DOCSLIB.ORG

The Significance of Cape Sounion

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Significance of Cape Sounion THE SIGNIFICANCE OF CAPE SOUNION The Importance of the Cape for the Broader Region of Sounion and the Athenian Polis Alexandros Mourtzos MA (Research) Thesis Ancient Studies Utrecht University Alexandros Mourtzos 5841763 [email protected] Supervisors: Prof. Dr. Josine Blok Dr. Floris van den Eijnde 21/6/2018 Cover Image: Mariketi Graikioti, Cape Sounion from the west. 2 CONTENTS Abbreviations .................................................................................................................. 5 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 6 CHAPTER 1 The History of Cape Sounion, An Analysis ....................................................................... 11 1. 1 The Promontory (PLATE 1) ...................................................................................... 13 1. 2 The Sanctuary of Poseidon (PLATE 2) ...................................................................... 15 1.2.1 The Archaic Temple ................................................................................................ 17 1.2.2 The Classical Temple (PLATES 3-4) ......................................................................... 19 1.2.3 The Sanctuary’s Walls and other Structures .......................................................... 20 1.2.4 The Fort and Settlement ......................................................................................... 21 1.2.5 The Landfill and the Bothros ................................................................................... 22 1.2.6 A Cult of Herakles? ................................................................................................. 24 1. 3 The Sanctuary of Athena (Plates 9-10) .................................................................... 27 1.3.1 The Small Temple ................................................................................................... 29 1.3.2 The Large “Unusual” Temple .................................................................................. 31 1.3.3 Other Structures ..................................................................................................... 32 1.3.4 The Sanctuary’s Wall and the Oval Enclosure ........................................................ 33 1.3.5 The landfill and the Bothros ................................................................................... 33 1.3.6 A Cult of Phrontis? .................................................................................................. 35 1. 4 Other Deities of the Promontory ............................................................................ 37 1. 5 Conclusion ............................................................................................................... 38 CHAPTER 2 A Place of Mediation, Competition and Sovereignty? ...................................................... 40 2.1. The two Gods of the Promontory ................................................................................. 40 2.1.1 Poseidon ................................................................................................................. 41 2.1.2 Athena .................................................................................................................... 45 2.1.3 The Relationship Between the Two Gods .............................................................. 47 2.2 Discussing the Offerings from the Bothroi .................................................................... 50 2.3 The Kouroi ..................................................................................................................... 53 2.3.1 Uses and Meaning of the Kouros Type ................................................................... 54 2.3.2 What did the Kouroi Represent and to Whom they were Dedicated? .................. 56 3 2.3.3 Who were the dedicators? ..................................................................................... 59 2.3.4 Why were the Kouroi Erected on the Promontory? ............................................... 59 2.4 An Examination of the Frieze of the Classical Temple of Poseidon .............................. 61 2.5 Conclusion ..................................................................................................................... 64 CHAPTER 3 The Laureotike Region and its Importance for the Athenian Polis .................................... 66 3.1 The Pre-Kleisthenic Era .................................................................................................. 67 3.2 The Post Kleisthenic Era – The Sounion Demos ............................................................ 70 3.2.1 The Inhabited Areas and the Centres of the Demos .............................................. 71 3.2.2 Public Buildings ....................................................................................................... 73 3.3 The Mines and their Importance for the Polis and the Sounion Demos ...................... 75 3.3.1 The Beginning of the Mining Activity ..................................................................... 75 3.3.2 Ownership of the Mines and the Revenues of the Polis ........................................ 77 3.3.3 Benefits from the Silver Mining .............................................................................. 80 3.4 Roads ............................................................................................................................ 81 3.5 Conclusion .................................................................................................................... 83 CHAPTER 4 Other Rural Sanctuaries on the Borders of Attica ............................................................ 85 4.1 Eleusis ............................................................................................................................ 86 4.2 Brauron .......................................................................................................................... 89 4.3 Rhamnous ...................................................................................................................... 90 4.4 Mounichia ...................................................................................................................... 92 4.5 Conclusion – A Comparison of the Sanctuaries ............................................................ 94 CONCLUSION ................................................................................................................. 97 LIST OF PLATES ............................................................................................................. 102 PLATES ........................................................................................................................ 106 BIBLIOGRAPHY ............................................................................................................. 130 4 Abbreviations GHI Rhodes, P.J. and Osborne R. (2003) Greek Historical Inscriptions 404-323 BC, Oxford University Press. IG Inscriptiones Graecae. NM National Museum of Archeology, Athens. 5 INTRODUCTION The voyage from the main port of Athens, Piraeus, to the Aegean islands, is always a pleasant experience. During the first hour of the journey the ship sails along the southeast side of the Attic peninsula. Before leaving the Saronic Gulf and finally entering the Aegean Sea, the ship passes in front of the southernmost point of Attica, the triangular promontory of Sounion. At that point the traveler has the chance to admire the outstanding Classical marble temple of Poseidon positioned on the edge of the high cliff, 60 meters above the sea. However, the sanctuary of the sea god is not the only one on the promontory. On a lower hill, just a little further north, lie the ruins of the Classical temple of Athena. The third eastern hill has –apart from two early Helladic graves– no archaeological interest. A pavilion has been set up there for the tourists who visit the two archaeological sites.1 The cape is the last piece of Attic land which the traveler observes before entering the Aegean Sea, and the first when he returns to Athens. The situation was the same for a traveler in ancient times. Indeed, according to the primary literary sources, Cape Sounion was known as a landmark to ancient sailors and merchants.2 The uniqueness of the promontory is more than visible. It is located in the middle of various sea-routes and its huge steep cliff transformed it into a natural defensible fort. Thus, the location of the sanctuaries was not a random one. The cape was of major importance for the Athenians for many reasons which I would like to research. According to the archeological finds, Cape Sounion was no exception to the expansion of the cult activity which took place in Attica from the early 8th until the late 7th century BC.3 At the beginning of the 7th century BC –if not earlier– the sanctuaries of Poseidon and Athena were established on the promontory. Possibly, 1 Dinsmoor (1971): 1-2. The graves have been discovered by Theocharis. For more see Theocharis (1955): 287. 2 The first reference to Sounion, can be found in Odyssey (3.276- 285), where it is mentioned as “Σούνιον ἰρὸν, ἄκρον Ἀθηνέων”. [ “Holy Sounion, the cape of Athens”. Translation by Theodoropoulou-Polychroniadis (2015): 242.] From the 5th century B.C. onwards, the promontory appears frequently in the works of the ancient authors. Notably, Strabo examines its location. For more see Strabo 2.1.40, 9.1.1., 9.1.21. 3 Parker (1996):
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Abai, Oracle of Apollo, 134 Achaia, 3Map; LH IIIC
    INDEX Abai, oracle of Apollo, 134 Aghios Kosmas, 140 Achaia, 3map; LH IIIC pottery, 148; migration Aghios Minas (Drosia), 201 to northeast Aegean from, 188; nonpalatial Aghios Nikolaos (Vathy), 201 modes of political organization, 64n1, 112, Aghios Vasileios (Laconia), 3map, 9, 73n9, 243 120, 144; relations with Corinthian Gulf, 127; Agnanti, 158 “warrior burials”, 141. 144, 148, 188. See also agriculture, 18, 60, 207; access to resources, Ahhiyawa 61, 86, 88, 90, 101, 228; advent of iron Achaians, 110, 243 ploughshare, 171; Boeotia, 45–46; centralized Acharnai (Menidi), 55map, 66, 68map, 77map, consumption, 135; centralized production, 97–98, 104map, 238 73, 100, 113, 136; diffusion of, 245; East Lokris, Achinos, 197map, 203 49–50; Euboea, 52, 54, 209map; house-hold administration: absence of, 73, 141; as part of and community-based, 21, 135–36; intensified statehood, 66, 69, 71; center, 82; centralized, production, 70–71; large-scale (project), 121, 134, 238; complex offices for, 234; foreign, 64, 135; Lelantine Plain, 85, 207, 208–10; 107; Linear A, 9; Linear B, 9, 75–78, 84, nearest-neighbor analysis, 57; networks 94, 117–18; palatial, 27, 65, 69, 73–74, 105, of production, 101, 121; palatial control, 114; political, 63–64, 234–35; religious, 217; 10, 65, 69–70, 75, 81–83, 97, 207; Phokis, systems, 110, 113, 240; writing as technology 47; prehistoric Iron Age, 204–5, 242; for, 216–17 redistribution of products, 81, 101–2, 113, 135; Aegina, 9, 55map, 67, 99–100, 179, 219map subsistence, 73, 128, 190, 239; Thessaly 51, 70, Aeolians, 180, 187, 188 94–95; Thriasian Plain, 98 “age of heroes”, 151, 187, 200, 213, 222, 243, 260 agropastoral societies, 21, 26, 60, 84, 170 aggrandizement: competitive, 134; of the sea, 129; Ahhiyawa, 108–11 self-, 65, 66, 105, 147, 251 Aigai, 82 Aghia Elousa, 201 Aigaleo, Mt., 54, 55map, 96 Aghia Irini (Kea), 139map, 156, 197map, 199 Aigeira, 3map, 141 Aghia Marina Pyrgos, 77map, 81, 247 Akkadian, 105, 109, 255 Aghios Ilias, 85.
    [Show full text]
  • Greek Art in Motion Studies in Honour of Sir John Boardman ​On the Occasion of His 90Th Birthday
    Greek Art in Motion Studies in honour of Sir John Boardman on the occasion of his 90th birthday edited by Rui Morais, Delfim Leão, Diana Rodríguez Pérez with Daniela Ferreira Archaeopress Archaeology © Archaeopress and the authors, 2019. Archaeopress Publishing Ltd Summertown Pavilion 18-24 Middle Way Summertown Oxford OX2 7LG www.archaeopress.com ISBN 978 1 78969 023 1 ISBN 978 1 78969 024 8 (e-Pdf) © Archaeopress and the individual authors 2019 Cover: Head of Alexander in profile. Tourmaline intaglio, 25 x 25 mm, Ashmolean (1892.1499) G.J. Chester Bequest. Photo: C. Wagner. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the copyright owners. Printed in England by Oxuniprint, Oxford This book is available direct from Archaeopress or from our website www.archaeopress.com © Archaeopress and the authors, 2019. Contents Preface ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������1 John Boardman and Greek Sculpture �����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������3 Olga Palagia Sanctuaries and the Hellenistic Polis: An Architectural Approach �����������������������������������������������������������������������������������14 Milena Melfi ‘Even the fragments, however, merit scrutiny’: Ancient
    [Show full text]
  • Full Thesis Text Only
    A DIACHRONIC EXAMINATION OF THE ERECHTHEION AND ITS RECEPTION Alexandra L. Lesk, B.A., M.St. (Oxon.), M.A. Presented to McMicken College of Arts and Sciences and the Department of Classics of the University of Cincinnati in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2004 Committee: C. Brian Rose (Chair) Jack L. Davis Kathleen M. Lynch J. James Coulton Abstract iii ABSTRACT “A Diachronic Examination of the Erechtheion and Its Reception” examines the social life of the Ionic temple on the Athenian Akropolis, which was built in the late 5th century B.C. to house Athens’ most sacred cults and relics. Using a contextualized diachronic approach, this study examines both the changes to the Erechtheion between its construction and the middle of the 19th century A.D., as well as the impact the temple had on the architecture and art of these successive periods. This approach allows the evidence to shed light on new areas of interest such as the Post-Antique phases of the building, in addition to affording a better understanding of problems that have plagued the study of the Erechtheion during the past two centuries. This study begins with a re-examination of all the pertinent archaeological, epigraphical, and literary evidence, and proposes a wholly new reconstruction of how the Erechtheion worked physically and ritually in ancient times. After accounting for the immediate influence of the Erechtheion on subsequent buildings of the Ionic order, an argument for a Hellenistic rather than Augustan date for the major repairs to the temple is presented.
    [Show full text]
  • HOMERIC-ILIAD.Pdf
    Homeric Iliad Translated by Samuel Butler Revised by Soo-Young Kim, Kelly McCray, Gregory Nagy, and Timothy Power Contents Rhapsody 1 Rhapsody 2 Rhapsody 3 Rhapsody 4 Rhapsody 5 Rhapsody 6 Rhapsody 7 Rhapsody 8 Rhapsody 9 Rhapsody 10 Rhapsody 11 Rhapsody 12 Rhapsody 13 Rhapsody 14 Rhapsody 15 Rhapsody 16 Rhapsody 17 Rhapsody 18 Rhapsody 19 Rhapsody 20 Rhapsody 21 Rhapsody 22 Rhapsody 23 Rhapsody 24 Homeric Iliad Rhapsody 1 Translated by Samuel Butler Revised by Soo-Young Kim, Kelly McCray, Gregory Nagy, and Timothy Power [1] Anger [mēnis], goddess, sing it, of Achilles, son of Peleus— 2 disastrous [oulomenē] anger that made countless pains [algea] for the Achaeans, 3 and many steadfast lives [psūkhai] it drove down to Hādēs, 4 heroes’ lives, but their bodies it made prizes for dogs [5] and for all birds, and the Will of Zeus was reaching its fulfillment [telos]— 6 sing starting from the point where the two—I now see it—first had a falling out, engaging in strife [eris], 7 I mean, [Agamemnon] the son of Atreus, lord of men, and radiant Achilles. 8 So, which one of the gods was it who impelled the two to fight with each other in strife [eris]? 9 It was [Apollo] the son of Leto and of Zeus. For he [= Apollo], infuriated at the king [= Agamemnon], [10] caused an evil disease to arise throughout the mass of warriors, and the people were getting destroyed, because the son of Atreus had dishonored Khrysēs his priest. Now Khrysēs had come to the ships of the Achaeans to free his daughter, and had brought with him a great ransom [apoina]: moreover he bore in his hand the scepter of Apollo wreathed with a suppliant’s wreath [15] and he besought the Achaeans, but most of all the two sons of Atreus, who were their chiefs.
    [Show full text]
  • Athenians and Eleusinians in the West Pediment of the Parthenon
    ATHENIANS AND ELEUSINIANS IN THE WEST PEDIMENT OF THE PARTHENON (PLATE 95) T HE IDENTIFICATION of the figuresin the west pedimentof the Parthenonhas long been problematic.I The evidencereadily enables us to reconstructthe composition of the pedimentand to identify its central figures.The subsidiaryfigures, however, are rath- er more difficult to interpret. I propose that those on the left side of the pediment may be identifiedas membersof the Athenian royal family, associatedwith the goddessAthena, and those on the right as membersof the Eleusinian royal family, associatedwith the god Posei- don. This alignment reflects the strife of the two gods on a heroic level, by referringto the legendary war between Athens and Eleusis. The recognition of the disjunctionbetween Athenians and Eleusinians and of parallelism and contrastbetween individualsand groups of figures on the pedimentpermits the identificationof each figure. The referenceto Eleusis in the pediment,moreover, indicates the importanceof that city and its majorcult, the Eleu- sinian Mysteries, to the Athenians. The referencereflects the developmentand exploitation of Athenian control of the Mysteries during the Archaic and Classical periods. This new proposalfor the identificationof the subsidiaryfigures of the west pedimentthus has critical I This article has its origins in a paper I wrote in a graduateseminar directedby ProfessorJohn Pollini at The Johns Hopkins University in 1979. I returned to this paper to revise and expand its ideas during 1986/1987, when I held the Jacob Hirsch Fellowship at the American School of Classical Studies at Athens. In the summer of 1988, I was given a grant by the Committeeon Research of Tulane University to conduct furtherresearch for the article.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 BRITISH SCHOOL at ATHENS 47Th Annual Course For
    1 BRITISH SCHOOL AT ATHENS 47th Annual Course for Undergraduates The Archaeology and Topography of Ancient Greece 18th August – 7th September 2019 PROVISIONAL ITINERARY DATE DAY TIME SITE AUGUST 08.30-23.30 Arrival at the BSA Sunday 18 1 20.00 Informal dinner Monday 19 2 08.00-09.30 Breakfast 09.30-10.15 Introductory Session in Finlay Common Room 10.15-11.00 Library and Archive Tour 11.00-11.30 Coffee Break in Finlay 11.30-13.00 Key Themes I: The history of archaeology and the archaeology of history in Greece (Museum) 13.00-14.00 Buffet Lunch in Dining Room 14.00-15.30 Key Themes II: Ways of approaching archaeological sites (Museum) 15.30-17.00 Key Themes III: Archaeological Science (Fitch) 19.30 BBQ on the Finlay Terrace Tuesday 20 3 07.30-08.30 Breakfast 08.30 The Acropolis (including the interior of the Parthenon) (Lunch – self bought) The south Slope of the Acropolis Wednesday 21 4 07.30-08.30 Breakfast 08.30 The Athenian Agora and Museum The Areopagos, Philopappos Hill, The Pnyx (Lunch – self bought) The Acropolis Museum Thursday 22 5 07.30-08.30 Breakfast 08.30 Kerameikos Library of Hadrian (Lunch – self bought) Roman Agora, Little Metropolis, Arch of Hadrian, Temple of Olympian Zeus Friday 23 6 07.30-08.30 Breakfast 08.30 The National Archaeological Museum I (Mycenaean gallery, Pottery collection) (Lunch – self bought) The National Archaeological Museum II (Sculpture collection) Saturday 24 7 08.00-09.00 Breakfast 09.00 Piraeus Museum FREE AFTERNOON Sunday 25 8 FREE DAY 2 Monday 26 9 07.30-08.30 Breakfast 08.30 BSA Museum Cycladic
    [Show full text]
  • “<> ” Honey Production in Attica, an Antique
    “<> ” honey production in Attica, an antique excellence Autor(es): Bossolino, Isabella Publicado por: Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra; Annablume URL persistente: URI:http://hdl.handle.net/10316.2/39653 DOI: DOI:https://doi.org/10.14195/978-989-26-1191-4_24 Accessed : 4-Oct-2021 14:43:11 A navegação consulta e descarregamento dos títulos inseridos nas Bibliotecas Digitais UC Digitalis, UC Pombalina e UC Impactum, pressupõem a aceitação plena e sem reservas dos Termos e Condições de Uso destas Bibliotecas Digitais, disponíveis em https://digitalis.uc.pt/pt-pt/termos. Conforme exposto nos referidos Termos e Condições de Uso, o descarregamento de títulos de acesso restrito requer uma licença válida de autorização devendo o utilizador aceder ao(s) documento(s) a partir de um endereço de IP da instituição detentora da supramencionada licença. Ao utilizador é apenas permitido o descarregamento para uso pessoal, pelo que o emprego do(s) título(s) descarregado(s) para outro fim, designadamente comercial, carece de autorização do respetivo autor ou editor da obra. Na medida em que todas as obras da UC Digitalis se encontram protegidas pelo Código do Direito de Autor e Direitos Conexos e demais legislação aplicável, toda a cópia, parcial ou total, deste documento, nos casos em que é legalmente admitida, deverá conter ou fazer-se acompanhar por este aviso. pombalina.uc.pt digitalis.uc.pt Série Diaita Joaquim Pinheiro Scripta & Realia Carmen Soares ISSN: 2183-6523 611907 (coords.) Destina-se esta coleção a publicar textos resultantes da investigação de membros do projeto transnacional DIAITA: Património Alimentar da Lusofonia. As obras consistem 789892 em estudos aprofundados e, na maioria das vezes, de carácter interdisciplinar sobre 9 uma temática fundamental para o desenhar de um património e identidade culturais comuns à população falante da língua portuguesa: a história e as culturas da alimentação.
    [Show full text]
  • 21, El. Venizelou Ave., 102 50 ATHENS SECTION Tel.: 2103202049, Fax: 2103226371
    LIST OF BANK BRANCHES (BY HEBIC) 30/06/2015 BANK OF GREECE HEBIC BRANCH NAME AREA ADDRESS TELEPHONE NUMBER / FAX 0100001 HEAD OFFICE SECRETARIAT ATHENS CENTRE 21, El. Venizelou Ave., 102 50 ATHENS SECTION tel.: 2103202049, fax: 2103226371 0100002 HEAD OFFICE TENDER AND ATHENS CENTRE 21, El. Venizelou Ave., 102 50 ATHENS PROCUREMENT SECTION tel.: 2103203473, fax: 2103231691 0100003 HEAD OFFICE HUMAN ATHENS CENTRE 21, El. Venizelou Ave., 102 50 ATHENS RESOURCES SECTION tel.: 2103202090, fax: 2103203961 0100004 HEAD OFFICE DOCUMENT ATHENS CENTRE 21, El. Venizelou Ave., 102 50 ATHENS MANAGEMENT SECTION tel.: 2103202198, fax: 2103236954 0100005 HEAD OFFICE PAYROLL ATHENS CENTRE 21, El. Venizelou Ave., 102 50 ATHENS MANAGEMENT SECTION tel.: 2103202096, fax: 2103236930 0100007 HEAD OFFICE SECURITY ATHENS CENTRE 21, El. Venizelou Ave., 102 50 ATHENS SECTION tel.: 2103202101, fax: 210 3204059 0100008 HEAD OFFICE SYSTEMIC CREDIT ATHENS CENTRE 3, Amerikis, 102 50 ATHENS INSTITUTIONS SUPERVISION SECTION A tel.: 2103205154, fax: …… 0100009 HEAD OFFICE BOOK ENTRY ATHENS CENTRE 21, El. Venizelou Ave., 102 50 ATHENS SECURITIES MANAGEMENT SECTION tel.: 2103202620, fax: 2103235747 0100010 HEAD OFFICE ARCHIVES ATHENS CENTRE 21, El. Venizelou Ave., 102 50 ATHENS SECTION tel.: 2103202206, fax: 2103203950 0100012 HEAD OFFICE RESERVES ATHENS CENTRE 21, El. Venizelou Ave., 102 50 ATHENS MANAGEMENT BACK UP SECTION tel.: 2103203766, fax: 2103220140 0100013 HEAD OFFICE FOREIGN ATHENS CENTRE 21, El. Venizelou Ave., 102 50 ATHENS EXCHANGE TRANSACTIONS SECTION tel.: 2103202895, fax: 2103236746 0100014 HEAD OFFICE SYSTEMIC CREDIT ATHENS CENTRE 3, Amerikis, 102 50 ATHENS INSTITUTIONS SUPERVISION SECTION B tel.: 2103205041, fax: …… 0100015 HEAD OFFICE PAYMENT ATHENS CENTRE 3, Amerikis, 102 50 ATHENS SYSTEMS OVERSIGHT SECTION tel.: 2103205073, fax: …… 0100016 HEAD OFFICE ESCB PROJECTS CHALANDRI 341, Mesogeion Ave., 152 31 CHALANDRI AUDIT SECTION tel.: 2106799743, fax: 2106799713 0100017 HEAD OFFICE DOCUMENTARY ATHENS CENTRE 21, El.
    [Show full text]
  • Registration Certificate
    1 The following information has been supplied by the Greek Aliens Bureau: It is obligatory for all EU nationals to apply for a “Registration Certificate” (Veveosi Engrafis - Βεβαίωση Εγγραφής) after they have spent 3 months in Greece (Directive 2004/38/EC).This requirement also applies to UK nationals during the transition period. This certificate is open- dated. You only need to renew it if your circumstances change e.g. if you had registered as unemployed and you have now found employment. Below we outline some of the required documents for the most common cases. Please refer to the local Police Authorities for information on the regulations for freelancers, domestic employment and students. You should submit your application and required documents at your local Aliens Police (Tmima Allodapon – Τμήμα Αλλοδαπών, for addresses, contact telephone and opening hours see end); if you live outside Athens go to the local police station closest to your residence. In all cases, original documents and photocopies are required. You should approach the Greek Authorities for detailed information on the documents required or further clarification. Please note that some authorities work by appointment and will request that you book an appointment in advance. Required documents in the case of a working person: 1. Valid passport. 2. Two (2) photos. 3. Applicant’s proof of address [a document containing both the applicant’s name and address e.g. photocopy of the house lease, public utility bill (DEH, OTE, EYDAP) or statement from Tax Office (Tax Return)]. If unavailable please see the requirements for hospitality. 4. Photocopy of employment contract.
    [Show full text]
  • The Greek World
    THE GREEK WORLD THE GREEK WORLD Edited by Anton Powell London and New York First published 1995 by Routledge 11 New Fetter Lane, London EC4P 4EE This edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2003. Disclaimer: For copyright reasons, some images in the original version of this book are not available for inclusion in the eBook. Simultaneously published in the USA and Canada by Routledge 29 West 35th Street, New York, NY 10001 First published in paperback 1997 Selection and editorial matter © 1995 Anton Powell, individual chapters © 1995 the contributors All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilized in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Greek World I. Powell, Anton 938 Library of Congress Cataloguing in Publication Data The Greek world/edited by Anton Powell. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. 1. Greece—Civilization—To 146 B.C. 2. Mediterranean Region— Civilization. 3. Greece—Social conditions—To 146 B.C. I. Powell, Anton. DF78.G74 1995 938–dc20 94–41576 ISBN 0-203-04216-6 Master e-book ISBN ISBN 0-203-16276-5 (Adobe eReader Format) ISBN 0-415-06031-1 (hbk) ISBN 0-415-17042-7 (pbk) CONTENTS List of Illustrations vii Notes on Contributors viii List of Abbreviations xii Introduction 1 Anton Powell PART I: THE GREEK MAJORITY 1 Linear
    [Show full text]
  • Cult and Crisis: a GIS Approach to the Sacred Landscape of Hellenistic Attica
    Open Archaeology 2019; 5: 383–395 Original Study Constanze Graml*, Manuel Hunziker, Katharina Vukadin Cult and Crisis: A GIS Approach to the Sacred Landscape of Hellenistic Attica https://doi.org/10.1515/opar-2019-0024 Received February 12, 2019; accepted June 18, 2019 Abstract: From a political point of view, 3rd century BCE Athens represents a shattered unity. Parts of the Athenian countryside and even the city itself were occupied by foreign troops. This loss of control affected the city’s political, economic, social, cultural, and religious life. Since Cleisthenic times, relations between political units and religious communities had become institutionalised through specific cults. Other cult places of relevance to the larger community and therefore with a catchment area that exceeded a deme, e.g. Eleusis, were also affected, as they lay within the occupied territories. This partial inaccessibility of the countryside risked the disruption of religious duties. The project “Cult and Crisis: The Sacred Landscape of Attica and its Correlation to Political Topography” aims to identify potentially affected cult places with no limitations regarding their possible catchment area by analysing their placement in relation to foreign military bases. Alterations in cult practice can plausibly be detected in changes ranging from cessation to the rerouting of ritual movement or the establishment of substitute cult places. As these “solutions” rarely feature in written sources, our GIS-based approach will focus on material remains from sanctuaries. Although an object’s use for ritual practice cannot be deduced with certainty, the distribution of finds certainly attests to human activity. This contribution presents a trial of this approach, taking the Sounion area as its case study.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture 05 Greek Architecture Part 2
    Readings Pages 54-60, A World History of Architecture, Fazio, Michael, Moffet & Wodehousecopoy Pages 60– 65 Great Architecture of the World ARCH 1121 HISTORY OF ARCHITECTURAL TECHNOLOGY Photo: Alexander Aptekar © 2009 Gardner Art Through the Ages Classical Greek Architecture 480 – 431BCE: Known as the Classical Period in Greek History Assertion that human intelligence puts man above the rest of nature Architecture began in the service of religion 7th century BCE – 1st efforts to create proper shapes and design Beauty = Gods Secret of beauty lay in ratios and proportions Invented democracy and philosophy Created works of art in drama, sculpture and architecture Greek Architecture 480 – 431BCE Temples first built with wood, then stone w/ terra cotta tiles Purely formal objects Greeks pursued the beauty through architecture and materials The home of the Gods Became the principal ornaments in the cities, generally on hills or other prominent locations www.greatbuildings.com www.greatbuildings.com Temple of Hephaestus megron Athenian Treasury Classical Orders In classical Greek architecture, beauty lay in systems of the ratios and proportions. A system or order defined the ideal proportions for all the components of the temples according to mathematical ratios – based on the diameter of the columns. What is an order? An order includes the total assemblage of parts consisting of the column and its appropriate entablature which is based on the diameter of the column. Temple of Hera II (Poseidon) 450 BCE The column is vertical and supports the structure. Its diameter sets the proportion of the other parts. The entablature is horizontal and consists of many elements.
    [Show full text]