DOCSLIB.ORG

Produced by Unz.Org Electronic Reproduction Prohibited 468 Fellows

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Produced by Unz.Org Electronic Reproduction Prohibited 468 Fellows •^.,,^^1.1^^ Lj^ii^(iiiffl3J»K-i:^se^* LIST OF THE FELLOWS AND FOREIGN HONOEAEY MEMBEKS. RESIDENT FELLOWS. —194. (Number limited to two liuiidred.) CLASS L — Mathematical and Physical Sciences. — 72. SECTION I. — 6. William P. Dexter, Eoxbury. Mathematics. Amos E. Dolbear, Medford. William E. Byerly, Cambridge. Charles W. Eliot, Cambridge. Moses G. Farmer, Newport. Benjamin A. Gould, Cambridge. Thomas Gaffield, Boston. Gustavus Hay, Boston. Wolcott Gibbs, Cambridge. James M. Peirce, Cambridge. John D. Kunkle, Brookline. Erank A. Gooch, Cambridge. Edwin P. Seaver, Newton. Edwin H. Hall, Cambridge. Henry B. Hill, Cambridge. SECTION II. —13. K". D. C. Hodges, Salem. Practical Astronomy and Geodesy. Silas W. Holman, Boston. J. Ingersoll Bowditoh, Boston. Eben N. Horsford, Cambridge. T. Sterry Hunt, Montreal. Seth C. Chandler, Jr., Cambridge. Charles L. Jackson, Cambridge. Alvan Clark, Cambridgeport. William W. Jacques, Newburyporfc. Alvan G. Clark, Cambridgeport. Leonard P. Kinnicutt, Cambridge. George B. Clark, Cambridgeport. Joseph Levering, Cambridge. John R. Edmands, Cambridge. Charles F. Mabery, Cambridge. Henry Mitchell, Boston. William E. Nichols, Boston. Robert Treat Paine, Brookline. John M. Ordway, Boston. Edward C. Pickering, Cambridge. WilUam H. Pickering, Boston. William. A. Rogers, Cambridge. Robert H. Richards, Boston. Arthur Searle, Cambridge. Edward S. Ritchie, Brookline. Leopold Trouvelot, Cambridge. Stephen P. Sharpies, Cambridge. Henry L. Whiting, Tisbury. Francis H. Storer, Jamaica Plain. SECTION IIL —38. John Trowbridge, Cambridge. Cyrus M. Warren, Brookline. Physics and Chemistry. Charles H. Wing, Boston. A. Graham Bell, Cambridge. Edward S. Wood, Cambridge. Clarence J. Blake, Boston. Francis Blake, Auburndale. SECTION IV. —15. John H. Blake, Boston. Technology and Engineering. Thos. Edwards Clark, WiUiamstown. George R. Baldwin, Woburn. W. 8. Clark, Amherst. John M. Batchelder, Cambridge. Josiah P. Cooke, Cambridge. ChavlesO.Boutelle, Washington,DC. James M. Crafts, Boston. Henry L. Eustis, Cambridge. Charles E. Cross, Boston. James B. Francis, Lowell. PRODUCED BY UNZ.ORG ELECTRONIC REPRODUCTION PROHIBITED 468 FELLOWS. John B. Plenok, Boston. Alfred P. Rockwell, Boston. E. D. Leavitt, Jr., Cambridgeport. Charles S. Storrow, Boston. William R. Lee, Roxbury. WiUiam R. Ware, New York. Frederic W. Lincoln, Boston. WiUiam Watson, Boston. Hiram F. Mills, Lawrence. Morrill Wyman, Cambridge. CLASS IL — Natural and Physiological Sciences. •60. SECTION I. — 8. Hermann A. Hagen, Cambridge. Geology, Mineralogy, and Physics of Charles E. Hamlin, Cambridge. Alpheus Hyatt, the Olobe. Boston. Samuel Kneeland, Boston. Thomas T. Bouve, Boston. Theodore Lyman, Brookline. William T. Brigham, Boston. Charles S. Minot, Boston. Algernon Coolidge, Boston. Edward S. Morse, Salem. WiUiam O. Crosby, Boston. James J. Putnam, Boston. Jules Marcou, Cambridge. Samuel H. Scudder, Cambridge. William H. Niles, Cambridge. D. Humphreys Storer, Boston. Nathaniel S. Shaler, Cambridge. Henry Wheatland, Salem. Charles U. Shepard, Amherst. James C. White, Boston. SECTION IL — 8. SECTION IV. 22. Botany. Medicine and Surgery. Samuel L. Abbot, Boston. Wilham G. Farlow, Cambridge. Henry J. Bigelow, Boston. George L. Goodale, Cambridge. Henry I. Bowditch, Boston. Asa Gray, Cambridge. H. H. Hunnewell, Wellesley. Benjamin E. Cotting Roxbury. Charles S. Sargent, Brookline. Frank W. Draper, Boston. Charles J. Sprague, Boston. Thomas Dwight, Boston. Edward Tuckermau, Amherst. Robert T. Edes, Boston. Sereno Watson, Cambridge. Calvin Ellis, Boston. Charles F. Folsom, Boston. SECTION IIL —22. Richard M. Hodges, Boston. Oliver W. Holmes, Boston. Zoology and Physu Robert W. Hooper, Boston. Ales. E. B. Agassiz, Cambridge. Alfred Hosmer, Watertown. Joel A. Allen, Cambridge. Edward Jarvis, Dorchester. Robert Amory, Brookline. Francis Minot, Boston. Nath. E. Atwood, Provincetown. John P. Reynolds, Boston. James M. Barnard, Boston. Wm. L. Richardson, Boston. Henry P. Bowditoh, Boston. George C. Shattuok, Boston. Edward Burgess, Boston. J. Baxter Upham, Boston. Samuel Cabot, Boston. Charles E. Ware, Boston. John Dean, Waltham. John C. Warren, Boston. Walter Faxon, Cambridge. Henry W. Williams, Boston. PRODUCED BY UNZ.ORG ELECTRONIC REPRODUCTION PROHIBITED FELLOWS. 469 CLASS III. — Moral and Political Sciences. — 62. SECTION I. —14. SECTION HI. —19. Philosophy and Jwisprudence. Political Economy and History. James B. Ames, Cambridge. Charles S. Bradley, Providence. Chas. P. Adams, Jr., Quincy. Phillips Brooks, Boston. Henry Adams, Boston. James F. Clarke, Jamaica PL Edward Atkinson, Boston. Charles C. Everett, Cambridge. John Cummings, Woburn. Horace Gray, Boston. Charles Deane, Cambridge. John C. Gray, Boston. Charles F. Dunbar, Cambridge. Laurens P. Hickock, Northampton. Samuel Eliot, Boston. Oliver W. Holmes, Jr., Boston. George E. Ellis, Boston. Mark Hopkins, Williamstown. Edwin L. Godkin, New York. C. C. Langdell, Cambridge. William Gray, Boston. John Lowell, Newton. Edward Everett Hale, Boston. Henry W. Paine, Cambridge. Henry P. Kidder, Boston. James B. Thayer, Cambridge. Henry C. Lodge, Boston. Francis Parkman, Boston. Andrew P. Peabody, Cambridge. Joseph S. Ropes, SECTION H. —18. Boston. Henry W. Torrey, Cambridge. Philology and Archceology. Francis A. Walker, Boston. Robert C. Winthrop, Ezra Abbot, Cambridge. Boston. William S. Appleton, Boston. William P. Atkinson, Boston. Luoien Carr, Cambridge. SECTION IV. —11. Henry G. Denny, Boston. Epes S. Dixwell, Cambridge. Literature and the Fine Arts. William Everett, Quincy. WilKam W. Goodwin, Cambridge. Charles F. Adams, Boston. Ephraim W. Gm-ney, Cambridge. George S. Boutwell, Groton. Henry W. Haynes, Boston. J. EUiot Cabot, Brookline. Charles R. Lanman, Cambridge. Francis J. Child, Cambridge. Bennett H. Nash, Boston. Charles G. Loring, Boston. Frederick W. Putnam , Cambridge. James Russell Lowell, Cambridge. John L. Sibley, Cambridge. Charles Eliot Norton, Cambridge. E. A. Sophocles, Cambridge. Thomas W. Parsons, Wayland. John W. White, Cambridge. Charles C. Perkins, Boston. Justin Winsor, Cambridge. H. H. Richardson, Brookline. Edward J. Young, Cambridge. John G. Whittier, Amesbury. PRODUCED BY UNZ.ORG ELECTRONIC REPRODUCTION PROHIBITED 470 ASSOCIATE FELLOWS. ASSOCIATE FELLOWS.— 90, (Number limited to one hundred.) CLASS L — Mathematical and Physical Sciences. — 36. SECTION I.— 7. SECTION HI. —11. Mathematics. Physics and Chemistry. E. B. EUiott, Washmgton,D.C. William Ferrel, Wasliington,D.C. F. A. P. Barnard, New York. Thomas Hill, Portland, Me. J.WillardGibbs, New Haven,Conn. SimonNewcomb, Washington,D.C. S. W. Johnson, New Haven, Conn. H. A. Newton, New Haven, Conn. John Le Conte, Berkeley, Cal. James E. Oliver, Ithaca, N.Y. A. M. Mayer, Hoboken, N.J. T. H. Saflord, Williamstown, Mass. W. A. Norton, New Haven, Conn. Ogden N. Rood, New York. SECTION H. —13. H. A. Rowland, Baltimore. Practical Astronomy and Geodesy. L.M. Rutherfurd, New York. Benj. Silliman, New Haven, Conn. S. Alexander, Princeton, N.J. J. L. Smith, Louisville, Ky. W.H.C.Bartlett, Yonkers, N.Y. J. H.C. Coffin, Washington,D.C. Wm. H. Emory, Washington,D.C. Asaph Hall, Washington,D.C. SECTION IV. — 5. J. E. Hilgard, WasMngton,D.C. George W. Hill, Nyack, N.Y. Technology and Engineering. Sam. P. Langley, Allegheny, Pa. Elias Loomis, New Haven, Conn. Henry L. Abbot, New York. Maria Mitchell, Poughkeepsie, N. Y. A.A.Humphreys, Washington,D.C. C. H. F. Peters, Clinton, N.Y. William Sellers, Philadelphia. George M. Searle, New York. George Talcott, Albany, N.Y. Chas. A. Young, Princeton, N.J. W.P.Trowbridge,New Haven,Conn. CLASS IL — Natural and Physiological Sciences. — 28. SECTION I. —13. Arnold Guyot, Princeton, N.J. Geology, Mineralogy, and Physics of James Hall, Albany, N.Y. the Globe. F. S. Holmes, Charleston, S.C. George J. Brush, New Haven, Conn. Clarence King, Washington, D. C. James D. Dana, New Haven, Conn. Joseph Le Conte, Berkeley, Cal. J.W.Dawson, Montreal, Canada. J. Peter Lesley, Philadelphia. .T. C. Fremont, New York. R. Pumpelly, Newport, R.I. F. A. Genth, Philadelphia. Geo. C. Swallow, Columbia, Mo. PRODUCED BY UNZ.ORG ELECTRONIC REPRODUCTION PROHIBITED ASSOCIATE FELLOWS. 471 SECTION II. — 3. Joseph Leidy, Philadelphia. Botany. O. C. Marsh, New Haven, Conn. S. Weir Mitchell, Philadelphia. A. W. Chapman, Apalaohieola, Pla. A. S. Packard, Jr., Providence. G. Engelmann, St. Louis, Mo. Leo Lesquereux, Columbus, Ohio. SECTION IV. — 5. Medicine and Surgery. SECTION III.—7. Fordyce Barker, New York. Zoology and Physiology. John S. Billings, Washington, D.C. S. F. Baird, Washington, D.C. Jacob M. Da Costa, Philadelphia. J. C. Dalton, New York. W.A.Hammond, New York. J. L. Le Conte, Philadelphia. Alfred Stille', Philadelphia. CLASS III. — Moral and Political Sciences.— 26. SECTION I. — 7. W. D. Whitney, New Haven,Conn. T. D. Woolsey, New Haven,Conn. PMlosopliy and Jurisprudence. D. E. Goodwin, Philadelphia. SECTION III.—6. R. G. Hazard, Peacedale, R.I. Nathaniel Holmes, St. Louis, Mo. Political Economy and History, James McCosh, Princeton, N.J. George Bancroft, Washington, D.C, Charles S. Peirce, New York. S. G. Brown, Hanover, N.H. Noah Porter, New Haven, Conn. Henry C. Lea, Philadelphia. Jeremiah Smith, Dover, N.H. J. H. Trumbull, Hartford, Conn. M. F. Force, Cincinnati. W. G. Sumner, New Haven, Conn. SECTION II.—8. Philology and Archmology. SECTION IV. — 5. Literature and the Fine Arts. A. N. Arnold, Pawtuxet, R.I. D. C. Gilman, Baltimore. James B. Angell, Ann Arbor, Mich. A. C. Kendriek, Rochester, N.Y. L. P. di Cesnola, New
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Nietzsche and Eternal Recurrence: Methods, Archives, History, and Genesis
    University of South Florida Scholar Commons Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate School April 2021 Nietzsche and Eternal Recurrence: Methods, Archives, History, and Genesis William A. B. Parkhurst University of South Florida Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd Part of the Philosophy Commons Scholar Commons Citation Parkhurst, William A. B., "Nietzsche and Eternal Recurrence: Methods, Archives, History, and Genesis" (2021). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/8839 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Nietzsche and Eternal Recurrence: Methods, Archives, History, and Genesis by William A. B. Parkhurst A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the Doctor of Philosophy in Philosophy Department of Philosophy College of Arts and Sciences University of South Florida Major Professor: Joshua Rayman, Ph.D. Lee Braver, Ph.D. Vanessa Lemm, Ph.D. Alex Levine, Ph.D. Date of Approval: February 16th, 2021 Keywords: Fredrich Nietzsche, Eternal Recurrence, History of Philosophy, Continental Philosophy Copyright © 2021, William A. B. Parkhurst Dedication I dedicate this dissertation to my mother, Carol Hyatt Parkhurst (RIP), who always believed in my education even when I did not. I am also deeply grateful for the support of my father, Peter Parkhurst, whose support in varying avenues of life was unwavering. I am also deeply grateful to April Dawn Smith. It was only with her help wandering around library basements that I first found genetic forms of diplomatic transcription.
    [Show full text]
  • The Glarus Alps, Knowledge Validation, and the Genealogical Organization of Nineteenth-Century Swiss Alpine Geognosy
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by RERO DOC Digital Library Science in Context 22(3), 439–461 (2009). Copyright C Cambridge University Press doi:10.1017/S0269889709990081 Printed in the United Kingdom Inherited Territories: The Glarus Alps, Knowledge Validation, and the Genealogical Organization of Nineteenth-Century Swiss Alpine Geognosy Andrea Westermann Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Zurich Argument The article examines the organizational patterns of nineteenth-century Swiss Alpine geology. It argues that early and middle nineteenth-century Swiss geognosy was shaped in genealogical terms and that the patterns of genealogical reasoning and practice worked as a vehicle of transmission toward the generalization of locally gained empirical knowledge. The case study is provided by the Zurich geologist Albert Heim, who, in the early 1870s, blended intellectual and patrilineal genealogies that connected two generations of fathers and sons: Hans Conrad and Arnold Escher, Albert and Arnold Heim. Two things were transmitted from one generation to the next, a domain of geognostic research, the Glarus Alps, and a research interest in an explanation of the massive geognostic anomalies observed there. The legacy found its embodiment in the Escher family archive. The genealogical logic became visible and then experienced a crisis when, later in the century, the focus of Alpine geology shifted from geognosy to tectonics. Tectonic research loosened the traditional link between the intimate knowledge of a territory and the generalization from empirical data. 1. Introduction In 1878, Albert Heim (1849–1937) published a monograph on the anatomy of folds and the related mechanisms of mountain building based on what he had observed in the Glarus district of Mounts Todi¨ and Windgallen,¨ an area where, in today’s calculation, rocks aged between 250 and 300 million years overlie much younger rocks aged about 50 million years.
    [Show full text]
  • Georg Von Der Gabelentz the Published Version of This Article Is In
    Georg von der Gabelentz The published version of this article is in the Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics: http://linguistics.oxfordre.com/abstract/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.001.0001/acrefore- 9780199384655-e-379 James McElvenny [email protected] Summary The German sinologist and general linguist Georg von der Gabelentz (1840–1893) occupies an interesting place at the intersection of several streams of linguistic scholarship at the end of the nineteenth century. As Professor of East-Asian languages at the University of Leipzig from 1878 to 1889 and then Professor for Sinology and General Linguistics at the University of Berlin from 1889 until his death, Gabelentz was present at some of the main centers of linguistics at the time. He was, however, generally critical of mainstream historical-comparative linguistics as propagated by the neogrammarians and instead emphasized approaches to language inspired by a line of researchers including Wilhelm von Humboldt (1767–1835), H. Steinthal (1823–1899), and his own father, Hans Conon von der Gabelentz (1807–1874). Today Gabelentz is chiefly remembered for several theoretical and methodological innovations which continue to play a role in linguistics. Most significant among these are his contributions to cross-linguistic syntactic comparison and typology, grammar-writing, and grammaticalization. His earliest linguistic work emphasized the importance of syntax as a core part of grammar and sought to establish a framework for the cross-linguistic description of word order, as had already been attempted for morphology by other scholars. The importance he attached to syntax was motivated by his engagement with Classical Chinese, a language almost devoid of morphology and highly reliant on syntax.
    [Show full text]
  • Author BC AD ACHILLES TATIUS 500? Acts of Paul and Thecla, of Pilate, of Thomas, of Peter and Paul, of Barnabas, Etc
    Author BC AD ACHILLES TATIUS 500? Acts of Paul and Thecla, of Pilate, of Thomas, of Peter and Paul, of Barnabas, etc. at the earliest from 2d cent. on AELIAN c. 180 AESCHINES 345 AESCHYLUS *525, †456 AESOP 1 570 AETIUS c. 500 AGATHARCHIDES 117? ALCAEUS MYTILENAEUS 610 ALCIPHRON 200? ALCMAN 610 ALEXIS 350 AMBROSE, Bp. of Milan 374 AMMIANUS MARCELLINUS †c. 400 AMMONIUS, the grammarian 390 ANACREON2 530 ANAXANDRIDES 350 ANAXIMANDER 580 ANDOCIDES 405 ANTIPHANES 380 ANTIPHON 412 ANTONINUS, M. AURELIUS †180 APOLLODORUS of Athens 140 APOLLONIUS DYSCOLUS 140 APOLLONIUS RHODIUS 200 APPIAN 150 APPULEIUS 160 AQUILA (translator of the O. T.) 2d cent. (under Hadrian.) ARATUS 270 ARCHILOCHUS 700 ARCHIMEDES, the mathematician 250 ARCHYTAS c. 400 1 But the current Fables are not his; on the History of Greek Fable, see Rutherford, Babrius, Introd. ch. ii. 2 Only a few fragments of the odes ascribed to him are genuine. ARETAEUS 80? ARISTAENETUS 450? ARISTEAS3 270 ARISTIDES, P. AELIUS 160 ARISTOPHANES *444, †380 ARISTOPHANES, the grammarian 200 ARISTOTLE *384, †322 ARRIAN (pupil and friend of Epictetus) *c. 100 ARTEMIDORUS DALDIANUS (oneirocritica) 160 ATHANASIUS †373 ATHENAEUS, the grammarian 228 ATHENAGORUS of Athens 177? AUGUSTINE, Bp. of Hippo †430 AUSONIUS, DECIMUS MAGNUS †c. 390 BABRIUS (see Rutherford, Babrius, Intr. ch. i.) (some say 50?) c. 225 BARNABAS, Epistle written c. 100? Baruch, Apocryphal Book of c. 75? Basilica, the4 c. 900 BASIL THE GREAT, Bp. of Caesarea †379 BASIL of Seleucia 450 Bel and the Dragon 2nd cent.? BION 200 CAESAR, GAIUS JULIUS †March 15, 44 CALLIMACHUS 260 Canons and Constitutions, Apostolic 3rd and 4th cent.
    [Show full text]
  • James Hutton's Reputation Among Geologists in the Late Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries
    The Geological Society of America Memoir 216 Revising the Revisions: James Hutton’s Reputation among Geologists in the Late Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries A. M. Celâl Şengör* İTÜ Avrasya Yerbilimleri Enstitüsü ve Maden Fakültesi, Jeoloji Bölümü, Ayazağa 34469 İstanbul, Turkey ABSTRACT A recent fad in the historiography of geology is to consider the Scottish polymath James Hutton’s Theory of the Earth the last of the “theories of the earth” genre of publications that had begun developing in the seventeenth century and to regard it as something behind the times already in the late eighteenth century and which was subsequently remembered only because some later geologists, particularly Hutton’s countryman Sir Archibald Geikie, found it convenient to represent it as a precursor of the prevailing opinions of the day. By contrast, the available documentation, pub- lished and unpublished, shows that Hutton’s theory was considered as something completely new by his contemporaries, very different from anything that preceded it, whether they agreed with him or not, and that it was widely discussed both in his own country and abroad—from St. Petersburg through Europe to New York. By the end of the third decade in the nineteenth century, many very respectable geologists began seeing in him “the father of modern geology” even before Sir Archibald was born (in 1835). Before long, even popular books on geology and general encyclopedias began spreading the same conviction. A review of the geological literature of the late eighteenth and the nineteenth centuries shows that Hutton was not only remembered, but his ideas were in fact considered part of the current science and discussed accord- ingly.
    [Show full text]
  • La Filología, La Lingüística Y Las Leyes De La Evolución
    Ennis, Juan Antonio La filología, la lingüística y las leyes de la evolución. Curtius y Brugmann, lindes y deslindes Revista argentina de historiografía lingüística 2018, vol. 10, nro. 2, p. 93-105 Ennis, J. (2018). La filología, la lingüística y las leyes de la evolución. Curtius y Brugmann, lindes y deslindes. Revista argentina de historiografía lingüística, 10 (2), 93-105. En Memoria Académica. Disponible en: http://www.memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar/art_revistas/pr.11606/pr.11606.pdf Información adicional en www.memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar Esta obra está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Revista argentina de historiografía lingüística, X, 2, 93-105, 2018 La filología, la lingüística y las leyes de la evolución. Curtius y Brugmann, lindes y deslindes Philology, linguistics and the laws of evolution. Curtius and Brugmann, boundaries and demarcations Juan Antonio Ennis∗ IdIHCS, UNLP-CONICET Abstract In this paper we provide an introduction to the two German texts translated for this issue of RAHL. These are two interventions by Georg Curtius and Karl Brugmann, dated in 1862 and 1885 respectively, both devoted to dealing with the complex relationship between philology and linguistics. To do so, we first sketch a review of different features of the discussion on the relationship between both disciplines throughout the 19th century in the German-speaking academic space. Then, we present some basic issues that should contribute to situate the texts in their own context. Key words: Georg Curtius, Karl Brugmann, Philology, Linguistics, Neogrammarians. Resumen Se ofrece aquí una introducción a los dos textos cuya traducción se ofrece en este mismo número, sendas intervenciones de Georg Curtius y Karl Brugmann sobre la relación entre la filología y la lingüística, de 1862 y 1885 respectivamente.
    [Show full text]
  • Die Gründung Der Schweizerischen Geologischen Gesellschaft Und Ihre Seitherige Entwicklung
    Die Gründung der Schweizerischen Geologischen Gesellschaft und ihre seitherige Entwicklung Autor(en): Nabholz, Walter K. Objekttyp: Article Zeitschrift: Eclogae Geologicae Helvetiae Band (Jahr): 76 (1983) Heft 1: Zentenarfeier der Schweizerischen Geologischen Gesellschaft PDF erstellt am: 06.10.2021 Persistenter Link: http://doi.org/10.5169/seals-165350 Nutzungsbedingungen Die ETH-Bibliothek ist Anbieterin der digitalisierten Zeitschriften. Sie besitzt keine Urheberrechte an den Inhalten der Zeitschriften. Die Rechte liegen in der Regel bei den Herausgebern. Die auf der Plattform e-periodica veröffentlichten Dokumente stehen für nicht-kommerzielle Zwecke in Lehre und Forschung sowie für die private Nutzung frei zur Verfügung. Einzelne Dateien oder Ausdrucke aus diesem Angebot können zusammen mit diesen Nutzungsbedingungen und den korrekten Herkunftsbezeichnungen weitergegeben werden. Das Veröffentlichen von Bildern in Print- und Online-Publikationen ist nur mit vorheriger Genehmigung der Rechteinhaber erlaubt. Die systematische Speicherung von Teilen des elektronischen Angebots auf anderen Servern bedarf ebenfalls des schriftlichen Einverständnisses der Rechteinhaber. Haftungsausschluss Alle Angaben erfolgen ohne Gewähr für Vollständigkeit oder Richtigkeit. Es wird keine Haftung übernommen für Schäden durch die Verwendung von Informationen aus diesem Online-Angebot oder durch das Fehlen von Informationen. Dies gilt auch für Inhalte Dritter, die über dieses Angebot zugänglich sind. Ein Dienst der ETH-Bibliothek ETH Zürich, Rämistrasse 101, 8092 Zürich, Schweiz, www.library.ethz.ch http://www.e-periodica.ch Eclogae geol. Helv. Vol. 76/1 Seiten 33-45 4 Textfiguren Basel. März 1983 Die Gründung der Schweizerischen Geologischen Gesellschaft und ihre seitherige Entwicklung Von Walter K. Nabholz1) Als Lukas Hauber 1973-1976 Präsident unserer Gesellschaft war. bat er mich, auf die Hundertjahrfeier hin eine Geschichte unserer Gesellschaft zu schreiben.
    [Show full text]
  • The Philological Apparatus: Science, Text, and Nation in the Nineteenth Century,’ Critical Inquiry 47, No
    NOTE: This item is the archived peer-reviewed author-version of Paul Michael Kurtz, ‘The Philological Apparatus: Science, Text, and Nation in the Nineteenth Century,’ Critical Inquiry 47, no. 4 (2021): 747– 76. The Philological Apparatus: Science, Text, and Nation in the Nineteenth Century Paul Michael Kurtz* Abstract Philology haunts the humanities, through both its defendants and its detractors. This article examines the construction of philology as the premier science of the long nineteenth century in Europe. It aims to bring the history of philology up to date by taking it seriously as a science and giving it the kind of treatment that has dominated the history of science for the last generation: to reveal how practices, instruments, and cooperation create illusions of timeless knowledge. This historical inquiry therefore asks how one modality of text interpretation could morph into an integrated complex of knowledge production, which ostensibly explained the whole human world. Ultimately, it advances a central argument: philology operated as a relational system, one that concealed diversity and disunity, projected unity and stability, and seemed to rise above the material conditions of its own making. The essay scrutinizes the composition of philology as a heterogeneous ensemble, the functioning of philology comparable to other sciences, whether human or natural, and the historical contingency in the consolidation of philology. * For critical engagement, I am indebted to Ankur Barua, Marieke Dhont, Simon Goldhill, Nathan MacDonald, Harald Samuel, Emiliano Urciuoli, and Rebecca Van Hove—but Bernard Geoghegan most of all. Valuable suggestions also came from the editorial board of CI. Earlier drafts of this essay were workshopped at “Biblical Scholarship and Theology in the Nineteenth Century,” a seminar hosted in CRASSH at the University of Cambridge, and at “Discipline Formation in the Modern Human Sciences,” a colloquium organized by the Sarton Centre for History of Science at Ghent University.
    [Show full text]
  • Download (760Kb)
    b u b UNIVERSITAT BERN UNIVERSITY LIBRARY OF BERNE Special exhibition: July 10, 2007 Cartography over the last 1200 years: Treasures of the Burghers' Library of Berne and the University Library of Berne Treasures of the University Library of Berne | downloaded: 6.10.2021 https://doi.org/10.7892/boris.57711 22nd International Conference on the History of Cartography source: Berne, July 8-13, 2007 Cover illustration Detail of the working plan for the stuccowork by Lorenz Schmid in the Library Hall at the Central Library, 1792 (Location: Burghers' Library Berne). Access to maps, globes and measuring instruments was also included in the plans for the Library Hall. Library Hall The decisive breakthrough leading to the conversion of the Central Library came in 1784. By virtue of his post [Stiftschaffner], Johann Friedrich von Ryhiner (1732-1803) oversaw the Hohe Schule (the forerunner of Berne University) and the Library. The Library was equipped with an anteroom (today the Hallersaal at the Burghers' Library) and a Library Hall (today the Schultheissen Room at the Central Library), which was ready for use in 1794. The portraits of former Schultheissen or mayors, which gave the room its name, were not.transferred to the Library until 1857. The Library Hall in Berne, which is of the type known as a gallery library, has a restrained elegance on account of its narrow width and the lighting from both sides. The ceiling painting by lgnaz Franz Keil (ea. 1744-1814), dated 1789, shows the coronation of Minerva by Apollo. The seven liberal arts are gathered on Mount Parnassus: astronomy (Ptolemy), music (Tubal­ Cain), geometry (Euclid), arithmetic (Pythagoras), rhetoric (Cicero), dialectics (Aristotle) and grammar (Priscian).
    [Show full text]
  • Bir Bilim Adamının Serüveni "Celâl Şengör Kimbı" Söyleşi: Sefa Kaplan
    bir bilim adamının serüveni "Celâl Şengör Kimbı" Söyleşi: Sefa Kaplan TÜRKİYE ^BANKASI Genel Yayın: 2024 sefa kaplan 1956’da doğdu. İlk ve orta öğrenimini Samsun, Konya, Urfa ve Ankara’da tamamladı. Gazi Eğitim Enstitüsü Türkçe Bölümü’nü bitirdi. Aynı yıl İstanbul Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Türk Dili ve Edebiyatı Bölümü’ne girdi. Fakülteyi son sınıfta, Elazığ’da başlayıp İstanbul’da sürdürdüğü öğretmenliği ise 1984’te bırakıp gazeteciliğe ilk adımını attı. Aralarında N okta ve A ktüel’in de yer aldığı çeşitli yayın organlarında çalıştı. 1995 ile 2000 yılları arasında Londra’da yaşadı. Yağmur Gökhan, İlteriş Özhan ve İren Özlem’in babası. Halen Hürriyet gazetesinde görev yapıyor. İlk şiirleri 1978’de Türk Edebiyatı dergisinde yayımlandı. KİTAPLARI: ŞİİR: Sürgün Sevdaları (1984), İnsan Bir Yalnızlıktır (1990, Behçet Necatigil Şiir Ödülü), Seferberlik Şiirleri (1994), Disconnectus Erectus 2+1 (1995), Londra Şiirleri (2001), Mecûsi Şiirleri (2003) d ü z y a z i: Tarih Tereddütten İbarettir (1990), Yahya Kemal Beyatlı (Seçmeler, 1994), Kemal Derviş, Bir Kurtarıcı Öyküsü (2002), İyi Okuma, Sürdürülebilir Bir Eleştiri Teorisi Üzerine Pratik Metinler (2002), Derviş’in Siyaseti, Siyasetin Dervişi (2003), Öyküler Seni Söyler (2003), 19lS’te Ne Oldu ? (2005), Batılı Gezginlerin Gözüyle İstanbul (2005), 99 Sayfada İstanbul Depremi (Prof. Celâl Şengör ile birlikte, 2006) NEHİR SÖYLEŞİ - 42 - BtR BtLtM ADAMININ SERÜVENİ CELÂL ŞENGÖR KİTABI SÖYLEŞİ SEFA KAl’I-AN ©TÜRKİYE İŞ BANKASI KÜLTÜR YAYINLARI, 2010 Sertifika No: 11213 DİZİ EDİTÖRÜ LEVENT CİN EMRE GÖRSEL YÖNETMEN BİROI. BAYRAM düzei.ti/dİzin ŞÖHRET BAI.TAŞ GRAFİK TASARIM UYGULAMA TÜRKÎYE iş BANKASI KÜLTÜR YAYINLARI I. BASKI: EKİM lOIO ISBN 978-605-360-004-6 BASKI YAYLACIK MATBAACILIK LİTROS YOLU FATİH SANAYİ SİTESİ NO: 11/197-103 TOPKAPI İSTANBUL (0212)612 58 60 Sertifika No: 11931 Bu kitabın tüm yayın haklan saklıdır.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    Table of Contents John F. Thie Remembering Wellness in Touch For HealthlKinesiology 1 Jenni Beasley Advanced Kinesiology Centres Educating Alternatives 27 Paul Dennison Educational Kinesiology 34 Bruce A. 1. Dewe Professional Kinesiology Practitioner Certification 40 Joan. R. Dewe Programme Carl Ferreri Neural Organization Technique 47 Kerryn Franks The Multi Dimensional Healing Model using 50 Transformational Kinesiology Charles Krebs The Learning Enhancement Advanced Program 58 Philip Maffetone What is Applied Kinesiology? 89 Philip Mafferone Sports Kinesiology: The Use of Complementary 92 Sports Medicine Philip Rafferty Kinergetics: Kinesiology and Healing Energy Workshops 109 Wlter Schmitt, Jr. Heart-Focused Principles and Techniques 126 Jimmy Scott The Health Kinesiology System 133 Rosmarie Sonderegger Integrative Kinesiologie 149 Bernhard Studer Gordon Stokes Three In One Concepts 156 Wayne Topping Wellness Kinesiology 165 Richard Utt The Applied Physiology Approach 180 William Whisenant Psychological Kinesiology: Changing the Body's Beliefs 198 All materiiilSconUUned hereiri are-copynght © 1g-98, 1999 by the authors and the Touch for Health Kinesiology Association. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the authors. REMEMBERING WELLNESS IN TOUCH FOR HEALTHIKINESIOLOGY A History, Context And Vision For Touch For Health, the First 25 Years And The Next Millennium By JOHN F TIDE D.C. We are celebrating the 25th anniversary of the better life. Our concepts of Wellness integrate the publication of the Touch For Health manual holistic world view of the East, as well as the and over 30 years of growth, transition, vitalistic tradition in the West as espoused in the branching out, and reintegration.
    [Show full text]
  • Charles Lyell Talks About, Reads About, and Looks at Loess Ian Smalley, Holger Kels, Tivadar Gaudenyi, Mladjen Jovanovic
    Loess encounters of three kinds: Charles Lyell talks about, reads about, and looks at loess Ian Smalley, Holger Kels, Tivadar Gaudenyi, Mladjen Jovanovic Geologos 22, 1 (2016): 71–77 doi: 10.1515/logos-2016-0006 Loess encounters of three kinds: Charles Lyell talks about, reads about, and looks at loess Ian Smalley1,*, Holger Kels2, Tivadar Gaudenyi3, Mladjen Jovanovic4 1Giotto Loess Research Group, Geography Department, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK, e-mail: [email protected] 2Geography Department, RWTH Aachen University, Templergragen 55, 52056 Aachen, Germany, e-mail: [email protected] 3Geographical Institute ‘Jovan Cvijic’, Serbian Academy of Sciences & Arts, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia, e-mail: [email protected] 4Physical Geography, Faculty of Sciences, University of Novi Sad, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia, e-mail: [email protected] *corresponding author Abstract Charles Lyell (1797–1875) was an important loess pioneer. His major contribution was to distribute information on the nature and existence of loess via his influential book ‘The Principles of Geology’. He was obviously impressed by loess when he encountered it; the initial encounter can be split into three phases: conversations about loess; confronting the actual material in the field; and reading about loess in the literature. Detail can be added to an important phase in the scientific development of the study of loess. Significant events include conversations with Hibbert in 1831, conversa- tions and explorations with von Leonhard and Bronn in 1832, the opportunity to include a section on loess in vol. 3 of ‘Principles’ for publication in 1833, a substantial Rhineland excursion in 1833, the reporting of the results of this excur- sion in 1834, discussions at the German Association for the Advancement of Science meeting in Bonn in 1835.
    [Show full text]