“Dissolute and Immoral Practices” the Court Martial of James T. Leonard
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Black Sailors During the War of 1812 Lauren Mccormack, 2005 Revised by Kate Monea and Carl Herzog, 2020
Black Sailors During the War of 1812 Lauren McCormack, 2005 Revised by Kate Monea and Carl Herzog, 2020 A publication of the USS Constitution Museum, Boston © 2020 USS Constitution Museum | usscm.org Black Sailors During the War of 1812 Lauren McCormack, 2005 Revised by Kate Monea and Carl Herzog, 2020 CONTENTS Introduction .............................................................1 Free Blacks in the Post-Revolutionary American North ........................2 Free Blacks in Boston, Massachusetts ........................................5 Black Participation in the Maritime Trade ....................................7 Life at Sea for Black Sailors in the early United States Navy ....................10 Black Sailors on USS Constitution ..........................................17 A publication of the USS Constitution Museum, Boston © 2020 USS Constitution Museum | usscm.org Introduction At the beginning of the nineteenth century, free black men from the northeastern United States, struggling to make their way in a highly discriminatory American society, went to sea in the merchant marine and the U.S. Navy, including aboard USS Constitution. By no means did shipboard life completely extract them from the prejudices of a white-dominated culture, but it often provided them with better opportunities than they had on land. Like their fellow white sailors, black seamen in the Early Republic could count on stable pay with the benefit of room and board. For many, sea service and its pay provided a path to a better life ashore. Because race was not specifically noted in U.S. Navy personnel records at the time, much remains unknown about these men. However, a survey of the status of life for free blacks on shore sheds light on why some may have found seafaring an attractive opportunity. -
Ships Down Through Theyears CNO TESTIFY BEFORE PAY COMMISSION 0Th Stress Uniqueness of Militaryservice
FEBRU RY 1978 NUMBER 733 FeaturesA WINE AND WATER hristening ships down through theyears CNO TESTIFY BEFORE PAY COMMISSION 0th stress uniqueness of militaryservice astering English football at the source urial at sea aboard USS Boulder (LST 1 190) I 22 US$ SHREVEPORT (LPD 12) , ship with a vital mission in today's Navy 27 MIL TARY SEALIFT COMMAND avy men and civilians working together at sea 34 IT'S A SAREX oiling enemy attempts to capture downed pilots 38 IT'S MORE THAN A GAME ommand interest is one key to advancement 42 NE\ 'SEA PAY PROPOSAL LAUNCHED lore dollars for longer service at sea Covers Front: Co lmander Ira H. Coen, Jr., has the conn aboard the nuclear-powered attack sub1 larine USS Hawkbill (SSN 666) off Hawaii. Photo by LT Franklin D. Peele. Back: Mrs. Iolph Briscoe, wife of theGovernor of Texas, christens the nuclear- powered g1 lded missile cruiser USS Texas (CGN 39). See page 4. Photo by PHAN William F. :lynn. Departmc 1ts 2 Curl !nts 37 Information Exchange 24 Beal rigs 48 Mail Buoy Chief of I aval Operations: Admiral James L. Holloway II I Staff: LT Bill Ray Chi! of Information: Rear Admiral David M. Cooney JOC Dan Guzman Dir. Print M Jia Div. (NIRA): Lieutenant John Alexander JO1 Jerry Atchison Editor: John F. Coleman JO1 (SS) Pete Sundberg News Editor: Joanne E. Dumene PH1 Terry Mitchell F Dduction Editor: Lieutenant Jeff Zakem 502 Davida Matthews Layout Editor: E. L. Fast 502 Dan Wheeler Art Editor: Michael Tuffli 503 Francis Bir Research .Editor: Catherine D. -
Few Americans in the 1790S Would Have Predicted That the Subject Of
AMERICAN NAVAL POLICY IN AN AGE OF ATLANTIC WARFARE: A CONSENSUS BROKEN AND REFORGED, 1783-1816 Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Jeffrey J. Seiken, M.A. * * * * * The Ohio State University 2007 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Professor John Guilmartin, Jr., Advisor Professor Margaret Newell _______________________ Professor Mark Grimsley Advisor History Graduate Program ABSTRACT In the 1780s, there was broad agreement among American revolutionaries like Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, and Alexander Hamilton about the need for a strong national navy. This consensus, however, collapsed as a result of the partisan strife of the 1790s. The Federalist Party embraced the strategic rationale laid out by naval boosters in the previous decade, namely that only a powerful, seagoing battle fleet offered a viable means of defending the nation's vulnerable ports and harbors. Federalists also believed a navy was necessary to protect America's burgeoning trade with overseas markets. Republicans did not dispute the desirability of the Federalist goals, but they disagreed sharply with their political opponents about the wisdom of depending on a navy to achieve these ends. In place of a navy, the Republicans with Jefferson and Madison at the lead championed an altogether different prescription for national security and commercial growth: economic coercion. The Federalists won most of the legislative confrontations of the 1790s. But their very success contributed to the party's decisive defeat in the election of 1800 and the abandonment of their plans to create a strong blue water navy. -
Essays Commemorating the 175Th Anni- Versary of the Battle of Lake Erie
Book Reviews 155 War on the Great Lakes: Essays Commemorating the 175th Anni- versary of the Battle of Lake Erie. Edited by William Jeffrey Welsh and David Curtis Skaggs. (Kent, Ohio: Kent State Uni- versity Press, 1991. Pp. vi, 154. Maps, tables, bibliographies, notes, index. Clothbound, $29.00; paperbound, $17.50.) This.smal1 (just over 100 pages of text), expensive book is a mixed bag. Composed of ten disparate essays, which came out of a 1988 conference in Windsor, Ontario, commemorating the battle of Lake Erie, the book is perhaps more useful for its bibliographic information than for its substantive essays. The introduction con- tains a page or two setting the stage for the conference, very short descriptions of the ten essays, and some editorial caveats. Each es- say runs about a dozen pages, with the first, by Gerald T. Altoff, giving a short, albeit lively, description of the battle itself. Unfor- tunately, there are no maps, no diagrams, no illustrations of any kind to assist the reader in understanding the actions. (In fact, it is not until the fourth essay that the reader encounters the book’s only map pertaining to the battle.) The essay by Frederick C. Drake is a fascinating, if arcane, accounting of the relative artillery strength of the two squadrons, in which Drake concludes that the American commander, Master Commandant Oliver Hazard Perry, not only had superiority in car- ronades but in long guns as well. Building on this contention, W. A. B. Douglas concludes that Perry’s British opposite, Captain Rob- ert Heriot Barclay, and his tiny navy did the best that they could and preserved the “honor of the flag.” Dennis Carter-Edwards’s es- say deals with the strategic necessity of the battle and the conse- quences of it. -
A Friendship Under Fire
Volume 3, Issue 6 I A Newsletter for the Supporters of the Hampton Roads Naval Museum A Friendship Under Fire The Confrontation Between Stephen Decatur and James Barron, Part 1 by Joe Mosier n March 22, 1820, two of the Tragically, the meeting could have been former friends. They had first served senior officers of the United avoided except for the manipulations of together in the wardroom of United States OStates Navy met on "the field of two other officers who acted as seconds. in 1798. Their later correspondence honor" at Bladensburg, Maryland. This The meeting between James Barron shows Third Lieutenant Barron acted as duel was the result of a long-standing and Stephen Decatur was in some a mentor to the new midshipman. Their feud based on an insult to a lady and respects not typical. Christopher McKee paths had crossed frequently in the small a naval battle that was not fought. pointed this out in his landmark study of navy of that era. In 1804, Decatur the early U.S. Navy, A Gentlemanly and Honorable Profession. "In spite of the misleading impression created by the Barron-Decatur duel, the practice of dueling was all but entirely confmed to the younger members of the officer corps." At the time of their confrontation, Barron was 51 years old and Decatur 41. By contrast, twelve of eighteen officers killed in duels before 1815 were midshipmen. This trend had worried Decatur, who was himself probably the most experienced in dueling among naval officers of his day. In 1809, while While respected by all in Hampton Roads, the Decatur commanded the frigate United One of the greatest heroes of the U.S. -
Attitudes Towards Privateering During the Era of the Early American Republic
ATTITUDES TOWARDS PRIVATEERING DURING THE ERA OF THE EARLY AMERICAN REPUBLIC A Senior Honors Thesis by James R. Holcomb IV Submitted to the Office of Honors Programs & Academic Scholarships Texas A&M University In partial fulfillment of the requirements of the UNIVERSITY UNDERGRADUATE RESEARCH FELLOWS April 2007 Major: History ii ABSTRACT Attitudes towards Privateering during the Era of the Early American Republic (April 2007) James R. Holcomb IV Department of History Texas A&M University Fellows Advisor: Dr. James C. Bradford Department of History Lacking sufficient funds to build and maintain a sizeable navy, the young United States was forced to employ privateers as a “stop-gap navy” in its struggles against stronger sea powers during the War for Independence, the Quasi War, and the War of 1812. Many American leaders opposed privateering on moral grounds, but felt compelled to employ it. Merchants and seamen were generally more supportive, wither because their usual employment, fishing and peaceful commerce, was denied them when enemies hovered outside American ports and began seizing American ships, or because privateering offered the prospect of quick and large profits. Sailors preferred service in iii privateers to enlisting in the navy because discipline tended to be less rigorous in privateers than in warships, privateers appeared safer since their captains generally tried to avoid combat with enemy men of war, and privateers offered the prospect of more prize money from the sale of captured ships. Officers in the Continental and United States Navy usually opposed privateering because privateers competed with them for recruits and for naval stores to fit their ships out for sea. -
The Naval War of 1812, Volume 3, Chapter 2
The Naval War of 1812: A Documentary History Volume III 1814–1815 Chesapeake Bay, Northern Lakes, and Pacific Ocean Part 5 of 7 Naval Historical Center Department of the Navy Washington, 2002 Electronically published by American Naval Records Society Bolton Landing, New York 2011 AS A WORK OF THE UNITED STATES FEDERAL GOVERNMENT THIS PUBLICATION IS IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN. 532 NORTHERN LAKES THEATER JANUARY 1814-JUNE 1815 533 left to guard the vessel and property retreated upon the approach of our Boats- as soon as the vessel was intirely consumed Lieutenant Gregory reem as ,:e have nothing to oppose so overwhelming a force and as this class of ves barked his Men without having permitted one of them to enter a House.- On sel IS so much beyond any thing which the Government contemplated when I finding the alarm so general he thought it prudent to cross the Lake immedi had th~ honor of your instructions in January last, I should not feel myself ately- he stopped one day at Oswego for refreshment and arrived here last authOrIzed even to prepare to build any thing to oppose Such a vessel without evening having performed a most difficult service with his usual gallantry and Special authority.- good conduct Mter I have been a sufficient length of time on the Lake to ascertain Lieutenant Gregory speaks in the highest terms of commendation of Sailing whether th.e. Enemy will fight me without his 84 Gun Ship and there should be Master Vaughan and Mr. Dixon, as well as the Men under his command for no probabIlIty .of a Peac~ ~th England it will -
The Epic Saga of Commodore David Porter
None So Daring copyright 2007 The Epic Saga of Commodore David Porter by Robert Porter Lynch CONTENTS SYNOPSIS 2 THEMES 3 APPEAL 3 BOOKS & MOVIES 3 STORY BOARD 4 Page 1 None So Daring copyright 2005 By Robert Porter Lynch Contact Information: Email: [email protected] Cell Phone: 401-640-1166 SYNOPSIS None So Daring is the epic saga of one of America’s most dashing heroes. Set between 1790 and 1830, it is the true story of the swashbuckling, visionary, powerful and often volatile Commodore David Porter. Each episode is based on historical evidence. Virtually forgotten to history, this story resurrects, with carefully researched accuracy, the remarkable and fascinating story of a man whose dramatic storybook career is virtually unparalleled in U.S. history for excitement, adventure, romance, and intrigue. Dashing, bold in every stroke, visionary, but hot-headed and impetuous, Commodore Porter’s naval adventures included fighting Arab terrorists in the Mediterranean and clashing with Caribbean pirates like Jean Laffite. Later, his escapades in the War of 1812 in the Pacific struck into the heart of the British Admiralty, triggering their wrath. During this Pacific odyssey, the touching adventures on the voyage of his young adopted son, David Glasgow Farragut, whose will lift the hearts of young and old alike. Porter’s role in bottling up the British fleet after their attack on Washington probably turned the tide of the War of 1812, preserving this nation’s liberty. His passionate and tempestuous love affair with Evalina, a Congressman’s daughter, brought him love, obsession, betrayal, and tragedy. Evalina was a real life Scarlett O’Hara. -
The Women Do Not Possess One Single Captivating
to feet m the stocks, their ofllrere and no re Our Baltimore tstvly column, from ihirty Ifty height, under paj, making Corr«apondea«e. Appointment* of PHlmuUn for New York. F*ir4.~ May 1ft.10 shares Old 0®lot r Railroad. HI; 19 da. mo* out, WW *r ud ] r» wli 011 hoarJ (»old 400 «p).had loft a crowned br a verdant capital of wavine branches, tarn to tbe government or people! Baltimore, May 15, 1819. The Washington correspondent of the Albany Vermont Central Railroad, M>ai 20 dividends Kast Boston Co. loat and X men by doaer.icB a abort time previous, off covered with long spiral leaves. Under this foliage, This is a suggestion. however. dlet1 net from the powe r Mates that the following postmasters have Journetbeen No. 4, $3. Island; Nov}, Ceo I hiunplin, CSwain, Newport. Kangaroo400 wh of and of government to employ its vessel* in commercial traf Scramble for Subordinate Offices.The St. Uaryy.I appointed within a few days. Two or three in the list FORKJON MARKETS aiace leaving Sydney (wheo she had 1.H25 wh); 4th, Sally bunches of blossoms, clusters green fruit, tic. of the and on® Aane, Brook*. NB. Ski tp NOP wli; lith, Harrison, Shearman, is another brvuch . are to in That question, Celebration Fire. Rechabites Theatricals you inuy hare already announced:. Thi.vidad nr Cuba, Mav 1. 1849. Priam of Rice 2 rt wh* since she I .ODD others advanced maturity, appear on which we confess ourselves jnst uow not posted up to email received from do, leaving Sydney (when had wh); furnishes beams andmingledrafters HEW YWHK APPOINTMENTS. -
ABSTRACT Nadine Kopp. the Influence of the War of 1812 on Great
ABSTRACT Nadine Kopp. The Influence of the War of 1812 on Great Lakes Shipbuilding. (Under the Direction of Dr. Bradley Rodgers) Department of History, January 2012. The purpose of this thesis is to determine whether the War of 1812 influenced ship construction techniques on the Great Lakes. During the War of 1812, much of the fighting in the North American theater of war primarily took place along the Niagara frontier and later along the St. Lawrence River. From the outset, both the Americans and British realized that gaining the upper hand in the conflict depended upon control of the Great Lakes. Critical to achieving the advantage was the development of a significant and powerful inland navy, which led to a shipbuilding race on both shores. The primary question raised surrounding Great Lakes ship construction in the early nineteenth century is whether or not this large scale event, the War of 1812, permanently influenced the way in which ships were constructed once the war was over. To answer this question, this study examines diagnostic attributes of archaeologically examined wrecks from the Great Lakes and Lake Champlain from before, during and after the War of 1812 to find similarities and difference in their design and construction The three time periods have been defined as the period before the War of 1812, from the French and Indian War (1754 to 1763), when British sailing ships first appeared on the Great Lakes, up to 1811; the period of the War of 1812 itself (1812-1814); and the period after the war leading up to the opening of the Welland Canal (1829) and the widespread use of steam engines on the Great Lakes (1830s-1840s). -
African Americans in the Battle of Lake Erie
African Americans in the Battle of Lake As a result, the northern lakes arena witnessed the hardest and bloodiest fighting of the war. If the U.S. Navy could control the waterways comprising much of the border between the United States and British Canada, then American forces would have ready- made avenues for invasion. Conversely, the lakes and rivers could just as easily serve as invasion corridors for the enemy-vulnerable passageways allowing the British to slash through to the soft underbelly of the United States. Whoever wielded control over the lakes possessed a powerful strategic and tactical advantage. The British, unhindered by the U.S. Navy, used the lakes as transportation routes for troops and supplies during the early months of the war. But the U.S. leadership recognized that warships were needed to form a protective shield along the country's northern and northwestern border, and by late 1812 a furious shipbuilding program had been inaugurated. By the summer of 1813, through new construction and the conversion of purchased merchant vessels, U.S. naval flotillas were cruising Lakes Erie, Ontario, and Champlain and, like their counterparts on the Atlantic, warships on the lakes berthed large numbers of African-American seamen. Black seamen sailed on American warships throughout the Quasi-War with France during the late 1790's and also in the wars against the Barbary pirates during the first decade of the 19th century. In the early years of the Navy the presence of black seamen on board Navy warships was unofficial to say the least. However, Navy captains during this period were responsible for crewing their own ships and most commanders knew that black seamen were just as well trained and disciplined as white seamen; at sea the color of a man's skin counted for much less than did his skills and abilities. -
Ffiis^I^ BSCOM& *?«—»
^ffiis^i^ BSCOM& *?«—» OF ALL OFFICERS AND AGENTS, CIVIL, MILITARY, AND NAVAL, IN THE SERVICE OF THE UNITED STATES, ON THE THIRTIETH SEPTEMBER, 1835. WITH THE NAMES, FORCE, AND CONDITION OF ALL SHIPS AND VESSELS BELONGING TO THE UNITED STATES, AND WHEN AND WHERE BUILT, TOGETHER WITH A CORRECT LIST OF THE PRESIDENTS, CASHIERS, AND DIRECTORS OF THE UNITED STATES BANK AND ITS BRANCHES. # TO WHICH IS APPENDED THE NAMES AND COMPENSATION OF ALL PRINTERS IN ANY WAY EMPLOYED BY CONGRESS, OR ANY DEPART MENT OR OFFICER OF GOVERNMENT. PREPARED AT THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE, In pursuance of Resolutions of Congress of April 27, 1816, and July 14, 1832. CITYfOF WASHINGTON.. PRINTED BY BLAIR <fc RIVES 1835. Resolution requiring4he Secretary of State to compile and print, once in every two years, a Register of all Officers and Agents, civil, military, and naval, in the service of the United States. Resolved, By the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That, once in two years, a Register, contain ing correct lists of all the officers and agents, civil, military, and naval, in the service of the United States, made up to the last day of September of each year in which a new Congress is to assemble, be compiled and printed, under the direc tion of the Secretary for the Department of State. And, to enable him to form such Register, he, for his own Department, and the Heads of the other Depart ments, respectively, shall, in due time, cause such lists as aforesaid, of all officers and agents, in their respective Departments, including clerks, cadets, and mid shipmen, to be made and lodged in the Office of the Department of State.