DOCSLIB.ORG

Rkch, 1PTS AXD Dissurskaih:NTS (A VPARENT and ACTUAL)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Rkch, 1PTS AXD Dissurskaih:NTS (A VPARENT and ACTUAL) COMBINED STATEMENT OF THE RKCh, 1PTS AXD DISSURSKAIh:NTS (A VPARENT AND ACTUAL) THE UX1TKD STATES FOLIC THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1878 COAlB I NED STATE llENT i)F TEER RECEIPTS A ND DISBU RS K 11 ENTS (APPARENT AiVD ACTUALl 'I'HE tJNITED STATES FOR TEIE I& is&-, nl beni ended tuu&. '30, 18'7~E. TREASURY DEPARTMENT IVAsHIN&ETCN, D. ('. , Deeembe& I, 1873. SEz: I» compliauce with instrn&tio»s received f&om yo», I have prepared tbr publication in the Bool- of Estimates a combined statement of the receipts and disburse1»ents of the Govern»1ent, by appropriatio»s, exclusive ot' the principal of the public debt, for the fiscal year ended J»n&* 30, 1873, exhibitiug the various so»&c&s of tl» revenues; th& apparent expenses of each brauch of the service under the several Depart1nc»ls, and of each D& p;«t»1&»t. on;«;co»nt of 'salnri&s, " "oEdjnary exp& nscs, " "public wo&k», " "miscellaneous, " and "unusnal and extraordinary;" an&1 the actual &.&1)&»&see of the same, a»d the actual revenues, by deductions frou1 them of those items which;1ppear i» both accounts by requirements of law, but which are not actual revenues or true expenCktures, and other iten1s on acco»»t of bra»ches of the se& & i«e i»tended to be self-supportiug. the expeuses and revenues of which must by l;&w enter into the accounts of the Treasury. I have the ho»or to be, very respectfully, yonr obedie»t servant, 'HAS F DONA VT Chaef of Warrant Drv&sion. Hou. WM. A. REOHARDSQN, Secretary of the Treas«ry. RECEIPTS 1 t J, Districts. Total by districts. Total by States. C~ross receipts. i Deductions. Xet receipts. Fi'rrnt Cax0riss— Maine: Aroostook, $13, 11( 01 Passamaquoddy. 92 739 59 Machias. :3& 04H 56 Frenchman's Bay. 36 45 Castine. :376 54 Waldoborough. 7, 35G Hl Wiscasset. , . 653 Gl Bath . 11, G35 2H Portland. 572, 008 27 Saco. 53 10 Kennebunk 6 29 Belfast. 7, 368 55 Bangor 16, 836 09 ,j'(25, 236 15 New Hampshire; Portsmouth . 23, 261 78 Vermont . 942, 097 22 Massachusetts: Newburyport 5rd, 450 73 Gloucester. 5, 662 36 Salem 4H, 238 17 Marblehtrad . 588 14 Boston. 20r 662, 215 43 Plymouth 22, 116 69 Fall River. 210, 724 31 Barnstable. 2 H55 38 New Bedford. 40, 867 26 Edgartown. ii78 91 21, 053 397 38 Rhode Island: Providence. 362, 031 33 Bristol . 338 00 Newport. .. .. 2, 350 H!? 3G4, r20 15 Connecticut: Middletown. 2, 364 12 New London. 33, 100 02 New Haven. :343, 552 24 Fairfield. 18, 590 42 Stonington. 1, 719 51 Gu99 32(i 31 Netv York: Genesee. 91, 399 60 Oswego. 921, 011 32 Dunkirk. 7, 852 77 Albany. 121, 121 60 Viagara. .. 6,'35, 774 49 Buffalo. 476, 678 62 Oswegatchie .. 290, 17o r7 New York 126, 824, 899 92 Champlain. 344) H45 29 Cape Vincent „. 59, 502 41 129, 77:3, 261 79 Vew Jersey: Perth Amboy. 892 65 Burlington. 302 20 Newark. 2, 187 79 :3, 3R2 64 Pennsylvania, : Philadelphia .. ir, 023, 930 83 Erie. 56, 865 93 Pittsburgh. 32, 593 59 H, 113, :390 35 Delaware. 20 502 7n Maryland: Baltimore. 7, i3:37, 407 70 Eastern. 28 81 Vienna. H06 85 7. 33R, 243 36, District of Columbia: Georgetown . 6, 584 64! RECEIPTS AND DISBIJRSEMENTS. REI, F IPTH. Districts. 'l otal by d&str&cts. Total by States. Gross receipts. Deductions. Net receipts. From Customs —Continued. Virginia: Richmond. BB6, 969 91 ', Norfolk. 31, 926 60 l Tappahannock. 137 97 Petersburg. .. .. 172, 295 29 Alexandria . 4, 555 06 8295&, H84 H3 ' West Virginia: Wheeling o&-l 65 ' North Carolina: Albemarle . 80 08 Pamlico .. 2, 137 39 Beaufort. 121 90 Wilmington. 115, 702 56 11~. 041 93; South Carolina: Charleston. 167& 648 39 Georgetown. 421 79 Beaufort. 37, 183 29 205&, 254 47 Georgia: Savannah. 197, 811 08 St. Mary' s. 1, 030 41 Brunswick. 8, 708 42 i 207, 549 91 Alabama: Mobile . 111&155 41 Selma. 4, 000 00 115, 155 41 [Btlisstssippi: Pearl River. 4 46 Natchez. 555 03 Vicksburg. 1& 100 81 i 1, 660 30 Florida: Pensacola . 78, 875 40 ~ Key West. 242, 918 51 Fernandina . 1, 650 24 St. Mark's. 592 16 St. John' s. 581 83 Apalachicola. .. 331 00 324, 949 14 &Louisiana: New Orleans. 3, 835, 758 13 Tech'. 318 97 3, 836, ()7& 10 i Texas: Texas. 507& 582 14 Paso del Norte. 27, 167 42 Saluria. 16, 005 52 Corpus Christi. 39, 659 2H i Brazos Santiago . 57, 852 91 648, 267 27 i Tennessee: Memphis . 55, 297 21 Nashville. 5, 017 82 60, 315 Kentucky: 03, Paducah. 17, 837 79 Louisville. 89, 599 H7 Ohio: 107, 437 66 Cincinnati 271, 467 54 Miami. 20, 299 07 Sandusky. .. 3, 369 39 Cuyahoga. 219, 417 45 Michigan: 514, 553 45 Detroit. 309, 427 62 Michigan . H82 45 Superior. 38, 605 97 Huron. 78, 056 63 Illinois: 426& 972 67 Cairo. 17, 883 20 Peoria. .. 3, 881 87 Quincy. 2) 474 51 Chicago. ', 158& 737 99, Indiana: 2. 182, 977 57 Evans' le. , »4(6 27 New 4. lbany. 4, .i. ls;&2 ' 9 924 79 RECEIPTS AND DISBURSEMENTS. 0 F.()EIPTH. Dis(, ricts. Total by districts. Tots, l by States. Crross receipts. Deductions. xct receipts. From Cas(osis —Continued. Missouri: St. Louis xl,. 448, 561 62 Wisconsi n: ldil waukee. 153, 736 05 Ioivii: Burlington. fi932 14 Dubuque 15, 152 56i Keokuk. 922 90 1&, 007 60 .& I 0 &1 t a u &i . 37 589 09 Oregon: Oregon 40, 993 92 Wi! Iamette 224& 220 96 '&65, 214 HH 5liunesota: Duluth. 1HH, 27H 74 Minne&oti& H, 516 66 196, (95 40 Calilornia: San Francisco . x, 167, 207 87 Washington Territory: Puget Hound. 18, 709 52 $188, OHO, 522 70 Less amount refunded for excess of deposits for uuascertained duties, cliarged as au expenditure under the head of "Repayment of excess of deposits for unas- certained duties ". ('k 120, 192 &90 Aiuount refunded for duties collected from importers ou articles sub- sequently exported, charged as au expenditure under thc hen&i of "Debentures and drawbacks ". 1, 17(i, 055 1 x Amount refunded to private parties for duties paid uu;irticles eu- titled to be admitted free, or at less rates, charged:is au expendi- ture under the head of "Refunding duties". .. )34, 552 (&6 Aruount refunded to claiiuants from sale of uuchiinie&l merchaudisc. charged as an expeuditure under the liead of "I.uchiimed mer- chandise ".. .. 1, -!RO HO A. mount returned to pay debentures aud other charges arising from duties, charged as an expeuditure uudcr the head of "Debentures and other charges " . !3 i. 65;i Hl Amount refunded for duties paid ou tea aiul coffee iu public stores or bonded warehouses on July 1, 1872, sul&ject to uo duty, charged as an expenditure under the head of "Refunding duty on tea an&I. .cofiee ". 2.i&. 231 R2 Amount of drawback of duties paid ou niaterials imported into the district" of Chicago, charged as an expenditure under the head of" Drawback on c ertain articles imported into the district of Chicago 1&92, 15.& 95 Amount of duties refunded which had 1&een p;iicl on merchandise de- stroyed or injured while in the custody of ofiicers of' the customs or in bonded warehouses, charged as an expeuditure under the head of "Refunding duty ou goods destroyed in warehouses ".. !lgi "1 Amount refuu&led to the Wiuoua aud Ht. I'eter's Railroad Con&pany for additional duties paid by itou railro;id iron, per act June 4, 1H72, charged as an expeuditure uuder the he;id of "Refunding certain duties paid by the Wiuoua and St. Peter's Railroad Com- pany" 3, 424 2H $4, 921, 684 01 tjll83, 1(37. R3R 66 From fines, penalties, and fort'eitures, (custouis service). 1, 169, 515 3R Less amount charged as an expenditure under the head of "Collect- ing the revenue from customs" ') ll, 920 63 Less amount paid to informers aud others as their share of penalties imposed by tice (Ioverumeut, charged as;u& expenditure under the head of "Distributive shares of fiues, penalties, aud forfeitures ".. !i26, 156 &1 I, ess repayment ot' nioneys accruing froni iiues, penalties, aud for- feitures, or other sources, erroueously receivccl;&ud covered into the Treasury before the paynient of the proper iuforuicrs' moieties. or other legal charges against the same, charged as;iu expenditure under the heacl of "Refunding nioneys erroneously received and covered into the Treasury " 1, 13R 01 I, 169, 515;3H From labor, dray;ige, and storage, (cnstcmis service). xl. 410 1!3 Fro&n weighiug fees, (custonis service) . 5(, 0&3 59 From services of United States otlicers, (custonis service) :)os& 51R 70 From emolument fees, (customs service). ;321 '& l o 61 From mileage of examiuers, (custoius service). 1, 738 90 796, 953 9R I.css aiuount expeu&lcd ou t!&ca& i&ccouuts, charged undei the he;id of collectingreveuue froiu customs". of "Expenses !&6. 953 OR I RECEIPTS AND DISIIURSEMENTS. RECEIPTS. Districts. Total by districts. Total by States. Gross receipts. Deductions. Net receipts. From Internal R« & n«&— Maine: 1st district. .. $124, 363 19 2d district. 27& H68 53 3d district 19, 108 03 4th district. o5, 864 49 5th district . 1'1, 087 25 $214, 291 49 New Hampshire: 1st district. .. 197, 440 96 2d district. .. :.. 105, 509 70 3d district. .. 18& 349 48 321, 300 14 Vermont: 1st district. 18& 978 84 ?d district.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • POTB Strategic Business Plan
    PORT OF TILLAMOOK BAY Strategic Business Plan Port of Tillamook Bay 4000 Blimp Boulevard Tillamook, OR 97141 December, 2009 Submitted by: The Benkendorf Associates Corp. 909 SW St. Clair Ave, Suite 9 Portland, Oregon 97205 Johnson Reid, LLC Allan E. Rumbaugh 319 SW Washington Street, Suite 1020 10500 SW Naeve Street Portland, Oregon 97204 Tigard, Oregon 97224 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. HISTORY & MISSION ........................................................................... 1 A. HISTORY ..................................................................................... 1 B. PORT ENABLING STATUTES ........................................................... 1 C. EXISTING MISSION ........................................................................ 2 D. STRATEGIC PLAN PROCESS .......................................................... 3 II. PORT DESCRIPTION ........................................................................... 4 A. FACILITIES AND PROPERTY ............................................................ 4 B. OPERATIONS ................................................................................ 5 C. POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ......................................................... 7 D. FINANCIAL CONDITION ................................................................ 11 III. MARKET AND TRENDS .................................................................... 21 A. NATIONAL TRENDS ..................................................................... 21 B. REGIONAL & LOCAL TRENDS ......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Conde Mccullough
    Conde McCullough Conde Balcom McCullough (May 30, 1887 – May 5, 1946) Conde McCullough was a U.S. bridge engineer who is primarily known for designing many of Oregon's coastal bridges on U.S. Route 101.[1] The native of South Dakota worked for the Oregon Department of Transportation from 1919 to 1935 and 1937 until 1946. McCullough also was a professor at Oregon State University. Early life Conde McCullough was born in Redfield, South Dakota, on May 30, 1887.[2] In 1891, he and his family moved to Iowa where his father died in 1904.[2] McCullough then worked at various jobs to May 30, 1887 [2] Born support the family. In 1910, he graduated from Iowa State Redfield, South Dakota, U.S. [3] May 5, 1946 (aged 58) University with a civil engineering degree. Died Oregon Career Nationality American Isaac Lee Patterson Bridge Buildings Yaquina Bay Bridge McCullough began working for the Marsh Bridge Company in Des Alsea Bay Bridge Moines, Iowa, where he remained for one year.[2] He then went to work for the Iowa State Highway Commission.[2] Conde moved to Oregon in 1916 and became an assistant professor of civil engineering at Oregon Agricultural College, and the sole structural engineering professor at the school.[2] In 1919 he became the head of the Bridge Division of the Oregon Department of Transportation, making him personally responsible for the design of Oregon's bridges at a time when the state was completing Highway 101. His designs are well known for their architectural beauty.[4] McCullough advocated that bridges be built economically, efficiently, and with beauty.[1] He helped design over 600 bridges, many with architectural details such as Gothic spires, art deco obelisks, and Romanesque arches incorporated into the bridges.[5] In 1928, he graduated from Willamette University College of Law and passed the bar the same year.[6] In 1935 he moved to San José, Costa Rica to help design bridges on the Pan-American Highway.
    [Show full text]
  • Hood River Bridge Replacement Environmental Studies, Design and Permit Assistance APRIL 25, 2018 April 25, 2018
    CONSULTANT SERVICES FOR Hood River Bridge Replacement Environmental Studies, Design and Permit Assistance APRIL 25, 2018 April 25, 2018 ATTN: Dale Robins Southwest Washington Regional Transportation Council (RTC) 1300 Franklin Street, 4th Floor Vancouver, Washington 98660 Re: Response to RFP Consultant Services for Hood River Bridge Replacement Environmental Studies, Design and Permit Assistance Dear Mr. Dale Robins and Selection Committee, For nearly 95 years, travelers have crossed the Columbia River using the Hood River Bridge, which connects Hood River, Oregon and the communities of White Salmon and Bingen in Washington state. While the travelers are diverse - farmer, hiker, trucker, tugboat operator, windsurfer - their need is the same: a safe, reliable connection between Oregon and Washington. Today, the Hood River Bridge is failing to meet modern transportation demands: deteriorating bridge members, combined with dimensional and weight restrictions for trucks, hamper the structure’s effectiveness and, quite possibly, the regional economy. The replacement of the bridge is a critical transportation improvement needed to support the interstate travel of motorized vehicles, pedestrians and bicyclists, and marine freight transport, which have significant local and regional economic and quality of life benefits. In 1999, a campaign to replace the existing bridge began, which then culminated into the 2003 Draft EIS, which was completed by Parsons Brinkerhoff now WSP. Following the Draft EIS, the firm conducted a Bridge TS&L study. From
    [Show full text]
  • BIG CREEK BRIDGE HAER No. OR-86 Oregon Coast Highway (U.S
    BIG CREEK BRIDGE HAER No. OR-86 Oregon Coast Highway (U.S. 101), spanning Big Creek Florence Vicinity Lane County Oregon PHOTOGRAPHS WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD National Park Service Western Region Department of the Interior San Francisco, California 94107 HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD BIG CREEK BRIDGE HAER No. OR-86 Location: Spanning Big Creek on the Oregon Coast Highway, US 101 (M.P. 175.02), approx. 15 miles north of Florence, Lane County, Oregon. USGS Heceta Head Quadrangle UTM Coordinates: 10.410665.489160 Date of Construction: 1931 Engineer: Conde B. McCullough. Oregon State Bridge Engineer Builders: Union Bridge Company, under a cooperative agreement with: Oregon State Highway Commission, Lane County, and the U.S. Bureau of Public Roads Present Owner: Oregon Department of Transportation Present Use: Highway Bridge Significance: The Big Creek Bridge is significant as one of the earliest examples ofreinforced concrete tied-arch bridge construction in the Pacific Northwest region of the United States. The Big Creek Bridge is also significant as the work of a master, Oregon State Bridge Engineer, Conde B. McCullough, and due to its thematic association with the design and construction of several other major reinforced concrete bridges designed by McCullough and erected along the Oregon Coast Highway in the 1930s. Conde Balcom McCullough served as State Bridge Engineer, and later as the Assistant State Highway Engineer for Oregon from 1919 until his death in 1946. McCullough is significant for his use of innovative bridge technology, and for his visually appealing designs. He has attained international recognition for the large-scale structures he designed to span the major rivers and estuaries along the Oregon coast for the completion of the Oregon Coast Highway in the 1930s.
    [Show full text]
  • A Context for Common Historic Bridge Types
    A Context For Common Historic Bridge Types NCHRP Project 25-25, Task 15 Prepared for The National Cooperative Highway Research Program Transportation Research Council National Research Council Prepared By Parsons Brinckerhoff and Engineering and Industrial Heritage October 2005 NCHRP Project 25-25, Task 15 A Context For Common Historic Bridge Types TRANSPORATION RESEARCH BOARD NAS-NRC PRIVILEGED DOCUMENT This report, not released for publication, is furnished for review to members or participants in the work of the National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP). It is to be regarded as fully privileged, and dissemination of the information included herein must be approved by the NCHRP. Prepared for The National Cooperative Highway Research Program Transportation Research Council National Research Council Prepared By Parsons Brinckerhoff and Engineering and Industrial Heritage October 2005 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF SPONSORSHIP This work was sponsored by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials in cooperation with the Federal Highway Administration, and was conducted in the National Cooperative Highway Research Program, which is administered by the Transportation Research Board of the National Research Council. DISCLAIMER The opinions and conclusions expressed or implied in the report are those of the research team. They are not necessarily those of the Transportation Research Board, the National Research Council, the Federal Highway Administration, the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, or the individual states participating in the National Cooperative Highway Research Program. i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The research reported herein was performed under NCHRP Project 25-25, Task 15, by Parsons Brinckerhoff and Engineering and Industrial Heritage. Margaret Slater, AICP, of Parsons Brinckerhoff (PB) was principal investigator for this project and led the preparation of the report.
    [Show full text]
  • 7. Gulph Creek Stone Arch Bridge (1789), Spanning Gulph Creek at Old Gulph Road, Upper Merion, Montgomery County, PA
    Chapter 3—Historic Context for Common Historic Bridge Types 7. Gulph Creek Stone Arch Bridge (1789), spanning Gulph Creek at Old Gulph Road, Upper Merion, Montgomery County, PA. HAER PA-309. 8. Possum Kingdom Stone Arch Bridge (1940-42), spanning Brazos River at State Route 16, Graford, Palo Pinto County, TX HAER TX-62. Figures 3-42 through 3-46 depict a drawing and examples of stone arch structures. Figure 3-42. Elevation drawing of stone arch bridge. Keystone Figure 3-43. Gulph Creek Stone Arch Bridge (1789), Old Gulph Road, Upper Merion, Montgomery County, Pennsylvania. This eighteenth century stone arch bridge is one of the oldest surviving bridges in Pennsylvania. Figure 44. “S" Bridge (first quarter nineteenth century), West of Cambridge, Ohio. This 1933 photograph shows an “S” Bridge on the Old National Road. 3-51 Chapter 3—Historic Context for Common Historic Bridge Types Figure 3-45. Cabin John Aqueduct Bridge (1864), MacArthur Boulevard, spanning Cabin John Creek at Cabin John, Maryland. With a single arch span of 220 feet, this bridge was the longest masonry arch bridge in the world until 1905. Figure 3-46. Possum Kingdom Stone Arch Bridge (1940-42), spanning Brazos River at State Route 16, Graford, Texas. This structure is an example of a Works Progress Administration-built stone arch bridge. 3-52 Chapter 3—Historic Context for Common Historic Bridge Types 3.2.2 Reinforced Concrete Melan/von Emperger/Thacher Arch History and Description: The first concrete arch bridge in the United States was a plain, un-reinforced concrete footbridge with a 31-foot span, constructed in Prospect Park, Brooklyn, New York, in 1871.
    [Show full text]
  • Interstate Certified Shellfish Shippers List
    MARCH 2020 Interstate Certified Shellfish * Shippers List * Fresh and Frozen Oysters, Clams, Mussels, Whole or Roe-on Scallops U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Public Health Service Food and Drug Administration INTRODUCTION THE SHIPPERS LISTED HAVE BEEN CERTIFIED BY REGULATORY AUTHORITIES IN THE UNITED STATES, CANADA, KOREA, MEXICO AND NEW ZEALAND UNDER THE UNIFORM SANITATION REQUIREMENTS OF THE NATIONAL SHELLFISH PROGRAM. CONTROL MEASURES OF THE STATES ARE EVALUATED BY THE UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION (FDA). CANADIAN, KOREAN, MEXICAN AND NEW ZEALAND SHIPPERS ARE INCLUDED UNDER THE TERMS OF THE SHELLFISH SANITATION AGREEMENTS BETWEEN FDA AND THE GOVERNMENTS OF THESE COUNTRIES. Persons interested in receiving information and publications F. Raymond Burditt about the National Shellfish Sanitation Program contact: National Shellfish Standard Office of Food Safety Division of Seafood Safety 5001 Campus Drive College Park, MD 20740-3835 (240) 402-1562 (FAX) 301-436-2601 [email protected] Persons interested in receiving information about the Charlotte V. Epps Interstate Certified Shellfish Shippers List (ICSSL) contact: Retail Food & Cooperative Programs Coordination Staff, HFS-320 Food and Drug Administration 5001 Campus Drive College Park, MD 20740-3835 (240) 402-2154 (FAX) 301-436-2632 Persons interested in receiving information about the ISSC Interstate Shellfish Sanitation Conference (ISSC) contact: Attn: Ken B. Moore, Executive Director 209-2 Dawson Road Columbia, SC 29223 (803) 788-7559 (FAX) 803-788-7576 Email: [email protected] Web Page: http://www.issc.org CFSAN Information Line 1-888-SAFEFOOD (723)-3366 ICSSL Monthly Listing FDA/CFSAN Web Homepage http://www.fda.gov/Food/GuidanceRegulation/FederalStateFoodPrograms/ucm2006753.htm NSSP Model Ordinance http://www.fda.gov/Food/GuidanceRegulation/FederalStateFoodPrograms/ucm2006754.htm 2 Definitions: Shellfish - All edible species of oysters, clams, mussels, and scallops;* either shucked or in the shell, fresh or frozen, whole or in part.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 70, No. 141/Monday, July 25, 2005/Notices
    42586 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 141 / Monday, July 25, 2005 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Riverside County MINNESOTA Corona High School, 815 W. 6th St., Corona, Lake Of The Woods County National Park Service 05000772 Canadian National Railways Depot, 420 N. National Register of Historic Places; Tulare County Main Ave., Baudette, 05000809 Notification of Pending Nominations Crawford House, 1184 Crawford Ave., Ramsey County Steamboat Springs, 05000782 and Related Actions Hamm, Theodore, Brewing Company, Nominations for the following COLORADO Minnehaha Ave. E, bet Payne Ave. and Stroh Dr., St. Paul, 05000832 properties being considered for listing Las Animas County or related actions in the National First Methodist Episcopal Church, 216 MISSOURI Register were received by the National Broom St., Trinidad, 05000783 Jackson County Park Service before June 25, 2005. Pursuant to § 60.13 of 36 CFR part 60 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Graphic Arts Building, 934 Wyandotte St., Kansas City, 05000810 written comments concerning the District of Columbia significance of these properties under Dumblane, Address Restricted, Washington, St. Louis County the National Register criteria for 05000784 Beverly Theater, 7740 Olive Blvd., University evaluation may be forwarded by United City, 05000811 GEORGIA States Postal Service, to the National St. Louis Independent City Register of Historic Places, National Muscogee County Park Service, 1849 C St. NW., 2280, Cadillac Automobile Company Building, Silver’s Five and Dime Storee—H.L. Green (Auto-Related Resources of St. Louis, Washington, DC 20240; by all other Co., (Columbus MRA) 1101–1103 Missouri MPS) 3224 Locust St., St. Louis carriers, National Register of Historic Broadway, Columbus, 05000794 (Indpendent City), 05000812 Places, National Park Service, 1201 Eye Tarver, C.B., Building, (Columbus MRA) 18– St.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 70, No. 141/Monday, July 25, 2005/Notices
    Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 141 / Monday, July 25, 2005 / Notices 42587 MPS) OR Coast 9, U.S. 101, MO127.61, Windham County Russell Family Historic District, 35, 65, 85 N. Depoe Bay, 05000823 Butterfield House, 204 Main St., Grafton, Central, 228, 334 Robin Hill, 101 Rocky Creek Bridge No. 01089, (McCullough, 05000806 Russwood, Alexandria, 05000839 C.B., Major Oregon Coast Highway Bridges Grafton Post Office, 205 Main St., Grafton, South Central Historic District, Bounded by MPS) Otter Crest Loop Rd., U.S. 101 05000807 Broad St., Tallpoosa St., Cherokee Rd., frontage road, MP F130.00, Otter Rock, Bishop St., Franklin St., Willow St., 05000824 [FR Doc. 05–14549 Filed 7–22–05; 8:45 am] Alexander City, 05000840 Yaquina Bay Bridge No. 01820, (McCullough, BILLING CODE 4312–51–P CALIFORNIA C.B., Major Oregon Coast Highway Bridges MPS) OR Coast 9, U.S. 101, MP141.67, San Bernardino County Newport, 05000821 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Euclid Avenue, From 24th St. in Upland to Philadelphia St. in Ontario, Upland and Multnomah County National Park Service Ontario, 05000843 Hiberian Hall, (Eliot Neighborhood MPS) 128 COLORADO NE Russell, Portland, 05000826 National Register of Historic Places; Malarkey, Herbert and Elizabeth, House, Notification of Pending Nominations Chaffee County 1717 SW Elm St., Portland, 05000827 and Related Actions Hutchinson Ranch (Boundary Increase), 8911 Northwest Fence and Wire Works, 400 NE W U.S. 50, Salida, 05000847 11th Ave., Portland, 05000828 Nominations for the following FLORIDA Tillamook County properties being considered for listing Manatee County Wilson River Bridge No. 01499, or related actions in the National Jordan, Rufus P., House, 760 Broadway St., (McCullough, C.B., Major Oregon Coast Register were received by the National Longboat Key, 05000844 Highway Bridges MPS) OR Coast 9, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • ROUTE 1 NOTTOWAY RIVER BRIDGE HAER No. VA-120 U.S. Route 1 Spanning Not Toway River Mckenney Vicinity Dinwiddie County HP\ER Virginia V£V I
    ROUTE 1 NOTTOWAY RIVER BRIDGE HAER No. VA-120 U.S. Route 1 spanning Not toway River McKenney Vicinity Dinwiddie County HP\ER Virginia V£V i PHOTOGRAPHS WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD National Park Service Philadelphia Support Office U.S. Custom House 200 Chestnut Street Philadelphia, PA 19106 ta HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD ROUTE 1 NOTTOWAY RIVER BRIDGE HAER NO. VA-120 LOCATION: U.S. Route 1 spanning Nottoway River, McKenney vicinity, Dinwiddie county, Virginia. USGS McKenney, VA Quadrangle UTM Coordinates: 18.256550.4092120 DATE OF CONSTRUCTION: 1927 BUILDER: Virginia State Highway Department, William P. Glidden, bridge engineer; Hagedorn Construction Company, contractor. PRESENT OWNER: Virginia Department of Transportation PRESENT USE: Highway bridge SIGNIFICANCE: The Route 1 Nottoway River Bridge is an example of a short-span concrete through-arch highway bridge of the extremely rare tied-arch type. The bridge was part of the final construction project completing the realignment and concrete paving of Route 1 from Washington, D.C., through Virginia to Raleigh, North Carolina, an important event in national and state transportation history. PROJECT INFORMATION: The Route 1 Nottoway River Bridge was recorded in October 1996 by the Cultural Resource Group of Louis Berger & Associates, Inc., Richmond, Virginia, for the Virginia Department of Transportation. The recordation was undertaken pursuant to a Memorandum of Agreement between the Virginia State Historic Preservation Officer and the Virginia Department of Transportation. Project personnel included Richard M. Casella, Senior Architectural Historian; Philip E. Pendleton, Architectural Historian; and Rob Tucher, Senior Photographer. ROUTE 1 NOTTOWAY RIVER BRIDGE HAER No.
    [Show full text]
  • BA? ^ National Register of Historic Places / /^^{^Dpo ^- Registration Form / / JUN ^^Sf^O
    NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 00.SC, ^ United States Department of the Interior National Park Service /^^^/?^BA? _^ National Register of Historic Places / /^^{^Dpo ^- Registration Form / / JUN ^^Sf^O This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts/ &9i i^Ernetians in HdfeMU£onfplete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item^Jig^aj^ifla WjjjSc^acgropriatB box or by entering the information requested. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" {(^^i'^^t^^^^f^^^/^^^^^ classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instmctions. Place S^^waYlgp^ies and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. ' 1. Name of Property_________________________________ historic name Wilson River Bridge No. 01499 other names/site number Wilson River Bridge at Tillamook 2. Location street & number Oregon Coast Highway No. 9 (US 101). MP 64.23 not for publication _ city or town Tillamook______________ vicinity X state Oregon__________ code OR county Tillamook_______ code 057 zip code 97141____ 3. State/Federal/Tribal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this E3 nomination D request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property EEJ meets D does not meet the National Register Criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • The Foreign Service Journal, January 1945
    g/,c AMERICAN FOREIGN SERVICE JOURNAL JANUARY 1945 THANK YOU FOR YOUR PATRONAGEf The popularity of American products in many world markets may at least in part be attributed to the wholehearted cooperation of America’s diplomatic and consular representatives abroad. This reflects not only conscious effort on their part, but the great power of their example. Schenley appreciates your patronage of its products—not merely because your prestige impresses our foreign prospects and customers and means better business for us, but also because we are genuinely proud to serve the distinguished group of men and women to which you belong. We would like to call your particular attention to Schenley Reserve —a true American whiskey of the finest quality. Schenley International Corporation Empire State Building • New York City CONTENTS JANUARY, 1945 They ull Cover: The Honorable Edward R. Stettin ins, Jr., Secretary of State GO DOUGLAS Foreign Service Planning 7 By Mon nett B. Davis GLIDER TROOPS and combat cargo Mr. Crew’s Visit to Pearl Harbor—photos 11 all “Go Douglas.” Wherever and when¬ ever Allied strategy calls for the use of Before the Joint Survey Group 12 By Senator Joseph H. Ball gliders they are towed by Douglas trans¬ ports. Letters to the Editors 14 “JOHNNY SKYTROOPER” goes Doug¬ las, too. Transporting U. S. Paratroop¬ Message to the Foreign Service 15 ers into action swiftly and safely on Changes in the Editorial Board 16 every front is a 100% Douglas responsi¬ bility. Prize Essay Contest 17 AIRBORNE CARGO destined for every theater of war also goes Douglas.
    [Show full text]