Quiz – Ffps and Alliances

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Quiz – Frequent flyer programs and alliances by Sergio Ortega | published in February 2009 1. In June 2005, two airlines that had recently 6. Star Alliance is the world’s first global airline merged founded Flying Blue, a new frequent alliance, founded in 1997 by five major airlines as flyer program (FFP). They are: depicted on their logo. Which of the following A. Air France and KLM was NOT one of them? B. ANA and Japan Airlines A. Air Canada C. KLM and Northwest Airlines B. Lufthansa D. Korean Air and Asiana Airlines C. Singapore Airlines D. United Airlines 2. Which of the following airlines is NOT a fully integrated partner of the Miles & More program? 7. Which U.S. airline announced, in 2008, its A. Lufthansa intention to move from Skyteam to Star Alliance? B. Austrian Airlines A. Continental Airlines C. Swiss International Air Lines B. Delta Air Lines D. Alitalia C. Northwest Airlines D. US Airways 3. What is the name of the oldest and largest FFP in the world? 8. True or false: Singapore Airlines is the only Star A. American Airlines AAdvantage Alliance member that, on its Star Alliance- B. Delta Air Lines SkyMiles themed aircraft, retains its original tail logo. C. Northwest Airlines WorldPerks A. True D. United Airlines Mileage Plus B. False 4. What is the name of JetBlue’s FFP? 9. What is the name of the alliance founded by A. Blue Miles Lufthansa Cargo, SAS Cargo and Singapore B. Blue Wings Airlines Cargo in 2000? C. Flying Blue A. Qualiflyer D. TrueBlue B. WOW Alliance C. Team Lufthansa 5. In 1987, Continental Airlines merged its existing D. Wings Alliance FFP with that of another airline to form OnePass. The name of this airline was... 10. What was the name of the alliance between Delta A. Braniff International Air Lines, Singapore Airlines and Swissair in the B. Eastern Airlines 1990s? C. Midway Airlines A. Atlantic Excellence D. Pan American World Airways B. AirUnion C. Global Excellence This content is available under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. For more quizzes, visit http://airodyssey.net/quizzes. Send your comments to . .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

October 2007 Atlantic Battle Plans He Euro-Majors Are Starting to Make Some Big Moves in Antici- CONTENTS Tpation of Next Year's US-EU Open Skies Regime
Aviation Strategy Issue No: 120 October 2007 Atlantic battle plans he Euro-majors are starting to make some big moves in antici- CONTENTS Tpation of next year's US-EU open skies regime. Air France has announced a comprehensive joint venture with Analysis Delta. Mirroring the long-established KLM/Northwest agreement, the two airlines will implement full revenue and cost sharing on all their services between their respective hubs (CDG, Orly and Lyons; Air France’s advance 1 Atlanta, JFK, Cincinnati and Salt Lake City), as well as the planned, from April next year, Heathrow operations. The aircraft leasing business: This is only the first phase. All the main SkyTeam members have applied for extended anti-trust immunity, the main effect being that • GECAS the AF/DL operation would combine with the KL/NW joint venture, • ILFC generating an estimated €20-30m net benefit for the Air France • Boeing Capital Corporation Group. • AerCap The assault on Fortress Heathrow has been launched with the • CIT transfer of three daily LHR slot pairs from Air France to Delta, • Babcock & Brown enabling the US carrier to fly double dailies to/from JFK plus a daily • Aviation Capital Group to Atlanta. Air France itself will operate from LHR to Los Angeles (and • RBS Aviation Capital from there connect to Tahiti, which is legally part of France). AF/KL • Pegasus Aviation has another 22 daily slots at LHR, though not all are suitable for transfer from short to long haul operations. Plus all of the other major How the passenger will benefit from all this consolidation is rather players and new entrants 2-13 unclear - unlike the KL/NW agreement which rationalised numerous thin O&D city-pairs by hubbing passengers over Amsterdam and Briefing Detroit, the AF/DL alliance focuses on cooperation on thick hub-to- hub routes, though it also should intensify competition on the very Lufthansa: Ready for lucrative LHR-JFK market.
[Show full text]
Liste-Exploitants-Aeronefs.Pdf
EN EN EN COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, XXX C(2009) XXX final COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No xxx/2009 of on the list of aircraft operators which performed an aviation activity listed in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC on or after 1 January 2006 specifying the administering Member State for each aircraft operator (Text with EEA relevance) EN EN COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No xxx/2009 of on the list of aircraft operators which performed an aviation activity listed in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC on or after 1 January 2006 specifying the administering Member State for each aircraft operator (Text with EEA relevance) THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Having regard to Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 establishing a system for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC1, and in particular Article 18a(3)(a) thereof, Whereas: (1) Directive 2003/87/EC, as amended by Directive 2008/101/EC2, includes aviation activities within the scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community (hereinafter the "Community scheme"). (2) In order to reduce the administrative burden on aircraft operators, Directive 2003/87/EC provides for one Member State to be responsible for each aircraft operator. Article 18a(1) and (2) of Directive 2003/87/EC contains the provisions governing the assignment of each aircraft operator to its administering Member State. The list of aircraft operators and their administering Member States (hereinafter "the list") should ensure that each operator knows which Member State it will be regulated by and that Member States are clear on which operators they should regulate.
[Show full text]
Peculiarities of Development of the Low-Cost Airlines in Russian and Norwegian Context
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Brage Nord Open Research Archive Logistics and transport BE303E 003 Peculiarities of development of the low-cost airlines in Russian and Norwegian context by Elena Toramanyan Spring, 2007 Abstract E. Toramanyan, Master thesis ABSTRACT Low-cost flights per se become more and more popular in the world airline industry, while in Russia the first low-cost carrier has recently appeared. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the phenomenon of low-cost carriers, peculiarities of the development of the low-cost airlines in the context of Russian Federation and Norway. In order to cover the topic, deep literature review and qualitative research were carried out. In the paper, I attempted to follow history, analyze reasons for low-cost flights, advantages and disadvantages of low-cost carriers, scrutinize perspectives and peculiarities of the low-cost airline market in Russia and Norway, and analyze future opportunities. Under these circumstances, case study method and interviews as primary information sources and reports and articles written by airline experts as secondary sources were used. Two companies were under the research: Sky Express – a Russian low-cost airline company launched the market this year, and a Norwegian low-cost airline company, a member of European Low Fares Airline Association, Norwegian Air Shuttle. Deep literature review concerning low-cost airlines and empirical findings showed that the phenomenon of low fares has its peculiarities on a particular market. In order to understand the role of context regarding the research question, I tried to find similarities and to reveal differences in the activities of two companies with the help of PESTE analysis.
[Show full text]
He Power of Partnering Under the Proper Circumstances, the Airbus A380
A MAGAZINE FOR AIRLINE EXECUTIVES 2007 Issue No. 2 T a k i n g y o u r a i r l i n e t o new heights TThehe PowerPower ofof PartneringPartnering A Conversation with Abdul Wahab Teffaha, Secretary General Arab Air Carriers Organization. Special Section I NSIDE Airline Mergers and Consolidation Carriers can quickly recover 21 from irregular operations Singapore Airlines makes 46 aviation history High-speed trains impact Eu- 74 rope’s airlines The eMergo Solutions Several products in the Sabre Airline Solutions® portfolio are available ® ® through the Sabre eMergo Web access distribution method: ™ Taking your airline to new heights • Quasar passenger revenue accounting system 2007 Issue No. 2 Editors in Chief • Revenue Integrity option within SabreSonic® Res Stephani Hawkins B. Scott Hunt 3150 Sabre Drive Southlake, Texas 76092 • Sabre® AirFlite™ Planning and Scheduling Suite www.sabreairlinesolutions.com Art Direction/Design Charles Urich • Sabre® AirMax® Revenue Management Suite Design Contributor Ben Williams Contributors • Sabre® AirPrice™ fares management system Allen Appleby, Jim Barlow, Edward Bowman, Jack Burkholder, Mark Canton, Jim Carlsen-Landy, Rick Dietert, Vinay Dube, Kristen Fritschel, Peter Goodfellow, ® ™ Dale Heimann, Ian Hunt, Carla Jensen, • Sabre CargoMax Revenue and Pricing Suite Brent Johnson, Billie Jones, Maher Koubaa, Sandra Meekins, Nancy Ornelas, Lalita Ponnekanti and Jessica Thorud. • Sabre® Loyalty Suite Publisher George Lynch Awards ® ® • Sabre Rocade Airline Operations Suite 2007 International Association of Business Communicators Bronze Quill. 2005 and 2006 International Association • Sabre® WiseVision™ Data Analysis Suite of Business Communicators Bronze Quill, Silver Quill and Gold Quill. 2004 International Association of Business ® Communicators Bronze Quill and Silver • SabreSonic Check-in Quill.
[Show full text]
The Competitive Position of Hub Airports in the Transatlantic Market
Journal of Air Transportation Vol. 11, No. 1 -2006 THE COMPETITIVE POSITION OF HUB AIRPORTS IN THE TRANSATLANTIC MARKET Guillaume Burghouwt SEO Economic Research Jan Veldhuis SEO Economic Research Amsterdam, The Netherlands ABSTRACT This article puts forward the argument that the measurement of connectivity in hub- and-spoke networks has to take into account the quality and quantity of both direct and indirect connections. The NETSCAN model, which has been applied in this study, quantifies indirect connectivity and scales it into a theoretical direct connection. NETSCAN allows researchers, airports, airlines, alliances and airport regions to analyse their competitive position in an integrated way. Using NETSCAN, the authors analysed the developments on the market between northwest Europe and the United States (US) between May 2003 and May 2005. One of the most striking developments has certainly been the impact of the Air France-KLM merger and the effects of the integration of KLM and Northwest into the SkyTeam alliance on the connectivity of Amsterdam Schiphol. Direct as well as indirect connectivity (via European and North American hubs) from Amsterdam to the US increased substantially. The main reason for this increase is the integration of the former Wings and SkyTeam networks via the respective hub airports. Moreover, the extended SkyTeam alliance raised frequencies between Amsterdam and the SkyTeam hubs (Atlanta, Houston, for example), opened new routes (Cincinnati) and boosted the network between Amsterdam and France. As a result of the new routes and frequencies, Amsterdam took over Heathrow’s position as the third best-connected northwest European airport to the US. _____________________________________________________________ Guillaume Burghouwt completed his PhD-research ‘Airline network development in Europe and its implications for airport planning’ in 2005.
[Show full text]
Air Transport in Russia and Its Impact on the Economy
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Tomsk State University Repository Вестник Томского государственного университета. Экономика. 2019. № 48 МИРОВАЯ ЭКОНОМИКА UDC 330.5, 338.4 DOI: 10.17223/19988648/48/20 V.S. Chsherbakov, O.A. Gerasimov AIR TRANSPORT IN RUSSIA AND ITS IMPACT ON THE ECONOMY The study aims to collect and analyse statistics of Russian air transport, show the in- fluence of air transport on the national economy over the period from 2007 to 2016, compare the sector’s role in Russia with the one in other countries. The study reveals the significance of air transport for Russian economy by comparing airlines’ and air- ports’ monetary output to the gross domestic product. On the basis of the research, the policies in the aviation sector can be adjusted by government authorities. Ключевые слова: Russia, aviation, GDP, economic impact, air transport, statistics. Introduction According to Air Transport Action Group, the air transport industry supports 62.7 million jobs globally and aviation’s total global economic impact is $2.7 trillion (approximately 3.5% of the Gross World Product) [1]. Aviation transported 4 billion passengers in 2017, which is more than a half of world population, according to the International Civil Aviation Organization [2]. It makes the industry one of the most important ones in the world. It has a consid- erable effect on national economies by providing a huge number of employment opportunities both directly and indirectly in such spheres as tourism, retail, manufacturing, agriculture, and so on. Air transport is a driving force behind economic connection between different regions because it may entail economic, political, and social effects.
[Show full text]
Skyteam Global Airline Alliance
Annual Report 2005 2005 Aeroflot made rapid progress towards membership of the SkyTeam global airline alliance Aeroflot became the first Russian airline to pass the IATA (IOSA) operational safety audit Aeroflot annual report 2005 Contents KEY FIGURES > 3 CEO’S ADDRESS TO SHAREHOLDERS> 4 MAIN EVENTS IN 2005 > 6 IMPLEMENTING COMPANY STRATEGY: RESULTS IN 2005 AND PRIORITY TASKS FOR 2006 Strengthening market positions > 10 Creating conditions for long-term growth > 10 Guaranteeing a competitive product > 11 Raising operating efficiency > 11 Developing the personnel management system > 11 Tasks for 2006 > 11 AIR TRAFFIC MARKET Global air traffic market > 14 The passenger traffic market in Russia > 14 Russian airlines: main events in 2005 > 15 Market position of Aeroflot Group > 15 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE Governing bodies > 18 Financial and business control > 23 Information disclosure > 25 BUSINESS IN 2005 Safety > 28 Passenger traffic > 30 Cargo traffic > 35 Cooperation with other air companies > 38 Joining the SkyTeam alliance > 38 Construction of the new terminal complex, Sheremetyevo-3 > 40 Business of Aeroflot subsidiaries > 41 Aircraft fleet > 43 IT development > 44 Quality management > 45 RISK MANAGEMENT Sector risks > 48 Financial risks > 49 Insurance programs > 49 Flight safety risk management > 49 PERSONNEL AND SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY Personnel > 52 Charity activities > 54 Environment > 55 SHAREHOLDERS AND INVESTORS Share capital > 58 Securities > 59 Dividend history > 61 Important events since December 31, 2005 > 61 FINANCIAL REPORT Statement
[Show full text]
Prof. Paul Stephen Dempsey
AIRLINE ALLIANCES by Paul Stephen Dempsey Director, Institute of Air & Space Law McGill University Copyright © 2008 by Paul Stephen Dempsey Before Alliances, there was Pan American World Airways . and Trans World Airlines. Before the mega- Alliances, there was interlining, facilitated by IATA Like dogs marking territory, airlines around the world are sniffing each other's tail fins looking for partners." Daniel Riordan “The hardest thing in working on an alliance is to coordinate the activities of people who have different instincts and a different language, and maybe worship slightly different travel gods, to get them to work together in a culture that allows them to respect each other’s habits and convictions, and yet work productively together in an environment in which you can’t specify everything in advance.” Michael E. Levine “Beware a pact with the devil.” Martin Shugrue Airline Motivations For Alliances • the desire to achieve greater economies of scale, scope, and density; • the desire to reduce costs by consolidating redundant operations; • the need to improve revenue by reducing the level of competition wherever possible as markets are liberalized; and • the desire to skirt around the nationality rules which prohibit multinational ownership and cabotage. Intercarrier Agreements · Ticketing-and-Baggage Agreements · Joint-Fare Agreements · Reciprocal Airport Agreements · Blocked Space Relationships · Computer Reservations Systems Joint Ventures · Joint Sales Offices and Telephone Centers · E-Commerce Joint Ventures · Frequent Flyer Program Alliances · Pooling Traffic & Revenue · Code-Sharing Code Sharing The term "code" refers to the identifier used in flight schedule, generally the 2-character IATA carrier designator code and flight number. Thus, XX123, flight 123 operated by the airline XX, might also be sold by airline YY as YY456 and by ZZ as ZZ9876.
[Show full text]
Anastasiya Burmakina-Fleming [email protected] 127 Milkweed Lane, Bunker Hill, WV 25413 Cell: 304-433-4479
Anastasiya Burmakina-Fleming [email protected] 127 Milkweed Lane, Bunker Hill, WV 25413 cell: 304-433-4479 Source/Target language: English/Russian to Russian/English Fields of expertise: aviation, traveling, mass media, fashion industry, beauty, nutrition, cooking, blogging. EXPERIENCE 2012 - present time Translator/Interpreter, Free-lancer; Teacher, English-by-Skype Duties and Responsibilities: a) translate text from English to Russian/Russian to English in the aviation field, food, diet, nutrition, fashion, beauty, etc. b) teaching English to Russian speakers via Skype. Proofreading/editing: English to Russian for www.Ebay.com and Lingotek. 2011 Catering Supervisor, Sodexo, Inc., Winchester, VA. a) coordinated room layouts for the catering department, maintained bar inventory for functions; planned special events of several hundred guests, b) accommodated client requests/concerns. 2008 – 2009 Head of Agreements and Claims/Translator, Airlines Atlant-Soyuz, Moscow. a) maintained Aircraft Lease Agreements , b) revised invoices in accordance with agreement terms and conditions. Translation: accounting paperwork, legal documents for Russian Customs, Lease/Purchase Agreement for Aircraft Spare Parts 2008 Senior Specialist of Contracts and Agreements/Translator, AirUnion Airlines, Moscow. a) gathered and translated documents for the Customs procedures for aircraft operation in Russian territory, b) negotiated/interpreted with top management regarding Lease conditions and mutual preparation of the Lease Agreement of Boeing aircraft with
[Show full text]
Tendencje Rozwojowe Aliansów Strategicznych W Transporcie Lotniczym
Transport lotniczy Tendencje rozwojowe aliansów strategicznych w transporcie lotniczym Iwona Anna Czarnecka Alianse lotnicze są formą współpracy linii lotniczych (często konkurujących ze sobą). Uczestnictwo w aliansie to określone korzyści, ale także liczne zagrożenia. A jednak wynikający z procesów liberalizacji proces łączenia się przewoźników w alianse wykazuje tendencję rozwojową. Na przestrzeni lat zmieniają się cele i zakres aliansów. Integracja staje się głębsza i przyjmuje formę fuzji i przejęć. Obserwujemy budowę struktury kapitałowej. Widoczne jest ograniczenie konkurencji na rynku lotniczym wynikające z konsolidacji przewoźników wokół największych i najmocniejszych linii lotniczych. Wprowadzenie połączeń. Taką strategię przyjęły m.in. linie: mi innych aliansów. Teoria gier zastosowana BA, Lufthansa, KLM. Strategia przystępowa- do analizy współpracy linii lotniczych przez Kryzys finansowy, który ogarnął świat nia do aliansów, skupionych wokół najwięk- T. Busacker’a i J. P. Clark’a pokazała okolicz- w 2008 roku wpłynął także na branżę lot- szych linii lotniczych, była wybierana przez ności sprzyjające dobrej współpracy w ra- niczą. Przewoźnicy ponieśli ogromne straty. coraz większą liczbę przewoźników, zwłasz- mach aliansu: Nowe warunki funkcjonowania wymuszo- cza tych średnich i małych, dla których sta- • umowa zawarta pomiędzy członkami ne przez kryzys pokazują, że należy dokonać nowiła szansę utrzymania się na rynku. powinna mieć długotrwały charakter, co rewizji naszego podejścia do aliansów lotni- Do podejmowania współpracy
[Show full text]
Effects of Airlines Alliances and Mergers on Fair Competition and Monopoly Prevention
ATConf/6-WP/391 International Civil Aviation Organization 14/2/13 WORKING PAPER WORLDWIDE AIR TRANSPORT CONFERENCE (ATCONF) SIXTH MEETING Montréal, 18 to 22 March 2013 Agenda Item 1: Global overview of trends and developments Agenda Item 1.1: Industry and regulatory developments Agenda Item 2: Examination of key issues and related regulatory framework Agenda Item 2.4: Fair competition EFFECTS OF AIRLINES ALLIANCES AND MERGERS ON FAIR COMPETITION AND MONOPOLY PREVENTION (Presented by Egypt) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This paper addresses one of the developments that have taken place in the field of air transportation, and that relates to the emergence of strong alliances and mergers between airlines. It studies alliances and mergers implications on air transport, and suggests the development of frameworks for their regulation. Action: The Conference is invited to agree to the recommendations presented in paragraph 6. References: ATConf/6 reference material is available at www.icao.int/meetings/atconf6. 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Significant developments have occurred in the field of air transport. A large number of countries made remarkable progress in liberalizing international air transport regulations, and became involved in full market-access arrangements. At the same time, the airline industry underwent a major shift and saw the forging alliances and mergers between companies in order to consolidate their presence in a market environment characterized by strong competition. 1.2 Alliances between airlines have become a dominant feature in air transport, and a new global phenomenon unfolding relatively quickly through multiple collaborative business arrangements. Alliance agreements took different forms and included various elements of code-sharing, marketing and pricing cooperation, schedules coordination, and offices and airport facilities sharing.
[Show full text]
Airline Alliances
AIRLINE ALLIANCES by Paul Stephen Dempsey Director, Institute of Air & Space Law McGill University Copyright © 2011 by Paul Stephen Dempsey Open Skies • 1992 - the United States concluded the first second generation “open skies” agreement with the Netherlands. It allowed KLM and any other Dutch carrier to fly to any point in the United States, and allowed U.S. carriers to fly to any point in the Netherlands, a country about the size of West Virginia. The U.S. was ideologically wedded to open markets, so the imbalance in traffic rights was of no concern. Moreover, opening up the Netherlands would allow KLM to drain traffic from surrounding airline networks, which would eventually encourage the surrounding airlines to ask their governments to sign “open skies” bilateral with the United States. • 1993 - the U.S. conferred antitrust immunity on the Wings Alliance between Northwest Airlines and KLM. The encirclement policy began to corrode resistance to liberalization as the sixth freedom traffic drain began to grow; soon Lufthansa, then Air France, were asking their governments to sign liberal bilaterals. • 1996 - Germany fell, followed by the Czech Republic, Italy, Portugal, the Slovak Republic, Malta, Poland. • 2001- the United States had concluded bilateral open skies agreements with 52 nations and concluded its first multilateral open skies agreement with Brunei, Chile, New Zealand and Singapore. • 2002 – France fell. • 2007 - The U.S. and E.U. concluded a multilateral “open skies” traffic agreement that liberalized everything but foreign ownership and cabotage. • 2011 – cumulatively, the U.S. had signed “open skies” bilaterals with more than100 States. Multilateral and Bilateral Air Transport Agreements • Section 5 of the Transit Agreement, and Section 6 of the Transport Agreement, provide: “Each contracting State reserves the right to withhold or revoke a certificate or permit to an air transport enterprise of another State in any case where it is not satisfied that substantial ownership and effective control are vested in nationals of a contracting State .
[Show full text]