Federal Research and Technology for Aviation

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Federal Research and Technology for Aviation Federal Research and Technology for Aviation September 1994 OTA-ETI-610 NTIS order #PB95-109195 GPO stock #052-003-01391-6 Recommended Citation: U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment, Federal Research and Technology for Aviation, OTA–ETI-61O (Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, September 1994). For sale by the US. Government Printing Office Superintendent of Documenta, Mail Stop: SSOP, Washington, DC 20402-9328 Foreword ithin the United States, only the federal government has the re- sources to support large-scale, applied research and develop- ment programs for aviation safety and infrastructure. Federally sponsored aviation research has received considerable congres- sionalw attention in the last decade due to the need to modernize and expand the U.S. airspace system, address aircraft safety and environmental issues, and respond to terrorism threats against air travelers. The House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology and its Subcommittee on Competitive- ness and Technology (now the Subcommittee on Technology, Environment and Aviation) asked the Office of Technolog y Assessment to take a compre- hensive look at the federal R&D that underpins the Federal Aviation Ad- ministration’s technology and regulatory development programs. Long- term research efforts and airline economics were special concerns. The study was also endorsed by the House Subcommittee on Aviation of the Committee on Public Works and Transportation, and the House Subcom- mittee on Government Activities and Transportation of the Committee on Government Operations. This report focuses on research and technology policy issues for aviation operations: safety, security, environmental protection, and the air traffic system. Achievements in science and technology have helped make the U.S. air transportation system the safest and most efficient in the world, but the system could be improved further. However, operational success in the complex aviation system depends on more than technological advances. If technological solutions are to be more timely and useful, federal aviation R&D programs will need more effective approaches to priority setting and analysis, and more active participation by operational” experts. This is cru- cial for the air traffic system, where technology decisions have not always meshed with operational requirements. In this report, OTA identifies vari- ous initiatives that Congress and federal agencies could consider in setting the national aviation R&D agenda, restructuring the management process for air traffic system R&D, and clarifying FAA’s role in long-term research and in international standards development for an increasingly global avi- ation system. OTA appreciates the invaluable advice and assistance of the many people who contributed to this project, including the advisory panel, con- tractors, and reviewers. ROGER C. HERDMAN Director ,,, Ill Najeeb E. Halaby, Chairman David Haase Willard G. Plentl, Jr. Chairman Executive Central Air Safety Director Safair International Chairman Division of Aviation for North Air Line Pilots Association Carolina Robert W. Baker Executive Vice President, Jonathan Howe Robert W. Simpson Operations Attorney Director American Airlines, Inc. Zuckert, Scoutt & Rasenberger Flight Transportation Laboratory Massachusetts Institute of William F. Ball ha us, Jr. Noreene Koan Technology President Chairperson, National Air Safety Martin Marietta Aero & Naval Committee Richard Swauger Systems Association of Flight Attendants Air Traffic Consultant Robert A. Davis Richard Livingston Patricia F. Wailer Vice President, Engineering Consultant Director Boeing Commercial Airplane Transportation Research Institute Group T. Al Ian McArtor University of Michigan President Donald D. Engen FEDEX Aeronautics Corp. President AOPA Air Safety Foundation Clinton V. Oster, Jr. Professor Edmund S. Greenslet School of Public and President Environmental Affairs ESG Aviation Services Indiana University Note: OTA appreciates and is grateful for the valuable assistance and thoughtful critiques provided by the advisory panel members. The panel does not, however, necessarily approve, disapprove, or endorse this report. OTA- assumes fuII responsibility for the report and the accuracy of its contents. Preject Staff Peter Blair1 PRINCIPAL STAFF ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF Assistant Director KEVIN DOPART Marsha Fenn Industry, Commerce, and Project Director Editor International Security Division Kelley Scott Lillian Chapman John Andelin2 Principal Analyst Division Administrator Assistant Director Science, Information, and Daniel Cohen Gay Jackson Natural Resources Division Analyst PC Specialist Emilia L. Govan Gregory Wallace Tina Aikens Program Director Research Analyst Administrative Secretary Energy, Transportation, and Infrastructure Tamara Kowalski CONTRIBUTING STAFF Secretary Elizabeth Sheley In-House Contractor Jeanne Olivier Detailee, Port Authority of New York and New Jersey CONTRACTORS Dale Atkinson Global Aviation John Rhea Consultant Associates, Ltd. Consultant Andrew Pickens J. Lynn Helms Robert W. Simpson AVCOMM, Inc. International Consultants, Ltd. Flight Transportation Laboratory Massachusetts Institute of Technology Richard Golaszewski Michael J. Prather Rokaya A. A1-Ayat Gellman Research Department of Geosciences Institute of Transportation Studies Associates. Inc. University of California, University of California, Berkeley Irvine 1 After Augu\t 1993. 2 Through Au.gu\t 1993. Reviewers Thomas Accardi Terry Hertz Paul Polski Federal Aviation Administration National Aeronautics and Space Federal Aviation Administration Administration Jim Bryson Martin Pozesky U.S. Environmental Protection Mark Hofmann Federal Aviation Administration Agency Federal Aviation Administration Robert Rovinsky Frank J. Colson Herbert Jasper Federal Aviation Administration Department of Defense McManus Associates, Inc. Constantine Sarkos William B. Cotton Nicholas Krull Federal Aviation Administration United Airlines, Inc. Federal Aviation Administration Arthur Shrantz James L. Crook Mary Ann Kruslicky National Center for Atmospheric Air Traffic Control Association U.S. General Accounting Office Research Jack Durham Paul Larson David Swierenga U.S. Environmental Protection Federal Aviation Administration Air Transport Association of Agency America Alfred W. Lindsey John Fearnsides U.S. Environmental Protection Maris Vikmanis The Mitre Corp. Agency Wright-Patterson Air Force Base John Fischer David Lockwood Stein Weissenberger Congressional Research Service Global Aviation Associates, Ltd. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Richard Golaszewski John McLucas Gellman Research Associates, Aerospace Consultant Robert Whitehead Inc. National Aeronautics and Space David Morrissey Administration Ed Hazelwood Federal Aviation Administration ATC Market Report Carlton Wine Federal Aviation Administration John O’Brien Air Line Pilots Association c ontents 1 Summary and Policy Conclusions 1 Findings 9 Policy Conclusions 25 Conclusion 32 2 Institutional and Management Issues for Civil Aviation Research and Technology 35 Organizational Framework 35 Interagency Coordination on Aviation R&D 46 Technology Development and Implementation for ATC 52 Conclusions 69 3 Data and Analysis for Aviation R&D 73 Historical Payoffs of Aviation R&D 74 Weighing Current Issues 82 Issues in Setting Priorities 95 Predicting Future Problems 101 Federal Aviation Data and Assessment Resources 103 Conclusions 116 4 Research and Technology Issues 117 Crosscutting Research Issues 118 New Functions and Technology Options 130 Conclusions 156 5 Economic Issues for Aviation Operations 157 The U.S. Airline Industry 157 Air Traffic Control Equipment Manufacturing 172 Conclusions 174 APPENDIXES A Abbreviations 177 B Workshop Participants 181 INDEX 185 vii Summary and Policy Conclusions 1 mericans have extremely high, and often conflicting, ex- pectations for air transportation. We want plenty of flights to many destinations, but have little tolerance for aircraft A noise above our homes; we insist that airlines be as safe as possible, but demand ever lower ticket prices; and many of us want to leave or arrive at similar times, but are annoyed by con- gested roads and terminals and delayed flights. Compared with aviation systems around the world, U.S. air transportation comes closest to meeting this wide range of exact- ing standards (see figure 1-l). Benefiting from decades of public and private research and technology investment, passengers and freight can travel by air across the United States today more safe- ly, for less cost, and with less environmental impact than ever be- fore (see figure 1-2). Research and technology development have contributed to these positive results and now promise further gains. However, to better anticipate new safety and efficiency challenges to the aviation system and to promptly modernize the U.S. air traffic control (ATC) system federal aviation re- search and development (R&D) must encompass more than technology. The early and continuing advice of operational ex- perts must be part of this process, and operational issues, as well as technological ones, must be within its scope. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) plays a pivotal role in improving the performance of the aviation system. FAA’s 11 2 I Federal Research and Technology for Aviation Fatal accident record by region (Scheduled passenger flights, 1977-89) Operating costs for selected airlines (1991 ) 30 United States T_ 3 ■ Swissair North America II JAL Latin America
Recommended publications
  • Terrorism Incidents: Pan Am #73 Box: RAC Box 8
    Ronald Reagan Presidential Library Digital Library Collections This is a PDF of a folder from our textual collections. Collection: Counterterrorism and Narcotics, Office of, NSC: Records Folder Title: Terrorism Incidents: Pan Am #73 Box: RAC Box 8 To see more digitized collections visit: https://reaganlibrary.gov/archives/digital-library To see all Ronald Reagan Presidential Library inventories visit: https://reaganlibrary.gov/document-collection Contact a reference archivist at: [email protected] Citation Guidelines: https://reaganlibrary.gov/citing National Archives Catalogue: https://catalog.archives.gov/ WITHDRAWAL SHEET Ronald Reagan Library Collection Name COUNTERTERRORISM AND NARCOTICS, NSC: Withdrawer RECORDS SMF 9/30/2008 File Folder TERRORISM INCIDENTS: PAN AM #73 FO/A M2008-098/1 Box Number RACBOX8 STOCKER 3 ID Doc Type Document Description No of Doc Date Restrictions Pages 55924 BRIEFING RE PAN AM FLIGHT 73 HIJACKING 28 10/16/1986 Bl PAPER INCLUDING ENCLOSURES D 8/15/2006 F04-066 #6 Freedom of Information Act. [5 U.S.C. 552(b)) B-1 National security classified Information [(b)(1) of the FOIA] B-2 Release would disclose internal personnel rules and practices of an agency [(b)(2) of the FOIA] B-3 Release would violate a Federal statute [(b)(3) of the FOIA) B-4 Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential or financial information [(b)(4) of the FOIA) B-6 Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy [(b)(6) of the FOIA) B-7 Release would disclose information compiled for law enforcement purposes [(b)(7) of the FOIA) B-8 Release would disclose information concerning the regulation of financial institutions [(b)(B) of the FOIA) B-9 Release would disclose geological or geophysical information concerning wells [(b)(9) of the FOIA] C.
    [Show full text]
  • In-Cloud Icing and Supercooled Cloud Microphysics: from Reanalysis to Mesoscale Modeling
    UNIVERSITY OF QUEBEC AT CHICOUTIMI MANUSCRIPT-BASED THESIS PRESENTED TO UNIVERSITY OF QUEBEC AT CHICOUTIMI IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF PHILOSOPHIAE DOCTOR Ph.D. IN EARTH AND ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES OFFERED AT UNIVERSITY OF QUEBEC AT MONTREAL UNDER A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH THE UNIVERSITY OF QUEBEC AT CHICOUTIMI BY FAYÇAL LAMRAOUI IN-CLOUD ICING AND SUPERCOOLED CLOUD MICROPHYSICS: FROM REANALYSIS TO MESOSCALE MODELING NOVEMBER 2014 © Fayçal Lamraoui, 2014 The ice storm - January 1998 Oil on canvas painting – Artist: A. Poirier In the distance, the Montérégie, viewed from Mont-Royal (Montreal, Quebec, Canada) (Courtesy of the community Ste-Croix, Saint-Laurent) iii ABSTRACT In-cloud icing is continually associated with potential hazardous meteorological conditions at higher altitudes in the troposphere across the world and near surface over mountainous and cold climate regions. This PhD thesis aims to scrutinize the horizontal and vertical characteristics of near-surface in-cloud icing events, the associated cloud microphysics, develop and demonstrate an innovative method to determine the climatology of icing events at high resolution. In reference to ice accretion, the quantification of icing events is based on the cylinder model. With the use of North American Regional Reanalysis, a preliminary mapping of the icing severity index spanning a 32-year time period is introduced and in that way the freezing precipitation during the ice storm of January 1998 is quantified and compared to observations. Also, case studies over Mount- Bélair and Bagotville are investigated. The assessment of icing events obtained from NARR demonstrates agreements with observation over simple terrains and disparities over complex terrains, due to the coarse resolution of the reanalysis.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Department of State, 1996 Patterns of Global Terrorism
    Archive Site for State Department information prior to January 20, 2001. This site is not updated. RETURN to the current State Department web site. 1996 Patterns of Global Terrorism Report Table of Contents Introduction Terrorism in 1996 continued to cause grave concern and disruption in scores of countries. Combating this menace remains a very high priority for the United States and many other nations. But finding clear "patterns" in this form of political violence is becoming more difficult. The Department of State's annual Patterns of Global Terrorism focuses primarily on international terrorism involving citizens or territory of two or more states. It also describes but does not provide statistics on domestic terrorism abroad, which is an even more widespread phenomenon. The number of international terrorist incidents has fallen, from a peak of 665 in 1987, to 296 in 1996, a 25-year low. Moreover, about two-thirds of these attacks were minor acts of politically motivated violence against commercial targets, which caused no deaths and few casualties. Yet while the incidence of international terrorism has dropped sharply in the last decade, the overall threat of terrorism remains very serious. The death toll from acts of international terrorism rose from 163 in 1995 to 311 in 1996, as the trend continued toward more ruthless attacks on mass civilian targets and the use of more powerful bombs. The threat of terrorist use of materials of mass destruction is an issue of growing concern, although few such attempts or attacks have actually occurred. Finally, domestic terrorism, in countries such as Algeria, India, Sri Lanka, and Pakistan, appears to be growing and is more serious, in gross terms, than international terrorism.
    [Show full text]
  • FAA Advisory Circular AC 91-74B
    U.S. Department Advisory of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Circular Subject: Pilot Guide: Flight in Icing Conditions Date:10/8/15 AC No: 91-74B Initiated by: AFS-800 Change: This advisory circular (AC) contains updated and additional information for the pilots of airplanes under Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) parts 91, 121, 125, and 135. The purpose of this AC is to provide pilots with a convenient reference guide on the principal factors related to flight in icing conditions and the location of additional information in related publications. As a result of these updates and consolidating of information, AC 91-74A, Pilot Guide: Flight in Icing Conditions, dated December 31, 2007, and AC 91-51A, Effect of Icing on Aircraft Control and Airplane Deice and Anti-Ice Systems, dated July 19, 1996, are cancelled. This AC does not authorize deviations from established company procedures or regulatory requirements. John Barbagallo Deputy Director, Flight Standards Service 10/8/15 AC 91-74B CONTENTS Paragraph Page CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 1-1. Purpose ..............................................................................................................................1 1-2. Cancellation ......................................................................................................................1 1-3. Definitions.........................................................................................................................1 1-4. Discussion .........................................................................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • Thermometer 1 Thermometer
    Thermometer 1 Thermometer Developed during the 16th and 17th centuries, a thermometer (from the Greek θερμός (thermo) meaning "warm" and meter, "to measure") is a device that measures temperature or temperature gradient using a variety of different principles.[1] A thermometer has two important elements: the temperature sensor (e.g. the bulb on a mercury thermometer) in which some physical change occurs with temperature, plus some means of converting this physical change into a numerical value (e.g. the scale on a mercury thermometer). A clinical mercury-in-glass thermometer There are many types of thermometer and many uses for thermometers, as detailed below in sections of this article. Temperature While an individual thermometer is able to measure degrees of hotness, the readings on two thermometers cannot be compared unless they conform to an agreed scale. There is today an absolute thermodynamic temperature scale. Internationally agreed temperature scales are designed to approximate this closely, based on fixed points and interpolating thermometers. The most recent official temperature scale is the International Temperature Scale of 1990. It extends from 0.65 K (−272.5 °C; −458.5 °F) to approximately 1358 K (1085 °C; 1985 °F). Thermometer Thermometer 2 Development Various authors have credited the invention of the thermometer to Cornelius Drebbel, Robert Fludd, Galileo Galilei or Santorio Santorio. The thermometer was not a single invention, however, but a development. Philo of Byzantium and Hero of Alexandria knew of the principle that certain substances, notably air, expand and contract and described a demonstration in which a closed tube partially filled with air had its end in a container of water.[2] The expansion and contraction of the air caused the position of the water/air interface to move along the tube.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for Meteorological Icing Models, Statistical Methods and Topographical Effects
    291 GUIDELINES FOR METEOROLOGICAL ICING MODELS, STATISTICAL METHODS AND TOPOGRAPHICAL EFFECTS Working Group B2.16 Task Force 03 April 2006 GUIDELINES FOR METEOROLOGICAL ICING MODELS, STATISTICAL METHODS AND TOPOGRAPHICAL EFFECTS Task Force B2.16.03 Task Force Members: André Leblond – Canada (TF Leader) Svein M. Fikke – Norway (WG Convenor) Brian Wareing – United Kingdom (WG Secretary) Sergey Chereshnyuk – Russia Árni Jón Elíasson – Iceland Masoud Farzaneh – Canada Angel Gallego – Spain Asim Haldar – Canada Claude Hardy – Canada Henry Hawes – Australia Magdi Ishac – Canada Samy Krishnasamy – Canada Marc Le-Du – France Yukichi Sakamoto – Japan Konstantin Savadjiev – Canada Vladimir Shkaptsov – Russia Naohiko Sudo – Japan Sergey Turbin – Ukraine Other Working Group Members: Anand P. Goel – Canada Franc Jakl – Slovenia Leon Kempner – Canada Ruy Carlos Ramos de Menezes – Brasil Tihomir Popovic – Serbia Jan Rogier – Belgium Dario Ronzio – Italy Tapani Seppa – USA Noriyoshi Sugawara – Japan Copyright © 2006 “Ownership of a CIGRE publication, whether in paper form or on electronic support only infers right of use for personal purposes. Are prohibited, except if explicitly agreed by CIGRE, total or partial reproduction of the publication for use other than personal and transfer to a third party; hence circulation on any intranet or other company network is forbidden”. Disclaimer notice “CIGRE gives no warranty or assurance about the contents of this publication, nor does it accept any responsibility, as to the accuracy or exhaustiveness of the
    [Show full text]
  • At Least 17 Die in Hijack in Pakistan
    . to MANCHESTER HERALD, Friday. Sept. 5. mw OPINION |T M SALES SPORTS WEEKEND PI I S TAB SALES GARS ICAMfERS/ FOR SALE TRARiRS Voters prudent, Tog sole-everythlng must BUSINESS & SERVICE DIRECTORY Bosox Increase ool Moving out of the There’s Just one Giant tog sole - G «n«ral 1979 Olds Delta "88" country, Saturday and Building Supply Com- Royole. Very good condi­ sewer suit shows Sundoy September 4th oony, JOO Tolland Street R S n P A M TM B / MSCElLANEBUt tion. 82500. Coll 647-9330. lead on Toronto and 7th. 158 South Moln GMLBCABE l O ^ f ------------ 1972 Shasta Trailer. 14' 1 Adelma Simmons Eost Hortford, 289-3474 (ot Street PAPEimiB 8ERVICE8 self contained. Excellent ... editorial, page 6 the Dovls ond Bradford 1948 Mecury convertlb- le,automotlc transmlssl- condition. Asking 8950 568- ... pago<i » 'VS?'’ ® General Child core In my licensed Name your own price — 4653. ... magazine Inalda Building Supply Com­ home. Coll 449-3015. Delivering deem form Art's tight Trucklng- on.good running Fother and son. East, loom; 5vards875phMteM. egiiars,attfcs,gorages condition,new top,l pany) September 4 thro dependable service. September 14. Anderson Also sand, stone, and cleaned.■ Juhk houi..i m - owner. Coll evenings 646- CLEAMNB Eolntlng^ Eaperhanglno grovel. Call 4434S04. .Piirnffure (indoppitaness 6299. MOTORCYCLES/ windosw, doors, kitchen 8> Removal. Coll 8724237. cabinets, roofing, hord- Large Yard sole Saturday 8ERVICE8 moved. Odd lobs, very MOPEOS September 4th,9-4pm,742 honest dependable 1978 gos VW Rabbit, stand wore, hardwoods, oak, John Deerr painting con­ redwood, sidings and West Middle worker. 2S^eors expe­ ord transmission, sun 1981 Yamaha 550 Moxlm- Tpke,Monchester.
    [Show full text]
  • Oakland World Wings Chapter October 1, 2020 Newsletter from President Louise Diracles
    Oakland World Wings Chapter October 1, 2020 Newsletter from President Louise Diracles OCTOBER ZOOM Don’t miss the zoom meeting with a selection of old photos in celebration of our chapter’s 40th year together. During the first slide show no one can enter the zoom so Be in the Zoom when and where it happens: OAK Chapter Meeting Time: Monday, Oct 5, 2020 1:00 PM Pacific Time Contact Louise for the link to join the meeting. Thank you to Emilia de Geer for setting up yet another Zoom meeting!!! Let me know when you receive this: [email protected] MEMBER NEWS • Laurie Barton reported that she had an episode with A-Fib and was hospitalized but is now back to normal. • Linda Rineck lost her mom. WWI-OAKLAND EVENTS • Suzy Proescher had to cancel a ladies only OAK WW gathering on the top deck of the Commodore’s Cabernet Sauvignon ship in Alameda. She hopes to re schedule. If she re schedules, t will be open to the first ten members who RSVP to 702-280-4773 (Suzy’s cell.) After the first ten, interested members will be put on a waiting list and confirmed depending on Alameda County health regulations at the time of the event. Everyone can bring their own picnic lunch with beverage and utensils. There will be tables with tablecloths and chairs set up on the Sky Deck allowing for distancing. Bring your gloves and masks for a germ-free event that will stand out from all previous dining experiences aboard the Cabby. Hopefully the air will be smoke-free by then so we can enjoy the fresh breeze, views and our World Wings friendships.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Ice Detection Systems for Wind Turbines Final Report
    Weather Forecasts Renewable Energies Air and Climate Environmental IT Genossenschaft METEOTEST Fabrikstrasse 14, CH-3012 Bern Tel. +41 (0)31 307 26 26 Fax +41 (0)31 307 26 10 [email protected], www.meteotest.ch Bern, February 16, 2016 Evaluation of ice detection systems for wind turbines Final report VGB Research Project No. 392 report_v8_final.docx/rc METEOTEST 2 Disclaimer All information presented in this report is solely based on documents provided by the manufacturers of the ice detection systems as well as publicly available reports, papers and presentations. No data analysis has been carried out by Meteotest for this report. Especially the information on the accuracy of the systems has not been checked or validated by Meteotest or by TÜV NORD. Acknowledgements The research project "Evaluation of ice detection systems for wind turbines" was funded by VGB PowerTech e.V., which is kindly acknowledged. The project was initiated and supervised by the VGB Technical Committee "Wind Energy." The au- thors would like to thank the companies EnBW, Enercity (Stadtwerke Hannover), Energiewerkstatt, ESB Renewables, EVN Naturkraft, Fortech, GDF Suez Canada (now Engie) , GDF Suez Europe (now Engie), RheinEnergie, Vattenfall and WSB Service Deutschland for their active participation in the survey among wind-turbine operators conducted within the project. Finally the authors wish to thank all manu- facturers of ice detection systems for their active and transparent collaboration in the project. Version Date Document Project Number 1 16.02.2016 Final Report 15_025 Editing Name Date Created by René Cattin, Dr. Ulla Heikkilä 22.12.2015 Controlled by Dr. Ulla Heikkilä 23.12.2015 Approved by Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Terrorist Assets Report 1996
    TERRORIST ASSETS REPORT (January 1997) 1996 Annual Report to the Congress on Assets Belonging to Terrorist Countries or International Terrorist Organizations SUMMARY More than 3.1 billion dollars in assets of seven state sponsors of terrorism are located within U.S. jurisdiction. Of that amount more than $3.0 billion are blocked by the U.S. Department of the Treasury pursuant to economic sanctions imposed by the United States against five of the terrorist countries. In addition, approximately $734,000 in assets of international terrorist organizations which were identified and blocked within the united States in 1995, remain blocked in 1996. BACKGROUND Section 304 of Public Law 102-138, as amended by Public Law 103-236 (22 U.S.C. § 2656g), requires the Secretary of the . Treasury, in consultation with the Attorney General and appropriate investigative agencies, to provide annual reports to the Congress concerning the nature and extent of assets held in the United States by terrorist countries and organizations engaged in international terrorism. The Department of the Treasury submitted its first Terrorist Assets Report to the Congress in April 1993. The current report, covering calendar year 1996, is the fifth successive Terrorist Assets Report. The Terrorist Assets Report is submitted to the Committee on Foreign Relations and the Committee on Finance in the Senate and to the Committee on International Relations and the Committee on Ways and Means in the House. It was prepared by the Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control ("OFAC"), which has the responsibility for administering and enforcing economic sanctions programs mandated by the President pursuant to his declaration of a national emergency with respect to particular foreign countries and non-state parties.
    [Show full text]
  • Meteorological and Environmental Inputs to Aviation Systems
    https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=19880015721 2020-03-20T07:07:10+00:00Z NASA Conference Publication 2498 c Meteorological and Environmental Inputs to Aviation Systems Proceedings of a workshop held at the University of Tennessee Space Institute in Tullahoma, Tennessee March 12-14, 1985 NASA Conference Publication 2498 Meteorological and Environmental Inputs to Aviation Systems . Edited by Dennis W. Camp and Walter Frost University of Tennessee Space Institute Tullahoma, Tennessee Proceedings of a workshop jointly sponsored by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, .National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (Department of Commerce), Federal Aviation Administration (Department of Transportation), Department of Defense, and Office of the Federal Coordinator for Meteorology, and held at the University of Tennessee Space Institute in Tullahoma, Tennessee March 12-14, 1985 National Aeronautics and Space Administration Scientific and Technical Information Division PREFACE The first in a series of annual workshops addressing meteorological inputs to aviation systems was held on March 17-19, 1977, at the University of Tennessee Space Institute in Tullahoma, Tennessee. The workshops were initially sponsored by NASA, NOAA and the FAA, and were later joined in sponsorship by DOD and the Office of the Federal Coordinator. They have provided a forum for open discussion of weather and environmental concerns between the research, operations and user organizations within the aviation community. Following the past few workshops, several individuals have voiced concern over the benefit of what has become a continuing workshop with in many instances the same continuing recommendations. To assess the value of a continuing workshop one must look beyond a simple comparison of recommendations made year to year.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Ice-To-Liquid Ratios During Freezing Rain and the Development of an Ice Accumulation Model
    VOLUME 31 WEATHER AND FORECASTING AUGUST 2016 Analysis of Ice-to-Liquid Ratios during Freezing Rain and the Development of an Ice Accumulation Model KRISTOPHER J. SANDERS AND BRIAN L. BARJENBRUCH NOAA/National Weather Service, Topeka, Kansas (Manuscript received 12 September 2015, in final form 17 March 2016) ABSTRACT Substantial freezing rain or drizzle occurs in about 24% of winter weather events in the continental United States. Proper preparation for these freezing rain events requires accurate forecasts of ice accumulation on various surfaces. The Automated Surface Observing System (ASOS) has become the primary surface weather observation system in the United States, and more than 650 ASOS sites have implemented an icing sensor as of March 2015. ASOS observations that included ice accumulation were examined from January 2013 through February 2015. The data chosen for this study consist of 60-min periods of continuous freezing rain with 2 2 precipitation rates $ 0.5 mm h 1 (0.02 in. h 1) and greater than a trace of ice accumulation, yielding a dataset of 1255 h of observations. Ice:liquid ratios (ILRs) were calculated for each 60-min period and analyzed with 60-min mean values of temperature, wet-bulb temperature, wind speed, and precipitation rate. The median ILR for elevated horizontal (radial) ice accumulation was 0.72:1 (0.28:1), with a 25th percentile of 0.50:1 (0.20:1) and a 75th percentile of 1.0:1 (0.40:1). Strong relationships were identified between ILR and pre- cipitation rate, wind speed, and wet-bulb temperature. The results were used to develop a multivariable Freezing Rain Accumulation Model (FRAM) for use in predicting ice accumulation incorporating these commonly forecast variables as input.
    [Show full text]