DOCSLIB.ORG

June 2019 Tsp Final Volume 2 Appendix

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
June 2019 Tsp Final Volume 2 Appendix Tillamook Transportation System Plan Update Volume 2: Appendix June 2019 City of Tillamook Transportation System Plan This page intentionally left blank. Appendices Appendix A: Public Involvement Plan Appendix B: Background Plans and Policies Review Appendix C: Regulatory Review Appendix D: Goals, Objectives, and Evaluation Criteria Appendix E: Existing Conditions Appendix F: Future Conditions Appendix G: Future Needs Appendix H: Solutions Evaluation Appendix I: Finance Program Appendix J: Transportation Standards Appendix K: US-101 Pedestrian Crossings Study City of Tillamook Transportation System Plan This page intentionally left blank. Appendix A Public Involvement Plan City of Tillamook Transportation System Plan This page intentionally left blank. TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM Technical Memorandum #1: Public and Stakeholder Involvement Plan (v.2) PREPARED FOR: City of Tillamook Staff Ken Shonkwiler, ODOT COPY TO: Kristin Hull, CH2M Ryan Farncomb, CH2M PREPARED BY: Kate Drennan, CH2M DATE: March 16, 2017 This memo describes the proposed public and stakeholder involvement plan to support the Tillamook Transportation System Plan (TSP) update. The TSP represents the City’s vision for its transportation system. The TSP update will review existing projects and policies, and identify new projects and policies that will improve safety, mobility, and access for all users of the system. The plan will strive to support planned economic, commercial and residential growth. The project will ensure consistency between the Tillamook TSP and local and state policies, plans, and rules (including the Transportation Planning Rule). This public involvement plan describes the public involvement goals and decision making process. It includes key messaging statements to assist the project team when discussing the project with the media or the public. Finally, it details outreach activities with assignments of responsibility and timelines for completion. This public involvement plan may be updated during the project to reflect changes in approaches or the project schedule. Overview The project schedule below outlines the timeline for technical work and public outreach processes for the project, which is expected to be completed by September 2018. The City, along with ODOT and the consultant team, will provide public involvement opportunities throughout the project, with a focus on key milestones. A-1 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM #1: PUBLIC AND STAKEHOLDER INVOLVEMENT PLAN (V.2) Public and Stakeholder Involvement Goals The City of Tillamook and Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) are committed to an approach that: • Provides early and ongoing opportunities for stakeholders to raise issues and concerns that can be considered through equitable and constructive two-way communication between the project team and the public. • Encourages the participation of all stakeholders regardless of race, ethnicity, age, disability, income, or primary language by offering alternative accommodations (e.g. translation services, transportation). • Promotes fair treatment so that no group of people (racial, ethnic, or a socioeconomic group) bears a disproportionate share of the negative environmental consequences resulting from a program or policy. • Ensures that public contributions are considered in the decision making process and can influence the development of the TSP. This public involvement plan helps achieve these goals. The plan includes specific steps to provide opportunities for participation by federal Title VI communities. The City and CH2M will utilize the ODOT Title VI (1964 Civil Rights Act) Plan guidance to identify Title VI populations, formulate public involvement strategies, and report outreach efforts to and participation by Title VI communities. Decision Making In all public communications, it is important to be clear on who is making decisions for the project and how public comments will be used. At each step, stakeholders should clearly understand: • Who will make the decisions? • How they can influence the decisions • When they will have an opportunity to participate • How their input will be considered A-2 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM #1: PUBLIC AND STAKEHOLDER INVOLVEMENT PLAN (V.2) The project decision structure includes the Tillamook City Council, Tillamook Planning Commission, Project Management Team and Project Advisory Committee. The project decision making structure is shown in Figure 1 and is described below. Tillamook City Council Decide Tillamook Planning Commission Recommend Project Management Team Public Input Advise Project Advisory Committee Advise Figure 1. Decision-making structure Decide: Tillamook City Council The Tillamook City Council will adopt the final TSP. Recommend: Tillamook Planning Commission The Tillamook Planning Commission will make a recommendation to City Council on a final TSP and will provide direction to City staff throughout the development of the TSP. Advise: Project Management Team and Project Advisory Committee (PAC) The Project Management Team, comprised of staff from the City of Tillamook, ODOT, and the consultant team will make recommendations to the Planning Commission and City Council. The Project Management Team will consider Project Advisory Committee (PAC) input in developing their recommendation. The Project Management Team will also provide day-to-day guidance to the project manager and consultant team to ensure coordination with related planning efforts. The PAC will synthesize public input, provide feedback and make recommendations to the Project Management Team on at key milestones throughout the project. Target Audiences/Stakeholders Stakeholders for this project include the City of Tillamook, transportation interests, neighborhood and business interests, media, emergency service providers, and the traveling public. A-3 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM #1: PUBLIC AND STAKEHOLDER INVOLVEMENT PLAN (V.2) Target Audiences/Groups Stakeholder Category Examples Government agencies and Tillamook City Council, Tillamook Planning Commission, Tillamook Public institutions Works Committee, Tillamook Associations Committee, Tillamook County, ODOT, Confederated Tribes of Siletz Indians, Confederated Tribes of the Grand Ronde, Clatsop-Nehalem Confederated Tribes, Department of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD) Utilities Tillamook PUD, Charter Cable, Verizon Schools and Youth Tillamook School District #9 , Tillamook Bay Community College, Tillamook County YMCA Transportation stakeholders Greyhound bus, Port of Tillamook Bay, Amtrak (bus), Tillamook County Transit, Tillamook Airport, Oregon Coast Scenic Railroad Advocacy groups Tillamook Estuaries Partnership, Street Trust (formerly the Bicycle Transportation Alliance) Employers and businesses Tillamook Area Chamber of Commerce, Downtown Business representatives, Tillamook County Creamery Association, Tillamook County Farm Bureau, Freight (e.g. Averill Trucking, Hampton Lumber, Jenck Farms), Downtown Revitalization Association, Tillamook Regional Medical Center, City Sanitary Emergency service providers Tillamook Police, Fire and Rescue Media Headlight Herald, Tillamook County Pioneer, Coast River Business Journal, KTCB and KTMK Tillamook public radio stations Low-income, minority, and Tillamook Head Start, Northwest Oregon Housing Authority, Northwest Senior limited English proficient & Disability Services, Tillamook County Women’s Resource Center, Oregon (LEP) communities Food Bank – Tillamook County Services, CARE Environmental Justice Outreach and Title VI Compliance The project team conducted a review of area demographics to inform the development of outreach strategies to reach low-income, minority, and limited-English proficient residents. The City will conduct targeted activities to reach these groups and will make accommodations (e.g. translation services) to encourage their participation. To engage these communities, the project team will employ the following strategies: • Project Advisory Committee (PAC) meetings: include members from organizations that advocate for or serve low-income, minority or limited-English proficient residents. • Community events: identify partner organizations that can co-host or promote community events to traditionally underserved communities. Collect demographic information (anonymously) at all public events to be added to the final report. • Translation or special accommodations: translation services and other special accommodations will be provided at all meetings upon request. Table 2 provides demographic information from the American Community Survey from 2011-2015 for the City of Tillamook and the state of Oregon to facilitate comparisons. A-4 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM #1: PUBLIC AND STAKEHOLDER INVOLVEMENT PLAN (V.2) Population Demographics by Location SUBJECT TILLAMOOK CITY OREGON Total Population 4,958 3,939,233 Median Age 35 39 Population Under 18 Years 25% 22% Population Over 65 Years 14% 15% 1 African American 0.0% 2% American Indian And Alaska Native 0.8% 1% Asian American 0.6% 4% Caucasian 87% 85% Native Hawaiian And Other Pacific Islander 1% 0.4% Two Or More Races 5% 4% Hispanic Or Latino (Of Any Race) 11% 12% Median Household Income $29,889 $51,243 All People Living Below The Poverty Level In Last Year 32% 16.5% People Over 16 Unemployed 9% 9% Households With Food Stamp/Snap Benefits In Last Year 38% 19% Speak A Language Other Than English At Home 10% 15% Of Which, % That Are Fluent English Speakers 72% 60% Of Which, % That Are Non-Fluent English Speakers 28% 40% Notable differences between Tillamook and the state include:
Load more

Recommended publications
  • POTB Strategic Business Plan
    PORT OF TILLAMOOK BAY Strategic Business Plan Port of Tillamook Bay 4000 Blimp Boulevard Tillamook, OR 97141 December, 2009 Submitted by: The Benkendorf Associates Corp. 909 SW St. Clair Ave, Suite 9 Portland, Oregon 97205 Johnson Reid, LLC Allan E. Rumbaugh 319 SW Washington Street, Suite 1020 10500 SW Naeve Street Portland, Oregon 97204 Tigard, Oregon 97224 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. HISTORY & MISSION ........................................................................... 1 A. HISTORY ..................................................................................... 1 B. PORT ENABLING STATUTES ........................................................... 1 C. EXISTING MISSION ........................................................................ 2 D. STRATEGIC PLAN PROCESS .......................................................... 3 II. PORT DESCRIPTION ........................................................................... 4 A. FACILITIES AND PROPERTY ............................................................ 4 B. OPERATIONS ................................................................................ 5 C. POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ......................................................... 7 D. FINANCIAL CONDITION ................................................................ 11 III. MARKET AND TRENDS .................................................................... 21 A. NATIONAL TRENDS ..................................................................... 21 B. REGIONAL & LOCAL TRENDS ......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Conde Mccullough
    Conde McCullough Conde Balcom McCullough (May 30, 1887 – May 5, 1946) Conde McCullough was a U.S. bridge engineer who is primarily known for designing many of Oregon's coastal bridges on U.S. Route 101.[1] The native of South Dakota worked for the Oregon Department of Transportation from 1919 to 1935 and 1937 until 1946. McCullough also was a professor at Oregon State University. Early life Conde McCullough was born in Redfield, South Dakota, on May 30, 1887.[2] In 1891, he and his family moved to Iowa where his father died in 1904.[2] McCullough then worked at various jobs to May 30, 1887 [2] Born support the family. In 1910, he graduated from Iowa State Redfield, South Dakota, U.S. [3] May 5, 1946 (aged 58) University with a civil engineering degree. Died Oregon Career Nationality American Isaac Lee Patterson Bridge Buildings Yaquina Bay Bridge McCullough began working for the Marsh Bridge Company in Des Alsea Bay Bridge Moines, Iowa, where he remained for one year.[2] He then went to work for the Iowa State Highway Commission.[2] Conde moved to Oregon in 1916 and became an assistant professor of civil engineering at Oregon Agricultural College, and the sole structural engineering professor at the school.[2] In 1919 he became the head of the Bridge Division of the Oregon Department of Transportation, making him personally responsible for the design of Oregon's bridges at a time when the state was completing Highway 101. His designs are well known for their architectural beauty.[4] McCullough advocated that bridges be built economically, efficiently, and with beauty.[1] He helped design over 600 bridges, many with architectural details such as Gothic spires, art deco obelisks, and Romanesque arches incorporated into the bridges.[5] In 1928, he graduated from Willamette University College of Law and passed the bar the same year.[6] In 1935 he moved to San José, Costa Rica to help design bridges on the Pan-American Highway.
    [Show full text]
  • Hood River Bridge Replacement Environmental Studies, Design and Permit Assistance APRIL 25, 2018 April 25, 2018
    CONSULTANT SERVICES FOR Hood River Bridge Replacement Environmental Studies, Design and Permit Assistance APRIL 25, 2018 April 25, 2018 ATTN: Dale Robins Southwest Washington Regional Transportation Council (RTC) 1300 Franklin Street, 4th Floor Vancouver, Washington 98660 Re: Response to RFP Consultant Services for Hood River Bridge Replacement Environmental Studies, Design and Permit Assistance Dear Mr. Dale Robins and Selection Committee, For nearly 95 years, travelers have crossed the Columbia River using the Hood River Bridge, which connects Hood River, Oregon and the communities of White Salmon and Bingen in Washington state. While the travelers are diverse - farmer, hiker, trucker, tugboat operator, windsurfer - their need is the same: a safe, reliable connection between Oregon and Washington. Today, the Hood River Bridge is failing to meet modern transportation demands: deteriorating bridge members, combined with dimensional and weight restrictions for trucks, hamper the structure’s effectiveness and, quite possibly, the regional economy. The replacement of the bridge is a critical transportation improvement needed to support the interstate travel of motorized vehicles, pedestrians and bicyclists, and marine freight transport, which have significant local and regional economic and quality of life benefits. In 1999, a campaign to replace the existing bridge began, which then culminated into the 2003 Draft EIS, which was completed by Parsons Brinkerhoff now WSP. Following the Draft EIS, the firm conducted a Bridge TS&L study. From
    [Show full text]
  • BIG CREEK BRIDGE HAER No. OR-86 Oregon Coast Highway (U.S
    BIG CREEK BRIDGE HAER No. OR-86 Oregon Coast Highway (U.S. 101), spanning Big Creek Florence Vicinity Lane County Oregon PHOTOGRAPHS WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD National Park Service Western Region Department of the Interior San Francisco, California 94107 HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD BIG CREEK BRIDGE HAER No. OR-86 Location: Spanning Big Creek on the Oregon Coast Highway, US 101 (M.P. 175.02), approx. 15 miles north of Florence, Lane County, Oregon. USGS Heceta Head Quadrangle UTM Coordinates: 10.410665.489160 Date of Construction: 1931 Engineer: Conde B. McCullough. Oregon State Bridge Engineer Builders: Union Bridge Company, under a cooperative agreement with: Oregon State Highway Commission, Lane County, and the U.S. Bureau of Public Roads Present Owner: Oregon Department of Transportation Present Use: Highway Bridge Significance: The Big Creek Bridge is significant as one of the earliest examples ofreinforced concrete tied-arch bridge construction in the Pacific Northwest region of the United States. The Big Creek Bridge is also significant as the work of a master, Oregon State Bridge Engineer, Conde B. McCullough, and due to its thematic association with the design and construction of several other major reinforced concrete bridges designed by McCullough and erected along the Oregon Coast Highway in the 1930s. Conde Balcom McCullough served as State Bridge Engineer, and later as the Assistant State Highway Engineer for Oregon from 1919 until his death in 1946. McCullough is significant for his use of innovative bridge technology, and for his visually appealing designs. He has attained international recognition for the large-scale structures he designed to span the major rivers and estuaries along the Oregon coast for the completion of the Oregon Coast Highway in the 1930s.
    [Show full text]
  • A Context for Common Historic Bridge Types
    A Context For Common Historic Bridge Types NCHRP Project 25-25, Task 15 Prepared for The National Cooperative Highway Research Program Transportation Research Council National Research Council Prepared By Parsons Brinckerhoff and Engineering and Industrial Heritage October 2005 NCHRP Project 25-25, Task 15 A Context For Common Historic Bridge Types TRANSPORATION RESEARCH BOARD NAS-NRC PRIVILEGED DOCUMENT This report, not released for publication, is furnished for review to members or participants in the work of the National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP). It is to be regarded as fully privileged, and dissemination of the information included herein must be approved by the NCHRP. Prepared for The National Cooperative Highway Research Program Transportation Research Council National Research Council Prepared By Parsons Brinckerhoff and Engineering and Industrial Heritage October 2005 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF SPONSORSHIP This work was sponsored by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials in cooperation with the Federal Highway Administration, and was conducted in the National Cooperative Highway Research Program, which is administered by the Transportation Research Board of the National Research Council. DISCLAIMER The opinions and conclusions expressed or implied in the report are those of the research team. They are not necessarily those of the Transportation Research Board, the National Research Council, the Federal Highway Administration, the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, or the individual states participating in the National Cooperative Highway Research Program. i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The research reported herein was performed under NCHRP Project 25-25, Task 15, by Parsons Brinckerhoff and Engineering and Industrial Heritage. Margaret Slater, AICP, of Parsons Brinckerhoff (PB) was principal investigator for this project and led the preparation of the report.
    [Show full text]
  • 7. Gulph Creek Stone Arch Bridge (1789), Spanning Gulph Creek at Old Gulph Road, Upper Merion, Montgomery County, PA
    Chapter 3—Historic Context for Common Historic Bridge Types 7. Gulph Creek Stone Arch Bridge (1789), spanning Gulph Creek at Old Gulph Road, Upper Merion, Montgomery County, PA. HAER PA-309. 8. Possum Kingdom Stone Arch Bridge (1940-42), spanning Brazos River at State Route 16, Graford, Palo Pinto County, TX HAER TX-62. Figures 3-42 through 3-46 depict a drawing and examples of stone arch structures. Figure 3-42. Elevation drawing of stone arch bridge. Keystone Figure 3-43. Gulph Creek Stone Arch Bridge (1789), Old Gulph Road, Upper Merion, Montgomery County, Pennsylvania. This eighteenth century stone arch bridge is one of the oldest surviving bridges in Pennsylvania. Figure 44. “S" Bridge (first quarter nineteenth century), West of Cambridge, Ohio. This 1933 photograph shows an “S” Bridge on the Old National Road. 3-51 Chapter 3—Historic Context for Common Historic Bridge Types Figure 3-45. Cabin John Aqueduct Bridge (1864), MacArthur Boulevard, spanning Cabin John Creek at Cabin John, Maryland. With a single arch span of 220 feet, this bridge was the longest masonry arch bridge in the world until 1905. Figure 3-46. Possum Kingdom Stone Arch Bridge (1940-42), spanning Brazos River at State Route 16, Graford, Texas. This structure is an example of a Works Progress Administration-built stone arch bridge. 3-52 Chapter 3—Historic Context for Common Historic Bridge Types 3.2.2 Reinforced Concrete Melan/von Emperger/Thacher Arch History and Description: The first concrete arch bridge in the United States was a plain, un-reinforced concrete footbridge with a 31-foot span, constructed in Prospect Park, Brooklyn, New York, in 1871.
    [Show full text]
  • Rkch, 1PTS AXD Dissurskaih:NTS (A VPARENT and ACTUAL)
    COMBINED STATEMENT OF THE RKCh, 1PTS AXD DISSURSKAIh:NTS (A VPARENT AND ACTUAL) THE UX1TKD STATES FOLIC THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1878 COAlB I NED STATE llENT i)F TEER RECEIPTS A ND DISBU RS K 11 ENTS (APPARENT AiVD ACTUALl 'I'HE tJNITED STATES FOR TEIE I& is&-, nl beni ended tuu&. '30, 18'7~E. TREASURY DEPARTMENT IVAsHIN&ETCN, D. ('. , Deeembe& I, 1873. SEz: I» compliauce with instrn&tio»s received f&om yo», I have prepared tbr publication in the Bool- of Estimates a combined statement of the receipts and disburse1»ents of the Govern»1ent, by appropriatio»s, exclusive ot' the principal of the public debt, for the fiscal year ended J»n&* 30, 1873, exhibitiug the various so»&c&s of tl» revenues; th& apparent expenses of each brauch of the service under the several Depart1nc»ls, and of each D& p;«t»1&»t. on;«;co»nt of 'salnri&s, " "oEdjnary exp& nscs, " "public wo&k», " "miscellaneous, " and "unusnal and extraordinary;" an&1 the actual &.&1)&»&see of the same, a»d the actual revenues, by deductions frou1 them of those items which;1ppear i» both accounts by requirements of law, but which are not actual revenues or true expenCktures, and other iten1s on acco»»t of bra»ches of the se& & i«e i»tended to be self-supportiug. the expeuses and revenues of which must by l;&w enter into the accounts of the Treasury. I have the ho»or to be, very respectfully, yonr obedie»t servant, 'HAS F DONA VT Chaef of Warrant Drv&sion.
    [Show full text]
  • Interstate Certified Shellfish Shippers List
    MARCH 2020 Interstate Certified Shellfish * Shippers List * Fresh and Frozen Oysters, Clams, Mussels, Whole or Roe-on Scallops U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Public Health Service Food and Drug Administration INTRODUCTION THE SHIPPERS LISTED HAVE BEEN CERTIFIED BY REGULATORY AUTHORITIES IN THE UNITED STATES, CANADA, KOREA, MEXICO AND NEW ZEALAND UNDER THE UNIFORM SANITATION REQUIREMENTS OF THE NATIONAL SHELLFISH PROGRAM. CONTROL MEASURES OF THE STATES ARE EVALUATED BY THE UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION (FDA). CANADIAN, KOREAN, MEXICAN AND NEW ZEALAND SHIPPERS ARE INCLUDED UNDER THE TERMS OF THE SHELLFISH SANITATION AGREEMENTS BETWEEN FDA AND THE GOVERNMENTS OF THESE COUNTRIES. Persons interested in receiving information and publications F. Raymond Burditt about the National Shellfish Sanitation Program contact: National Shellfish Standard Office of Food Safety Division of Seafood Safety 5001 Campus Drive College Park, MD 20740-3835 (240) 402-1562 (FAX) 301-436-2601 [email protected] Persons interested in receiving information about the Charlotte V. Epps Interstate Certified Shellfish Shippers List (ICSSL) contact: Retail Food & Cooperative Programs Coordination Staff, HFS-320 Food and Drug Administration 5001 Campus Drive College Park, MD 20740-3835 (240) 402-2154 (FAX) 301-436-2632 Persons interested in receiving information about the ISSC Interstate Shellfish Sanitation Conference (ISSC) contact: Attn: Ken B. Moore, Executive Director 209-2 Dawson Road Columbia, SC 29223 (803) 788-7559 (FAX) 803-788-7576 Email: [email protected] Web Page: http://www.issc.org CFSAN Information Line 1-888-SAFEFOOD (723)-3366 ICSSL Monthly Listing FDA/CFSAN Web Homepage http://www.fda.gov/Food/GuidanceRegulation/FederalStateFoodPrograms/ucm2006753.htm NSSP Model Ordinance http://www.fda.gov/Food/GuidanceRegulation/FederalStateFoodPrograms/ucm2006754.htm 2 Definitions: Shellfish - All edible species of oysters, clams, mussels, and scallops;* either shucked or in the shell, fresh or frozen, whole or in part.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 70, No. 141/Monday, July 25, 2005/Notices
    42586 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 141 / Monday, July 25, 2005 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Riverside County MINNESOTA Corona High School, 815 W. 6th St., Corona, Lake Of The Woods County National Park Service 05000772 Canadian National Railways Depot, 420 N. National Register of Historic Places; Tulare County Main Ave., Baudette, 05000809 Notification of Pending Nominations Crawford House, 1184 Crawford Ave., Ramsey County Steamboat Springs, 05000782 and Related Actions Hamm, Theodore, Brewing Company, Nominations for the following COLORADO Minnehaha Ave. E, bet Payne Ave. and Stroh Dr., St. Paul, 05000832 properties being considered for listing Las Animas County or related actions in the National First Methodist Episcopal Church, 216 MISSOURI Register were received by the National Broom St., Trinidad, 05000783 Jackson County Park Service before June 25, 2005. Pursuant to § 60.13 of 36 CFR part 60 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Graphic Arts Building, 934 Wyandotte St., Kansas City, 05000810 written comments concerning the District of Columbia significance of these properties under Dumblane, Address Restricted, Washington, St. Louis County the National Register criteria for 05000784 Beverly Theater, 7740 Olive Blvd., University evaluation may be forwarded by United City, 05000811 GEORGIA States Postal Service, to the National St. Louis Independent City Register of Historic Places, National Muscogee County Park Service, 1849 C St. NW., 2280, Cadillac Automobile Company Building, Silver’s Five and Dime Storee—H.L. Green (Auto-Related Resources of St. Louis, Washington, DC 20240; by all other Co., (Columbus MRA) 1101–1103 Missouri MPS) 3224 Locust St., St. Louis carriers, National Register of Historic Broadway, Columbus, 05000794 (Indpendent City), 05000812 Places, National Park Service, 1201 Eye Tarver, C.B., Building, (Columbus MRA) 18– St.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 70, No. 141/Monday, July 25, 2005/Notices
    Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 141 / Monday, July 25, 2005 / Notices 42587 MPS) OR Coast 9, U.S. 101, MO127.61, Windham County Russell Family Historic District, 35, 65, 85 N. Depoe Bay, 05000823 Butterfield House, 204 Main St., Grafton, Central, 228, 334 Robin Hill, 101 Rocky Creek Bridge No. 01089, (McCullough, 05000806 Russwood, Alexandria, 05000839 C.B., Major Oregon Coast Highway Bridges Grafton Post Office, 205 Main St., Grafton, South Central Historic District, Bounded by MPS) Otter Crest Loop Rd., U.S. 101 05000807 Broad St., Tallpoosa St., Cherokee Rd., frontage road, MP F130.00, Otter Rock, Bishop St., Franklin St., Willow St., 05000824 [FR Doc. 05–14549 Filed 7–22–05; 8:45 am] Alexander City, 05000840 Yaquina Bay Bridge No. 01820, (McCullough, BILLING CODE 4312–51–P CALIFORNIA C.B., Major Oregon Coast Highway Bridges MPS) OR Coast 9, U.S. 101, MP141.67, San Bernardino County Newport, 05000821 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Euclid Avenue, From 24th St. in Upland to Philadelphia St. in Ontario, Upland and Multnomah County National Park Service Ontario, 05000843 Hiberian Hall, (Eliot Neighborhood MPS) 128 COLORADO NE Russell, Portland, 05000826 National Register of Historic Places; Malarkey, Herbert and Elizabeth, House, Notification of Pending Nominations Chaffee County 1717 SW Elm St., Portland, 05000827 and Related Actions Hutchinson Ranch (Boundary Increase), 8911 Northwest Fence and Wire Works, 400 NE W U.S. 50, Salida, 05000847 11th Ave., Portland, 05000828 Nominations for the following FLORIDA Tillamook County properties being considered for listing Manatee County Wilson River Bridge No. 01499, or related actions in the National Jordan, Rufus P., House, 760 Broadway St., (McCullough, C.B., Major Oregon Coast Register were received by the National Longboat Key, 05000844 Highway Bridges MPS) OR Coast 9, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • ROUTE 1 NOTTOWAY RIVER BRIDGE HAER No. VA-120 U.S. Route 1 Spanning Not Toway River Mckenney Vicinity Dinwiddie County HP\ER Virginia V£V I
    ROUTE 1 NOTTOWAY RIVER BRIDGE HAER No. VA-120 U.S. Route 1 spanning Not toway River McKenney Vicinity Dinwiddie County HP\ER Virginia V£V i PHOTOGRAPHS WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD National Park Service Philadelphia Support Office U.S. Custom House 200 Chestnut Street Philadelphia, PA 19106 ta HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD ROUTE 1 NOTTOWAY RIVER BRIDGE HAER NO. VA-120 LOCATION: U.S. Route 1 spanning Nottoway River, McKenney vicinity, Dinwiddie county, Virginia. USGS McKenney, VA Quadrangle UTM Coordinates: 18.256550.4092120 DATE OF CONSTRUCTION: 1927 BUILDER: Virginia State Highway Department, William P. Glidden, bridge engineer; Hagedorn Construction Company, contractor. PRESENT OWNER: Virginia Department of Transportation PRESENT USE: Highway bridge SIGNIFICANCE: The Route 1 Nottoway River Bridge is an example of a short-span concrete through-arch highway bridge of the extremely rare tied-arch type. The bridge was part of the final construction project completing the realignment and concrete paving of Route 1 from Washington, D.C., through Virginia to Raleigh, North Carolina, an important event in national and state transportation history. PROJECT INFORMATION: The Route 1 Nottoway River Bridge was recorded in October 1996 by the Cultural Resource Group of Louis Berger & Associates, Inc., Richmond, Virginia, for the Virginia Department of Transportation. The recordation was undertaken pursuant to a Memorandum of Agreement between the Virginia State Historic Preservation Officer and the Virginia Department of Transportation. Project personnel included Richard M. Casella, Senior Architectural Historian; Philip E. Pendleton, Architectural Historian; and Rob Tucher, Senior Photographer. ROUTE 1 NOTTOWAY RIVER BRIDGE HAER No.
    [Show full text]
  • BA? ^ National Register of Historic Places / /^^{^Dpo ^- Registration Form / / JUN ^^Sf^O
    NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 00.SC, ^ United States Department of the Interior National Park Service /^^^/?^BA? _^ National Register of Historic Places / /^^{^Dpo ^- Registration Form / / JUN ^^Sf^O This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts/ &9i i^Ernetians in HdfeMU£onfplete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item^Jig^aj^ifla WjjjSc^acgropriatB box or by entering the information requested. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" {(^^i'^^t^^^^f^^^/^^^^^ classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instmctions. Place S^^waYlgp^ies and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. ' 1. Name of Property_________________________________ historic name Wilson River Bridge No. 01499 other names/site number Wilson River Bridge at Tillamook 2. Location street & number Oregon Coast Highway No. 9 (US 101). MP 64.23 not for publication _ city or town Tillamook______________ vicinity X state Oregon__________ code OR county Tillamook_______ code 057 zip code 97141____ 3. State/Federal/Tribal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this E3 nomination D request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property EEJ meets D does not meet the National Register Criteria.
    [Show full text]