DOCSLIB.ORG

Ceremonial Execution and Public Rewards: Some Historical Scenes on New Kingdom Private Stelae

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Zurich Open Repository and Archive University of Zurich Main Library Strickhofstrasse 39 CH-8057 Zurich www.zora.uzh.ch Year: 1988 Ceremonial Execution and Public Rewards: Some Historical Scenes on New Kingdom Private Stelae Schulman, Alan R. Abstract: The repertoire of scenes on Egyptian private stelae is relatively limited to scenes of the funerary banquet, of the deceased receiving offerings, or making them. About the reign of Thutmose IVinthe New Kingdom, and lasting through the end of Dynasty 20, scenes which seemingly have nothing to do with these motifs begin to occasionally appear in the stelae repertoire: the king smiting his enemies, receiving a weapon from a god, a god’s barque carried in procession, the deceased being rewarded with gold collars or riding in his chariot, and the like. The present work attempts to discern why such scenes appear on private stelae. After a careful examination of all of the known private monuments of this class which depict who specific motifs, a) the king smiting an enemy and b) the awarding of gold sbiw-collars to the stela’s dedicatee, a total of approximately 35 monuments, the conclusion was reached that such representations are not merely timeless stereotypes but actually represented specific events which took place at specific points in time. Thus the stelae function on two levels simultaneously, a concreteone commemorating the original event, and an abstract one in which the scene illustrated is repeated for eternity. Posted at the Zurich Open Repository and Archive, University of Zurich ZORA URL: https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-149722 Monograph Published Version Originally published at: Schulman, Alan R. (1988). Ceremonial Execution and Public Rewards: Some Historical Scenes on New Kingdom Private Stelae. Freiburg, Switzerland / Göttingen, Germany: Universitätsverlag / Vandenhoeck Ruprecht. SCHULMAN · CEREMONIAL EXECUTION ORBIS BIBLICUS ET ORIENTALIS Published by the Biblical Institute of the U niversity of Fribourg Switzerland the Seminar für Biblische Zeitgeschichte of the University of Münster i.W. Federal Republic of Germany and the Schweizerische Gesellschaft für orientalische Altertumswissenschaft Editor: Othmar Keel Coeditors: Erich Zenger and Albert de Pury The Author: Alan Richard Schulman was born in Brooklyn on 14.1.1930. He was educated at the City College of New York (BA in Classical Languages and Ancient History, 1952), the Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago (MA in Egyptology, 1958), and the University of Pennsylvania (PhD in Egyptology, 1962). He works as an Assistant in the Egyptian Section of the University Museum from 1958-1962; taught Egyptology as a Visiting Associate Professor at both Dropsie U niversity and Tel Aviv University, was an Instructor in History at Columbia University and is currently Professor of Ancient and Military History at Queens College and the Graduate Center of City University of New York. He has participated in excavations in Egypt and Israel, is the author of Military Rank, Title, and Organization in the Egyptian New Kingdom (Berlin: 1964) and has contributed over seventy articles and numerous book reviews to various scholarly periodicals including The Journal ofthe American Research Center in Egypt, The Journal ofthe Society for the Study of Egyptian Antiquities, Toronto, Chronique d'Egypte, Israel Exploration Journal, Tel Aviv, 'Atiqot, Zeitschrift für Ägyptische Sprache und Alter- tumskunde, Bibliotheca Orientalis, The Journal of Near Eastern Studies, The Bulletin of the Egyptological Seminar, Natural History, and Bollettino de/ Centro Camuno di Studi Preistorici. ORBIS BIBLICUS ET ORIENTALIS 75 ALAN R. SCHULMAN CEREMONIAL EXECUTION AND PUBLIC REWARDS Some Historical Scenes on New Kingdom Private Stelae UNIVERSITÄTSVERLAG FREIBURG SCHWEIZ VANDENHOECK & RUPRECHT GÖTTINGEN 1988 CIP-K11rz#tela,efnahme der Deutschen Bibliothek Alan R. Sch11/man: Ceremonial Execution and Public Rewards. Some Historical Scenes on New Kingdom Private Stelae / Alan R. Schulman. - Freiburg, Schweiz: Universitätsverlag; Göttingen: Van­ denhoeck und Ruprecht, 1988. (Orbis biblicus et orientalis; 75) ISBN 3-525-53704-2 (Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht) ISBN 3-7278-0548-X (Univ.-Verl.) NE:GT Publication subsidized by the Swiss Academy of Humanities © 1988 by Universitätsverlag Freiburg Schweiz Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht Göttingen Paulusdruckerei Freiburg Schweiz ISBN 3-7278-0548-X (Universitätsverlag) ISBN 3-525-53704-2 (Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht) Digitalisat erstellt durch Florian Lippke, Departement für Biblische Studien, Universität Freiburg Schweiz to the Memories of Hilda Schulman,1'904-1986 Rudolf Anthes, 1896-1985 Table of Contents Preface ix Abbreviations xi Bibliography xiii Introduction Notas to the Introduction 6 Chapter t: The Pharaoh Slays His Enemies 8 A. Introduction 8 B. The Free-Standing Stelae 10 c.. The Rock-Cut Stelae 31 D. rhe Meaning of the Scene 39 E. The Temporal Parameters 52 F. The Venue and Conclusions 57 Notas to Chapter 1 63 Chapter 2: The Giving of Goldas a Reward 116 A. Introduction 116 B,. The Stelae 119 C. Conclusions 140 Notas to Chapter 2 148 Chapter 3: Afterthoughts 192 Notas to the Afterthoughts 198 Appendix 200 Notas to the Appendix 211 Addenda 220 Figures (Line Drawings) 225 Plates 255 1:1: l?reface My teacher and dear friend, the late Rudolf Anthes, was tond of telling the.toµ.owing story about one of hie colleagues in Berlin. I think it was Spiegelberg. It seemed that whenever a student would come up with a clearly absurd translation of a text, or an ingenious solution to an Egyptological problem, Spiegelberg would look at him squarely in the eye, muse for a moment, and then say: "Yes ••• that i!!, possible •••• With God any­ thing is possible", Even this book, but it would not have poss­ ible without the kindness and helpfulness of a number of friends and colleagues who read the manuscript, discussed its contents with me, provided me with both the photographs and the permissi­ ons to publish them in the plates, collated texts forme when it was necessary and possible, and, in general, endured the barrages of questions with which I assaulted them with the patience of the Saints. Consequently it gives me great satisfaction to acknowl­ edge here their thoughtfulness, kindness, and assistance, though I, of course, am solely responsible for any flaws, faults, or er­ rors which may be present: Richard Fazzini, Jim Romano, and Diane Gutzman of the Department of Egyptian and Classical Art and the Wilbour Library of the Brooklyn Museum, Henry Fischer, Christine Lilyquist, Ann Russman of the Department of Egyptian Art of the Metropolitan Museum of Art, Herman.de Meulenaere and C. de Wit of the Egyptian Department of Mus/es Royaux d'Art et d'Histoire, Brussels, the late Labib Habachi, Klaus Baer, and John A. Larsen of the Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago, Louise Berge and Maebetty Langdon of the Art Institute of Chicago, Suaan . H. Auth of the Newark Museum, Wolfgang Müller and Karl-Heinz Priese of the Aegyptisches Museum Berlin, DDR, Peter and Irmgard X Munro of the Kestner Museum, Hannover, Jaromir ~lek and Helen Murray of the Griffith Institute of the Ashmolean Museum, Oxford, and Geoffrey T. Martin of University College, London. And, fin­ ally to my wife, Dalia and my children, 'Anath and Magen, without whose patience and forbearance this book could never have been written. To all of the above, individually and collectively I tender my sincerest and deepest thanks. Basically I am a historian. My training is essentially Egptological. What I am not is an artist or draftswan. ~e line drawings which illustrate the individual stelae discussed and catalogued in the text are not and do not pretend tobe fac­ similies of the various monuments, but they do show everything of the latter which I could see. In most cases I worked 1rom a combination of studying the original monument, my own photograph of it, and the published photographs of it, but in some cases I had to depend only on the published photograph or line drawing. In such instances, however, this has been noted in the text. In most instances my line drawings show both the scene and the text of the individual stelae, but in a few instances I have shown only the scene. In all cases of the published monuments, the publications in which they appear are easily accessible and are given as fully as possible. In the case of the unpublished docu­ menta I have included a photograph. New ~ork and te1 AviT, 1986 xi Abbreviations ~ J.H. Breasted, Ancient Records of Egypt. ~ ~ Annales du service des antiguites de l'Egypte. Atlas W.Wreszinski, Atlas zur altägyptischen Kulturge­ schichte. Bulletin de l'Institut Franc,ais d'Archeol.ogie Ori­ entale. Cambridge Ancient History. 3rd edition. CdE' Chronigue d'Egypte. CRIPEL Cahier de Recherches de l'Institut de Papyrologie / et d'Egyptologie de Lille. fil1 GötUnger Miszellen. ~ Journal of the American Oriental Society. ~ Journal of the American Research Center in Egypt. m Journal of EgypUan. Archaeology. ~ Jowrnal. of Hear Eastel!'Il Studies. m K.A. Kitchen, Ramesside Inscriptions, Historical and Biographical. C.R. Lepsius, Denkmäler aus Aegypten und Aethiopien. Lexikon der Aegyptologie. Mitteilungen des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts Abteilung Kairo. Mitteilungen des Instituts für Orientforschung. B. Porter, R. Moss, E.W. Birney, and J. Malek, Topo­ graphical Bibliography of Ancient Egyptian Hie:roglJ:'­ phic Texts, Reliefs, and Paintings. H. Ranke, Die ägyptische Personennamen. Proceedings of the Society of Biblical Archaeology. Rec. ~- Recueil de t:ra~aux relatifs a la philologie et a l'archeologie ~gyptiennes et assyriennes. Rev. ~- Revue d'Egyptologie. xii Urk. IV. Urkunden des ägyptischen Altertums, IV 1 Urkunden der 18. Dynastie. VDI Vestnik Drevne Istorii, n,. WBrterbuch der ttgyptischen Sprache. ~ Wiener Zeitschrift fdr die Kunde des Morgenlandes. ~ Ze11&schrift ftir B.gyptische Sprache und Alter~umskunde. xiii Bi bliograph.y Aime'-Giron, N. "Adversaria Semi tica (III)", ~ 40 ( 1941 ) 433- 460, pls. 30-42. Aldred, C. Jewels of the Pharaohs. abridged ed. (New York: 1979).
Recommended publications
  • Canaan Or Gaza?

    Canaan Or Gaza?

    Journal of Ancient Egyptian Interconnections Pa-Canaan in the Egyptian New Kingdom: Canaan or Gaza? Michael G. Hasel Institute of Archaeology, Southern Adventist University A&564%'6 e identification of the geographical name “Canaan” continues to be widely debated in the scholarly literature. Cuneiform sources om Mari, Amarna, Ugarit, Aššur, and Hattusha have been discussed, as have Egyptian sources. Renewed excavations in North Sinai along the “Ways of Horus” have, along with recent scholarly reconstructions, refocused attention on the toponyms leading toward and culminating in the arrival to Canaan. is has led to two interpretations of the Egyptian name Pa-Canaan: it is either identified as the territory of Canaan or the city of Gaza. is article offers a renewed analysis of the terms Canaan, Pa-Canaan, and Canaanite in key documents of the New Kingdom, with limited attention to parallels of other geographical names, including Kharu, Retenu, and Djahy. It is suggested that the name Pa-Canaan in Egyptian New Kingdom sources consistently refers to the larger geographical territory occupied by the Egyptians in Asia. y the 1960s, a general consensus had emerged regarding of Canaan varied: that it was a territory in Asia, that its bound - the extent of the land of Canaan, its boundaries and aries were fluid, and that it also referred to Gaza itself. 11 He Bgeographical area. 1 The primary sources for the recon - concludes, “No wonder that Lemche’s review of the evidence struction of this area include: (1) the Mari letters, (2) the uncovered so many difficulties and finally led him to conclude Amarna letters, (3) Ugaritic texts, (4) texts from Aššur and that Canaan was a vague term.” 12 Hattusha, and (5) Egyptian texts and reliefs.
  • A Preliminary Study of the Inner Coffin and Mummy Cover Of

    A Preliminary Study of the Inner Coffin and Mummy Cover Of

    A PRELIMINARY STUDY OF THE INNER COFFIN AND MUMMY COVER OF NESYTANEBETTAWY FROM BAB EL-GUSUS (A.9) IN THE NATIONAL MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY, SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION, WASHINGTON, D.C. by Alec J. Noah A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts Major: Art History The University of Memphis May 2013 Copyright © 2013 Alec Noah All rights reserved ii For my parents iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First and foremost, I must thank the National Museum of Natural History, particularly the assistant collection managers, David Hunt and David Rosenthal. I would also like to thank my advisor, Dr. Nigel Strudwick, for his guidance, suggestions, and willingness to help at every step of this project, and my thesis committee, Dr. Lorelei H. Corcoran and Dr. Patricia V. Podzorski, for their detailed comments which improved the final draft of this thesis. I would like to thank Grace Lahneman for introducing me to the coffin of Nesytanebettawy and for her support throughout this entire process. I am also grateful for the Lahneman family for graciously hosting me in Maryland on multiple occasions while I examined the coffin. Most importantly, I would like to thank my parents. Without their support, none of this would have been possible. iv ABSTRACT Noah, Alec. M.A. The University of Memphis. May 2013. A Preliminary Study of the Inner Coffin and Mummy Cover of Nesytanebettawy from Bab el-Gusus (A.9) in the National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. Major Professor: Nigel Strudwick, Ph.D. The coffin of Nesytanebettawy (A.9) was retrieved from the second Deir el Bahari cache in the Bab el-Gusus tomb and was presented to the National Museum of Natural History in 1893.
  • The History of Ancient Egypt “Passionate, Erudite, Living Legend Lecturers

    The History of Ancient Egypt “Passionate, Erudite, Living Legend Lecturers

    “Pure intellectual stimulation that can be popped into Topic Subtopic the [audio or video player] anytime.” History Ancient History —Harvard Magazine The History of Ancient Egypt “Passionate, erudite, living legend lecturers. Academia’s best lecturers are being captured on tape.” —The Los Angeles Times The History “A serious force in American education.” —The Wall Street Journal of Ancient Egypt Course Guidebook Professor Bob Brier Long Island University Professor Bob Brier is an Egyptologist and Professor of Philosophy at the C. W. Post Campus of Long Island University. He is renowned for his insights into ancient Egypt. He hosts The Learning Channel’s popular Great Egyptians series, and his research was the subject of the National Geographic television special Mr. Mummy. A dynamic instructor, Professor Brier has received Long Island University’s David Newton Award for Teaching Excellence. THE GREAT COURSES® Corporate Headquarters 4840 Westfields Boulevard, Suite 500 Chantilly, VA 20151-2299 Guidebook USA Phone: 1-800-832-2412 www.thegreatcourses.com Cover Image: © Hemera/Thinkstock. Course No. 350 © 1999 The Teaching Company. PB350A PUBLISHED BY: THE GREAT COURSES Corporate Headquarters 4840 Westfi elds Boulevard, Suite 500 Chantilly, Virginia 20151-2299 Phone: 1-800-TEACH-12 Fax: 703-378-3819 www.thegreatcourses.com Copyright © The Teaching Company, 1999 Printed in the United States of America This book is in copyright. All rights reserved. Without limiting the rights under copyright reserved above, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in or introduced into a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form, or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise), without the prior written permission of The Teaching Company.
  • The Karnak Hypostyle Hall Project Field Report 2004-2005 by Peter J

    The Karnak Hypostyle Hall Project Field Report 2004-2005 by Peter J

    The Karnak Hypostyle Hall Project Field Report 2004-2005 By Peter J. Brand Introduction Collation of Facsimile Drawings of the Battle Reliefs of Ramesses II on the South Wall with Our field work was authorized by Egypt’s Su- Palimpsest of the Battle of Kadesh. preme Council of Antiquities and functioned with the cooperation of the Centre Franco-égyptien pour l’étude The main objective of the season was to com- des Temples de Karnak. We extend our thanks to our plete collation of war scenes on the south exterior wall other Egyptian and French colleagues: Dr. Zahi Hawas, of the Hypostyle Hall in order to produce facsimile President of the SCA, along with the entire Perma- drawings of these reliefs. Initial drawings of these war nent Committee which authorized our work. In Luxor, scenes were first made in 1995. We began collation of we are grateful to Mr. Ibrahim Sulliman, the Director the drawings in 1999 under the Project’s late director, of Karnak and Mr. Fawzy (our inspector); along with professor William J. Murnane. Our collation of the in- Nicolas Grimal and Emanuelle Laroche (scientific and scriptions on this wall was made more difficult by their field directors of the Centre). The expedition staff for poor state of preservation and the fact that part of the this season’s work included two epigraphists: the field wall is a palimpsest in stone with two sets of hieroglyph- director, Dr. Peter Brand of the University of Memphis, ic texts superimposed one atop the other. Tennessee and Dr. Suzanne Onstine from the Univer- sity of Arizona.
  • Was the Function of the Earliest Writing in Egypt Utilitarian Or Ceremonial? Does the Surviving Evidence Reflect the Reality?”

    Was the Function of the Earliest Writing in Egypt Utilitarian Or Ceremonial? Does the Surviving Evidence Reflect the Reality?”

    “Was the function of the earliest writing in Egypt utilitarian or ceremonial? Does the surviving evidence reflect the reality?” Article written by Marsia Sfakianou Chronology of Predynastic period, Thinite period and Old Kingdom..........................2 How writing began.........................................................................................................4 Scopes of early Egyptian writing...................................................................................6 Ceremonial or utilitarian? ..............................................................................................7 The surviving evidence of early Egyptian writing.........................................................9 Bibliography/ references..............................................................................................23 Links ............................................................................................................................23 Album of web illustrations...........................................................................................24 1 Map of Egypt. Late Predynastic Period-Early Dynastic (Grimal, 1994) Chronology of Predynastic period, Thinite period and Old Kingdom (from the appendix of Grimal’s book, 1994, p 389) 4500-3150 BC Predynastic period. 4500-4000 BC Badarian period 4000-3500 BC Naqada I (Amratian) 3500-3300 BC Naqada II (Gerzean A) 3300-3150 BC Naqada III (Gerzean B) 3150-2700 BC Thinite period 3150-2925 BC Dynasty 1 3150-2925 BC Narmer, Menes 3125-3100 BC Aha 3100-3055 BC
  • The Other Face of Augustus's Aggressive Inclination to Egypt

    The Other Face of Augustus's Aggressive Inclination to Egypt

    Journal of Association of Arab Universities for Tourism and Hospitality Volume 12 - June 2015 - No 1 - Pages: (35 : 56) The Other Face of Augustus’s Aggressive Inclination to Egypt Wahid Omran Lecturer in Tourist Guidance Dep., Faculty of Tourism and Hotels, Fayoum University Introduction The initial attitude of Octavian against Egypt is proved by his speech to his troops on the evening before the battle of Actium. Pride in his Roman birth is compared to the despicability of an Egyptian woman as an opponent, who is supported by Dio Cassius reference.1 "Alexandrians and Egyptians- what worse or what truer name could one apply to them?- who worship reptiles and beasts as gods, who embalm their own bodies to give them semblance of immortality, who are most reckless in effrontery but most feeble in courage, and worst of all are slaves to a woman and not to a man". Since The Roman poet Virgile (70- 19 B.C), 2 the Romans opposed the animal – cult of the Egyptians, and considered these gods as monsters.3 The Egyptian character of the Augustus's opponents is related to the Augustan propaganda, represented the Augustus's war against Antony and Cleopatra not only a civil war between Rome and Egypt, but like a struggle between the West and the East. Whose Mark Antony was a traitor joined the powers of the East, whereas Octavian's victory in Actium was not only for himself, but basically for Rome and the Romans. This struggle was described in literature's documents as a civil strife or a foreign war.4 Augustus also knew he had a compensated war against Antony and Cleopatra as a republican magistrate crushing Oriental despotism.5 He is supported by the Roman society ethics and the star of the sacred Caesar, on the other hand, Antony, once a great Roman commander-in-chief, but now supported by a foreign army and followed by unnamed Egyptian spouse.6 The Romans considered the battle not only a military, but either a religious one between the Roman and the Egyptian Pantheons.
  • Demotic Dictionary Project

    Demotic Dictionary Project

    oi.uchicago.edu PHILOLOGY DEMOTIC DICTIONARY PROJECT Janet H.Johnson This year, as for the past several years, the Demotic Dictionary staff concentrated on checking drafts of entries for individual letters in the Egyptian "alphabet" and preparing and entering computer scan copies of the actual Demotic words. The only student work­ ing on the project this year was Thomas Dousa, whose command of Egyptian and Greek and the extensive literature in both has allowed him to make major contributions to the checking and rewriting of first draft entries. Thanks to a very generous bequest from Professor and Mrs. George R. Hughes, we anticipate being able next year to hire a recent Ph.D. graduate as Research Associate to work full time on checking of draft and preparation of scans and copies. The checking and rewriting of first draft entries involves double checking of all in­ formation provided in the entry and the incorporation of several categories of informa­ tion that we decided to include after the first drafts had been written. Many of these categories are being added to provide social or cultural information as part of the "meaning" of a word. For example, whenever the "word" is the name of a deity, a refer­ ence is provided to every geographic location (e.g., a specific city or cemetery) with which the deity is associated in the texts of the corpus from which the Chicago Demotic Dictionary is being drawn. Similarly, whenever the "word" being discussed is the name of a geographic location, reference is made to all deities mentioned in the texts of our corpus in conjunction with that geographic location.
  • Reading G Uide

    Reading G Uide

    1 Reading Guide Introduction Pharaonic Lives (most items are on map on page 10) Bodies of Water Major Regions Royal Cities Gulf of Suez Faiyum Oasis Akhetaten Sea The Levant Alexandria Nile River Libya Avaris Nile cataracts* Lower Egypt Giza Nile Delta Nubia Herakleopolis Magna Red Sea Palestine Hierakonpolis Punt Kerma *Cataracts shown as lines Sinai Memphis across Nile River Syria Sais Upper Egypt Tanis Thebes 2 Chapter 1 Pharaonic Kingship: Evolution & Ideology Myths Time Periods Significant Artifacts Predynastic Origins of Kingship: Naqada Naqada I The Narmer Palette Period Naqada II The Scorpion Macehead Writing History of Maqada III Pharaohs Old Kingdom Significant Buildings Ideology & Insignia of Middle Kingdom Kingship New Kingdom Tombs at Abydos King’s Divinity Mythology Royal Insignia Royal Names & Titles The Book of the Heavenly Atef Crown The Birth Name Cow Blue Crown (Khepresh) The Golden Horus Name The Contending of Horus Diadem (Seshed) The Horus Name & Seth Double Crown (Pa- The Nesu-Bity Name Death & Resurrection of Sekhemty) The Two Ladies Name Osiris Nemes Headdress Red Crown (Desheret) Hem Deities White Crown (Hedjet) Per-aa (The Great House) The Son of Re Horus Bull’s tail Isis Crook Osiris False beard Maat Flail Nut Rearing cobra (uraeus) Re Seth Vocabulary Divine Forces demi-god heka (divine magic) Good God (netjer netjer) hu (divine utterance) Great God (netjer aa) isfet (chaos) ka-spirit (divine energy) maat (divine order) Other Topics Ramesses II making sia (Divine knowledge) an offering to Ra Kings’ power
  • Title 'Expanding the History of the Just

    Title 'Expanding the History of the Just

    Title ‘Expanding the History of the Just War: The Ethics of War in Ancient Egypt.’ Abstract This article expands our understanding of the historical development of just war thought by offering the first detailed analysis of the ethics of war in ancient Egypt. It revises the standard history of the just war tradition by demonstrating that just war thought developed beyond the boundaries of Europe and existed many centuries earlier than the advent of Christianity or even the emergence of Greco-Roman thought on the relationship between war and justice. It also suggests that the creation of a prepotent ius ad bellum doctrine in ancient Egypt, based on universal and absolutist claims to justice, hindered the development of ius in bello norms in Egyptian warfare. It is posited that this development prefigures similar developments in certain later Western and Near Eastern doctrines of just war and holy war. Acknowledgements My thanks to Anthony Lang, Jr. and Cian O’Driscoll for their insightful and instructive comments on an early draft of this article. My thanks also to the three anonymous reviewers and the editorial team at ISQ for their detailed feedback in preparing the article for publication. A version of this article was presented at the Stockholm Centre for the Ethics of War and Peace (June 2016), and I express my gratitude to all the participants for their feedback. James Turner Johnson (1981; 1984; 1999; 2011) has long stressed the importance of a historical understanding of the just war tradition. An increasing body of work draws our attention to the pre-Christian origins of just war thought.1 Nonetheless, scholars and politicians continue to overdraw the association between Christian political theology and the advent of just war thought (O’Driscoll 2015, 1).
  • II. 9 RELATIVE CHRONOLOGY of DYN. 21 Karl Jansen-Winkeln At

    II. 9 RELATIVE CHRONOLOGY of DYN. 21 Karl Jansen-Winkeln At

    II. 9 RELATIVE CHRONOLOGY OF DYN. 21 Karl Jansen-Winkeln At the beginning of Dyn. 21 Egypt was split in two, with two centres of power, each ruled individually. UE, whose northern frontier was located in the region of Herakleopolis, was governed by a military com- mander who, at the same time was HPA of Thebes.1 In texts and depictions some of these UE regents (Herihor, Pinudjem I and Menkheperre) assume in varying degrees attributes which are reserved for a king. Kings reigned in LE, but at least two of them (Psusennes and Amenemope) occasionally bear the title of “HPA”. Contemporaneous documents of which only a small number survived do not give any direct indication as to the reason for this partition of Egypt.2 The only large group of finds are the graves of the kings in Tanis and the col- lective interments in the Theban necropolis (including replacements and re-interments of older mummies). Among these Theban funeral sites various dated objects can be found, but unfortunately most dates are anonymous and not ascribed to any explicit regent. Of this twofold line of regents, Manetho lists only the kings of LE, namely (1) Smendes, (2) Psusennes [I], (3) Nepherkheres, (4) Amenophthis, (5) Osochor, (6) Psinaches, (7) Psusennes [II]. Contemporary documents contain ample reference of the kings Psusennes (P#-sb#-¢'j-m-nwt; only in LE), Amenemope ( Jmn-m-Jpt) and Siamun (Z#-Jmn) (both in LE and UE). The first two kings can be straightforwardly identified as Manetho’s Psusennes (I) and Amenophthis. A king named Smendes (Ns-b#-nb-ddt) is attested by only a few, undated inscriptions, but the history of Wenamun shows clearly that he was a contemporary of Herihor and thus the first king of Dyn.
  • Ugaritic Seal Metamorphoses As a Reflection of the Hittite Administration and the Egyptian Influence in the Late Bronze Age in Western Syria

    Ugaritic Seal Metamorphoses As a Reflection of the Hittite Administration and the Egyptian Influence in the Late Bronze Age in Western Syria

    UGARITIC SEAL METAMORPHOSES AS A REFLECTION OF THE HITTITE ADMINISTRATION AND THE EGYPTIAN INFLUENCE IN THE LATE BRONZE AGE IN WESTERN SYRIA The Institute of Economics and Social Sciences of Bilkent University by B. R. KABATIAROVA In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS in THE DEPARTMENT OF ARCHAEOLOGY AND HISTORY OF ART BILKENT UNIVERSITY ANKARA June 2006 To my family and Őzge I certify that I have read this thesis and that it is fully adequate, in scope and quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Arts in the Department of Archaeology and History of Art. -------------------------------------------- Dr. Marie-Henriette Gates Supervisor I certify that I have read this thesis and that it is fully adequate, in scope and quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Arts in the Department of Archaeology and History of Art. -------------------------------------------- Dr. Jacques Morin Examining Committee Member I certify that I have read this thesis and that it is fully adequate, in scope and quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Arts in the Department of Archaeology and History of Art. -------------------------------------------- Dr. Geoffrey Summers Examining Committee Member Approval of the Institute of Economics and Social Sciences ------------------------------------------- Dr. Erdal Erel Director ABSTRACT UGARITIC SEAL METAMORPHOSES AS A REFLECTION OF THE HITTITE ADMINISTRATION AND THE EGYPTIAN INFLUENCE IN THE LATE BRONZE AGE IN WESTERN SYRIA Kabatiarova, B.R. M.A., Department of Archaeology and History of Art Supervisor: Doc. Dr. Marie-Henriette Gates June 2006 This study explores the ways in which Hittite political control of Northern Syria in the LBA influenced and modified Ugaritic glyptic and methods of sealing documents.
  • Ancient Egyptian Chronology and the Book of Genesis

    Ancient Egyptian Chronology and the Book of Genesis

    Answers Research Journal 4 (2011):127–159. www.answersingenesis.org/arj/v4/ancient-egyptian-chronology-genesis.pdf Ancient Egyptian Chronology and the Book of Genesis Matt McClellan, [email protected] Abstract One of the most popular topics among young earth creationists and apologists is the relationship of the Bible with Ancient Egyptian chronology. Whether it concerns who the pharaoh of the Exodus was, the background of Joseph, or the identity of Shishak, many Christians (and non-Christians) have wondered how these two topics fit together. This paper deals with the question, “How does ancient Egyptian chronology correlate with the book of Genesis?” In answering this question it begins with an analysis of every Egyptian dynasty starting with the 12th Dynasty (this is where David Down places Moses) and goes back all the way to the so called “Dynasty 0.” After all the data is presented, this paper will look at the different possibilities that can be constructed concerning how long each of these dynasties lasted and how they relate to the biblical dates of the Great Flood, the Tower of Babel, and the Patriarchs. Keywords: Egypt, pharaoh, Patriarchs, chronology, Abraham, Joseph Introduction Kingdom) need to be revised. This is important During the past century some scholars have when considering the relationship between Egyptian proposed new ways of dating the events of ancient history and the Tower of Babel. The traditional dating history before c. 700 BC.1 In 1991 a book entitled of Ancient Egyptian chronology places its earliest Centuries of Darkness by Peter James and four of dynasties before the biblical dates of the Flood and his colleagues shook the very foundations of ancient confusion of the languages at Babel.