Antibody Production

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Antibody Production Canadian Council on Animal Care guidelines on: antibody production This document, the CCAC guidelines on: antibody production, has been developed by the ad hoc subcommittee on immunological procedures of the Canadian Council on Animal Care (CCAC) Guidelines Committee: Dr Albert Clark, Queen's University (Chair) Dr Dean Befus, University of Alberta (Canadian Society for Immunology representative) Dr Pamela O'Hashi, University of Toronto Dr Fred Hart, Aventis Pasteur Dr Michael Schunk, Aventis Pasteur Dr Andrew Fletch, McMaster University Dr Gilly Griffin, Canadian Council on Animal Care In addition, the CCAC is grateful to the many individuals, organizations and associations that pro- vided comments on earlier drafts of this guidelines' document. In particular thanks are extended to: the Canadian Society of Immunology; the Canadian Association for Laboratory Animal Science and the Canadian Association for Laboratory Animal Medicine; Dr Terry Pearson, University of Victoria; Dr Mavanur Suresh, University of Alberta; Drs Ernest Olfert and Barry Ziola, University of Saskatchewan; and Dr Patricia Shewen, University of Guelph. © Canadian Council on Animal Care, 2002 ISBN: 0-919087-37-X Canadian Council on Animal Care 315-350 Albert Street Ottawa ON CANADA K1R 1B1 http://www.ccac.ca CCAC guidelines on: antibody production, 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS A. PREFACE . .1 E. REFERENCES . .20 B. INTRODUCTION . .2 1. General . .20 2. Polyclonal Antibody Production . .21 C. POLYCLONAL ANTIBODY PRODUCTION 3 3. Monoclonal Antibody Production . .25 3.1 Other useful references . .27 1. Animal Selection and Care . .3 3.2 Additional useful information . .27 2. Immunization Protocol . .6 3. Standard Operating Procedures . .6 F. GLOSSARY . .27 4. Immunogen Preparation . .6 5. Choice of Adjuvant . .7 6. Route of Injection . .9 7. Volume and Number of Injection APPENDIX A Sites . .10 8. Blood Collection . .12 COMMON ADJUVANTS . .31 9. Monitoring of Animals . .13 10. Disposition of the Animals . .13 APPENDIX B IMMUNIZATION – RECOMMENDED D. MONOCLONAL ANTIBODY ROUTES AND VOLUMES PRODUCTION . .14 (adapted from Leenars, et al., 1999) . .33 1. Animal Selection and Care . .16 2. Production of Hybridoma Clones . .17 APPENDIX C 3. Ascites Production . .17 STAGES OF MONOCLONAL 3.1 Priming . .17 ANTIBODY PRODUCTION . .35 3.2 Contamination . .18 3.3 Hybridoma implantation . .18 APPENDIX D 3.4 Monitoring the animals and endpoints . .19 INFORMATION ON IN VITRO 3.5 Ascites tumor growth . .19 TECHNIQUES FOR MONOCLONAL 3.6 Ascites fluid collection . .20 ANTIBODY PRODUCTION . .37 antibody production A. PREFACE on antibody production given in the 1991 CCAC policy statement on Acceptable The Canadian Council on Animal Care Immunological Procedures. (CCAC) is responsible for overseeing animal use in research, teaching and test- Many institutions already have excellent ing. In addition to the Guide to the Care and standard operating procedures (SOPs) in Use of Experimental Animals,Vol. 1, 2nd place for the production of both pAbs and Edn., 1993 and Vol. 2, 1984, which lay mAbs. These CCAC guidelines borrow down general principles for the care and much from the experience of these institu- use of animals, the CCAC also publishes tions, and from the recent international guidelines on issues of current and emerg- initiatives to refine protocols for antibody ing concerns. The CCAC guidelines on: production. antibody production is the fifth of this series, and has been developed by the CCAC ad The refinement of animal use in research, hoc subcommittee on immunological proce- teaching and testing is an ongoing process dures. which is never complete. The CCAC recog- nizes that in moving towards implementa- The purpose of this document is to present tion of these guidelines, considerable guidelines for production of both polyclonal expenditure may be involved; for example, (pAb) and monoclonal antibodies (mAb) that to establish central services for production assist investigators and research support of mAbs in vitro. As with the implementation personnel to achieve an acceptable of other CCAC guidelines, institutions must immunological result with minimal discom- recognize such expenditures as responsi- fort for the animals involved. These guide- bilities if sound humane research is to be lines are also provided to assist animal carried out within their facilities. The CCAC care committee (ACC) members to evaluate is committed to assisting institutions by protocols involving the production of providing information on production of mAbs antibodies, to ensure that the highest in vitro as well as on best practices for standards of animal care and use are met. animal-based production for pAbs and These guidelines supercede the guidance mAbs where necessary. B. INTRODUCTION and from a single animal over time. There- fore, pAbs have a finite availability and are Antibodies are produced by the immune subject to possible character change during system of an animal in a specific response the period of production. On the other hand, to a challenge by an immunogen. The monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are derived immune system acts through two principal from a single clone and hence are specific mechanisms: humoral type responses for a single epitope and have a defined (production of antibodies) and cell-mediated affinity for that epitope. Thus if the right responses. Immunogens (antigens) are mAb is obtained, it can be extremely speci- molecules which can induce a specific fic for the relevant immunogen, and under immune response and are usually foreign appropriate conditions, an almost limitless production of a constant product is possible. ccac guidelines proteins or carbohydrates, or sometimes lipids and nucleic acids. The immune systems of mammals are comprised Polyclonal antisera can be obtained in a of large numbers of lymphocytes, each relatively short time frame (1-2 months), in characterized by its unique antigen-receptor contrast to standard mAb production specificity. This receptor diversity permits procedures that can be tedious and require immune responses to a broad range of 3-6 months. (Newer procedures, however, immunogens. The B lymphocytes, charac- can shorten the time for mAb derivation to terized by the presence of specific immuno- as little as one month.) Polyclonal anti- globulin receptors on their surface, are bodies show different affinities for different responsible for production of the humoral epitopes and thus may demonstrate overall (antibody) response. Antibodies are secret- excellent binding achieved by adherence to ed from plasma cells which have differen- a number of different sites on a complex tiated from B lymphocytes after appropriate immunogen or antigen. In contrast the stimulation by the foreign immunogen. single epitope specificity of mAbs may Each antibody molecule is capable of mean that a slight change in the structure of recognizing a specific epitope (antigenic the epitope, for example by antigen denatu- site), usually 5-6 amino acids or monosac- ration (such as occurs in immunoblotting charide units which are either linear or experiments or by sterilization of the topographically assembled, and is capable immunogen prior to injection into the of binding to this epitope. animal), can result in loss of antibody binding. For this reason two or three mAbs A polyclonal humoral response is comprised are sometimes combined. of antibodies, derived from various clonal populations having varying specificities (for Consideration should be given at the outset different epitopes, even on the same mole- to procuring commercially produced anti- cule), affinities and classes, and hence bodies from sources that comply with CCAC provides an effective defense against guidelines, or if international, are accredited pathogens. Polyclonal antisera are difficult by the Association for Assessment and to reproduce because of the variety of Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care, antibodies made in the polyclonal response. International (AAALAC). The Antibody The level and quality of the antibodies Resource Site http://www.antibodyresource. produced will vary from animal to animal, com may assist in this regard as well as 2 provide background information on antibody immunogens or antigens (Hanly, et al., production. A list of suppliers of mAbs 1995). A number of references to suitable produced in vitro has been compiled by the immunology texts are given in the reference Focus on Alternatives Group, UK, and a list: Abbas, et al., 2001; Anderson, 1999; second list of US suppliers has been com- Kuby, 2000; Roitt, et al., 1998; Sharon, piled by the Alternatives Research and 1998; Sompayrac, 1999. Development Foundation, US. Both lists antibody production, 2002 can be found at http://www.frame.org.uk/ General guideline: In the production of Monoclonal_Suppliers.htm. Additional polyclonal antibodies, the overriding material, for example SOPs, are available consideration must be to minimize pain on the CCAC website http://www.ccac.ca. and distress for the animals used. 1. Animal Selection and Care C. POLYCLONAL ANTIBODY PRODUCTION Guideline: Careful consideration should be given to the selection of the species Polyclonal antibodies (pAbs; antisera) have to be used for polyclonal antibody a number of uses in research, for example: production. for detection of molecules in ELISA-type assays; in Western blots; in immuno- Careful consideration should be given to the histochemical and immunoprecipitation appropriateness of the species and strain procedures; and in immunofluorescence
Recommended publications
  • Meningitis Manual Text
    Laboratory Methods for the Diagnosis of MENINGITIS Caused by Neisseria meningitidis, Streptococcus pneumoniae, and Haemophilus influenzae Centers for Disease Control and Prevention August, 1998 Laboratory Methods for the Diagnosis of Meningitis Caused by Neisseria meningitidis, Streptococcus pneumoniae, and Haemophilus influenzae Table of Contents Introduction………………………………………………………………………………… 1 Acknowledgments ……………………………………………………………………….. 2 I. Epidemiology of Meningitis Caused by Neisseria meningitidis, Haemophilus influenzae and Streptococcus pneumoniae,…………………………………………… 3 II. General Considerations ......................................................................................................... 5 A. Record Keeping ................................................................................................................... 5 III. Collection and Transport of Clinical Specimens ................................................................... 6 A. Collection of Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF)............................................................................... 6 A1. Lumbar Puncture ................................................................................................... 6 B. Collection of Blood .............................................................................................................. 7 B1. Precautions ............................................................................................................ 7 B2. Sensitivity of Blood Cultures ................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • SARS-Cov-2) (Coronavirus Disease [COVID-19]
    CPT® Category I and Proprietary Laboratory Analyses (PLA) Codes for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) (coronavirus disease [COVID-19]) Most recent changes to this medium descriptor document: • Addition of 8 Category I codes (0004A, 0051A, 0052A, 0053A, 0054A, 0064A, 91305, 91306) accepted by the CPT Editorial Panel. Codes 0004A, 0051A, 0052A, 0053A, 0054A, 0064A, 91305, 91306 and all related references will be published in CPT 2023. • Deleted codes in this document appear with a strikethrough. It is important to note that further CPT Editorial Panel or Executive Committee actions may affect these codes and/or descriptors. For this reason, code numbers and/or descriptor language in the CPT code set may differ at the time of publication. In addition, further Panel actions may result in gaps in code number sequencing. The following code was accepted at the March 2020 CPT Editorial Panel meeting for the 2021 CPT production cycle. This code is effective immediately on March 13, 2020. Released to Code Medium Code Descriptor Effective Publication AMA website ⚫87635 IADNA SARS-COV-2 COVID-19 AMPLIFIED PROBE TQ March 13, 2020 March 13, 2020 CPT® 2021 The following codes were accepted and revised at the April 2020 CPT Editorial Panel meeting for the 2021 CPT production cycle. These codes are effective immediately on April 10, 2020. IMMUNOASSAY INFECTIOUS AGT ANTIBODY 86318 QUAL/SEMIQUAN 1 STEP METH April 10, 2020 April 10, 2020 CPT® 2021 #⚫86328 IA INFECTIOUS AGT ANTIBODY SARS-COV-2 COVID-19 April 10, 2020 April 10, 2020 CPT® 2021 ⚫86769 ANTB SEVERE AQT RESPIR SYND SARS-COV-2 COVID- April 10, 2020 April 10, 2020 CPT® 2021 19 The following code was accepted by the Executive Committee of the CPT Editorial Panel.
    [Show full text]
  • Master Seed Testing in the Virology Section
    VIRSOP2007.04 Page 1 of 8 United States Department of Agriculture Center for Veterinary Biologics Standard Operating Policy/Procedure Master Seed Testing in the Virology Section Date: March 27, 2018 Number: VIRSOP2007.04 Supersedes: VIRSOP2007.03, October 10, 2014 Contact: Alethea M. Fry, (515) 337-7200 Sandra K. Conrad Peg A. Patterson Approvals: /s/Geetha B. Srinivas Date: 01Aug18 Geetha B. Srinivas, Section Leader Virology United States Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service P. O. Box 844 Ames, IA 50010 Mention of trademark or proprietary product does not constitute a guarantee or warranty of the product by USDA and does not imply its approval to the exclusion of other products that may be suitable. Entered into CVB Quality Management System by: /s/Linda S. Snavely 02Aug18 Linda S. Snavely Date Quality Management Program Assistant UNCONTROLLED COPY Center for Veterinary Biologics VIRSOP2007.04 Standard Operating Policy/Procedure Page 2 of 8 Master Seed Testing in the Virology Section Table of Contents 1. Purpose/Scope 2. Prerequisites for Master Seed Extraneous Agent Testing 2.1 Master Seed historical information 2.2 Substrate purity requirements 2.3 Testing of Master Seed consisting of persistently infected master cell stock 3. Testing Procedures for Detection of Extraneous Agents in Master Seeds 3.1 Neutralization of Master Seed 3.2 Passage of Master Seed in permissive cells or culture system 3.3 Detection of extraneous agents by fluorescent antibody (FA) staining 3.4 Detection of hemadsorbing agents 3.5 Detection of viral intracellular inclusions and related cellular changes by the hematoxylin and eosin staining method 3.6 Detection of Seneca Virus A (SVA) 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Perspectives on in Vitro Diagnostic Devices, Regulated by the Office Of
    1 2 “This transcript appears as received from the commercial transcribing service after inclusion of minor corrections to typographical and factual errors recommended by the Technical Point of Contact.” 1 PERSPECTIVES ON IN VITRO DIAGNOSTIC DEVICES, 2 REGULATED BY THE OFFICE OF BLOOD RESEARCH AND REVIEW 3 4 FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION 5 WHITE OAK CAMPUS 6 BUILDING 31 7 10903 NEW HAMPSHIRE AVENUE 8 SILVER SPRING, MARYLAND 20903 9 10 TUESDAY, JULY 16, 2019 11 8:30 A.M. 12 13 APPEARANCES: 14 MODERATOR: TERESITA C. MERCADO, MS 15 16 WELCOME: 17 JULIA LATHROP, PHD, DETTD/OBRR 18 19 INTRODUCTION: 20 WENDY PAUL, MD, DBCD/OBRR 21 22 PRESENTERS: 23 KIMBERLY BIGLER, MLS(ASCP)CMSBB, DBCD/OBRR 1 ANNETTE RAGOSTA, MT(ASCP)SBB, DBCD/OBRR 2 ZHUGONG "JASON" LIU, PHD, DRB/DBCD 3 4 CONFERENCE 5 TUESDAY, JULY 16, 2019 6 8:30 A.M. 7 DR. LATHROP: Okay, everybody. Thank you for coming to the second day of 8 our workshop which is going to be focused on considerations for IVDs regulated by the Division 9 of Blood Components and Devices in OBRR. 10 Again, the slides will be available on the website in about two weeks, so take a 11 look for them there. And moderating today’s session is Teresita Mercado from the Division. 12 MS. MERCADO: Good morning. Welcome to session three of the IVD 13 workshop. Our first speaker will be Dr. Wendy Paul. She is the deputy director of DBCD who 14 will give us an introduction to devices in DBCD. 15 DR.
    [Show full text]
  • Developmental Sequence and Intracellular Sites of Synthesis of Three Structural Protein Antigens of Influenza A2 Virus
    JOURNAL OF VIROLOGY, Feb. 1970, p. 153-164 Vol. 5, No. 2 Copyright © 1970 American Society for Microbiology Printed in U.S.A. Developmental Sequence and Intracellular Sites of Synthesis of Three Structural Protein Antigens of Influenza A2 Virus KOICHIRO MAENO1 AND EDWIN D. KILBOURNE Department of Microbiology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine of The City U iversity of New York, New York, New York 10049 Received for publication 17 September 1969 Specific antisera for hemagglutinin (HA) and neuraminidase antigens of in- fluenza A2 virus (A2E) were produced through the segregation of the two pro- teins in reciprocal viral recombinants of A2E and Aoe viruses. Gamma globulin frac- tions of these specific antisera and of antiserum specific for the nucleoprotein (NP) antigen of Aoe virus were conjugated with fluorescein isothiocyanate and employed to follow the synthesis of the three structural proteins in clone 1-5C-4 human aneuploid cells, with parallel measurement of serological and biological activity of the antigens by other techniques. In this system, NP antigen appeared first (at 3 hr) in the cell nucleus, whereas HA and neuraminidase appeared coincidentally, at 4 hr after infection, in the cytoplasm. The initial detectability of biological or complement-fixing activity of the proteins coincided with their demonstrability as stainable antigens. Late in infection, all three antigens were detected at the cell surface. Antibody specific for HA partially blocked the intracellular staining of neuraminidase and inhibited the enzymatic activity of both extracted and intact extracellular virus. These observations suggest the close intracytoplasmic proximity of the two envelope antigens and perhaps their initial association in a larger protein.
    [Show full text]
  • Polio Laboratory Manual
    WHO/IVB/04.10 ORIGINAL: ENGLISH Polio laboratory manual 4th edition, 2004 The World Health Organization has managed The evaluation of the impact of vaccine- cooperation with its Member States and preventable diseases informs decisions to provided technical support in the fi eld of introduce new vaccines. Optimal strategies vaccine-preventable diseases since 1975. and activities for reducing morbidity and In 2003, the offi ce carrying out this function mortality through the use of vaccines are was renamed the WHO Department of implemented (Vaccine Assessment and Immunization, Vaccines and Biologicals. Monitoring). The Department’s goal is the achievement Efforts are directed towards reducing fi nancial of a world in which all people at risk are and technical barriers to the introduction protected against vaccine-preventable of new and established vaccines and diseases. Work towards this goal can be immunization-related technologies (Access to visualized as occurring along a continuum. Technologies). The range of activities spans from research, development and evaluation of vaccines Under the guidance of its Member States, to implementation and evaluation of WHO, in conjunction with outside world immunization programmes in countries. experts, develops and promotes policies and strategies to maximize the use and delivery WHO facilitates and coordinates research of vaccines of public health importance. and development on new vaccines and Countries are supported so that they immunization-related technologies for viral, acquire the technical and managerial skills, bacterial and parasitic diseases. Existing competence and infrastructure needed to life-saving vaccines are further improved and achieve disease control and/or elimination new vaccines targeted at public health crises, and eradication objectives (Expanded such as HIV/AIDS and SARS, are discovered Programme on Immunization).
    [Show full text]
  • Monoclonal Antibodies As Tools to Combat Fungal Infections
    Journal of Fungi Review Monoclonal Antibodies as Tools to Combat Fungal Infections Sebastian Ulrich and Frank Ebel * Institute for Infectious Diseases and Zoonoses, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, D-80539 Munich, Germany; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 26 November 2019; Accepted: 31 January 2020; Published: 4 February 2020 Abstract: Antibodies represent an important element in the adaptive immune response and a major tool to eliminate microbial pathogens. For many bacterial and viral infections, efficient vaccines exist, but not for fungal pathogens. For a long time, antibodies have been assumed to be of minor importance for a successful clearance of fungal infections; however this perception has been challenged by a large number of studies over the last three decades. In this review, we focus on the potential therapeutic and prophylactic use of monoclonal antibodies. Since systemic mycoses normally occur in severely immunocompromised patients, a passive immunization using monoclonal antibodies is a promising approach to directly attack the fungal pathogen and/or to activate and strengthen the residual antifungal immune response in these patients. Keywords: monoclonal antibodies; invasive fungal infections; therapy; prophylaxis; opsonization 1. Introduction Fungal pathogens represent a major threat for immunocompromised individuals [1]. Mortality rates associated with deep mycoses are generally high, reflecting shortcomings in diagnostics as well as limited and often insufficient treatment options. Apart from the development of novel antifungal agents, it is a promising approach to activate antimicrobial mechanisms employed by the immune system to eliminate microbial intruders. Antibodies represent a major tool to mark and combat microbes. Moreover, monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are highly specific reagents that opened new avenues for the treatment of cancer and other diseases.
    [Show full text]
  • COVID-19 Infection, Vaccines, and Immunity—The Antibody Response Requires Detailed Analysis
    Opinion COVID-19 Infection, Vaccines, and Immunity—The Antibody Response Requires Detailed Analysis Nigel J. Dimmock School of Life Sciences, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK; [email protected]; Tel.: +44-(0)7788728910 Abstract: Current tests for antibodies specific for the SARS-CoV-2 S protein say nothing about their precise epitope specificities. These data are needed to properly assess the immune status of individuals following infection or vaccination, and the risk posed by virus variants. Keywords: SARS-CoV-2; COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2 S protein; human neutralizing antibodies; epitope specificity; epitope mapping Assessment of immune responses to SARS-CoV-2, the virus responsible for COVID-19, is based almost entirely on the antibody response, and apart from clinical trials, compar- isons of the merits of one vaccine versus another, or of the first jab versus the second, or the immunity of individuals resulting from infection are all based on antibodies specific for the viral spike or S protein. Broadly speaking such antibodies are measured by a lateral flow test or similar in which antibody binds to the viral S protein, a test which is fast but non-quantitative and gives no indication of antibody function. Alternatively, there is the more labour-intensive neutralization test which measures the ability of antibody to inhibit Citation: Dimmock, N.J. virus infectivity in cell culture, under conditions that do not mimic the in vivo situation. COVID-19 Infection, Vaccines, and Both types of tests give information of limited value and say nothing about the epitope Immunity—The Antibody Response specificity of antibodies present.
    [Show full text]
  • Serological Methods in the Identification and Characterization of Viruses
    CHAPTER 4 Serological Methods in the Identification and Characterization of Viruses M. H. V. Van Regenmortel Laboratoire de Virologie Institut de Biologie Mo!eculaire et Cellulaire 67000 Strasbourg, France 1. INTRODUCTION The purpose of this chapter is to present an integrated view of the various serological techniques that have been used in virology. The accent will be placed on the principles that govern each type of test and on the general applicability of the different serological techniques in all fields of virus research. In recent years, advances in serological tech­ niques have sometimes been applied in only one area of virology, although they could have been equally useful to workers studying other groups of viruses. No doubt this stems from the host-oriented approach that has guided the compartmentation of virology into separate fields of specialization. When it comes to serological properties, however, the similarities between animal, insect, bacterial, and plant viruses are paramount. The same immunochemical principles govern the in vitro serological reactions of all viral antigens, and much of general interest can be learned from the findings obtained with each particular group of viruses. An attempt will be made here to emphasize the general validity of specific experimental procedures. A number of recent reviews restricted to the serology of particular groups of viruses are available 183 H. Fraenkel-Conrat et al. (eds.), Comprehensive Virology © Plenum Press, New York 1981 184 Chapter 4 (Cowan, 1973; Schmidt and Lennette, 1973; Ball, 1974; Kurstak and Morisset, 1974; Burns and Allison, 1975; Mazzone and Tignor, 1976; Mayr et al., 1977; Tyrrell, 1978; Van Regenmortel, 1978; Cooper, 1979).
    [Show full text]
  • Estonian Statistics on Medicines 2016 1/41
    Estonian Statistics on Medicines 2016 ATC code ATC group / Active substance (rout of admin.) Quantity sold Unit DDD Unit DDD/1000/ day A ALIMENTARY TRACT AND METABOLISM 167,8985 A01 STOMATOLOGICAL PREPARATIONS 0,0738 A01A STOMATOLOGICAL PREPARATIONS 0,0738 A01AB Antiinfectives and antiseptics for local oral treatment 0,0738 A01AB09 Miconazole (O) 7088 g 0,2 g 0,0738 A01AB12 Hexetidine (O) 1951200 ml A01AB81 Neomycin+ Benzocaine (dental) 30200 pieces A01AB82 Demeclocycline+ Triamcinolone (dental) 680 g A01AC Corticosteroids for local oral treatment A01AC81 Dexamethasone+ Thymol (dental) 3094 ml A01AD Other agents for local oral treatment A01AD80 Lidocaine+ Cetylpyridinium chloride (gingival) 227150 g A01AD81 Lidocaine+ Cetrimide (O) 30900 g A01AD82 Choline salicylate (O) 864720 pieces A01AD83 Lidocaine+ Chamomille extract (O) 370080 g A01AD90 Lidocaine+ Paraformaldehyde (dental) 405 g A02 DRUGS FOR ACID RELATED DISORDERS 47,1312 A02A ANTACIDS 1,0133 Combinations and complexes of aluminium, calcium and A02AD 1,0133 magnesium compounds A02AD81 Aluminium hydroxide+ Magnesium hydroxide (O) 811120 pieces 10 pieces 0,1689 A02AD81 Aluminium hydroxide+ Magnesium hydroxide (O) 3101974 ml 50 ml 0,1292 A02AD83 Calcium carbonate+ Magnesium carbonate (O) 3434232 pieces 10 pieces 0,7152 DRUGS FOR PEPTIC ULCER AND GASTRO- A02B 46,1179 OESOPHAGEAL REFLUX DISEASE (GORD) A02BA H2-receptor antagonists 2,3855 A02BA02 Ranitidine (O) 340327,5 g 0,3 g 2,3624 A02BA02 Ranitidine (P) 3318,25 g 0,3 g 0,0230 A02BC Proton pump inhibitors 43,7324 A02BC01 Omeprazole
    [Show full text]
  • Studies on Influenzal Meningitis
    STUDIES ON INFLUENZAL MENINGITIS 1. THE PROBLEMS O~ SPECIFIC THERAPY* BY HUGH K. WARD, M.B., AND JOYCE WRIGHT, B.M., B.Cm (From tke Department of Bacteriology and Immunology of tke Harvard University Medical Sckool, Boston) (Received for publication, November 9, 1931) INTRODUCTION Whatever the relation of Pfeiffer's Bacillus influenzae to epidemic in- fluenza-and that is not under discussion here there is no doubt that this organism is the cause of influenzal meningitis, a disease that is much more common than is generally realized. The records of The Children's Hospital, Boston, disclose that in the last 5 years there have been 56 cases of meningococcus meningitis and 25 cases of influenzal meningitis in children under 2 years of age. In both diseases the cases have occurred only sporadically during this period. Influenzal meningitis is a disease of infancy and early childhood and is almost always fatal. Rivers (1), in an analysis from the literature of 220 cases under 2 years of age, gives k mortality of 92 per cent. It is remarkable that no record can be found of any attempt being made to treat these cases with an appropriate antiserum, despite the striking results that have been obtained with antimeningococcus serum. Woll- stein (2) in 1911 injected antiserum intraspinally 24 hours after she had infected a rhesus monkey, the animal recovering, but no account can be found of the use of this serum in human cases. Rivers (3) has pointed out, and this has been our own experience, that the strains of the influenza bacillus that are found in influenzal meningitis are fairly homogeneous, thus simplifying the problem of specific serum treat- ment.
    [Show full text]
  • USEPA MANUAL of METHODS for VIROLOGY - EPA Publication EPA/600/4-84/013 (R-12)
    xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx The following is an electronic text form of CHAPTER 12 of the USEPA MANUAL OF METHODS FOR VIROLOGY - EPA publication EPA/600/4-84/013 (R-12). The hardcopy form of this chapter can be obtained by contacting: Dr. Robert S. Safferman National Exposure Research Laboratory U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 26 West M.L. King Dr. Cincinnati OH 45268 USA e-mail: [email protected] Date of Publication (in Revised Form): May 1988 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx CHAPTER 12 IDENTIFICATION OF ENTEROVIRUSES 1. INTRODUCTION A neutralization test used to identify enteroviruses is described in this chapter. The test utilizes reference-typing sera directed against isolated waterborne viruses. This renders the viruses noninfectious when treated with a matching serotype reagent. Virus inactivation is ascertained microscopically by observing the absence of host cell destruction in the presence of the virus-antibody mixture. The procedure consists of simultaneously inoculating virus and antiserum into a microtiter plate, incubating the virus-antibody mixture for 2 hr, adding a suspension of host cells to the mixture, incubating the host cells-virus-antibody mixture for three days, then examining the cells daily for five more days for the absence of cytopathic effects (CPE). The test utilizes the Lim Benyesh-Melnick (LB-M) antiserum pools which consist of 61 equine antisera. They include LB-M antiserum pools A-H for the identification of 41 enteroviruses, a single antiserum preparation for the identification of coxsackievirus B3 and LB-M pools J-P for the identification of 19 group A coxsackieviruses not identified by pools A-H. The A-H antiserum pools, prepared by Melnick and coworkers (1973), with instructions for rehydration and storage and with virus identification tables, had been previously available from the National Institutes of Health (NIH).
    [Show full text]