Los Bolandistas Ante El Santo of Icio

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Los Bolandistas Ante El Santo of Icio ISSN: 1697-4328 BÁRBARA SANTIAGO MEDINA RECIBIDO: 4/05/11 ¿HEREJÍA O DIFAMACIÓN?: LOS BOLANDISTAS ANTE EL SANTO OFICIO (1691-1715)Evaluado: 19/05/11 Aceptado: 20/06/11 ¿HEREJÍA O DIFAMACIÓN?: LoS BoLANDISTAS ANTE EL SANTo ofICIo (1691-1715) HERESY OR DEFAMATION?: THE BoLLANDISTS UNDEr THE EyE of THE HoLLy offICE (1691-1715) BÁRBARA SANTIAGO MEDINA Universidad Complutense de Madrid resumen:Tiempo después de que el jesuita Héribert Rosweyde (1569-1629) falleciera en Amberes, sin dar inicio a la publicación más ambiciosa que sobre hagiografía se había proyectado hasta el momento, el también jesuita Jean Bolland (1596-1665) fue cometido por sus superiores para abordar la edición de la obra. Así nacieron las “Acta Sanctorum”, cuya edición prosiguió hasta 1940 de la mano de los colaboradores y sucesores de Bolland: los Bolandistas. Pero, en 1691, la Orden de Nuestra Señora del Monte Carmelo denunció la publicación y a sus autores ante la Inquisición, motivando su condena en todos los territorios donde el Santo Oficio hispano ejercía su influencia. El presente artículo pretende ahondar en el desarrollo del conflicto que, ante la en ocasiones pasiva mirada del Santo Oficio y con el contenido de las “Acta Sanctorum” como excusa, enfrentó a jesuitas y carmelitas entre los años 1691 y 1715. Palabras Clave:Inquisición española, Censura, Hagiografía. Abstract:Because of his duties, the jesuit Héribert Rosweyde (1569-1629) died without beginning the edition of the most ambitious hagiographic project to date. Jean Bolland (1596-1665), who was also a member of the Society of Jesus, was commissioned to start the publication of the books. This is why “Acta Sanctorum”, a collection of works launched from 1643 to 1940, exists. After Jean Bolland’s death, the project was assumed by his collaborators and successors, called “the Bollandists”. In spite of the significance of this venture, the Order of the Brothers of Our Lady of Mount Carmel denounced to the Inquisition not only some volumes of the “Acta Sanctorum”, but also its authors. They were all condemned because of their supposed heretical propositions. This paper tries to explain the course of conflict between Carmelites and Jesuits from 1691 to 1715. And this was a dispute in which the Holly Office was involved in some different ways. Key Words:Spanish Inquisition, Censorship, Hagiography. 1. INTRODUCCIÓN: LA OBRA DE ROSWEYDE Héribert Rosweyde nació en Utrecht en 1569 y, en 1588, ingresó en el noviciado de la Com- pañía de Jesús en Tournai. Estudió Filosofía en Douai (donde posteriormente ejerció como pro- fesor de Retórica) y Teología en Lovaina. En 1599 fue ordenado sacerdote en la misma Douai, después de lo cual fue destinado a Amberes como profesor. Y es precisamente este el lugar desde DOCUMENTA & INSTRUMENTA, 9 (2011), PP. 75-97 75 http://dx.doi.org/10.5209/rev_DOCU.2011.v9.38066 BÁRBARA SANTIAGO MEDINA ¿HEREJÍA O DIFAMACIÓN?: LOS BOLANDISTAS ANTE EL SANTO OFICIO (1691-1715) el cual, en 1603, Rosweyde hizo partícipes a los superiores de su Orden de un proyecto sobre el que llevaba un tiempo recapacitando: escribir una recopilación de vidas de santos, tan completa como fuese posible, basada en fuentes manuscritas conservadas1. Ciertamente, la temática de una publicación como la que proponía Rosweyde no resultaba original en su época. De hecho, una de las obras hagiográficas más conocidas y utilizadas durante la Edad Moderna fue “De probatis sanctorum historiis”, confeccionada por el cartujo alemán Lau- renz Sauer (1522-1578), y cuyos seis volúmenes vieron la luz en Colonia entre 1570 y 15752. Ésta seguía el mismo planteamiento organizativo que luego se verá en las “Acta sanctorum”, es decir, la articulación del contenido en torno al calendario litúrgico, en virtud del cual se iban presen- tando, de forma sucesiva, las biografías de los santos. Pero Sauer había optado por un método de trabajo que algunos de sus sucesores consideraron reprochable y que, en la actualidad, sería cien- tíficamente injustificable. Para hacer más atractivos tanto la narración como el propio contenido de cada una de las biografías, no dudó en reescribir los textos originales, obviando todos aquellos pasajes que pudiesen resultar ridículos o poco edificantes. Ya contemporáneas a la obra de Rosweyde, es necesario mencionar otras dos importantes iniciativas en materia hagiográfica: la primera, la de los cartujos de Colonia que determinaron publicar los textos originales adulterados en su día por Sauer; la segunda, la de Antonio Gallonio (1556-1605), secretario y luego hagiógrafo de Felipe Neri. Sin embargo, Rosweyde se propuso algo bastante más ambicioso que todos ellos. Los cartujos solo trataban de paliar las deficiencias de Sauer y Gallonio no se planteó publicar las fuentes en sí mismas, sino que las utilizaba como meros documentos de consulta. Cuando en 1603 presentó su proyecto a los superiores de la Compañía, estos lo aplaudieron y le animaron a continuar con él, pero no le relevaron de ninguna de sus obligaciones, por lo que el avance de las investigaciones se detuvo de forma temporal. Aún así, fue capaz de entregar a la afa- mada imprenta de Christophe Plantin (Amberes), en 1607, sus “Fasti Sanctorum quorum Vitae in Belgicis bibliothecis manuscriptae asservatur”. Se trataba de un breve libro que, sin llegar al cen- tenar de páginas, exponía, entre otras cosas, el plan de lo que iba a ser su magna opera hagiográfi- ca, en la que, con exhaustividad, trataría de recoger las biografías de los santos, con independencia de su época, sexo y nación. El actual director de la Sociedad de los Bolandistas, Robert Godding, resume el método de trabajo que el propio Rosweyde expuso en los “Fasti Sanctorum...”: Los textos deben ser publicados de forma íntegra, sin supresiones, retoques o correcciones estilísticas (un defecto que caracterizó la obra de Surius); deben también acompañarse de anotaciones que aclaren los pasajes oscuros, resuelvan las contradicciones aparentes y proporcionen todas las explicaciones necesarias para mejorar la comprensión3. 1 R. GODDING, “L´oeuvre hagiographique d´Héribert Rosweyde”, en R. GODDING, B. JOASSART y X. LEQUEUX (eds.), De Rosweyde aux Acta Sanctorum: La recherche hagiographique des Bollandistes à travers quatre siècles: Actes du Colloque international (Bruxelles, 5 octobre 2007), Bruxelles, 2009, p. 35-36. 2 El trabajo de Laurenz Sauer (o Laurentius Surius) gozó de gran popularidad y disfrutó de una no menos importante vigencia. La segunda edición de “De probatis sanctorum historiis” apareció en Colonia, entre 1576 y 1581; la tercera, en Venecia en 1581 (“De vitis sanctorum”); la cuarta, de nuevo en Colonia, en 1618 (“Vitae Sanctorum ex probatis authoribus et mss. Codicibus”); y, finalmente, entre 1875 y 1880, aparecieron los 13 volúmenes de una edición revisada y ampliada en Turín. 3 R. GODDING, “L´oeuvre hagiographique d´Héribert Rosweyde”, en R. GODDING, B. JOASSART y X. 76 DOCUMENTA & INSTRUMENTA, 9 (2011), PP. 75-97 BÁRBARA SANTIAGO MEDINA ¿HEREJÍA O DIFAMACIÓN?: LOS BOLANDISTAS ANTE EL SANTO OFICIO (1691-1715) En lo que respecta a su trabajo con las fuentes manuscritas, resultaba imprescindible poder localizarlas e investigarlas de forma sistemática. Para ello, Rosweyde no pensaba circunscribirse a las bibliotecas belgas (como indicaba el título de los “Fasti Sanctorum...”), sino que esperaba tener acceso a numerosas copias enviadas por su red de corresponsales en el extranjero. El esquema de la futura obra comprende dieciocho volúmenes. Los tres primeros, dedicados a las festividades de Cristo, la Virgen y las principales solemnidades litúrgicas. Los doce siguien- tes, consagrados cada uno a un mes del año, situando cada biografía en el día de su celebración. El volumen XVI editaría los antiguos martirologios4. Pero, además, Rosweyde pensó añadir otros dos: uno que hiciese accesibles al lector diversos elementos necesarios para la buena comprensión de los textos (iconografía, cronología, topografía...); y otro con un índice que facilitase el acceso al resto de volúmenes. Los “Fasti Sanctorum...” tuvieron una acogida dispar. La mayor parte de los eruditos euro- peos alabaron y apoyaron el proyecto, pero no faltaron voces críticas que veían en la futura obra de Rosweyde un ataque a la memoria de Sauer y, por extensión, una ofensa contra la Cartuja. Otra objeción habitual, esta vez de carácter práctico, era la que ponía de manifiesto la dificultad de en- contrar un impresor que se arriesgara a aceptar un encargo de semejante envergadura5. El cardenal italiano Roberto Bellarmino (1542-1621) indicó, sabiamente, que la magnitud de la publicación requeriría el trabajo de toda una vida, pero no solo de un hombre, sino de varios. Héribert Rosweyde no pudo ver materializada su obra. Los superiores de la Compañía per- dieron interés en un propósito del cual no se obtendrían unos beneficios claros, tangibles y a corto plazo. Y ello sin tener en cuenta que, incluso, podía fracasar. En los años siguientes a la publica- ción de los “Fasti Sanctorum...”, Rosweyde fue encomendado a obras de carácter menor, pero en las que pudo poner en práctica el método filológico que ya había planteado. Continuó defendiendo la viabilidad de su proyecto hasta su muerte, acaecida en Amberes, el 5 de octubre de 1629. 2. LAS “ACTA SANCTORUM” En 1630 es enviado a la casa profesa de los jesuitas de Amberes el padre Jean Bolland (1596- 1665). Los superiores de la Compañía deseaban que alguien retomase el trabajo que Rosweyde dejara inconcluso y Bolland, por su formación teológica y humanista, parecía idóneo para la con- secución de tal objetivo. La decisión resultó acertada, pues, en 1643, aparecieron los dos tomos del volumen dedicado al mes de enero de las “Acta Sanctorum”, impresos por Jan van Meurs en Amberes. Como puede suponerse, una obra de semejantes características es difícilmente asumi- ble por una sola persona. Por ello, en 1635, se incorporó a ella, como colaborador de Bolland, Godfrey Henschen (1601-1681) y, en 1659, lo hizo Daniel Papebroch (1628-1714).
Recommended publications
  • Sanctity and Discernment of Spirits in the Early Modern Period
    Angels of Light? Studies in Medieval and Reformation Traditions Edited by Andrew Colin Gow Edmonton, Alberta In cooperation with Sylvia Brown, Edmonton, Alberta Falk Eisermann, Berlin Berndt Hamm, Erlangen Johannes Heil, Heidelberg Susan C. Karant-Nunn, Tucson, Arizona Martin Kaufhold, Augsburg Erik Kwakkel, Leiden Jürgen Miethke, Heidelberg Christopher Ocker, San Anselmo and Berkeley, California Founding Editor Heiko A. Oberman † VOLUME 164 The titles published in this series are listed at brill.com/smrt Angels of Light? Sanctity and the Discernment of Spirits in the Early Modern Period Edited by Clare Copeland Jan Machielsen LEIDEN • BOSTON 2013 Cover illustration: “Diaboli sub figura 2 Monialium fraudulentis Sermonibus, conantur illam divertere ab incepto vivendi modo,” in Vita ser. virg. S. Maria Magdalenae de Pazzis, Florentinae ordinis B.V.M. de Monte Carmelo iconibus expressa, Abraham van Diepenbeke (Antwerp, ca. 1670). Reproduced with permission from the Bibliotheca Carmelitana, Rome. Library of Congress Control Number: 2012952309 This publication has been typeset in the multilingual “Brill” typeface. With over 5,100 characters covering Latin, IPA, Greek, and Cyrillic, this typeface is especially suitable for use in the humanities. For more information, please see www.brill.com/brill-typeface. ISSN 1573-4188 ISBN 978-90-04-23369-0 (hardback) ISBN 978-90-04-23370-6 (e-book) Copyright 2013 by Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands. Koninklijke Brill NV incorporates the imprints Brill, Global Oriental, Hotei Publishing, IDC Publishers and Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, translated, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior written permission from the publisher.
    [Show full text]
  • Jubeljahre Und Freudenfeiern. Studien Zum Katholischen Jubiläum in Der Frühen Neuzeit
    Jubeljahre und Freudenfeiern. Studien zum katholischen Jubiläum in der Frühen Neuzeit Dissertation zur Erlangung des Grades eines Doktors der Philosophie an der Philosophischen Fakultät der Technischen Universität Dresden vorgelegt von Astrid Schwerhoff Verteidigung am 28.10.2020. Betreuer: Prof. Dr. Winfried Müller, TU Dresden Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Winfried Müller, Dresden Prof. Dr. Hannelore Putz, Passau/ München Inhalt I. Einleitung ................................................................................................................................ 6 II. Traditionsstränge und Entwicklungslinien .......................................................................... 15 1. Das Heilige Jahr und die katholischen Jubiläen ............................................................... 16 1.1 Entstehung und Entwicklung des Heiligen Jahres ..................................................... 16 1.2 Außerordentliche Jubiläen .......................................................................................... 24 1.3 Personale Jubiläen ...................................................................................................... 32 2. Protestantische Jubiläumskultur ....................................................................................... 33 2.1 Universitätsjubiläen .................................................................................................... 34 2.2 Reformationsjubiläen ................................................................................................. 37 3. Antike
    [Show full text]
  • The Jesuits a Short List
    THE JESUITS A SHORT LIST BERNARD QUARITCH LTD LIST 2017/4 1. ALEMBERT, Jean Lerond d’. An account of the destruction of the Jesuits in France. London, printed for T. Becket and P.A. de Hondt, 1766. 12mo, pp. viii, 232; a little occasional light foxing, but a very good copy in contemporary calf, gilt red morocco lettering-piece to spine; extremities a little worn; bookplate of Charles Stirling. £200 First edition of the first English translation of this controversial text by d’Alembert, the great French mathematician, scientist, philosopher and editor of the Encyclopédie. Following the expulsion of the Jesuits from France in 1764, d’Alembert’s Sur la destruction des Jésuites appeared anonymously in Geneva, on the advice of Voltaire, in 1765. In it he tried to show that the Society, in spite of its scholarly and educational achievements, had destroyed itself through its excessive desire for power. ESTC T86359. 2. [ANON.] Lettera ad un amico che contiene come una risposta generale a tutte le ragioni, che in sostanza furono addotte nella stampa d’un certo libro con la data di Fossombrone, che ha per titolo Lettere dell’ Abate N. N. Milanese ad un prelato Romano, apologetiche della Compagnia di Gesù contra due libelli intitolati Riflessioni sopra il memoriale presentato da PP. Gesuiti alla santità di Papa Clemente XIII ... e appendice alle riflessioni. Lugano, nella stamperia privilegiata della suprema superiorità Elvetica nelle prefetture Italiane [i.e. Venice, Giuseppe Bettinelli], 1761. 8vo, pp. 116, [4 (errata and final blank leaf)]; title within border of type ornaments; some light foxing, a very good uncut copy in contemporary plain wrappers, title inked to spine; a few marks.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    Introduction Samantha Kahn Herrick Every medieval saint’s cult required a set of narratives, for every saint was de- fined by the story that revealed his or her sanctity. Such narratives were often transmitted as Latin texts, although they could be written in the vernacular or composed and preserved orally— and indeed many stories about saints cir- culated in some combination of these forms. Those still accessible to scholars are primarily the written works on which this book focuses. The fundamental text related the saint’s story as his or her devotees wished to tell it— his or her life (vita), if the saint died peacefully, or passion (passio), if he or she was martyred. Miracle collections recorded and publicized the wonders that were said to have occurred at the saint’s tomb (and elsewhere). Inventions (inven- tiones) reported the discovery of relics; translations (translationes) their ritual transfer and installation— these are the most common of the many different sorts of texts produced in the Latin Middle Ages, in their thousands, to pro- mote and celebrate the sanctity and wondrous deeds of myriad holy women and men. These are the sorts of documents most often meant by the term hagiography. The modern study of such texts owes much to the work of pre- modern scholars. Protestant reformers such as Martin Luther criticized Catholic vener- ation of saints. Among other things, they alleged that the stories told about in- dividual saints were often untrue.1 In response to such charges, the Jesuit Jean Bolland (d. 1665) began the critical examination of saints honored in the Ro- man calendar.2 He aimed to weed both baseless narratives and dubious cults by means of the latest analytical tools.
    [Show full text]
  • The Theater of Piety: Sacred Operas for the Barberini Family In
    The Theater of Piety: Sacred Operas for the Barberini Family (Rome, 1632-1643) Virginia Christy Lamothe A dissertation submitted to the faculty of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Music. Chapel Hill 2009 Approved by: Tim Carter, chair Annegret Fauser Anne MacNeil John Nádas Jocelyn Neal © 2009 Virginia Christy Lamothe ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii Abstract Virginia Christy Lamothe: “The Theater of Piety: Sacred Operas for the Barberini Family (Rome, 1632-1643)” (Under the direction of Tim Carter) In a time of religious war, plague, and reformation, Pope Urban VIII and his cardinal- nephews Antonio and Francesco Barberini sought to establish the authority of the Catholic Church by inspiring audiences of Rome with visions of the heroic deeds of saints. One way in which they did this was by commissioning operas based on the lives of saints from the poet Giulio Rospigliosi (later Pope Clement IX), and papal musicians Stefano Landi and Virgilio Mazzocchi. Aside from the merit of providing an in-depth look at four of these little-known works, Sant’Alessio (1632, 1634), Santi Didimo e Teodora (1635), San Bonifatio (1638), and Sant’Eustachio (1643), this dissertation also discusses how these operas reveal changing ideas of faith, civic pride, death and salvation, education, and the role of women during the first half of the seventeenth century. The analysis of the music and the drama stems from studies of the surviving manuscript scores, libretti, payment records and letters about the first performances.
    [Show full text]
  • Authenticating Relics in Seventeenth-Century Spain Katrina B
    The University of San Francisco USF Scholarship: a digital repository @ Gleeson Library | Geschke Center History College of Arts and Sciences 2012 The Ambiguities of the Holy: Authenticating Relics in Seventeenth-Century Spain Katrina B. Olds University of San Francisco, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://repository.usfca.edu/hist Part of the European History Commons, and the History of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Olds, Katrina. 2012. "The Ambiguities of the Holy: Authenticating Relics in Seventeenth-Century Spain." Renaissance Quarterly 65, no. 1: 135-184. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Arts and Sciences at USF Scholarship: a digital repository @ Gleeson Library | Geschke Center. It has been accepted for inclusion in History by an authorized administrator of USF Scholarship: a digital repository @ Gleeson Library | Geschke Center. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Ambiguities of the Holy: Authenticating Relics in Seventeenth-Century Spain* by K ATRINA O LDS Recent scholarship has shown that, even at the heart of the Catholic world, defining holiness in the Counter-Reformation was remarkably difficult, in spite of ongoing Roman reforms meant to centralize and standardize the authentication of saints and relics. If the standards for evaluating sanctity were complex and contested in Rome, they were even less clear to regional actors, such as the Bishop of Jae´n, who supervised the discovery of relics in Arjona, a southern Spanish town, beginning in 1628. The new relics presented the bishop, Cardinal Baltasar de Moscoso y Sandoval, with knotty historical, theological, and procedural dilemmas.
    [Show full text]
  • This Document Does Not Meet the Current Format Guidelines of The
    DISCLAIMER: This document does not meet current format guidelines Graduate School at the The University of Texas at Austin. of the It has been published for informational use only. Copyright by Manuel F. Salas Fernández 2016 The Dissertation Committee for Manuel F. Salas Fernández certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: ALBERTO HURTADO: A BIOGRAPHICAL STUDY OF HIS JESUIT TRAINING, 1923-1936 Committee: Matthew Butler, Supervisor Virginia Garrard-Burnett, Co-Supervisor Ann Twinam Seth W. Garfield Ricardo Cubas-R. <Member's Name> ALBERTO HURTADO: A BIOGRAPHICAL STUDY OF HIS JESUIT TRAINING, 1923-1936 by Manuel F. Salas-Fernández, B.A.; M.A. Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Texas at Austin August, 2016 A mis padres, A mi señora, A mis hijos Acknowledgements This work which is now in the hands of the reader is the culmination of a process that began officially in July 2009, when I was awarded a Fulbright-Mecesup2 grant to pursue my doctoral studies in the United States of America. This would not have been possible without the help of my dissertation supervisor, Dr. Matthew Butler, who provided his careful scrutiny of my writing and his wise advice. I am also grateful to Dr. Virginia Burnett, for her dedication and guidance during the years devoted to my studies. To the other members of the dissertation committee, learned professors who enriched my passage through the University of Texas at Austin program, and showed me, incidentally, that the indices that rate it as the number one program in the field of Latin America in the United States, do not provide a sufficiently broad dimension of the intellectual and human wealth that it entails.
    [Show full text]
  • Thomas Head Hunter College and the Graduate Center, CUNY
    A Guide to the Sources of Late Antique and Medieval Hagiography Compiled by Thomas Head Hunter College and the Graduate Center, CUNY Contents: 1) The primary sources ; 2) Guides to the saints ; 3) Guides to hagiographic literature ; 4) Guides to iconography ; 5) General works in hagiographic scholarship ; 6) Some useful catalogues of manuscripts . 1. The primary sources. 1/1. Some major collections of hagiographic sources. Sanctuarium seu Vitae sanctorum , ed. Boninus Mombritius (Bonino Mombrizio), 2 vols. (Milan, ca. 1477; reprint edition, Paris, 1910). De probatis sanctorum historiis ed. Laurentius Surius (Laurence Suhr), 6 vols. and index (first edition, Cologne, 1570-75; second edition, 1576-1581; third edition, Venice, 1581). Fourth editon: De probatis sanctorum vitis , 12 volumes (Cologne, 1618). Fifth edition: Historiae seu Vitae sanctorum . , 13 vols. (Marieta, 1875-1880). (Organized by liturgical calendar.) Acta primorum martyrym sincera et selecta . , ed. Th. Ruinart (Paris, 1689). Second edition: Antwerp, 1713. Third edition: Verona, 1731. Fourth edition: Augsburg, 1802-3. Fifth edition: Regensburg, 1859. Acta Sanctorum quotquot toto orbe coluntur , eds. Jean Bolland, et al, (original ed., 67 vols., Antwerp and Brussels, 1643-1940; second edition, 43 vols., Venice; third edition, 60 vols., Paris). (Organized by liturgical calendar.) Standard abbreviation: AASS. Acta Sanctorum ordinis Sancti Benedicti , eds. Luc d'Achéry and Jean Mabillon, first ed., 6 vols. in 9 (Paris, 1668-1701; partial reprint edition, Brussels, 1935). (Organized by century of the "Order of St. Benedict": the first volume covers the sixth century, the sixth volume the eleventh.) Standard abbeviation: AASSOB. 1/2. Other standard collections of medieval sources which include hagiographic material.
    [Show full text]
  • S0022046912003181.Pdf
    JOURNAL OF ECCLESIASTICAL HISTORY ‘contemplative/mystical experience’ are nonsensical, as all language is self- reflexive, and all experience is interpretation. Such texts would be better identified as devotional, abstract, didactic or anagogical. Another common error is that affective technically refers to motivation, not to experience. In his reading of Ambrose and his sources, Schwanda uses the existential anachronisms of the Cartesian subject. It is folly to apply a methodology that allows for only one epistemology (linear self-consciousness) to texts that assume two epistemologies (the second being the larger, more rational and objective deep mind, which is out of sight but not influence). It is folly to apply a methodology that looks for closure to texts that lead the reader into infinite openness. The author wrongly equates so-called spiritual direction, which grew out of the Counter-Reformation, with pre- Reformation practices of consulting the elders or having a confessor. He even attempts to put Ambrose on the procrustean grid of a modern system for categorising ‘experience’ called ‘the spiritual movement matrix’. To sum up, it is quite possible that Ambrose in his time stood outside the solipsistic experiential extravaganza that characterises much of today’s studies of religious people and their texts, but he needs to be examined through a more independent, sympathetic and epistemologically accurate lens. OXFORD MAGGIE ROSS Aspects de l’érudition hagiographique aux XVIIe et XVIIIe siècles. By Bernard Joassart. (École Pratique de Hautes Études. Sciences Historiques et Philologiques, . Hautes Etudes médiévales et modernes, .) Pp. ix+ incl. figs. Geneva: Librairie Droz, . E. (paper). p; JEH () ; doi:./S This is a welcome book.
    [Show full text]
  • Losing Origen and Gaining Retributive Judgment in the Hagiographical Literature of the Early Byzantine World Todd
    Just Deserts: Losing Origen and Gaining Retributive Judgment in the Hagiographical Literature of the Early Byzantine World Todd Edison French Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2014 © 2013 Todd Edison French All rights reserved ABSTRACT Just Deserts: Losing Origen and Gaining Retributive Judgment in the Hagiographical Literature of the Early Byzantine World Todd Edison French The rise in production and distribution of Christian Hagiography in the Early Byzantine Empire points towards a unique moment in Christian History. The role of the saint was moved from the margins to a central and dynamic position within the church hierarchy and broader religious landscape. Meeting the pagan claims of power and prestige, hagiographers crafted a saint that was more retributive than the earlier martyrologies and histories. The ascetic took on a role that was more akin to God’s agent than suffering stranger. The deserts of Syria, Palestine and Egypt become the territory of struggle against a world that had fallen out of step with God’s will, but was slowly being corrected. This research looks for reasons as to why this prominent form of literature became more deliberately retributive through its progression toward the sixth century. A major focus of the argument will be the influence that Origen had on Christian theological interpretation. Beginning with a section on Origen, this research will move on through the five most prominent hagiographical compilations in late antiquity. In the end, it will show that each of these hagiographers’ relationship with Origen’s teaching and subsequent communities yielded a particular flavor of hagiography on a spectrum of retributive justice.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring the Distinctiveness of Neo-Latin Jesuit Didactic Poetry in Naples: the Case of Nicolò Partenio Giannettasio 24 Claudia Schindler
    Exploring Jesuit Distinctiveness <UN> Jesuit Studies Modernity through the Prism of Jesuit History VOLUME 6 The Boston College International Symposia on Jesuit Studies VOLUME 1 Edited by Robert Aleksander Maryks (Boston College) Editorial Board James Bernauer, S.J. (Boston College) Louis Caruana, S.J. (Pontif icia Università Gregoriana, Rome) Emanuele Colombo (DePaul University) Paul Grendler (University of Toronto, emeritus) Yasmin Haskell (University of Western Australia) Ronnie Po-chia Hsia (Pennsylvania State University) Thomas M. McCoog, S.J. (Fordham University) Mia Mochizuki (New York University Abu Dhabi and Institute of Fine Arts, New York) Sabina Pavone (Università degli Studi di Macerata) Moshe Sluhovsky (The Hebrew University of Jerusalem) Jeffrey Chipps Smith (The University of Texas at Austin) The titles published in this series are listed at brill.com/js <UN> Exploring Jesuit Distinctiveness Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Ways of Proceeding within the Society of Jesus Edited by Robert Aleksander Maryks Published for the Institute for Advanced Jesuit Studies at Boston College LEIDEN | BOSTON <UN> This is an open access title distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-NonDerivative 3.0 Unported (cc-by-nc-nd 3.0) License, which permits any noncommercial use, and distribution, provided no alterations are made and the original author(s) and source are credited. Cover illustration: “Iuvenes ex Academia Parisiensi novem eligit, ac socios consilii sui detinat” ([Ignatius] chooses nine young men from the University of Paris and makes them companions of his project). Vita Beati P. Ignatii Loiolae Societatis Iesu fundatoris (Rome, 1609), plate 39. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: Maryks, Robert A., editor.
    [Show full text]
  • Saint George 1 Saint George
    Saint George 1 Saint George "St George" redirects here. For other uses, see Saint George (disambiguation). Saint George of Lydda Saint George, 1472, by Carlo Crivelli Martyr Born 280 AD Lydda, Syria Palaestina, Roman Empire Died 23 April 303 Nicomedia, Bithynia, Roman Empire Honored in Catholic Church Anglicanism Lutheranism Oriental Orthodox Church Eastern Orthodox Church Major Church of Saint George, Lod, Israel shrine Feast 23 April/6 May (Saint George's Day) Attributes Clothed as a soldier in a suit of armour or chain mail, often bearing a lance tipped by a cross, riding a white horse, often slaying a dragon. In the West he is shown with St George's Cross emblazoned on his armour, or shield or banner. Patronage Many Patronages of Saint George exist around the world Saint George (Greek: Γεώργιος Georgios; Classical Syriac: ܣܝܓܪܘܝܓ Giwargis; Latin: Georgius; c. 275/281 – 23 April 303 AD), born in Lydda, Roman Palestine, was a soldier in the Roman army and was later venerated as a Christian martyr. His father was Gerontius, a Greek Christian from Cappadocia, and an official in the Roman army. His mother, Polychronia was a Christian from Roman Palestine. Saint George became an officer in the Roman army in the Guard of Diocletian. In hagiography, Saint George is one of the most venerated saints in the Catholic (Western and Eastern Rites), Anglican, Eastern Orthodox, and the Oriental Orthodox churches. He is immortalized in the tale of Saint George and the Dragon and is one of the Fourteen Holy Helpers. His memorial is celebrated on 23 April (6 May), and he is regarded as one of the most prominent military saints.
    [Show full text]