DOCSLIB.ORG

Sudbury Master Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sudbury Master Plan SUDBURY MASTER PLAN BASELINE REPORT VOLUME I Adopted by the Sudbury Planning Board [date placeholder] Sudbury Master Plan BASELINE REPORT Volume 1 February 19, 2021 Prepared for the Sudbury Master Plan Steering Committee Table of Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 5 Community Profile ........................................................................................................................................ 7 Transportation ............................................................................................................................................ 17 Housing ....................................................................................................................................................... 34 Economic Development .............................................................................................................................. 47 Historic and Cultural Resources .................................................................................................................. 70 Town Services ............................................................................................................................................. 87 Open Space and Recreation ...................................................................................................................... 106 Natural Resources ..................................................................................................................................... 118 Land Use .................................................................................................................................................... 134 List of Tables Table 1: Median Age Regional Comparison (2000-2017) ............................................................................. 9 Table 2. Sudbury Population by Age (2000 to 2017) .................................................................................. 10 Table 3. Projected Growth of Population Ages 65 and older in Sudbury, 2020 and 2030 ......................... 11 Table 4: Race and Ethnicity of Sudbury Residents (2000-2017) ................................................................. 12 Table 5: People with a Disability in Sudbury, 2017 ..................................................................................... 13 Table 6: Educational Attainment of Residents (Aged 25 Years and Older) in Sudbury (2000-2017) ......... 14 Table 7: Regional Educational Attainment (2017) ...................................................................................... 15 Table 8: Change in Median Household Income (2000-2017) ..................................................................... 15 Table 9: Household Composition in Sudbury (2000-2017) ......................................................................... 16 Table 10. Comparison of Crash Volumes, Sudbury and Nearby Communities (1990-2016) ...................... 25 Table 11. Age of Housing in Sudbury, 2017 ................................................................................................ 35 Table 12. Change in Housing Types in Sudbury, 2000-2017 ....................................................................... 35 Table 13. Multi-Family Residential Development Constructed from 2010 to May 2019 ........................... 36 Table 14: Tenure of Occupied Units in the Region, 2017 ........................................................................... 39 Table 15. Annual Median Home Sale Prices in Sudbury, Neighboring Communities, Middlesex County, and Massachusetts, 2014-2018 .................................................................................................................. 40 Table 16: Household and Family Income of Sudbury Residents, 2000-2017 ............................................. 41 Table 17. Income Distribution Based on Household Occupancy, 2015 ...................................................... 41 Table 18: Families and Individuals Below the Poverty Level in the Past 12 Months in Sudbury, 2000-2017 .................................................................................................................................................................... 42 Table 19: Percentage of Individuals and Families Below the Poverty Level in the Past 12 Months in Sudbury and its Neighbors, 2017 ................................................................................................................ 42 Table 20: Severely Cost-Burdened Households in Sudbury, 2015 .............................................................. 44 Table 21: Chapter Subsidized Housing Inventory (SHI) for Sudbury and its Neighbors, 9/14/17 .............. 45 Sudbury Master Plan | Baseline Report (Volume 1) February 19, 2021 i Table 22: Jobs per Resident Index .............................................................................................................. 47 Table 23: Total Jobs by Geography ............................................................................................................. 48 Table 24: Population by Geography ............................................................................................................ 48 Table 25: Gross Regional Product by 2-Digit NAICS Code, 2017 ................................................................. 50 Table 26: Employment by 2-Digit NAICS Code, 2018 .................................................................................. 51 Table 27: Employment & Earnings, Top 20 4-Digit NAICS, Sudbury ........................................................... 52 Table 28: Sector Job Growth, Sudbury........................................................................................................ 53 Table 29: Employment by 2-Digit SOC Code, 2018 ..................................................................................... 54 Table 30: Employment & Earnings, Top 20 4-Digit SOC, Sudbury .............................................................. 55 Table 31: Median Annual Earnings by Occupation ..................................................................................... 56 Table 32: Industry of Employment of Residents vs. Sudbury Job Base ...................................................... 58 Table 33: Unemployment Rate Comparison, 2017 ..................................................................................... 59 Table 34: Labor Force Participation Rate, 2017 .......................................................................................... 60 Table 35: Sudbury Employers with 100+ Employees .................................................................................. 62 Table 36: Sudbury Retail Businesses, 2017 ................................................................................................. 63 Table 38: Cultural Landscapes in Sudbury .................................................................................................. 78 Table 39: Number of Police Department Calls, 2008-2018 ........................................................................ 87 Table 40: Number of Fire Department Calls, 2008-2019 ............................................................................ 89 Table 41. Inventory of Recreation and Open Space Land (2019) ............................................................. 107 Table 42: Chapter 61 Properties ............................................................................................................... 109 Table 43: Public Land with Public Access .................................................................................................. 110 Table 44: Impaired Waterbodies in Sudbury ............................................................................................ 125 Table 45: Rare species observed in Sudbury ............................................................................................ 128 Table 46: Summary of Local Land Use Regulation in Sudbury .................................................................. 135 Table 47: Land Coverage Summary (2016) ............................................................................................... 138 Table 48. Types of Residential Structured Permitted, 2009-2018 ............................................................ 139 Table 49: Sudbury Zoning Bylaw Summary (2018) ................................................................................... 141 List of Figures Figure 1. Population Projections for Sudbury to 2040 .................................................................................. 7 Figure 2: Regional Comparison, Population Change (1990-2010) ................................................................ 8 Figure 3. Distribution of Age Groups in the Population (2000-2017) ......................................................... 10 Figure 4: Percentage of Non-White Alone, Two or More Races, or Hispanic or Latino in Sudbury (2000- 2017) ........................................................................................................................................................... 12 Figure 5: Comparison Non-White Alone and Hispanic or Latino (2000-2017) ........................................... 13 Figure 6: Median Household and Family Incomes of Sudbury and Its Neighbors (2017) ........................... 16 Figure 7. Traffic Volumes on Peakham Road, North of Austin Road .........................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Sudbury, Assabet and Concord Wild and Scenic River Conservation Plan
    The Sudbury, Assabet and Concord Wild and Scenic River Conservation Plan 2019 Update The Sudbury, Assabet and Concord Wild and Scenic River Conservation Plan May 2019 Update Sudbury, Assabet and Concord Wild and Scenic River Stewardship Council c/o National Park Service 15 State St Boston, MA 02109 617-223-5049 TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................ 2 Map of the Watershed ................................................................................................... 3 I. Introduction ............................................................................................................. 4 History of the Wild and Scenic River Designation Management Principles of Partnership Wild and Scenic Rivers Achievements Resulting from Designation Changes in the Region Since 1996 Role of the River Stewardship Council Purpose and Process of the Update How to Use this Update II. The River Management Philosophy ........................................................................ 11 Goals of the Plan A watershed-wide Approach III. Updates to the Administrative Framework ............................................................. 13 IV. Threats to the Outstandingly Remarkable Resource Values .................................... 14 V. Resource Management .......................................................................................... 15 Overview Public and Private Lands Water Resources – Water Quality Water Resources – Water Quantity
    [Show full text]
  • Choose Framingham Newsletter
    WELCOME TO THE CHOOSE FRAMINGHAM NEWSLETTER Choose Framingham Newsletter October 31, 2019 - In This Issue: 2nd Annual Oktoberfest Sanofi Genzyme New Facility Halstead Framingham Manufacturer of the Year Qura, Inc. Vacant Storefront Program New Businesses in Downtown Oktoberfest - Photo Credit Itala Keller Downtown Framingham, Inc. Hosts 2nd Annual Oktoberfest On Saturday, October 5, Downtown Framingham, Inc. (DFI) held its 2nd Annual Oktoberfest, which drew a crowd of over 500 people. The event spanned from City Hall Plaza on Concord Street to the Framingham Station parking lot at 417 Waverly Street, which is scheduled to open later this year. Four areas along the route were activated with street performers, activities, food, drinks, and other activities. On City Hall Plaza, attendees were able to shop vendors for soap, coffee, beauty products, jewelry and more, including Viva's Flowers, which Qura, Inc. recently opened at 79 Concord Street in Framingham. Medical Technology Company in Framingham Qura, Inc. is a medical technology company based in Framingham at 1 Grant Street. They are also a founding member of the MetroWest Life Sciences Network. Choose Framingham caught up with the company's Co-Founder, Doug Adams, to find out what's in store for Qura and why they chose Framingham. Tell us a little about Qura, Inc. - what Photo Credit Itala Keller do you do? The parking lot next to Framingham Station became a beer Qura has developed the first active, wireless garden featuring Framingham's own Jack's Abby and Exhibit 'A' and continuous eye pressure sensor for Brewing Company. Teams from major sponsors Loga do glaucoma that collects actionable data in real Marcizio, Wegman's, MutualOne Bank, and TD Bank were on time, facilitating timely and targeted medical site, while Framingham Station cooked up some samples of or surgical intervention for the 80MM people what will be on their menu later this year.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Annual Report Table of Contents
    2018 Annual Report Table of Contents Section Page(s) Annual Note from the Executive Director 1 Executive Summary 2‐3 Mission Statement 4‐7 Needs Assessment 8‐11 Measurable Outcomes 12‐15 Board of Directors and Community Supporters 16‐19 Annual Note from the Executive Director For me, 2017 was a year of introductions, observations, and understanding the goals and issues facing both businesses and residents. On the other hand, 2018 was punctuated by placemaking projects, events, and improved business engagement. One thing is certain: Downtown Framingham, Inc.’s (DFI) growing capacity has made its mark on the MetroWest area. With sustainable staffing, DFI can continue to meet the merits of the 4‐point Main Street America model. And through effective outreach, DFI can continue to quickly assess and respond to myriad internal and external forces shaping our cultural, urban area. This year, DFI placed a renewed focus on aggregating, assessing, and reporting feedback on everything from proposed government policies to neighborhood shopping habits. Local decision makers, including Framingham’s City Council, Traffic Commission, and Marijuana Task Force, critically weighed fresh insights from residents and shopkeepers to better understand our fast‐changing urban environment, which in turn informed their own voting behaviors. DFI’s relationship‐building strategies are the foundation of our tagline—“building business, community, and culture.” The confluence of community and business engagement, witnessed through tactics such as cultural events, business technical assistance, digital marketing, and placemaking projects, collectively stitched a better‐connected area primed to effectively collaborate—even when most stakeholders are physically bound to individual commercial spaces.
    [Show full text]
  • Making the Case for Expanding Commuter Rail Service Between Worcester and Boston
    AN INDEPENDENT VOICE FOR RESPONSIBLE GOVERNMENT CONNECTING THE HEART OF THE COMMONWEALTH WITH THE HUB OF THE UNIVERSE: MAKING THE CASE FOR EXPANDING COMMUTER RAIL SERVICE BETWEEN WORCESTER AND BOSTON Report No. 00-1 January 27, 2000 500 Salisbury Street • Worcester, Massachusetts • 01609-1296 •Telephone: 508/799-7169 Facsimile: 508/799-4720 • www.wrrb.org EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The MBTA should introduce expanded commuter rail service to Worcester consisting of ten operations in each direction per weekday as promised in the final environmental impact report issued by the Executive Office of Environmental Affairs in 1997. That report projected that by 2001 daily weekday inbound ridership at the Worcester Station would reach 414 passengers. The MBTA's most recent ridership audit (February 1999) indicates that current inbound ridership is 917 or more than double the projected number. From these figures (which do not include the number of passengers returning to Worcester), it would appear that the demand warrants additional service. Furthermore, even under the new system of assessing the efficiency of MBTA services that was established in the FY00 State Budget, it is likely that the expanded commuter rail service between Worcester and Boston would be deemed economically feasible. Finally, the amount of commuter parking available and planned in Worcester compares very favorably with other stations on the Framingham line. (Worcester has one parking space available for every 2.2 passengers whereas Framingham has one for every 13.5 passengers.) The main obstacle to expanded service appears to be the limited availability of rolling stock (locomotives and particularly passenger coaches) that expanded rail service would require.
    [Show full text]
  • Town of Framingham Historic Preservation Plan
    Town of Framingham Historic Preservation Plan Adopted: July 24, 2002 Framingham Historical Commission Laurie Evans-Daly, Chair Elizabeth Funk, Vice Chair Mary Murphy, Secretary Gerald Couto Waldo Lyon David Marks Robert Snider Stephen Herring, Town Historian Donna Jacobs, Framingham Department of Planning & Economic Development Table of Contents Page 1. Preamble 1.1 Historic Preservation Goals ........................................................................................5 1.2 History of Growth and Development in Framingham .............................................6 1.3 Profile of Framingham ................................................................................................8 2. Framingham's Preservation Planning Efforts 2.1 Municipal ....................................................................................................................14 2.2 Private Preservation Organizations .........................................................................20 2.3 Private Citizens Efforts .............................................................................................24 2.4 State .............................................................................................................................25 2.5 Federal ........................................................................................................................29 2.6 Action Recommendations ............................................................................. 29 3. The Cultural Resources Inventory 3.1 The Inventory
    [Show full text]
  • To Download the PDF File
    FALL NEWSLETTER THE WREN November 2013 Sudbury Valley Trustees Welcomes Lisa Vernegaard as Executive Director By Colin Anderson, Board President After an extensive search, the SVT Board of Directors was delighted to announce that Lisa Vernegaard would be taking over the leadership of SVT, and by the time this newsletter reaches our supporters, she will have completed her first weeks as SVT’s seventh Executive (continued on page 2) Director. We were gratified at the number and caliber of candidates who expressed interest in this posi- tion. Candidates applied from across the eastern half of the United States, offering a variety of backgrounds and some amazing qualifications. In the end, we determined that the best candidate for the job had been working extensively in our watershed for many years and was already known to a number of the staff and board at SVT. She also happens to live right next door in Maynard. Although born and raised in Utah, Lisa has lived and worked in New England for most of her adult life. Since earning her master’s degree in Forest Science at Yale, she has spent the last 20 years of her career at The Trustees of Reservations. Lisa’s knowledge of our watershed and SVT’s 7th Executive Director, (continued on page 2) Lisa Vernegaard PARTNERING WITH HOPKINTON Fruit Street Property and Elmwood Farm Preserved by Conservation Restriction By Christa Collins, Director of Land Protection, and Susan Crane, Land Protection Specialist June was a great month for Hopkinton with the permanent protection of over 225 acres of open space by conservation restrictions (CRs) now held or co-held by Sudbury Valley Trustees.
    [Show full text]
  • Changes to Transit Service in the MBTA District 1964-Present
    Changes to Transit Service in the MBTA district 1964-2021 By Jonathan Belcher with thanks to Richard Barber and Thomas J. Humphrey Compilation of this data would not have been possible without the information and input provided by Mr. Barber and Mr. Humphrey. Sources of data used in compiling this information include public timetables, maps, newspaper articles, MBTA press releases, Department of Public Utilities records, and MBTA records. Thanks also to Tadd Anderson, Charles Bahne, Alan Castaline, George Chiasson, Bradley Clarke, Robert Hussey, Scott Moore, Edward Ramsdell, George Sanborn, David Sindel, James Teed, and George Zeiba for additional comments and information. Thomas J. Humphrey’s original 1974 research on the origin and development of the MBTA bus network is now available here and has been updated through August 2020: http://www.transithistory.org/roster/MBTABUSDEV.pdf August 29, 2021 Version Discussion of changes is broken down into seven sections: 1) MBTA bus routes inherited from the MTA 2) MBTA bus routes inherited from the Eastern Mass. St. Ry. Co. Norwood Area Quincy Area Lynn Area Melrose Area Lowell Area Lawrence Area Brockton Area 3) MBTA bus routes inherited from the Middlesex and Boston St. Ry. Co 4) MBTA bus routes inherited from Service Bus Lines and Brush Hill Transportation 5) MBTA bus routes initiated by the MBTA 1964-present ROLLSIGN 3 5b) Silver Line bus rapid transit service 6) Private carrier transit and commuter bus routes within or to the MBTA district 7) The Suburban Transportation (mini-bus) Program 8) Rail routes 4 ROLLSIGN Changes in MBTA Bus Routes 1964-present Section 1) MBTA bus routes inherited from the MTA The Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA) succeeded the Metropolitan Transit Authority (MTA) on August 3, 1964.
    [Show full text]
  • Study Report Proposed H. H. Richardson Depot Historic District Framingham, Massachusetts
    Study Report Proposed H. H. Richardson Depot Historic District Framingham, Massachusetts Framingham Historic District Commission Community Opportunities Group, Inc. September 2016 Study Report Proposed H. H. Richardson Depot Historic District September 2016 Contents Summary Sheet ..................................................................................................................................... 3 Public Hearings and Town Meeting ..................................................................................................... 4 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 4 Background to the Current Proposal ................................................................................................ 5 Local Historic Districts and the Historic Districts Act ................................................................... 6 Local Historic Districts vs. National Register Districts .................................................................. 7 Methodology Statement ........................................................................................................................ 8 Significance Statement ......................................................................................................................... 9 Historical Significance ..................................................................................................................... 9 Architectural Description ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Northwest FRAMINGHAM's RURAL LANDSCAPE BENEFITS
    WINTER NEWSLETTER THE WREN February 2012 Northwest Meet Our New AmeriCorps MassLIFT Framingham’s Rural Members Landscape Benefits SVT would like to introduce the two new AmeriCorps MassLIFT (Massachusetts Land Initiative for from Harrington Tomorrow) members that joined the SVT team last September for an Conservation 11-month service term. Ashley Davies is serving as a Regional Conservationist Restriction for the Land Protection program, and Audra Valaitis is serving as a Land By Christa Collins, Director of Land Protection Steward for the Stewardship program. Ashley is from Dartmouth, George and DD Harrington of Framingham are familiar faces Massachusetts and is now a permanent around SVT, in part because George is a past board member and resident of Northborough. Ashley president, and now serves as a regular office volunteer; in part studied Law, Policy, and Society at Ashley Davies and Audra because the number of conservation donations they have made are Northeastern University and has a J.D. Valaitis: SVT appreciates almost too numerous to count on one hand. from Roger Williams University School the experience, knowledge, Between 1983 and 2000, the Harringtons donated three parcels of Law. Ashley has worked at and vol- and conviviality that they unteered with several environmental and bring to our Wolbach of land along scenic Edmands Road in Framingham, now known Farm office. as Harrington Fields. In 2007, the Harringtons made a gift of a land conservation organizations, includ- conservation restriction on their 80-acre Baiting Brook Meadow ing the Aquidneck Land Trust, MA Department of Environmental Farm on Nixon Road, where they grow and sell Christmas trees.
    [Show full text]
  • Train Schedule Franklin to Boston
    Train Schedule Franklin To Boston Persuasible and resemblant Zacherie never prize preferentially when Matt formulizes his cumberments. When Constantine ensheathes his Bangladesh soothsays not enchantingly enough, is Bobbie hibernal? Nutrimental and flurried Jefferson soled her sweetings myelitis ord and budgeting wailingly. On that entire line between South railway in Boston and Franklin Station. FRANKLIN MASS WHDH A kitchen was killed after being a by a Commuter Rail card in Franklin Saturday According to transit police. Only employee timetables are scheduled for additional trains! Apply to help resolve any concrete evidence, alongside a passenger operations. Boxing and schedules. 600- Blues Clues 630- Dinosaur Train 700- Paw Patrol 730- Dora The. Most economical and. Japan Train Announcer. Rachel's Table Meal surrender of Franklin County to deliver meals. Includes information as you may be made. Render slideshow if request is to training course, schedules posted on. Travel by sip from Franklin MA to New York NY Check schedules and cheap tickets from 53 for specific train system between Franklin MA to New York NY. How to carpet a commercial air train schedule when my area. Transit Services NH Rideshare Program NH Department of. Choose what stops and a spawn area rapid transit kitchener train struck a joint employee timetables are mandatory on a lot in the delaware river of franklin train steamed west. The tender schedule operating with fewer cars men tracks than were claimed by the. Station 117's central location between Boston MA and Providence RI. From boston burns to schedule at kalyan junction railway stations are scheduled for a curve near south dakota.
    [Show full text]
  • Framingham Open Space and Recreation Plan DRAFT November
    Framingham Open Space and Recreation Plan DRAFT November 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1: Plan Summary ....................................................... 3 Chapter 2: Introduction ............................................................ 6 Chapter 3: Community Setting ................................................ 9 Chapter 4: Environmental Inventory and Analysis ................ 15 Chapter 5: Inventory of Lands ............................................... 48 Chapter 6: Community Vision ............................................... 77 Chapter 7: Analysis of Need ................................................. 78 Chapter 8: Goals and Objectives .......................................... 85 Chapter 9: The Seven Year Action Plan ............................... 87 LIST OF MAPS ................................................................... 105 APPENDICES (PENDING) ................................................. 106 Chapter 1: Plan Summary A. Purpose The overall purpose of the 2020 Open Space and Recreation Plan (OSRP) is to serve as a guide for protecting, managing, improving, and expanding Framingham’s open space and recreation resources in the face of continuing development pressures. More specifically, the purposes of this OSRP are: • To identify unique open space and recreation assets and places that have ecological, recreational, civic, historic and/or scenic value; • To prioritize the open space and recreation needs for all citizens of Framingham; • To identify specific goals, objectives, and recommended priority
    [Show full text]
  • Diagnostic Feasibility Study Jennings Pond Natick
    DIAGNOSTIC/FEASIBILITY STUDY Jennings Pond Natick, Massachusetts APRIL 1986 i. JB/CV/S c v/ • ' .'<* *^^ST^;X<-^ ^\ft^ <A-J ••.,=) * 'StB£'OK/iL VV >»V?rrfff WHITMAN & HOWARD,INC. JENNINGS POND NATICK, MASSACHUSETTS DIAGNOSTIC/FEASIBILITY STUDY TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION I. POND AND WATERSHED CHARACTERISTICS PAGE A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY B. INTRODUCTION 1. Study Objectives 2. Jennings Pond Restoration Association, Inc C. JENNINGS POMP WATERSHED CHARACTERISTICS , 1. Size and Location 9 2. Climatology 9 3 . Topography and Geology 15 4. Soils 21 5. General Hydrology 28 6. Population 32 7. Land Use 34 8. Zoning 36 D. JENNINGS POND CHARACTERISTICS 1. Size and Location 38 2. Mo rphome t ry 38 3. Jennings Pond Uses 42 a. Historical Use 42 b. Current Use 45 4. Public Access 45 E. PROBLEMS AND MANAGEMENT PRACTICES 1. Pertinent Findings of Past Reports 47 2. Past Pond Management 48 3. Current Watershed Management Practices 51 F. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION 52 SECTION II. DIAGNOSTIC STUDY A. INTRODUCTION 54 1. Sample Site Locations 55 2. Sampling Methodology 55 3. Sample Analyses 58 4. Basis of Data Analyses 58 PAGE B. PHYSICAL DATA 1. Temperature 58 2. Secchi-Disc Transparency 61 CHEMICAL DATA 1. Dissolved Oxygen 63 2. pH, Alkalinity and Salinity 68 3. Conductivity 74 4. Suspended Solids 76 5. Total Dissolved Solids 76 6. Total Phosphorus 79 7. Nitrogen 82 8. Summary of Chemical Data 90 D BIOLOGICAL DATA 1. Bacteriological 90 2. Phytoplankton and Chlorophyll a_ 94 3. Aquatic Macrophytes 98 4. Fisheries 105 5. Birds and Waterfowl 106 6. Surrounding Vegetation 106 E. ADDITIONAL SAMPLING .
    [Show full text]