DOCSLIB.ORG

Dependencies. on the Syntax of Prolepsis and Relativization in (Swiss) German and Beyond Studies in Generative Grammar

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Dependencies. on the Syntax of Prolepsis and Relativization in (Swiss) German and Beyond Studies in Generative Grammar Martin Salzmann Reconstruction and Resumption in Indirect Aὔ-dependencies. On the Syntax of Prolepsis and Relativization in (Swiss) German and beyond Studies in Generative Grammar Ê Editor in Chief Norbert Corver Volume 117 Martin Salzmann Reconstruction and Resumption in Indirect Aὔ-dependencies. On the Syntax of Prolepsis and Relativization in (Swiss) German and beyond Ê ISBN 978-1-61451-291-2 e-ISBN (PDF) 978-1-61451-220-2 ISSN 0179-0986 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data A CIP catalog record for this book has been applied for at the Library of Congress. Bibliographic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data are available on the Internet at http://dnb.dnb.de. © 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston ♾ Printed on acid-free paper Printed in Germany www.degruyter.com Ê to my mother Preface This book has a long history. The first crucial observation goes back to a tuto- rial I gave at the University of Zurich around 2000 when we noticed that there was a matching eect in Swiss German resumptive relativization. At that time this was just a curious (but surprisingly clear) fact whose theoretical implications I wouldn’t be able to grasp until much later. I returned to relative clauses during my time as a PhD student at the University of Leiden. After finishing the first year without having found a PhD topic and starting to feel a bit uncomfortable, I for- tunately recalled the observation I had made on matching in resumption back as an MA student and started working on Swiss German relatives. Over time, further aspects of relativization came into focus, including what I termed resumptive pro- lepsis (a term that so far has had, well, moderate success) and finally reconstruc- tion eects more generally. To my big surprise, what had started out as work on isolated puzzles suddenly formed a (largely) coherent story about aspects of rel- ativization in (Swiss) German. The thesis appeared as Salzmann (2006a). Master- ing the challenging topics and finishing the thesis on time would not have been possible without the stimulating environment provided by the Leiden University Centre for Linguistics. I am particularly indebted to my supervisors Lisa Cheng and Johan Rooryck whose input greatly shaped and advanced my ideas and who helped me become a proper theoretical linguist. Their support and supervision was exceptional and exemplary. I still happily (and nostalgically) recall the num- berless inspiring discussions we had. In addition, I was lucky to be part of a so- cially as well as intellectually extremely vivid department. Working door to door with people you could always discuss your pressing syntax problems with was a great privilege. The dynamic linguistic community in the Netherlands and the national graduate school of linguistics (LOT), finally, provided further welcome opportunities to interact with exciting syntacticians from all over the world. Several of the topics addressed in my 2006 book were inspired by Henk van Riemsdijk’s work, who was also the external reviewer of my dissertation. I have enormously profited from his vast knowledge of syntax as well as his incredibly subtle insights into the grammar of Swiss German. He has always been very gen- erous in sharing his time and ideas with me – way beyond the call of duty – and it was also Henk, who oered me to publish my dissertation in revised form in the SGG series. I am immensely grateful for his support over these many years, and I am sure that his work will continue to be a rich source of inspiration for the rest of my career. Since my life became somewhat unsteady after my PhD with many dierent jobs in dierent places, the plan to revise the dissertation had to be postponed. DOI 10.1515/9781614512202-202 VIII Ë Preface It was only after I came to the University of Leipzig with the perspective of fi- nally spending several years at the same place that I managed to return to rela- tive clauses. However, since so many years had passed, simply updating my 2006- dissertation was not a realistic option. The field had advanced significantly in the meantime, and the literature on relative clauses had grown at such a fast pace that it quickly became clear that large parts of the book would have to be com- pletely new. An important motivation to finally tackle the book was exciting joint work with Doreen Georgi on Case attraction that started around 2013 and provided the fresh ideas that one needs when returning to a topic one has already spent so much energy and time on. While the phenomena discussed in this book are still largely the same as in 2006, my theoretical perspective on them has been refined and significantly developed in several areas; furthermore, the book has become empirically richer. This is most visible in chapters two, three, and five. The first draft of the book was mainly written in 2015, partly in Leipzig, and partly in Paris, where I spent the academic year 2015/2016. Not having to teach for an entire year was surely instrumental in allowing me to write a first version within relatively lit- tle time. After positive evaluation, I completed the final manuscript in the winter semester 2016/2017 in Leipzig. Being part of Gereon Müller’s vibrant group is one of the most exquisite intellectual privileges our field has to oer, and the many incredibly sharp people around me have crucially pushed me to develop more for- mal and explicit analyses. Since this book partly discusses phenomena that had not been addressed in much detail before and generally involve a high degree of complexity and subtlety, it was crucial to be able to rely on a large number of patient informants whose help is hereby gratefully acknowledged: Boban Arsenijević, Barbara Bächli, Silvio Bär, Janneke ter Beek, Hans den Besten, Anne Breitbarth, Hans Broekhuis, Kathrin Büchler, Petrea Bürgin, Martin Businger, Liesbeth De Clerk, Jeroen van Craenen- broeck, Peter Gallmann, Berit Gehrke, Martin Graf, Beatrice Hartmann, Jutta Hartmann, Andreas Henrici, Maja Hermann, Holger Hopp, Riny Huybregts, Irene Jacobi, Katarina Klein, Alies MacLean, Marjo van Koppen, Joost Kremers, Roland Litscher, Michael Mente, Nataša Milićević, Heinz Moser, Marlys Moser, Franziska Näf-Vosnjak, Roland Pfau, Mika Poss, Christian Rapold, Hilke Reckmann, Mir- jam Rigterink, Didier Ruedin, Etienne Ruedin, Marianne Ruedin, Michel Ruedin, Claudia Schmellentin, Manuela Schönenberger, Eric Schoorlemmer, Charlotte Schweri, Guido Seiler, Roman Sigg, Benjamin Stückelberger, Rafael Suter, Mark de Vries, Ton van der Wouden, Kathrin Würth, Martina Würth, Lukas Zaugg, Silvia Zaugg-Coretti, Hedde Zeijlstra, Tobias Zimmermann, Regula Zimmermann-Etter, Hans-Jürg Zollinger, Serena Zweimüller. Dierent versions of parts of this work were presented at the following oc- casions: At the GGS in Mannheim (2004), at the TABU-dag in Groningen (2004), Preface Ë IX at the Bilbao-Deusto Conference in Linguistics in Bilbao (2004), at the Tage der Schweizer Linguistik in Bern (2004), at the first Syntax Aio Meeting in Leiden (2004), at CONSOLE 13 in Tromsø (2004), at the TIN-dag in Utrecht (2005), at GLOW 28 in Geneva (2005), at the GGS in Tübingen (2005), at CGSW 20 in Tilburg (2005), at the second Syntax Aio Meeting in Utrecht (2005), at the TIN-dag in Utrecht (2006), at the Workshop on Formal Approaches to Variation in Syntax in York (2007), at the GGS in Constance (2007), at the Workshop on Short Wh- Words in Constance (2007), at the University of Geneva (2007), at the Workshop on Descriptive and Explanatory Adequacy in Leiden (2008), at the University of Leipzig (2008), at the TIN-dag in Utrecht (2009), at the University of Göttingen (2010), at the Resumptive Pronoun Workshop in Jerusalem (2012), at the Univer- sity of Leipzig (2013 and 2014), at the EGG Summer School in Debrecen (2014), at CGSW 29 in York (2014), at the University College London (2015), at the Workshop on Obligatoriness at TbiLLC in Tbilisi (2015), at the Syntax and Semantics Collo- quium in Paris (2015), at the Séminaire LaGraM at Paris 8 (2016), and at GLOW 39 in Göttingen (2016). I thank the audiences at these occasions, in particular: Klaus Abels, David Adger, Elena Anagnostopoulou, Sjef Barbiers, Rajesh Bhatt, Ellen Brandner, Joan Bresnan, Hans Broekhuis, Jeroen van Craenenbroeck, Berthold Crysmann, Mar- cel den Dikken, Jürg Fleischer, Hans-Martin Gärtner, Erich Groat, Eric Haeberli, Fabian Heck, Anke Himmelreich, Daniel Hole, Riny Huybregts, Ray Jackendo, Idan Landau, Winnie Lechner, Marika Lekakou, Lanko Marušič, Tom McFadden, Gereon Müller, Andrew Murphy, Ad Neeleman, Andrew Nevins, Genoveva Puskas, Henk van Riemsdijk, Guido Seiler, Ivy Sichel, Ur Shlonsky, Wolfgang Sternefeld, Ralf Vogel, Mark de Vries, Philipp Weisser, and Jan-Wouter Zwart. I also thank the anonymous reviewer for his insightful comments on the first version of this book. For help with Swiss German data, I am particularly grateful toMartinGrafand Christoph Landolt from the Idiotikon, who answered all my questions with great patience and in remarkable detail. I am further indebted to the De Gruyter team: to Lara Wysong and Emily Farrell for their support and for not giving up on me and, once the book finally material- ized, to Antje-Kristin Mayr for her patient help in the publication process. Since this work was supported by generous grants from the Swiss National Science Foundation (grant no. PA00P1_136379/1) and the German Research Foun- dation (SA 2646/1-1), I would
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Parameters and Micro-Parameters in Arabic Sentence Structure
    PARAMETERS AND MICRO-PARAMETERS IN ARABIC SENTENCE STRUCTURE By Kemel Jouini A thesis submitted to the Victoria University of Wellington in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Linguistics Victoria University of Wellington 2014 ACKNOWLEGDMENTS I would like to thank Professor Elabbas Benmamoun, in particular, for accepting to be my adviser for the nine-month period I spent at the Department of Linguistics at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in the academic year 2004-2005 as a non- degree Fulbright grantee. During my stay at UIUC, Elabbas’s lectures convinced me of the view that a proper understanding of the feature structure of functional categories could enlighten linguistic theory on how the structure of sentences could vary cross-linguistically. Special thanks go to Dr. Elizabeth Pearce for willing to be my supervisor, for her patience to read through the so many drafts of chapters I was sending her, and for her advice on the numerous revisions I thereby had to make. I also thank Professor Richard S. Kayne for the invaluable opportunity he offered me during his visit at VUW to discuss with him some aspects of micro- parametric syntax relevant to my analysis of verbal inflection. Last, but not least, I thank my secondary supervisor Dr. Sasha Calhoun for her willingness to share ideas and offer suggestions, as well as Professor Laurie Bauer for his helpful comments on part of my thesis. I also want to thank Professor Tim Stowell, Professor Halldór Sigurðsson, Professor Henry Davis, Professor Jan Koster and Dr. Fred Hoyt for sending me documents I could not find elsewhere.
    [Show full text]
  • RELATIONAL NOUNS, PRONOUNS, and Resumptionw Relational Nouns, Such As Neighbour, Mother, and Rumour, Present a Challenge to Synt
    Linguistics and Philosophy (2005) 28:375–446 Ó Springer 2005 DOI 10.1007/s10988-005-2656-7 ASH ASUDEH RELATIONAL NOUNS, PRONOUNS, AND RESUMPTIONw ABSTRACT. This paper presents a variable-free analysis of relational nouns in Glue Semantics, within a Lexical Functional Grammar (LFG) architecture. Rela- tional nouns and resumptive pronouns are bound using the usual binding mecha- nisms of LFG. Special attention is paid to the bound readings of relational nouns, how these interact with genitives and obliques, and their behaviour with respect to scope, crossover and reconstruction. I consider a puzzle that arises regarding rela- tional nouns and resumptive pronouns, given that relational nouns can have bound readings and resumptive pronouns are just a specific instance of bound pronouns. The puzzle is: why is it impossible for bound implicit arguments of relational nouns to be resumptive? The puzzle is highlighted by a well-known variety of variable-free semantics, where pronouns and relational noun phrases are identical both in category and (base) type. I show that the puzzle also arises for an established variable-based theory. I present an analysis of resumptive pronouns that crucially treats resumptives in terms of the resource logic linear logic that underlies Glue Semantics: a resumptive pronoun is a perfectly ordinary pronoun that constitutes a surplus resource; this surplus resource requires the presence of a resumptive-licensing resource consumer, a manager resource. Manager resources properly distinguish between resumptive pronouns and bound relational nouns based on differences between them at the level of semantic structure. The resumptive puzzle is thus solved. The paper closes by considering the solution in light of the hypothesis of direct compositionality.
    [Show full text]
  • The University of Hull Mutation and the Syntactic Structure Of
    THE UNIVERSITY OF HULL MUTATION AND THE SYNTACTIC STRUCTURE OF i MODERN COLLOQUIAL WELSH being a Thesis submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the University of Hull by MARGARET OLWEN TALLERMAN B.A. (HONS.) June 1987 -b bLf3 1987 SUMMAR/ Summary of Thesis submitted for PhD degree by Margaret Olwen Tallerman on Mutation and the Syntactic Structure of Modern Colloquial Welsh In this dissertation I discuss the phenomenon of initial consonantal mutation in modern Welsh, and explore the syntactic structure of this language: I will concentrate on the syntax of Colloquial rather than Literary Welsh. It transpires that mutation phenomena can frequently be cited as evidence for or against certain syntactic analyses. In chapter 1 I present a critical survey of previous treatments of mutation, and show that mutation in Welsh conforms to a modified version of the Trigger Constraint proposed by Lieber and by Zwicky. It is argued that adjacency of the mutation trigger is the criterial property in Welsh. Chapter 2 presents a comprehensive description of the productive environments for mutation in modern Welsh. In chapter 3 I give a snort account of Government and Binding theory, the framework used for several recent analyses of Celtic languages. I also discuss proposals that have been made concerning the underlying word order of Welsh, a surface VSO language. Although I reject SVO underlying order, I conclude that there is nonetheless a VP constituent in Welsh. Chapters 4 and 5 concern the role of NPs as triggers for Soft Mutation: both overt and 1 empty category NPs are considered.
    [Show full text]
  • Contracted Preposition-Determiner Forms in German: Semantics And
    Contracted Preposition-Determiner Forms in German: Semantics and Pragmatics A Thesis Presented to the Departament de Traducci´oi Filologia, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy by Estela Sophie Puig Waldm¨uller Advisor: Dr. Louise McNally Seifert March, 2008 Table of Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 Contexts where NCFs are used or preferred 4 2.1 Introduction . 5 2.2 Basic assumptions on the use of definite NPs in German . 5 2.2.1 Anaphoric use . 9 2.2.2 Endophoric use . 10 2.2.3 Generic use . 11 2.2.4 Use with inferable referents . 12 2.2.5 Use with “inherently” unique expressions . 14 2.3 NCFs as anaphoric definites . 15 2.4 NCFs as endophoric definites . 20 2.4.1 Restrictive relative clauses . 20 2.4.2 Restrictive modifiers . 22 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS iii 2.5 NCFs with inferable referents (“Bridging”) . 23 2.6 Summary . 25 3 Contexts where CFs are used or preferred 26 3.1 Introduction . 27 3.2 Overview . 27 3.3 CFs with semantically unique expressions . 31 3.3.1 “Head-Noun-Driven” uniqueness . 31 3.3.1.1 Proper nouns . 31 3.3.1.2 Time and Date expressions . 34 3.3.1.3 Abstract expressions . 35 3.3.1.4 Situationally unique individuals . 37 3.3.2 “Modifier-Driven” uniqueness: Superlatives and or- dinals . 41 3.4 CFs with non-specific readings . 42 3.4.1 Relational use . 43 3.4.2 Situational use (“Configurational use”) . 44 3.4.3 Idiomatic use .
    [Show full text]
  • לפני; של; תוך; בלעדי; אל :Confusables • • Less Commonly Used Prepositions (Appendix)
    8. PREPOSITIONS מילות יחס This chapter discusses: • The formal characteristics of the prepositions (section 1) • The meanings of the prepositions (section 2) • The use of prepositions within the sentence (section 3) ליד; לפי; לפני; של; תוך; בלעדי; אל :Confusables • • Less commonly used prepositions (Appendix) This chapter will help the reader to: • Distinguish between translatable and non-translatable prepositions • Choose the correct translation for prepositions with multiple meanings are definite or indefinite ב,כ,ל Determine whether nouns preceded by the prepositions • • Identify the reference of inflected prepositions in relative clauses • Use prepositions as an aid in reading comprehension 298 . prepositions Prepositions: an overview Prepositions link verbs, nouns and adjectives to nouns. Unlike Hebrew nouns, verbs and adjec- tives, prepositions have no number or gender markings. The preposition may be attached to merge ל- and כ- ,ב -the noun or stand on its own as an independent word. The prepositions .ה -with the definite article In Hebrew, a preposition cannot be followed by a pronoun – instead, it is inflected with the appropriate pronoun suffix. Some prepositions have a fixed meaning and are, therefore, translatable into English. Others – usually those that are required by the verb and as such are considered part of it (in fact, the preposition may change the meaning of the verb) – may be ignored in translation, or may have different translation options in different linguistic environments. 1. The forms of the prepositions The
    [Show full text]
  • The Acquisition of English and Arabic Existential Constructions by Emad
    The Acquisition of English and Arabic Existential Constructions By Emad Mohammed Al-Kulaib Submitted to the Department of Linguistics and the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Kansas in Partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy. ___________________ (Chair) ______________________ ______________________ ______________________ ______________________ (Committee Members) Date Defended: 4/30/2010 The Dissertation Committee for Emad Mohammed Al-Kulaib certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: The Acquisition of English and Arabic Existential Constructions Committee: ___________________ (Chair) ______________________ ______________________ ______________________ ______________________ Date Approved: 06 / 23 / 2010 II Abstract This study is an investigation of the acquisition of existential constructions (ECs) in English and in Spoken Arabic. It is the first of its kind in that it examines the acquisition of the pieces and the features that form ECs; namely, existential there , the copula, definiteness, and agreement for English and existential fii , definiteness, word order, and negation for Spoken Arabic. The children learning English and Arabic had difficulties producing adult-like ECs. However, the difficulties that the children learning Arabic had with ECs are different from the difficulties that the children learning English had with English ECs. An analysis the files of Eve (Brown, 1973), Nina (Suppes, 1973) and Peter (Bloom 1970), taken from the CHILDES database (MacWhinney & Snow, 1985) showed that English existentials are not acquired at the same time as deictic constructions (DCs); existential contexts appear later than deictic ones and are much less productive. The children had difficulties acquiring be in both constructions. The data shows that acquisition of be in existential constructions follows a different pattern of development than deictic be and auxiliary–be.
    [Show full text]
  • Prepositional Nominals in Manx Gaelic
    Prepositional nominals in Manx Gaelic Max W. Wheeler October 2016 Alongside true prepositions, such as fo ‘under’, lesh ‘with’, that are inflected with suffixes expressing personal pronoun objects (foym ‘under me’, lhiam ‘with me’, etc.), Manx has a number of expressions with broadly prepositional meaning that behave grammatically in some respects like nouns, and for the most part are derived from nouns. The personal pronoun objects of these prepositional nominals1 are expressed by means of possessive (genitive) constructions, as in my chooyl ‘behind me’, nyn drooid or ny hrooid oc ‘through them’. In this paper I describe the usage of twenty such items in Classical Manx (c. 1700-1850). A characteristic of the construction of most of these items is that the 3rd singular possessive pronoun takes the form ny, as in ny enish ‘in his presence’, ‘before him’, ny jeï ‘after her’. Here the n- is the last vestige of a preposition meaning ‘in’ (cf. Irish i, Scottish Gaelic an). Thus cooyl ‘behind’ was originally ‘(in) back (of)’, and noï ‘against’ was originally ‘in face (of)’. Five of the twenty items here have a slightly different construction, in that the 3rd singular possessive pronoun is the regular e ‘his/her/its’; these are beeal, kione (mychione), skyn (erskyn), son and toshiaght. Beeal, skyn, son and toshiaght are themselves constructed as objects of the preposition er ‘on’, but, as set out below, each of them deviates to some degree from the regular pattern of Preposition + Noun + possessive complement that we see, for example in er graih yn tushtal ‘for the Gospel’s sake’, er my ghraih hene ‘for my own sake’, or ayns ynnyd Yee ‘instead of God’, ayns my ynnyd ‘in my stead’, ’syn ynnyd oc ‘in their stead’.
    [Show full text]
  • The Problem of Translating the Prepositions At, in and on Into Arabic: an Applied Linguistic Approach
    Journal for the Study of English Linguistics ISSN 2329-7034 2013, Vol. 1, No. 2 The Problem of Translating the Prepositions at, in and on into Arabic: An Applied Linguistic Approach Sadeq Ali Saad Al Yaari Corresponding author) Independent Researcher, Dept. of English, College of Arts, King Saud University (KSU) Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia E-mail: [email protected] Nassr Almaflehi Professor of statistics Received: October 28, 2013 Accepted: November 10, 2013 Published: December 12, 2013 doi:10.5296/jsel.v1i2.4744 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5296/jsel.v1i2.4744 Abstract Background: Prepositions pose major problems when translated from English into Arabic. The accurate mappings between English-Arabic prepositions are sometimes very difficult to determine by Arab learners. Aims: This study is designed to identify the difficulties of translating the English prepositions at, in and on, which Saudi EFL students may face when translating them into Arabic. The purpose was to determine which type of the two sexes (males or females) can translate these three prepositions better. Methods: Fifty (50) Saudi EFL students (25 males, 25 females) were asked to translate twenty (20) sentences and phrases on English prepositions at, in, and on into Arabic. Conclusions: Findings revealed that Saudi EFL students face problems related to use and usage when transferring simple prepositions from English into Arabic. Significant differences related to the performances of both males and females where females scored higher marks than those scored by the males. These findings suggest that acquired skills and abilities involved in translation appear to be more strongly activated in the English-Arabic tasks in women as compared to men.
    [Show full text]
  • Irish Prepositions: Agreement and Impoverishment
    Irish Prepositions: Agreement and Impoverishment Jonathan Brennan New York University 1. Introduction This paper discusses an instance of apparent morphological blocking in Modern Irish. Traditionally, blocking has been invoked to explain grammaticality patterns such as that in (1). (1) a. * more smart b. smarter According to one view, (1a) and (1b) are two potentially grammatical outputs produced by the linguistic system. The two forms compete for expression and the single form smarter is preferred over the two-word form more smart (e.g. Andrews, 1990; Bresnan, 2001b); I will call this the “Global Economy” view. The ungrammaticality of (1a) is, in this view, a direct consequence of the fact that (1b) is available. Another view holds that blocking effects emerge from the obligatory application of local morphological rules; competition takes place only at individual nodes during vocabulary insertion (VI) (e.g. Embick and Marantz, to appear). According to the latter view, there is, in fact, no direct competition between (1a) and (1b). Rather, the latter is generated by the linguistic system while the former is not; (1a) would be ungrammatical regardless of the status of (1b). I will call this the “Local Application” view. Modern Irish shows a complementary distribution between the availability of pronouns and the appearance of inflectional morphology expressing person, number, and gender on verbs and prepositions (McCloskey and Hale, 1984, henceforth: MH). While this distribution has been fruitfully studied in the verbal domain (MH; Doron, 1988; Guilfoyle, 1990; Andrews, 1990; Legate, 1999), the present paper examines those aspects of inflection unique to prepositions. Interestingly, prepositions show that the spell-out of inflection is also conditioned by the presence of an overt lexical argument.
    [Show full text]
  • Aspects of Verbal Noun Constructions in Medieval Irish and Welsh
    Aspects of Verbal Noun C onstructions in Medieval Irish and Welsh Aspects of VerbalWith RNounefere nConstructionsce to Similar in Medieval ConIrishstruc tandions Welshin Basque With Reference to Similar Constructions in Basque Patricia Ronan Patricia Ronan PhD Dissertation National University of Ireland, Maynooth Supervisor: Prof. K. R. McCone August 2006 2 Abstract This study provides a survey of the constructions of verbal nouns with prep- ositions that are used in a significant way, such as creating syntactic and semantic contexts not found with ordinary nouns. Particular emphasis is placed on constructions serving to denote tense, mood and aspect. Also some syntactic contexts involving verbal nouns as objects are examined. This ma- terial has been collected primarily from Old and Middle Irish texts, but some reference is made to Modern Irish where this seems helpful in order to illus- trate developments. The observations made are compared to findings on the use of verbal nouns in a closely related language, Middle Welsh, and an unrelated, non-Indo-European language, Basque. The discussion of the Me- dieval Irish material is followed by the evaluation of an illustrative corpus of Middle Welsh data and available descriptions of Welsh verbal nouns. Paral- lel constructions in these Insular Celtic languages are then brought together in order to assess which prepositional verbal noun constructions might have been a feature of Insular Celtic. Data from Basque is compared to the find- ings for Insular Celtic. The results seek to identify the language specific features of Old Irish verbal nouns and a common core of verbal noun usage in Insular Celtic as opposed to other usages adopted by a non-Indo-European sample language.
    [Show full text]
  • PREPOSITIONS in STRAITS SALISH and the NOUN/VERB OUESTION* Eloise Jelinek University of Arizona D. Introduction. in This Paper I
    159 160 PREPOSITIONS IN STRAITS SALISH AND THE NOUN/VERB OUESTION* America, and constitute a class of referring expressions. Propositional and Relative clauses may be designated nominalized clauses. Eloise Jelinek University of Arizona The generalization that emerges from the study of Salish is that while the contrast between main and nominalized clause types may be a language D. Introduction. In this paper I would like to call attention to a universal, Salish provides evidence that the contrast between "zero-level" particular aspect of the grammar of Straits Salish that has received nouns and verbs at the lexical level may be subject to parametric comparatively little systematic attention to date: prepositional phrases. variation. The claim is not simply that in Straits Salish, nouns may be I will argue that the syntax of prepositional phrases provides important derived from verbs, as is not uncommonly seen across languages; the claim data bearing on the important question of whether or not these languages is that there are no lexical items that on syntactic grounds are show a distinction between noun and verb at the level of lexical categories exclusively either noun or verb. There is no subclass of predicate that -- a much-disputed question of considerable interest for the study of alone is associated with the maximal projections NP and VP. Nominalized language universals. Although passing mention of the noun/verb problem was clauses are derived from finite main clauses. made early on by those working on the languages of the Northwest, including Boas, the problem was first addressed in depth by Kuipers (1968).
    [Show full text]
  • THE DEVELOPMENT of the UNIVERSAL PERFECT in ARABIC Maris Camilleri
    THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE UNIVERSAL PERFECT IN ARABIC Maris Camilleri University of Essex Arabic has a construction that expresses a universal perfect interpretation. It is here argued that this construction, which is widespread across the different vernaculars, can be analyzed as a possessive perfect construction, a structure thought to be rather rare beyond Indo-European lan - guages spoken in Europe. I further argue that the grammaticalization path differs from that of well-known possessive perfect structures across European languages. I hypothesize that the struc - ture which paved the way for the grammaticalization of a universal perfect construction across Arabic was a possessive structure, originally headed by a preposition, which eventually developed into a transitive verbal predicate taking an interval-denoting object as its possessum, and which subsequently grammaticalized into a construction expressing the universal perfect. * Keywords : universal perfect, Arabic, possessive perfect, grammaticalization 1. Introduction . This article provides a cross-dialectal syntactic and diachronic characterization of a construction expressing a universal perfect in Arabic, de - scribed as such by Holes (1984:108), Watson (1993:80), Ingham (1994), and Hallman (2016) for Gulf, Ṣanʕāni, Najdi, and Syrian Arabic, respectively. The construction in - volves what at first approximation seems to be the prepositional predicate il or la ‘to’. The contrast between these two forms is subject to cross-dialectal variation, and both forms are sometimes encliticized to a host as l. This study considers data from (Tetou - ani) Moroccan, Algerian, (Tunis and Sfaxi) Tunisian, (Tripoli and Benghazi) Libyan, Maltese, (Khartoum) Sudanese, Egyptian, Negev Arabic, (rural) Palestinian, (Dama - scene and Aleppan) Syrian, (Baghdad and southern) Iraqi, Kuwaiti, Omani, and (Tabuk, Najdi, and Abha) Saudi varieties of Arabic.
    [Show full text]