DOCSLIB.ORG

Ken Wilson: a Scientific Appreciation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ken Wilson: a Scientific Appreciation RETROSPECTIVE RETROSPECTIVE Ken Wilson: A scientific appreciation Frank A. Wilczek1 Center for Theoretical Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139 This brief retrospective is an overview and die. We will have colossal domains, per- celebration of Kenneth Wilson’sprofound meated by huge subdomains, themselves contributions to science, meant to be acces- permeated by very large subdomains. By sible to a broad scientific audience. Wilson’s considering the differently sized domains lecture on receipt of the 1982 Nobel Prize (1) as material objects in their own right, we gives a more technical and detailed descrip- discover a plausible explanation for why tion of his central work, including historical the emergent structure is both self-similar perspective and extensive references. and self-determining (i.e., scale invariant and Phase transitions, such as the boiling of universal). August de Morgan’s couplet (6) water, are a familiar phenomenon of every- captures the essence of this picture: day life. J. W. Gibbs (2), J. van der Waals (3), fl fl and others, in now-classic work, illumi- Great eas have little eas upon their backs to bite ’em, nated many aspects of phase transitions. fl fl And little eas have lesser eas, and so Ken Wilson. However, one feature, known as critical be- ad infinitum. havior, stubbornly eluded theoretical under- standing even as it revealed astonishing Kadanoff ’s picture is insightful and com- In experiments at ever higher energies we regularities. pelling, but does not in itself provide a quan- probe ever shorter distances. To describe such By way of illustration, it will be easiest to titative tool. Wilson’s breakthrough work (7, experiments, we now gradually “integrate in” discuss a concrete special case. As a ferro- 8) in 1971 did just that. The mathematical short-distance fluctuations. In 1969 Wilson magnet is heated, its magnetism diminishes, technique is too complicated for meaningful sketched (10) how one might apply this ver- until at a critical temperature (the Curie tem- presentation here. It is both possible and ap- sion of renormalization group ideas, given perature) it vanishes altogether. Closer study propriate, however, to mention the techni- a theory of the strong interaction. At Prince- reveals surprising regularities, first clearly que’sleadingideas. ton in the spring of 1972, Wilson gave a series codified by B. Widom (4). Just below the We have fluctuations on many different of seminars on his recent work, which both critical temperature, the strength of the length scales that overlap and affect one David Gross and I attended. Those inspiring remaining magnetic field vanishes as a frac- another. Because we are most interested in lectures informed our subsequent research tional power, called the “critical exponent,” behavior at very large scales, we will be sat- and helped to lure me from mathematics of the temperature difference. Amazingly, fi fi is ed to nd an effective theory that averages to physics. Building on Wilson’sindications, the same value of the critical exponent is “ ” fl fl or integrates out the in uence of uctua- andworkingbackward,weusedobserved observed in many different materials with tions smaller than some cut-off. Wilson was phenomena to infer the required theory vastly different Curie temperatures, a prop- able to formulate equations that describe how (11). [H. D. Politzer (12) performed the erty we call “universality.” Thus, critical the effective theory changes as one changes key calculation independently.] That the- exponents are nontrivial numbers, char- the cut-off slightly. This concept, that one ory,quantumchromodynamicsorQCD,is acteristic of macroscopic matter, that can derive equivalent effective theories with emerge “from nothing.” Why do they exist, now accepted as the fundamental theory of different cut-offs, is called the “renormaliza- why are they universal, and how can we the strong force. tion group.” At the critical point, where the compute them? Wilson was quick to appreciate the prom- dynamics is scale-invariant, the form of the Leo Kadanoff (5) supplied a physical pic- ise of QCD, but he realized that to calculate effective theory must be independent of the ’ ture that answers the first two of these ques- the theory s consequences at (relatively) low ’ cut-off. That requirement, formulated as an energies or long distances would be a de- tions. (Please note, however, that Kadanoff s ’ discussion is considerably more sophisticated equation, determines the theory. In collabo- manding task. Wilson sapproach(13)was than the following caricature.) We can think ration with Michael Fisher, Wilson found revolutionary in its directness: He formulated of the magnet as having domains, within a simple way to get approximate solutions. the theory in computer-friendly form, essen- fi which the underlying spins share a common Their paper (9), with the wonderful title tially as a complicated de nite integral in “ ” alignment. Below the critical temperature Critical phenomena in 3.99 dimensions, a space of enormously large dimension, and asingledomainpermeatestheentiresam- launched an avalanche of extensions and then set out to perform the integral nu- ple, and so there is a nonzero net magne- applications. merically. Many years passed before com- tization. Above the critical temperature no We also must deal with fluctuations in the puters and algorithms were up to the job, fi single domain permeates the sample, and quantum-field theories relevant to high- but lattice gauge theory amply ful lled the magnetization averages to zero. Near the energy physics: they are quantum fluctua- critical temperature there are domains that tions, rather than thermal fluctuations, but Author contributions: F.A.W. wrote the paper. nearly permeate the sample but eventually they pose related mathematical challenges. 1E-mail: [email protected]. www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1312463110 PNAS | August 6, 2013 | vol. 110 | no. 32 | 12855–12856 Downloaded by guest on October 1, 2021 Wilson’svision.Thehighestawardinthe students encounter in learning, and to over- Ken Wilson radiated joy in his work. As I field, awarded annually at the major interna- come them. It would be unwise to bet against visualize him delivering a seminar, invariably tional conference in Lattice Field Theory, Wilson’s prophetic visions. he is smiling. bears Wilson’sname. Wilson loved to work with computers— preferably supercomputers—and was a 1 Wilson KG (1993) Nobel Lecture: “The renormalization group and critical 7 Wilson KG (1971) Renormalization group and critical phenomena. phenomena.” Nobel Lectures 1981–1990, ed Ekspöng G (World Scientific, I. Renormalization group and the Kadanoff scaling picture. Phys Rev B prophet on their behalf. It is no accident Singapore). Available at http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/ 4:3174–3183. that Paul Ginsparg, the primary architect 1982/wilson-lecture.pdf#search=’wilson‘. Accessed July 15, 2013. 8 Wilson KG (1971) Renormalization group and critical phenomena. II. of arXiv.org, was his student. 2 Gibbs JW (1874–1878) On the Equilibrium of Heterogeneous Phase-space cell analysis of critical behavior. Phys Rev B 4:3184–3205. ’ Substances. Transactions of the Connecticut Academy of Arts and 9 Wilson KG, Fisher ME (1972) Critical exponents in 3.99 In later years Wilson s interests turned to- Sciences 3:108–248, 343–524. dimensions. Phys Rev Lett 28:240–243. ward other challenges. He strove to bring the 3 Van der Waals J (1910) The Equation of State for Gases and Liquids 10 Wilson KG (1969) Non-lagrangian models in current algebra. (Nobel Lecture). Available at http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/ Phys Rev 179:1499–1512. power of supercomputing and the lessons of laureates/1910/waals-lecture.pdf. Accessed July 15, 2012. 11 Gross D, Wilczek F (1973) Ultraviolet behavior of non-Abelian critical behavior and QCD to bear on quan- 4 Widom B (1965) Equation of state in the neighborhood of the gauge theories. Phys Rev Lett 30:1343–1346. tum chemistry. In a more radical departure, critical point J. Chem Phys 43:3898–3905. 12 Politzer HD (1973) Reliable perturbative results for strong 5 Kadanoff L (1966) Scaling laws for Ising models near Tc. Physics 2:263. interactions? Phys Rev Lett 30:1346–1349. Wilson proposed to use computers to diag- 6 De Morgan A (1872) A Budget of Paradoxes # 377 (Longmans 13 Wilson KG (1974) Confinement of quarks. Phys Rev D Part Fields nose, scientifically, the specificdifficulties that Green, London). 10(8):2445–2459. 12856 | www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1312463110 Wilczek Downloaded by guest on October 1, 2021.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Advances in Theoretical & Computational Physics
    ISSN: 2639-0108 Research Article Advances in Theoretical & Computational Physics Supreme Theory of Everything Ulaanbaatar Tarzad *Corresponding author Ulaanbaatar Tarzad, Department of Physics, School of Applied Sciences, Department of Physics, School of Applied Sciences, Mongolian Mongolian University of Science and Technology, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia, University of Science and Technology E-mail: [email protected] Submitted: 27 Mar 2019; Accepted: 24 Apr 2019; Published: 06 June 2019 Abstract Not only universe, but everything has general characters as eternal, infinite, cyclic and wave-particle duality. Everything from elementary particles to celestial bodies, from electromagnetic wave to gravity is in eternal motions, which dissects only to circle. Since everything is described only by trigonometry. Without trigonometry and mathematical circle, the science cannot indicate all the beauty of harmonic universe. Other method may be very good, but it is not perfect. Some part is very nice, another part is problematic. General Theory of Relativity holds that gravity is geometric. Quantum Mechanics describes all particles by wave function of trigonometry. In this paper using trigonometry, particularly mathematics circle, a possible version of the unification of partial theories, evolution history and structure of expanding universe, and the parallel universes are shown. Keywords: HRD, Trigonometry, Projection of Circle, Singularity, The reality of universe describes by geometry, because of that not Celestial Body, Black Hole and Parallel Universes. only gravity is geometrical, but everything is it and nothing is linear. One of the important branches of geometry is trigonometry dealing Introduction with circle and triangle. For this reason, it is easier to describe nature Today scientists describe the universe in terms of two basic partial of universe by mathematics circle.
    [Show full text]
  • The Discovery of Asymptotic Freedom
    The Discovery of Asymptotic Freedom The 2004 Nobel Prize in Physics, awarded to David Gross, Frank Wilczek, and David Politzer, recognizes the key discovery that explained how quarks, the elementary constituents of the atomic nucleus, are bound together to form protons and neutrons. In 1973, Gross and Wilczek, working at Princeton, and Politzer, working independently at Harvard, showed that the attraction between quarks grows weaker as the quarks approach one another more closely, and correspondingly that the attraction grows stronger as the quarks are separated. This discovery, known as “asymptotic freedom,” established quantum chromodynamics (QCD) as the correct theory of the strong nuclear force, one of the four fundamental forces in Nature. At the time of the discovery, Wilczek was a 21-year-old graduate student working under Gross’s supervision at Princeton, while Politzer was a 23-year-old graduate student at Harvard. Currently Gross is the Director of the Kavli Institute for Theoretical Physics at the University of California at Santa Barbara, and Wilczek is the Herman Feshbach Professor of Physics at MIT. Politzer is Professor of Theoretical Physics at Caltech; he joined the Caltech faculty in 1976. Of the four fundamental forces --- the others besides the strong nuclear force are electromagnetism, the weak nuclear force (responsible for the decay of radioactive nuclei), and gravitation --- the strong force was by far the most poorly understood in the early 1970s. It had been suggested in 1964 by Caltech physicist Murray Gell-Mann that protons and neutrons contain more elementary objects, which he called quarks. Yet isolated quarks are never seen, indicating that the quarks are permanently bound together by powerful nuclear forces.
    [Show full text]
  • Standard Model of Particle Physics, Or Beyond?
    Standard Model of Particle Physics, or Beyond? Mariano Quir´os High Energy Phys. Inst., BCN (Spain) ICTP-SAIFR, November 13th, 2019 Outline The outline of this colloquium is I Standard Model: reminder I Electroweak interactions I Strong interactions I The Higgs sector I Experimental successes I Theoretical and observational drawbacks I Beyond the Standard Model I Supersymmetry I Large extra dimensions I Warped extra dimensions/composite Higgs I Concluding remarks Disclaimer: I will not discuss any technical details. With my apologies to my theorist (and experimental) colleagues The Standard Model: reminder I The knowledge of the Standard Model of strong and electroweak interactions requires (as any other physical theory) the knowledge of I The elementary particles or fields (the characters of the play) I How particles interact (their behavior) The characters of the play I Quarks: spin-1/2 fermions I Leptons: spin-1/2 fermions I Higgs boson: spin-0 boson I Carriers of the interactions: spin-1 (gauge) bosons I All these particles have already been discovered and their mass, spin, and charge measured \More in detail the characters of the play" - Everybody knows the Periodic Table of the Elements - Compare elementary particles with some (of course composite) very heavy nuclei What are the interactions between the elementary building blocks of the Standard Model? I Interactions are governed by a symmetry principle I The more symmetric the theory the more couplings are related (the less of them they are) and the more predictive it is Strong interactions:
    [Show full text]
  • The Quantum Structure of Space and Time
    QcEntwn Structure &pace and Time This page intentionally left blank Proceedings of the 23rd Solvay Conference on Physics Brussels, Belgium 1 - 3 December 2005 The Quantum Structure of Space and Time EDITORS DAVID GROSS Kavli Institute. University of California. Santa Barbara. USA MARC HENNEAUX Universite Libre de Bruxelles & International Solvay Institutes. Belgium ALEXANDER SEVRIN Vrije Universiteit Brussel & International Solvay Institutes. Belgium \b World Scientific NEW JERSEY LONOON * SINGAPORE BElJlNG * SHANGHAI HONG KONG TAIPEI * CHENNAI Published by World Scientific Publishing Co. Re. Ltd. 5 Toh Tuck Link, Singapore 596224 USA ofJice: 27 Warren Street, Suite 401-402, Hackensack, NJ 07601 UK ofice; 57 Shelton Street, Covent Garden, London WC2H 9HE British Library Cataloguing-in-PublicationData A catalogue record for this hook is available from the British Library. THE QUANTUM STRUCTURE OF SPACE AND TIME Proceedings of the 23rd Solvay Conference on Physics Copyright 0 2007 by World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd. All rights reserved. This book, or parts thereoi may not be reproduced in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or any information storage and retrieval system now known or to be invented, without written permission from the Publisher. For photocopying of material in this volume, please pay a copying fee through the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, USA. In this case permission to photocopy is not required from the publisher. ISBN 981-256-952-9 ISBN 981-256-953-7 (phk) Printed in Singapore by World Scientific Printers (S) Pte Ltd The International Solvay Institutes Board of Directors Members Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Sam Treiman Was Born in Chicago to a First-Generation Immigrant Family
    NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES SAM BARD TREIMAN 1925–1999 A Biographical Memoir by STEPHEN L. ADLER Any opinions expressed in this memoir are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Academy of Sciences. Biographical Memoirs, VOLUME 80 PUBLISHED 2001 BY THE NATIONAL ACADEMY PRESS WASHINGTON, D.C. Courtesy of Robert P. Matthews SAM BARD TREIMAN May 27, 1925–November 30, 1999 BY STEPHEN L. ADLER AM BARD TREIMAN WAS a major force in particle physics S during the formative period of the current Standard Model, both through his own research and through the training of graduate students. Starting initially in cosmic ray physics, Treiman soon shifted his interests to the new particles being discovered in cosmic ray experiments. He evolved a research style of working closely with experimen- talists, and many of his papers are exemplars of particle phenomenology. By the mid-1950s Treiman had acquired a lifelong interest in the weak interactions. He would preach to his students that “the place to learn about the strong interactions is through the weak and electromagnetic inter- actions; the problem is half as complicated.’’ The history of the subsequent development of the Standard Model showed this philosophy to be prophetic. After the discovery of parity violation in weak interactions, Treiman in collaboration with J. David Jackson and Henry Wyld (1957) worked out the definitive formula for allowed beta decays, taking into account the possible violation of time reversal symmetry, as well as parity. Shortly afterwards Treiman embarked with Marvin Goldberger on a dispersion relations analysis (1958) of pion and nucleon beta decay, a 3 4 BIOGRAPHICAL MEMOIRS major outcome of which was the famed Goldberger-Treiman relation for the charged pion decay amplitude.
    [Show full text]
  • Deconstruction: Standard Model Discoveries
    deconstruction: standard model discoveries elementary types of particles form the basis for the theoretical framework known as the Sixteen Standard Model of fundamental particles and forces. J.J. Thomson discovered the electron in 1897, while scientists at Fermilab saw the first direct interaction of a tau neutrino with matter less than 10 years ago. This graphic names the 16 particle types and shows when and where they were discovered. These particles also exist in the form of antimatter particles, with the same mass and the opposite electric charge. Together, they account for about 300 subatomic particles observed in experiments so far. The Standard Model also predicts the Higgs boson, which still eludes experimental detection. Experiments at Fermilab and CERN could see the first signals for this particle in the next couple of years. Other funda- mental particles must exist, too. The Standard Model does not account for dark matter, which appears to make up 83 percent of all matter in the universe. 1968: SLAC 1974: Brookhaven & SLAC 1995: Fermilab 1979: DESY u c t g up quark charm quark top quark gluon 1968: SLAC 1947: Manchester University 1977: Fermilab 1923: Washington University* d s b γ down quark strange quark bottom quark photon 1956: Savannah River Plant 1962: Brookhaven 2000: Fermilab 1983: CERN νe νμ ντ W electron neutrino muon neutrino tau neutrino W boson 1897: Cavendish Laboratory 1937 : Caltech and Harvard 1976: SLAC 1983: CERN e μ τ Z electron muon tau Z boson *Scientists suspected for several hundred years that light consists of particles. Many experiments and theoretical explana- tions have led to the discovery of the photon, which explains both wave and particle properties of light.
    [Show full text]
  • Gross, David 382 Word-BIO (1-2020)
    DAVID J. GROSS David Gross is the Chancellor’s Chair Professor of Theoretical Physics and former Director of the Kavli Institute for Theoretical Physics at UCSB. He received his Ph.D. in 1966 at UC Berkeley and was previously Thomas Jones Professor of Mathematical Physics at Princeton University. He has been a central figure in particle physics and string theory. His discovery, with his student Frank Wilczek, of asymptotic freedom—the primary feature of non-Abelian gauge theories—led Gross and Wilczek to the formulation of Quantum Chromodynamics, the theory of the strong nuclear force. Asymptotic freedom is a phenomenon where the nuclear force weakens at short distances, which explains why experiments at very high energy can be understood as if nuclear particles are made of non-interacting quarks. The flip side of asymptotic freedom is that the force between quarks grows stronger as one tries to separate them. This is the reason why the nucleus of an atom can never be broken into its quark constituents. QCD completed the Standard Model, which details the three basic forces of particle physics--the electromagnetic force, the weak force, and the strong force. Gross was awarded the 2004 Nobel Prize in Physics, with Politzer and Wilczek, for this discovery. He has also made seminal contributions to the theory of Superstrings, a burgeoning enterprise that brings gravity into the quantum framework. With collaborators, he originated the "Heterotic String Theory," the prime candidate for a unified theory of all the forces of nature. He continues to do research in this field at the KITP, a world center of physics.
    [Show full text]
  • Nobel Laureate Prof David Gross the Future of Physics Research by David Kum Wei Kuan
    10 Schools Section www.innovationmagazine.com Interactive Sessions with Nobel Laureate Prof David Gross The Future of Physics Research by David Kum Wei Kuan n 27 August 2013, the NUS High School of Mathematics and Science had the honor of hosting an interactive session Owith Prof David Gross (Nobel Laureate in Physics 2004). The event was coordinated by the Institute of Advanced Studies and the Science Centre Singapore in relation to the “Sketches of Science” exhibition of Nobel Laureates. Prof Gross is one of the theorists working on the asymptotic freedom in theory of the strong interaction back in 1973 along with Prof Frank Wilczek and Prof David Poltzer. He was awarded the Nobel Prize for this Prof David Gross work in this area, along with many other notable achievements explaining some of the concepts in such as the Dirac Medal in 1988. quantum physics. Prof Gross’s lecture was well received by the students. The talk covered the background of quantum physics, providing rich and substantial insights to the budding scientists of NUS High who were looking to start their explorations in the field of the quantum world. After a quick run-through of the history, Prof Gross updated the students on the latest news in the field of particle physics, highlighting especially the discovery of the Higgs boson which The students were created much excitement throughout the international scientific enthused by Prof Gross’s lively and community. engaging talk. Prof Gross highlighted the characteristics students should strive to attain so as to become good researchers. Being constantly curious, having the ability to aim high and fall hard, and a genuine passion and love for physics were some of the points he mentioned.
    [Show full text]
  • Renormalization Group Methods
    Renormalization Group Methods Porter Williams It is a truism, in physics if not in philosophy, that in order to study phys- ical behavior at a particular scale one is best served by using degrees of free- dom defined at (or suitably near) that scale. If one wants to study the classi- cal behavior of a simple fluid on relatively long length scales ( 10−10m), for example, the appropriate degrees of freedom to use to describe the fluid are two continuous fields, the mass density ρ(x) and the velocity field v(x). This despite the fact that the fluid itself is constituted by a large collection of dis- crete, atomic constituents, which in turn have their own subatomic structure. Remarkably, one can do a tremendous amount of empirically successful fluid dynamics ignoring almost entirely the more \fundamental," discrete descrip- tion of the fluid and modeling its long-distance behavior using “effective" continuum degrees of freedom. Even in purportedly fundamental physics the truism holds. For example, consider quantum chromodynamics, the theory that describes the physics of quarks and gluons interacting via the strong force. Although hadrons (such as protons and neutrons and pions) interact via the strong force and are (in a rather complicated sense) \composed" of quarks and gluons, a considerable amount of low-energy nuclear physics proceeds perfectly well by modeling nuclear processes in ways that ignore those \fundamental" quark and gluon degrees of freedom entirely, modeling physical processes in terms of “effective" hadronic degrees of freedom. If one wants to model the low- energy scattering of pions off of a fixed nucleon target, for example, one is better off eschewing any attempt to describe the scattering in terms of the 1 \fundamental" quark and gluon degrees of freedom in favor of an “effective" description in terms of pions and nucleons.
    [Show full text]
  • Conceptual Foundations of Quantum Field Theory Quantum Field Theory Is a Powerful Language for the Description of The
    Conceptual foundations of quantum ®eld theory Quantum ®eld theory is a powerful language for the description of the sub- atomic constituents of the physical world and the laws and principles that govern them. This book contains up-to-date in-depth analyses, by a group of eminent physicists and philosophers of science, of our present understanding of its conceptual foundations, of the reasons why this understanding has to be revised so that the theory can go further, and of possible directions in which revisions may be promising and productive. These analyses will be of interest to students of physics who want to know about the foundational problems of their subject. The book will also be of interest to professional philosophers, historians and sociologists of science. It contains much material for metaphysical and methodological re¯ection on the subject; it will also repay historical and cultural analyses of the theories discussed in the book, and sociological analyses of the way in which various factors contribute to the way the foundations are revised. The authors also re¯ect on the tension between physicists on the one hand and philosophers and historians of science on the other, when revision of the foundations becomes an urgent item on the agenda. This work will be of value to graduate students and research workers in theoretical physics, and in the history, philosophy and sociology of science, who have an interest in the conceptual foundations of quantum ®eld theory. For Bob and Sam Conceptual foundations of quantum ®eld theory EDITOR TIAN YU CAO Boston University PUBLISHED BY THE PRESS SYNDICATE OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE The Pitt Building, Trumpington Street, Cambridge CB2 1RP, United Kingdom CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge CB2 2RU, UK http://www.cup.cam.ac.uk 40 West 20th Street, New York, NY 10011-4211, USA http://www.cup.org 10 Stamford Road, Oakleigh, Melbourne 3166, Australia # Cambridge University Press 1999 This book is in copyright.
    [Show full text]
  • Quarky Scientist Wins Nobel Prize Ensure Your Vote Is Counted
    u. 1- 1- u. en en 1- The campus community biweekly October 7, 2004, vol. 4, no. 14 Quarky scientist Teaming up against gravity wins Nobel Prize strong force, one of the four fundamen­ tal forces of nature. Caltech president David Baltimore, himself a Nobel laureate, said he was Hugh David Politzer has won the 2004 pleased that another Caltech faculty Nobel Prize in physics for work he be­ member has joined the list of the Insti­ gan as a graduate student on how the tute's Nobel recipients. "It's wonderful elementary particles known as quarks are that David was acknowledged for some­ bound together to form the protons and thing that was so far back in his career," neutrons of atomic nuclei. The announce­ Baltimore said. "It shows what young ment was made on Tuesday by the Royal people can do if they think differently." Swedish Academy of Sciences. Politzer joined the Caltech faculty as a Politzer, a professor of theoretical visiting associate in 1975, the year after physics at Caltech, shares the prize with finishing his Harvard PhD in physics and David Gross and Frank Wilczek. The key three years after publishing his work on discovery celebrated by today's prize was asymptotic freedom. He earned tenure made in 1973, when Politzer, a Harvard in 1976, became a full professor in 1979, University graduate student at the time, and served as executive officer of the and two physicists working indepen­ physics department from 1986 to 1988. dently from Politzer at Princeton Univer­ A native of New York City, Politzer sity-Gross and his graduate student earned his bachelor's degree from the Wilczek-theorized that quarks actually University of Michigan in 1969.
    [Show full text]
  • Laureate - David J
    Laureate - David J. Gross 23/12/2018, 05*01 (https://lindau-nobel.org/) Home Meetings About Outreach Support Press Mediatheque Blog Contact Search … Alumni (https://www.lindau- (https://lindau- (https://lindau- (https://lindau- (https://lindau- (https://lindau- (https://lindau- (http://www.mediatheque.lindau- (https://lindau- (https://lindau- nobel.org/login/? nobel.org/) nobel.org/meeting/) nobel.org/about/) nobel.org/outreach/) nobel.org/support/) nobel.org/press/) nobel.org/) nobel.org/blog/) nobel.org/contact/) redirect_to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.lindau- PROF. DR. DAVID J. GROSS nobel.org%2F) Nationality United States Institution University of California, Santa Barbara Award 2004 Discipline Physics Co-recipients Profs. Frank Wilczek and David Politzer Biography on the Official Web Site of the Nobel Prize (https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/physics/2004/gross/facts/) CURRICULUM VITAE As every schoolchild knows, everything is made up from atoms. Every atomic nucleus is made up from quarks – the smallest ‘building block’ there is. What acts as the cement, binding the blocks together, is the ‘strong force’, also known as the ‘colour force’, which acts between the quarks inside the proton and the neutron. However, unlike conventional forces such as magnetism or gravity, where the effects are stronger the closer together the objects are, the strong force works more like a rubber band, stronger – as if stretched – when the quarks are apart, but relaxed when the quarks are in close proximity. Then the force is so weak that they behave almost as free particles. This phenomenon is called ‘asymptotic freedom’. It was for this discovery that Gross, working with Frank Wilczek, and David Politzer, working independently, were awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics, 30 years after the theory was published in 1973 in a mathematical framework that came to be known as Quantum ChromoDynamics, QCD.
    [Show full text]