DOCSLIB.ORG

Romaine Hydroelectric Complex Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Romaine Hydroelectric Complex Project Bureau Joint d’audiences Review Panel publiques sur l’environnement Report 256 Romaine Hydroelectric Complex Project Investigation and Public Hearing Report February 2009 The concept of the environment The commissions of the Bureau d’audiences publiques sur l’environnement examine the projects submitted to them from a sustainable development perspective, applying the concept of the environment used by higher courts, a concept that encompasses biophysical, social, economic and cultural aspects. Acknowledgments The Joint Review Panel thanks the individuals and organizations that contributed to its work, and the staff at the Bureau d’audiences publiques sur l’environnement and the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency who provided the necessary support for the production of this report. Publication and Distribution Bureau d’audiences publiques sur l’environnement Édifice Lomer-Gouin Telephone: 418-643-7447 575 Saint-Amable, Office 2.10 (Toll-free): 1-800-463-4732 Quebec City, Quebec G1R 6A6 Web site: www.bape.gouv.qc.ca E-mail: [email protected] Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency Place Bell Canada Telephone: 613-957-0700 160 Elgin Street, 22nd Floor Facsimile: 613-957-0941 Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0H3 Web site: www.ceaa-acee.gc.ca E-mail: [email protected] Documentation concerning the Joint Review Panel’s work may be obtained from the Bureau d’audiences publiques sur l’environnement and the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency. Legal Deposit – Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec, 2009 ISBN 978-2-550-55298-7 (printed version) ISBN 978-2-550-55299-4 (PDF) 2 February 27, 2009 Line Beauchamp Minister of Sustainable Development, Environment and Parks Édifice Marie-Guyart, 30th Floor 675 René Lévesque Blvd East Quebec City, Quebec G1R 5V7 Minister: It is with great pleasure that I submit the report on Hydro-Québec’s proposed project to develop a hydroelectric complex on the Romaine River by the Bureau d’audiences publiques sur l’environnement. The Commission was chaired by Michel Germain, with the participation of commissioner Louis Dériger, and began its investigative work and public hearings on October 27, 2008. On completion of its analysis, the Commission concluded that the project fulfilled three of the objectives of the Quebec Energy Strategy, namely to enhance security of energy supply, to make better use of energy as a lever of economic development, and to give more say to local and regional communities and First Nations. In this regard, the Commission submits to the attention of the decision-making authorities concerned various matters that require commitments, amendments or clarification before any government authorizations may be issued. Yours truly, Pierre Renaud President February 25, 2009 Pierre Renaud President Bureau d’audiences publiques sur l’environnement Édifice Lomer-Gouin 575 Saint-Amable Street, Office 2.10 Quebec City, Quebec G1R 6A6 Dear Sir: I am pleased to submit the report by the Commission responsible for the investigation and public hearings into the Romaine Hydroelectric Complex project by Hydro-Québec. The Commission’s analysis and findings are based on the file forwarded by the Minister of Sustainable Development, Environment and Parks as well as on documentation and additional information added to the file by the Commission in the course of its investigation. The analysis primarily focused on the concerns, opinions and suggestions of the participants in the public hearings. I would like to thank everyone who showed an interest in the Commission’s work by asking questions or submitting briefs. I would also like to acknowledge the resource persons for their collaboration in this public process. Lastly, I would like to give thanks to my colleague Louis Dériger and the team members who assisted us throughout the process. Yours truly, Michel Germain Commission Chair Édifice Lomer-Gouin 575 Saint-Amable, Office 2.10 Quebec City, Quebec G1R 6A6 Telephone: 418-643-7447 (toll free): 1-800-463-4732 Fax: 418-643-9474 [email protected] www.bape.gouv.qc.ca February 27, 2009 The Honourable Jim Prentice Line Beauchamp Minister of the Environment Minister of Sustainable Development, House of Commons Environment and Parks Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0A6 Édifice Marie-Guyart, 30th Floor 675 René Lévesque Blvd East Quebec City, Quebec G1R 5V7 Mr Minister, Madam Minister: The Joint Review Panel for Hydro-Québec’s Romaine Hydroelectric Complex Project has completed the mandate it received on September 5, 2008. As Chairman of the Panel, I am pleased to submit our report to you. In this instance, the BAPE Commission and the Joint Review Panel agreed to draft a joint report. The Commission reviewed the project from a sustainable development perspective, applying the concept of environment defined by the higher courts of the country, a concept that encompasses the biophysical, social, economic and cultural aspects of development. It also meets the requirements of the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act and the Quebec Environment Quality Act, as stipulated in the Canada-Quebec Agreement on Environmental Assessment Co-operation. I would like to express my gratitude to my colleagues Jean-Guy Beaudoin and Louis Dériger as well as to the members of the team that worked with us. I would also like to underscore the essential input of the members of the public who participated in the hearings. Yours truly, Michel Germain Chairman, Joint Review Panel Agence canadienne d’évaluation Bureau d’audiences publiques sur environnementale l’environnement Canadian Environmental Assessment Édifice Lomer-Gouin Agency Place Bell Canada, 22nd Floor 575 Saint-Amable, Office 2.10 160 Elgin Street Quebec City, Quebec G1R 6A6 Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0H3 Table of Contents Introduction............................................................................................................................. 1 Chapter 1 Participants’ Concerns and Opinions ............................................................ 13 Need for the project............................................................................................................13 Economic rationale for the project................................................................................. 16 Greenhouse gases ........................................................................................................ 17 Sustainable development................................................................................................... 17 Impacts on the natural environment................................................................................... 18 Woodland caribou ......................................................................................................... 18 Birdlife ........................................................................................................................... 18 Aquatic fauna ................................................................................................................ 19 Heritage......................................................................................................................... 19 Integrity of the Mingan Archipelago National Park Reserve of Canada ........................ 19 Coastal erosion.............................................................................................................. 20 Human environment........................................................................................................... 20 Quality of life.................................................................................................................. 20 Social impact ................................................................................................................. 22 Health and mercury ....................................................................................................... 23 Commercial and subsistence fisheries.......................................................................... 23 Recreation ..................................................................................................................... 24 Increased access to the territory ................................................................................... 25 Innu communities and the territory ................................................................................ 26 Tourism .........................................................................................................................27 Economic spinoffs.............................................................................................................. 27 Regional spinoffs........................................................................................................... 27 Maximizing regional spinoffs ......................................................................................... 29 Agreements ................................................................................................................... 31 Transmission lines ............................................................................................................. 32 Cumulative and transborder impacts ................................................................................. 32 Public participation............................................................................................................. 33 Environmental assessment process .................................................................................. 33 Romaine River Hydroelectric Complex Development
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Annexes Du Rapport Principal
    Nature et tourisme : L’écotourisme au Québec en 2002 Annexes du rapport principal Rapport produit par Éco Tour Conseils Etc. Maurice Couture, Adm. A. avec la collaboration de Sébastien Cloutier Tourisme Québec Table de concertation sur l’écotourisme au Québec Octobre 2002 Octobre 2002/ Nature et tourisme : L’écotourisme au Québec en 2002 Liste des annexes Annexe « A » : Fiches descriptives des principales ressources écotouristiques par région administrative Annexe « B » : Information sur l’offre d’une sélection de producteurs « spécialisés » en écotourisme du Québec Annexe « C » : Sélection de membres d’Aventure et Écotourisme Québec offrant des produits d’écotourisme Annexe « D » : Villages présentant des potentiels comme étape d’un circuit d’écotourisme ou comme lieu de séjour à proximité de milieux naturels Annexe E : Description des 150 produits offerts à destination du Canada à partir du site Web iExplore Annexe « F » : Exemples de produits concurrents au niveau international Annexe « G » : Exemples de produits offerts par des organismes internationaux de conservation Annexe « H » : Exemples de produits concurrents ailleurs au Canada Annexe « I » : Produits touristiques autochtones liés à de l’écotourisme ou du tourisme de nature Annexe « J » : Contenus descriptifs des guides touristiques 2001-2002 des ATR du Québec liés aux produits de tourisme de nature et d’écotourisme du Québec Annexe « K » : Contenus promotionnels des guides touristiques 2001- 2002 des ATR du Québec concernant les produits de tourisme de nature et
    [Show full text]
  • North American Megadam Resistance Alliance
    North American Megadam Resistance Alliance May 18, 2020 Christopher Lawrence U.S. Department of Energy Management and Program Analyst Transmission Permitting and Technical Assistance Office of Electricity Christopher.Lawrence.hq.doe.gov Re: Comments on DOE Docket No. PP-362-1: Champlain Hudson Power Express, Inc. and CHPE, LLC: Application to Rescind Presidential Permit and Application for Presidential Permit Dear Mr. Lawrence, The Sierra Club Atlantic Chapter and North American Megadam Resistance Alliance submit these comments on the above-referenced application of Champlain Hudson Power Express, Inc. (CHPEI) and CHPE, LLC (together, the Applicants) to transfer to CHPE, LLC ownership of the facilities owned by CHPEI and authorized for cross-border electric power transmission via a high voltage direct current line (the Project) by Presidential Permit No. PP- 362, dated October 6, 2014 (PP-362 or the Permit) .1 The Project is being developed by TDI, a Blackstone portfolio company. www.transmissiondevelopers.com Blackstone is a private investment firm with about $500 billion under management. www.blackstone.com The Sierra Club Atlantic Chapter, headquartered Albany New York, is responsible for the Sierra Club’s membership and activities in New York State and works on a variety of environmental issues. The Sierra Club is a national environmental organization founded in 1892. 1 On April 6, 2020, the Applicants requested that the Department of Energy (DOE) amend, or in the alternative, rescind and reissue PP-362 to enable the transfer of the Permit from CHPEI to its affiliate CHPE, LLC (the Application). On April 16, 2020, the Department of Energy (DOE) issued a Notice of “Application to Rescind Presidential Permit; Application for Presidential Permit; Champlain Hudson Power Express, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 General Information and Contacts
    1 General Information and Contacts 1.1 Nature of Project Champion Iron Mines Ltd. is a Canadian-based mining exploration and development company. Champion is one of the largest landholders of highly prospective iron ore claims, with holdings located southwest of Fermont and northeast of Schefferville, Quebec. Champion Iron Mines Ltd. intends to develop the deposit located on its Fire Lake North property near Fermont, Quebec. The project includes the construction of an access road linking the site to Route 389, along with the construction of a railway line and an ore storage area in Pointe-Noire. 1.2 Proponent Contact Information Project Title: Fire Lake North Iron Ore Project Proponent Name: Champion Iron Mines Ltd. Address: 630 René-Lévesque West, 18th Floor – 1850 Montreal QC H3B 1S6 Senior Manager: Tom Larsen President and Chief Executive Officer Phone: 514-316-4858 Fax: 514-393-9069 Project Manager: Jean-Luc Chouinard, Eng. M.Sc. Vice-President, Project Development [email protected] Phone: 514-973-4858 514-316-4858 Fax: 514-393-9069 1.3 Consultations Consultations have been held with local and regional stakeholders to gather as much information as possible on the local and regional biophysical environment as well as the social environment. Solid relationships and partnerships have been forged as a result of these discussions with the City of Fermont. Relations with the Innu Uashat mak Mani-Utenam (ITUM1) First Nation are progressing well, although it has not yet been possible to gather information that would be directly useful for the environmental assessment of the project. Consultations with ITUM have been held on a regular basis since 2009, consisting first of information sessions and discussions on various potential joint business opportunities.
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDIX O Summary of Stakeholder Consultation
    APPENDIX O Summary of Stakeholder Consultation Labrador Iron Mines Ltd Stakeholder Consultation Report Parameters: Start Date: 1 Jan 2005 End Date: 15 Dec 2008 Community Visit 30 May 2005 Kawawachikamach Participants: Summary: Introductory visit to Schefferville. Reviewed project proposal. No major Phillip Einish issues raised. Do not want to see any new mining resulting in the visual “eyesore” left Chief – Naskapi Nation behind by IOC. Aboriginals effectively shut out by IOC operations. John Mameamskum Naskapi Team Members: Erick Chavez Gerry Gauthier John Kearney Terence McKillen Meeting 23 Sep 2005 Participants: Summary: Initial MOU discussion and project introduction. No significant issues other Uashat Band Council than jobs and economic benefits. Gilbert Pilot Uashat Team Members: Joseph Lanzon Dan O'Rourke Meeting 21 Oct 2005 Uashat Meeting Participants: Summary: TRT rail capacity discussion. Upgrade on a yearly approach. Richard Bell TSH Team Members: Joseph Lanzon Dan O'Rourke Meeting 18 Nov 2005 Sept-Iles Participants: Summary: Meeting with Band officials in Sept-Iles and City Officials. Presentation of Normand Laprise LIM project. Norma Lebri Team Members: Joseph Lanzon Dan O'Rourke Meeting 1 Dec 2005 Participants: Summary: Meeting with Grand Chief - Innu of Labrador. Discussion on project and Ben Michel benefits for Labrador. Labrador Innu Team Members: Joseph Lanzon Dan O'Rourke Thursday, August 13, 2009 Page 1 of 40 Labrador Iron Mines Ltd Stakeholder Consultation Phone Call 2 Dec 2005 Participants: Summary: Reviewed Anglesey press release and discussed scope of project. Asked to Gilbert Pilot set up a meeting with Development Corporation and Band Council. Uashat Team Members: Terence McKillen Meeting 7 Mar 2006 Participants: Summary: Meeting with aboriginal leaders.
    [Show full text]
  • GCC(EI)/CNG 2013-2014 Annual Report
    40th Anniversary of the Grand Council of the Crees (Eeyou Istchee) YEARS 40 of MODERN CREE NATION-BUILDING A Special Tribute to the Trappers Who Stood Up for Our Rights Annual Report 2013-2014 Table of Contents Grand Council of the Crees (Eeyou Istchee) Message from the Grand Chief/Chairman 2 Message from the Deputy Grand Chief/ Vice-Chairman 12 Message from the Executive Director 18 Cree-Canada Relations 20 Cree-Québec Relations & Taxation 28 Natural Resources 43 Operations & Maintenance and Capital Grants 46 International Affairs 47 40th Anniversary of the Grand Council of the Crees (Eeyou Istchee) 52 Roundtable Community Tours 54 Cree Nation Government Message from the Director General 57 Message from the Treasurer 58 Government Services 61 Human Resources 66 Cree Human Resources Development 70 Environment and Remedial Works 83 Culture and Language 91 Capital Works and Services 105 Economic and Sustainable Development 115 Child and Family Services 133 Justice and Correctional Services 141 Eeyou Eenou Police Force 150 Leisure, Sports and Recreation 157 Youth Development 164 Cree Nation Youth Council 173 Cree First Nations – Chiefs and Offices 174 Council/Board Members – Executive/ Executive Committee Members 175 This year’s Annual Report celebrates the 40th year that the GCC(EI) was established through a look back in time. Front Cover Archive Photo: One of GCC’s first meetings held in a classroom by I. La Rusic, courtesy Beesum Communications. Annual Report 2013-2014 1 YEARS 40 of MODERN CREE NATION-BUILDING ᒋᔐᐅᒋᒫᐦᑳᓐ ᐅᑕᔨᒧᐎᓐ ᐁ ᐐᐦᑕᐦᒃ
    [Show full text]
  • Waste Rock and Water Management at the Tio Mine Summary of the Project Description
    Waste Rock and Water Management at the Tio Mine Summary of the Project Description Rio Tinto Fer et Titane WSP Canada Inc. Adress line 1 Adress line 2 Adress line 3 www.wspgroup.com WSP Canada Inc. 300-3450, boul. Gene-H.-Kruger Trois-Rivières (Qc) G9A 4M3 Tél. : 819 375-1292 www.wspgroup.com Waste Rock and Water Management at the Tio Mine Summary of the Project Description Final Version Approved by: Numéro de projet : 111-20171-02 J U N E 2 01 4 3450, boulevard Gene-H.-Kruger, bureau 300 ~ Trois-Rivières (Québec) CANADA G9A 4M3 Tél. : 819 375-8550 ~ Téléc. : 819 375-1217 ~ www.wspgroup.com Reference to be cited: WSP. 2014. Waste Rock and Water Management at the Tio Mine. Summary of the Project Description. Report produced for Rio Tinto Fer et Titane. 25 p. SUMMARY 1 GENERAL INFORMATION Rio Tinto Fer et Titane inc. (hereinafter “RTFT”) has operated, since 1989, the Havre-Saint-Pierre mine, consisting of a hemo-ilmenite deposit, at its Lake Tio mining property, located 43 km north of Havre-Saint-Pierre (see Figure 1). However, the mine has been in operation since 1950. The most recent data from the mining plan provides for the site to be in operation beyond 2050. According to this plan, the total amount of waste rock which will be generated exceeds the storage capacity available under the current mining leases, which will be reached by the end of 2017. RTFT would therefore like to obtain new land lease agreements for the disposal of waste rock to be generated until the end of the mine’s life.
    [Show full text]
  • Duplessis Manicouagan
    renseignements utiles SYMBOLES ET PICTOGRAMMES CARTE DE LA RÉGION TOURISTIQUE CÔTE-NORD Légende Matimekosh – Schefferville Kawawachikamach Lac-John (accessible par train à partir de Sept-Îles) Municipalité SYMBOLES Réserve autochtone Happy Valley- Route Goose Bay ET PICTOGRAMMES Chemin de fer Churchill Falls Route des Baleines Æ Abri pour Circuit gourmand ? Lieux d’accueil ¶ Restauration Village-relais pique-nique à Chasse saisonnier Route verte Traversier h Aire de ö Location U Chute ¶! Petit-déjeuner Trajet du N/M Bella-Desgagnés Labrador City Km 362 pique-nique d’équipement Emeril Junction LABRADOR ¢ Cuisinette ¶@ Dîner Aéroport Wabush Accès Internet w Location de chalet c Cuisine commune ¶# Souper Lieu d’accueil saisonnier sans fil gratuit L Location de vélo Fermont s Électricité , Salle de bains Lieu d’accueil permanent < Aéroport - Hôpital t Ornithologie privée M Agréé Bienvenue 30 ampères F Minifrigo b Parc et réserve naturelle Km 473 Procurez-vous la Carte touristique cyclistes u 50 ampères Salle de bains Fire Lake Blanc-Sablon p.82 n Motoneige partagée Parc marin du Saguenay – de la Côte-Nord dans nos bureaux R i v Bonne-Espérance v Saint-Laurent Fermont et i D Air climatisé Entrée directe d’information touristique (p. 218 à 220). è p.50 r e Blanc- la Route 389 S Brador @ Pêche º Salle de gym a i n Middle Bay Sablon t -  A Animaux admis Entrée gratuite u Rivière-Saint-Paul g u C s t Î a h Pêche blanche Ski alpin i n e m Lourdes-de- i Apportez votre vin $ Entrée payante n Vieux-Fort Blanc-Sablon d St.
    [Show full text]
  • Testimony of Chief Rene Simon Pessamit Lnnu First Nation Pessamit, Canada July 20, 2017 Ladies and Gentlemen of the State Of
    Testimony of Chief Rene Simon Pessamit lnnu First Nation Pessamit, Canada July 20, 2017 Ladies and gentlemen of the State of New Hampshire Site Evaluation Committee, my name is Paul Pouliot. I am the Sag8mo of the Cowasuck Band of the Pennacook Abenaki People, based in Alton, NH. Chief Rene Simon and the elected officials of Pessamit have asked me to deliver this message and thank you for the opportunity to speak at the Northern Pass public hearings. It is with confidence in a better future that the "Pessamit lnnu First Nation" is addressing you today. It is not Pessamit's intention to take a position on the impacts of the Northern Pass Project in New Hampshire. However, we want to share our experience with regard to the source of electricity and its environmental and social legitimacy. In 1973, the Supreme Court of Canada confirmed our Ancestral Rights, territories and the value of the Indigenous treaties with France and England . However, the Quebec Government challenged the Supreme Court's decision until1996 when the Supreme Court ruled against Quebec's position. ,.. ,~. 1 N~'TP(;5E. rvniV The Government of Quebec strategically allowed enough time fo completion of Hydro-Quebec, a government owned entity, to invade our Nitassina our homelands. As such, thirteen hydroelectric plants and eleven re~ were implanted on our homelands without impact studies, without our consent and without compensation. This state-run fraud now makes 29% of Hydro-Quebec's installed capacity which is illegally acquired at the expense of Pessamit. The Government of Quebec, which is Hydro-Quebec's sole shareholder, has become one of the largest and most profitable energy companies in the West.
    [Show full text]
  • It Was a Minute to Midnight: Quebec Crosses the Threshold of 17 % of Protected Areas
    PRESS RELEASE For immediate release It Was a Minute to Midnight: Quebec Crosses the Threshold of 17 % of Protected Areas Montreal, December 17, 2020 – The Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society, Quebec chapter (SNAP Québec) is very pleased that the Quebec government is now protecting 17 % of its territory, a significant step forward in favour of conservation in Québec. Today’s announcements add 66,000 km2 of protected areas, an area equivalent to 12 times Prince Edward Island. “We applaud the government’s will to achieve international protected area targets and play a leading role in terms of conservation. Quebec is only the second province in Canada to reach the 17 % target and occupies the first place in terms of total surface area protected with more than 257,000 km2, a surface area larger than the United Kingdom,” highlights Alain Branchaud, executive director of SNAP Québec. Protecting the Territory to Protect a Way of Life SNAP Québec congratulates the Cree Nation Government for its impressive leadership in conservation and is very pleased with the more than 39,000 km2 of newly announced protected areas in Eeyou Istchee. These are the result of extensive consultations with the communities conducted by the Cree Nation Government, notably with Cree trappers and hunters. The sites thus identified therefore represent territories of high biocultural significance for these communities. It is now 23 % of Eeyou Istchee that is protected from industrial development. “This region having been impacted by hydroelectric, mining and forestry activities, this network of protected areas will allow for the conservation of territories used since a time immemorial by the Cree.
    [Show full text]
  • The James Bay and Northern Quebec Agreement (JBNQA) Electronic Version Obtained from Table of Contents
    The James Bay and Northern Quebec Agreement (JBNQA) Electronic Version obtained from http://www.gcc.ca/ Table of Contents Section Page Map of Territory..........................................................................................................................1 Philosophy of the Agreement...................................................................................................2 Section 1 : Definitions................................................................................................................13 Section 2 : Principal Provisions................................................................................................16 Section 3 : Eligibility ..................................................................................................................22 Section 4 : Preliminary Territorial Description.....................................................................40 Section 5 : Land Regime.............................................................................................................55 Section 6 : Land Selection - Inuit of Quebec,.........................................................................69 Section 7 : Land Regime Applicable to the Inuit..................................................................73 Section 8 : Technical Aspects....................................................................................................86 Section 9 : Local Government over Category IA Lands.......................................................121 Section 10 : Cree
    [Show full text]
  • C S a S S C C S
    C S A S S C C S Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat Secrétariat canadien de consultation scientifique Research Document 2005/051 Document de recherche 2005/051 Not to be cited without Ne pas citer sans permission of the authors * autorisation des auteurs * A Comprehensive Framework for Un protocole d'évaluation des Assessing Changes in Fish Habitat changements de capacité de Productive Capacity Resulting From production de l'habitat du poisson Large Hydroelectric Projects lors de grands projets hydroélectriques Michel Bérubé, Richard Verdon, Gabriel Durocher, Jean-Christophe Guay Hydro-Québec Équipement Direction développement de projet et environnement 855 Sainte-Catherine est, 9ième étage Montréal, Québec H2L 4P5 * This series documents the scientific basis for the * La présente série documente les bases evaluation of fisheries resources in Canada. As scientifiques des évaluations des ressources such, it addresses the issues of the day in the halieutiques du Canada. Elle traite des time frames required and the documents it problèmes courants selon les échéanciers contains are not intended as definitive statements dictés. Les documents qu’elle contient ne on the subjects addressed but rather as progress doivent pas être considérés comme des énoncés reports on ongoing investigations. définitifs sur les sujets traités, mais plutôt comme des rapports d’étape sur les études en cours. Research documents are produced in the official Les documents de recherche sont publiés dans language in which they are provided to the la langue officielle utilisée dans le manuscrit Secretariat. envoyé au Secrétariat. This document is available on the Internet at: Ce document est disponible sur l’Internet à: http://www.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/csas/ ISSN 1499-3848 (Printed / Imprimé) © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 2005 © Sa majesté la Reine, Chef du Canada, 2005 ABSTRACT The Policy for the management of fish habitat and its No net Loss of habitat productive capacity by the Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO) represents a challenge for the hydroelectric industry in general.
    [Show full text]
  • Under Embargo Until February 23Rd 2021, 11:59 AM Eastern Time
    Under embargo until February 23rd 2021, 11:59 AM Eastern Time For the first time, a river is granted official rights and legal personhood in Canada Quebec, Canada, February 23, 2021 - The Muteshekau-shipu Alliance today announced the granting of legal personhood to the Magpie River, through the adoption of two parallel resolutions by the Innu Council of Ekuanitshit and the Minganie Regional County Municipality (RCM). The river is thus assigned nine rights, as well as potential legal guardians responsible primarily for ensuring that these rights are respected. This is the first such case in Canada. The announcement was made in partnership with the International Observatory on the Rights of Nature (IORN), based in Montreal, Canada, which drafted the resolutions in collaboration with the Alliance. The two resolutions, more than ten pages each and crammed with references, rest on multiple legal bases in national and international law and will help protect the river. The initiative is part of a global movement – particularly active in New Zealand, the United States and Ecuador – to recognize the rights of Nature. The Magpie River (Muteshekau-shipu in the Innu language) is an internationally renowned river nearly 300 km long. The river is recognized worldwide for its rapids and for whitewater expeditions, most notably by the prestigious National Geographic magazine, which ranked it among the top ten rivers in the world for whitewater rafting. The river’s protection has received regional consensus, but the plan to declare the river a protected area has been thwarted for years by state-owned Hydro-Québec, due to the waterway’s hydroelectric potential.
    [Show full text]