Individual Monitoring Individual Monitoring Practical Radiation Technical Manual
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Personal Radiation Monitoring
Personal Radiation Monitoring Tim Finney 2020 Radiation monitoring Curtin staff and students who work with x-ray machines, neutron generators, or radioactive substances are monitored for exposure to ionising radiation. The objective of radiation monitoring is to ensure that existing safety procedures keep radiation exposure As Low As Reasonably Achievable (ALARA). Personal radiation monitoring badges Radiation exposure is measured using personal radiation monitoring badges. Badges contain a substance that registers how much radiation has been received. Here is the process by which a user’s radiation dose is measured: 1. The user is given a badge to wear 2. The user wears the badge for a set time period (usually three months) 3. At the end of the set time, the user returns the badge 4. The badge is sent away to be read 5. A dose report is issued. These steps are repeated until monitoring is no longer required. Badges are supplied by a personal radiation monitoring service provider. Curtin uses a service provider named Landauer. In addition to user badges, the service provider sends control badges that are kept on site in a safe place away from radiation sources. The service provider reads each badge using a process that extracts a signal from the substance contained in the badge to obtain a dose measurement. (Optically stimulated luminescence is one such process.) The dose received by the control badge is subtracted from the user badge reading to obtain the user dose during the monitoring period. Version 1.0 Uncontrolled document when printed Health and Safety Page 1 of 7 A personal radiation monitoring badge Important Radiation monitoring badges do not protect you from radiation exposure. -
Electrostatics of Two Suspended Spheres (Eletrost´Atica De Duas Esferas Suspensas)
Revista Brasileira de Ensino de F´ısica, v. 34, n. 3, 3308 (2012) www.sbfisica.org.br Electrostatics of two suspended spheres (Eletrost´atica de duas esferas suspensas) Fernando Fuzinatto Dall'Agnol1, Victor P. Mammana and Daniel den Engelsen Centro de Tecnologia da Informa¸c~aoRenato Archer, Campinas, SP, Brasil Recebido em 25/2/2011; Aceito em 6/2/2012; Publicado em 21/11/2012 Although the working principle of a traditional electroscope with thin metal deflection foils is simple, one needs numerical methods to calculate its foil's deflection. If the electroscope is made of hanging spheres instead of foils, then it is possible to obtain an analytical solution. Since the separation of the charged spheres is of the order of their radius the spheres cannot be described as point charges. We apply the method of image charges to find the electrostatic force between the spheres and then we relate the voltage applied to their separation. We also discuss the similarity with the sphere-plane electrostatic problem. This approach can be used as an analytical solution for practical problems in the field of electrodynamics and its complexity is compatible with undergraduate courses. Keywords: electroscope, electrometer, method of image, image charge, electrostatic, sphere-sphere. Apesar da simplicidade do princ´ıpiode funcionamento do eletrosc´opiotradicional feito de folhas met´alicas finas, ´enecess´ariom´etodos num´ericospara calcular a deflex˜aodas folhas. Se o eletrosc´opiofor feito de esferas penduradas ao inv´esde folhas, ent~ao´eposs´ıvel obter uma solu¸c~aoanal´ıtica. Como a deflex˜aodas esferas car- regadas ´eda ordem dos seus raios, as esferas n~aopodem ser descritas como cargas pontuais. -
Lab 1 Electrostatics
Electrostatics Goal: To make observations of electrostatic phenomena and interpret the phenomena in terms of the behavior of electric charges. Lab Preparation Most of what you will see in this lab can be explained simply by the following: Like charges repel and unlike charges attract. These repelling and attracting forces that occur can be found using Coulomb’s law, which is stated as !! !! � = � !! where F is the electrostatic force, k is the Coulomb constant (8.99 x 109 Nm2/C2), q1 and q2 are the charges the objects carry, and r is how far apart the objects are. A neutral atom of a substance contains equal amounts of positive and negative charge. The positive charge resides in the nucleus, where each proton carries a charge of +1.602 x 10-19 C. The negative charge is provided by an equal number of electrons associated with and surrounding the nucleus, each carrying a charge of -1.602 x 10-19 C. Macroscopically sized samples of everyday materials usually contain very nearly equal numbers of positive and negative charges. When some dissimilar materials are rubbed together, some charges are transferred from one material to the other leaving each object with a small net charge. For example, when a glass rod is rubbed with silk, the rod usually ends up with a positive charge and the silk ends up with a negative charge. Materials can be cast into two electrical categories: insulators and conductors. The atomic or molecular structure of the material determines whether some charges are free to move (a conductor, such as metallic materials) or largely fixed in place (an insulator). -
Electric Charges Observations Observations
Welcome to PY106 Setting the Channel Number for Your Clicker -The syllabus is your guide to this course. It contains information about the discussions, labs., the class, lab. and 1. Press and release the “CH” button. exam. schedules and grading scheme, etc. 2. While the light is flashing red and green, enter the two digit - Discussion sessions begin today! channel code “41” for this class. - Labs. begin on Jan. 28. 3. After the second digit is entered, press and release the - Assignment 1 is a hand-in, and will be posted on Blackboard “CH” button. The light should flash green to confirm. soon. It is due on Tuesday (Jan. 28) 10:00pm. 4. Press and release the “1/A” button. The light should flash - Most other assignments are posted on WebAssign. To amber ONCE to confirm. If it flashes continuously, there is access the assignment, you need to acquire an access code probably an error and you should try it again. from WebAssign. Instructions for WebAssign can be found in the syllabus. - Lecture notes can be downloaded from http://physics.bu.edu/~okctsui/PY106.html. Note that the URL is case sensitive. 1 2 Electric charges There are two kinds of electric charge, positive and negative. Objects are generally charged by either acquiring extra electrons (a net negative charge), or giving up electrons (a net positive charge). Electric Charge Forces between charged objects can be very large. Such forces are really what stop us from falling through the floor. In other words, what we called the normal force is really associated with repulsive forces between electrons. -
Physics 42 Lab: Static Electricity
Physics 42 Lab: Static Electricity Charge can neither be created nor destroyed: it can only be moved around! The purpose of the lab is to play with static electricity by moving charge around. You will charge objects by friction, induction and polarization and determine the charge with an electroscope. You will draw cute pictures showing each step and how the charges distribute to result in a final charge. The following cartoon sketch is an example of showing how a metallic sphere is charged by induction using a ground. This is the type of sketch you will draw today for each activity, describing what is happening for each step and summarizing your results. I will grade your lab based on neatness and clear explanations! Sample: Charging a metal sphere by induction using a negatively charged rod (a) A neutral metallic sphere, with equal numbers of positive and negative charges. (b) The electrons on the neutral sphere are redistributed when a charged negatively charge rubber rod is placed near the sphere. (c) When the sphere is grounded, some of its electrons leave through the ground wire. (d) When the ground connection is removed while leaving the rod close to the sphere, the sphere has excess positive charge that is nonuniformly distributed. (e) When the rod is removed, the remaining electrons redistribute uniformly and there is a net uniform distribution of positive charge on the sphere. Summary: Charging a neutral metal sphere by induction using a negative rod results in a positive charged sphere! **************************************************************************************** -
The Ionising Radiations Regulations 2017
Title of document 4 ONR GUIDE THE IONISING RADIATIONS REGULATIONS 2017 Document Type: Nuclear Safety Technical Inspection Guide Unique Document ID and NS-INSP-GD-054 Revision 7 Revision No: Date Issued: April 2019 Review Date: April 2022 Professional Lead – Approved by: K McDonald Operational Inspection Record Reference: CM9 Folder 1.1.3.979. (2020/209725) Rev 6: Update to include reference to the Ionising Radiations Regulations 2017 Revision commentary: Rev 7: Updated review period TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. 2 2. PURPOSE AND SCOPE ..................................................................................................... 2 3. THE IONISING RADIATIONS REGULATIONS 2017 .......................................................... 2 4. PURPOSE OF THE IONISING RADIATIONS REGULATIONS 2017 ................................. 3 5. GUIDANCE ON ARRANGEMENTS FOR THE IONISING RADIATIONS REGULATIONS 2017 ..................................................................................................................................... 3 6. GUIDANCE ON INSPECTION OF ARRANGEMENTS AND THEIR IMPLEMENTATION.. 5 7. FURTHER READING ........................................................................................................ 16 8. DEFINITIONS .................................................................................................................... 16 9. APPENDICES ................................................................................................................... -
Dosimeter Comparison Chart
DOSIMETER COMPARISON CHART Instadose®+ Instadose® EPD or APD TLD Dosimeter OSL Dosimeter Dosimeter Dosimeter Dosimeter Cost $ $ $ $$$$ Photon Photon Photon Photon Photon Beta Beta Neutron DEEP - Hp(10) DEEP - Hp(10) Neutron Neutron Measurements SHALLOW - Hp(0.07) SHALLOW - Hp(0.07) DEEP - Hp(10) DEEP - Hp(10) DEEP - Hp(10) SHALLOW - Hp(0.07) SHALLOW - Hp(0.07) SHALLOW - Hp(0.07) EYE - Hp(3) EYE - Hp(3) Read Out Accumulated Accumulated Accumulated Accumulated Accumulated (On-Demand) (On-Demand) (Lab Processing) (Lab Processing) & Dose Rate Unlimited On- Demand Dose Reads Re-Calibration Required Wearer Engagement High High Low Low High Online Management Portal (Website) Provider Dependent NVLAP Highly manual Accreditation process Immediate Online Badge Reassignment Provider Dependent Archiving Dose (Wearer) Meets Legal Highly manual Dose of Record process for meeting Requirements accreditation NO Collection/ Must be collected to Redistribution meet legal dose of Required record requirements Read/View Dose Data on Your Smartphone Automatic (Calendar-set) Dose Reads Wireless Radio Transmission of USB plug-in to PC Dose Data Communication Immediate High Dose Alerts Upon Successful Communication Instadose Dosimeters use direct ion storage (DIS) TLD (Thermoluminescent OSL (Optically EPDs (Electronic Descriptions technology to measure ionizing radiation through Dosimeter) measures Stimulated Personal Dosimeter) interactions that take place between the non- ionizing radiation Luminescence or APDs (Active volatile analog memory cell, which is surrounded exposure by assessing Dosimeter) measures Personal Dosimeter) by a gas filled ion chamber with a floating gate the intensity of visible ionizing radiation makes use of a diode that creates an electric charge enabling ionized light emitted by a crystal exposure when radiation (silicon or PIN, etc.) to particles to be measured by the change in the inside the detector when energy deposited in the detect “charges” induced electric charge created. -
New Techniques of Low Level Environmental Radiation Monitoring at Jlab
Abstract #188 - ANIMMA International Conference, 7-10 June 2009, Marseille, France 1 New Techniques of Low Level Environmental Radiation Monitoring at JLab Pavel Degtiarenko and Vladimir Popov, Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility contribution of operational gamma dose was evaluated Abstract—We present the first long-term environmental indirectly during special measurements. Direct continuous radiation monitoring results obtained using the technique of pulse measurements and long-term monitoring of operational gamma mode readout for the industry-standard Reuter-Stokes RSS-1013 dose rates at needed levels of sensitivity and stability were argon-filled high pressure ionization chambers (HPIC). With novel designs for the front-end electronics readout and impractical due to cost and complexity of available solutions. customized signal processing algorithms, we are capable of Recently developed pulse-mode readout electronics for detecting individual events of gas ionization in the HPIC, caused Ionization Chambers [1] allowed us to successfully make these by interactions of gammas and charged particles in the gas. The measurements. HPIC hardware may be characterized as one of technique provides enough spectroscopic information to the most stable and reliable types of ionizing radiation distinguish between several different types of environmental and detectors. The number of ion pairs produced by a radiation man-made radiation. The technique also achieves a high degree of sensitivity and stability of the data, allowing long-term field in the fixed amount of gas filling the HPIC is independent environmental radiation monitoring with unprecedented of temperature and other environmental parameters. Ultimately precision. reliable and stable charge collection and measurement in the Index Terms—Environmental radiation monitoring, ionization low-level radiation fields may be achieved by using the pulse- chambers, noise measurement, radiation detection circuits, signal mode operation of the readout electronics. -
An Overview of NCRP Commentary No. 19 Objectives of This Presentation
Key Elements of Preparing Emergency Responders for Nuclear and Radiological Terrorism An Overview of NCRP Commentary No. 19 Objectives of this Presentation • Provide an overview of the Commentary to allow audiences to become familiar with the material. • Focus on key points discussed in the Commentary. • Provide additional explanations for the recommendations. Background • Commentary was prepared at the request of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). • Recommendations are intended for DHS and state and local authorities who prepare emergency responders for terrorist incidents involving radiation or radioactive materials. Background • Commentary builds on previous NCRP reports – NCRP Report No. 65, Management of Persons Accidentally Contaminated with Radionuclides (1980). – NCRP Report No. 138, Management of Terrorist Events Involving Radioactive Material (2001). Background • Commentary No. 19 is limited to the key elements of preparing emergency responders for nuclear and radiological terrorism. • Details of implementation are left to the DHS in concert with state and local authorities. Serving on the NCRP Scientific Committee SC 2-1 that prepared this Commentary were: John W. Poston, Sr., Chairman Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas Steven M. Becker Brian Dodd The University of Alabama at Birmingham BDConsulting School of Public Health Las Vegas, Nevada Birmingham, Alabama John R. Frazier Brooke Buddemeier Auxier & Associates, Inc. Department of Homeland Security Knoxville, Tennessee Washington, D.C. Fun H. Fong, Jr. Jerrold T. Bushberg Centers for Disease Control and Prevention University of California, Davis Atlanta, Georgia Sacramento, California Ronald E. Goans John J. Cardarelli MJW Corporation Environmental Protection Agency Clinton, Tennessee Cincinnati, Ohio Ian S. Hamilton W. Craig Conklin Baylor College of Medicine Department of Homeland Security Houston, Texas Washington, D.C. -
Radiation Monitoring Units: Planning and Operational Guidance
HPA-CRCE-017 Radiation Monitoring Units: Planning and Operational Guidance N J Thompson, M J Youngman, J Moody, N P McColl, D R Cox, J Astbury, S Webb and S L Prosser © Health Protection Agency Approval: June 2011 Centre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards Publication: July 2011 Environmental Hazards and Emergencies Department £21.00 Chilton, Didcot, Oxfordshire OX11 0RQ ISBN 978-0-85951-690-7 This report from HPA Centre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards reflects understanding and evaluation of the current scientific evidence as presented and referenced in this document. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In the event of a radiation emergency, there may be a requirement to establish a Radiation Monitoring Unit (RMU) to undertake radiation monitoring of the public (population monitoring). A RMU is used to determine levels of radioactive contamination in or on people and any subsequent requirement for decontamination. It will also inform decisions regarding the need for any medical interventions for persons contaminated with radioactive material. This document is to aid emergency planners when producing specific plans for radiation monitoring units. It is provided in two distinct sections. The first substantive section of the report (section 4) provides detailed information for emergency planners including information to inform the selection of suitable accommodation and equipment. A basic description of the process for people monitoring and data collection is also provided in this section since these may impact upon these early planning considerations. The second substantive section of the report (section 5) focuses on the more detailed operational aspects of the RMU’s lifecycle and begins with a structured discussion to aid decision regarding RMU activation. -
Radiation Protection
C.I.12 Radiation Protection Chapter 12 of the FSAR should provide information on radiation protection methods and estimated occupational radiation exposures of operating and construction personnel during normal operation and AOO. (In particular, AOO may include refueling; purging; fuel handling and storage; radioactive material handling, processing, use, storage, and disposal; maintenance; routine operational surveillance; ISI; and calibration.) Specifically, this chapter should provide information on facility and equipment design, planning and procedures programs, and techniques and practices employed by the applicant to meet the radiation protection standards set forth in 10 CFR Part 20, and to be consistent with the guidance given in the appropriate regulatory guides, where the practices set forth in such guides are used to implement NRC regulations. As warranted, this chapter should specifically reference needed information that appears in other chapters of the FSAR. The information that is typically present in Chapter 12, includes a discussion of how radiation practices are incorporated into plant policy and design decisions; a general description of the radiation source terms; radiation protection design features, including a description of plant shielding, ventilation systems, and area radiation and airborne radioactivity monitoring instrumentation; a dose assessment for operating and construction personnel; and a discussion of the design of the health physics facilities. C.I.12.1 Ensuring that Occupational Radiation Exposures Are As Low As Is Reasonably Achievable C.I.12.1.1 Policy Considerations The applicant should describe the management policy and organizational structure related to ensuring that occupational radiation exposures are ALARA. The applicant should describe the applicable responsibilities and related activities to be performed by management personnel who have responsibility for radiation protection and the policy of maintaining occupational exposures ALARA. -
Evaluation of Fernald
Draft ADVISORY BOARD ON RADIATION AND WORKER HEALTH National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Review of the General Steel Industries Special Exposure Cohort (SEC) Petition-00105 and the NIOSH SEC Petition Evaluation Report Contract No. 200-2009-28555 SCA-SEC-TASK5-0005 Prepared by S. Cohen & Associates 1608 Spring Hill Road, Suite 400 Vienna, Virginia 22182 July 2009 [Redacted version – October 2, 2009] Disclaimer This document is made available in accordance with the unanimous desire of the Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health (ABRWH) to maintain all possible openness in its deliberations. However, the ABRWH and its contractor, SC&A, caution the reader that at the time of its release, this report is pre-decisional and has not been reviewed by the Board for factual accuracy or applicability within the requirements of 42 CFR 82. This implies that once reviewed by the ABRWH, the Board’s position may differ from the report’s conclusions. Thus, the reader should be cautioned that this report is for information only and that premature interpretations regarding its conclusions are unwarranted. Effective Date: Revision No.: Document No.: Page No.: July 24, 2009 0 SCA-SEC-TASK5-0005 Page 2 of 50 S. COHEN & ASSOCIATES: Document No. SCA-SEC-TASK5-0005 Technical Support for the Advisory Board on Effective Date: Radiation & Worker Health Review of July 24, 2009 – Draft NIOSH Dose Reconstruction Program Redacted version – October 2, 2009 Revision No. 0 Review of the General Steel Industries Special Exposure Cohort (SEC) Petition-00105