DOCSLIB.ORG

EOU Book of Abstracts 2013 08 06

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

EOU2013UK PROGRAMME & ABSTRACTS NORWICH 27—31 AUGUST 2013 University of East Anglia 9th Conference of the European Ornithologists’ Union wwww.norwich.eounion.org hosted by the University of East Anglia supported by British Ornithologists’ Union British Trust for Ornithology Edward Grey Institute RSPB EOU2013UK — Local Organisers EOU2013UK is organised and sponsored by some of the UK’s leading ornithological organisations, research institutes and bird conservation bodies. British Ornithologists’ Union www.bou.org.uk The BOU is a worldwide society publishing the world’s leading ornithilogical journal, IBIS. The BOU supports students studying ornithology including their attendance at conferences, including this first EOU meeting in the UK. The BOU also runs a Career Development Bursary scheme for early career reasearchers and awards Small Ornithological Research Grants annually to projects around the world. British Trust for Ornithology www.bto.org The BTO is a scientific research organisation specialising in birds and their habitats. We undertake impartial research and analysis to advance the understanding of natural systems. The BTO provides high quality, impartial and policy-relevant data and information, relied upon for informed decision making. We work in partnership with the academic and conservation science communities, Government, and the private and voluntary sectors. Edward Grey Institute of Field Ornithology www.zoo.ox.ac.uk/egi The Edward Grey Institute of Field Ornithology (EGI) is part of the Department of Zoology of the University of Oxford. Founded in 1937, it researches the behaviour, ecology, evolution and conservation of birds, emphasizing the need to understand organisms in their natural environments. The EGI is well known for its groundbreaking population studies of birds, and was a founding supporter of EOU. RSPB www.rspb.org.uk The RSPB speaks out for birds and wildlife, tackling the problems that threaten our environment. We are the largest wildlife conservation organisation in Europe, with over a million members. We work to secure the conservation of wildlife through research, education, habitat management and advocacy. We are part of BirdLife International University of East Anglia www.uea.ac.uk The University of East Anglia (UEA) is an internationally renowned university that provides top quality academic, social and cultural facilities to over 14,000 students. It is a leading member of the Norwich Research Park, one of Europe’s biggest concentrations of researchers in environmental science, and the campus is located on 362 acres of parkland and woodland. 9th Conference of the European Ornithologists’ Union PROGRAMME & ABSTRACTS Edited by Steve Dudley, Jenny Gill, Aldina Franco, Nathalie Gilbert, Danielle Peruffo, Alice Risely, Amy Romans & Lewis Spurgin European Ornithologists’ Union Norwich, UK PROGRAMME & ABSTRACTS Editing & Preparation: Steve Dudley, Jenny Gill, Aldina Franco, Nathalie Gilbert, Danielle Peruffo, Alice Risely, Amy Romans & Lewis Spurgin Design & Layout: Steve Dudley, BOU Image credits Front cover, from top downwards: Eurasian Bittern © Andy Hay (rspb-images.com) Red Knot © Andy Hay (rspb-images.com) Corncrake being released in Cambridgeshire © Andy Hay (rspb-images.com) Woodland bird surveyor © Andy Hay (rspb-images.com) Corn Bunting © Andy Hay (rspb-images.com) Title page, from top downwards: Bearded Tit © Mike Richards (rspb-images.com) Researchers © Andy Hay (rspb-images.com) Red Knot © Andy Hay (rspb-images.com) Stone-curlew © Chris Gomersall (rspb-images.com) WEBSITES EOU conference website: Rafal Bajaczyk EOU bookings pages (hosted by BOU): Angela Langford & Steve Dudley, BOU © European Ornithologists’ Union, 2013 EOU2013UK 9th Conference of the European Ornithologists’ Union CONFERENCE ORGANISERS British Ornithologists’ Union British Trust for Ornithology Edward Grey Institute of Field Ornithology RSPB University of East Anglia LOCAL ORGANISING COMMITTEE Rob Fuller | BTO | Chairman Steve Dudley | BOU David Gibbons | RSPB Jenny Gill | UEA Andy Gosler | EGI Nicki Read | BTO Supported by Angela Langford | BOU SCIENTIFIC PROGRAMME COMMITTEE Nikita Chernetsov | Biological Station Rybachy, Russia | Chairman Christiaan Both | University of Groningen, the Netherlands Timothy Coppack | Institute for Applied Ecology, Broderstorf, Germany Götz Eichhorn | Institut Pluridisciplinaire Hubert Curien, Strasbourg, France Barbara Helm | Max-Planck-Institute for Ornithology, Radolfzell, Germany Alfonso Marzal | University of Extremadura, Spain Graham Martin | University of Birmingham, UK Stoyan C. Nikolov | Central Laboratory of General Ecology, Sofia, Bulgaria Tomasz Wesolowski | Wroclaw University, Poland The organisers would like to thank all those who helped prepare the programme and organise the conference. In particular, we would like to thank Angela Langford (BOU) and the University of East Anglia volunteers, José Alves, Tom Finch, Nathalie Gilbert, Danielle Gilroy, Karen Hornigold, Becky Laidlaw, Danielle Peruffo, Alice Risely, Amy Romans, Philip Saunders, Lewis Spurgin, Martin Sullivan and Leila Walker. CONTENTS Welcome 1 Programme 2 27 August 2 28 August 2 29 August 8 30 August 14 31 August 14 Abstracts – plenary 18 Abstracts – symposia, contributed orals and posters 24 Venue map 265 EOU2013UK – the 9th Conference of the European Ornithologists’ Union Welcome to the EOU’s 2013 conference Ornithologists are generally fascinated by their study objects; they love to study birds. Therefore, despite recent economical downturns and hardships, funding cuts, and other obstacles affecting many people in Europe, ornithologists manage to do fairly well. This is clearly demonstrated by a large number of attending delegates, coming from every corner of Europe and beyond, as well as by a diverse set of scientific presentations. Like their highly mobile study subjects, many ornithologists have recently become wanderers, often having worked in several different countries by the mid-point of their careers, producing great benefits in terms of the cross-fertilization of ideas and practices. The second visible and very positive current tendency is a growing number of international teams carrying out continent-wide collaborative studies. The promotion of such interactions in Europe is the role of the EOU and conferences are the most important means by which it achieves its objectives. This abstract book, containing a rich and varied set of talks and posters, shows that the Norwich conference will certainly fulfil that purpose. For that we have to thank not only the speakers and the authors of the posters, but the symposium organisers and the Scientific Programme Committee (under the chairmanship of Nikita Chernetsov), who have solicited contributions from all over Europe and drawn them together into an exciting programme. The EOU, without staff and almost without financial resources, depends on the voluntary efforts of many people. Conferences depend on the hard work of the organising team in the host country and our UK hosts have done us proud. They have provided excellent arrangements. This will allow us to get the most out of both the programme and the informal part of the conference – discussions and making new contacts are such an important part of our meetings. A significant part of the organisation of this conference has been to provide modest financial support for young ornithologists and for those from lower income countries, to help them to participate in the meeting. In addition to the contribution from the EOU, the British Ornithologists' Union has funded the attendance of 45 student and early-career researchers and the BOU and Swarovski are sponsoring prizes for the best student oral and poster presentations. Continuity and communication between conferences depends on the EOU’s Council. A new team of officers and Council members is to be elected at the General Meeting on Thursday, to which all conference participants are invited. Please give the EOU and their officers your support, share with them ideas about how the work of the Union may be developed, so that European ornithology continues to flourish and to grow in strength and effectiveness. Welcome to Norwich and to EOU 2013! Enjoy the conference! Tomasz Wesołowski EOU President 1 EOU2013UK – the 9th Conference of the European Ornithologists’ Union PROGRAMME TUESDAY, 27 August 2013 1400 EOU Council Meeting Council House 1700 Registration opens The Hive, Union House 1900 OPENING RECEPTION and buffet The Hive, Union House 2030 PLENARY LECTURE Lecture Theatre 1 Tim Birkhead Ten Thousand Birds: Ornithology since Darwin 2030 Exhibition Hall closes WEDNESDAY, 28 August 2013 0700 onwards Breakfast – sitting 1 The Zest restaurant 0745 onwards Breakfast – sitting 2 The Zest restaurant 0840 OPENING CEREMONY Lecture Theatre 1 0900 PLENARY LECTURE Lecture Theatre 1 Leo Fusani The evolutionary and physiological mechanisms of elaBorate courtship displays 0950 Coffee break The Hive and ExhiBition Hall, Union House A chance to view posters and exhiBitor stands 2 EOU2013UK – the 9th Conference of the European Ornithologists’ Union 1030 – 1230 SYMPOSIA – PARALLEL SESSIONS (X4) Symposium 1 Lecture Theatre 1 Adapting bird conservation to climate change: where models meet reality Conveners: Malcolm Ausden & James Pearce-Higgins 1030 Hartley, A. The reliaBility of climate change projections for assessing the impact of climate change on biodiversity 1100 Ausden, M., Ockendon, N., Beale, C., Carroll, M., Dodd, A., Johnston, A., Oliver T. & Pearce-Higgins,
Recommended publications
  • Beyond Fish Edna Metabarcoding: Field Replicates Disproportionately Improve the Detection of Stream Associated Vertebrate Specie

    Beyond Fish Edna Metabarcoding: Field Replicates Disproportionately Improve the Detection of Stream Associated Vertebrate Specie

    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.26.437227; this version posted March 26, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC 4.0 International license. 1 2 3 Beyond fish eDNA metabarcoding: Field replicates 4 disproportionately improve the detection of stream 5 associated vertebrate species 6 7 8 9 Till-Hendrik Macher1, Robin Schütz1, Jens Arle2, Arne J. Beermann1,3, Jan 10 Koschorreck2, Florian Leese1,3 11 12 13 1 University of Duisburg-Essen, Aquatic Ecosystem Research, Universitätsstr. 5, 45141 Essen, 14 Germany 15 2German Environmental Agency, Wörlitzer Platz 1, 06844 Dessau-Roßlau, Germany 16 3University of Duisburg-Essen, Centre for Water and Environmental Research (ZWU), Universitätsstr. 17 3, 45141 Essen, Germany 18 19 20 21 22 Keywords: birds, biomonitoring, bycatch, conservation, environmental DNA, mammals 23 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.26.437227; this version posted March 26, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC 4.0 International license. 24 Abstract 25 Fast, reliable, and comprehensive biodiversity monitoring data are needed for 26 environmental decision making and management. Recent work on fish environmental 27 DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding shows that aquatic diversity can be captured fast, reliably, 28 and non-invasively at moderate costs.
  • Identification of Pine Bunting T

    Identification of Pine Bunting T

    Identification of Pine Bunting Daniele Occhiato he nominate subspecies of Pine Bunting tion between the two species in areas of sym- T Emberiza leucocephalos leucocephalos breeds patry on their Siberian breeding grounds. First- in a large part of Siberia from the western slopes generation hybrids, especially males, are gene- of the Ural (55° E) east to the Pacific, including rally distinctive and do not lead to confusion. Sakhalin and the Kuril Islands (c 155° E). It However, such hybrids are fertile, and back- ranges north to the Arctic Circle (66° N) and crosses with members of one or the other spe- south to northern Mongolia (50° N); a disjunct cies, or with other hybrids, lead to individuals in population breeds further south in the Altai, which evidence of hybridization is even more Tarbagatay, Ala Tau and Tien Shan mountain diluted, and often very difficult to detect in the ranges (45° N). A geographically isolated and field. In some cases, only careful in-hand exami- apparently sedentary subspecies, E l fronto, nation can reveal such hybrid characters. For breeds in northern Qinghai and Gansu prov- example, a study by Eugeny Panov (in Bradshaw inces, China (Cramp & Perrins 1994, Byers et al & Gray 1993) revealed that out of 239 adult 1995). The migratory nominate subspecies win- male Pine Bunting x Yellowhammer hybrids ters mostly in Afghanistan, Pakistan, north-west- studied in the hand in western Siberia, as many ern India, Nepal and northern China; less impor- as 58 were only identifiable as such by the yel- tant wintering areas include northern Iran, the low lesser underwing-coverts.
  • Beyond Fish Edna Metabarcoding: Field Replicates Disproportionately Improve the Detection of Stream Associated Vertebrate Species

    Beyond Fish Edna Metabarcoding: Field Replicates Disproportionately Improve the Detection of Stream Associated Vertebrate Species

    Metabarcoding and Metagenomics 5: 59–71 DOI 10.3897/mbmg.5.66557 Research Article Beyond fish eDNA metabarcoding: Field replicates disproportionately improve the detection of stream associated vertebrate species Till-Hendrik Macher1, Robin Schütz1, Jens Arle2, Arne J. Beermann1,3, Jan Koschorreck2, Florian Leese1,3 1 University of Duisburg-Essen, Aquatic Ecosystem Research, Universitätsstr. 5, 45141 Essen, Germany 2 German Environment Agency, Wörlitzer Platz 1, 06844 Dessau-Roßlau, Germany 3 University of Duisburg-Essen, Centre for Water and Environmental Research (ZWU), Universitätsstr. 3, 45141 Essen, Germany Corresponding author: Till-Hendrik Macher ([email protected]) Academic editor: Pieter Boets | Received 26 March 2021 | Accepted 10 June 2021 | Published 13 July 2021 Abstract Fast, reliable, and comprehensive biodiversity monitoring data are needed for environmental decision making and management. Recent work on fish environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding shows that aquatic diversity can be captured fast, reliably, and non-invasively at moderate costs. Because water in a catchment flows to the lowest point in the landscape, often a stream, it can col- lect traces of terrestrial species via surface or subsurface runoff along its way or when specimens come into direct contact with water (e.g., when drinking). Thus, fish eDNA metabarcoding data can provide information on fish but also on other vertebrate species that live in riparian habitats. This additional data may offer a much more comprehensive approach for assessing vertebrate diversity at no additional costs. Studies on how the sampling strategy affects species detection especially of stream-associated communities, however, are scarce. We therefore performed an analysis on the effects of biological replication on both fish as well as (semi-)terrestrial species detection.
  • Phylogeny and Classification of the Old World Emberizini

    Phylogeny and Classification of the Old World Emberizini

    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 47 (2008) 960–973 www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev Phylogeny and classification of the Old World Emberizini (Aves, Passeriformes) Per Alstro¨m a,b,*,1, Urban Olsson c,1, Fumin Lei d, Hai-tao Wang d,e, Wei Gao e, Per Sundberg c a Department of Vertebrate Zoology and Molecular Systematics Laboratory, Swedish Museum of Natural History, P.O. Box 50007, SE-104 05 Stockholm, Sweden b Department of Systematic Zoology, Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, Norbyva¨gen 18 D, SE-752 36 Uppsala, Sweden c Department of Zoology, Go¨teborg University, Box 463, SE-405 30 Go¨teborg, Sweden d Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Datunlu B5, Changyang District, Beijing 100101, China e School of Life Sciences, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China Received 3 July 2007; revised 1 December 2007; accepted 11 December 2007 Available online 14 April 2008 Abstract The phylogeny of the avian genus Emberiza and the monotypic genera Latoucheornis, Melophus and Miliaria (collectively the Old World Emberizini), as well as representatives for the New World Emberizini, the circumpolar genera Calcarius and Plectrophenax and the four other generally recognized tribes in the subfamily Emberizinae was estimated based on the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene and introns 6–7 of the nuclear ornithine decarboxylase (ODC) gene. Our results support monophyly of the Old World Emberizini, but do not corroborate a sister relationship to the New World Emberizini. Calcarius and Plectrophenax form a clade separated from the other Emberizini. This agrees with previous studies, and we recommend the use of the name Calcariini.
  • European Red List of Birds

    European Red List of Birds

    European Red List of Birds Compiled by BirdLife International Published by the European Commission. opinion whatsoever on the part of the European Commission or BirdLife International concerning the legal status of any country, Citation: Publications of the European Communities. Design and layout by: Imre Sebestyén jr. / UNITgraphics.com Printed by: Pannónia Nyomda Picture credits on cover page: Fratercula arctica to continue into the future. © Ondrej Pelánek All photographs used in this publication remain the property of the original copyright holder (see individual captions for details). Photographs should not be reproduced or used in other contexts without written permission from the copyright holder. Available from: to your questions about the European Union Freephone number (*): 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (*) Certain mobile telephone operators do not allow access to 00 800 numbers or these calls may be billed Published by the European Commission. A great deal of additional information on the European Union is available on the Internet. It can be accessed through the Europa server (http://europa.eu). Cataloguing data can be found at the end of this publication. ISBN: 978-92-79-47450-7 DOI: 10.2779/975810 © European Union, 2015 Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission of the copyright holder. Printed in Hungary. European Red List of Birds Consortium iii Table of contents Acknowledgements ...................................................................................................................................................1 Executive summary ...................................................................................................................................................5 1.
  • Biodiversity Profile of Afghanistan

    Biodiversity Profile of Afghanistan

    NEPA Biodiversity Profile of Afghanistan An Output of the National Capacity Needs Self-Assessment for Global Environment Management (NCSA) for Afghanistan June 2008 United Nations Environment Programme Post-Conflict and Disaster Management Branch First published in Kabul in 2008 by the United Nations Environment Programme. Copyright © 2008, United Nations Environment Programme. This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgement of the source is made. UNEP would appreciate receiving a copy of any publication that uses this publication as a source. No use of this publication may be made for resale or for any other commercial purpose whatsoever without prior permission in writing from the United Nations Environment Programme. United Nations Environment Programme Darulaman Kabul, Afghanistan Tel: +93 (0)799 382 571 E-mail: [email protected] Web: http://www.unep.org DISCLAIMER The contents of this volume do not necessarily reflect the views of UNEP, or contributory organizations. The designations employed and the presentations do not imply the expressions of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNEP or contributory organizations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or its authority, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Unless otherwise credited, all the photos in this publication have been taken by the UNEP staff. Design and Layout: Rachel Dolores
  • 1 SOUTH KOREA 22 October – 3 November, 2018

    1 SOUTH KOREA 22 October – 3 November, 2018

    SOUTH KOREA 22 October – 3 November, 2018 Sandy Darling, Jeni Darling, Tom Thomas Most tours to South Korea occur in May for the spring migration or in late fall or winter for northern birds that winter in South Korea. This trip was timed in late October and early November to try see both summer residents and winter arrivals, and was successful in doing so. Birds were much shyer than in North America and often were visible only briefly, so that, for example, we saw few thrushes although they could be heard. This report has been written by Sandy and includes photos from both Tom (TT) and Sandy (SD). Sandy saw 166 species adequately of which 57 were life birds. When one includes birds heard, seen by the leader or others, or not seen well enough to count (BVD), the total was about 184. From trip reports it was clear that the person to lead the tour was Dr Nial Moores, Director of Birds Korea, an NGO working to improve the environment, especially for birds, in Korea. Nial has twenty years of experience in Korea, knows where birds are, and has ears and eyes that are exceptional. He planned the trip, made all the arrangements, found birds that we would not have found on our own and was our interface with Koreans, few of whom speak English. Nial also had to rejig the itinerary when strong winds led to the cancellation of a ferry to Baekryeong Island. We drove the vehicles - confidence was needed in dealing with city traffic, which was as aggressive as other trip reports said! Some of the highlights of the trip were: About 40,000 massed shore birds on Yubu Island, including the rare Spoonbill Sandpiper, a life bird for Tom.
  • Quantitative Investigations on Bird Communities in Different Habitats in the Orkhon-Selenge-Valley in Northern Mongolia

    Quantitative Investigations on Bird Communities in Different Habitats in the Orkhon-Selenge-Valley in Northern Mongolia

    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Erforschung biologischer Ressourcen der Mongolei Institut für Biologie der Martin-Luther-Universität / Exploration into the Biological Resources of Halle-Wittenberg Mongolia, ISSN 0440-1298 2005 Quantitative Investigations on Bird Communities in Different Habitats in the Orkhon-Selenge-Valley in Northern Mongolia Tobias Stenzel Martin-Luther-Universität, [email protected] Michael Stubbe Martin-Luther-Universität, [email protected] R. Samjaa National University of Mongolia, [email protected] S. Gombobaatar National University of Mongolia Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/biolmongol Part of the Asian Studies Commons, Biodiversity Commons, Desert Ecology Commons, Environmental Sciences Commons, Nature and Society Relations Commons, Ornithology Commons, Other Animal Sciences Commons, Other Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons, Population Biology Commons, and the Zoology Commons Stenzel, Tobias; Stubbe, Michael; Samjaa, R.; and Gombobaatar, S., "Quantitative Investigations on Bird Communities in Different Habitats in the Orkhon-Selenge-Valley in Northern Mongolia" (2005). Erforschung biologischer Ressourcen der Mongolei / Exploration into the Biological Resources of Mongolia, ISSN 0440-1298. 127. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/biolmongol/127 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Institut für Biologie der Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Erforschung biologischer Ressourcen der Mongolei / Exploration into the Biological Resources of Mongolia, ISSN 0440-1298 by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. In: Proceedings of the symposium ”Ecosystem Research in the Arid Environments of Central Asia: Results, Challenges, and Perspectives,” Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia, June 23-24, 2004.
  • EUROPEAN BIRDS of CONSERVATION CONCERN Populations, Trends and National Responsibilities

    EUROPEAN BIRDS of CONSERVATION CONCERN Populations, Trends and National Responsibilities

    EUROPEAN BIRDS OF CONSERVATION CONCERN Populations, trends and national responsibilities COMPILED BY ANNA STANEVA AND IAN BURFIELD WITH SPONSORSHIP FROM CONTENTS Introduction 4 86 ITALY References 9 89 KOSOVO ALBANIA 10 92 LATVIA ANDORRA 14 95 LIECHTENSTEIN ARMENIA 16 97 LITHUANIA AUSTRIA 19 100 LUXEMBOURG AZERBAIJAN 22 102 MACEDONIA BELARUS 26 105 MALTA BELGIUM 29 107 MOLDOVA BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA 32 110 MONTENEGRO BULGARIA 35 113 NETHERLANDS CROATIA 39 116 NORWAY CYPRUS 42 119 POLAND CZECH REPUBLIC 45 122 PORTUGAL DENMARK 48 125 ROMANIA ESTONIA 51 128 RUSSIA BirdLife Europe and Central Asia is a partnership of 48 national conservation organisations and a leader in bird conservation. Our unique local to global FAROE ISLANDS DENMARK 54 132 SERBIA approach enables us to deliver high impact and long term conservation for the beneit of nature and people. BirdLife Europe and Central Asia is one of FINLAND 56 135 SLOVAKIA the six regional secretariats that compose BirdLife International. Based in Brus- sels, it supports the European and Central Asian Partnership and is present FRANCE 60 138 SLOVENIA in 47 countries including all EU Member States. With more than 4,100 staf in Europe, two million members and tens of thousands of skilled volunteers, GEORGIA 64 141 SPAIN BirdLife Europe and Central Asia, together with its national partners, owns or manages more than 6,000 nature sites totaling 320,000 hectares. GERMANY 67 145 SWEDEN GIBRALTAR UNITED KINGDOM 71 148 SWITZERLAND GREECE 72 151 TURKEY GREENLAND DENMARK 76 155 UKRAINE HUNGARY 78 159 UNITED KINGDOM ICELAND 81 162 European population sizes and trends STICHTING BIRDLIFE EUROPE GRATEFULLY ACKNOWLEDGES FINANCIAL SUPPORT FROM THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION.
  • Chaffinch Fringilla Coelebs, Brambling F. Montifringilla, and Yellowhammer Emberiza Citrinella in Himachal Pradesh, India

    Chaffinch Fringilla Coelebs, Brambling F. Montifringilla, and Yellowhammer Emberiza Citrinella in Himachal Pradesh, India

    156 Indian BIRDS VOL. 8 NO. 6 (PUBL. 15 OCTOBER 2013) Chaffinch Fringilla coelebs, Brambling 180. Birds were seen in an area of terraced fields on F. montifringilla, and Yellowhammer gentle slopes, with a thin cover of trees. Emberiza citrinella in Himachal Pradesh, India Manoj Sharma, C. Abhinav & Devinder Singh Dhadwal Sharma, M., Abhinav, C., & Dhadwal, D. S., 2013. Chaffinch Fringilla coelebs, Brambling F. montifringilla, and Yellowhammer Emberiza citrinella in Himachal Pradesh, India. Indian BIRDS 8 (6): 156–157. Manoj Sharma, Village Shankarpur, Ramnagar, District Nainital 244715, Uttrakhand, India. Email: [email protected] [MS] C. Abhinav, Village & P.O. Ghurkari, Kangra 176001, Himanchal Pradesh, India. Email: [email protected] [CA] Devinder Singh Dhadwal, ACF, H. P. Forest Dept., Wildlife Circle, Dharamshala 176215, Himanchal Pradesh, India. Email: [email protected][DSD] uring the winter of 2011–2012 the areas above and, ‘in some years common in Baluchistan,’ (Roberts 1992). Dharamshala (Himachal Pradesh, India) saw frequent It is recorded from Nepal on a few occasions (Inskipp & Inskipp Dsnowfall, and on 7 January 2012 there was very heavy 1985), and is a vagrant to Bhutan (Bishop 1999; Spirenburg snowfall in the upper regions of Ilaka, Ghallu, and Dharamkot, 2005). The species was first recorded from India in December with light snowfall at elevations as low as c. 400–500 m asl 1982 at Corbett National Park (Madge 1985). There are several around Dharamshala. Unusual bird activity was observed during records of the species thereafter, mostly from the Himalayas January and February 2012 at Upper Barol (32°20’N, 76°33’E; c.
  • The First Record of Pine Bunting (Emberiza Leucocephalos) in British Columbia and Canada

    The First Record of Pine Bunting (Emberiza Leucocephalos) in British Columbia and Canada

    The First Record of Pine Bunting (Emberiza leucocephalos) in British Columbia and Canada. By Rick Toochin. Submitted: April 15, 2019. Introduction and Distribution The Pine Bunting (Emberiza leucocephalos) is a small passerine found breeding mainly in the open woodland and forest edge of Siberia (Brazil 2009). The widespread nominate subspecies (Emberiza leucocephalos leucocephalos) is found breeding from the eastern Ural Mountains (55° E), eastward to Magadan and Amur Estuary, Sakhalin and Kuril Islands, and northeastern China. It ranges north to the Arctic Circle (66° N) and south to northern Mongolia (50°N)(Occhiato 2003, Brazil 2009). This is a migratory species that winters mostly in Afghanistan, Pakistan, north-western India, Nepal and northern China; less important wintering areas include northern Iran, the former Soviet states of Central Asia, Mongolia, and to a lesser extent Japan in Honshu and Hokkaido (Occhiato 2003, Brazil 2009). A second and more geographically isolated and apparently sedentary subspecies (Emberiza leucocephalos fronto), breeds in northern Qinghai and Gansu provinces, in China (Cramp and Perrins 1994, Byers et al. 1995). Though the range of the Pine Bunting is limited, this species does turn up as a rare, but regular vagrant in Europe. This species is often found amongst flocks of Yellowhammer (Emberiza citrinella) during the late fall and winter (Lewington et al. 1992). In North America, the Pine Bunting is an accidental vagrant that has occurred in Alaska in the western Aleutian Islands, and the Pribilof Islands. There are four records; including a bird found on Attu Island that was collected as a specimen November 18-19, 1985 (Wagner 1990); an immature male also found on Attu Island on October 6, 1993 (Gibson and Byrd 2007); a single bird found on St.
  • Title 50 Wildlife and Fisheries Parts 1 to 16

    Title 50 Wildlife and Fisheries Parts 1 to 16

    Title 50 Wildlife and Fisheries Parts 1 to 16 Revised as of October 1, 2018 Containing a codification of documents of general applicability and future effect As of October 1, 2018 Published by the Office of the Federal Register National Archives and Records Administration as a Special Edition of the Federal Register VerDate Sep<11>2014 08:08 Nov 27, 2018 Jkt 244234 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 8091 Sfmt 8091 Y:\SGML\244234.XXX 244234 rmajette on DSKBCKNHB2PROD with CFR U.S. GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL EDITION NOTICE Legal Status and Use of Seals and Logos The seal of the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) authenticates the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) as the official codification of Federal regulations established under the Federal Register Act. Under the provisions of 44 U.S.C. 1507, the contents of the CFR, a special edition of the Federal Register, shall be judicially noticed. The CFR is prima facie evidence of the origi- nal documents published in the Federal Register (44 U.S.C. 1510). It is prohibited to use NARA’s official seal and the stylized Code of Federal Regulations logo on any republication of this material without the express, written permission of the Archivist of the United States or the Archivist’s designee. Any person using NARA’s official seals and logos in a manner inconsistent with the provisions of 36 CFR part 1200 is subject to the penalties specified in 18 U.S.C. 506, 701, and 1017. Use of ISBN Prefix This is the Official U.S. Government edition of this publication and is herein identified to certify its authenticity.