Strength in Diversity Highlights: Year Ended 30 June 2012
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
May CARG 2020.Pdf
ISSUE 30 – MAY 2020 ISSUE 30 – MAY ISSUE 29 – FEBRUARY 2020 Promoting positive mental health in teenagers and those who support them through the provision of mental health education, resilience strategies and early intervention What we offer Calm Harm is an Clear Fear is an app to Head Ed is a library stem4 offers mental stem4’s website is app to help young help children & young of mental health health conferences a comprehensive people manage the people manage the educational videos for students, parents, and clinically urge to self-harm symptoms of anxiety for use in schools education & health informed resource professionals www.stem4.org.uk Registered Charity No 1144506 Any individuals depicted in our images are models and used solely for illustrative purposes. We all know of young people, whether employees, family or friends, who are struggling in some way with mental health issues; at ARL, we are so very pleased to support the vital work of stem4: early intervention really can make a difference to young lives. Please help in any way that you can. ADVISER RANKINGS – CORPORATE ADVISERS RANKINGS GUIDE MAY 2020 | Q2 | ISSUE 30 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted The Corporate Advisers Rankings Guide is available to UK subscribers at £180 per in any form or by any means (including photocopying or recording) without the annum for four updated editions, including postage and packaging. A PDF version written permission of the copyright holder except in accordance with the provision is also available at £360 + VAT. of copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or under the terms of a licence issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency, Barnard’s Inn, 86 Fetter Lane, London, EC4A To appear in the Rankings Guide or for subscription details, please contact us 1EN. -
COVID-19 Proxy Governance Update
COVID-19 Proxy Governance Update 2020 AGM mid-season review FROM EQUINITI 01 Looking back and planning ahead It is incredible to note that it has been over 12 weeks since the official announcement on 23 March of the UK Government’s Stay at Home Measures, and nearly seven months since the severity of the pandemic became apparent in China. Over the said period, PLC boards, company secretaries and investor relations officers have kept their corporate calendars going thanks to rapid adoption of modified regulatory guidelines and inventive modes of engagement with investors. With annual general meetings being an obvious highlight in the corporate calendar, we take stock of the progress made so far over the 2020 AGM season, as well as using what we learned to plan ahead. Now that we are over the first ‘hump’ with the busy period of May AGMs out of the way, we are readying for the second ‘peak’ of June and July AGMs, and then an ‘easing’ until the second ‘mini’ season in the early autumn. As such, in this update, we look at: • 2020 AGM season statistics…so far • Proxy adviser engagement and ISS recommendations review • High-level assumptions for Q3 and Q4 • Relevant updates from the regulators, industry bodies and proxy advisers • Communications in the COVID-19 world – special commentary by leading financial PR firm,Camarco • How has COVID-19 impacted activism – special commentary by international law firm,White & Case 02 2020 AGM Season Statistics…so far Scope of data To assess progress and forecast what is to come, we look at the key statistics for the UK AGM season 2020 thus far. -
City-REDI Policy Briefing Series
City-REDI Policy Briefing Series March Image Image 2018 Part B Carillion’s Collapse: Consequences Dr Amir Qamar & Professor Simon Collinson Carillion, the second-largest construction firm in the UK, were proud of their commitment to support regional growth and small-scale suppliers. As part of this commitment they directed 60% of project expenditure to local economies. Following the collapse of the firm, this positive multiplier effect became a significant, negative multiplier effect, particularly damaging to small-scale suppliers in the construction industry. The aim of this policy brief is to examine the consequences of Carillion’s demise, many of which are only now surfacing. One of the fundamental lessons that we can learn from Carillion’s collapse is about these ‘contagion’ effects. As we saw in the 2008 financial crisis, the businesses that underpin the economic health of the country are connected and strongly co-dependent. When a large flagship firm falls it brings down others. This does not mean we need more state intervention. But it does mean we need more intelligent state intervention. One of the fundamental lessons that the Government can learn from the Carillion episode is that it has a significant responsibility as a key customer, using public sector funds for public sector projects, to monitor the health of firms and assess the risks prior to issuing PPI and other contracts. 1 Introduction The collapse of Carillion, the second-largest construction firm in the UK, has had a significant, negative knock-on effect, particularly on small-scale suppliers in the industry. In total, Carillion was comprised of 326 subsidiaries, of which 199 were in the UK. -
Disclaimer Strictly Not to Be Forwarded to Any
DISCLAIMER STRICTLY NOT TO BE FORWARDED TO ANY OTHER PERSONS IMPORTANT: You must read the following disclaimer before reading, accessing or making any other use of the attached document relating to SEGRO plc (the “Company”) dated 10 March 2017. In accessing the attached document, you agree to be bound by the following terms and conditions, including any modifications to them from time to time, each time you receive any information from us as a result of such access. You acknowledge that this electronic transmission and the delivery of the attached document is confidential and intended for you only and you agree you will not forward, reproduce, copy, download or publish this electronic transmission or the attached document (electronically or otherwise) to any other person. The attached document has been prepared solely in connection with the proposed rights issue and offering of nil paid rights, fully paid rights and new ordinary shares (the “Securities”) of the Company (the “Transaction”). The Prospectus has been published in connection with the admission of the Securities to the Official List of the UK Financial Conduct Authority (the ‘‘Financial Conduct Authority’’) and to trading on the London Stock Exchange plc’s main market for listed securities (together, ‘‘Admission’’). The Prospectus has been approved by the Financial Conduct Authority as a prospectus prepared in accordance with the Prospectus Rules made under section 73A of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000, as amended. NOTHING IN THIS ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION AND THE ATTACHED DOCUMENT CONSTITUTES AN OFFER OF SECURITIES FOR SALE IN ANY JURISDICTION WHERE IT IS UNLAWFUL TO DO SO. -
Fidelity® Low-Priced Stock K6 Fund
Quarterly Holdings Report for Fidelity® Low-Priced Stock K6 Fund April 30, 2021 LPSK6-QTLY-0621 1.9883997.103 Schedule of Investments April 30, 2021 (Unaudited) Showing Percentage of Net Assets Common Stocks – 91.1% Shares Value COMMUNICATION SERVICES – 1.6% Diversified Telecommunication Services – 0.0% Verizon Communications, Inc. 2,636 $ 152,334 Interactive Media & Services – 0.1% Dip Corp. 24,518 677,504 QuinStreet, Inc. (a) 25,997 526,959 XLMedia PLC (a) 268,040 190,641 ZIGExN Co. Ltd. 54,118 197,576 1,592,680 Media – 1.5% AMC Networks, Inc. Class A (a) (b) 33,496 1,684,179 Comcast Corp. Class A 130,298 7,316,233 Corus Entertainment, Inc. Class B (non‑vtg.) 49,446 236,539 Discovery Communications, Inc.: Class A (a) (b) 145,589 5,482,882 Class C (non‑vtg.) (a) 310,153 10,021,043 Gray Television, Inc. 28,620 581,558 Hyundai HCN 211,755 859,684 Intage Holdings, Inc. 244,992 2,992,628 Legs Co. Ltd. 1,400 29,325 MSG Network, Inc. Class A (a) 45,058 715,070 Nexstar Broadcasting Group, Inc. Class A 2,261 333,294 Nordic Entertainment Group AB (B Shares) 56 2,600 Pico Far East Holdings Ltd. 1,820,216 321,032 Proto Corp. 14,723 156,539 Reach PLC 503 1,528 RKB Mainichi Broadcasting Corp. 2,889 161,513 Saga Communications, Inc. Class A 35,206 793,191 Sky Network Television Ltd. (a) 1,984,879 241,465 TechTarget, Inc. (a) 12,227 937,811 Tegna, Inc. 85,733 1,719,804 The New York Times Co. -
Crr 412/2002
HSE Health & Safety Executive A survey of UK approaches to sharing good practice in health and safety risk management Prepared by Risk Solutions for the Health and Safety Executive CONTRACT RESEARCH REPORT 412/2002 HSE Health & Safety Executive A survey of UK approaches to sharing good practice in health and safety risk management E Baker Risk Solutions 1st floor, Central House 14 Upper Woburn Place London, WC1H 0JN United Kingdom The concept of good practice is central to HSE’s approach to regulation of health and safety management. There must therefore be a common understanding of what good practice is and where it can be found. A survey was conducted to explore how industry actually identifies good practice in health and safety management, decides how to adopt it, and how this is communicated with others. The findings are based primarily on a segmentation of the survey results by organisation size, due to homogeneity of the returns along other axes of analysis. A key finding is that there is no common understanding of the term good practice or how this is distinguished from best practice. Regulatory interpretation of good practice is perceived to be inconsistent. Three models were identified: A) Large organisations, primarily in privatised industries, have effective Trade Associations where good practice is developed and guidance disseminated industry-wide. B) Large and medium-sized organisations in competitive industries have ineffective trade associations. They develop good practices in-house and may only share these with their competitors when forced to do so. C) Small organisations have little contact with their competitors. -
AUTUMN2016 Your Employee Magazine
ANNOUNCING OUR WE JUST DON’T CLICK ADVANTAGE THROUGH RESULTS ANY MORE ALIGNMENT Delivering strong results through our Breaking up with the old intranet and Embedding our new approach to supply disciplined growth strategy: P06 getting ready for the new one: P14 chain engagement across the business: P16 AUTUMN2016 Your employee magazine P10 RUNNING REGENERATION Getting to know Stephen Teagle P12 groWing Stronger Tom Nicholson and Andrew Hammond give their views on Linden Homes’ plans and progress WIN Turn to p23 £50 for our competition News | Summer 2016 Evolve is produced on a quarterly basis by the Group Marketing & Communications team. Your input into Evolve is what makes it a success. Keep CONTENTS sending us your stories and telling us what you would like to see featured, as well as what you like about the News magazine, and what we can improve. 04 COMPANY AND PROJECT NEWS Major contract wins and project highlights Melanie Bright 08 APPOINTMENTS & PROMOTIONS Group Marketing & Communications Director Key management moves across the Group 09 QUESTIONS WITH THE PM Keith Lilley tells us all about the new Birmingham Babita Pawar Communications Manager and Conservatoire editor of Evolve 10 RUNNING REGENERATION Getting to know Stephen Teagle Gavin Crumlin 4 Digital Communications Manager Inside our business Jesus Guedez Graphic Designer and creative lead on Evolve 12 GROWING STRONGER Tom Nicholson and Andrew Hammond outline Linden Homes’ plans and progress Ben Kunicki PR Manager for Building, 14 WE JUST DON’T CLICK ANY MORE Partnerships, AH&R and FM The key features of our new intranet 16 ADVANTAGE THROUGH ALIGNMENT Katrina McNicol PR Manager for Scotland & 14 Our new supply chain initiative enjoys early success Investments Paul Kirkwood PR Manager for Infrastructure People in England 19 EMPLOYEE , COMMUNITY AND CHARITY Evolve’s commitment Evolve is printed on paper which complies with HIGHLIGHTS internationally recognised forestry management Your success stories, community activities and standards. -
View Annual Report
GROWTH THROUGH INNOVATION Halma plc Annual Report and Accounts 2012 Overview 01 Investment Proposition 02 Group at a Glance 04 Strategy and Business Model 06 Innovation in Healthcare and Analysis 08 Innovation in Infrastructure Sensors 10 Innovation in Industrial Safety Business review 12 Chairman’s Statement 14 Performance against Strategy 20 Strategic Review 25 Strategy in Action 30 Sector Reviews 30 Health and Analysis 38 Infrastructure Sensors 46 Industrial Safety 54 Financial Review 59 Risk Management and Internal Control 61 Principal Risks and Uncertainties 64 Corporate Responsibility Governance 68 Board of Directors and Executive Board 71 Chairman’s Introduction to Governance 72 Corporate Governance 76 Audit Committee Report 78 Nomination Committee Report 79 Remuneration Committee Report 80 Remuneration Report 87 Other Statutory Information 90 Directors’ Responsibilities Financial statements 91 Independent Auditor’s Report – Group 92 Consolidated Income Statement 92 Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income and Expenditure 93 Consolidated Balance Sheet 94 Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity 95 Consolidated Cash Flow Statement 96 Accounting Policies 102 Notes to the Accounts 135 Independent Auditor’s Report – Company 136 Company Balance Sheet 137 Notes to the Company Accounts 142 Summary 2003 to 2012 144 Halma Directory 148 Shareholder Information and Advisers Overview Business review Governance Financial statements INVESTMENT PROS PO ITION Halma has an impressive record of creating sustained shareholder value through the economic cycle. We have consistently delivered record profits, high returns, strong cash flows, low levels of balance sheet gearing and have a 30+ year track record of growing dividend payments by 5% or more every year. Our ability to achieve record profits through the recent periods of economic turbulence is derived from our strategy of having a group of businesses building strong competitive advantage in specialised safety, health and environmental technology markets with resilient growth drivers. -
Annual Report 2007 Download PDF 504.15 KB
Delivering profitable growth Annual Report and Financial Statements 2007 CONTENTS PERFORMANCE “Galliford Try has had an excellent year. We have delivered significant profit growth across all our businesses, Highlights 01 our recent acquisitions are performing The Group 02 ahead of expectations, and we are Chairman’s Statement 03 confident that our strategy will continue Business Review 04 to deliver sustainable growth and Divisional Reviews 06 increased shareholder value.” Financial Results 11 Corporate Responsibility 14 Greg Fitzgerald Corporate and Social Responsibility Report 16 Chief Executive DIRECTORS AND GOVERNANCE Directors and Executive Board 20 Directors’ Report 22 Corporate Governance Report 24 Remuneration Report 28 FINANCIALS Independent Auditors’ Report – Group 34 Consolidated Income Statement 35 Consolidated Statement of Recognised Income and Expense 36 Consolidated Balance Sheet 37 Consolidated Cash Flow Statement 38 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 39 Independent Auditors’ Report – Company 72 Company Balance Sheet 73 Notes to the Company Financial Statements 74 Five-Year Record 82 Contacts 83 Shareholder Information 84 HIGHLIGHTS For the year ended 30 June 2007 • Results ahead of expectations from Morrison Construction and REVENUE Chartdale Homes in the first full year following acquisition. +65% • Good performance from Linden Homes since acquisition; integration going well with synergies exceeding forecast. • Year end net debt of £99 million, representing gearing of 32 per cent, £1,410 m significantly better than expectations. • Current construction order book maintained at £2.1 billion. PROFIT BEFORE TAX • Record housebuilding completions of 1,526 units and landbank +75% of 11,200 plots. Encouraging sales during the summer period with current sales in hand of £323 million. -
2019 Annual Report and Preliminary Announcement Holdings Limited
gleeson MJ GLEESON PLC ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS2019 BUILDING HOMES CHANGING LIVES MJ GLEESON PLC ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2019 INTRODUCTION MJ Gleeson plc specialises in low-cost house building and strategic land promotion. MacDonald Park, Farnworth, Greater Manchester StrATEGIC REPort GoVErnANCE FINAnciAL STATEMEnts OTHER InforMAtion CONTENTS Strategic Report Financial Statements Financial Highlights 1 Statement of Directors’ Responsibilities 72 What We Do 2 Independent Auditors’ Report 73 How We Operate 4 Consolidated Income Statement 78 Chairman’s Statement 6 Statement of Financial Position 79 Market Overview 8 Statement of Changes in Equity 80 Chief Executive’s Statement 10 Statement of Cash Flows 82 Business Model 14 Notes to the Financial Statements 83 Strategy 16 Business Review 18 Other Information Corporate Social Responsibility 22 Five Year Review 103 Non-financial Reporting 26 Further Information 104 Financial Review 28 Corporate Directory 104 Risk Management 32 Shareholder Information 104 Financial Calendar 104 Governance Our Website 104 Board of Directors 36 Chairman’s Introduction 38 Governance Report 39 Directors’ Report 44 Audit Committee Report 48 Remuneration Committee Report 54 Remuneration Policy Report 56 Annual Report on Remuneration 64 FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS REVENUE CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS +27.0 % £30.3m 2019: £249.9m, 2018: £196.7m 2018: £41.3m PROFIT BEFORE TAX DIVIDEND FOR THE YEAR +11.4% +7. 8 % 2019: £41.2m, 2018: £37.0m 2019: 34.5p, 2018: 32.0p EARNINGS PER SHARE RETURN ON CAPITAL EMPLOYED +9.7% 25.9% 2019: 61.0p, 2018: 55.6p 2018: 26.6% Cover: Ammie and Harper, Woodthorpe Park, Chesterfield, Derbyshire MJ Gleeson PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2019 1 WHAT WE DO BUILDING HOMES CHANGING LIVES We employ people with outstanding skills which we bring together to build new homes and communities for the benefit of our customers, our shareholders and society at large. -
Annual Report 2016
ANNUAL REPORT 2016 Freshfi eld Lane Danehill Haywards Heath Sussex RH17 7HH Tel: 0844 931 0022 www.mbhplc.co.uk Britain's Brick Specialists HIGHLIGHTS – At a glance 2016 Turnover £30.1 m +3% Profit before tax £4.6 m – Sales volumes 69.4 m +4% Net cash £4.7 m +61% NAV 65.8 p +9% Dividend 2.0 p +100% Perivan Financial Print 244144 244144 Michelmersh pp001-pp015 17/03/2017 14:34 Page 1 Contents page Chairman’s Statement 2 Chief Executives’ Review 4 Officers and Professional Advisers 6 Directors’ Biographies 7 Directors’ Report 8 Directors’ Remuneration Report 11 Strategic Report 13 Independent Auditors’ Report to the Members 15 Consolidated Income Statement 16 Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income 17 Consolidated Balance Sheet 18 Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity 19 Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows 20 General Information and Accounting Policies 21 Notes t o Financial Statements 26 Parent Company Financial Statements 41 Independent Auditors’ Report to the Members 42 Company Balance Sheet 43 Statement of Cash Flows 44 Statement of Changes in Equity 45 Accounting Policies 46 Notes to Company Financial Statements 48 Notice of Annual General Meeting 54 Michelmersh Brick Holdings Plc Annual Report 2016 1 244144 Michelmersh pp001-pp015 17/03/2017 14:34 Page 2 Chairman’s Statement I am very pleased to report that the Company delivered another strong performance in 2016, which culminated in matching 2015’s levels of profit before ta x. What is more pleasing is that this was achieved despite some challenging operational issues , notably at the Michelmersh plant as reported at the half year . -
Monitoring the London Plan Energy Policies Phase 3
Monitoring the London Plan Energy Policies Phase 3 Part 1 report FINAL December 2009 Prepared for: By: Greater London Authority Prof Tony Day, Princess Ogumka & City Hall Phil Jones The Queen’s Walk London South Bank University London SE1 2AA 103 Borough Road Tel 020 7983 4592 London SE1 0AA Tel: 020 7815 7656 E-mail: [email protected] Part 1 report FINAL Contents CONTENTS.................................................................................................................................2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.......................................................................................................3 1. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................8 2. RESULTS ......................................................................................................................... 10 2.1. Emissions.................................................................................................................................. 11 2.2. Savings..................................................................................................................................... 12 2.3. Analysis of Energy Efficiency contributions............................................................................... 17 2.4. Analysis of contributions from CHP with communal heating .................................................... 19 2.4.1. Contribution by CHP type........................................................................................................