Japanology (1852-1927) and Wendong Yao

Qing Late in

Ng Wai-ming Benjamin

Singapore University of National

investigate began

Chinese of

increasing number period, mid-Qing to

the From

an

considerable scholarship exerted

their periphery. of along Some China's conditions the

a

by of later scholars

highly rated been diplomacy and has politics Qing

and impact late

on

•,'• (1848-1905) Japanese in

ofHuang

Zunxian work generations. include the These

• • •l •b,.• Gong Zizhen (Ryfikyfi) studies, and • •r Liuqiu Jingfu in studies,

majority of these the However, border.

northern

China's (1792-1841) studies of in

3• •J• • (1852-1927)

is

Wendong forgotten.

Yao been pioneering have scholars one now

such

case.

Qing

China. figure late in political academic

prominent Wendong

Yao

not

or

a was

scholar of prolific

underrated

but diplomat medium-ranking and

only

area He

a

a

was

cultural Sino-Japanese

figure in

little-studied important but also studies.

He an was

early- late-Qing and published

figures prominent in

biographies

of

checked have I twenty

over

• 1• • Tonghe's Jindai

Weng in about Yao only short Republican and found

China entry

one

reprint: (Taibei China)

Modem (¢• •[• •

in (Biographies Prominent Persons • j•, of zhi

renwu

Shanghai, take him did hometown, his 1978), Even gongsi, 355. not

Xinwenfeng

chuban

p.

( Sequel) •]• • Prefecture, Shanghai • • (Records of J2 Shanghai xuzhi seriously.

xian

964-65) him

(pp. words few

than 1970) has

reprint: Chengwen,

reprint, Taibei 1919;

on a more no

by scholars. completely forgotten modem is Yao examinations.

civil

service

of

the under

category

@ yige flf] Wendong, •

Wai-ming Ng "Yao provided by

is

him

only article

academic

The

on

• 2• • •-• • • -f • •] • (Yao [] • • • Ribentong" Qingrno

beiyiwang de liao

College

of 7

History Asia New Qing), Journal of the Late Japan Hand Wendong, Forgotten at

a

They

include:

and articles.

books

of

number

briefly discussed in

is

(1985), Yao 41-55.

a

pp.

z•. •, •. •. '[• •(zd• (Sino-Japanese •)• [] y•: • ]• ,-• bunka k6sh6

Meiji Nis-Shi

Keishfi's Sanet6

•'• ]•1• 1•1• "Meiji Sabur6's • Sat6 1943); K6fukan,

(Tokyo:

Period) Meiji

the in

Contacts Cultural

-• • !• ,• • •

• J)J, •fJ [] kenkyfi"

Shinajin Nihon okeru sens6 ni izen Nis-Shin igo

ishin

no

Meiji and Restoration • ;z•:•l• the •J[• Japan J• of (Chinese between Studies •-• []

[•" :•

• Is_.

03

•?. • • • (1940) Kindai Nit-Cha • and kenkyfi Relashigaku 10.11 War), Sino-Japanese

the

51• • History Sino- •i• •. of Modem

• the (Studies

•-• d3 in •. kenkyfi I•

03

k6sh6 sh•

no

• •I 7J" "Jindai Wanhe's

k6bunkan, and 1983); Lii

Yoshikawa (Tokyo:

Interactions) Japanese

• •

• • • • • • • -•"

•'-• I• I•I zt• PA

• jiaowang" yanjiu wenhua yiqian dui-Ri de Jiawu

yu

1894-95), in of Cultural Sino-Japanese War Interactions before the

and

(Modem Japan

Studies of

5• •. • • Sino-Japanese • • • History of • the (Essays in

lunwenfi Zhong-Ri shi

guanxi

l• •X _• touches Xiaoqiu also chubanshe,

Wang 1984).

Heilong•iang renmin

(Harbin: Relations)

•6.

•-• 3•. • • • (History Modem j•. • of fiaoliu shi wenhua

Zhong-Ri his Jindai in Yao upon 8

interchange

diplomatic Chinese and

history.

significant made

He contributions

to

many

facets of

studies.

Japanologist, As

Japanology

prolific he (1852-1927) Wendong and writer

who Yao authored area nine a

was a

books Japan.

quantity,

In

of in history Chinese

terms until his time

on could

no

one

with

him.

also He "the first history

in Chinese

compare

translate

Japanese

was to

person

Qing China

Late in

books into

Chinese. outstanding As ''•

geographer,

he extensively

the

wrote

an

on

geography of Chinese (in borders Northwest, the Northeast, Southwest) and

and

neighboring nations (such

Japan, Annam,

Ryfikyfi and Kingdom). the

He

as

was

Wai-ming Ng concerned Benjamin about national defense provided and suggestions invaluable

Qing the late

to

military

Undoubtedly,

Wendong government

deserves Yao matters.

academic on

more

attention. This article

preliminary is Singapore University of

thought, of his life focusing

and

National his

a survey

on

contributions Sino-Japanese

examining relations. By performance

his to

diplomat

in

as a

early Meiji Japan,

Japanese

researcher in studies, strategist and

who advocated as a

as a

invading

Japan,

forgotten

introduce

this Japanologist attempt

readers to

locate

and investigate

we began to increasing

Chinese

number of

mid-Qing period,

the

From to

an

him

in field the

Chinese of Japanology.

considerable scholarship exerted along periphery. of their conditions China's Some the

a

by highly scholars of later rated politics diplomacy Qing and has been impact late and

on

• • ,• (1848-1905)

Japanese in generations.

Zunxian

Huang

of

These include the work

Diplomat Yao

His and

Cultural Activities

Japan

in as a • • I•I •)•J• •in (Ryfikyfi) Gong

studies, Zizhen and Jingfu Liuqiu studies,

Huang

Wendong

Yao

born in Shanghai into family

1852 scholarly

with

majority tradition

of these the However,

border. was (1792-1841) studies of China's northern in a

a

geography. in

Having

passed

provincial the

examination

in

•/(• he 1867, • the entered Longmen

(1852-1927) Wendong is

forgotten. pioneering have been scholars Yao one

now

shuyuan 1• •,

prestigious

academy

diplomats, train

his

academic

to to a such

pursue

case.

interest

diplomacy, geography,

in

defense. and

lukewarm taking

He

toward Qing the figure civil China. political

late in prominent

academic Wendong

Yao was

not

or was a

service examinations

and

of preparing time his

in diplomat.

himself

spent

be most prolific of His

underrated scholar

medium-ranking diplomat

but only and

to

He.

a

area

a a was

chance

in when

he by invited 1881

Sino-Japanese newly-appointed

the

Minister

Japan, Li figure came cultural in important little-studied but also was studies. to

He

was an

• •

Shuchang •,

join

diplomatic

the mission Japan to

attachr. arrived Yao in to

as an

following Japan

the

year.

early-

published late-Qing figures

and

prominent in biographies of

have checked

I

twenty

over

did

flying have

Yao

diplomatic

his

in did

along not

He

start

well

a

get

not • I•

• career.

Tonghe's

Weng Jindai only Republican

about in short Yao China and found

entry

one

Shuchang

with

Li

and

that

suggestions his

largely

ignored. Li

upset

He

to

was

reprint:

(Taibei (¢7, • • China) sent

• }k Modem

were

(Biographies in Prominent

of Persons zhi

renwu

letters •]: several

Zongli •,

the

•] •A•

(Office Yamen Foreign

Affairs),

of to

complaining

Shanghai, him did take hometown,

Xinwenfeng

gongsi, his

1978), chuban 355. Even

not

p.

about

Li's style) dictatorial

resigned

1884, Li

In his because

of

the g•, (Shanghai • • • death Sequel) his Prefecture, of Shanghai

post (Records

)2 of seriously. Shanghai xuzhi

xian

mother. The

Minister •(•, •

7• Japan,

Chengzu

Xu retained

964-65) (pp. him words Chengwen, than to the few Yao reprint, reprint: Chinese

1970) has 1919;

Taibei new

at

on

more a no

Legation.

Shuchang 1887,

Li In again forgotten appointed by completely scholars.

modem

Minister is of civil service examinations.

Yao Japan, under the

and

category Yao

to once was

as

{•

Japan left I•fJ yige :• Europe for Wendong, Wai-ming few provided by Ng "Yao months only later. academic article

him is The

a

on

• •1 • •J¢

•3• • fVao •= Qingrno Ribentong" did beiyiwang spend How liao de

Yao these six in important Japan? His job

assignment

years most

College of History

Qing),

7

Journal New Asia Wendong, Forgotten Japan

of the Hand

Late

Japan's geography.

at This

the to

for Shuchang

which Li

survey a

was took

very

purpose

was

They

include:

briefly books and articles.

of

discussed

in number (1985),

is

Yao

41-55.

him Shortly Japan.

arriving

after

there,

expressed pp. to a Yao worries about whether

he

could

•. ?• • • •

• f•J• y• • • ,-• (Sino-Japanese [] Meiji k6sh6 Sanet6 Keishfi's Nis-Shi bunka

accomplish

mission:

this

• •[g "Meiji Saburr's Krfukan, Sat6 • 1943); Meiji (Tokyo: Period) Contacts the in Cultural

• • • • • • !• J)J, J)),

kenkyfi"

I• []

Shinajin sens6 igo Nihon Nis-Shin izen okem ni ishin

no

Sino-Japanese

Interactions) Cultural (Beijing: Zhonghua

shuju,

1992),

184-91. 2•:;•-• •J[•)x, Meiji D. R. 1•-• Howland Japan the Restoration and •" (Chinese

[] Studies of between :•3 • [Y-

pp.

tD

also briefly discusses

Yao in of his Border Chinese Civilization (Durham •,• •k. • •

and

London: pt• kenkyfi

(1940) Relashigaku Kindai Duke Nit-Chfi War), and Sino-Japanese 10.11 the

University

Press, 1996).

secondary Since

references extremely limited,

this •-• dy 5[?. • • History • • research relies (Studies • kenkyfi the of Modem Sino- in • krsh6 shi 0") are

no

mainly

primary

7J"

• •gl

on krbunkan, sources. Wanhe's "Jindai

1983);

(Tokyo: and

Interactions)

Yoshikawa Lii

Japanese

• -• : •, See

Tam

Zhongguo Yue-him d?

•r [] ;l• zonghe Riben •, • shu

•]-• • X• • • 3• • • • [] 4• yi zp • mulu •

• 1•I • I)A • jiaowang"

yanjiu yiqian wenhua

de dui-Ri

Jiawu

yu

•1•

(Overall

Listing

Chinese

of Japanese Translations Books) of (Hong Kong:

Chinese University

1894-95), Sino-Japanese

of in of before the War Japan Cultural Interactions (Modem

Studies of and

Hong Kong

Press,

1980), 56. 5• i• • r:O •

• • •t History Sino-Japanese

lunwenfi p. the (Essays of

Zhong-Ri

in

shi

guanxi

3

Chow

Hwa, Jen China Japan:

History and The of Diplomatic IP• •X Chinese Japan, Missions

:E.

Xiaoqiu

chubanshe, Wang also touches 1984). Heilongjiang (Harbin:

Relations)

renmin in

(Singapore:

1877-1911 Chopmen

Enterprises,

1975), 5t• 107, •-• • • • •f• • 153. • j•.

(History jiaoliu of Modem Zhong-Ri shi wenhua Jindai pp. Vao in his upon 8

the

geography and

Japan's report study

to assignment to received Wendong,

I, to

an

perfect.

from is far research geographical studies, Although like I my

stressful

become it has Hence, foreign affairs.

with particular, familiar very I In not

am

position. taking 4 this

since for me

he assignment, official Regarding this

Qing disappoint

the

government. did

Yao not

Draft) • •

7• (Treatise Japan,

[]

zhi Riben important

works:

three finished a

on

gao

Ryfikyfi

Geography of the •:•

:• • (Treatise the • •

juan),

zhi Liuqiu dili (1884, 10

on

Geography 7_•:••[• and (Japan's [] bingyao dili 2juan),

Riben Islands) (1884, and

of

basically translation

is zhi volumes). Riben The Defense) (1884,

2juan, 8 a Its

gao

physical human and

focusing their domains, writings different of historical official on

writings the

non-official

and official of collection is dili zhi geography. Liuqiu The on

a

bingyao dill Riben The

Chinese.

into

translated

Ryfikyfi Islands geography

of the

•J• •J', • • (A

shrshi

Heiy6 chiri the

Based Japan.

attack discusses the

to on ways

military and by Japanese published the Japan), Geography Military in of

Brief Account

defense. coastal Japan's concerning

particularly detailed this is Japanese other

sources,

of

deal

did Chengzu, great Yao Shuchang and Xu Li attach6 the

As

a to

intellectuals

Japanese example, invited Li to tasks. secretarial For and administrative

many

he and 1882, Festival in

Ninth Double

the gathering

celebrate

in Ueno attend

to poetry

a

Jl, •g

denggao shi Chongjiu

entitled book, publish into

the edit and asked Yao

to

poems a

project

ambitious had (1882).

Festival) also Li • •, Nine

5 • Double (Poems for the

an

-•

congshu

Guyi the

China in preserved in lost Japan but

in reprint

Chinese

texts

to

some

and classicist famous asked the Japan). • Li • Books in • (Series

Chinese of Lost

series, and of the Shoujing/• chief editor ,• • (1839-1915), the be calligrapher, Yang to

help and friends for

Japanese solicited his editor. Yao assistant served the Yao

as

by Huang Kan discovered the instance, he impressive commentary

results. For achieved

Classic) 7•,

the •-•

(Thousand in Character __• Qianzi ()• Liang the Dynasty

of the

wen

on

collate, and Chengzu

by appointed then Library Xu Ashikaga in He to 1887. copy,

was

precious publish this

text.

his conduct found duties, time also fulfilling official Yao his Besides to own

Shuchang

Li

the like mainly did he because this did Japan. research He

not way

on

piecemeal, being criticizing them

Japan, about gather information staff his instructed

to as

improve the capacity, little could do he official confusing. his inadequate, and In to

his He Japan variety information about gathered

of network, and he intelligence own. on a

Sojoum • • during My •g in • Writings (Miscellaneous Dongcha zazhu Wendong,

4 Yao

University

Beijing has quantity published and small

in

book Japan) This (1882).

a

very

a

was

Xiaoqiu Beijing

of

provided by Wang

Dongcha this article zazhu in quotations from All are copy.

gratitude.

his wishes University, author whom the to

express

to

gatherings

of kinds Japan, had held these

Minister he Shuchang's at During

5 Li

to

tenure as

Zhong-Ri • Mingzhi I• [] shidai ), Guting Chen Keishfi (trans. Sanet6

nine times. See least

•. Meiji • • r• • ff•J Links the in Cultural • ff• 1• (Sino-Japanese F• f•J• de lianxi wenhua

meetings be found in of these 1971), Records congshu, 44-51. Zhongguo (Taibei: Period)

can

pp.

from and • • 3( Prose (Collections Chinese-Language Poems •J• • • of Meiji Kanshibun sha

shobr, 1983), (Tokyo: Meiji 270-72. Period) Chikuma the pp:

compile

planned in book series

history who

Chinese in

perhaps first

the

to

a person

was

• •-• •j• ershierzhong

"Dongcha mulu"

•. which he referred studies, Japanese

to

as

series

studies Volumes). His Japanese • [• Twenty-Two (Series Studies in Japanese

on

volumes), volumes), history (5

(10 categories: literature into five classified be

can

volume). military (1 affairs He volumes) and volumes), (3 (3 economics geography

was

above- the eight addition publish Of them. In and finish nine volumes able to

to

to

Chongjiu zhi, and bingyao, Liuqiu dili dili Riben works--Riben zhi four mentioned

gao,

capacity. five books private

These

complied in denggao books another five shi--he

are:

a

• Zhongdong 7J• •--['• (1883), nianbiao (Economic Japan)

of [] kuaiji

Data Riben lu

• • • • g•_ •[• • •j• shi

unclear), Mojiang (date Japan)

(Annals

of China and xiuxi

•. • •j• • [-flj tongwenji River) (1883), Haiwai Composed (Poems

the Sumida

at

l• ]• •

• (Words of Guisheng Foreign Literature) (1888), (Collection and of

zengyan

contains kuaiji book which is data (1889). lu Departure) Riben My for Encouragement

a

bonds. expenditures, and budget, Japan's figures annual about government

revenues,

history. Japanese and comparisons Chinese between Zhongdong nianbiao is table of

a

gathering during composed in Haiwai 1883.

is collection of

Mojiang xiuxishi

poems a a

compiled by

the and pieces

of Chinese

collection of is tongwenji 24

prose verse

a

together by Japanese

Yao's Guisheng of is collection

Japanese. 41 put poems zengyan a

mother in visit his he left for China 1886. friends when to

compiling

series, of the writing the Although started had it that

Yao rest

or seems

noteworthy

works,

unfinished Among thirteen finish it. these able he most to

not was was

Chinese-language Japan in the literature systematically introduce wanted that he to to

Tokugawa scholars

idea. advocated this who the first

Chinese. Yao not

one was

Qing evaluation. late for One Chinese-language China frequently their

to

sent

poems

published • •, by and them Japanese the

Chinese selected scholar, Yu Yue

poems

some

•g, •t •, Japan) (1883). • [Chinese-language] (Selected of Poems Dongying shixuan

as

writings by Japanese. compile Chinese-language the inspired

This have Yao

to prose

may

3• • • • •J• (Invitation qi" for Essay "Donghai zhengwen explained his motive his in He

Japan): in Contributions

writings dynasty, Dynasties Chinese Qing have the from the Three In retrospect, to many

read Japan and write Chinese. in of this nation. Scholars introduced been to

can

by neighbors, exchange of literature famous Although the Japan nation

and

my are

Sino-Japanese deplorable thing in This is such of both countries is authors

rare. a

literary 6 circle. relations and the in

writings composed trilogy

planned compile in introduce Chinese

Yao

to to

prose

a

•. 7• •,,

(Origins [] Japanese of Riben

and medieval Japan: ancient

yuan

prose wen as

7• •. • (Records Prose), [] Japanese of Tokugawa and Prose), Riben

lu

prose wen as

•,

•.

• • (Collection Prose). Japanese of Meiji chuan Haiwai

prose wen as

quantity publish of works he had Unfortunately, edit and the did time have he to not

important unfinished contribution. Other gathered. Otherwise, it been would have

an

families, prominent history history, Japanese the of Japanese concerned modern the items

j•-•.• (q• •q• •---• Qing • • Liuqiu • the in Liuqiufilu of the Islands Qingdai (Records 6 In xufi

congkan, 1972), Continued) (Taibei: wenxian 190. Period, p. 11

history officialdom, Japanese of the history Tokyo, of Japanese the volcanoes hot and

springs, transportation mining

land and history Japan, Japan, in in of Japanese the

arts sea

literature, sequel and subject, volume the

and

poetry.

a on

same

addition Japanese series, this published In studies also book which Yao to

a

prefaces,

letters, includes written, Dongcha short had and

he

entitled zazhu

some essays

• •: •

(Miscellaneous Writings during Sojourn Japan) (1884). in book is This

a an

important understanding reference for Meiji early Japan. activities Yao's in

During sojourn

his in Japan, active social had and cultural life Yao and spent

an

reading in much time both

gatherings.

and opportunity wasted social also He

at

to

no

himself experiences Tokyo. instance,

in in visited he the For 1883

to expose

new

• • • Seikeikan Tsukimi, Girls principal, teachers, School in where the students and

all females.

This girls

since Yao,

China have did schools

to not were eye-opener an was

impressed this time. by discipline by He talent and the of the students yet and the at

was

school uniform and developments followed foreign the of domestic He and

ceremony.

closely. affairs

outspoken opinions. and example, He dared his he For to

was express

Zongli the complaining Yamen, Legation the that Chinese neither received to wrote

adequate

funding clear Qing

directives from

the official letter

In

government.

to

nor a an

3• • •

Tongwen of

(Beijing the Bureau), charged Translation that he of the

guan most

staff Legation Chinese the only

about their concerned interests

and

at were own

were

indifferent affairs of 7 to

state.

six-year During his Japan, in made considerable in Yao his stay

progress

scholarship, thanks both colleagues his Chinese friends. Japanese his and The Chinese to

]•, influenced •;• who Shuchang, • Yao Shoujing, Li Yang Chen Jialin and most

were

Huang Among

friends, Zunxian.

Japanese his particularly indebted Yao Hoshino

to

was

•f_• •__•(1833-1901), •_• (1839-1917), Hisashi Shigeaki • Gam6 Senjin

and

Oka

-• •',]J (1832-1914).

Shuchang

Li diplomat, historian, geographer. and

Before became he

was a

Minister Japan, working he several Legation for the in Chinese different spent to

years

[]•--•-•-•(Conditions nations Europe. in wroteXiyangzazhi He West) in in the 1880

to

politics, introduce society

Western

and his Like Yao, he countrymen. to economy,

was

also

concerned national about defense and appoint asked the him government to to

geographical conduct

Russia. in

Japan in He s

the second 1881 to

survey a

came

as

Chinese Minister Japan. However, he seldom though Japan about his to

wrote

understanding

Japan of

with

first the

Chinese Ruzhang

Minister

Japan,

He

to par

was

on a

•j" • •1

1837),

(b.

who books three major Japan. His contribution

the

wrote

on

was

completion Guyi

of Although congshu. the Li did and establish Yao

not

very

a

working relationship, harmonious they shared similar geography, interests defense, in and

compilation of the books. expertise Li's international in relations enlarged also Yao's

knowledge. of scope

Shoujing Yang prominent specialized scholar

who geography in

and

was a

calligraphy. longer

Yang

(more time years) than than spent Chinese other ten

a any

official in Japan.

Japan in Ruzhang He attach6 1877

He retained and to to came as an was

S• China Japan, and 149, 153.

pp.

Shuchang, Li Xiyang (Changsha

reprint: zazhi ehubanshe, 1981), renmin 5-19. pp. 12

by Shuchang Li

counselor. Yang

made invaluable

contributions as Sino-Japanese

to

interchange.

cultural

Being

bibliophile,

he visited

used bookstores

private a

and

collections

of

Japanese his

friends

and discovered

Tang

Song and

editions of

some

Chinese

books

which had

been lost in China. With the assistance

of and Yao

other

colleagues

from the

Chinese Legation, he

edited

and collated

these books

and

rare

reprinted

them

in China Guyi the

congshu.

also

He important

several

as works

wrote

on

Chinese

historical

geography

during period. this

Yang's colleague As

collaborator,

and

Yao have benefited

greatly must from Yang's knowledge bibliography. in geography

and

Chen

Jialin

and

Yao like-minded

colleagues.

They

both

wanted were write

to

a

treatise Japan.

Chen,

due problems his

language,

time

of to and on only

managed

write

to

down

his experiences

in

Japan

in

entries, publishing

37 them Dongcha •, •)•

lu wenjian

as

I• • •

(Things Heard

and

in Seen Japan) (1887).

writings These

history,

cover

geography,

society, religion, education, economy, military, and the

stressing

the

importance

of

modernization.

shared He similar interests

and views

with

many

Yao.

For

example, they both underestimated military the strength Meiji of Japan.

relationship

Yao's

with the prominent

Japanologist in most time, his

Huang

Zunxian, interesting. is

Huang

the counselor in the first Chinese Legation

was under

He

Ruzhang. departure

His

and Yao's arrival

close

in time. Sharing similar

research

were

interests in

Japan,

it

would

have been shame

if these Japanologists

had

missed two the a

chance

another. Nevertheless,

to meet there ties

between one

their respective

were

scholarship.

When Huang published

73• his •fi • Riben •, zashi [] shi

(Poems

on

Miscellaneous

Topics

Japan)

in

1879,

Yao still in

China might and

have on

read it.

was

Yao

Riben zhi

(1884) and Huang wrote

73•

Riben []

[] •

zhi gao (Treatises wrote

guo

on

Japan) (1894).

Indeed,

they

have influenced

each They other.

also may 9 had

many

Japanese

friends in including

prominent

such figures

common, Senjin, Oka

Gam6

as

Shigeaki,

Shigeno

Yasutsugu • • • •

(1827-1910),

•J• • • Ono I_l_l,

Kozan

Mori

•: •: •]•,

Shunt6 • •-•, Moil Kainan Miyajima •" • and •- Seiichir6 •1•

(1838-

1911).

These

1° represented the best Japanologists in Qing late

men China.

Huang

produced

brilliant

works Japan two

which exceeded

quality, Yao's in work whereas on

finished Yao nine

books Japan

and outnumbered Huang's

quantity. in hardly on We can

Huang 9

his started book (1879)

earlier than Yao, but fmished Yao his book

(1884).

earlier

They

might

have

treated

each other competitors

and followed the the of closely. other

as

progress

Sanet6

Keishfi

believes that in

the of

of

the terms

treatise and the

annals, Huang

name

was

influenced by

Yao. Yao

completed Zhongdong his nianbiao in Huang 1884. also

added the

Zhongdong

nianbiao

in his

Riben zhi in

Huang 1887.

first referred his guo

book

at

Riben to

as

zhi and

Yao his

book

Riben

zhi. Later, to

changed Yao the

his of as book guo

Riben

zhi

to

name

Huang and

his renamed book Riben zhi. Mmgzhi gao, See Zhong-RJ shJdai lianxi, wenhua guo de

87-88.

pp.

•0 Zheng •1•

See • Ziyu •

Sanet6 Keishfi, and

eds., Huang

Zunxian

Riben bitan

yu

youren

• ,•

• •

• 7•

}k • •e• [] yigao •h• • (Remaining Drafts

of Brush

Conversations

between

Huang Zunxian

Japanese and His Acquaintances)

(Tokyo:

daigaku Waseda shuppanbu,

1968).

See Wai-ming also

Ng,

"The Formation

Huang of Tsun-hsien's Thought Political

Japan in

(1877-

1882),"

Smo-Japanese Studies

(October 1995), 8.1 9-14. pp. 13

period find this

who in match them.

Huang known,

better

Because anyone

can was

• ,• •: • Sanet6 Keishfi dubbed has Huang "the Second Zunxian."11 Yao

might Other Chinese who during influenced have

include Japan his in

Yao

Xu

stay

• •,

Chengzu, • •r. • Chaozeng Xi Huang and Chengzu

Yu served third the Xu

as

Chinese Japan Minister in from Being English familiar with 1884 and 1888. Western to

studies, the Meiji improved Xu of Sino-Japanese

Japanese, and he respect

many won

during relations his

pursuing and trusted

free hand him in 12 Xu his Yao tenure.

gave a

research Japan. Xi

the Chinese Yu job consul in remarkable

Yokohama who did on was

a

protecting interests the of Chinese residents. Like Yao, interested also in 13 Yu

was

translating

Japanese Although books Chinese. into this, did find the he time do he

not to

supported encouraged and

project Japanese preface studies Yao's and for the

wrote

even

Liuqiu Yao's Chaozeng

zhi. colleague dili

Huang Legation. the Chinese Yao's

at

was

Under Shuchang, orders from Li places Huang

visited Japan and in

the 37

wrote

•¢,

• • Dongying • (Essays unknown).

Japan) (date Travel in could Yao youcao

on

acquired have handful of information first-hand from Huang.

a

kept Yao close Japanese with intellectuals. officials Chinese and TM contact

a

Japanese scholars regularly they exchanged and and ideas written in met

poems

• conversation. •± • literary attended Yao functions of the (Society Reitakusha

group,

a

Benefit), of Mutual

by founded Shigeno chaired and Yasutsugu. Reitakusha The

met at

least month, bringing usually each together time

scholars,

mainly than 40

once a

more

Japanese and Legation. officials Chinese the from Huang Chinese Zunxian poets

some

time active left,

member of this

place he After took and Yao his at was

one group. an

enjoyed

reputation

fine in praised

Japanese

and

The

them

master

a

prose

as a verse. as

• • cizong" "Liang • •(• • • (Verse master) "Dawenzong" (Great and master).

prose

interesting episode One Senjin occurred after student, Oka

asked his beloved Katayama

]• • lJ_l (1859-1933),

Sen study

under Katayama treated Yao. his teacher and Yao to as

showed him He great respect. wrote:

People

[Yao] that knowledgeable

talented writings and and and

say you

are your

scholarship

beyond

They particularly that

familiar with the

compare. say are you are

foreign changes in discussing affairs fond and of the situation of the world Your

are

writings

superb. delicate and If opportunity scholars of

have the country

are so my

some

they "reaching know reaching the Dragon [i.e., it call Gate" ultimate] the I, to

you,

[Katayama] Sen, study day will hard. One famous, when become will I abroad. travel I

Shanghai

Qing first visit will I dynasty

the in tribute

This is great to to

pay my

you.

a

indebtedness the Although today.

I, Sen,

I good, Alas!

to way not repay you owe am

the first make

there realize that talents

15 abroad.

to you are one many me are

Zhong-Ri Mingzhi 11 shidai lianxi, 69, wenhua de 86. pp.

Japan, 1• See China and 160-71. pp.

Meiji Kamachi, Japan: •3 Noriko Chinese "The in Their Japan Interaction with Sino- Before the

Japanese Iriye, War," ed., Akira The Chinese in Japanese: Essays and the Political and in

Cultural University (Princeton: Interactions Princeton 1981), Press, 67-72.

pp.

According 14 acquaintance

made the Yao Japanese of least intellectuals. 36 count, to at

my

15 Mingzhi Quoted Included in Zhong-Ri lianxi, in Haiwai shidai wenhua de tongwenji. 69. p.

Katayama

later became of advocate socialism. an 14

relationships Yao's

with

Japanese

scholars

reciprocal.

Yao

were

commented

their

works

on taught and

them

Chinese,

whereas

some Japanese

scholars

provided

him

with

information,

lent

him books,

and

translated Japanese

into

Chinese

for

sources

him.

These

services

extremely important

were for

Yao,

because

he did

understand

not Japanese

and

there

such

talents

in were the

Chinese no

Legation.

invited Yao 16

Japanese

scholars

many

help

him

with to

the

translation.

There

least twelve at

Japanese

were scholars

helping

him.

particular, In

Nakane

q•

• Shuku

•j(,

Oka

Senjin,

Tsukamoto

• Meigi Y_Is:

•,

HfJ

and

K;,tazawa

• Masanari •--F

did

the

majority

of the

work.

the In

nine books

complied

by

Yao,

there

is

single

not

which

did a

one receive

assistance not

from the

Japanese.

Assistance

in

various

forms: came

editing,

translation,

data collection,

writing,

proofreading,

writing

prefaces,

publication. and

Yao impressed

by

the performance was

of these

"research

assistants."

He "They

familiar wrote:

with

geography are

history

and

and

give

guidance

without

can

preparation. They

often

rectify

mistakes."17

Yao

only my

associated

himself

with

the Japanese

who

knew

Chinese

and

communicated

with them

in

written Chinese.

Since he

relied

much

them

for Japanese,

so

Yao on

made

serious

no attempt

study the Japanese to language himself.

Yao

Scholar

and the Characteristics as a

of

Japanology

his

Among

Yao's

writings

Japan,

Riben

zhi on Riben bingyao difi

gao,

Dongcha and

zazhu

the

important.

are

most

Yao

wanted

be the

first

to

Chinese

conduct

to

comprehensive

a

Japan,

survey

and

Riben

zhi

on

his

ambitious gao

most was

work.

This

18

consists text

of

juan,

ten each

particular region

of on Japan:

a Trkaidr,

Trsandr,

Hrkurikudr,

Sanindr,

Sanyrdr, Nankaidr,

Saikaidr,

Hokkaidr,

Kinai,

and

the

capitals. two

Each

juan discusses

24

of the region:

aspects territory,

geography, history, local

16

Like

Huang

Zunxian

and

other

Chinese

officials

Japan, in

Yao had

knowledge

of the

Japanese no

language

and did

study

it Japan. in

not

He

relied heavily

the reading

of the

Kanfi •

on

-•

(Chinese

characters

Japanese)

in

and the

translations by

his Japanese on

friends.

During

the

of Ruzhang, tenure

He

the

Chinese

Legation

had

the

Dong of

fanyi

• post •J

(Japanese

translator).

However,

this

became

post

when Shuchang

Li vacant

became

Minister

Japan.

It to

that

the

Chinese

Legation seems

failed

find

to

appropriate

candidate

an fill this

position.

to

Hence,

compared

with

the

times

Huang of

Zunxian

Japan,

in importance

the

Japanese of

scholars

in providing

translations increased

during

of

Yao Wendong's

See

Qing tenure.

Guangxu

chao

Zhong-Ri

jiaoshe

shiliao •7• :y• • !•j r• xuanji

• • • •?.

i• •

(Collection

of

Historical

Materials

Sino-Japanese

Relations

on from Guangxu

the Reign

Qing

of the

Dynasty)

(Beijing:

Beiping

bowuyuan,

1932),

gugong

5,

juan 20, entry

22.

D.

Howland R.

p. that

suggests Yao

leamed

speak Japanese.

to

See Borders

of

Chinese

Civilization,

However,

233.

p. I

find

cannot

textual

for any this support view.

17 Dongcha zazhu.

See footnote

4.

Strictly 18

speaking,

Weng

Guangping

• •--•

(1760-1843)

had already

written

treatise Japan

in

Wuqifing his a

=••I•(A on bu

Supplement

Azuma kagami)

to (1814).

However,

it

published

was

and

never few

people knew

very of

its

existence.

When Yao

writing

his

book

in was

Japan,

Huang

Zunxian

had

finished

his

not Riben

zhi. Hence,

Yao

guo

in position

was become to a

the

first

Chinese

finish

publish

and to

treatise

Japan. a on 15

military, schools, famous the prefectures, land, taxation, population, administration,

ships, lighthouses, reefs, islands, harbors, lakes, flatlands, rivers, mountains, places,

capes,

problem his

serious in the language barrier products. The most and factories buoys, was

scholarship. Yao wrote:

by publications the the Meiji by govemment, domains the of abolishment the Since

Meiji

Japanese

the However, began private in the and to

sector government grow

Wendong, have I, read. difficult writings find which I their

into kana to insert

guozhi.

19 compile Riben

translators Japanese books and hired gathered to many

had used

zhi He Riben it the named work and draft of this the finished more Yao gao.

friends

his

Japanese consulted extensively references and every books than on 100

as

Japan work

other

than better book this that Hisashi believed Hoshino on detail. any

was

he "afterword" the

Chinese. wrote In recommended it the strongly

and by Chinese to

a

noted: book, Hoshino for the

for

Japan name] in • has been • [Wendong's literary Zhiliang years many as a

together

them and geography of books put country the translated diplomat. He

my

geography

In economic in excellent

synthesis is such This

text into

great

an a

the attention paying

flowery,

to writings Chinese of the the the more past,

were

and decorative empty words

their Therefore, style the writing than

content. were

Zhiliang

Now, misleading

particularly

foreign affairs

narratives Their

were

on

that realize

they will

it, read When his book. this countrymen new written a has

2° the in East. bom has been nation

give

acknowledgment

bibliography and

provided

useful to

also

book,

Yao the an In

a

preface and •

• (1838-94)

• the Fucheng wrote friends. Japanese his

credit

to

practice, he

standard Following

sent afterword. penned the

Hisashi a Hoshino

a

publish in

it

would

hoping the that government Zongli

Yamen, the an

handwritten

to

copy

and book the interested in

Qing

Unfortunately, the not government

edition. official

was

only

unpublished

and

remained

publisher. The private

21 find a text failed also Yao

to

a

published, have would Yao been had work this If copies circulated. handwritten few

history.

Chinese place modem prominent in

secured

more a

footnote Dongcha 4. See zazhu.

19

compared of

with that be quality

work

the of

The cannot

This overstatement. Ibid.

:0

an

was

book, whereas Yao writing the

in

nine

than Huang zhi. Huang's spent Riben years more guo

merely in zhi Riben finished his

two years.

gao

Riben

finished his Zunxian

Huang instance, period.

For this

guo in

Publication

:1

not

easy

was

•fl _•_

•0• (1823-1901),

Hongzhang

Li Zongli Yamen, copies the handwritten

and 1887 to zhi in

sent

publishing the book. interested in

• •[• •d]. the

govemment

not However, Zhidong Zhang

and was

Xiaoqiu,

Wang

published See in 1895. finally

Huang's

book

Fucheng,

ofXue help

the With

was

Analysis • of the •

•s: Preliminary

• j• (A

[] •

I•t

chutan"

zhi Riben Zunxian "Huang

guo

5•. • • d(•

•C. "ill

lunwenfl

jiaoliu shi Zhong-Ri wenhua

Zunxian), in Huang of zhi

Riben

guo

chubanshe, (Beijing: Renmin Relations) Cultural Sino-Japanese •i• •1• History • of the in (Essays

t992), 234. p. 16

The important

book

bingyao next his Riben most dili

which

"the first was

was

book Japanese

geography by

modem Chinese.

''•2 Heiy6 Based on shOshi, chiri

a

on

published

by Army the Ministry

in Japan,

and

number of other Japanese

Yao

a

sources,

eomiling

entire

spent

this

pointed work.

he

As "Japan is year an island nation.

All out:

an

important

the places

located

the seashore

the of islands. Hence, complied

are I

Riben on

bingyao

dill explain

the geography

its

of to coastal

I

than

spent in

areas. more year

a

writing

this book.

This ''•3 work ordinary

geography book,

indeed but "military

was no

a

manual"

be used attack Japan

regain to Ryfikyfi to

the Islands.

to

It also

as

so

was

a

publication the

Shinkoku of heiy6 • :ff• to [] •;• response •,

chirishi • •J

(Military

Geography

Qing China) of by Japanese the

government.

fact, In after the

Ryfikyfi Incident, the

calls attacking

for Japan becoming

were

louder.

example, For General Wang •, • Zhiehun •l• q:: • Qiyuan and •; Chen already

advocated

this

few

before Nevertheless, Yao. bingyao measure

Yao's Riben dill a years

represented

the of this thought. of apex current

Dongcha His zazhu is also mentioning.

worth consists of It his letters, personal

prefaces afterwords, and

and short

24

providing best the firsthand

for essays,

sources

understanding

his perceptions Japan. of Unlike

his

and in collections, other

prose verse

these

had significance

greater essays Yao: to a

have

I

considerable period spent time of Japan. in My Japanese always friends a ask

show

them

to

This

trip took I me home my essays.

and own

summer,

a

many

Japanese reminded

the of thing.

Thus, brother

Wennan me same

my

younger

selected

of

publication for in print.

movable some Neither my do essays dare I

to

anything confidential,

do anything include I expose that is serious. 24 nor not

Since

of writings

Yao's compilations most

translations

Japanese

of

and he

were

or

sources

left

few of words his Dongcha

the effectively is zazhu important the

own,

reference

most

understanding for his life thought. and

Compared

with other Chinese Japanologists

Qing in the period,

Yao's

research

on

Japan following had the four characteristics:

First,

the quantity writings his of

unprecedented. of Most Qing the

was

researchers

only left

works

Japan, but finished

two Yao nine books. According one or

on

during

the to beginning

count, from 22

the my Meiji of

the

in

years the 1868

Yao's

to

era

departure

in 1889,

there

works Japan 31

by written

thirteen

Chinese

were authors. on

Wendong Yao topped

the list books; with nine ;• Wang qz (1828-97) Tao

Wang and

Zhichun

distant

with seconds four

books

each; Huang Zunxian, were

Ruzhang, He

and

Fu

• Yunlong •

three books

•j• each; •

Xiaoyuan Li []

wrote

books;

and

Jin

two

Anqing :• ,•,

•'•,

• Gong •, Chai Zhuang • •, Gongwei •

Wang Yongni • •, _z•

Jialin, Chen

Huang Chaozeng, and book each.

one

Second,

had

Yao

ambitious plan. research Exceedingly

few Chinese an

authors

had

of plan research

studying for

sort Japan. Huang

any Zunxian and Jialin Chen

each had

plan

they but

only

wanted write treatise

Japan. a to

Yao's plan research a much on was

Mingzhi 22

Zhong-Ri shidai wenhua lianxi, de

82.

p.

23 Dongcha zazhu. See footnote 4.

24 Ibid. 17

comprehensive. books introduce intended write larger 22 scale and in He to to

more

literature, politics, history, geography, economics and from Japan of different to aspects

affairs, remarked that had military has Sabur6 Yao and tourism. Sat6

even

perhaps Chinese first comprehensive the plan research Japanese studies. ''•5 in Yao

was

thoughtful plan and publishing series. His Japanese had the idea of studies who

was a

history Japanese and example, planning of realistic. write he

when For art

to

a was

categorization sequel. thinking literature, His already zhi, about the Riben yiwen he

was

systematic useful. literature Japanese of and into three types

was

compilations Third, translations. Riben majority either the of works his

or were

mainly of huiji translations bingyao, zhi, Liuqiu zhi lu

and dill Riben dill Riben

gao,

were

compilations writings of and Japanese Yao the of his his

rest prose.

sources; verse were

explains

why partly could be actually by himself This Yao did write much himself. not

so

and prolific Strictly speaking, creative finish nine six

and books in Yao

not

years. a

was

gifted compiler. organizer, editor, writer, but skillful and

a

basically products research of Fourth, the works Japan Yao's

strong

a were on

handicapped by comprising his lack of Japanese both Chinese scholars. and Yao team

was

heavily

depend of knowledge language the services of and had Japanese the to

on

provided scholars Among Japanese scholars. Japanese nine books which the Yao wrote,

publisher helped prefaces

three, in five, find translation for the for data and to wrote

a

writing five, Japan for and took the actual of six. in part

Military Strategist His Views and Yao

as a

changes. Wendong's Before Japan considerable attitudes toward underwent Yao

Sino-Japanese military cooperation resist the threat Japan, he he advocated to to

came

began arriving that he realize from the Russia. After Japan, in and Western to powers

by territorial ambitions in for Japan it had ideal China because

partner

was no means an

China. the North, in China resist Japan became in threat When Russia the to strove

a

taught by

compared "naughty needed be lesson Japan child" who East.

He to to a a

China:

Wendong, Japan, take I, used think that China with if the will

West to to

goes

war

advantage longer regarded going the of Japan, of it. After idea I I

to to

war

came no

irresponsibly naughty Japan Japan if with unreasonable. is like child who

acts

as a

punishment, rectify Now, itself.... Japan lenient. do will If

not not

we are we use

opportunity waiting My for North Russia the invade from the is country to us

Japan defenses situated crucial will focus North. is location. the in in I

our am a

someday. Japan might 26 that worried attack us

Kingdom Ryfikyfi warning Japan's invasion of the clear shot. How

to

was a

Ryfikyfis discourage Japan's reclaim from and ambitions Chinese the Japan how for to

territory Qing Experience important for the late Chinese. told that issues Yao

were

tangible only military peaceful negotiations strength lead and would results not to any

,ky•, 2• Kindai krsh6 shi

Nit-Ch• ken 10. p. no

Dongcha 26 zazhu. See footnote 4. 18

counted

the international in

Hence, agreed he

sending

that

Japan

arena. troops to

was

only China's option:

Now,

the situation is that

important

is

than Envoys power from

more

reason.

different

nations

have tried negotiate Japan

with in order

to reach peaceful

to

a

solution

but

in vain. Even their

if

broken,

Japan tongues

still deaf

tums are

a

ear

Regarding

Ryfikyfi

the

if Japan

islands,

of its want only

case, to

return two we

war

and negotiation

achieve this. not Recently, both the

ministers capital in the can and

public the

have paying been

attention this issue and sending advocate to

troops

many

Japan.

think I this is only the to

pride. national 27 protect to way our

How China

for military this campaign? to believed Yao was that prepare the

most

important

thing

understand Japan, particular in its geography to politics.

and Liuqiu was

dill

zhi

written demonstrate

Ryfikyfi that the Kingdom to

was

Japan of part

never was

a

historically

geographically.

bingyao Riben

dill

be

or used

of

meant

to

was

as source a

invading tactics

for

Japan reclaiming

and Ryfikyfi

the

Islands. letter In the of Bureau

to

a

Military the Beijing, in he underscored:

Japan

and

neighbors.

country Our officials and

scholars do our attention

are not

pay

Japan's

geography

and

affairs, its to

because

look down

current

it

we upon

as a

small

If

the breaks

country.

between the

countries, China out

will know

two war

not

what Wendong, do. I,

regardless to of ability, have

searched for books in

my poor

this [Japan],

and country

translated complied and them into book entitled

Riben

a

bingyao.

dili

aims It providing military tactics for the at future. 28

suggested Yao

tactics attacking for

Japan: The two

best tactic swallow

to

was

Japan

and make it

vassal of China. The option

best second state

demonstrate

a

to

was

military China's by strength

sending punitive

expedition Japan.

Then Japan would to

a

not

dare offend again. China held: He to

Now have

opportunity the

Japan send

and make troops to province it we of to

to

a

China and

vassal the in Together East.

Taiwan, with state Japan become will our

a

military

base for China.

This

is the best tactic. If should

threaten Japan not,

we

military with

give and then

waming. it

Then, Japan

will our powers dare not

a to

rebel

and

will

have This the is not to best second 29 tactic. we worry anymore.

insightful

Yao

enough

point that the decisive battles between to China out

was Japan and

would

be in the

Japan Because

island nation,

if China

wanted it, sea.

attack

an was

to

China had its

send fleet

Geographically, Japan.

to the to

Japan of

the west coast

most

was

direct and

convenient

but reminded target, Yao his that China should countrymen

not

Japan attack

from the because it

heavily be would guarded. west This coast the main

was

why

the

Yuan failed

twice

invade

troops Japan. The reason to

attack Japan correct

to

way

would from be different

directions.

Japan If

be would unable defend itself because it so, to

27 Ibid.

28 Ibid.

29 Ibid. 19

places easily.

This different coastlines, land long could and Chinese such has at troops

a

Japan. British, American, fleets why Russian

the and

the

won over reason was

by they the The large surrounded and

Japan four islands of

The not

sea.

are are

Pinghu During

the Battle land, military the in the but in crucial factor lies not

sea.

Japan thus could Mongols] only and period, attacked the [the of the Yuan west coast

period, Tokugawa the American

the and battle. the In its defenses

concentrate

won

Osaka

advanced into Shimoda, and warships Uchiga fleets Russian and the entered

Nagasaki. They Hakodate and later navies sailed Masada, and the British into

Japan failed defend Thus, and did show fixed and there here moved to pattern. not

a

Japan shocked. collapsed by nation of entire coastline itself. The its entire and

was

only

•j• I• lucky I_l_l Sany6 that [1780-1832] Yuan remarked: "We Rai troops

were

and different they directions from had If attacked from direction.

come

us one

damage would and its loose ends traffic, would have been blocked

troops at

our our

strategists judgment. All imagination." beyond This is such been have accurate

an

geographers 3° and should know this.

period,

Sino-Japanese traffic Qing pointed during the late that Yao

out sea

Nagasaki Nagasaki,

Shanghai from

from main first followed The to two routes. route

was

stressed that under finally Yokohama. Sea, Inland and from K6be He K6be via the to to

of the islands Japan because attack should China take this circumstances route to many no

islands, the in and hide themselves able dock Japanese would be the Inland in Sea. The to

of Shimonoseki the Straits waiting opportunity Moreover, ambush the invaders. for the to

hardly and entered, could it that the fleet natural

It

retreat

trap. once was so narrow was a

easily would be annihilated.

Ocean,

Pacific and via the Yokohama Hong Kong The second from to route

was

Japan because the Tokyo. attack ideal This then from Yokohama

route to to

was an

high

Once extremely invaders the

difficult the find it Japanese fleet would stop to

seas. on

Knowing Japan that victory certain. would be Yokohama, their Chinese landed in

troops

plans

strategic suggested Yokohama, heavily station in would Yao to troops some

Yokohama would attack the main force modified tactic that facilitate the attack. The

was

simultaneously launch their supplementary forces would Ocean, from Pacific and five the

supplementary

follows: forces Japan. of

These attack different parts

at

as

were

islands; outlying Iki, Tsushima, (1) and other from Korea to

conquer

Nagasaki (2) Saga; from to

conquer

Yokohama; sail and then down (3) Hakodate Manchuria and Sakhalin from to

to

conquer

land; Tokyo by Niigata and then (4) land and in march from China

to to

Nagasaki Kagoshima Kagoshima, and Fujian and from (5) and Taiwan from to to

conquer

Tokyo.

strategic points Japan: of six national the further detailed the Yao to

conquer

ways

Osaka

and K6be the fortresses of Japan, Tokyo fortresses in Yokohama

the East and

as as

and Shimonoseki the Nagasaki Japan, fortress of South central the Japan, most

as

as

conquered Chinese these six important believed the if that Japan. fortress of He troops

:• •t• ]• ]g• :• •J2 _• congchao/J• (Collection World Xiaofang of yudi Documents 30 huzhai

on

•, (Shanghai: Zhuyitang, 1877-97), 53, Geography), 8177. Xiqi vol. q: Wang ed. p. 20

places,

Japan all of would fall into their

hands. Each places these of

had

its natural

own

barriers.

the If Chinese them,

take the fall places these of six just

will be

of time.

matter

a

These

natural barriers Uraga Tokyo for

Yokohama, and Akashi, Kafuto,

Yfira, and are

Naruto

for

Kobe, 'saka and Yamakawa for Nagasaki,

and Tsushima and for Iki

Shimonoseki.

strategic These ideas

generally

insightful,

and grounded in his concrete were

expertise

geography in

his and extensive

research Japan. really China

If

31 had wanted

on

attack Japanese the homeland, to

this

book would

have been invaluable

reference. His

an

book

seriously taken

by the Chinese

became and only

was

Yao's government book

published by

the Zongli Regardless Yamen.

quality its of

usefulness, and however,

the

book has major shortcomings. three

First, Yao imbued

with

Chinese chauvinism. suggested invading He

Japan

was

so

that China

could

its campaign, Russian comparing concentrate Zhuge •=• it

Liang's on

to

famous

tactics: order "In

the

provinces, central should pacify to first the

conquer

we

Southern

barbarians."

still

He held China-centered ideology

regarded and to other

a

nations

barbarians.

preface the In the

bmgyao, Riben dill strongly he as to supported the

Qing's

military

actions

in Taiwan and its Northwest border

regretted and

at

that

to

see

China missed "three

golden

opportunities of last the years"

200 Southeast

to

conquer

Asia,

Russia, and India. added He that occupation the Japan of would the be fourth

opportunity

that China

miss.

These 32 ideas of imperialistic, must not

sorts

were

unrealistic, irresponsible. and

Second,

ideas

Yao's contradictory unjust. and

condemning While

Japan's were

action Ryfikyfi in the

Islands,

he

asked

China send Japan into Chinese

troops to

to turn

a

province. this Was

for Historically eye?

speaking, Ryfikyfi Kingdom

the

eye an an

was

territory,

Chinese

only tributary but

just

have would

It been never for a China state.

a

to

help

Ryfikyfi

the Kingdom

sovereignty, its

but Ryfikyfi the to

restore incident

not

to

use

as

invade Japan and swallow Kingdom. pretext Ryfikyfi the to a

Third,

by blinded Yao

nationalism fully did and understand

situation the in was not

China Japan. and overlooked He problems the in the Chinese

and overrated

government

military Chinese capabilities.

claimed

He that "our Northern Fleets resist Japan and

can

Russia, and

Southern

Fleets

resist Kingdom the United and Although

France. our ''3•

can

he witnessed

the Meiji of Japan, his

pride nationalist made difficult it progress for him

to

the international

order accept in which

Japan and China equals. biggest His

new

were

mistake that he

underestimated military the capacity Japan. of In was Li

contrast,

Shuchang

realistic: fleets,

"Our with

exception the •, Zhenyuan • of was more and

Dingyuan •_.,

better than

the Japanese fleets. afraid

I not

that

were

not

am are we

superior the

Japanese.

Sine-Japanese The ''a4 proved to War that Li's observation

even

optimistic,

mention Yao's. too to not was

31

However, points R. D. Howland

that the

data in Yao's

book out somewhat

outdated and

were

problematic.

of See Civilizat•on, Borders Chinese

175.

p.

Xiaofang 32 congchao, yudi huzhai 8177-78. pp.

Dongcha 33 See zazhu. footnote 4.

Shuchang, 34 See Li "Chushi Shuchang

dachen

Li

jinri michen

qingxing pian"/• Riben

72• []

• [•

"•

• • •

• •: • •, • k.• [] []

(Memorandum

the Secretly Situation Recent Japan, in on 21

Concluding Remarks

Japanology Sino- important Wendong and contributions Chinese made Yao to

interchange. translate Chinese cultural remembered the first Japanese should be He to

as

prolific

Chinese series, and Japanese books studies the Japanese promote most to

a

Japanologist early Sino-Japanese time, collaboration. research of his of and promoter

an

scholarship. First, major shortcomings However,

there his

in Yao several not

was an were

implications. scholar, military primary geography all-round and its He and his interest

was

tradition,

Japan's systematic important did have clear and view of such

matters not

as a

Meiji reforms, conservative Sino-Japanese chauvinistic and the and relations.

He was so

this held and the lessons hesitated admit of modernization that he in Japan the to

success

six-year

Japan. His for of Second, in China. make best his did the Yao stay

not

use

understanding Tokyo,

mainly Japan of less activities his confined and thus

to

was were

complete. mostly and Chinese literature than friends scholars of Japanese His were

intellectuals, intellectual and the conservative their ideas did and represent not

new

study Japanese Meiji the cultural did Japan. in make To Yao not currents matters

worse,

language help Japanese hardly of his Japanese and without the could read

sources

deprived shortcomings handicapped scholarship of him the assistants. of these his All and

reputation by Japanologists. of achieved first-rate Chinese sort

Qing Guangxu by Shuchang, Japan) Zhong- (1890), of Mission the chao Submitted Head Li in to

fiaoshe shiliao 100. Ri xuanji, p. 22