N38wr [Read Now] Oceanic (English Edition) Online
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
SFRA Newsletter 259/260
University of South Florida Scholar Commons Digital Collection - Science Fiction & Fantasy Digital Collection - Science Fiction & Fantasy Publications 12-1-2002 SFRA ewN sletter 259/260 Science Fiction Research Association Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/scifistud_pub Part of the Fiction Commons Scholar Commons Citation Science Fiction Research Association, "SFRA eN wsletter 259/260 " (2002). Digital Collection - Science Fiction & Fantasy Publications. Paper 76. http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/scifistud_pub/76 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Digital Collection - Science Fiction & Fantasy at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Digital Collection - Science Fiction & Fantasy Publications by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. #2Sfl60 SepUlec.JOOJ Coeditors: Chrlis.line "alins Shelley Rodrliao Nonfiction Reviews: Ed "eNnliah. fiction Reviews: PhliUp Snyder I .....HIS ISSUE: The SFRAReview (ISSN 1068- 395X) is published six times a year Notes from the Editors by the Science Fiction Research Christine Mains 2 Association (SFRA) and distributed to SFRA members. Individual issues are not for sale. For information about SFRA Business the SFRA and its benefits, see the New Officers 2 description at the back of this issue. President's Message 2 For a membership application, con tact SFRA Treasurer Dave Mead or Business Meeting 4 get one from the SFRA website: Secretary's Report 1 <www.sfraorg>. 2002 Award Speeches 8 SUBMISSIONS The SFRAReview editors encourage Inverviews submissions, including essays, review John Gregory Betancourt 21 essays that cover several related texts, Michael Stanton 24 and interviews. Please send submis 30 sions or queries to both coeditors. -
Merging with AI Would Be Suicide for the Human Mind
Opinion Artificial intelligence Merging with AI would be suicide for the human mind There may come a moment when the brain is so diminished it is destroyed Your mind is not a back-up drive for AI, even if it has the same memories and exact behaviours © Getty Susan Schneider 54 MINUTES AGO The idea that human and artificial intelligence should merge is in the air these days. The Tesla and SpaceX chief executive Elon Musk, for instance, suggests “having some sort of merger of biological intelligence and machine intelligence”. His company, Neuralink, aims to make implanting chips in the brain as commonplace as laser eye surgery. Underlying all this talk is a radical vision of the mind’s future. Ray Kurzweil, the futurist and director of engineering at Google, envisions a technotopia where human minds upload to the Cloud, becoming hyperconscious, immortal superintelligences. Mr Musk believes people should merge with AI to avoid losing control of superintelligent machines, and prevent technological unemployment. But are such ideas really possible? The philosophical obstacles are as pressing as the technological ones. Here is a new challenge, derived from a story by the Australian science fiction writer Greg Egan. Imagine that an AI device called “a jewel” is inserted into your brain at birth. The jewel monitors your brain’s activity in order to learn how to mimic your thoughts and behaviours. By the time you are an adult, it perfectly simulates your biological brain. At some point, like other members of society, you grow confident that your brain is just redundant meatware. -
Nominations 1
Section of the WSFS Constitution says The complete numerical vote totals including all preliminary tallies for rst second places shall b e made public by the Worldcon Committee within ninety days after the Worldcon During the same p erio d the nomination voting totals shall also b e published including in each category the vote counts for at least the fteen highest votegetters and any other candidate receiving a numb er of votes equal to at least ve p ercent of the nomination ballots cast in that category The Hugo Administrator reports There were valid nominating ballots and invalid nominating ballots There were nal ballots received of which were valid Most of the invalid nal ballots were electronic ballots with errors in voting which were corrected by later resubmission by the memb ers only the last received ballot for each memb er was counted Best Novel 382 nominating ballots cast 65 Brasyl by Ian McDonald 58 The Yiddish Policemens Union by Michael Chab on 58 Rol lback by Rob ert J Sawyer 41 The Last Colony by John Scalzi 40 Halting State by Charles Stross 30 Harry Potter and the Deathly Hal lows by J K Rowling 29 Making Money by Terry Pratchett 29 Axis by Rob ert Charles Wilson 26 Queen of Candesce Book Two of Virga by Karl Schro eder 25 Accidental Time Machine by Jo e Haldeman 25 Mainspring by Jay Lake 25 Hapenny by Jo Walton 21 Ragamun by Tobias Buckell 20 The Prefect by Alastair Reynolds 19 The Name of the Wind by Patrick Rothfuss Best Novella 220 nominating ballots cast 52 Memorare by Gene Wolfe 50 Recovering Ap ollo -
Philosophers' Science Fiction / Speculative Fiction
Philosophers’ Science Fiction / Speculative Fiction Recommendations, Organized by Author / Director November 3, 2014 Eric Schwitzgebel In September and October, 2014, I gathered recommendations of “philosophically interesting” science fiction – or “speculative fiction” (SF), more broadly construed – from thirty-four professional philosophers and from two prominent SF authors with graduate training in philosophy. Each contributor recommended ten works of speculative fiction and wrote a brief “pitch” gesturing toward the interest of the work. Below is the list of recommendations, arranged to highlight the authors and film directors or TV shows who were most often recommended by the list contributors. I have divided the list into (A.) novels, short stories, and other printed media, vs (B.) movies, TV shows, and other non- printed media. Within each category, works are listed by author or director/show, in order of how many different contributors recommended that author or director, and then by chronological order of works for authors and directors/shows with multiple listed works. For works recommended more than once, I have included each contributor’s pitch on a separate line. The most recommended authors were: Recommended by 11 contributors: Ursula K. Le Guin Recommended by 8: Philip K. Dick Recommended by 7: Ted Chiang Greg Egan Recommended by 5: Isaac Asimov Robert A. Heinlein China Miéville Charles Stross Recommended by 4: Jorge Luis Borges Ray Bradbury P. D. James Neal Stephenson Recommended by 3: Edwin Abbott Douglas Adams Margaret -
The (Ir)Relevance of Science Fiction to Non-Binary and Genderqueer
2018, Vol. 15 (1), 51–67(138) Anamarija Šporčič revije.ff.uni-lj.si/elope University of Ljubljana, Slovenia doi: 10.4312/elope.15.1.51-67 UDC: 82.09-311.9:305 The (Ir)Relevance of Science Fiction to Non-Binary and Genderqueer Readers ABSTRACT As an example of Jean Baudrillard’s third order of simulacra, contemporary science fiction represents a convenient literary platform for the exploration of our current and future understanding of gender, gender variants and gender fluidity. The genre should, in theory, have the advantage of being able to avoid the limitations posed by cultural conventions and transcend them in new and original ways. In practice, however, literary works of science fiction that are not subject to the dictations of the binary understanding of gender are few and far between, as authors overwhelmingly use the binary gender division as a binding element between the fictional world and that of the reader. The reversal of gender roles, merging of gender traits, androgynous characters and genderless societies nevertheless began to appear in the 1960s and 1970s. This paper briefly examines the history of attempts at transcending the gender binary in science fiction, and explores the possibility of such writing empowering non-binary/genderqueer individuals. Keywords: gender studies; science fiction; non-binary gender identities; reader response; genderqueer; gender fluidity; gender variants; gendered narrative (I)relevantnost znanstvene fantastike za nebinarno in kvirovsko bralstvo PovzeTEK Sodobna znanstvena fantastika, kot primer Baudrillardovega tretjega reda simulakra, predstavlja prikladno literarno podstat za raziskovanje našega trenutnega in bodočega razumevanja spola, spolne raznolikosti ter fluidnosti. V teoriji ima žanr prednost pred ostalimi, saj ni omejen z druž- benimi in kulturnimi pričakovanji, temveč jih ima možnost presegati na nove in izvirne načine. -
SF Commentarycommentary 80A80A
SFSF CommentaryCommentary 80A80A August 2010 SSCCAANNNNEERRSS 11999900––22000022 Doug Barbour Ditmar (Dick Jenssen) Bruce Gillespie Paul Ewins Alan Stewart SF Commentary 80A August 2010 118 pages Scanners 1990–2002 Edited and published by Bruce Gillespie, 5 Howard Street, Greensborough VIC 3088, Australia as a supplement to SF Commentary 80, The 40th Anniversary Edition, Part 1, also published in August 2010. Email: [email protected] Available only as a PDF from Bill Burns’s site eFanzines.com. Download from http://efanzines.com/SFC/SFC80A.pdf This is an orphan issue, comprising the four ‘Scanners’ columns that were not included in SF Commentary 77, then had to be deleted at the last moment from each of SFCs 78 and 79. Interested readers can find the fifth ‘Scanners’ column, by Colin Steele, in SF Commentary 77 (also downloadable from eFanzines.com). Colin Steele’s column returns in SF Commentary 81. This is the only issue of SF Commentary that will not also be published in a print edition. Those who want print copies of SF Commentary Nos 80, 81 and 82 (the combined 40th Anniversary Edition), should send money ($50, by cheque from Australia or by folding money from overseas), traded fanzines, letters of comment or written or artistic contributions. Thanks to Ditmar (Dick Jenssen) for providing the cover at short notice, as well as his explanatory notes. 2 CONTENTS 5 Ditmar: Dick Jenssen: ‘Alien’: the cover graphic Scanners Books written or edited by the following authors are reviewed by: 7 Bruce Gillespie David Lake :: Macdonald Daly :: Stephen Baxter :: Ian McDonald :: A. -
Chronology of Key Titles in Science Fiction and Developments in Science
Chronology of Key Titles in Science Fiction and Developments in Science c.80 Plutarch, Peri tou prosôpou c.100 Antonius Diogenes, Ta huper Thulên c.170 Lucian, Alêthês Historia 1516 Thomas More, Utopia 1543 Copernicus, De revolutionibus orbium coelestium c.1600 Johannes Kepler’s Somnium written (not published until 1634) 1622 Giovan Battista Marino, L’Adone 1638 William Godwin, The Man in the Moone John Wilkins, The Discovery of a World in the Moone 1644 René Descartes, Principia Philosophiae 1657 Savinien de Cyrano de Bergerac, L’Autre Monde ou les Etats et Empires de la lune (Voyage dans la lune) 1656 Athanasius Kircher, Iter exstaticum coeleste 1659 Jacques Guttin, Epigone, histoire du siècle futur 1665 Robert Hooke, Micrographia 1685 Isaac Newton, ‘De Motu Corporum’ 1686 Bernard de Fontenelle, Entretiens sur la pluralité des mondes 1687 Isaac Newton, Principia Mathematica 1690 Gabriel Daniel, Voyage du Monde de Descartes 1698 Christiaan Huygens, Cosmotheoros 1726 Jonathan Swift, Travels into Several Remote Nations of the World (Gulliver’s Travels) 1730 Voltaire’s Micromégas (published 1750) 1737 Thomas Gray, ‘Luna habitabilis’ 1741 Ludvig Holberg, Nikolai Klimi iter subterraneum 1750 Robert Paltock, The Life and Adventures of Peter Wilkins 1765 Marie-Anne de Roumier, Les Voyages de Milord Ceton dans les sept planettes 1771 Louis Sébastien Mercier, L’An deux mille quatre cent quarante 1781 Nicolas-Edme Restif de la Bretonne, La découverte australe par un homme volant 1798 Thomas Malthus, An Essay on the Principle of Population, as it -
Abstract the Posthuman Can Be Defined As That Condition in Which Humans and Intelligent Technology Are Becoming Increasingly Intertwined
Online International Interdisciplinary Research Journal, {Bi-Monthly}, ISSN 2249-9598, Volume-09, Feb 2019 Special Issue (01) Posthumanism in Greg Egan’s Hard Science Fiction Distress Rajendra Tambile Assistant Professor of English Chhatrapati Shivaji College, Satara, MS, India Abstract The posthuman can be defined as that condition in which humans and intelligent technology are becoming increasingly intertwined. More specifically, the posthuman is a projected state of humanity in which unlocking of the information patterns that those who believe in the posthuman say make us what we are—will shift the focus of humanness from our outward appearance to those information patterns. The posthuman is a speculative being that represents or seeks to re-conceive the human. It is the object of posthumanist criticism, which critically questions humanism, a branch of humanist philosophy which claims that human nature is a universal state from which the human being emerges; human nature is autonomous, rational, capable of free will, and unified in itself as the apex of existence. The posthuman position recognizes imperfectability and disunity within human beings, and understands the world through heterogeneous perspectives while seeking to maintain intellectual rigour and a dedication to objective observations. Key to this posthuman practice is the ability to fluidly change perspectives and manifest oneself through different identities. The transhuman is the project of modifying the human species via any kind of emerging science, including genetic engineering, digital technology, and bioengineering. Transhumanists already use implants to modify their body and seek to also modify human longevity, brain power, and senses. The focus is on using prosthetics and other modifications to enhance, rather than compensate for, normal human functions. -
Breakthrough Propulsion Workshop 2016 Proceedings
Proceedings of the Estes Park Advanced Propulsion Workshop 19 |22 September 2016 Estes Park, Colorado, USA edited by H. Fearn L. L. Williams CSU Fullerton - Physics Konfluence Research Institute i Proceedings of the Estes Park Advanced Propulsion Workshop edited by H. Fearn & L. L. Williams This content in print or digital media is made available in 2016 under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution & ShareAlike 4.0 License (CC BY-SA), https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s), the title, and the name of this Proceedings. For the papers written by James Woodward, Jos´eRodal and Gary Hudson the following restrictions apply: No derivatives allowed, the paper must be republished as is, in the original form. Any republication must have prior permission of the authors and indicate the original publication in the Space Studies Institute version of the proceedings. Space Studies Institute, Inc. Press Mojave, California. ii Dedicated to JAMES F. WOODWARD on the occasion of his seventy-fifth birthday iii ESTES PARK ADVANCED PROPULSION WORKSHOP Held at the YMCA of the Rockies Estes Park, Colorado USA 19 {22 September 2016 Organizing and Technical Committee: H. FEARN (Cal. State Univ. Fullerton { Physics) L.L. WILLIAMS (Konfluence Research Institute) J.F. WOODWARD (Cal. State Univ. Fullerton { Physics) Workshop Production: R. SMITH (audio) R. SNELSON (video) H. FEARN (moderator) L.L. WILLIAMS (moderator) & YMCA of the ROCKIES staff Workshop Sponsorship: The Space -
Whole Brain Emulation a Roadmap
Whole Brain Emulation A Roadmap (2008) Technical Report #2008‐3 Anders Sandberg* Nick Bostrom Future of Humanity Institute Faculty of Philosophy & James Martin 21st Century School Oxford University CITE: Sandberg, A. & Bostrom, N. (2008): Whole Brain Emulation: A Roadmap, Technical Report #2008‐3, Future of Humanity Institute, Oxford University URL: www.fhi.ox.ac.uk/reports/2008‐3.pdf (*) Corresponding author: [email protected] In memoriam: Bruce H. McCormick (1930 – 2007) 2 Contents Whole Brain Emulation............................................................................................................................1 A Roadmap ................................................................................................................................................1 In memoriam: Bruce H. McCormick (1930 – 2007)...........................................................................2 Contents..................................................................................................................................................3 Introduction ...........................................................................................................................................5 Thanks to............................................................................................................................................6 The concept of brain emulation..........................................................................................................7 Emulation and simulation...............................................................................................................7 -
2008 Hugo Awards and John W. Campbell Award Ballot
2008 Hugo Awards and John W. Campbell Award Ballot Please Read These Instructions Carefully Before Casting Your Hugo Ballot Eligibility to Vote Only attending and supporting members of Denvention 3 are eligible to vote. You must include your name, address, membership number (if known), and signature in the appropriate spaces on this ballot. Please print or type. If you are not already a Denvention 3 member, you may purchase a membership by completing the form on the next page and enclosing payment for the membership fee. If you are already a member, do not send money with your ballot. Deadline All ballots must be received by midnight (2400 hrs.) Pacific Daylight Time at the end of Monday, July 7, 2008.Please vote as early as possible. Put the ballot in an envelope and mail to: Hugo Awards Administrator 1463 East Republican #173 Seattle, WA 98112-4517 USA Overseas members should send their ballots airmail. Do not mail your ballots to the main Denvention address, as this will delay them and they may not be counted. Remember, you must complete AND SIGN the eligibility section for your ballot to be valid. Questions may be addressed to [email protected]. Ballots may be cast electronically via the Denvention 3 web site at www.denvention.org/hugos/08hugofinalballot.php. Your member PIN is required for electronic voting. A downloadable Adobe Acrobat PDF version may be found on our web site. You may also fax your ballot to +1-206-323-0795. How to Vote This ballot uses a modified version of the Alternate Vote System, sometimes known as the Instant Runoff Ballot. -
DARREN JORGENSEN What and Why
EnterText 6.3 DARREN JORGENSEN What and Why was Postcyberpunk? Greg Egan and Bruce Sterling in the 1990s In 1998, Lawrence Person coined the term postcyberpunk to describe a form of science fiction writing that had appeared in the previous decade.1 That cyberpunk is largely associated with the 1980s is convenient for historians of the genre, as the distinction between it and postcyberpunk has to do with shifts in decades, the change from one generation of writers and readers to another. Yet there is more to generic transitions than the passage of time. They can also be explained historically and, in the case of science fiction, explained as an effect of the history of technology. If in the 1980s such terms as the virtual and cyberspace looked to a future that had not yet come about, by the 1990s these words had acquired a certain materiality. It is amidst this materialisation of the future that postcyberpunk intervenes, its historical and technological conditions of production those that cyberpunk foresaw to some extent. If the early cyberpunk novels were composed on typewriters and imagined a future dominated by computers, by the 1990s computing had become an everyday technology. Not only digital but biological technology had become a marketable reality in the 1990s, and it is with these in mind that I want to look at the postcyberpunk novels of Bruce Sterling and Greg Egan, in order to Darren Jorgensen: What and Why was Postcyberpunk? 229 EnterText 6.3 take Person’s claims for a new kind of fiction seriously, and to supplement his observations with the techno-historical specificity of the 1990s.