DOI: 10.11649/a.1625 Article No.: 1625 Dagmara Wasilewska is an Indologist, doctoral student at the University of Silesia’s Faculty of Philology. She teaches at the Department of Oriental Studies and General Linguistics of the University of Silesia’s Institute of English. nr 13/2019 r. e-mail:
[email protected] Dagmara Wasilewska Paradoxes in Jīva Gosvāmī’s concept of the soul, path to perfection and liberation Introduction n the most general sense, a paradox (from the Greek parádoxos ‘unexpected, strange’) is a statement that runs contrary to widely held beliefs, and as such seems incomprehensible. IParadox itself is part of a broader category, that of aporia (from the Greek aporiai ‘puzzle, difficulty’), which we could define as an insurmountable obstacle in reasoning, stemming from the inability to decide the value of arguments for and against a given notion, and thus allowing contradictory premises. In logic, a paradox is a statement that, despite valid reasoning from true premises, leads to a self-contradiction (Aduszkiewicz, 2004, p. 379). A par- adox arises when correct, seemingly convincing reasoning based on indisputable premises nevertheless produces an unacceptable conclusion (Piecuch, 2011, p. 31). Matthew Bagger, whose research revolves around the religious uses of paradox, defines it as an apparently absurd statement (e.g. one that entails a self-contradiction), which we are nevertheless ready to accept as true, because it is supported by at least one form of epistemic authority we recognize (Bagger, 2007, p. 3). Reason is, obviously, one form of such authority, but so are testimony, tradition, the opinions of respected specialists and masters, even revelation or divination.