DOCSLIB.ORG

Subfactors-Jones.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Subfactors-Jones.Pdf Subfactors in Memory of Vaughan Jones Zhengwei Liu Tsinghua University Math-Science Literature Lecture Series November 23, 2020, Harvard CMSA and Tsinghua YMSC 1 / 32 Sir Vaughan Frederick Randal Jones, a great New Zealand mathematician, suddenly passed away at Nashville, Tennessee, in the US on September 6, 2020, due to an ear infection and complications. This talk is dedicated to my advisor Vaughan Jones. Jones initiated the modern theory of subfactors in early 1980s and investigated this area for his whole academic life. Subfactor theory has both deep and broad connections with various areas in mathematics and physics. I will review some highlights in the developments of subfactors, based on insightful examples{Jones style. I am sorry for not mentioning many experts who have made substantial contributions in this area. 2 / 32 2020 ! 1952 (Time Machine in the Japanese Cartoon \Doraemon") 3 / 32 Childhood ! B.S. & M.S. I Jones was born in Gisborne, New Zealand on December 31, 1952 to parents Jim Jones and Joan Jones (ne Collins). I He developed his lifelong interest in math and science at St. Peters School and Auckland Grammar School. I After graduating from the University of Auckland with a B.Sc. in 1972 and an M.Sc. with First Class Honours in 1973, he was awarded a Swiss Government Scholarship. 4 / 32 Marriage While pursuing his PhD at University of Geneva in Switzerland, Jones met his future wife, Martha, whom he forever called Wendy. They married in Wendy's hometown of Westfield, New Jersey in 1979. 5 / 32 Jones' PhD Thesis Jones got his Docteur`esSciences in Mathematics from the University of Geneva in 1979, under the supervision of Andr´e Haefliger and Alain Connes. In his thesis he classified outer actions of a finite group G on the 3 hyperfinite II1 factor R by the 3-cocyles H (G), inspired by Connes' classification of cyclic actions. If you have not heard of subfactors, here are two examples G R ⊆ R and R ⊆ R o G: Remark: The two subfactors are Fourier dual to each other. I will explain the terminology soon. 6 / 32 Answer: Subfactors, e.g. R ⊆ R o G, for a countable group G. I A subfactor is an inclusion of factors N ⊆ M, which can be regarded as an action of a \quantum group" G on N , even though we do not see G and its action directly. Factors and Subfactors A factor is a von Neumann algebra with trivial center. Example: B(H), bounded operators on a Hilbert space. Murray-von Neumann classified factors by types In, II1, II1, III. A factor of type II1 is infinite dimensional with a (unique) trace. Examples: L(K) (acting on L2(K)), for an i.c.c. group K. L( lim Sn) L(F2): n!1 Connes 1973: Hyperfinite () Amenablity () · · · Hyperfinite II1 factor R: unique, smallest and universal for amenable groups. Question: How to recover group symmetries from R? 7 / 32 Factors and Subfactors A factor is a von Neumann algebra with trivial center. Example: B(H), bounded operators on a Hilbert space. Murray-von Neumann classified factors by types In, II1, II1, III. A factor of type II1 is infinite dimensional with a (unique) trace. Examples: L(K) (acting on L2(K)), for an i.c.c. group K. L( lim Sn) L(F2): n!1 Connes 1973: Hyperfinite () Amenablity () · · · Hyperfinite II1 factor R: unique, smallest and universal for amenable groups. Question: How to recover group symmetries from R? Answer: Subfactors, e.g. R ⊆ R o G, for a countable group G. I A subfactor is an inclusion of factors N ⊆ M, which can be regarded as an action of a \quantum group" G on N , even though we do not see G and its action directly. 7 / 32 Answer: Invariants. I Scalar: Jones index; I Graph: principal graph; I Ring: fusion ring; I Representation Category: standard invariant. Invariants Constructing a subfactor N ⊆ M by generators may look simple from its definition. (v.s. constructing a subgroup of a group.) However, one would get the whole factor by a random choice of generators. Question: How to detect different subfactors? 8 / 32 Invariants Constructing a subfactor N ⊆ M by generators may look simple from its definition. (v.s. constructing a subgroup of a group.) However, one would get the whole factor by a random choice of generators. Question: How to detect different subfactors? Answer: Invariants. I Scalar: Jones index; I Graph: principal graph; I Ring: fusion ring; I Representation Category: standard invariant. 8 / 32 Jones Index 2 A II1 factor N forms a Hilbert space L (N ) measured by its trace. It is the 1-dim standard N −module, denoted by N N . Hilbert N -modules are classified by the dimension d 2 (0; 1]. The Jones index of a subfactor N ⊆ M of type II1 [M : N ] := dimN M: G Example: [R : R ] = [R o G : R] = jGj. Example: [R ⊗ M2(C): R] = 4. Theorem (Jones index 1983) π f[M : N ]g = 4 cos2 : k 2 + [ [4; 1]: k + 2 N The Jones index below 4 are \quantum". Jones: The most challenging part is constructing these subfactors. 9 / 32 Jones Subfactors and Temperley-Lieb Algebras Subfactor with index λ ! Temperley-Lieb algebra TL(λ): 2 ∗ ei = ei = ei ; ei ej = ej ei ; ji − jj ≥ 2; −1 ei ei±1ei = λ ei : It has a Markov trace τ, −1 τ(xen) = λ τ(x); 8x 2 TLn: where TLn is the subalgebra generated by fei : 1 ≤ i ≤ n − 1g. 2 π For a Jones index λ = 4 cos k+2 , τ is positive semi-definite, and fei : i ≥ ng generate a factor Rn, (of hyperfinite type II1), by GNS construction. The subfactor R2 ⊆ R1 has Jones index λ. 10 / 32 Braid Group πi Braid Group: λ = (q + q−1)2, q = e k+2 , q σ = −q2e + ; i i (q + q−1) σi σj = σj σi ; ji − jj ≥ 2; σi σi+1σi = σi+1σi σi+1: th th Pictorial representation: σi braids the i and i + 1 strings. σ = ; σ−1 = ; Reidemeister move II: = ; Reidemeister move III: = . Remark: Jones constructed braid group representations and developed deep connections with integrable models and Drinfeld-Jimbo quantum groups. 11 / 32 Jones Polynomial Jones met Birman in 1984: Markov trace on the braid group ) knot invariant It was surprising that the Markov trace naturally comes from the trace of the II1 factor, τ(xσn) = τ(x); 8x 2 TLn; −! = ; (Reidemeister move I) therefore leading to a knot invariant, well-known as the Jones polynomial, by which Jones answered a series of old questions in knot theory in 1985. = t + t3 − t4: = t−1 + t−3 − t−4: Reflection: t ! t−1. 12 / 32 Fields Medal Jones was awarded the Fields Medal at Kyoto in 1990 for these breakthroughs. 13 / 32 Quantum Symmetries The early work of Jones in 1980's led surprising connections not only between von Neumann algebras and knot theory, but also quantum groups, lower dimensional topology, integrable systems, algebraic/conformal/topological quantum field theory. (AQFT, CFT, TQFT) The most surprising connection was Witten's interpretation of Jones polynomial (at roots of unity) as a path integral in Chern-Simon theory. These connections have deep influence in development of various modern areas of mathematics, such as quantum topology. Subfactors capture quantum symmetries, beyond group symmetries. 14 / 32 Yes, it is very rich for finite-index subfactors (of type II1). It includes the unitary representation theory of finite groups and quantum groups. Representation Ψ (Amenable) (Amenable) Subfactor Standard Invariant Reconstruction Φ Example: Jones subfactors with index λ ≤ 4 ! TL(λ). Popa 1994: ΨΦ = I and ΦΨ = I . An amenable subfactor can be reconstructed from its standard invariant. (Quantum Tannaka-Krein duality) Representation Theory of Subfactors Is there an interesting representation theory for subfactors? 15 / 32 Representation Theory of Subfactors Is there an interesting representation theory for subfactors? Yes, it is very rich for finite-index subfactors (of type II1). It includes the unitary representation theory of finite groups and quantum groups. Representation Ψ (Amenable) (Amenable) Subfactor Standard Invariant Reconstruction Φ Example: Jones subfactors with index λ ≤ 4 ! TL(λ). Popa 1994: ΨΦ = I and ΦΨ = I . An amenable subfactor can be reconstructed from its standard invariant. (Quantum Tannaka-Krein duality) 15 / 32 Yes, non-amenable subfactors, precisely free-group subfactors. Representation Ψ L(F1) Subfactor Standard Invariant Reconstruction ΦPS Popa introduced standard λ-lattices as an axiomatization of the standard invariant in 1995. Popa-Shlyakhtenko 2003: All standard invariants come from subfactors of L(F1), ΨΦPS = I . Free-Group Subfactors The reconstruction does not work for TL(λ), λ > 4. 2 ∗ −1 ei = ei = ei ; ei ej = ej ei ; ji − jj ≥ 2; ei ei±1ei = λ ei : Markov trace τ is positive, but fei : i ≥ ng do not generate a factor. Question: Is TL(λ) a standard invariant of a subfactor with index λ? 16 / 32 Free-Group Subfactors The reconstruction does not work for TL(λ), λ > 4. 2 ∗ −1 ei = ei = ei ; ei ej = ej ei ; ji − jj ≥ 2; ei ei±1ei = λ ei : Markov trace τ is positive, but fei : i ≥ ng do not generate a factor. Question: Is TL(λ) a standard invariant of a subfactor with index λ? Yes, non-amenable subfactors, precisely free-group subfactors. Representation Ψ L(F1) Subfactor Standard Invariant Reconstruction ΦPS Popa introduced standard λ-lattices as an axiomatization of the standard invariant in 1995. Popa-Shlyakhtenko 2003: All standard invariants come from subfactors of L(F1), ΨΦPS = I . 16 / 32 Subfactors, Free Probability, Random Matrices The reconstruction maps of Popa, Popa-Shlyakhtenko come from Voiculescu's free probability theory.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Forked Temperley–Lieb Algebras and Intermediate Subfactors
    Journal of Functional Analysis 247 (2007) 477–491 www.elsevier.com/locate/jfa Forked Temperley–Lieb algebras and intermediate subfactors Pinhas Grossman Department of Mathematics, Vanderbilt University, USA Received 23 October 2006; accepted 16 March 2007 Available online 26 April 2007 Communicated by D. Voiculescu Abstract We consider noncommuting pairs P , Q of intermediate subfactors of an irreducible, finite-index inclusion N ⊂ M of II1 factors such that P and Q are supertransitive with Jones index less than 4 over N.Weshow that up to isomorphism of the standard invariant, there is a unique such pair corresponding to each even [ : ]= 2 π [ : ]= 2 π value P N 4cos 2n but none for the odd values P N 4cos 2n+1 . We also classify the angle values which occur between pairs of intermediate subfactors with small index over their intersection: if [ : ] [ : ] −1 1 P N , Q N < 4, then the unique nontrivial angle value is always cos [P : N]−1 . © 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Keywords: Von Neumann algebras; Subfactors; Planar algebras; Intermediate subfactors 1. Introduction A fundamental example of a subfactor is the fixed-point algebra of an outer action of a finite group on a von Neumann algebra with trivial center. In this case the structure of the subfactor is determined by the structure of the group. One then thinks of a general subfactor as a “quantum” version of a finite group, and subfactor theory as a “non-commutative Galois theory.” In this spirit it is natural to consider an intermediate subfactor N ⊂ P ⊂ M as an analogue of a subgroup, and indeed, the intermediate subfactors of the fixed-point subfactor of an action of a finite group are precisely the fixed-point subfactors of its subgroups.
    [Show full text]
  • FIELDS MEDAL for Mathematical Efforts R
    Recognizing the Real and the Potential: FIELDS MEDAL for Mathematical Efforts R Fields Medal recipients since inception Year Winners 1936 Lars Valerian Ahlfors (Harvard University) (April 18, 1907 – October 11, 1996) Jesse Douglas (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (July 3, 1897 – September 7, 1965) 1950 Atle Selberg (Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton) (June 14, 1917 – August 6, 2007) 1954 Kunihiko Kodaira (Princeton University) (March 16, 1915 – July 26, 1997) 1962 John Willard Milnor (Princeton University) (born February 20, 1931) The Fields Medal 1966 Paul Joseph Cohen (Stanford University) (April 2, 1934 – March 23, 2007) Stephen Smale (University of California, Berkeley) (born July 15, 1930) is awarded 1970 Heisuke Hironaka (Harvard University) (born April 9, 1931) every four years 1974 David Bryant Mumford (Harvard University) (born June 11, 1937) 1978 Charles Louis Fefferman (Princeton University) (born April 18, 1949) on the occasion of the Daniel G. Quillen (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (June 22, 1940 – April 30, 2011) International Congress 1982 William P. Thurston (Princeton University) (October 30, 1946 – August 21, 2012) Shing-Tung Yau (Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton) (born April 4, 1949) of Mathematicians 1986 Gerd Faltings (Princeton University) (born July 28, 1954) to recognize Michael Freedman (University of California, San Diego) (born April 21, 1951) 1990 Vaughan Jones (University of California, Berkeley) (born December 31, 1952) outstanding Edward Witten (Institute for Advanced Study,
    [Show full text]
  • Fall 2020 Issue
    MATHEMATICS + BERKELEY Fall 2020 IN THIS ISSUE Letter from the Chair 2 Department News 4 Happy Hours, New Horizons 3 Grad and Undergrad News 5 Prize New Faculty and Staff 7 Chair Michael Hutchings (PhD, Harvard, 1998) has been a member of the math faculty since 2001. His research is in low dimension- al and symplectic geometry and topology. He became Chair in Fall 2019. Dear Friends of Berkeley Math, Due to Covid-19, this last year has been quite extraordinary for almost everyone. I have been deeply moved by the enormous efforts of members of our department to make the most of the The department’s weekly afternoon tea in virtual 1035 Evans Hall on gather.town. Some attendees are dressed as vampires and pumpkins, others are playing pictionary. circumstances and continue our excellence in teaching and research. rejoined the department as an Assistant Teaching Professor. Yingzhou Li, who works in Applied Mathematics, and Ruix- We switched to remote teaching in March with just two days iang Zhang, who works in Analysis, will join the department of preparation time, and for the most part will be teaching as Assistant Professors in Spring and Fall 2021, respectively. remotely at least through Spring 2021. As anyone who teach- es can probably tell you, teaching online is no easier than And we need to grow our faculty further, in order to meet very teaching in person, and often much more difficult. However, high teaching demand. In Spring 2020 we had over 900 mathe- developing online courses has also given us an opportunity to matics majors, and we awarded a record 458 undergraduate de- rethink how we can teach and interact with students.
    [Show full text]
  • THÔNG TIN TOÁN HỌC Tháng 9 Năm 2014 Tập 18 Số 3 Thông Tin Toán Học (Lưu Hành Nội Bộ)
    Hội Toán Học Việt Nam THÔNG TIN TOÁN HỌC Tháng 9 Năm 2014 Tập 18 Số 3 Thông Tin Toán Học (Lưu hành nội bộ) Tổng biên tập Bản tin Thông Tin Toán Học nhằm ∙ ∙ Ngô Việt Trung mục đích phản ánh các sinh hoạt chuyên môn trong cộng đồng toán học Phó tổng biên tập Việt Nam và quốc tế. Bản tin ra thường ∙ kỳ 4 số trong một năm. Nguyễn Thị Lê Hương Thư ký tòa soạn ∙ Đoàn Trung Cường Thể lệ gửi bài: Bài viết bằng tiếng Việt. ∙ Tất cả các bài, thông tin về sinh hoạt Ban biên tập ∙ toán học ở các khoa (bộ môn) toán, Trần Nguyên An về hướng nghiên cứu hoặc trao đổi về Đào Phương Bắc phương pháp nghiên cứu và giảng dạy Trần Nam Dũng đều được hoan nghênh. Bản tin cũng Trịnh Thanh Đèo nhận đăng các bài giới thiệu tiềm năng Đào Thị Thu Hà khoa học của các cơ sở cũng như các Đoàn Thế Hiếu bài giới thiệu các nhà toán học. Bài viết Nguyễn An Khương xin gửi về tòa soạn theo email hoặc địa Lê Công Trình chỉ ở trên. Nếu bài được đánh máy tính, xin gửi kèm theo file với phông chữ Nguyễn Chu Gia Vượng unicode. Địa chỉ liên hệ ∙ Bản tin: Thông Tin Toán Học Viện Toán Học 18 Hoàng Quốc Việt, 10307 Hà Nội Email: [email protected] Trang web: http://www.vms.org.vn/ttth/ttth.htm c Hội Toán Học Việt Nam ○ Ảnh bìa 1. Xem trang 25 Trang web của Hội Toán học: Nguồn: Internet http://www.vms.org.vn 1 Cảm nhận về Đại hội Toán học Quốc tế tại Seoul Ngô Việt Trung (Viện Toán học) Năm 2009 GS Lovasz và GS Groetschel, - Tiến hành các nỗ lực đặc biệt nhằm vận Chủ tịch và Tổng thư ký Liên đoàn toán động mọi công dân trong mọi tổ chức, học thế giới đến thăm Việt Nam.
    [Show full text]
  • The Jones-Witten Invariants of Knots Astérisque, Tome 189-190 (1990), Séminaire Bourbaki, Exp
    Astérisque MICHAEL ATIYAH The Jones-Witten invariants of knots Astérisque, tome 189-190 (1990), Séminaire Bourbaki, exp. no 715, p. 7-16 <http://www.numdam.org/item?id=SB_1989-1990__32__7_0> © Société mathématique de France, 1990, tous droits réservés. L’accès aux archives de la collection « Astérisque » (http://smf4.emath.fr/ Publications/Asterisque/) implique l’accord avec les conditions générales d’uti- lisation (http://www.numdam.org/conditions). Toute utilisation commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infraction pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit contenir la présente mention de copyright. Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques http://www.numdam.org/ Seminaire BOURBAKI novembre 1989 42eme annee, 1989-90, n° 715 THE JONES-WITTEN INVARIANTS OF KNOTS par Michael ATIYAH 1. INTRODUCTION One of the most remarkable developments of recent years has been the work initiated by Vaughan Jones [2] [3] on knot invariants. This has all the hallmarks of great mathematics. It produces simple new invariants which solve classical problems and it involves a very wide range of ideas and techniques from practically all branches of mathematics and physics. Here is a list of the areas which have been significantly involved in the theory up to the present : combinatorics, group representations, algebraic geom- etry, differential geometry, differential equations, topology, Von Neumann algebras, statistical mechanics, quantum field theory..Moreover the subject continues to develop rapidly and a final picture has not yet emerged. Given this very wide field I have to be very selective for a one-hour presentation. I will concentrate on some aspects and I shall have to omit all the technicalities.
    [Show full text]
  • Oberwolfach Jahresbericht Annual Report 2008 Herausgeber / Published By
    titelbild_2008:Layout 1 26.01.2009 20:19 Seite 1 Oberwolfach Jahresbericht Annual Report 2008 Herausgeber / Published by Mathematisches Forschungsinstitut Oberwolfach Direktor Gert-Martin Greuel Gesellschafter Gesellschaft für Mathematische Forschung e.V. Adresse Mathematisches Forschungsinstitut Oberwolfach gGmbH Schwarzwaldstr. 9-11 D-77709 Oberwolfach-Walke Germany Kontakt http://www.mfo.de [email protected] Tel: +49 (0)7834 979 0 Fax: +49 (0)7834 979 38 Das Mathematische Forschungsinstitut Oberwolfach ist Mitglied der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft. © Mathematisches Forschungsinstitut Oberwolfach gGmbH (2009) JAHRESBERICHT 2008 / ANNUAL REPORT 2008 INHALTSVERZEICHNIS / TABLE OF CONTENTS Vorwort des Direktors / Director’s Foreword ......................................................................... 6 1. Besondere Beiträge / Special contributions 1.1 Das Jahr der Mathematik 2008 / The year of mathematics 2008 ................................... 10 1.1.1 IMAGINARY - Mit den Augen der Mathematik / Through the Eyes of Mathematics .......... 10 1.1.2 Besuch / Visit: Bundesministerin Dr. Annette Schavan ............................................... 17 1.1.3 Besuche / Visits: Dr. Klaus Kinkel und Dr. Dietrich Birk .............................................. 18 1.2 Oberwolfach Preis / Oberwolfach Prize ....................................................................... 19 1.3 Oberwolfach Vorlesung 2008 .................................................................................... 27 1.4 Nachrufe ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Top Mathematics Award
    Fields told me and which I later verified in Sweden, namely, that Nobel hated the mathematician Mittag- Leffler and that mathematics would not be one of the do- mains in which the Nobel prizes would The Top Mathematics be available." Award Whatever the reason, Nobel had lit- tle esteem for mathematics. He was Florin Diacuy a practical man who ignored basic re- search. He never understood its impor- tance and long term consequences. But Fields did, and he meant to do his best John Charles Fields to promote it. Fields was born in Hamilton, Ontario in 1863. At the age of 21, he graduated from the University of Toronto Fields Medal with a B.A. in mathematics. Three years later, he fin- ished his Ph.D. at Johns Hopkins University and was then There is no Nobel Prize for mathematics. Its top award, appointed professor at Allegheny College in Pennsylvania, the Fields Medal, bears the name of a Canadian. where he taught from 1889 to 1892. But soon his dream In 1896, the Swedish inventor Al- of pursuing research faded away. North America was not fred Nobel died rich and famous. His ready to fund novel ideas in science. Then, an opportunity will provided for the establishment of to leave for Europe arose. a prize fund. Starting in 1901 the For the next 10 years, Fields studied in Paris and Berlin annual interest was awarded yearly with some of the best mathematicians of his time. Af- for the most important contributions ter feeling accomplished, he returned home|his country to physics, chemistry, physiology or needed him.
    [Show full text]
  • Issue 118 ISSN 1027-488X
    NEWSLETTER OF THE EUROPEAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY S E European M M Mathematical E S Society December 2020 Issue 118 ISSN 1027-488X Obituary Sir Vaughan Jones Interviews Hillel Furstenberg Gregory Margulis Discussion Women in Editorial Boards Books published by the Individual members of the EMS, member S societies or societies with a reciprocity agree- E European ment (such as the American, Australian and M M Mathematical Canadian Mathematical Societies) are entitled to a discount of 20% on any book purchases, if E S Society ordered directly at the EMS Publishing House. Recent books in the EMS Monographs in Mathematics series Massimiliano Berti (SISSA, Trieste, Italy) and Philippe Bolle (Avignon Université, France) Quasi-Periodic Solutions of Nonlinear Wave Equations on the d-Dimensional Torus 978-3-03719-211-5. 2020. 374 pages. Hardcover. 16.5 x 23.5 cm. 69.00 Euro Many partial differential equations (PDEs) arising in physics, such as the nonlinear wave equation and the Schrödinger equation, can be viewed as infinite-dimensional Hamiltonian systems. In the last thirty years, several existence results of time quasi-periodic solutions have been proved adopting a “dynamical systems” point of view. Most of them deal with equations in one space dimension, whereas for multidimensional PDEs a satisfactory picture is still under construction. An updated introduction to the now rich subject of KAM theory for PDEs is provided in the first part of this research monograph. We then focus on the nonlinear wave equation, endowed with periodic boundary conditions. The main result of the monograph proves the bifurcation of small amplitude finite-dimensional invariant tori for this equation, in any space dimension.
    [Show full text]
  • Fighting for Tenure the Jenny Harrison Case Opens Pandora's
    Calendar of AMS Meetings and Conferences This calendar lists all meetings and conferences approved prior to the date this issue insofar as is possible. Instructions for submission of abstracts can be found in the went to press. The summer and annual meetings are joint meetings with the Mathe­ January 1993 issue of the Notices on page 46. Abstracts of papers to be presented at matical Association of America. the meeting must be received at the headquarters of the Society in Providence, Rhode Abstracts of papers presented at a meeting of the Society are published in the Island, on or before the deadline given below for the meeting. Note that the deadline for journal Abstracts of papers presented to the American Mathematical Society in the abstracts for consideration for presentation at special sessions is usually three weeks issue corresponding to that of the Notices which contains the program of the meeting, earlier than that specified below. Meetings Abstract Program Meeting# Date Place Deadline Issue 890 t March 18-19, 1994 Lexington, Kentucky Expired March 891 t March 25-26, 1994 Manhattan, Kansas Expired March 892 t April8-10, 1994 Brooklyn, New York Expired April 893 t June 16-18, 1994 Eugene, Oregon April4 May-June 894 • August 15-17, 1994 (96th Summer Meeting) Minneapolis, Minnesota May 17 July-August 895 • October 28-29, 1994 Stillwater, Oklahoma August 3 October 896 • November 11-13, 1994 Richmond, Virginia August 3 October 897 • January 4-7, 1995 (101st Annual Meeting) San Francisco, California October 1 December March 4-5, 1995
    [Show full text]
  • Vaughan Jones Obituary Operators Are Transformations of a Space Jones Grew Upinauckland, Newzealand
    Obituary Vaughan Jones (1952–2020) Mathematician whose invention connected knots to quantum physics. n 1994, mathematician Vaughan Jones knots from their mirror images. It was the kind walked on stage to address the Italian of tool that topologists had been seeking for national academy in Rome’s Palazzo decades. Soon, the polynomial and its refine- Corsini, lit a cigar and began to blow smoke ments helped to solve long-standing problems, rings. With a mischievous grin, he told some of which had been formulated in the late Ithe assembled academics, “When I did this in nineteenth century by Peter Guthrie Tait — the Berkeley, I almost lost my job.” smoke-ring pioneer. Researchers also found a Jones had little time for the stuffy halls of plethora of connections between knot theory academia. He cared about the study of knots, a and physics. Jones investigated connections field launched by nineteenth-century physicists with statistical mechanics, the study of aver- experimenting with smoke rings. In 1990, he aged properties of large numbers of particles. became the first New Zealander to be awarded The most surprising link came in 1989. Theo- the Fields Medal — for an invention that revo- retical physicist Edward Witten at the Institute lutionized the field of topology, the branch of for Advanced Study in Princeton, New Jersey, maths that studies knots and other shapes. He showed that the polynomial can be interpreted attended the solemn ceremony wearing the as a feature of the quantum physics of a uni- jersey of New Zealand’s national rugby team. verse with simplified laws of nature and just “He was larger than life in many ways, but at the two dimensions of space.
    [Show full text]
  • Problems in Low-Dimensional Topology
    Problems in Low-Dimensional Topology Edited by Rob Kirby Berkeley - 22 Dec 95 Contents 1 Knot Theory 7 2 Surfaces 85 3 3-Manifolds 97 4 4-Manifolds 179 5 Miscellany 259 Index of Conjectures 282 Index 284 Old Problem Lists 294 Bibliography 301 1 2 CONTENTS Introduction In April, 1977 when my first problem list [38,Kirby,1978] was finished, a good topologist could reasonably hope to understand the main topics in all of low dimensional topology. But at that time Bill Thurston was already starting to greatly influence the study of 2- and 3-manifolds through the introduction of geometry, especially hyperbolic. Four years later in September, 1981, Mike Freedman turned a subject, topological 4-manifolds, in which we expected no progress for years, into a subject in which it seemed we knew everything. A few months later in spring 1982, Simon Donaldson brought gauge theory to 4-manifolds with the first of a remarkable string of theorems showing that smooth 4-manifolds which might not exist or might not be diffeomorphic, in fact, didn’t and weren’t. Exotic R4’s, the strangest of smooth manifolds, followed. And then in late spring 1984, Vaughan Jones brought us the Jones polynomial and later Witten a host of other topological quantum field theories (TQFT’s). Physics has had for at least two decades a remarkable record for guiding mathematicians to remarkable mathematics (Seiberg–Witten gauge theory, new in October, 1994, is the latest example). Lest one think that progress was only made using non-topological techniques, note that Freedman’s work, and other results like knot complements determining knots (Gordon- Luecke) or the Seifert fibered space conjecture (Mess, Scott, Gabai, Casson & Jungreis) were all or mostly classical topology.
    [Show full text]
  • Braids: a Survey
    BRAIDS: A SURVEY Joan S. Birman ∗ Tara E. Brendle † e-mail [email protected] e-mail [email protected] December 2, 2004 Abstract This article is about Artin’s braid group Bn and its role in knot theory. We set our- selves two goals: (i) to provide enough of the essential background so that our review would be accessible to graduate students, and (ii) to focus on those parts of the subject in which major progress was made, or interesting new proofs of known results were discovered, during the past 20 years. A central theme that we try to develop is to show ways in which structure first discovered in the braid groups generalizes to structure in Garside groups, Artin groups and surface mapping class groups. However, the liter- ature is extensive, and for reasons of space our coverage necessarily omits many very interesting developments. Open problems are noted and so-labelled, as we encounter them. A guide to computer software is given together with a 10 page bibliography. Contents 1 Introduction 3 1.1 Bn and Pn viaconfigurationspaces . .. .. .. .. .. .. 3 1.2 Bn and Pn viageneratorsandrelations . 4 1.3 Bn and Pn asmappingclassgroups ...................... 5 1.4 Some examples where braiding appears in mathematics, unexpectedly . 7 1.4.1 Algebraicgeometry............................ 7 1.4.2 Operatoralgebras ............................ 8 1.4.3 Homotopygroupsofspheres. 9 1.4.4 Robotics.................................. 10 1.4.5 Publickeycryptography. 10 2 From knots to braids 12 2.1 Closedbraids ................................... 12 2.2 Alexander’sTheorem.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 13 2.3 Markov’sTheorem ................................ 17 ∗The first author acknowledges partial support from the U.S.National Science Foundation under grant number 0405586.
    [Show full text]