 Fall 2012 Enrich Young Leaders Shaping Their Communities Penobscot to Qagan Tayagungin—to en- gage in a weeklong program under a theme inspired by Native youth from previous summits, 2010 and 2011, Young Leaders Shaping Their Communities. The 2012 National Intertribal Youth Summit, hosted by the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, U.S. Department of Justice, was planned by a team of Federal partners, including more than 25 offices from within 11 Federal agencies, including the Executive Office of the President, the U.S. Departments of Agriculture, Education, Health and Human Services, Housing and Urban Development, Interior, Justice, U.S. Census Bureau, the Office of National Drug Control Policy, the Environment and Natural Resources Division, the U.S. Small Business Administration’s Office of Indian Affairs, and the Corporation for National and Community Service. Two Group photo in front of the 4-H Youth Conference Center non-Federal partners, the Casey Family Programs and the Center for Native Photo courtesy of Sarah Pearson American Youth at the Aspen Institute also participated in Summit planning.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 7 Comanche Historical Ethnography And
    Chapter 7 Comanche Historical Ethnography and Ethnohistory ______________________________________________________ 7.1 Introduction The earliest mention of the Comanche in the historical record date to 1706. Comanche ethnogenesis took place about two centuries earlier, after their separation from the Shoshone near the Wind River region. In a step-wise migration bands left the parent society and moved south along the eastern flank of the Rocky Mountains. Initially Comanche bands inhabited the central plains along the Platte, Republican, and Arkansas rivers in eastern Colorado. According to numerous scholars, the Comanche quickly transitioned from a Great Basin culture to a Great Plains life way, although the Comanche retained many Great Basin cultural beliefs and practices.1 However seeking greater trade opportunities and horses, along with the rapidly changing political economic conditions, Comanche bands migrated southeast. By the latter part of the eighteenth century the Comanche consolidated their position on the southern Great Plains after a series of territorial and economic conflicts various tribes and the Spanish.2 Strategically employing warfare, treaty negotiations, and alliances the Comanche controlled the region between the Arkansas and Pecos rivers, an area comprising present-day western Texas and Oklahoma, eastern New Mexico, southeast Colorado, and southwest Kansas.3 By 1820 the Comanche occupied primarily the territory south of the Arkansas River, while the Cheyenne and Arapaho occupied the lands north of the river.4 They controlled this region until the reservation period. The Comanche were never a tribe, unified under a centralized political structure. Rather Comanche ethnicity and social unity was based on common cultural traditions, 600 language, history, and political economic goals.
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to Tracing American Indian & Alaska Native Ancestry
    U.S. Department of the Interior A Guide to Tracing American Indian & Alaska Native Ancestry Office of Public Affairs-Indian Affairs 1849 C Street, N.W., MS-3658-MIB Washington, D.C. 20240 202-208-3710 www.indianaffairs.gov Establishing American Indian or Alaska Native (AI/AN) Ancestry There are many reasons why a person will seek to establish his or her ancestry as that of AI/AN. One may be because the person wants to become an enrolled member of a federally recognized tribe. Another may be a desire to verify a family tradition or belief that has been passed down from generation to generation, whether based on fact or fiction, that he or she descends from an AI/AN person or tribal community. Another could be a desire only to learn more about a family’s history. Another may be to establish eligibility for public or private sector services or benefits that are believed to be provided only to persons who are AI/AN. When establishing descent from an AI/AN tribe for membership and enrollment purposes, however, an individual must provide genealogical documentation that supports his or her claim of such ancestry from a specific tribe or tribal community. Such documentation must prove that the individual is a lineal descendent of an individual whose name can be found on the tribal membership roll of the federally recognized tribe from which the individual is claiming descent and is seeking to enroll. If the end goal for doing such research is to help you determine if you are eligible for membership in a tribe, you must be able to: 1) establish that you have a lineal ancestor – biological parent, grandparent, great-grandparent and/or more distant ancestor – who is an American Indian or Alaska Native person from a federally recognized tribe in the U.S., 2) identify which tribe (or tribes) your ancestor was a member of or affiliated with, and 3) document your relationship to that person using vital statistics records and other records a tribe may require or accept for purposes of enrollment.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3 Arapaho Ethnohistory and Historical
    Chapter 3 Arapaho Ethnohistory and Historical Ethnography ______________________________________________________ 3.1 Introduction The Arapaho believe they were the first people created on earth. The Arapaho called themselves, the Hinanae'inan, "Our Own Kind of People.”1 After their creation, Arapaho tradition places them at the earth's center. The belief in the centrality of their location is no accident. Sociologically, the Arapaho occupied the geographical center among the five ethnic distinct tribal-nations that existed prior to the direct European contact.2 3.2 Culture History and Territory Similar to many other societies, the ethnic formation of the Arapaho on the Great Plains into a tribal-nation was a complex sociological process. The original homeland for the tribe, according to evidence, was the region of the Red River and the Saskatchewan River in settled horticultural communities. From this original homeland various Arapaho divisions gradually migrated southwest, adapting to living on the Great Plains.3 One of the sacred objects, symbolic of their life as horticulturalists, that they carried with them onto the Northern Plains is a stone resembling an ear of corn. According to their oral traditions, the Arapaho were composed originally of five distinct tribes. 4 Arapaho elders remember the Black Hills country, and claim that they once owned that region, before moving south and west into the heart of the Great Plains. By the early nineteenth century, the Arapaho positioned themselves geographically from the two forks of the Cheyenne River, west of the Black Hills southward to the eastern front 87 of the central Rocky Mountains at the headwaters of the Arkansas River.5 By 1806 the Arapaho formed an alliance with the Cheyenne to resist against further intrusion west by the Sioux beyond the Missouri River.
    [Show full text]
  • Kiowa and Cheyenne's Story
    Kiowa and Cheyenne's Story Along the Santa Fe Trail My life changed forever along the Santa Fe Trail. It was hot August 2, 2003 as my family traveled homeward to Littleton, Colorado from a family vacation through Kansas. This side of Dodge City my husband, Jeff, nine-year-old Michael and seven-year-old Stacia and I debated whether or not to stop at a Point of Interest close to the highway. It was educational and free, so, why not, we stopped. The parking lot was completely empty except for an elderly man sitting on a bench and two skinny dogs close by him. As we headed up the trail leading to a sign explaining the local history, the dogs approached us. We glanced at the man for permission to pet the dogs. He just smiled in silence. We petted their thin sides, receiving kisses in return. The brown Boxer mix and the black Lab wearily followed us up the trail, laying down each time we stopped. After a brief rabbit chase, both dogs returned, following us back to the dry, dusty parking lot. I told the man to call his dogs since we were leaving. He said they weren‛t his. But, they had to be; no one else was around. I called him a liar and we began arguing! A Winnebago arrived and Jeff asked if the dogs belonged to them. No. The old man kept telling me to take the dogs. Finally Jeff whispered to me that the dogs didn‛t act like they knew the old man any better than they did us.
    [Show full text]
  • Arizona & New Mexico
    THE MOST DEPEN DABLE way to and from The partnership between Southeastern Freight Lines and Central Arizona Freight offers you the unique combination of the premium LTL service providers in the ARIZONA & Southwest States of Arizona and New Mexico and the Southeast and Southwest. NEW MEXICO Why Central Arizona Freight? “Simply offer the best when it comes to Quality Service” • Privately Owned • Union-Free • Full data connectivity to provide complete shipment visibility • Premiere LTL carrier in Arizona and New Mexico • 60% of shipments deliver before noon t Times Transi Sample 1 hoenix aso to P El P que 3 buquer is to Al Memph 3 gman s to Kin Dalla 4 uerque Albuq iami to 4 M Tucson rlotte to Cha 4 well to Ros Atlanta Customer Testimonial: “Harmar uses Southeastern Freight Lines through your direct service and your partnership service. We ship throughout the United States, and Puerto Rico. A lot of our business moves into the Southwest, which is serviced by your partner Central Ari - zona Freight. Before we gave this business to you guys, we were using another carrier for these moves. We were experiencing service issues. We decided to make a switch to your company and their partner. Since we made the change, the service issues have diminished greatly, if not gone away. Being able to get our customers their shipments on time and damage-free was worth the change. Thank you so much, Southeastern Freight Lines and Central Arizona Freight, for making our shipping operation seamless and non-event.” Kevin Kaminski, Director - Supply Chain & Strategic Sourcing Harmar CONTACT YOUR LOCAL SOUTHEASTERN www.sefl.com FREIGHT LINES OFFICE FOR RATES 1.800.637.7335.
    [Show full text]