OPEN LETTER to the CONGRESS and PRESIDENT of the UNITED STATES Nobel Laureates and Science Community Leaders Comment on Harm to American Science from the Shutdown
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
OPEN LETTER TO THE CONGRESS AND PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES Nobel Laureates and Science Community Leaders Comment on Harm to American Science from the Shutdown February 11, 2019 Dear Mr. President and Members of Congress: As American scientists—researchers, teachers, heads of major national scientific societies and institutes, and Nobel Laureates—we are writing to call attention to the harm done to the US scientific enterprise by the recently ended partial shutdown of the federal government. The disruptions caused by the shutdown have consequences that will extend well beyond the shutdown, with the potential to affect many aspects of our society, including our economy, security, health, and international competitiveness. For decades, the US has led the world in basic scientific research. Our strength in fundamental research gave birth to the military technology that helped to end World War II and continues to safeguard us and our allies. Our past global scientific dominance fueled the technological innovations that have made our economy the strongest in the world. A critical component of that leadership was, and continues to be, sustained federal investment in basic research. Today, in a trend starting long before the recent disruption, our scientific leadership is threatened by other countries whose investment in research is growing more rapidly than our own. The government shutdown closed some of the agencies most crucial to the maintenance of our leadership and of the health of American science. The National Science Foundation (NSF) funds much of the basic research in our universities. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), and others produce fundamental research leading to innovations that improve our daily lives, our security, and our economy. Even the temporary loss of those activities has a profoundly disruptive effect on experimental work and the functions of research teams at a time when American scientific leadership is challenged by China and other international competitors. Make no mistake: although the shutdown’s effect on science will not be as immediately evident as were the long airport security lines, flight delays, and missing paychecks for federal employees, the effects will be longer lasting and more widespread. Major science agencies like the National Institutes of Health (NIH), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and the Department of Energy (DOE), which already had their funding approved and did not shut down, nevertheless felt the effects because important connections and collaborations with scientists supported by the shuttered agencies were put on hold. And scientists at non- government institutions, such as universities and research institutes, were impeded by the absence of staff at federal agencies that support their work. Science is essential to our technological society. The development of advanced materials and devices, new medical treatments, worldwide communication technologies, new energy sources, GPS navigation with our smartphones — essentially all the technologies used by modern societies — were enabled by federal support for fundamental science. Future advances will depend on additional programs, such as the newly enacted National Quantum Initiative, designed to change the landscape of military and commercial capabilities. But during the shutdown much of the new quantum research could not even begin, while China and Europe continued to develop the new quantum technology at full speed. Similarly, while NASA had to suspend some of its efforts to explore space, other countries continued their programs to plant probes in previously unexplored parts of our universe. Of even greater long-term consequence, the interruption of the careers of young researchers has likely caused some to question their future involvement in our national scientific adventure. We write to you now, at a time when another possible government shutdown looms, to draw your attention to the detrimental consequences of even short-term suspensions of federal funding on the nation’s scientific enterprise. We are encouraged by discussions of proposals that would protect science, among other critical activities, from the significant disruptions that occur during shutdowns of appreciable length, and we urge the avoidance of such lapses. Shutting down parts or all of the federally funded scientific enterprise, which enjoys support across the entire political spectrum, serves only our foreign competitors. Continued strong support for science benefits us all. Yours respectfully, Nobel Laureates Frances H. Arnold David Gross Nobel Laureate, Chemistry 2018 Nobel Laureate, Physics, 2004 President, American Physical Society David Baltimore Nobel Laureate, Physiology or Medicine, 1975 Robert H. Grubbs Nobel Laureate, Chemistry, 2005 J. Michael Bishop Nobel Laureate, Physiology or Medicine, 1989 Robert Horvitz Nobel Laureate, Physiology or Medicine, 2002 Michael S. Brown Nobel Laureate, Medicine or Physiology, 1985 Brian Kobilka Nobel Laureate, Chemistry, 2012 Steven Chu Nobel Laureate, Physics, 1997 Roger D. Kornberg President-elect, American Association for the Nobel Laureate, Chemistry, 2006 Advancement of Science W. E. Moerner Robert Curl Nobel Laureate, Chemistry, 2014 Nobel Laureate, Chemistry, 1996 William D. Phillips Joseph Goldstein Nobel Laureate, Physics, 1997 Nobel Laureate, Physiology or Medicine, 1985 Randy Schekman Carol Greider Nobel Laureate, Physiology or Medicine, 2013 Nobel Laureate, Physiology or Medicine, 2009 Richard R. Schrock Harold E. Varmus Nobel Laureate, Chemistry, 2005 Nobel Laureate, Physiology or Medicine, 1989 David J. Wineland Nobel Laureate, Physics, 2012 Science Community Leaders Bruce M. Alberts Erin O’Shea Former President, National Academy of President, Howard Hughes Medical Institute Sciences Kent Rochford Juliane Baron CEO, SPIE, the international society for optics Executive Director, Federation of and photonics Associations in Behavioral and Brain Sciences Catherine Roberts Executive Director, American Mathematical Sarah Brookhart Society Executive Director, Association for Psychological Science Elizabeth Rogan CEO, The Optical Society (OSA) Mary Sue Coleman President, Association of American Erika C. Shugart Universities CEO, American Society for Cell Biology Thomas M. Connelly Jr. Keith L. Seitter CEO, American Chemical Society Executive Director, American Meteorological Society Rush D. Holt CEO, American Association for the Shirley M. Tilghman Advancement of Science President Emerita, Princeton University Laura F. Huenneke Jamie L. Vernon President, Ecological Society of America Executive Director and CEO, Sigma Xi, The Scientific Research Honor Society Nancy Kidd Executive Director, American Sociological Mary Woolley Association President and CEO, Research!America Kate Kirby Milan P. Yager CEO, American Physical Society Executive Director, American Institute for Medical and Biological Engineering Edward T. Morgan President, American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics .