Federal Register/Vol. 70, No. 141/Monday, July 25, 2005/Notices
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
La Historia Detrás De La Pared De Piedra
21 al 27 de septiembre del 2014 • www.laprensalatina.com Variedades • Entertainment 15 Cementerio y Funeraria Memorial Park… La Gruta del La historia detrás de la pared de piedra Santuario Memorial Park Funeral Home and Cemetery… The Story Behind the Stone Wall de Cristal The Crystal Shrine Grotto MEMPHIS, TN (LPL) --- La Gruta del Santuario de Cristal es la úni- ca cueva en el mundo hecha por el hombre y está situada en el interior del Cementerio “Memorial Park” en Memphis, TN. El artista y arquitecto Dionisio Rodríguez diseñó y creó la cueva a lo largo de diez años, a partir de 1938. Dionisio Rodríguez (1891-1955) de Toluca, México, fue un artista muy popular por su estilo único de transformar el cemento (concreto) en fantásticas obras de arte, que en realidad parecían ser esculpidas en madera; su técnica era conocida como Faux Bois (madera falsa en francés). Las puertas, los bancos y las formaciones de rocas artificiales fueron creadas por el artista para in- vitar a los visitantes a descansar o explorar el paisaje. Rodríguez calificaba su trabajo como “el método rústico”. Dentro de la gruta hay diez esce- nas que representan la vida de Jesu- cristo. Estas escenas fueron realiza- das con una técnica mixta de pintura y escultura. La cueva ofrece un ambiente tranquilo, tanto que quienes la visi- tan sienten una gran paz y aprecian su belleza y valor artístico. Las esculturas de Rodríguez y el Santuario de la Gruta de Cristal en el Cementerio Memorial Park están incluidas en el Registro Nacional de Lugares Históricos. -
I Sculpture by Dionicio Rodriguez in Texas
NFS Form 10-900-b OMB No. 1024-0018 (March 1992) R _, , United States Department of the Interior { \ National Park Service iI • NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES 1 1 f MULTIPLE PROPERTY DOCUMENTATION FORM \ I 1 ' ' - ; '^v '- This form is used for documenting multiple property groups relating to one oc^several historic contexts. See instructions in How to Complete the Multiple Property Documentation Form (National Register Bulletin 16B). Complete each item by entering the requested information. For additional space, use continuation sheets (Form 10-900-a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer to complete all items. X New Submission Amended Submission A. NAME OF MULTIPLE PROPERTY LISTING Sculpture by Dionicio Rodriguez in Texas B. ASSOCIATED HISTORIC CONTEXTS The Sculpture of Dionicio Rodriguez in Texas C. FORM PREPARED BY Name/Title: Patsy Light, with Maria Pfeiffer (with assistance from Gregory W. Smith, Texas Historical Commission) Address: 300 Argyle Telephone: (210) 824-5914 City/Town: San Antonio, Texas State: Texas Zip Code: 78209 D. CERTIFICATION As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this documentation form meets the National Register documentation standards and sets forth requirements for the listing of related properties consistent with the National Register criteria. This submission meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 6j>3n7J the Secretary of the Interior's Standards and Guidelines for Archeology and Historic Preservation. (__ See contj^tjation sheet for additional comments.) Signature and title of certifying o'KLdal (SHPO, Texas Historical Commission) Date I hereby certify that this multiple property documentation form has been approved by the National Register as a basis for evaluating related properties for listing in the National Register. -
National Register of Historic Places Registration Form
(Oct. 1990) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES REGISTRATION FORM 1. NAME OF PROPERTY HISTORIC NAME: Chinese Sunken Garden Gate OTHER NAME/SITE NUMBER: Japanese Sunken Garden Gate 2. LOCATION STREET & NUMBER: Brackenridge Park, 400 N. St. Mary’s Street NOT FOR PUBLICATION: N/A CITY OR TOWN: San Antonio VICINITY: N/A STATE: Texas CODE: TX COUNTY: Bexar CODE: 029 ZIP CODE: 78205 3. STATE/FEDERAL AGENCY CERTIFICATION As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this ( x nomination) (__ request for determination of eligibility) meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property ( x meets) ( _ does not meet) the National Register criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant ( _ nationally) ( _ statewide) ( _x_ locally). ( __ See continuation sheet for additional comments.) _______________________________________________________________________ ___ __________________________ Signature of certifying official Date State Historic Preservation Officer, Texas Historical Commission ___ ___ State or Federal agency and bureau In my opinion, the property ___meets ___does not meet the National Register criteria. ( __ See continuation sheet for additional comments.) ___________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________ -
POTB Strategic Business Plan
PORT OF TILLAMOOK BAY Strategic Business Plan Port of Tillamook Bay 4000 Blimp Boulevard Tillamook, OR 97141 December, 2009 Submitted by: The Benkendorf Associates Corp. 909 SW St. Clair Ave, Suite 9 Portland, Oregon 97205 Johnson Reid, LLC Allan E. Rumbaugh 319 SW Washington Street, Suite 1020 10500 SW Naeve Street Portland, Oregon 97204 Tigard, Oregon 97224 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. HISTORY & MISSION ........................................................................... 1 A. HISTORY ..................................................................................... 1 B. PORT ENABLING STATUTES ........................................................... 1 C. EXISTING MISSION ........................................................................ 2 D. STRATEGIC PLAN PROCESS .......................................................... 3 II. PORT DESCRIPTION ........................................................................... 4 A. FACILITIES AND PROPERTY ............................................................ 4 B. OPERATIONS ................................................................................ 5 C. POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ......................................................... 7 D. FINANCIAL CONDITION ................................................................ 11 III. MARKET AND TRENDS .................................................................... 21 A. NATIONAL TRENDS ..................................................................... 21 B. REGIONAL & LOCAL TRENDS ...................................................... -
United States Department of the Interior NATIONAL REGISTER OF
N'PS Form 10-900a OMB No. 1024-0018 (8-86) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES CONTINUATION SHEET Section ___ Page __ SUPPLEMENTARY LISTING RECORD NRIS Reference Number: 08001138 Date Listed: 11/25/2008 Gate, Fence and Hollow Tree Shelter Designed by Dionicio Rodriguez Union NM Property Name County State N/A Multiple Name This property is listed in the National Register of Historic Places in accordance with the attached nomination documentation subject to the following exceptions, exclusions, or amendments, notwithstanding the National Park Service certification included in the nomination documentation. / Signatureyof the Keeper DaiDate of Action Amended/Items in Nomination: Historic Resource Name: For purposes of the National Register Information System the title of the property is amended to read: Gate, Fence and Hollow Tree Shelter Designed by Dionicio Rodriguez Classification: The Category of Property is amended to read: Structure. [The Category and Resource Count terminology should be consistent. As works of art, "object" might be an equally valid term, but the size and scale of the works appear better suited to use of the term "structure."] Function: The Historic and Current Functions are amended to add: Recreation/Culture-Work of Art [This is consistent with the terminology used for similar resources in Texas. While the works had a utilitarian purpose as yard landscape features, they also represented the conscious choice of the property owner to incorporate a clear aesthetic/artistic statement into his property.] These clarifications were confirmed with the NM SHPO office. DISTRIBUTION: National Register property file Nominating Authority (without nomination attachment) (Oct. -
Conde Mccullough
Conde McCullough Conde Balcom McCullough (May 30, 1887 – May 5, 1946) Conde McCullough was a U.S. bridge engineer who is primarily known for designing many of Oregon's coastal bridges on U.S. Route 101.[1] The native of South Dakota worked for the Oregon Department of Transportation from 1919 to 1935 and 1937 until 1946. McCullough also was a professor at Oregon State University. Early life Conde McCullough was born in Redfield, South Dakota, on May 30, 1887.[2] In 1891, he and his family moved to Iowa where his father died in 1904.[2] McCullough then worked at various jobs to May 30, 1887 [2] Born support the family. In 1910, he graduated from Iowa State Redfield, South Dakota, U.S. [3] May 5, 1946 (aged 58) University with a civil engineering degree. Died Oregon Career Nationality American Isaac Lee Patterson Bridge Buildings Yaquina Bay Bridge McCullough began working for the Marsh Bridge Company in Des Alsea Bay Bridge Moines, Iowa, where he remained for one year.[2] He then went to work for the Iowa State Highway Commission.[2] Conde moved to Oregon in 1916 and became an assistant professor of civil engineering at Oregon Agricultural College, and the sole structural engineering professor at the school.[2] In 1919 he became the head of the Bridge Division of the Oregon Department of Transportation, making him personally responsible for the design of Oregon's bridges at a time when the state was completing Highway 101. His designs are well known for their architectural beauty.[4] McCullough advocated that bridges be built economically, efficiently, and with beauty.[1] He helped design over 600 bridges, many with architectural details such as Gothic spires, art deco obelisks, and Romanesque arches incorporated into the bridges.[5] In 1928, he graduated from Willamette University College of Law and passed the bar the same year.[6] In 1935 he moved to San José, Costa Rica to help design bridges on the Pan-American Highway. -
Hispanic Texans
texas historical commission Hispanic texans Journey from e mpire to Democracy a GuiDe for h eritaGe travelers Hispanic, spanisH, spanisH american, mexican, mexican american, mexicano, Latino, Chicano, tejano— all have been valid terms for Texans who traced their roots to the Iberian Peninsula or Mexico. In the last 50 years, cultural identity has become even more complicated. The arrival of Cubans in the early 1960s, Puerto Ricans in the 1970s, and Central Americans in the 1980s has made for increasing diversity of the state’s Hispanic, or Latino, population. However, the Mexican branch of the Hispanic family, combining Native, European, and African elements, has left the deepest imprint on the Lone Star State. The state’s name—pronounced Tay-hahs in Spanish— derives from the old Spanish spelling of a Caddo word for friend. Since the state was named Tejas by the Spaniards, it’s not surprising that many of its most important geographic features and locations also have Spanish names. Major Texas waterways from the Sabine River to the Rio Grande were named, or renamed, by Spanish explorers and Franciscan missionaries. Although the story of Texas stretches back millennia into prehistory, its history begins with the arrival of Spanish in the last 50 years, conquistadors in the early 16th cultural identity century. Cabeza de Vaca and his has become even companions in the 1520s and more complicated. 1530s were followed by the expeditions of Coronado and De Soto in the early 1540s. In 1598, Juan de Oñate, on his way to conquer the Pueblo Indians of New Mexico, crossed the Rio Grande in the El Paso area. -
Hood River Bridge Replacement Environmental Studies, Design and Permit Assistance APRIL 25, 2018 April 25, 2018
CONSULTANT SERVICES FOR Hood River Bridge Replacement Environmental Studies, Design and Permit Assistance APRIL 25, 2018 April 25, 2018 ATTN: Dale Robins Southwest Washington Regional Transportation Council (RTC) 1300 Franklin Street, 4th Floor Vancouver, Washington 98660 Re: Response to RFP Consultant Services for Hood River Bridge Replacement Environmental Studies, Design and Permit Assistance Dear Mr. Dale Robins and Selection Committee, For nearly 95 years, travelers have crossed the Columbia River using the Hood River Bridge, which connects Hood River, Oregon and the communities of White Salmon and Bingen in Washington state. While the travelers are diverse - farmer, hiker, trucker, tugboat operator, windsurfer - their need is the same: a safe, reliable connection between Oregon and Washington. Today, the Hood River Bridge is failing to meet modern transportation demands: deteriorating bridge members, combined with dimensional and weight restrictions for trucks, hamper the structure’s effectiveness and, quite possibly, the regional economy. The replacement of the bridge is a critical transportation improvement needed to support the interstate travel of motorized vehicles, pedestrians and bicyclists, and marine freight transport, which have significant local and regional economic and quality of life benefits. In 1999, a campaign to replace the existing bridge began, which then culminated into the 2003 Draft EIS, which was completed by Parsons Brinkerhoff now WSP. Following the Draft EIS, the firm conducted a Bridge TS&L study. From -
BIG CREEK BRIDGE HAER No. OR-86 Oregon Coast Highway (U.S
BIG CREEK BRIDGE HAER No. OR-86 Oregon Coast Highway (U.S. 101), spanning Big Creek Florence Vicinity Lane County Oregon PHOTOGRAPHS WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD National Park Service Western Region Department of the Interior San Francisco, California 94107 HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD BIG CREEK BRIDGE HAER No. OR-86 Location: Spanning Big Creek on the Oregon Coast Highway, US 101 (M.P. 175.02), approx. 15 miles north of Florence, Lane County, Oregon. USGS Heceta Head Quadrangle UTM Coordinates: 10.410665.489160 Date of Construction: 1931 Engineer: Conde B. McCullough. Oregon State Bridge Engineer Builders: Union Bridge Company, under a cooperative agreement with: Oregon State Highway Commission, Lane County, and the U.S. Bureau of Public Roads Present Owner: Oregon Department of Transportation Present Use: Highway Bridge Significance: The Big Creek Bridge is significant as one of the earliest examples ofreinforced concrete tied-arch bridge construction in the Pacific Northwest region of the United States. The Big Creek Bridge is also significant as the work of a master, Oregon State Bridge Engineer, Conde B. McCullough, and due to its thematic association with the design and construction of several other major reinforced concrete bridges designed by McCullough and erected along the Oregon Coast Highway in the 1930s. Conde Balcom McCullough served as State Bridge Engineer, and later as the Assistant State Highway Engineer for Oregon from 1919 until his death in 1946. McCullough is significant for his use of innovative bridge technology, and for his visually appealing designs. He has attained international recognition for the large-scale structures he designed to span the major rivers and estuaries along the Oregon coast for the completion of the Oregon Coast Highway in the 1930s. -
A Context for Common Historic Bridge Types
A Context For Common Historic Bridge Types NCHRP Project 25-25, Task 15 Prepared for The National Cooperative Highway Research Program Transportation Research Council National Research Council Prepared By Parsons Brinckerhoff and Engineering and Industrial Heritage October 2005 NCHRP Project 25-25, Task 15 A Context For Common Historic Bridge Types TRANSPORATION RESEARCH BOARD NAS-NRC PRIVILEGED DOCUMENT This report, not released for publication, is furnished for review to members or participants in the work of the National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP). It is to be regarded as fully privileged, and dissemination of the information included herein must be approved by the NCHRP. Prepared for The National Cooperative Highway Research Program Transportation Research Council National Research Council Prepared By Parsons Brinckerhoff and Engineering and Industrial Heritage October 2005 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF SPONSORSHIP This work was sponsored by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials in cooperation with the Federal Highway Administration, and was conducted in the National Cooperative Highway Research Program, which is administered by the Transportation Research Board of the National Research Council. DISCLAIMER The opinions and conclusions expressed or implied in the report are those of the research team. They are not necessarily those of the Transportation Research Board, the National Research Council, the Federal Highway Administration, the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, or the individual states participating in the National Cooperative Highway Research Program. i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The research reported herein was performed under NCHRP Project 25-25, Task 15, by Parsons Brinckerhoff and Engineering and Industrial Heritage. Margaret Slater, AICP, of Parsons Brinckerhoff (PB) was principal investigator for this project and led the preparation of the report. -
Pulaski County Historical Review Table of Contents Historical Listing
Pulaski County Historical Review Table of Contents Historical Listing The Pulaski County Historical Review began publication in 1953, two years after the Society was organized, making the Society and the Review one of the oldest county historical organizations and publications in the state. Over the years, the Review has been honored many times for its contents. This compilation of the journal’s table of contents since issue one was begun and compiled by UALR Professor John Kirk’s inaugural “History of Race and Ethnicity” class, a part of the Race and Ethnicity minor at the University of Arkansas at Little Rock and was edited by Sarah Riva, a graduate student in UALR’s Public History program. Citations are listed by year, volume, issue. The Society has kept this listing up to date at the end of the publishing year following UALR’s initial effort. 1953. 1. 1. (June) “Albert Pike Home to be Open to the Public.” Pulaski County Historical Review 1 (June 1953): 1. “Markers and Monuments in Pulaski County.” Pulaski County Historical Review 1 (June 1953): 2. Witter, Daniel. “Reminiscences of Little Rock in 1820.” Pulaski County Historical Review 1 (June 1953): 3-6. “Little Rock’s First Hewed Log House.” Pulaski County Historical Review 1 (June 1953):7. “Eyewitness Account of Newton-Sevier Duel.” Pulaski County Historical Review 1 (June 1953): 8-9. “Arkansas Historical Association Holds Annual Meeting.” Pulaski County Historical Review 1 (June 1953): 10. Ross, Margaret Smith. “The Cunninghams: Little Rock’s First Family.” Pulaski County Historical Review 1 (June 1953): 11-15. “The Good Old Days.” Pulaski County Historical Review 1 (June 1953): 16. -
7. Gulph Creek Stone Arch Bridge (1789), Spanning Gulph Creek at Old Gulph Road, Upper Merion, Montgomery County, PA
Chapter 3—Historic Context for Common Historic Bridge Types 7. Gulph Creek Stone Arch Bridge (1789), spanning Gulph Creek at Old Gulph Road, Upper Merion, Montgomery County, PA. HAER PA-309. 8. Possum Kingdom Stone Arch Bridge (1940-42), spanning Brazos River at State Route 16, Graford, Palo Pinto County, TX HAER TX-62. Figures 3-42 through 3-46 depict a drawing and examples of stone arch structures. Figure 3-42. Elevation drawing of stone arch bridge. Keystone Figure 3-43. Gulph Creek Stone Arch Bridge (1789), Old Gulph Road, Upper Merion, Montgomery County, Pennsylvania. This eighteenth century stone arch bridge is one of the oldest surviving bridges in Pennsylvania. Figure 44. “S" Bridge (first quarter nineteenth century), West of Cambridge, Ohio. This 1933 photograph shows an “S” Bridge on the Old National Road. 3-51 Chapter 3—Historic Context for Common Historic Bridge Types Figure 3-45. Cabin John Aqueduct Bridge (1864), MacArthur Boulevard, spanning Cabin John Creek at Cabin John, Maryland. With a single arch span of 220 feet, this bridge was the longest masonry arch bridge in the world until 1905. Figure 3-46. Possum Kingdom Stone Arch Bridge (1940-42), spanning Brazos River at State Route 16, Graford, Texas. This structure is an example of a Works Progress Administration-built stone arch bridge. 3-52 Chapter 3—Historic Context for Common Historic Bridge Types 3.2.2 Reinforced Concrete Melan/von Emperger/Thacher Arch History and Description: The first concrete arch bridge in the United States was a plain, un-reinforced concrete footbridge with a 31-foot span, constructed in Prospect Park, Brooklyn, New York, in 1871.