DOCSLIB.ORG

Ramesses III's Wars and Triumphs at Medinet Habu

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ramesses III's Wars and Triumphs at Medinet Habu RAMESSES III’s WARS AND TRIUMPHS AT MEDINET HABU: BETWEEN NARRATION, HISTORY AND IDENTITY Giacomo Cavillier Historical Background 1 The ‘war and triumph’ theme during the Ramesside Age finds its ideal starting point in the fifth year of Ramesses II’s reign, when the Egyptians fought against the Hittites at Kadesh on the Orontes. This battle was described in many religious monuments as a central event in the pharaoh’s reign. Other events like the campaigns in Syria, Canaan, and Nubia, apart from their military significance, also contributed to the royal propaganda. In these cases, the triumph constituted not only a part of the war’s events, but it was the essential political and religious ‘justification’ of the situa- tion ante eventum and the consequential gift to the gods post eventum. The complexity of this phase can be attributed to the different cultural 1 Abbreviations: KRI = Kenneth A. Kitchen, Ramesside Inscriptions: Historical and Biographical (Oxford: Blackwell, 1968–99); RITA = K. A. Kitchen, Ramesside Inscriptions: Translated and Annotated: Translations V (Malden, Mass.: Blackwell, 2008) and RITANC = Kenneth A. Kitchen, Ramessides Inscriptions: Translated and Annotated: Notes and Com- ments II (Oxford: Blackwell, 1999). Selected bibliography: Giacomo Cavillier, Il Faraone Guerriero: i sovrani del Nuovo Regno alla conquista dell’Asia, tra mito: strategia bellica e realtà archeologica (Turin: Tirrenia stampatori, 2001); Cavillier “Il bollettino di guerra nella prassi narrativa ramesside,” Stu- dia Asiana 3 (2002): 83–98; Cavillier, Tuthmosi III: Immagine e strategia di un condottiero (Turin: Tirrenia stampatori, 2003); Cavillier, Gli Shardana nell’Egitto Ramesside (Oxford: Archaeopress, 2005); Cavillier, La Battaglia di Qadesh: Ramesse II alla conquista dell’Asia (Turin: Tirrenia stampatori, 2006); Cavillier, Migdol: Richerche su modelli di architettura militare di età ramesside: Medinet Habu (Oxford: Archaeopress, 2008); Mario Liverani, Antico Oriente: storia, società, economia (Rome: Laterza, 1991); Liverani, Guerra e diplo- mazia nell’Antico Oriente (Rome: Laterza, 1994); Liverani, “Ramesside Egypt in a Chang- ing World: An Institutional Approach,” in L’Impero Ramesside: convegno internazionale in onore di Sergio Donadoni (Rome: Università degli studi di Roma “La Sapienza,” 1997), 101–16; Liverani, Oltre la Bibbia: Storia del popolo di Israele (Bari: Laterza, 2004); Daniel Kahn, “Who is Meddling in Egypt’s Affairs? The Identity of the Asiatics in the Elephantine Stele of Sethnakhte and the Historicity of the Medinet Habu Asiatic War Reliefs,” Journal of Ancient Egyptian Interconnections 2 (2010): 14–23; Ellen F. Morris, The Architecture of Imperialism: Military Bases and the Evolution of Foreign Policy in Egypt’s New Kingdom (Leiden: Brill, 2005); Alexander J. Peden, Egyptian Historical Inscriptions of the Twentieth Dynasty (Jonsered, Sweden: Åströms, 1994); and Anthony J. Spalinger, War In Ancient Egypt: The New Kingdom (Malden, Mass.: Blackwell, 2005). 24 giacomo cavillier JUSTIFICATION WAR EVENTS Campaigns, battles, sieges TRIUMPH Post war events Diplomacy, Commerce, Alliances Fig. 1. Ramesses II’s narration scheme. aspects of the Egyptian ideology of war as diplomacy, cult, strategy, and politics, where the triumph acts as a link to all micro and macro events that together compose the entire historical situation (fig. 1).2 However, this modus operandi was adopted only in part by Ramesses II’s successor Merneptah, and it terminated under the political instability during the reigns of Amenmesse, Seti II, Siptah, and Tauseret. The partial change in the propaganda ‘scheme’ during Merneptah’s reign is due to the deep changes in the Ancient Near Eastern political mosaic after the peace treaty between Egypt and the Hittite Empire, com- bined with the crisis at the end of the Late Bronze Age (including the city-state kinglets in Syria-Palestine), and the increase of the power of nomadic-tribal cultures in desert regions.3 Merneptah’s enemies were Libyans, Sea Peoples, and Canaanites, all comprising tribes, peoples, and cultures. They had rituals and concepts that differed from the ‘traditional’ great empires, such as in the diplo- macy (contacts by correspondence with tribute and gifts), and control of territory. For these ‘opponents’ the schemata available from writ- ten Egyptian texts suggests an attenuation of the link from justification and triumph. If the former assumed the characteristics of the typical Königsnovelle with no political and diplomatic implications ante eventum 2 Cavillier, “Il bollettino di guerra nella prassi narrativa ramesside”; Cavillier, Gli Shar- dana nell’Egitto Ramesside; and Cavillier, La Battaglia di Qadesh: Ramesse II alla conquista dell’Asia, 68–75. 3 Cavillier, Il Faraone Guerriero, 171–183; and Liverani, Oltre la Bibbia, 38–81..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Canaan Or Gaza?
    Journal of Ancient Egyptian Interconnections Pa-Canaan in the Egyptian New Kingdom: Canaan or Gaza? Michael G. Hasel Institute of Archaeology, Southern Adventist University A&564%'6 e identification of the geographical name “Canaan” continues to be widely debated in the scholarly literature. Cuneiform sources om Mari, Amarna, Ugarit, Aššur, and Hattusha have been discussed, as have Egyptian sources. Renewed excavations in North Sinai along the “Ways of Horus” have, along with recent scholarly reconstructions, refocused attention on the toponyms leading toward and culminating in the arrival to Canaan. is has led to two interpretations of the Egyptian name Pa-Canaan: it is either identified as the territory of Canaan or the city of Gaza. is article offers a renewed analysis of the terms Canaan, Pa-Canaan, and Canaanite in key documents of the New Kingdom, with limited attention to parallels of other geographical names, including Kharu, Retenu, and Djahy. It is suggested that the name Pa-Canaan in Egyptian New Kingdom sources consistently refers to the larger geographical territory occupied by the Egyptians in Asia. y the 1960s, a general consensus had emerged regarding of Canaan varied: that it was a territory in Asia, that its bound - the extent of the land of Canaan, its boundaries and aries were fluid, and that it also referred to Gaza itself. 11 He Bgeographical area. 1 The primary sources for the recon - concludes, “No wonder that Lemche’s review of the evidence struction of this area include: (1) the Mari letters, (2) the uncovered so many difficulties and finally led him to conclude Amarna letters, (3) Ugaritic texts, (4) texts from Aššur and that Canaan was a vague term.” 12 Hattusha, and (5) Egyptian texts and reliefs.
    [Show full text]
  • The Karnak Hypostyle Hall Project Field Report 2004-2005 by Peter J
    The Karnak Hypostyle Hall Project Field Report 2004-2005 By Peter J. Brand Introduction Collation of Facsimile Drawings of the Battle Reliefs of Ramesses II on the South Wall with Our field work was authorized by Egypt’s Su- Palimpsest of the Battle of Kadesh. preme Council of Antiquities and functioned with the cooperation of the Centre Franco-égyptien pour l’étude The main objective of the season was to com- des Temples de Karnak. We extend our thanks to our plete collation of war scenes on the south exterior wall other Egyptian and French colleagues: Dr. Zahi Hawas, of the Hypostyle Hall in order to produce facsimile President of the SCA, along with the entire Perma- drawings of these reliefs. Initial drawings of these war nent Committee which authorized our work. In Luxor, scenes were first made in 1995. We began collation of we are grateful to Mr. Ibrahim Sulliman, the Director the drawings in 1999 under the Project’s late director, of Karnak and Mr. Fawzy (our inspector); along with professor William J. Murnane. Our collation of the in- Nicolas Grimal and Emanuelle Laroche (scientific and scriptions on this wall was made more difficult by their field directors of the Centre). The expedition staff for poor state of preservation and the fact that part of the this season’s work included two epigraphists: the field wall is a palimpsest in stone with two sets of hieroglyph- director, Dr. Peter Brand of the University of Memphis, ic texts superimposed one atop the other. Tennessee and Dr. Suzanne Onstine from the Univer- sity of Arizona.
    [Show full text]
  • Patterns of Evidence: Exodus Lesson 1 – Timeline Watch First 20 Minutes
    Patterns of Evidence: Exodus Lesson 1 – Timeline Watch first 20 minutes on Right Now media Exodus Story – Biblical Summary ◦ Joseph moved his family to Egypt during the 7-year famine ◦ Israelites lived in the land of Goshen ◦ Years after Joseph died, a new pharaoh became fearful of the large numbers of Israelites. ◦ Israelites became slaves ◦ Moses was 80 when God sent him to Egypt to free the Israelites ◦ After Passover, the Israelites wandered in the desert for 40 years ◦ Israelites conquered the Promised Land An Overview of Egyptian History Problems with Egyptian History ◦ Historians began with multiple lists of Pharaoh’s names carved on temple walls ◦ These lists are incomplete, sometimes skipping Pharaohs ◦ Once a “standard” list had been made, then they looked at other known histories and inserted the list ◦ These dates then became the accepted timeline Evidence for the Late Date – 1250 BC • Genesis 47:11-12 • Exodus 18-14 • Earliest archaeological recording of the Israelites dates to 1210 BC on the Merneptah Stele o Must be before that time o Merneptah was the son of Ramses II • Ten Commandments and Prince of Egypt Movies take the Late Date with Ramses II Evidence for the Early Date – 1440 BC • “From Abraham to Paul: A Biblical Chronology” by Andrew Steinmann • 1 Kings 6:1 – Solomon began building temple 480 years after the Exodus o Solomon’s reign began 971 BC and began building temple in 967 BC o Puts Exodus date at 1447 BC • 1 Chronicles 6 lists 19 generations from Exodus to Solomon o Assume 25 years per generation – Exodus occurred
    [Show full text]
  • ROYAL STATUES Including Sphinxes
    ROYAL STATUES Including sphinxes EARLY DYNASTIC PERIOD Dynasties I-II Including later commemorative statues Ninutjer 800-150-900 Statuette of Ninuter seated wearing heb-sed cloak, calcite(?), formerly in G. Michaelidis colln., then in J. L. Boele van Hensbroek colln. in 1962. Simpson, W. K. in JEA 42 (1956), 45-9 figs. 1, 2 pl. iv. Send 800-160-900 Statuette of Send kneeling with vases, bronze, probably made during Dyn. XXVI, formerly in G. Posno colln. and in Paris, Hôtel Drouot, in 1883, now in Berlin, Ägyptisches Museum, 8433. Abubakr, Abd el Monem J. Untersuchungen über die ägyptischen Kronen (1937), 27 Taf. 7; Roeder, Äg. Bronzefiguren 292 [355, e] Abb. 373 Taf. 44 [f]; Wildung, Die Rolle ägyptischer Könige im Bewußtsein ihrer Nachwelt i, 51 [Dok. xiii. 60] Abb. iv [1]. Name, Gauthier, Livre des Rois i, 22 [vi]. See Antiquités égyptiennes ... Collection de M. Gustave Posno (1874), No. 53; Hôtel Drouot Sale Cat. May 22-6, 1883, No. 53; Stern in Zeitschrift für die gebildete Welt 3 (1883), 287; Ausf. Verz. 303; von Bissing in 2 Mitteilungen des Kaiserlich Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts, Athenische Abteilung xxxviii (1913), 259 n. 2 (suggests from Memphis). Not identified by texts 800-195-000 Head of royal statue, perhaps early Dyn. I, in London, Petrie Museum, 15989. Petrie in Journal of the Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland xxxvi (1906), 200 pl. xix; id. Arts and Crafts 31 figs. 19, 20; id. The Revolutions of Civilisation 15 fig. 7; id. in Anc. Eg. (1915), 168 view 4; id. in Hammerton, J. A.
    [Show full text]
  • The Battle of Kadesh: Identifying New Kingdom Polities, Places, And
    5IF#BUUMFPG,BEFTI*EFOUJGZJOH/FX,JOHEPN 1PMJUJFT 1MBDFT BOE1FPQMFTJOCanaan and Syria1 Michael G. Hasel Institute of Archaeology, Southern Adventist University Abstract ary Record,” “Bulletin,” and “Reliefs” indi- cates that the Egyptians were remarkably In 1950 J.A. Wilson published a footnote consistent in their designation of these for- citing the “notorious carelessness” of Egyp- eign entities. Further suggestions are given tian scribal convention in assigning deter- on establishing the Egyptian perspective of minatives to foreign names in the standard foreign names through textual analysis in reference work Ancient Near Eastern Texts. comparison with archaeological data. This note influenced numerous scholars outside the field of Egyptology without Introduction any careful study of the evidence. This brief study readdresses the issue of scribal con- Ever since the first documenta- vention in writing foreign names from the perspective of the most widely published tion of Egyptian monuments by event during the Egyptian New Kingdom: Napoleon’s Commission for the the Battle of Kadesh. A statistical analysis of Arts and Sciences, Egypt’s contacts foreign names in the copies of the “Liter- with foreign polities, places, and peoples have captivated Egyptolo- 1 This study was conducted while the gists and historians of the ancient author was a Fulbright Senior Scholar Near East. The military campaigns at the Cyprus Archaeological Research of Egypt against surrounding areas Institute (CAARI), Nicosia, Cyprus (2005). Special thanks are extended to produced vivid depictions of their 2 Thomas Davis, director of CAARI and exploits. Here was a source of staff; Daniel Hadjitoffi, director of the new information that could elu- Cyprus Fulbright Commission and staff; cidate these ancient peoples from the library staff of the Cyprus Department an Egyptian perspective.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ancient Egyptian Books of the Earth Wilbour Studies in Egypt and Ancient Western Asia
    THE ANCIEN THE Collections of scenes and texts designated variously as the “Book of the Earth,” “Creation of the Solar Disc,” and “Book of Aker” were inscribed on the walls of royal sarcophagus chambers throughout Egypt’s Ramesside period (Dynasties 19–20). This material illustrated discrete episodes from the The Ancient Egyptian nocturnal voyage of the sun god, which functioned as a model for the resurrection of the deceased T king. These earliest “Books of the Earth” employed mostly ad hoc arrangements of scenes, united E by shared elements of iconography, an overarching, bipartite symmetry of composition, and their GYP Books of the Earth frequent pairing with representations of the double sky overhead. From the Twenty-First Dynasty and later, selections of programmatic tableaux were adapted for use in private mortuary contexts, T I often in conjunction with innovative or previously unattested annotations. The present study collects A and analyzes all currently known Book of the Earth material, including discussions of iconography, BOOKSN OF by Joshua Aaron Roberson grammar, orthography, and architectural setting. Joshua Aaron Roberson is an Assistant Professor in the Department of History, Camden County College. Blackwood, NJ. He has worked as an epigrapher and sigillographer with the University of Pennsylvania expeditions to Saqqara and Abydos and as a sigillographer for the French-Egyptian expedition to the Opet temple at Karnak. He earned his PhD in Egyptology from the University of Pennsylvania. T HE HE EA R T H Joshua Aaron Aaron Joshua Wilbour Studies R o berson Brown University Wilbour Studies in Egypt and Ancient Western Asia, 1 Department of Egyptology and Ancient Western Asian Studies LOCKWOOD PRESS www.lockwoodpress.com LOCKWOOD PRESS Wilbour_cover_template.indd 1 1/27/12 10:24 AM The Ancient Egyptian Books of the Earth Wilbour Studies in Egypt and Ancient Western Asia Series Editors James P.
    [Show full text]
  • The Inscriptions and Paintings of Egyptian Victories
    International Journal of Academic Multidisciplinary Research (IJAMR) ISSN: 2643-9670 Vol. 3 Issue 6, June – 2019, Pages: 4-18 The Inscriptions and paintings of Egyptian victories (The reign of Ceti I, Merneptah and Ramesses III) Nancy Hossam Mahmoud Researcher in Egyptology Faculty of Arts, Minia University, Egypt [email protected] Abstract: This study deals with the Inscriptions and paintings of Egyptian victories of Ceti 1, Merneptah and Ramses III against the Libyans and the sea peoples, in the light of the historical sequence of their wars. The research is divided into three chapters as follows: The first chapter deals with the wars against the Libyans and the monuments of (Seti I), this campaign was mentioned in the inscriptions of the outer wall of the pillar base of the Amon temple in Karnak in Thebes. These are the largest groups of engravings in Egypt. They occupy the entire outer part of the northern wall of the large columns in Karnak. East to the corner on the eastern façade of the eastern hall, and inscriptions arranged in three rows, one above the other. (Merneptah) defeated the Libyans and the sea peoples in several battles, he Immortalize these victories in the Inscriptions triumphs over the temples of Karnak Temple, Temple of Western 'Amara of King Ramses II, Inscriptions of Column in the rain, the Victory painting of Merneptah, Atrib painting. Ramesses III defeated the Libyans and the sea peoples in several battles, he immortalize his victories in the Inscriptions of victories in the temple of Habu. Keywords: Egyptian victories, Ceti 1, Merneptah, Ramses III, the Libyans, the sea peoples, Amon temple in Karnak, temple of Western 'Amara, Atrib painting, temple of Habu.
    [Show full text]
  • The Stele of Merneptah—Assessment of the Final 'Israel' Strophe and Its
    VIEWPOINT || JOURNAL OF CREATION 27(1) 2013 The Stele of Merneptah—assessment of the final ‘Israel’ strophe and its implications for chronology Patrick Clarke The text of the final poetic strophe of the famous stele of the pharaoh Merneptah (item JE 31408, the Cairo Museum) appears to mention Israel. With few exceptions, the majority of archeologists date this text and Merneptah’s reign to the 1200s bc in the Conventional Egyptian Chronology. This would place both this pharaoh and his stele in the biblical time of the Judges. An analysis of this Egyptian text indicates that Merneptah’s reign should instead be dated to 913–903 bc; a movement of three centuries. Furthermore, the stele offers tantalizing clues to the identity of the biblical Shishak. All this has huge ramifications for biblical chronology, bringing us closer to a satisfying correlation of established secular history with the inerrant biblical timeline. he black granite ‘Victory Stele’ of Merneptah was world-famous 28-line ‘Victory Stele’ discussed here, from Tdiscovered by W.F. Petrie in 1896. This stele (3.18 m his mortuary temple on the West Bank at modern Luxor. All high x 1.63 m wide) is the only known Egyptian document refer to military campaigns. generally accepted as mentioning ysry3l—Israel. The text Like his post-Amarna predecessors, Merneptah faced itself is dated by most analysts as c. 1209/1208 BC in the political/military issues in the Egyptian sphere of influence Conventional Egyptian Chronology (CEC). Merneptah’s during his reign. This included crushing a revolt in northern reign itself is assigned to the period 1213–1203 BC, which Reṯenu.1 In his regnal year four, there were problems on would place both this pharaoh and his stele in the biblical Egypt’s western borders which involved the Libyans.2 By time of the Judges.
    [Show full text]
  • Decoding the Medinet Habu Inscriptions: the Ideological Subtext of Ramesses III’S War Accounts
    Peters 1 Decoding the Medinet Habu Inscriptions: The Ideological Subtext of Ramesses III’s War Accounts Abstract: The temple of Medinet Habu in Thebes stands as Ramesses III‘s lasting legacy to Ancient Egyptian history. This monumental structure not only contained luxury goods within, but also a goldmine of information inscribed on its outside walls. Here, Ramesses adorned the temple with stories of military campaigns he led against enemies in the north who hoped to gain control of Egypt. These war accounts have posed a series of problems to modern scholars. Today, the debate still rages over how the inscriptions should be interpreted. This work analyzes Ramesses‘s records through the lens of socioeconomic decline that occurred during his rule in order to demonstrate the role ideology—namely ma‘at—played in his self-representation and his methodology to ensure and legitimize his rule during these precarious times. Scott M. Peters Senior Thesis, Department of History Columbia College, Columbia University April 2011 Advisors: Professor Marc Van De Mieroop and Professor Martha Howell Word Count: 17,070 (with footnotes + bibliography included) Peters 2 Figure 1: Map of Ancient Egypt with key sites. Image reproduced from Marc Van De Mieroop, A History of Ancient Egypt (Malden: Wiley-Blackwell, 2011), 28. Peters 3 Introduction When describing his victory over invading forces in the north of Egypt, Ramesses III, ruler at the time, wrote: …Those who came on land were overthrown and slaughtered…Amon-Re was after them destroying them. Those who entered the river mouths were like birds ensnared in the net…their leaders were carried off and slain.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Tomb of Nefertari: Conservation of the Wall Paintings
    IN THE TOMB OF NEFERTAR1 IN THE TOMB OF NEFERTARI OF CONSERVATION THE WALL PAINTINGS THE J.PAUL GETTY MUSEUM AND THE GETTY CONSERVATION INSTITUTTE 1992 © 1992 The j. Paul Getty Trust Photo Credits: Guillermo Aldana, figs. I, 2, 4, 8-17, 30, 34-36, 38, cover, 401 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 900 endsheets, title page, copyright page, table of contents; Archives of Late Egyp­ Santa Monica, California 90401 -1455 tian Art, Robert S. Bianchi, New York, figs. 18, 20, 22-27, 31-33,37; Cleveland Museum of Art, fig. 29; Image processing by Earthsat, fig. 7; Metropolitan Kurt Hauser, Designer Museum of Art, New York, figs. 6, 19, 28; Museo Egizio, Turin, figs. 5, 21 (Lovera Elizabeth Burke Kahn, Production Coordinator Giacomo, photographer), half-title page. Eileen Delson, Production Artist Beverly Lazor-Bahr, Illustrator Cover: Queen Nefertari. Chamber C, south wall (detail), before treatment was completed. Endsheets: Ceiling pattern, yellow five-pointed stars on dark blue Typography by Wilsted & Taylor, Oakland, California ground. Half-title page: Stereo view of tomb entrance taken by Don Michele Printing by Westland Graphics, Burbank, California Piccio/Francesco Ballerini, circa 1904. Title page: View of Chamber K, looking Library of Congress Catalogmg-in-Publication Data north. Copyright page: Chamber C, south wall, after final treatment-Table of In the tomb of Nefertari : conservation of the wall paintings, Contents page: Chamber C, south wall (detail), after final treatment. Tomb of p. cm. Nefertari, Western Thebes, Egypt. "Published on the occasion of an exhibition at the J. Paul Getty Published on the occasion of an exhibition atthej.
    [Show full text]
  • Pharaoh's Nine Bows, by Dr. Glenn Carnagey
    CTSJ 3:1 (Summer 1997) p. 1 Pharaoh’s Nine Bows — Dr. Glenn Carnagey * Chafer Theological Seminary [*Editor’s note: Dr. Carnagey earned his B.A. at the University of Houston, Th.M. at Dallas Theological Seminary, and Ph.D. at the University of Tulsa. Glenn has done extensive archaeological work in the Near East and editorial work for a major archaeological journal, as well as presenting scholarly papers at meetings of the Evangelical Theological Society. Dr. Carnagey has also pastored churches in Texas, Oklahoma, and Minnesota. He is a member of Chafer Seminary’s National Board of Advisors, is a contributing editor to the CTS Journal, and was instrumental in the formation of CTS.] Introduction In the year 1210 B.C., Merneptah, 13th son of the mighty Pharaoh Ramses II (already an old man), assumed the throne of Egypt. Almost immediately in his third year he had to fight one nation after another along the long borders of Egypt. Breasted describes the menacing armies like this: [W]ith the Libyans on the one hand and the peoples of remoter Asia Minor on the other, they broke in wave on wave upon the borders of the Pharaoh’s empire. Egypt was inevitably thrown on the defensive, her day passed for conquest and aggression, and for six hundred years the empire made no serious effort to extend her borders.1 According to his account of the results of his battles (never totally reliable in Egyptian history) on the Merneptah Stele: “Israel is laid waste, his seed is not.”2 This is indeed a strange comment in such an important document.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Download Tutankhamun: the Last Secret
    TUTANKHAMUN: THE LAST SECRET PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Christian Jacq | 352 pages | 01 Oct 2009 | Simon & Schuster Ltd | 9781847393920 | English | London, United Kingdom Tutankhamun: The Last Secret PDF Book A hunting chariot needed a bespoke crate and a lot of manhandling -- almost enough men for a football team. Reeves thinks that instead of enlarging a small tomb for Tut, builders might have walled off part of a larger tomb for him. Our renewed CT scanning of the mummies also put to rest the notion that the family suffered from some congenital disease, such as Marfan syndrome, that might explain the elongated faces and feminized appearance seen in the art from the Amarna period. Over time, Reeves began noticing details that suggest that parts of the mask may have been repurposed from the burial goods of another ruler. Thanks for telling us about the problem. Smenkhkara, however, is a controversial figure. Published 23 January Ironically, this attempt to erase his memory preserved Tutankhamun for all time. As visitors ascend, they'll get a sweeping history of Ancient Egypt. I understand I can change my preference through my account settings or unsubscribe directly from any marketing communications at any time. Key points: Discovery of Nefertiti's burial chamber would be the most remarkable Egyptian archaeological find this century British Egyptologist proposed in that Nefertiti's final resting place could be behind wall paintings in King Tut's tomb Ground- penetrating radar has found the tomb does not contain any hidden, man-made blocking walls The announcement brings a disappointing end to years of speculation that the tomb of ancient Egypt's young pharaoh king contained passages to a hidden chamber that could be the last resting place of Queen Nefertiti.
    [Show full text]