Neutralizing Monoclonal Antibodies for Treatment of COVID-19

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Neutralizing Monoclonal Antibodies for Treatment of COVID-19 REVIEWS Neutralizing monoclonal antibodies for treatment of COVID-19 Peter C. Taylor 1 ✉ , Andrew C. Adams2, Matthew M. Hufford2, Inmaculada de la Torre2, Kevin Winthrop3 and Robert L. Gottlieb 4,5 Abstract | Several neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) have been developed and are now under evaluation in clinical trials. With the US Food and Drug Administration recently granting emergency use authorizations for neutralizing mAbs in non-hospitalized patients with mild-to- moderate COVID-19, there is an urgent need to discuss the broader potential of these novel therapies and to develop strategies to deploy them effectively in clinical practice, given limited initial availability. Here, we review the precedent for passive immunization and lessons learned from using antibody therapies for viral infections such as respiratory syncytial virus, Ebola virus and SARS-CoV infections. We then focus on the deployment of convalescent plasma and neutralizing mAbs for treatment of SARS- CoV-2. We review specific clinical questions, including the rationale for stratification of patients, potential biomarkers, known risk factors and temporal considerations for optimal clinical use. To answer these questions, there is a need to understand factors such as the kinetics of viral load and its correlation with clinical outcomes, endogenous antibody responses, pharmacokinetic properties of neutralizing mAbs and the potential benefit of combining antibodies to defend against emerging viral variants. 3–5 Monoclonal antibodies In the midst of the current COVID-19 pandemic, a combination therapy . Therefore, several questions (mAbs). Clonal antibodies variety of prophylactic and therapeutic treatments are need to be addressed about the potential clinical use of recognizing a single epitope on being developed or repurposed to combat COVID-19. neutralizing SARS-CoV-2 mAbs: who should get them; an antigen. Generally used in Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) that can bind to and ‘neu- what is the best dose and frequency; when in the course reference to recombinant sources. tralize’ the virus in infected patients are a novel class of of the infection will they be most effective; what is the antiviral intervention1,2. Neutralizing mAbs are recom- duration of the protection they provide; and what is their binant proteins that can be derived from the B cells associated benefit- to- risk ratio? In addition, neutraliz- of convalescent patients or humanized mice (FIg. 1). ing mAbs may have a prophylactic role in individuals High- throughput screening of these B cells permits the deemed to be at high risk of severe COVID-19. Indeed, identification of antibodies with the necessary specificity preliminary non- peer- reviewed preprint data suggest and affinity to bind to a virus and block entry of the virus, that mAbs prevent COVID-19 in high- risk individuals 1Botnar Research Centre, University of Oxford, therefore abrogating pathology associated with produc- potentially exposed to SARS- CoV-2 in nursing homes 6,7 Oxford, UK. tive infection. These mAbs are termed ‘neutralizing’ and or within households . 2Eli Lilly and Company, can ultimately be used as a type of passive immunotherapy While vaccines remain the best strategy to prevent Indianapolis, IN, USA. (detailed later) to minimize virulence. In this Review, COVID-19, mAbs could potentially benefit certain 3Oregon Health & Science we highlight the relative value that neutralizing mAbs vulnerable populations before or after exposure to University, Portland, can provide for patients and physicians, and go on to SARS-CoV-2, such as the unvaccinated or recently vacci- OR, USA. examine the role of these agents among the spectrum of nated high- risk patients. The antiviral activity seen with 4Baylor University Medical potential treatments for COVID-19. neutralizing mAb treatment emphasizes the importance Center, Dallas, TX, USA. In the United States, three anti- severe acute res- of early intervention to help counter the devastating 5 Baylor Scott & White piratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS- CoV-2) mAb impact the virus has had in such vulnerable populations Research Institute, Dallas, emergency use authorization TX, USA. therapies have been granted and in other high-risk patients. However, mAbs are com- ✉e- mail: peter.taylor@ (EUA) for treatment of non- hospitalized patients plicated to produce and may be limited in initial supply. kennedy.ox.ac.uk with mild- to- moderate COVID-19 — these are bam- Furthermore, any protection offered would be tempo- https://doi.org/10.1038/ lanivimab as a monotherapy, and bamlanivimab together rary, and the duration of effective protection remains s41577-021-00542- x with etesevimab or casirivimab with imdevimab as a to be determined. Answers to these questions will allow 382 | JUNE 2021 | VOLUME 21 www.nature.com/nri 0123456789();: REVIEWS Process Search Sequence and identity Analyse Select Source material Screening for RBD-specific Cloning and expression Validate and characterize single B cells High-confidence Convalescent sequences clustered patient by sequence identity Binding validation Functional validation Multiplexed bead-based assay Stability Live cell-based Humanized mouse assay that received Clonal families Organization target antigen Fluorescence-activated single-cell sorting Affinity Fig. 1 | Neutralizing monoclonal antibodies: identification, selection and production. The neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) given emergency use authorization for treatment of COVID-19 were derived from either convalescent patients or humanized mice exposed to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS- CoV-2) antigens. However, mAbs can be generated by multiple methods, including from vaccinated individuals (not depicted here). The pathways of mAb generation depicted here converge in the process of selection and production. RBD, receptor-binding domain. the most efficacious use of these novel and potentially be convenient and adaptable for use in resource- poor life- saving treatments, as we discuss herein. settings14 and can be rapidly deployed to combat novel Passive immunotherapy virus outbreaks. The introduction of monoclonal Passive immunization The antipathogen antibodies from convalescent or polyclonal antibodies More than 125 years ago, the first major success in plasma can mitigate infection by two main mecha- derived from non- human or human blood products to modern immunological intervention was developed: a nisms: namely, antibody effector activity and pathogen provide protection against therapeutic serum from animals actively immunized neutralization. However, in rare cases, pathogen-specific infection or envenomation. against diphtheria toxin8,9. Paul Ehrlich later produced antibodies can augment virulence in a process termed a seminal article tying the curative antiserum to neu- ‘antibody- dependent enhancement’ (ADE) (Fig. 2). Emergency use 10 authorization tralizing antibodies . Today, passive immunization ADE can occur via two distinct mechanisms. First, (EUA). A mechanism to involves infusion of antigen- specific mAbs or polyclonal pathogen- specific antibodies could increase infec- facilitate the availability antibodies derived from non- human or human blood tion by promoting virus uptake and replication in and use of medical products. While polyclonal antibodies collected from Fcγ receptor- expressing immune cells (for example, countermeasures during a immunized animals are the primary source of antisera, as is seen in dengue haemorrhagic virus infection of public health emergency. US Food and Drug Administration there is a risk of ‘serum sickness’, especially after repeated macrophages). With SARS- CoV and SARS- CoV-2 20 issuance of an EUA permits the exposures, as the recipient may generate an immune (REF. ), in vitro evidence amassed to date indicate that use of unapproved medical response against antibodies of non-human origin. These these non- lymphotropic coronaviruses are unable to products or unapproved uses risks are mitigated with the use of convalescent plasma productively replicate within haematopoietic cells21. of approved medical products when no adequate alternatives from human patients. With careful screening (for exam- Alternatively, ADE can be mediated via increased are available. ple, to assess for the presence of infectious agents and immune activation by Fc- mediated effector functions to establish antibody titre and neutralizing capacity), or immune complex formation22. In the case of respira- Convalescent plasma convalescent plasma therapy (CPT) can be effective with tory virus infections, the resulting immune cascade can therapy minimal safety risks. contribute to lung disease. While the hallmarks of severe (CPT). The administration of donated plasma from an Before the current pandemic, CPT was used to treat COVID-19 have features that overlap with this type 11,12 individual who has had an infections with influenza virus , respiratory syncytial of ADE, there is currently no definitive evidence to show illness and recovered from it virus (RSV)13, Ebola virus14 and other coronaviruses12,15–17. ADE occurs with SARS-CoV-2 infection22. (for example, previously CPT appears most efficacious when used early after Nonetheless, steps may be considered to mitigate the infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome the onset of symptoms, rather than during severe or potential risk of ADE. When feasible (as with neutral- 12,15,18 coronavirus 2 (SARS- CoV-2) prolonged infection
Recommended publications
  • Meningitis Manual Text
    Laboratory Methods for the Diagnosis of MENINGITIS Caused by Neisseria meningitidis, Streptococcus pneumoniae, and Haemophilus influenzae Centers for Disease Control and Prevention August, 1998 Laboratory Methods for the Diagnosis of Meningitis Caused by Neisseria meningitidis, Streptococcus pneumoniae, and Haemophilus influenzae Table of Contents Introduction………………………………………………………………………………… 1 Acknowledgments ……………………………………………………………………….. 2 I. Epidemiology of Meningitis Caused by Neisseria meningitidis, Haemophilus influenzae and Streptococcus pneumoniae,…………………………………………… 3 II. General Considerations ......................................................................................................... 5 A. Record Keeping ................................................................................................................... 5 III. Collection and Transport of Clinical Specimens ................................................................... 6 A. Collection of Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF)............................................................................... 6 A1. Lumbar Puncture ................................................................................................... 6 B. Collection of Blood .............................................................................................................. 7 B1. Precautions ............................................................................................................ 7 B2. Sensitivity of Blood Cultures ................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for Sotrovimab 500 Mg Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) Review
    Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for Sotrovimab 500 mg Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) Review Identifying Information Application Type EUA (EUA or Pre-EUA) If EUA, designate whether pre-event or intra-event EUA request. EUA Application EUA 000100 Number(s) Sponsor (entity EUA Sponsor requesting EUA or GlaxoSmithKline Research & Development Limited pre-EUA 980 Great West Road consideration), point Brentford Middlesex, TW8 9GS of contact, address, UK phone number, fax number, email GSK US Point of Contact address Debra H. Lake, M.S. Sr. Director Global Regulatory Affairs GlaxoSmithKline 5 Moore Drive PO Box 13398 Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-3398 (b) (6) Email: Phone Manufacturer, if GlaxoSmithKline, Parma. different from Sponsor Submission Date(s) Part 1: March 24, 2021 Part 2: March 29, 2021 Receipt Date(s) Part 1: March 24, 2021 Part 2: March 29, 2021 OND Division / Office Division of Antivirals /Office of Infectious Disease 1 Reference ID: 4802027 Product in the No Strategic National Stockpile (SNS) Distributor, if other (b) (4) than Sponsor I. EUA Determination/Declaration On February 4, 2020, the Secretary of Health and Human Services determined pursuant to section 564 of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic (FD&C) Act that there is a public health emergency that has a significant potential to affect national security or the health and security of United States (US) citizens living abroad and that involves a novel (new) coronavirus (nCoV) first detected in Wuhan City, Hubei Province, China in 2019 (2019-nCoV). The virus is now named SARS-CoV-2, which causes the illness COVID-19.
    [Show full text]
  • Mark Taylor; [email protected]; (317) 276-5795 (Media) Kevin Hern; Hern Kevin [email protected]; (317) 277-1838 (Investors)
    January 29, 2021 Eli Lilly and Company Lilly Corporate Center Indianapolis, Indiana 46285 U.S.A. +1.317.276.2000 www.lilly.com For Release: Immediately Refer to: Mark Taylor; [email protected]; (317) 276-5795 (Media) Kevin Hern; [email protected]; (317) 277-1838 (Investors) Lilly Reports Strong Fourth-Quarter and Full-Year 2020 Financial Results • Revenue in the fourth quarter of 2020 increased 22 percent, driven by volume growth of 24 percent. Excluding bamlanivimab revenue of $871 million, fourth-quarter 2020 revenue grew 7 percent. • Full-year 2020 revenue increased 10 percent, driven by volume growth of 15 percent. Excluding bamlanivimab, full-year 2020 revenue grew 6 percent, driven by volume growth of 11 percent. • Key growth products launched since 2014, consisting of Trulicity, Verzenio, Taltz, Tyvyt, Olumiant, Jardiance, Emgality, Cyramza, Retevmo, Baqsimi and Basaglar contributed nearly 12 percentage points of revenue growth and represented approximately 48 percent of total revenue in the fourth quarter of 2020, or 55 percent of total revenue excluding bamlanivimab. • Fourth-quarter 2020 operating expenses increased 3 percent, driven by higher research and development investments, including expenses of $265 million to develop COVID-19 therapies. • Notable pipeline events included Emergency Use Authorizations from the FDA for both bamlanivimab and baricitinib for the treatment of COVID-19, as well as positive data readouts for donanemab for Alzheimer's disease, tirzepatide for type 2 diabetes and LOXO-305 for cancer. • Fourth-quarter 2020 earnings per share (EPS) increased to $2.32 on a reported basis and $2.75 on a non- GAAP basis. Full year 2020 EPS decreased to $6.79 on a reported basis and increased to $7.93 on a non- GAAP basis.
    [Show full text]
  • Drug Information Center Highlights of FDA Activities
    Drug Information Center Highlights of FDA Activities – 3/1/21 – 3/31/21 FDA Drug Safety Communications & Drug Information Updates: Ivermectin Should Not Be Used to Treat or Prevent COVID‐19: MedWatch Update 3/5/21 The FDA advised consumers against the use of ivermectin for the treatment or prevention of COVID‐19 following reports of patients requiring medical support and hospitalization after self‐medicating. Ivermectin has not been approved for this use and is not an anti‐viral drug. Health professionals are encouraged to report adverse events associated with ivermectin to MedWatch. COVID‐19 EUA FAERS Public Dashboard 3/15/21 The FDA launched an update to the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) Public Dashboard that provides weekly updates of adverse event reports submitted to FAERS for drugs and therapeutic biologics used under an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) during the COVID‐19 public health emergency. Monoclonal Antibody Products for COVID‐19 – Fact Sheets Updated to Address Variants 3/18/21 The FDA authorized revised fact sheets for health care providers to include susceptibility of SARS‐CoV‐2 variants to each of the monoclonal antibody products available through EUA for the treatment of COVID‐19 (bamlanivimab, bamlanivimab and etesevimab, and casirivimab and imdevimab). Abuse and Misuse of the Nasal Decongestant Propylhexedrine Causes Serious Harm 3/25/21 The FDA warned that abuse and misuse of the nasal decongestant propylhexedrine, sold OTC in nasal decongestant inhalers, has been increasingly associated with cardiovascular and mental health problems. The FDA has recommended product design changes to support safe use, such as modifications to preclude tampering and limits on the content within the device.
    [Show full text]
  • SARS-Cov-2) (Coronavirus Disease [COVID-19]
    CPT® Category I and Proprietary Laboratory Analyses (PLA) Codes for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) (coronavirus disease [COVID-19]) Most recent changes to this medium descriptor document: • Addition of 8 Category I codes (0004A, 0051A, 0052A, 0053A, 0054A, 0064A, 91305, 91306) accepted by the CPT Editorial Panel. Codes 0004A, 0051A, 0052A, 0053A, 0054A, 0064A, 91305, 91306 and all related references will be published in CPT 2023. • Deleted codes in this document appear with a strikethrough. It is important to note that further CPT Editorial Panel or Executive Committee actions may affect these codes and/or descriptors. For this reason, code numbers and/or descriptor language in the CPT code set may differ at the time of publication. In addition, further Panel actions may result in gaps in code number sequencing. The following code was accepted at the March 2020 CPT Editorial Panel meeting for the 2021 CPT production cycle. This code is effective immediately on March 13, 2020. Released to Code Medium Code Descriptor Effective Publication AMA website ⚫87635 IADNA SARS-COV-2 COVID-19 AMPLIFIED PROBE TQ March 13, 2020 March 13, 2020 CPT® 2021 The following codes were accepted and revised at the April 2020 CPT Editorial Panel meeting for the 2021 CPT production cycle. These codes are effective immediately on April 10, 2020. IMMUNOASSAY INFECTIOUS AGT ANTIBODY 86318 QUAL/SEMIQUAN 1 STEP METH April 10, 2020 April 10, 2020 CPT® 2021 #⚫86328 IA INFECTIOUS AGT ANTIBODY SARS-COV-2 COVID-19 April 10, 2020 April 10, 2020 CPT® 2021 ⚫86769 ANTB SEVERE AQT RESPIR SYND SARS-COV-2 COVID- April 10, 2020 April 10, 2020 CPT® 2021 19 The following code was accepted by the Executive Committee of the CPT Editorial Panel.
    [Show full text]
  • Master Seed Testing in the Virology Section
    VIRSOP2007.04 Page 1 of 8 United States Department of Agriculture Center for Veterinary Biologics Standard Operating Policy/Procedure Master Seed Testing in the Virology Section Date: March 27, 2018 Number: VIRSOP2007.04 Supersedes: VIRSOP2007.03, October 10, 2014 Contact: Alethea M. Fry, (515) 337-7200 Sandra K. Conrad Peg A. Patterson Approvals: /s/Geetha B. Srinivas Date: 01Aug18 Geetha B. Srinivas, Section Leader Virology United States Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service P. O. Box 844 Ames, IA 50010 Mention of trademark or proprietary product does not constitute a guarantee or warranty of the product by USDA and does not imply its approval to the exclusion of other products that may be suitable. Entered into CVB Quality Management System by: /s/Linda S. Snavely 02Aug18 Linda S. Snavely Date Quality Management Program Assistant UNCONTROLLED COPY Center for Veterinary Biologics VIRSOP2007.04 Standard Operating Policy/Procedure Page 2 of 8 Master Seed Testing in the Virology Section Table of Contents 1. Purpose/Scope 2. Prerequisites for Master Seed Extraneous Agent Testing 2.1 Master Seed historical information 2.2 Substrate purity requirements 2.3 Testing of Master Seed consisting of persistently infected master cell stock 3. Testing Procedures for Detection of Extraneous Agents in Master Seeds 3.1 Neutralization of Master Seed 3.2 Passage of Master Seed in permissive cells or culture system 3.3 Detection of extraneous agents by fluorescent antibody (FA) staining 3.4 Detection of hemadsorbing agents 3.5 Detection of viral intracellular inclusions and related cellular changes by the hematoxylin and eosin staining method 3.6 Detection of Seneca Virus A (SVA) 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Monoclonal Antibody Playbook
    Federal Response to COVID-19: Monoclonal Antibody Clinical Implementation Guide Outpatient administration guide for healthcare providers 2 SEPTEMBER 2021 1 Introduction to COVID-19 Monoclonal Antibody Therapy 2 Overview of Emergency Use Authorizations 3 Site and Patient Logistics Site preparation Patient pathways to monoclonal administration 4 Team Roles and Responsibilities Leadership Administrative Clinical Table of 5 Monoclonal Antibody Indications and Administration Indications Contents Preparation Administration Response to adverse events 6 Supplies and Resources Infrastructure Administrative Patient Intake Administration 7 Examples: Sites of Administration and Staffing Patterns 8 Additional Resources 1 1. Introduction to Monoclonal Therapy 2 As of 08/13/21 Summary of COVID-19 Therapeutics 1 • No Illness . Health, no infections • Exposed Asymptomatic Infected . Scope of this Implementation Guide . Not hospitalized, no limitations . Monoclonal Antibodies for post-exposure prophylaxis (Casirivimab + Imdevimab (RGN)) – EUA Issued. • Early Symptomatic . Scope of this Implementation Guide . Not hospitalized, with limitations . Monoclonal Antibodies for treatment (EUA issued): Bamlanivimab + Etesevimab1 (Lilly) Casirivimab + Imdevimab (RGN) Sotrovimab (GSK/Vir) • Hospital Adminission. Treated with Remdesivir (FDA Approved) or Tocilizumab (EUA Issued) . Hospitalized, no acute medical problems . Hospitalized, not on oxygen . Hospitlaized, on oxygen • ICU Admission . Hospitalized, high flow oxygen, non-invasive ventilation
    [Show full text]
  • Pharmacy Market Outlook Highlights Keeping You at the Forefront of Drug Price Projections and Market Developments
    SUMMER 2021 Pharmacy Market Outlook Highlights Keeping you at the forefront of drug price projections and market developments VIZIENT CENTER FOR PHARMACY PRACTICE EXCELLENCE 1 Pharmacy Market Outlook Summer 2021 Highlights © 2021 Vizient, Inc. All rights reserved. Table of contents Overview Executive summary ......................................................................................................3 Key findings by segment Acute care ......................................................................................................................6 Projections by therapeutic class Specialty pharmaceuticals ..........................................................................................7 Pediatrics .......................................................................................................................8 Oncology ........................................................................................................................9 Infectious disease .......................................................................................................10 Immunomodulators and disease-modifying therapies ........................................11 Plasma products: Intravenous immune globin and albumin ................................12 New: diabetes-related medications .........................................................................13 Management of high-cost therapies Biologics and biosimilars ...........................................................................................14 The evolution
    [Show full text]
  • Journal Pre-Proof
    Journal Pre-proof Neutralizing monoclonal antibodies for COVID-19 treatment and prevention Juan P. Jaworski PII: S2319-4170(20)30209-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bj.2020.11.011 Reference: BJ 374 To appear in: Biomedical Journal Received Date: 2 September 2020 Revised Date: 6 November 2020 Accepted Date: 22 November 2020 Please cite this article as: Jaworski JP, Neutralizing monoclonal antibodies for COVID-19 treatment and prevention, Biomedical Journal, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bj.2020.11.011. This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. © 2020 Chang Gung University. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. TITLE: Neutralizing monoclonal antibodies for COVID-19 treatment and prevention Juan P. JAWORSKI Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Buenos Aires, Argentina Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria, Buenos Aires, Argentina KEYWORDS: SARS-CoV-2, Coronavirus, Monoclonal Antibody, mAb, Prophylaxis, Treatment CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Dr. Juan Pablo Jaworski, DVM, MSc, PhD. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas Instituto de Virología, Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria Las Cabañas y de los Reseros (S/N), Hurlingham (1686), Buenos Aires, Argentina Tel / Fax: 054-11-4621-1447 (int:3400) [email protected] ABSTRACT The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has caused unprecedented global health and economic crises.
    [Show full text]
  • Phage Display-Based Strategies for Cloning and Optimization of Monoclonal Antibodies Directed Against Human Pathogens
    Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2012, 13, 8273-8292; doi:10.3390/ijms13078273 OPEN ACCESS International Journal of Molecular Sciences ISSN 1422-0067 www.mdpi.com/journal/ijms Review Phage Display-based Strategies for Cloning and Optimization of Monoclonal Antibodies Directed against Human Pathogens Nicola Clementi *,†, Nicasio Mancini †, Laura Solforosi, Matteo Castelli, Massimo Clementi and Roberto Burioni Microbiology and Virology Unit, “Vita-Salute” San Raffaele University, Milan 20132, Italy; E-Mails: [email protected] (N.M.); [email protected] (L.S.); [email protected] (M.C.); [email protected] (M.C.); [email protected] (R.B.) † These authors contributed equally to this work. * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +39-2-2643-5082; Fax: +39-2-2643-4288. Received: 16 March 2012; in revised form: 25 June 2012 / Accepted: 27 June 2012 / Published: 4 July 2012 Abstract: In the last two decades, several phage display-selected monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have been described in the literature and a few of them have managed to reach the clinics. Among these, the anti-respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) Palivizumab, a phage-display optimized mAb, is the only marketed mAb directed against microbial pathogens. Palivizumab is a clear example of the importance of choosing the most appropriate strategy when selecting or optimizing an anti-infectious mAb. From this perspective, the extreme versatility of phage-display technology makes it a useful tool when setting up different strategies for the selection of mAbs directed against human pathogens, especially when their possible clinical use is considered.
    [Show full text]
  • Developmental Sequence and Intracellular Sites of Synthesis of Three Structural Protein Antigens of Influenza A2 Virus
    JOURNAL OF VIROLOGY, Feb. 1970, p. 153-164 Vol. 5, No. 2 Copyright © 1970 American Society for Microbiology Printed in U.S.A. Developmental Sequence and Intracellular Sites of Synthesis of Three Structural Protein Antigens of Influenza A2 Virus KOICHIRO MAENO1 AND EDWIN D. KILBOURNE Department of Microbiology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine of The City U iversity of New York, New York, New York 10049 Received for publication 17 September 1969 Specific antisera for hemagglutinin (HA) and neuraminidase antigens of in- fluenza A2 virus (A2E) were produced through the segregation of the two pro- teins in reciprocal viral recombinants of A2E and Aoe viruses. Gamma globulin frac- tions of these specific antisera and of antiserum specific for the nucleoprotein (NP) antigen of Aoe virus were conjugated with fluorescein isothiocyanate and employed to follow the synthesis of the three structural proteins in clone 1-5C-4 human aneuploid cells, with parallel measurement of serological and biological activity of the antigens by other techniques. In this system, NP antigen appeared first (at 3 hr) in the cell nucleus, whereas HA and neuraminidase appeared coincidentally, at 4 hr after infection, in the cytoplasm. The initial detectability of biological or complement-fixing activity of the proteins coincided with their demonstrability as stainable antigens. Late in infection, all three antigens were detected at the cell surface. Antibody specific for HA partially blocked the intracellular staining of neuraminidase and inhibited the enzymatic activity of both extracted and intact extracellular virus. These observations suggest the close intracytoplasmic proximity of the two envelope antigens and perhaps their initial association in a larger protein.
    [Show full text]
  • Frequently Asked Questions on the Emergency Use Authorization for Bamlanivimab and Etesevimab
    Frequently Asked Questions on the Emergency Use Authorization for Bamlanivimab and Etesevimab Q. What is an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA)? A: Under section 564 of the Federal Food, Drug & Cosmetic Act, after a declaration by the HHS Secretary based on one of four types of determinations, FDA may authorize an unapproved product or unapproved uses of an approved product for emergency use. In issuing an EUA, FDA must determine, among other things, that based on the totality of scientific evidence available, including data from adequate and well-controlled clinical trials, if available, it is reasonable to believe that the product may be effective in diagnosing, treating, or preventing a serious or life-threatening disease or condition caused by a chemical, biological, radiological, or nuclear agent; that the known and potential benefits, when used to treat, diagnose or prevent such disease or condition, outweigh the known and potential risks for the product; and that there are no adequate, approved, and available alternatives. Emergency use authorization is NOT the same as FDA approval or licensure. Q. What does this EUA authorize? A. The EUA authorizes Eli Lilly and Company’s (Lilly’s) bamlanivimab and etesevimab, administered together, for emergency use for both treatment and as post-exposure prophylaxis (prevention) of COVID-19. Treatment: Treatment of mild to moderate COVID-19 in adults and pediatric patients (12 years of age and older weighing at least 40 kg) with positive results of direct SARS-CoV-2 viral testing, and who are at high risk for progression to severe COVID-19, including hospitalization or death.
    [Show full text]