DOCSLIB.ORG

Tbilisi Disaster Needs Assessment 2015

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Tbilisi Disaster Needs Assessment 2015 TBILISI DISASTER NEEDS ASSESSMENT 2015 FINAL DRAFT 2 September, 2015 Contents Foreword .......................................................................................................................................................................... 5 Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................................................... 6 SECTION I: THE DISASTER ........................................................................................................................................8 Description of the disaster ........................................................................................................................................8 Hydrology of the Vere River ......................................................................................................................................8 Summary of the causes of the disaster ...................................................................................................................9 Response to the disaster............................................................................................................................................9 SECTION II: ESTIMATION OF DISASTER EFFECTS ..........................................................................................12 Effects upon the population .....................................................................................................................................12 DESCRIPTION AND VALUATION OF DAMAGES AND LOSSES ...............................................................12 Sector 1: Housing .................................................................................................................................................12 Sector 2: Transport ...............................................................................................................................................13 Sector 3: The Zoo .................................................................................................................................................19 Sector 4: Water management & drainage basin and river management ...................................................22 The private sector ................................................................................................................................................23 SECTION III: SECTORAL NEEDS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR RECOVERY ...................................24 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................24 Housing ........................................................................................................................................................................24 1. Immediate measures ........................................................................................................................................25 2. Short-term measures.......................................................................................................................................27 3. Medium and long-term measures .................................................................................................................27 Transportation ............................................................................................................................................................27 Debris flow hazard measures ............................................................................................................................28 The Amirejibi Highway ........................................................................................................................................29 Landslides ...............................................................................................................................................................29 Areas of cut slope failures ..................................................................................................................................29 Transport: recommended measures by time frame ...........................................................................................30 1. Immediate measures ........................................................................................................................................30 2. Short-term measures .......................................................................................................................................31 3. Medium to long-term measures ....................................................................................................................31 Water management: Managing the river and its drainage basin .......................................................................31 1. Immediate measures ........................................................................................................................................32 2. Short to medium-term actions (12 to 36 Months) ...................................................................................36 3. Medium to long term (> 36 Months) ...........................................................................................................37 Tbilisi Zoo ....................................................................................................................................................................40 1. Immediate measures ........................................................................................................................................40 2. Short-term measures .......................................................................................................................................41 3. Medium and long-term measures..................................................................................................................41 SECTION IV: RECOMMENDATIONS FOR IMPROVING DISASTER RISK MANAGEMENT ..................42 Description of institutional mechanisms and capacities for disaster risk reduction (DRR)......................42 Tbilisi’s hazard, risk and vulnerability profiles ......................................................................................................43 Weather monitoring and forecasting systems .....................................................................................................44 The environmental impact of the 13 June floods ................................................................................................46 Assessing the performance of the DRR system at the municipal level ..........................................................46 1. Understanding disaster risk ............................................................................................................................47 2. Disaster risk governance to manage disaster risk .....................................................................................47 3. Investing in disaster risk reduction for resilience ......................................................................................48 4. Disaster preparedness for effective response and for “Build Back Better” during recovery, rehabilitation and reconstruction .......................................................................................48 SECTION V: Recommendations FOR STRENGTHENING TBILISI’S DISASTER RISK REDUCTION system towards A RISK-INFORMED DEVELOPMENT ......................................50 Short-term recommendations: ...........................................................................................................................50 Medium-term recommendations: ......................................................................................................................51 Long-term recommendations: ............................................................................................................................52 ANNEXES .......................................................................................................................................................................................53 ANNEX 6: List of institutions interviewed for assessment of DRR Sector .................................................53 ANNEX 7: Tbilisi Disaster Profile ...........................................................................................................................53 TABLES ........................................................................................................................................................................55 FIGURES ........................................................................................................................................................................56 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ......................................................................................................................57 REFERENCES..................................................................................................................................................................58 TBILISI DISASTER NEEDS ASSESSMENT 2015 Foreword During the night of 13-14 June 2015, heavy rainfall over the Vere River basin resulted in sudden, destruc- tive flash floods which struck the Vake and Saburtalo neighbourhoods of Georgia’s capital, Tbilisi, as well as other areas of the city along the right bank of the river Mtkvari. The Lisi, Tsodoreti,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Climate Change and Security in the South Caucasus
    CLIMATE CHANGE AND SECURITY IN THE SOUTH CAUCASUS REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA, REPUBLIC OF AZERBAIJAN AND GEORGIA Regional Assessment ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS PROJECT CO-ORDINATION Within the framework of the project Climate Change and Security in Eastern Europe, Central Asia and the Southern Caucasus under the Christine Kitzler, Dana Bogdan (OSCE) Environment and Security Initiative (ENVSEC), one of the four main activities aimed at identifying and mapping climate change and security risks in Eastern Europe, Central Asia and the South Caucasus in a participatory way, the conclusions of which are presented in the current report for the South Caucasus. ASSESSMENT CO-ORDINATION Harald Egerer, Pier Carlo Sandei, Filippo Montalbetti (UN Environment), Valentin Yemelin (GRID-Arendal) The Austrian Development Agency (ADA) has co-funded the project by providing financial resources for the project activities in the pilot region in the Dniester River Basin. Moreover, the ENVSEC initiative partners the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE), the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), UN Environment, the United Nations Economic Commission for LEAD AUTHOR Europe (UNECE) and the Regional Environmental Centre for Central and Eastern Europe (REC) contributed their own resources to the Ieva Rucevska (GRID-Arendal) implementation of this project. CONTRIBUTORS AND REVIEWERS Nino Malashkhia (OSCE) Trine Kirkfeldt, Hanne Jørstad, Valentin Yemelin (GRID-Arnedal) Mahir Aliyev (UN Environment) Zsolt Lengyel (Climate East Policy) The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the ENVSEC partner organizations, their donors or the participating States. Participants in the national consultations that took place in the Republic of Armenia (Yerevan, 12 May 2014), the Republic of Azerbaijan (Baku, 30 May 2014) and in Georgia (Tbilisi, 8 May 2014) commented and contributed to the regional assessment.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient Glaciation of the Caucasus
    Open Journal of Geology, 2018, 8, 56-64 http://www.scirp.org/journal/ojg ISSN Online: 2161-7589 ISSN Print: 2161-7570 Ancient Glaciation of the Caucasus Khazaradze Revaz, Kharadze Koba, Tsikarishvili Kukuri, Chartolani Giorgi Vakhushti Bagrationi Institute of Geography, Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University, Tbilisi, Georgia How to cite this paper: Revaz, K., Koba, Abstract K., Kukuri, T. and Giorgi, C. (2018) An- cient Glaciation of the Caucasus. Open The paper deals with important, different views on the old glaciation of the Journal of Geology, 8, 56-64. Caucasus based on the literary sources and the latest data obtained through https://doi.org/10.4236/ojg.2018.81004 the expeditions. Our researches are mostly of complex character where petro- Received: December 8, 2017 graphic, palynological and paleontological methods are widely used. The pe- Accepted: January 20, 2018 trographic method allowed us to connect block debris of the moraine with the Published: January 23, 2018 main centers and to determine the directions of the glaciers movement and Copyright © 2018 by authors and their distribution boundaries. The palynological method was used to deter- Scientific Research Publishing Inc. mine the genesis of loose sediments considered as moraines and their sedi- This work is licensed under the Creative mentation conditions. The palynological spectrum of deposits shows that they Commons Attribution International License (CC BY 4.0). are river sediments and their sedimentation took place under humid, mod- http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ erately warm climate conditions that is not associated with glaciation. Open Access Keywords Petrography, Palynology, Genesis, Sedimentation 1. Introduction The study of the Caucasian Isthmus, from the point of view of paleoglaciation, began in the second part of the XIX century [1].
    [Show full text]
  • Reserved Domains
    Countries: (.ge; .edu.ge; .org.ge; .net.ge; .pvt.ge; .school.ge) afghanistan cameroon ghana lebanon nigeria spain zambia albania canada greece lesotho norway srilanka zimbabwe algeria centralafricanrepublic grenada liberia oman sudan andorra chad guatemala libya pakistan suriname angola chile guinea liechtenstein palau swaziland antiguaandbarbuda china guinea-bissau lithuania palestina sweden argentina colombia guyana luxembourg panama switzerland armenia comoros haiti macau papuanewguinea syria aruba congo honduras macedonia paraguay taiwan australia costarica hongkong madagascar peru tajikistan austria croatia hungary malawi philippines tanzania azerbaijan cuba iceland malaysia poland thailand bahama curacao india maldives portugal timor-leste bahrain cyprus indonesia mali qatar togo bangladesh czechia iran malta romania tonga barbados denmark iraq marshallislands russia trinidadandtobago belarus djibouti ireland mauritania rwanda tunisia belgium dominica israel mauritius saintlucia turkey belize dominicanrepublic italy mexico samoa turkmenistan benin ecuador jamaica micronesia sanmarino tuvalu bhutan egypt japan moldova saudiarabia uganda birma elsalvador jordan monaco senegal ukraine bolivia equatorialguinea kazakhstan mongolia serbia unitedarabemirates bosniaandherzegovina eritrea kenya montenegro seychelles uk botswana estonia kiribati morocco sierraleone england brazil ethiopia northkorea mozambique singapore unitedkingdom brunei fiji korea namibia sintmaarten uruguay bulgaria finland southkorea nauru slovakia uzbekistan burkinafaso
    [Show full text]
  • Georgia (Country)
    Georgia (country) This article is about the country. For the U.S. state, brief Russo-Georgian War in August 2008. see Georgia (U.S. state). For other uses, see Georgia Georgia is a member of the United Nations, the Council (disambiguation). of Europe, and the GUAM Organization for Democracy and Economic Development. It contains two de facto in- Coordinates: 42°00′N 43°30′E / 42.000°N 43.500°E dependent regions, Abkhazia and South Ossetia, which Georgia ( i/ˈdʒɔːrdʒə/; Georgian: საქართველო, tr. gained limited international recognition after the 2008 Russo-Georgian War. Georgia and a major part of the Sakartvelo, IPA: [sɑkʰɑrtʰvɛlɔ]) is a country in the Caucasus region of Eurasia. Located at the crossroads international community consider the regions to be part of Georgia’s sovereign territory under Russian military of Western Asia and Eastern Europe, it is bounded to [7] the west by the Black Sea, to the north by Russia, to the occupation. south by Turkey and Armenia, and to the southeast by Azerbaijan. The capital and largest city is Tbilisi. Geor- gia covers a territory of 69,700 square kilometres (26,911 1 Etymology sq mi), and its 2016 population is about 3.72 million. Georgia is a unitary, semi-presidential republic, with the Main article: Name of Georgia (country) government elected through a representative democracy. “Georgia” probably stems from the Persian designation During the classical era, several independent kingdoms became established in what is now Georgia. The king- doms of Colchis and Iberia adopted Christianity in the early 4th century. A unified Kingdom of Georgia reached the peak of its political and economic strength during the reign of King David IV and Queen Tamar in the 12th and early 13th centuries.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Environmental Assessment(Sea)
    STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (SEA) OF THE WASTE MANAGEMENT ACTION PLAN OF GEORGIA REPORT JANUARY 2016 The SEA report draws upon the information contained in the National Waste Management Action Plan as of October 2015 The SEA report draws upon the information contained in the National Waste Management Action Plan as of October 2015. The report was prepared by the national SEA Pilot Project Team experts: Ms. Elena Bakradze, Ms. Tamar Kvantaliani, Ms. Nia Giuashvili, Mr. Goergi Gaphrindashvili, Mr. Georgi Natroshvili, and Mr. Irakli Kaviladze and the SEA Pilot Project Team Leader - Ms. Irma Melikishvili – under supervision of the UNECE international experts: Dr. Maia Gachechiladze-Bozhesku and Mr. Michal Musil. This report was produced with the technical assistance of the UNECE within the EaP GREEN Programme financed by the European Commission. The views expressed herein can in no way be taken to reflect the official opinion of the UNECE and its Partner organizations or the European Union. Organization responsible for the report: United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE) Convention on Environmental Impact Assessment in a Transboundary Context Palais des Nations CH-1211 Geneva 10 Switzerland Tel: +41 22 917 1723 Email: [email protected] 2 Contents 1. Background Information 5 1.1 Project Information ............................................................................................................................... 5 1.2 SEA Process ......................................................................................................................................... 5 2. Nature of this report 7 3. The content and the main objectives of the National Waste Management Action Plan and its link with other plans or programmes 9 4. The relevant aspects of the current state of the environment, including health 14 4.1 Surface and ground waters ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • National Disaster Risk Reduction Strategy of Georgia 2017-2020
    APPENDIX №1 National Disaster Risk Reduction Strategy of Georgia 2017-2020 2017 Tbilisi, Georgia Content 1.Introduction............................................................................................................................................ 4 1.1. Goal of the Strategy................................................................................................................................ 4 2. Assessment of Current Situation ............................................................................................................... 5 2.1. Legislation on Disaster Management ......................................................................................................... 5 2.1.1. The Law of Georgia on the “Structure, Authority and Rules of Operation of the Government of Georgia” ............................................................................................................................................ 5 2.1.2. The Law of Georgia on the “National Security Policy Planning and Coordination” ........................ 5 2.1.3. The Law of Georgia on “Public Safety” ............................................................................................. 6 2.1.4. The Law of Georgia on “State of Emergency” ...................................................................................... 6 2.2. The EU-Georgia Association Agreement ................................................................................................... 6 2.3. Disaster Risk Reduction Global Political Framework ...............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Ecological Problems of Rivers of Georgia (The&Nbsp
    annals of agrarian science xxx (2016) 1e6 Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect journal homepage: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/annals-of- agrarian-science The ecological problems of rivers of Georgia (the Caspian Sea basin) Zurab Lomsadze*, Ketevan Makharadze, Rusudan Pirtskhalava The Technical University of Georgia, The Center for Studying Productive Forces and Natural Resources of Georgia, 69, M. Kostava str., Tbilisi, 0175, Georgia article info abstract Article history: The increasing demands of fresh water in the world threaten the biodiversity and the Received 29 April 2016 supply of water for food production and other vital human needs. Providing adequate Accepted 7 July 2016 quantities of pure, fresh water for humans and their diverse activities is the major problem Available online xxx worldwide. In spite of the fact that Georgia is considered rather rich of fresh water re- sources our research showed that the major rivers of The Caspian Sea basin are polluted Keywords: with different contaminants like, nitrates, ammonium nitrogen. Heavy metals, oil prod- Water pollution ucts, pesticides and other toxic chemicals. From researched rivers the most polluted are Contaminants Mashavera and Kazretula (Bolnisi Municipality). They are mainly contaminated with toxic River basin releases of joint-stock company, Madneuli's activities. The rivers are also polluted from Toxic chemicals other plants, agricultural activities and farms. To protect the public and the environment Pesticides from toxic releases the government should prevent pollution by requiring industries to Suspended particles reduce their use of toxic chemicals and restore and strengthen protection for all water Mineralization objects. Concerted actions are needed to safely manage the use of toxic chemicals and develop monitoring and regulatory guidelines.
    [Show full text]
  • ESIA 07 Environmental Baseline Pdf / 3.7 MB
    Chapter 7 Environmental Baseline WREP Sectional Replacement Project, Georgia Environmental and Social Impact Assessment Final TABLE OF CONTENTS 7 ENVIRONMENTAL BASELINE ........................................................................ 7-1 7.1 Introduction ............................................................................................... 7-1 7.1.1 Background .................................................................................................... 7-1 7.1.2 Literature Reviews .......................................................................................... 7-1 7.1.3 Corridor and Route-Specific Field Surveys ..................................................... 7-2 7.1.4 Geographical Context ..................................................................................... 7-3 7.2 Geology, Geomorphology and Geohazards .............................................. 7-4 7.2.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................... 7-4 7.2.2 Geology .......................................................................................................... 7-4 7.2.3 Geomorphology .............................................................................................. 7-5 7.2.4 Geohazards .................................................................................................... 7-5 7.3 Soils and Ground Conditions .................................................................. 7-11 7.3.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Republic of Georgia - Country Report
    Republic of Georgia - Country Report WATER RESOURCES OF GEORGIA AND THEIR USE Quick assessment Water resources are one of the most important natural resources of Georgia. There are 26060 rivers with total length 58987 km. A base of hydrographic network are small rivers with length less than 25km and total length 50480 km. Georgia's territory is divided in two main regions: Black sea basin and Caspian Sea basin. Total natural river runoff from the territory of Georgia is 56.4km3 and to the territory (from Armenia and Turkey) - 8.74 km3. Thus, total water supplies amount for 65.4 km3. The biggest river in Georgia is Rioni which annual runoff is 12.6 km3 . There are large rivers in Western Georgia like Inguri (5.9 km3), Chorohi (8.9 km3), Kodori (4.1 km3), Supsa (1.4 km3), Bzib (3.0 km3) and others. In Eastern Georgia there are Kura (7.2 km3), Alazani (3.1 km3), Aragvi (1.4 km3), Big Liahvi (1.4 km3), Khrami (1.0 km3), lori (0.8 km3) and others. There are 850 lakes in Georgia which total area is 170 km2. There are 734 glaciers with total area 513 km2 on the Main Caucasus Ridge. More than 250 th.ha are covered by swamps including 220 th.ha in Western Georgia and 31 th.ha in its Eastern part. There are 43 water reservoirs including 34 for irrigation and 9 for power generation. Total useful capacity of all water reservoirs amounts for 2222.6 mln.m3. Water supplies in glaciers, water reservoirs and swamps are 35km3, thus total fresh water resources amount for 100km3.
    [Show full text]
  • Runoff Map of Georgia Runoff Map Runoff Map of Georgia
    Runoff map of Georgia Hydrological modelling of water balance Stein Beldring (Ed.) 27 2017 REPORT Runoff map of Georgia Published by: Norwegian Water Resources and Energy Directorate Editor: Stein Beldring Authors: Stein Beldring (NVE), Marina Kordzakhia (NEA) and Søren Elkjær Kristensen (NVE) Printing: NVEs hustrykkeri Circulation: 50 Cover: Mtkvari River at Vardzia. Photo by Stein Beldring. ISBN 978-82-410-1579-3 ISSN 1501-2832 Summary: A map of 30-year mean annual runoff for Georgia is a major result of the project ‘Institutional Cooperation between Ministry of Energy and the National Environmental Agency of Georgia, and the Norwegian Water Resources and Energy Directorate’. The overall goal of the project is to make reliable assessments of hydropower energy resources in Georgia. The runoff map is determined using results from a spatially distributed hydrological model that simulates the water balance for the entire land surface of Georgia and upstream areas in neighbour countries. Keywords: runoff map, hydrological model, meteorology, hydrology, water balance Norwegian water resources and energy directorate (NVE) Middelthunsgate 29 Postboks 5091 Majorstua 0301 OSLO Telephone: 22 95 95 95 Web: www.nve.no March 2017 2 Contents Preface ................................................................................................. 4 Summary ............................................................................................. 5 1 Introduction ................................................................................... 6
    [Show full text]
  • Contemporary Georgian Fiction
    CONTEMPORARY GEORGIAN FICTION Texts copyright © 2012 by the individual contributors Translation and introduction copyright © 2012 by Elizabeth Heighway This edition © 2012 by Dalkey Archive Press First edition, 2012 All rights reserved Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Contemporary Georgian fiction / edited and translated by Elizabeth Heighway. -- 1st ed. p. cm. ISBN 978-1-56478-716-3 (pbk. : alk. paper) -- ISBN 978-1-56478-751-4 (cloth : alk. paper) 1. Short stories, Georgian--Translations into English. 2. Georgian fiction--20th century--Translations into English. I. Heighway, Elizabeth. PK9168.2.E6B47 2012 899’.969--dc23 2012004231 This book is published thanks to the support of the Ministry of Culture and Monument Protection of Georgia Partially funded by the National Lottery through Arts Council England, and a grant from the Illinois Arts Council, a state agency www.dalkeyarchive.com Cover: design and composition by Sarah French Printed on permanent/durable acid-free paper and bound in the United States of America CONTEMPORARY GEORGIAN FICTION TRANSLATED AND EDITED BY ELIZABETH HEIGHWAY Dalkey Archive Press Champaign | Dublin | London CONTENTS INTRODUCTION IX MARIAM BEKAURI Debi 3 LASHA BUGADZE The Round Table 9 ZAZA BURCHULADZE The Dubbing 21 DAVID DEPHY The Chair 35 TEONA DOLENJASHVILI Real Beings 38 GURAM DOCHANASHVILI The Happy Hillock 64 REZO GABRIADZE The White Bridge 95 KOTE JANDIERI Cinderella’s Night 99 IRAKLI JAVAKHADZE Kolya 114 DAVIT KARTVELISHVILI The Squirrel 148 BESIK KHARANAULI Ladies and Gentlemen! 163 MAMUKA KHERKHEULIDZE A Caucasian Chronicle 174 ARCHIL KIKODZE The Drunks 183 ANA KORDZAIA-SAMADASHVILI Rain 212 ZURAB LEZHAVA Love in a Prison Cell 216 MAKA MIKELADZE A Story of Sex 233 AKA MORCHILADZE Once Upon a Time in Georgia 247 ZAAL SAMADASHVILI Selling Books 297 NUGZAR SHATAIDZE November Rain 305 NINO TEPNADZE The Suicide Train 351 AUTHOR BIOGRAPHIES 357 INTRODUCTION When I was approached about translating an anthology of contempo- rary Georgian literature I was both delighted and intrigued.
    [Show full text]
  • Third National Environmental Action Programme of Georgia
    Third National Environmental Action Programme of Georgia Tbilisi 2018 Ministry of Environmental Protection and Agriculture of Georgia expresses its deep respect and gratitude towards the Delegation of the European Union to Georgia, in particular, personally to Mr. Janos Herman and Mr. Alvaro Ortega Aparicio, for supporting the preparation of the National Environmental Action Programme of Georgia. The Ministry expresses appreciation to Georgian and European experts involved in the development of the Programme: Toomas Pallo, Khatuna Gogaladze and Maia Vashakidze. The Ministry also expresses its gratitude to everyone who participated in the elaboration of the document. Preperation process of NEAP was led by: Levan Davitashvili – Minister of Environmental Protection and Agriculture of Georgia Nino Tandilashvili – Deputy Minister of Environmental Protection and Agriculture of Georgia Preperation process of NEAP at an initial stage was led by: Gigla Agulashvili – Former Minister of Environment and Natural Resources Protection of Georgia Ekaterine Grigalava – Former Deputy Minister of Environment and Natural Resources Protection of Georgia NEAP Preperation process was coordinated by: Nino Tkhilava – Head of the Department of Environment and Climate Change Maia Javakhishvili – Deputy Head of the Department of Environment and Climate Change Gizo Chelidze – Head of the Department of Hydro-melioration and Land Management Tamar Aladashvili – Director of the LEPL Environmental Information and Education Centre Kakha Lomashvili – Senior Specialist of
    [Show full text]