Annex XIII - Additional Background Materials (Part B) for NEA O&M Costs

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Annex XIII - Additional Background Materials (Part B) for NEA O&M Costs Clarifications on the letters of commitments and co-financing from the project partners $ amount $ amount $ amount $ Amount stated in outside of Partner $ Amount stated in FP occurring in excluded from Notes commitment letter project period project period co-financing for O&M 1. The MoENRP co-financing letter was signed on 3 May 2017. It refers to the total co-financing amount of $34.75 million with NEA 20-year O&M costs for hydrometeorological monitoring equipment of $23.16 million that originally included above all 4 new mini radars to be purchased with the GCF funds. For the first submission to GCF on 5 June, UNDP and the GoG explored opportunities for reducing the total GCF budget request. Based on the consultations with MoENRP and NEA, the government reduced its request for hydrometeorological monitoring equipment, removing the 4 mini-radars from the proposal. As a result the total O&M costs under the NEA co-financing were reduced by the amount corresponding to the O&M for the 4 mini radars ($39,000 x 4 radars x 20 years = $3.120 mln). $3.120 mln were excluded from co- MOENRP 12 778 000 34 750 000 12 778 000 18 852 000 3 120 000 financing and from O&M estimates. Therefore, the total 20-year O&M costs for equipment were estimated as $20.04 million. The equipment will be purchased by Year 2 of the project; Therefore disbursement of the NEA O&M costs will start from Year 3 of the project. Therefore, 5-year NEA O&M costs ($ 5.01 mln) were included in total MoENRP co-financing reflected in the FP (US$ 12.778). 2. NEA co-financing also included 20-year data management costs of $5.88 mln; out of these 7-year data management costs ($2.058 ) were counded as co-financing occuring in project period; the rest 13-year data management costs were counted as O&M outside of the project period. See Annex XIII - Additional background materials (part b) for NEA O&M costs. MOA 600 000 2 400 000 600 000 1 800 000 O&M starts from year 3; 5-year O&M costs included as co-financing SDC 5 000 000 5 000 000 5 000 000 MIA 16 537 694 16 537 694 16 537 694 MRDI 7 271 730 7 271 730 7 271 730 Construction costs under activity 3.3. Tbilisi Tbilisi funds for the implementation of PDNA and annual river bank rpotection works were not 1 051 600 13 151 600 1 051 600 12 100 000 Municipality included as co-financing as they were not considered new and additional Local - 3 146 972 3 146 972 O&M for flood defence structures Governments 1391-01-2-201704281042 N 01/1391 28/04/2017 To: Mr. Niels Scott Subject: a letter of commitment for participation in implementation and co-financing of the project “Scaling-up Multi-Hazard Early Warning System and the Use of Climate Information in Georgia” UN Resident Coordinator/ UNDP Resident Representative in Georgia Your Excellency, The Ministry of Regional Development and Infrastructure of Georgia (MRDI) fully supports the proposed GCF project: Scaling-up Multi-Hazard Early Warning System and the Use of Climate Information in Georgia, given its importance for increasing the resilience of Georgian people, their assets and critical infrastructure to climate induced disaster risks. Herewith, we confirm our commitment to participate in the implementation of community resilience structural measures of the project with high risk reduction potential through co-funding construction, commissioning and supervision, including environmental compliance supervision. Our co-financing of the given activity is USD 7 271 730 during the whole implementation period of the project (2018-2023) that includes the cost of implementation of a number of community resilience structural measures of the project with high risk reduction potential (Please refer to Annex to this letter for the list of locations to be funded and implemented by MRDI). In addition to above, the MRDI as one of the major partners and stakeholders of the project will actively participate in developing multi-hazard risk reduction plans for 11 river basins envisaged under the project, through providing its experts advice on priority structural measures and feasibility studies of these plans. We would like to thank the GCF and UNDP for the continued support in addressing current and future climate challenges in Georgia. Sincerely, Zurab Alavidze Minister ANNEX Tentative Cost (USD) Site Location River # (Village/Town) GCF 1 Gaghma Kodori Rioni 291,250 2 Sagvichio Rioni 699,000 3 Gori Liakhvi 545,580 4 Alaverdi Khodashniskhevi 1,372,300 5 Siriachkoni (Sagvichio) Rioni 582,500 6 Narionali (Guleikari) Rioni 640,750 7 Vazisubani Rioni 407,750 8 Patara Poti (Shavgele) Rioni 2,330,000 9 Milari (Anaga) Alazani 207,000 10 Telavi Telaviskhevi 195,600 TOTAL 7,271,730 Annex 1 National Environmental Agency - co-financing Table 1: Equipment Operation and Maintenance (O&M) costs for 20 years in thousand USD Activities \ year 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 1 9 20 Total The cost for 2 upper air sounding stations supplies with 170 170 170 170 170 170 170 170 170 170 170 170 170 170 170 170 170 170 170 170 3,400 radiosondes and latex membranes 5 big and 4 mini meteorological radars operations and 720 720 720 720 720 720 720 720 720 720 720 720 720 720 720 720 720 720 720 720 14,400 maintenance (O&M) cost per year including staff salaries The O&M costs for purchased standard and specialized (meteorological, agro-meteorological, road 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 800 meteorological, upper air sounding) stations and posts The cost for spare parts (sensors, filters, etc.) of the observation equipment; the total cost for 20 years 20 20 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 920 operations and maintenance is USD 0.9 million The O&M cost for purchased telecommunication equipment and the costs for the data transfer on national 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 1,440 and international levels and corresponding salaries The total cost for the operations and maintenance of existing Geological network including the monitoring 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 2,200 observation and operation of the network operation and geological monitoring costs Total (table 1) 1,132 1,132 1,147 1,147 1,147 1,147 1,147 1,147 1,147 1,147 1,172 1,172 1,172 1,172 1,172 1,172 1,172 1,172 1,172 1,172 23,160 Table 2: Data management and EWS operation costs for 20 years in thousand USD Activities \ year 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 1 9 20 Total The cost for creation of the early warnings related to the disasters connected with weather and water including 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 3,000 staff salaries The cost of hydro-meteorological hazards and risk zones periodic assessment, detection and mapping including the 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 1,440 staff remuneration The total cost for Geological data processing and reporting, including cadaster and geological hazard and 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 1,440 risk zoning maps periodic updating including the staff remuneration Total (table 2) 294 294 294 294 294 294 294 294 294 294 294 294 294 294 294 294 294 294 294 294 5,880 Total (table 1 and table 2) 1,426 1,426 1,441 1,441 1,441 1,441 1,441 1,441 1,441 1,441 1,466 1,466 1,466 1,466 1,466 1,466 1,466 1,466 1,466 1,466 29,040 N 1924/01 1924-01-2-201705251653 25/05/2017 To: Mr. Niels Scott UN Resident Coordinator/ UNDP Resident Representative in Georgia Subject: a letter of commitment for the implementation, co-financing and Operation and Maintenance (O&M) for GCF supported project “Scaling-up Multi-Hazard Early Warning System and the Use of Climate Information in Georgia” Your Excellency, The Ministry of Agriculture of Georgia (MoA) presents its compliments to the UN/ Resident coordinator and UNDP country office representation in Georgia and expresses sincere gratitude for fruitful cooperation on number of projects in Georgia. Georgia’s agricultural sector plays a key role in the country’s economy. Georgian farmers are going to fulfill a principal role in providing one of the fundamental needs of society: a safe, secure, and affordable food supply. This underlines the importance of the relationship between climate change impacts on agriculture and food security. During last decades negative consequences of climate change have drastically reduced agricultural productivity. Increasing frequency of natural hazards, makes overall adaptation to climate change in agriculture a priority on national level, focused on developing relevant Climate Smart Agriculture and Disaster Risk Reduction measures. Establishment of early warning system is vitally important for us. In its Intended Nationally Determined contribution/INDC (in frames of UNFCCC Paris Agreement), Georgia declared that “For the adaptation of agricultural sector to the expected climate change, wide range of measures are planned.
Recommended publications
  • FÁK Állomáskódok
    Állomáskód Orosz név Latin név Vasút kódja Államnév orosz Államnév latin Államkód 406513 1 МАЯ 1 MAIA 22 УКРАИНА UKRAINE UA 804 085827 ААКРЕ AAKRE 26 ЭСТОНИЯ ESTONIA EE 233 574066 ААПСТА AAPSTA 28 ГРУЗИЯ GEORGIA GE 268 085780 ААРДЛА AARDLA 26 ЭСТОНИЯ ESTONIA EE 233 269116 АБАБКОВО ABABKOVO 20 РОССИЙСКАЯ ФЕДЕРАЦИЯ RUSSIAN FEDERATION RU 643 737139 АБАДАН ABADAN 29 УЗБЕКИСТАН UZBEKISTAN UZ 860 753112 АБАДАН-I ABADAN-I 67 ТУРКМЕНИСТАН TURKMENISTAN TM 795 753108 АБАДАН-II ABADAN-II 67 ТУРКМЕНИСТАН TURKMENISTAN TM 795 535004 АБАДЗЕХСКАЯ ABADZEHSKAIA 20 РОССИЙСКАЯ ФЕДЕРАЦИЯ RUSSIAN FEDERATION RU 643 795736 АБАЕВСКИЙ ABAEVSKII 20 РОССИЙСКАЯ ФЕДЕРАЦИЯ RUSSIAN FEDERATION RU 643 864300 АБАГУР-ЛЕСНОЙ ABAGUR-LESNOI 20 РОССИЙСКАЯ ФЕДЕРАЦИЯ RUSSIAN FEDERATION RU 643 865065 АБАГУРОВСКИЙ (РЗД) ABAGUROVSKII (RZD) 20 РОССИЙСКАЯ ФЕДЕРАЦИЯ RUSSIAN FEDERATION RU 643 699767 АБАИЛ ABAIL 27 КАЗАХСТАН REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN KZ 398 888004 АБАКАН ABAKAN 20 РОССИЙСКАЯ ФЕДЕРАЦИЯ RUSSIAN FEDERATION RU 643 888108 АБАКАН (ПЕРЕВ.) ABAKAN (PEREV.) 20 РОССИЙСКАЯ ФЕДЕРАЦИЯ RUSSIAN FEDERATION RU 643 398904 АБАКЛИЯ ABAKLIIA 23 МОЛДАВИЯ MOLDOVA, REPUBLIC OF MD 498 889401 АБАКУМОВКА (РЗД) ABAKUMOVKA 20 РОССИЙСКАЯ ФЕДЕРАЦИЯ RUSSIAN FEDERATION RU 643 882309 АБАЛАКОВО ABALAKOVO 20 РОССИЙСКАЯ ФЕДЕРАЦИЯ RUSSIAN FEDERATION RU 643 408006 АБАМЕЛИКОВО ABAMELIKOVO 22 УКРАИНА UKRAINE UA 804 571706 АБАША ABASHA 28 ГРУЗИЯ GEORGIA GE 268 887500 АБАЗА ABAZA 20 РОССИЙСКАЯ ФЕДЕРАЦИЯ RUSSIAN FEDERATION RU 643 887406 АБАЗА (ЭКСП.) ABAZA (EKSP.) 20 РОССИЙСКАЯ ФЕДЕРАЦИЯ RUSSIAN FEDERATION RU 643
    [Show full text]
  • Ethnobiology of Georgia
    SHOTA TUSTAVELI ZAAL KIKVIDZE NATIONAL SCIENCE FUNDATION ILIA STATE UNIVERSITY PRESS ETHNOBIOLOGY OF GEORGIA ISBN 978-9941-18-350-8 Tbilisi 2020 Ethnobiology of Georgia 2020 Zaal Kikvidze Preface My full-time dedication to ethnobiology started in 2012, since when it has never failed to fascinate me. Ethnobiology is a relatively young science with many blank areas still in its landscape, which is, perhaps, good motivation to write a synthetic text aimed at bridging the existing gaps. At this stage, however, an exhaustive representation of materials relevant to the ethnobiology of Georgia would be an insurmountable task for one author. My goal, rather, is to provide students and researchers with an introduction to my country’s ethnobiology. This book, therefore, is about the key traditions that have developed over a long history of interactions between humans and nature in Georgia, as documented by modern ethnobiologists. Acknowledgements: I am grateful to my colleagues – Rainer Bussmann, Narel Paniagua Zambrana, David Kikodze and Shalva Sikharulidze for the exciting and fruitful discussions about ethnobiology, and their encouragement for pushing forth this project. Rainer Bussmann read the early draft of this text and I am grateful for his valuable comments. Special thanks are due to Jana Ekhvaia, for her crucial contribution as project coordinator and I greatly appreciate the constant support from the staff and administration of Ilia State University. Finally, I am indebted to my fairy wordmother, Kate Hughes whose help was indispensable at the later stages of preparation of this manuscript. 2 Table of contents Preface.......................................................................................................................................................... 2 Chapter 1. A brief introduction to ethnobiology......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 6. Imereti – Historical-Cultural Overview
    SFG2110 SECOND REGIONAL DEVELOPMETN PROJECT IMERETI REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM IMERETI TOURISM DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY Public Disclosure Authorized STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL, CULTURAL HERITAGE AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Tbilisi, December, 2014 ABBREVIATIONS GNTA Georgia National Tourism Administration EIA Environnemental Impact Assessment EMP Environmental Management Plan EMS Environmental Management System IFI International Financial Institution IRDS Imereti Regional Development Strategy ITDS Imereti Tourism Development Strategy MDF Municipal Development Fund of Georgia MoA Ministry of Agriculture MoENRP Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources Protection of Georgia MoIA Ministry of Internal Affairs MoCMP Ministry of Culture and Monument Protection MoJ Ministry of Justice MoESD Ministry of Economic and Sustaineble Developmnet NACHP National Agency for Cultural Heritage Protection PIU Project Implementation Unit PPE Personal protective equipment RDP Regional Development Project SECHSA Strategic Environmental, Cultural Heritage and Social Assessment WB World Bank Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................................... 0 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................... 14 1.1 PROJECT CONTEXT ...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Fisheries and Aquaculture Development Potentials in Georgia
    FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Circular No. 1055/1 REU/C1055/1(En) ISSN 2070-6065 REVIEW OF FISHERIES AND AQUACULTURE DEVELOPMENT POTENTIALS IN GEORGIA Copies of FAO publications can be requested from: Sales and Marketing Group Office of Knowledge Exchange, Research and Extension Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations E-mail: [email protected] Fax: +39 06 57053360 Web site: www.fao.org/icatalog/inter-e.htm FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Circular No. 1055/1 REU/C1055/1 (En) REVIEW OF FISHERIES AND AQUACULTURE DEVELOPMENT POTENTIALS IN GEORGIA by Marina Khavtasi † Senior Specialist Department of Integrated Environmental Management and Biodiversity Ministry of the Environment Protection and Natural Resources Tbilisi, Georgia Marina Makarova Head of Division Water Resources Protection Ministry of the Environment Protection and Natural Resources Tbilisi, Georgia Irina Lomashvili Senior Specialist Department of Integrated Environmental Management and Biodiversity Ministry of the Environment Protection and Natural Resources Tbilisi, Georgia Archil Phartsvania National Consultant Thomas Moth-Poulsen Fishery Officer FAO Regional Office for Europe and Central Asia Budapest, Hungary András Woynarovich FAO Consultant FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Rome, 2010 The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Presidential Election First Interim Report of the Pre-Election Monitoring
    2018 Presidential Election First Interim Report of the Pre-Election Monitoring (August 1 - September 8) 13 September 2018 This report is made possible by the generous support of the American people through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) and the National Endowment for Democracy (NED). Views expressed in this publication belong solely to the International Society for Fair Elections and Democracy and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID, the United States Government or the NED. Table of Contents I. Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 2 II. Key Findings ........................................................................................................................................ 2 III. Recommendations ......................................................................................................................... 4 IV. Electoral Administration ............................................................................................................. 5 Appointment of Temporary Members of DECs ................................................................................. 5 V. Media environment ........................................................................................................................ 9 VI. Intimidation/harassment on alleged political grounds ...................................................... 12 VII. Physical confrontation ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Some Notes on the Topography of Eastern Pontos Euxeinos in Late Antiquity and Early
    Andrei Vinogradov SOME NOTES ON THE TOPOGRAPHY OF EASTERN PONTOS EUXEINOS IN LATE ANTIQUITY AND EARLY BYZANTIUM BASIC RESEARCH PROGRAM WORKING PAPERS SERIES: HUMANITIES WP BRP 82/HUM/2014 This Working Paper is an output of a research project implemented within NRU HSE’s Annual Thematic Plan for Basic and Applied Research. Any opinions or claims contained in this Working Paper do not necessarily reflect the views of HSE. Andrei Vinogradov1 SOME NOTES ON THE TOPOGRAPHY OF EASTERN PONTOS EUXEINOS IN LATE ANTIQUITY AND EARLY BYZANTIUM2 This paper clarifies some issues of late antique and early Byzantine topography of Eastern Pontos Euxeinos. These questions can be divided into two large groups: the ecclesiastical topography and the locations of Byzantine fortresses. The earliest testimony of Apostolic preaching on the Eastern black sea coast—the list of the apostles by Pseudo- Epiphanius—following the ‘Chronicon’ of Hyppolitus of Rome, unsuccessfully connects South- Eastern Pontos Euxeinos to Sebastopolis the Great (modern Sukhumi), which subsequently gives rise to an itinerary of the apostle Andrew. The Early Byzantine Church in the region had a complicated arrangement: the Zekchians, Abasgians and possibly Apsilians had their own bishoprics (later archbishoprics); the Lazicans had a metropolitan in Phasis (and not in their capital Archaeopolis) with five bishop-suffragans. Byzantine fortresses, mentioned in 7th c sources, are located mostly in Apsilia and Missimiania, in the Kodori valley, which had strategic importance as a route from
    [Show full text]
  • Reserved Domains
    Countries: (.ge; .edu.ge; .org.ge; .net.ge; .pvt.ge; .school.ge) afghanistan cameroon ghana lebanon nigeria spain zambia albania canada greece lesotho norway srilanka zimbabwe algeria centralafricanrepublic grenada liberia oman sudan andorra chad guatemala libya pakistan suriname angola chile guinea liechtenstein palau swaziland antiguaandbarbuda china guinea-bissau lithuania palestina sweden argentina colombia guyana luxembourg panama switzerland armenia comoros haiti macau papuanewguinea syria aruba congo honduras macedonia paraguay taiwan australia costarica hongkong madagascar peru tajikistan austria croatia hungary malawi philippines tanzania azerbaijan cuba iceland malaysia poland thailand bahama curacao india maldives portugal timor-leste bahrain cyprus indonesia mali qatar togo bangladesh czechia iran malta romania tonga barbados denmark iraq marshallislands russia trinidadandtobago belarus djibouti ireland mauritania rwanda tunisia belgium dominica israel mauritius saintlucia turkey belize dominicanrepublic italy mexico samoa turkmenistan benin ecuador jamaica micronesia sanmarino tuvalu bhutan egypt japan moldova saudiarabia uganda birma elsalvador jordan monaco senegal ukraine bolivia equatorialguinea kazakhstan mongolia serbia unitedarabemirates bosniaandherzegovina eritrea kenya montenegro seychelles uk botswana estonia kiribati morocco sierraleone england brazil ethiopia northkorea mozambique singapore unitedkingdom brunei fiji korea namibia sintmaarten uruguay bulgaria finland southkorea nauru slovakia uzbekistan burkinafaso
    [Show full text]
  • Realizing the Urban Potential in Georgia: National Urban Assessment
    REALIZING THE URBAN POTENTIAL IN GEORGIA National Urban Assessment ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK REALIZING THE URBAN POTENTIAL IN GEORGIA NATIONAL URBAN ASSESSMENT ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 IGO license (CC BY 3.0 IGO) © 2016 Asian Development Bank 6 ADB Avenue, Mandaluyong City, 1550 Metro Manila, Philippines Tel +63 2 632 4444; Fax +63 2 636 2444 www.adb.org Some rights reserved. Published in 2016. Printed in the Philippines. ISBN 978-92-9257-352-2 (Print), 978-92-9257-353-9 (e-ISBN) Publication Stock No. RPT168254 Cataloging-In-Publication Data Asian Development Bank. Realizing the urban potential in Georgia—National urban assessment. Mandaluyong City, Philippines: Asian Development Bank, 2016. 1. Urban development.2. Georgia.3. National urban assessment, strategy, and road maps. I. Asian Development Bank. The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Asian Development Bank (ADB) or its Board of Governors or the governments they represent. ADB does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this publication and accepts no responsibility for any consequence of their use. This publication was finalized in November 2015 and statistical data used was from the National Statistics Office of Georgia as available at the time on http://www.geostat.ge The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by ADB in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. By making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area, or by using the term “country” in this document, ADB does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.
    [Show full text]
  • National Report on the State of the Environment of Georgia
    National Report on the State of the Environment of Georgia 2007 - 2009 FOREWORD This National Report on the State of Environment 2007-2009 has been developed in accordance with the Article 14 of the Law of Georgia on Environmental Protection and the Presidential Decree N 389 of 25 June 1999 on the Rules of Development of National Report on the State of Environment. According to the Georgian legislation, for the purpose of public information the National Report on the State of Environment shall be developed once every three years. 2007-2009 National Report was approved on 9 December 2011. National Report is a summarizing document of all existing information on the state of the environment of Georgia complexly analyzing the state of the environment of Georgia for 2007-2009. The document describes the main directions of environmental policy of the country, presents information on the qualita- tive state of the environment, also presents information on the outcomes of the environmental activities carried out within the frames of international relations, and gives the analysis of environmental impact of different economic sectors. National Report is comprised of 8 Parts and 21 chapters: • Qualitative state of environment (atmospheric air, water resources, land resources, natural disasters, biodiversity, wastes and chemicals, ionizing radiation), • Environmental impact of different economic sectors (agriculture, forestry, transport, industry and en- ergy sector), • Environmental protection management (environmental policy and planning, environmental regula- tion and monitoring, environmental education and awareness raising). In the development of the present State of Environment (SOE) the Ministry of Environment Protection was assisted by the EU funded Project Support to the Improvement of the Environmental Governance in Georgia.
    [Show full text]
  • (Annelida, Hirudinida: Erpobdellidae) – a New Cavernicolous Leech from Motena Cave in Georgia
    Ecologica Montenegrina 44: 32-43 (2021) This journal is available online at: www.biotaxa.org/em http://dx.doi.org/10.37828/em.2021.44.5 https://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:DCED2563-5223-4A73-AF87-551D45A5E971 Trocheta ariescornuta n. sp. (Annelida, Hirudinida: Erpobdellidae) – a new cavernicolous leech from Motena Cave in Georgia CLEMENS GROSSER1, SHALVA BARJADZE2 & ETER MAGHRADZE2 1Am Wasserturm 20, 04523 Elstertrebnitz, Germany; [email protected]; www.hirudinea.de 2Ilia State University Institute of Zoology, Giorgi Tsereteli 3, 0162 Tbilisi, Georgia. Received 25 June 2021 │ Accepted by V. Pešić: 27 July 2021 │ Published online 29 July 2021. Abstract A new leech species Trocheta ariescornuta n. sp. is described and illustrated here based on two specimens found in Motena Cave in western Georgia, Caucasus. This species differs from the known congeners and other similar Erpobdellids of the region, including Georgian cavernicolous leech - Dina ratschaensis Kobaķhidze, 1958 in a complex of external and internal morphological characteristics: colour, annulation, position of genital pores, shape of the genital atrium with strong coiled cornua (similar to the horns of a ram). Cave inhabitant invertebrate community for Motena Cave is provided. Key words: Hirudinida, new species, cavernicolous, stygobiont, Caucasus. Introduction The leech fauna of Georgia is not intensively researched and largely unknown. In Georgia, Kvavadze (2002) reported only 17 leech species, belonging to 3 families and 11 genera, including 7 species of Erpobdellidae. The Erpobdellid Dina ratschaensis Kobaķhidze, 1958 was described as stygobiotic leech from the Sakishore and Tsivtskala caves in the catchment area of the stream Sakishorestskali at Ratscharegion in western Georgia.
    [Show full text]
  • Caucasus Studies 2
    IMER - INTERNATIONAL MIGRATION AND ETHNIC RELATIONS MIGRATION IMER - INTERNATIONAL CAUCASUS STUDIES 2 STUDIES CAUCASUS I m Caucasus Studies 2 INTERNATIONA • ER Caucasus Studies 2 LANGUAGE,Caucasus Studies HISTOR 2Y AND CULTURAL IDENTITIES IN THE CAUCASUS l m LANGUAGE, HISTORY AND CULTURAL RE ETHNIC AND IGRATION Edited IDENTITIES by Karina Vamling IN THE CAUCASUS l The internationalEdited by conferenceKarina Vamling Language, History and Cultural Identities in the CU AND HISTORY ANGUAGE, Caucasus, 17-20 June 2005, hosted by the School of International Migration LANGUAGE, HISTORY AND CULTURAL and Ethnic Relations (IMER) at Malmö University (Sweden), brought together IDENTITIES IN THE CAUCASUS Caucasian and Western schoolars with diverse disciplinary backgrounds – l social anthropology, linguistics, literature, social psychology, political science ATIONS – who focus on the Caucasus in their research. The present volume is based on Papers from the conference, papers from this conference. June 17-19 2005, Malmö University l TURA Edited by Karina Vamling l IDENTITIES IN THE CAUCASUS THE IN IDENTITIES MALMÖ UNIVERSITY MALMÖ 2009 SE-205 06 Malmö Sweden m www.mah.se MALMÖ UNIVERSITY A ISBN 978-91-7104-088-6 2010 lmö SE-205 06 Malmö Sweden www.mah.se ISBN 978-91-7104-088-6 Caucasus Studies 1 Circassian Clause Structure Mukhadin Kumakhov & Karina Vamling 2 Language, History and Cultural Identities in the Caucasus. Papers from the conference, June 17-19 2005. Edited by Karina Vamling 3 Conference in the fields of Migration – Society – Language 28-30
    [Show full text]
  • Public Defender of Georgia
    THE REPORT OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER OF GEORGIA ON THE SITUATION OF PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS IN GEORGIA (SUMMARY) 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 5 2. SITUATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN CLOSED FACILITIES (REPORT OF THE NATIONAL PREVENTIVE MECHANISM) 12 2.1. SITUATION IN PENITENTIARY FACILITIES 12 2.2. SITUATION IN THE AGENCIES UNDER THE MINISTRY OF INTERNAL AFFAIRS OF GEORGIA 29 2.3. PROTECTION OF MIGRANTS FROM ILL-TREATMENT 30 2.4. SITUATION OF RIGHTS OF DISABLED PERSONS IN PENITENTIARY FACILITIES, IN THE FACILITIES OF INVOLUNTARY AND FORCED MENTAL CARE 32 2.5. SITUATION OF CHILDREN’S RIGHTS IN SMALL FAMILY-TYPE CHILDREN’S HOMES 34 3. AMNESTIES AND EARLY CONDITIONAL RELEASE OF PERSONS SERVING LIFE SENTENCE 37 4. FAILURE TO FULFILL THE LAWFUL REQUEST OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER OF GEORGIA 39 5. RIGHT TO LIFE 40 6. PROHIBITION OF TORTURE, INHUMANE AND DEGRADING TREATMENT AND PUNISHMENT 41 7. INDEPENDENT, IMPARTIAL AND EFFECTIVE INVESTIGATION 42 8. RIGHT TO LIBERTY AND SECURITY 44 9. RIGHT TO FAIR TRIAL 46 10. RIGHT TO RESPECT FOR PRIVATE AND FAMILY LIFE 48 11. FREEDOM OF THOUGHT, CONSCIENCE AND RELIGION 49 12. PROTECTION OF THE RIGHTS OF NATIONAL MINORITIES AND CIVIL INTEGRATION 50 13. FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION 51 14. FREEDOM OF ASSEMBLY AND MANIFESTATION 53 15. PROHIBITION OF DISCRIMINATION 54 16. FREEDOM OF MOVEMENT 56 This publication has been produced with the assistance of the European Union. The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of the author and can in no way be taken to 17. RIGHT OF PROPERTY 57 reflect the views of the European Union.
    [Show full text]