Identification of Pine Bunting T

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Identification of Pine Bunting T Identification of Pine Bunting Daniele Occhiato he nominate subspecies of Pine Bunting tion between the two species in areas of sym- T Emberiza leucocephalos leucocephalos breeds patry on their Siberian breeding grounds. First- in a large part of Siberia from the western slopes generation hybrids, especially males, are gene- of the Ural (55° E) east to the Pacific, including rally distinctive and do not lead to confusion. Sakhalin and the Kuril Islands (c 155° E). It However, such hybrids are fertile, and back- ranges north to the Arctic Circle (66° N) and crosses with members of one or the other spe- south to northern Mongolia (50° N); a disjunct cies, or with other hybrids, lead to individuals in population breeds further south in the Altai, which evidence of hybridization is even more Tarbagatay, Ala Tau and Tien Shan mountain diluted, and often very difficult to detect in the ranges (45° N). A geographically isolated and field. In some cases, only careful in-hand exami- apparently sedentary subspecies, E l fronto, nation can reveal such hybrid characters. For breeds in northern Qinghai and Gansu prov- example, a study by Eugeny Panov (in Bradshaw inces, China (Cramp & Perrins 1994, Byers et al & Gray 1993) revealed that out of 239 adult 1995). The migratory nominate subspecies win- male Pine Bunting x Yellowhammer hybrids ters mostly in Afghanistan, Pakistan, north-west- studied in the hand in western Siberia, as many ern India, Nepal and northern China; less impor- as 58 were only identifiable as such by the yel- tant wintering areas include northern Iran, the low lesser underwing-coverts. A recent study by former Soviet states of Central Asia, Mongolia, Panov et al (2003) clearly shows that such and to a lesser extent Japan (Honshu and hybrids are increasingly frequent in the southern Hokkaido). Apart from being a regular breeder at part of the area where these two species are sym- the western Ural just inside the Western patric, and are encroaching on the range of Pine Palearctic, Pine Bunting is a rare but annual non- Bunting in particular. This means that in the fu- breeding visitor to other parts of the Western ture, Pine Bunting x Yellowhammer hybrids may Palearctic, with records throughout the year, al- be recorded with increasing frequency in Europe. though the majority are in autumn (October- In this paper, I present the knowledge I have November) and winter. This species has been acquired over the last few years on the identifica- recorded in nearly every European country, with tion of the nominate subspecies of Pine Bunting the majority of records coming from Britain, and its separation from Yellowhammer. Particular Belgium, France, the Netherlands and Slovenia attention is paid not only to female plumages, (Lewington et al 1991, Mitchell & Young 1997). which are notoriously difficult to identify in the However, in Italy, it is rare but regular in autumn field, but also to male plumages, which have and winter (Occhiato 2003). Pine Bunting is a received little attention in the literature (due to vagrant elsewhere in the Western Palearctic, males being relatively easy to identify) and except for Israel where it is rare but regular in whose details are still little known. The paper is autumn and winter (Shirihai 1996). based on data gathered in seven years of study- Pine Bunting is certainly the most frequent of ing Pine Buntings in Toscana, Italy, in the winters the Siberian buntings to stray to western Europe. from 1995/96 to 2001/02. These studies involved While the identification of males is generally over 110 individuals observed in the field straightforward, this cannot be said of females, between November and March, with particular especially in first-winter plumage. In particular, attention being paid to their phenology, plum- the identification of female Pine Bunting versus age, behaviour and vocalizations. female Yellowhammer E citrinella has been discussed at length in recent years (Lewington Size and structure 1990, Bradshaw & Gray 1993, Shirihai et al Pine Bunting is similar in size and structure to 1995), especially with regard to Yellowhammers Yellowhammer, but given optimal views (at close apparently lacking yellow pigments (assuming range), Pine Bunting often appears slightly larger that such individuals really exist). The separation (by c 10%) due to its longer tail and bigger head; of Pine Bunting from Yellowhammer is further wing length is also slightly longer in Pine complicated by the high frequency of hybridiza- Bunting, but this is only useful in the hand. [Dutch Birding 25: 1-16, 2003] 1 Identification of Pine Bunting Males in particular seem to show a slightly detailed analysis of the songs of both species, see squarer head compared with Yellowhammer, due Panov et al (2003). to the small crest that is often raised. The crest is also slightly further back on the head than in Calls Yellowhammer, as well as very slightly longer. The calls are very similar in both species and any The primary projection is similar in both species, possible differences are still poorly known. usually comprising two well-spaced primaries 1 Most typical contact call, short and dry, usually and a third, barely visible one. Pine Bunting, given when birds are perched or on the ground, however, often shows a fourth primary tip barely described as tchi’. Slightly higher pitched than similar projecting beyond the tertials, which Yellow- call of Yellowhammer. 2 Contact call, shorter, drier and lower pitched than hammer never shows (but beware of individuals call note 1, given both in flight and by perched birds, with new tertials that are not yet fully grown). In matching call 2a in Cramp & Perrins (1994), described Pine Bunting, the bill is usually slightly shorter as tch’. but this is subject to variability and is only ap- 3 Contact or alarm call, short and slightly raspy, given parent in the hand. Flight style and behaviour are when perched, matching call 2b in Cramp & Perrins similar in both species. (1994), described as dzjèu. Very slightly higher pitched Compared with Cirl Bunting E cirlus, with than similar call of Yellowhammer, and not always which it often occurs on its Italian wintering separable in the field. grounds, Pine Bunting is distinctly larger, as well 4 Contact or alarm call, similar to preceding call but sweeter, slightly nasal, somewhat finch-like and almost as longer tailed. These structural differences are certainly given under stress, as it is exclusively given by quite apparent in the field when the two species lone individuals and almost always in flight (but some- are seen together, especially in flight. Moreover, times also when perched), described as dsjìu. the primary projection is distinctly shorter in Cirl 5 Short and dry call, usually given on the ground, rare- Bunting, which only shows two primary tips be- ly in flight; very similar to Corn Bunting E calandra yond the tertials. calls, described as pt or pt-l. 6 Contact call given by flocks, given when perched, Vocalizations when taking flight, or in flight, described as tch–rr, The song and calls of Pine Bunting are very simi- tch-r-l-r. 7 Alarm call, given when perched just before taking lar in structure to those of Yellowhammer. Some flight, or when flushing out of fear (and often repeated Pine Bunting calls are slightly higher pitched in short series); the most characteristic call given by than those of Yellowhammer but these differ- birds flushed by humans, described as tcì–rrrrrrrr-l or ences can only be detected when the two spe- ptì–rlrlrlrlrlrlrl. Usually a little longer and slightly higher cies are together (or when comparing sona- pitched than similar call of Yellowhammer. grams). I had the opportunity to discern the subtle differences between the calls of these two species only in winter 2000/01, when at least Separation from female Yellowhammer four Pine Buntings and two to three Yellow- Much has been written in the last few years on hammers were present in the same flock at the identification of female Pine Bunting and its Macchia Lucchese, Toscana. In the same winter, separation from female Yellowhammer (Lewing- I was able to make sound recordings of some ton 1990, Svensson 1992, Bradshaw & Gray Pine Bunting calls at the same site. 1993, Shirihai et al 1995, Harris et al 1996). However, descriptions in the literature generally Song refer to female plumage without taking age into In general, the song of Pine Bunting is shorter account. For example, Bradshaw & Gray (1993) and slower than in Yellowhammer, with fewer, seemed to describe a first-winter female, while more evenly spaced initial notes. However, there Shirihai et al (1995) and Harris et al (1996) is much geographic variation in songs (which are describe the field marks of an adult-winter fe- often extremely similar to Yellowhammer), so male, although some of the characters they men- that the song itself is not very useful as an aid to tion are more typical of first-winter females. identification. The main differences lie in the Typical adult females Pine Bunting or Yellow- frequency of the initial notes, either evenly hammer, if seen well, do not generally pose spaced or accelerating, and the presence or lack serious identification problems. Doubts can, of the characteristic high-pitched final notes however, arise when dealing with first-winter (typical of Yellowhammer’s song) (Cramp & females of both species, and with adult female Perrins 1994, Panov et al 2003). For a more Yellowhammers apparently lacking yellow pig- 2 Identification of Pine Bunting 1 Pine Bunting / Witkopgors Emberiza leucocephalos, adult male, Duna di Migliarino, Toscana, Italy, 5 March 2000 (Daniele Occhiato). This individual shows a wide collar of dark grey spots.
Recommended publications
  • 444 Yellowhammer Put Your Logo Here
    Javier Blasco-Zumeta & Gerd-Michael Heinze Sponsor is needed. Write your name here 444 Yellowhammer Put your logo here Yellowhammer. Winter. Adult. Male (04-XI) Yellowhammer. Spring. Pattern of upperparts and YELLOWHAMMER (Emberiza citri- head: top male (Photo: nella) Ottenby Bird Observa- tory); bottom female IDENTIFICATION (Photo: Ottenby Bird Observatory). 14-18 cm. Breeding male with yellow head; reddish upperparts, brown streaked; chestnut- reddish rump and uppertail coverts, unstreaked; bluish bill; in winter similar to female. Female more brownish and streaked than male. Yellowhammer. Juvenile. Pattern of head (Photo: Ondrej Kauzal) and up- perparts (Photo: Alejan- dro Corregidor). SIMILAR SPECIES Male in breeding plumage unmistakable. Fe- Yellowhammer. Win- male similar to female Cirl Bunting which ter. Pattern of upper- has grey-olive rump and lacks pale patch on parts and head: top nape. Female Ortolan Bunting has brown rump male; bottom female. and grey-buff underparts. Juveniles Yellowham- mer are unmistakable due to their chestnut rump. http://blascozumeta.com Write your website here Page 1 Javier Blasco-Zumeta & Gerd-Michael Heinze Sponsor is needed. Write your name here 444 Yellowhammer Put your logo here Yellowham- mer. Spring. Sexing. Pat- tern of head: top male (Photo: Ot- tenby Bird Observa- tory); bot- tom female (Photo: Ot- tenby Bird Observa- Cirl Bunting. Female tory). Yellowhammer. Spring. Sexing. Pattern of breast: Ortolan Bunting. 1st year. left male (Photo: Reinhard Vohwinkel); right female (Photo: Reinhard Vohwinkel). SEXING In breeding plumage, male with head and under- parts deep yellow. Female with head and under- parts brownish. After postbreeding/postjuvenile moults, adult male with crown feathers yellow on more than half length without a dark shaft streak.
    [Show full text]
  • Vegliste 2011
    GRATIS Vegliste 2011 FYLKES- OG KOMMUNALE VEGER Vest-Agder Innledning Vegliste for fylkes- og kommunale veger i Vest-Agder fylke inneholder opplysninger om veggrupper for spesialtransporter, vegens tillatte bruksklasse sommer og vinter, samt tillatt totalvekt og vogntoglengde. Veggrupper for spesialtransport Veggruppe A: Veger som har bruer med flere kjørefelt, nyere bruer med ett kjørefelt eller veger som ikke har bruer. Veggruppe B: Veger med øvrige bruer med ett kjørefelt. For veger som er markert med ”IKKE” i kolonnen for veggruppe gjelder ikke dispensasjon for spesialtransport uten tidsbegrensning. Bruksklasse sommer Bruksklasse sommer er vegens generelle tillatte bruksklasse, utenom periodene med vinteraksellast og eventuelle perioder med nedsatt aksellast i teleløsningsperioden. Bruksklasse vinter Tidspunkt for innføring og oppheving av forhøyet tillatt aksellast på frossen veg kunngjøres i lokalpressen/lokalradio. Ordningen gjelder kun for de strekninger som er oppført med bruksklasse i kolonnen for vinteraksellast i veglisten. Ved mildværsperioder kan ordningen oppheves med øyeblikkelig virkning. Vinteraksellasten oppheves når teleløsningen begynner. Aksellast i teleløsningsperioden På fylkesveger vil det bare unntaksvis bli innført restriksjoner i teleløsningen. På kommunale veger kan omfanget variere fra kommune til kommune. Veglisten inneholder ikke opplysninger om aksellast i teleløsningen. Det kan likevel bli innført restriksjoner på enkelte svake strekninger. Tidspunkt for eventuelle restriksjoner og hvilken aksellast som gjelder vil bli kunngjort lokalt, og skilt vil bli satt opp på de aktuelle strekninger. For opplysning om restriksjoner er innført, kontakt den enkelte kommune eller vegtrafikksentralen (VTS) tlf. 175. Vi henstiller til transportørene og transportbrukere å planlegge og tilrettelegge sine transporter slik at belastningen på spesielt svake veger blir minst mulig i teleløsningen.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the United States National Museum
    i procp:edings of uxited states national :\[uset7m. 359 23498 g. D. 13 5 A. 14; Y. 3; P. 35; 0. 31 ; B. S. Leiigtli ICT millime- ters. GGGl. 17 specimeus. St. Michaels, Alaslai. II. M. Bannister. a. Length 210 millimeters. D. 13; A. 14; V. 3; P. 33; C— ; B. 8. h. Length 200 millimeters. D. 14: A. 14; Y. 3; P. 35; C— ; B. 8. e. Length 135 millimeters. D. 12: A. 14; Y. 3; P. 35; C. 30; B. 8. The remaining fourteen specimens vary in length from 110 to 180 mil- limeters. United States National Museum, WasJiingtoiij January 5, 1880. FOURTBI III\.STAI.:HEIVT OF ©R!VBTBIOI.O«ICAI. BIBI.IOCiRAPHV r BE:INC} a Jf.ffJ^T ©F FAUIVA!. I»l.TjBf.S«'ATI©.\S REff,ATIIV« T© BRIT- I!§H RIRD!^. My BR. ELS^IOTT COUES, U. S. A. The zlppendix to the "Birds of the Colorado Yalley- (pp. 507 [lJ-784 [218]), which gives the titles of "Faunal Publications" relating to North American Birds, is to be considered as the first instalment of a "Uni- versal Bibliography of Ornithology''. The second instalment occupies pp. 230-330 of the " Bulletin of the United States Geological and Geographical Survey of the Territories 'V Yol. Y, No. 2, Sept. G, 1879, and similarly gives the titles of "Faunal Publications" relating to the Birds of the rest of America.. The.third instalment, which occnpies the same "Bulletin", same Yol.,, No. 4 (in press), consists of an entirely different set of titles, being those belonging to the "systematic" department of the whole Bibliography^ in so far as America is concerned.
    [Show full text]
  • Hudson River Birding Trail
    Species Sp Su F W Species Sp Su F W W Swans, Geese, and Ducks Eagles, Hawks (continued) Snow Goose Rough-legged Hawk Brant Golden Eagle Canada Goose * Falcons Mute Swan (I) * American Kestrel * Bird Checklist Wood Duck * Merlin * Gadwall * Gyrfalcon American Wigeon * Peregrine Falcon * American Black Duck * Rails, Gallinules, and Coots Hudson River Mallard * King Rail * Blue-winged Teal * Virginia Rail * Northern Shoveler Sora * Northern Pintail Common Moorhen * Birding Trail Green-winged Teal * American Coot * Canvasback Cranes Redhead Sandhill Crane Ring-necked Duck Plovers Greater Scaup Black-bellied Plover Lesser Scaup American Golden-Plover Surf Scoter Semipalmated Plover White-winged Scoter Killdeer * Black Scoter Sandpipers, Phalaropes, and Allies Long-tailed Duck Greater Yellowlegs Bufflehead Lesser Yellowlegs Common Goldeneye Solitary Sandpiper Hooded Merganser * Spotted Sandpiper * Common Merganser * Upland Sandpiper Red-breasted Merganser Hudsonian Godwit Ruddy Duck Marbled Godwit Grouse, and Turkeys Red Knot Ring-necked Pheasant (I) * Sanderling Ruffed Grouse * Semipalmated Sandpiper Wild Turkey * Western Sandpiper Loons Least Sandpiper Red-throated Loon White-rumped Sandpiper Common Loon * Pectoral Sandpiper Grebes Dunlin Pied-billed Grebe * Stilt Sandpiper Horned Grebe Buff-breasted Sandpiper Red-necked Grebe Short-billed Dowitcher Cormorants Long-billed Dowitcher Double-crested Cormorant * Wilson’s Snipe * Great Cormorant American Woodcock * Bitterns, Herons Wilson’s Phalarope American Bittern * Red-necked Phalarope Least
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond Fish Edna Metabarcoding: Field Replicates Disproportionately Improve the Detection of Stream Associated Vertebrate Specie
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.26.437227; this version posted March 26, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC 4.0 International license. 1 2 3 Beyond fish eDNA metabarcoding: Field replicates 4 disproportionately improve the detection of stream 5 associated vertebrate species 6 7 8 9 Till-Hendrik Macher1, Robin Schütz1, Jens Arle2, Arne J. Beermann1,3, Jan 10 Koschorreck2, Florian Leese1,3 11 12 13 1 University of Duisburg-Essen, Aquatic Ecosystem Research, Universitätsstr. 5, 45141 Essen, 14 Germany 15 2German Environmental Agency, Wörlitzer Platz 1, 06844 Dessau-Roßlau, Germany 16 3University of Duisburg-Essen, Centre for Water and Environmental Research (ZWU), Universitätsstr. 17 3, 45141 Essen, Germany 18 19 20 21 22 Keywords: birds, biomonitoring, bycatch, conservation, environmental DNA, mammals 23 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.26.437227; this version posted March 26, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC 4.0 International license. 24 Abstract 25 Fast, reliable, and comprehensive biodiversity monitoring data are needed for 26 environmental decision making and management. Recent work on fish environmental 27 DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding shows that aquatic diversity can be captured fast, reliably, 28 and non-invasively at moderate costs.
    [Show full text]
  • Scottish Birds
    SB 30(2) COV 27/5/10 10:55 Page 1 The pair of Ptarmigan were roosting either side of a PhotoSP T boulder, and observing them for a while, they didn’t Plate 155. On a wintery day© in March 2010 I drove move. I decided to move a little bit closer to try and to the Cairngorms to record any birds I might see. capture a picture and I did this every five minutes or SCOTTISH There was snow at 1000 feet, and the mountain I so until I got to a decent distance for the 400 mm decided to climb was not far from thousands of lens. The picture I believe gives a real feeling to the skiers. I encountered Red Grouse at 1500 feet and extreme habitat in which Ptarmigan exist. I backed just a little bit higher at c. 2000 feet I came across off and left them to roost in peace. my first Ptarmigan. There was also a pair slightly BIRDS higher at c. 2900 feet. For people who are interested in camera gear, I used a Canon 40D, 400 mm lens and a Bushawk On my climb I also found foot prints of Mountain shoulder mount. Volume 30 (2) 30 (2) Volume Hare and more grouse. I’m sure the Ptarmigan had been forced lower down the hill to feed, as there John Chapman was so much snow cover and on the tops it must (www.johnchapmanphotographer.co.uk) have been -15°C the night before. Scottish Birds June 2010 published by the SCOTTISH ORNITHOLOGISTS’ CLUB Featuring the best images posted on the SOC website each quarter, PhotoSpot will present stunning portraits as well as record shots of something unique, accompanied by the story behind the photograph and the equipment used.
    [Show full text]
  • Årsberetning Og Regnskap 2017
    INNHOLD: STYRETS BERETNING……………………………………...side 1 RESULTATREGNSKAP……………………………………..side 11 BALANSE…............................................................................. side 13 KONTANTSTRØMOPPSTILLING ......................................... side 15 NOTER TIL REGNSKAPET ....................................................side 16 SAMFUNNSANSVAR .............................................................. side 33 REVISORS BERETNING ......................................................... side 35 BANKENS TILLITSVALGTE ................................................. side 38 Side 1 FLEKKEFJORD SPAREBANK STYRETS BERETNING FOR 2017 181. DRIFTSÅR Norsk økonomi 2017 *) stod for et solid bidrag, med en vekst i overkant Verdensøkonomien viste i 2017 klare tegn på av 6 prosent. Veksten i Kina tilskrives økt optimisme og sterkere vekst. Aktiviteten ekspansiv finanspolitikk og høy aktivitet i hos flere av Norges sentrale handelspartnere boligmarkedet. Flere forhold taler for at Kinas tok seg opp og arbeidsledigheten falt i flere veksttakt vil bli noe lavere fremover. land til lavere nivåer enn i perioden før finanskrisen. I tillegg så man høyere Aktiviteten i Fastlands-Norge tok seg opp i investeringsvekst og fortsatt sterk 2017 etter et 2016 med den svakeste veksten forbruksvekst. Utviklingen har vært siden finanskrisen. Veksten ble om lag understøttet av en svært ekspansiv fordoblet, til i underkant av 2 prosent. Dette pengepolitikk som har inkludert utradisjonelle ligger tett opptil den årlige veksttakten som tiltak, i form av verdipapirkjøp, i mange land. Norges Bank forventer de nærmeste årene. Det lave rentenivået må ses i sammenheng med en prisvekst som har holdt seg lav. I takt Boliginvesteringene har vært en av de sentrale med at aktiviteten har økt har sentralbankene i bidragsyterne til økt vekst. Som følge av sterk flere land startet utfasingen av de prisutviklingen i boligmarkedet over flere år, og ekstraordinære tiltakene, og også hevet særlig i 2016, ble det igangsatt bygging av et styringsrenten enkelte steder. betydelig antall boliger i 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • 802 B. Trykk Nr. 80Z B
    802 b. Trykk nr. 80Z b.- Tje-neateskrifter utgitt av Norges, Statsbaner Hovedstyret. HOLDEPLASSER ' ·· ved N S B Gjelder fra 1. oktober 1958 • .> ' Rettelsesbladet ska l etter foretatt kompletter~ng av tryk­ ket reg istrer es her . -=- -====--==-=-=------- ==-:==========:;::::==-================= ============= . Rettelsesbla-----d - ---------.c.;.~-----Rettelsesbl at Nr . I d Innfort Me rknad I Nr . ,--,,-_In_n-,-f_o_·r_t_ Me ,•knad --tT---+--i en , av ·-+-~----i<---+--_,.....-den a.v._.. _ ______ .--1_J]::i1~~ -------++-1-"9'--...---- --------+-- -------- --- ~ I 2 /lb ~3 i~)\-' 20 _3 __ 1tt_!t570 Y- 2h _ ___ ---~---------- 4 i 22 ,. ---!~3.Æ 4, !I t;mJ ·--·- ·--·- ·--- """'!'"~--- ► · • · --~ . .....----1,--,------- 5 );->!'.- . 23 ; ~Æ~~f ~,-~-:--11-2~4~----------- / .) -;7 66 __ _:!_ _ - ' - /11 --61 . __ '_ 2-T, ·---1,------+---------- _Lt,3 -;" : _§_tcillu.W._,,. ____ . -~_?__ ___ __ __________ ' i ---'--e;-9 I ·------+---- ~-- -·-27 ---..-----;-----;--------- 28 ~: [___,__ ---- ------·----~--------------29 ~·-----1---------+I--'~'--:___ _.__ ______ _ ,J I ~~-------+----- ---·- ·--~32 ·-------- _l.c._5_ ! -----------~3.~3 -1-_ __..,.___ __..,. ______ _ _ 16 34 I _1_7-+----+----1-------11-3;;...:5'---1·----~-------- I 18 I 36 ' I I JI - 3 - F O R O R D Trykket inneholder en fortegnelse over ho 1 de p 1 asser ved Norges Statsbaner. Disse holdeplasser er ikke tatt inn i trykk nr. 8o2a og kommer således som tillegg til de ekspedisjonssteder som er tatt inn der. Det er ingen ekspedisjonsmuligheter til holdeplasser s om ligger uten­ for egen bane eller eget distrikt. Retningslinjer for ekspedisjon innen eget distrikt fastsettes av distriktsjefen. Man gjør merksam på at betegnelsen HP (Holdeplass) ikke har samme mening i dette trykk som i Tjenestereglementet.
    [Show full text]
  • XVIII. Observations on Some Species of British Quadrupeds, Birds, and Fishes
    xtTTII.Obsewations 01) some Species of' British Quadrupeds, Birds, and Fides. By George .nhtagt(, Esq. F. L.S. Read December 20, 1803, Toa society founded on so libcral a basis as the Linnean Society there needs no introduction to the miscellaneous witings of an individual, whose object can only be the diffusion of knowledge on partial subjects of natural history. With this view I beg leave to lay before the Society the fol- lowing observations on a few species of British birds whose his- tory appears to be imperfectly known; together with a few addi- tional reinarks on two of our smallest quadrupeds; and a descrip- tion of a beautiful fish, the Cepola descem, hitherto? I believe,. not iioticed on our coast; and of two other rare species. I-IARVEST &!fOUSE. hIus Messorius.. Shaw Xool. ii. p. G2.jg. vignett.e. Mus rninutus. Gmel. Syt. p. 130. S.? IIarvest &use. Br. Xool. i. y. 107. Pennant Quadr. ii. p. 384. White Seh. p. 33. 39. This elegant little species of mouse, first noticed by Rlr. V'hitc as inhabiiing the corn-fields and ricks about Selborn, and, through his conirnunication, first made public by Mr. Pennant as indigenous to England, is by no means confined to I-Iamp- shire; for we well renieinber it was common in t.he inore cliani- paign parts of Wiltshire in our punger days, and previous to the disco very discovery of it by RTr. IVhite : and we liarc si1ic.c thmc juvenilc days found it in other parts of the saine county, in Glouccstcr- shire contiguous, and in the south of' Devonsliire.
    [Show full text]
  • Somerset's Ecological Network
    Somerset’s Ecological Network Mapping the components of the ecological network in Somerset 2015 Report This report was produced by Michele Bowe, Eleanor Higginson, Jake Chant and Michelle Osbourn of Somerset Wildlife Trust, and Larry Burrows of Somerset County Council, with the support of Dr Kevin Watts of Forest Research. The BEETLE least-cost network model used to produce Somerset’s Ecological Network was developed by Forest Research (Watts et al, 2010). GIS data and mapping was produced with the support of Somerset Environmental Records Centre and First Ecology Somerset Wildlife Trust 34 Wellington Road Taunton TA1 5AW 01823 652 400 Email: michele.bowe@somersetwildlife.org somersetwildlife.org Front Cover: Broadleaved woodland ecological network in East Mendip Contents 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................... 1 2. Policy and Legislative Background to Ecological Networks ............................................ 3 Introduction ............................................................................................................... 3 Government White Paper on the Natural Environment .............................................. 3 National Planning Policy Framework ......................................................................... 3 The Habitats and Birds Directives ............................................................................. 4 The Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2010 ..................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mathew, M A, a Revised List of the Birds of Somerset, Part II, Volume 39
    9 IRetHseO Ht0t of tfce T6ttO0 of Somerset BY THE REV. MURRAY A. MATHEW, M.A., F.L.S. Vicar of Buckland Dinham, Member of the British Ornitho- logists' Union, and one of the authors of" The Birds of DevonT WHEN Mr. Cecil Smith published his Birds of Somerset, in 1869, he was able to record but 217 species, to which he subsequently added ten others in a list contributed by him to Vol. xvi of the Transactions of the Somerset Archaaological and Natural History Society (for 1870), thus bringing the total number of birds for Somerset to 227. But even this number appears inadequate to repre- sent the Ornis of so large a county as Somerset, when it is compared with the lists which have been made out for the adjoining counties. Thus for Wiltshire, a county which comes far behind Somerset in geographical importance, as it possesses no coast line, the Rev. A. Smith was able to . C. enumerate 235 species ; in Dorsetshire, Col. Mansel-Pleydell, as was to be expected, had a fuller list, numbering 254 species, to which we are able to add three others, thus bringing the Dorsetshire county birds to a total of 257 ; while for Devon- shire, which has a sea frontage both on the north and south, as many as 300 species can be claimed. With the wild tract of Exmoor Forest and its beautiful fringe of woods ; with the Quantocks, the Blagdon Hills, the Mendip and other hills ; with the curious peat-moor district, occupying the centre of ; A Revised List of the Birds of Somerset.
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond Fish Edna Metabarcoding: Field Replicates Disproportionately Improve the Detection of Stream Associated Vertebrate Species
    Metabarcoding and Metagenomics 5: 59–71 DOI 10.3897/mbmg.5.66557 Research Article Beyond fish eDNA metabarcoding: Field replicates disproportionately improve the detection of stream associated vertebrate species Till-Hendrik Macher1, Robin Schütz1, Jens Arle2, Arne J. Beermann1,3, Jan Koschorreck2, Florian Leese1,3 1 University of Duisburg-Essen, Aquatic Ecosystem Research, Universitätsstr. 5, 45141 Essen, Germany 2 German Environment Agency, Wörlitzer Platz 1, 06844 Dessau-Roßlau, Germany 3 University of Duisburg-Essen, Centre for Water and Environmental Research (ZWU), Universitätsstr. 3, 45141 Essen, Germany Corresponding author: Till-Hendrik Macher (till-hendrik.macher@uni-due.de) Academic editor: Pieter Boets | Received 26 March 2021 | Accepted 10 June 2021 | Published 13 July 2021 Abstract Fast, reliable, and comprehensive biodiversity monitoring data are needed for environmental decision making and management. Recent work on fish environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding shows that aquatic diversity can be captured fast, reliably, and non-invasively at moderate costs. Because water in a catchment flows to the lowest point in the landscape, often a stream, it can col- lect traces of terrestrial species via surface or subsurface runoff along its way or when specimens come into direct contact with water (e.g., when drinking). Thus, fish eDNA metabarcoding data can provide information on fish but also on other vertebrate species that live in riparian habitats. This additional data may offer a much more comprehensive approach for assessing vertebrate diversity at no additional costs. Studies on how the sampling strategy affects species detection especially of stream-associated communities, however, are scarce. We therefore performed an analysis on the effects of biological replication on both fish as well as (semi-)terrestrial species detection.
    [Show full text]