DOCSLIB.ORG

Orient/East-Med Core Network Corridor Study

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Orient/East-Med Core Network Corridor Study Orient/East-Med Core Network Corridor Study Final Report December 2014 mmmll Study on Orient / East-Med TEN-T Core Network Corridor, Final Report Disclaimer The information and views set out in this Report are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the Commission. The Commission does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this study. Neither the Commission nor any person acting on the Commission’s behalf may be held responsible for any potential use which may be made of the information contained therein. Table of content Disclaimer ........................................................................................................ 2 Table of content ................................................................................................ 2 Figures ............................................................................................................. 4 Tables .............................................................................................................. 6 Abbreviations .................................................................................................... 9 1 Information on the Study .............................................................................11 1.1 Consortium information .........................................................................11 1.2 Background .........................................................................................12 1.3 Corridor Forum ....................................................................................12 1.3.1 Corridor Forum Meeting 1/2014 .......................................................12 1.3.2 Corridor Forum Meeting 2/2014 .......................................................13 1.3.3 Corridor Forum Meeting 3/2014 .......................................................13 1.3.4 Corridor Forum Meeting 4/2014 .......................................................14 1.4 Content and Structure of the Report .......................................................15 1.5 Data Collection .....................................................................................18 2 Identification of Stakeholders .......................................................................19 2.1 Background / Methodology ....................................................................19 2.2 Rail Sector (incl. ERTMS) .......................................................................21 2.3 Inland Waterway Sector and River ports ..................................................21 2.4 Maritime Sector and Seaports ports ........................................................21 2.5 Road Sector .........................................................................................22 2.6 Road-Rail Terminals ..............................................................................22 2.7 Airports and air transport sector .............................................................22 2.8 Administrative sector (national, regional, local) ........................................23 2.9 Civil Society .........................................................................................23 3 Review of Studies and relevant documents .....................................................24 3.1 Categorization of Studies and Documents ................................................24 3.2 Complete List of Studies and Documents reviewed ...................................26 3.2.1 Studies related to the TEN-T Priority Projects .....................................26 3.2.2 The Connecting Europe Facility ........................................................29 3.2.3 The National Transport Masterplans ..................................................31 3.3 Description of most important corridor related studies ..............................35 3.4 Additional information sources ...............................................................36 3.5 Findings of the Study Review .................................................................36 3.5.1 Procedure ......................................................................................36 3.5.2 Findings ........................................................................................37 4 Elements of the Work Plan - Summary...........................................................38 4.1 The Orient/East Med Corridor Alignment (Summary of 5.1) .......................38 4.2 The OEM Railways Network and Rail Road Terminals (Summary of 5.2.1 and 5.2.2) 39 4.3 The OEM IWW Network and the Ports (Summary of 5.2.3 and 5.2.4) ..........41 4.4 The OEM Maritime Infrastructure and the MoS (Summary of 5.2.5) ............42 4.5 The OEM Road Infrastructure (Summary of 5.2.6) ....................................43 4.6 The OEM Air Transport Infrastructure (Summary of 5.2.7) .........................45 December 2014 2 Study on Orient / East-Med TEN-T Core Network Corridor, Final Report 4.7 Overview on non-compliant infrastructure on OEM corridor ........................45 4.8 The Multimodal Transport Market Study (Summary of 5.3) ........................47 4.9 The Critical Issues (Summary of 5.4) ......................................................53 4.10 The Objectives of the Corridor (Summary of chapter 6) .............................54 4.11 The List of Projects and the Implementation Plan (Summary of chapter 7.1) 54 4.12 The ERTMS deployment along the Orient/East Med (Summary of 7.2.1) ......56 4.13 The RIS Deployment Plan (Summary of 7.2.2) .........................................58 4.14 Other Elements (Resilience, Environmental Issues – Summary of 7.3) ........58 5 Characteristics of the Corridor ......................................................................59 5.1 Alignment of the Orient/East-Med Corridor ..............................................59 5.1.1 Alignment .....................................................................................59 5.1.2 Statistical Information on the Corridor ..............................................62 5.1.3 Core Network Nodes of the Orient/East Med Corridor ..........................63 5.1.4 TEN-T Priority Projects and other initiatives along the Corridor .............67 5.1.5 Corridor sections belonging to several corridor studies/consortia ..........68 5.2 Description of the Technical Parameters of the Corridor Infrastructure ........69 5.2.1 Corridor rail infrastructure ...............................................................69 5.2.2 Rail Road Terminals ........................................................................81 5.2.3 Corridor inland waterway infrastructure ............................................84 5.2.4 Inland Ports ...................................................................................97 5.2.5 Maritime Transport: Ports and Motorways of the Sea ........................ 101 5.2.6 Corridor road infrastructure ........................................................... 109 5.2.7 Corridor airport infrastructure ........................................................ 123 5.3 Multimodal Transport Market Study ...................................................... 126 5.3.1 Introduction ................................................................................ 126 5.3.2 MTMS process .............................................................................. 128 5.3.3 Socio-economic characteristics of the OEM corridor on the basis of GDP and Population .......................................................................................... 129 5.3.4 Socio-economic characteristics of the corridor on the basis of GDP and Population as reported by the countries ....................................................... 142 5.3.5 The national transport volumes and demand scenarios ..................... 147 5.3.6 Transport description of the OEM corridor in 2010 ............................ 156 5.3.7 Integrated freight transport demand scenarios ................................. 164 5.3.8 Integrated passenger transport demand scenarios ........................... 177 5.3.9 Expected modal split effects of TEN-T compliance ............................. 178 5.3.10 Supply side and capacity analysis ................................................... 182 5.4 Critical Issues for the Core Network Corridor ......................................... 187 5.4.1 Scope ......................................................................................... 187 5.4.2 Inland waterways ......................................................................... 188 5.4.3 Rail: cross border sections ............................................................. 189 5.4.4 Ports .......................................................................................... 192 5.4.5 Horizontal issues .......................................................................... 193 5.4.6 Projects addressing Critical issues / Open Issues .............................. 194 6 Objectives of the Core Network Corridor ...................................................... 195 6.1 Scope ............................................................................................... 195 6.2 General and specific objectives ............................................................ 195 6.3 Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) ....................................................... 200 7 Implementation ........................................................................................ 203 7.1 Plan for the removal of barriers and to enhance efficient multimodality (Implementation
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Nominations of Gen. Paul Selva, TRANSCOM, and VADM Michael S. Rogers, CYBERCOM
    S. HRG. 113–611 NOMINATIONS BEFORE THE SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE, SEC- OND SESSION, 113TH CONGRESS HEARINGS BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED THIRTEENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION ON NOMINATIONS OF HON. MADELYN R. CREEDON; HON. BRAD R. CARSON; DR. WILLIAM A. LaPLANTE, JR.; HON. ROBERT O. WORK; HON. MICHAEL J. McCORD; MS. CHRISTINE E. WORMUTH; MR. BRIAN P. McKEON; HON. DAVID B. SHEAR; MR. ERIC ROSENBACH; GEN. PAUL J. SELVA, USAF; VADM MI- CHAEL S. ROGERS, USN; DR. LAURA J. JUNOR; MR. GORDON O. TAN- NER; MS. DEBRA S. WADA; MS. MIRANDA A.A. BALLENTINE; DR. MONICA C. REGALBUTO; ADM WILLIAM E. GORTNEY, USN; GEN JOHN F. CAMPBELL, USA; LTG JOSEPH L. VOTEL, USA; GEN. JOSEPH F. DUNFORD, JR., USMC; MR. ROBERT M. SCHER; MS. ELISSA SLOTKIN; MR. DAVID J. BERTEAU; MS. ALISSA M. STARZAK; AND ADM HARRY B. HARRIS, JR., USN JANUARY 16; FEBRUARY 25; MARCH 11; JUNE 19; JULY 10, 17; DECEMBER 2, 2014 Printed for the use of the Committee on Armed Services ( VerDate Nov 24 2008 15:23 Mar 31, 2015 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6011 Sfmt 6011 Z:\DOCS\93919.TXT JUNE NOMINATIONS OF GEN. PAUL J. SELVA, USAF, FOR REAPPOINTMENT TO THE GRADE OF GENERAL AND TO BE COMMANDER, U.S. TRANSPORTATION COMMAND; AND VADM MICHAEL S. ROGERS, USN, TO BE ADMIRAL AND DIRECTOR, NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY/CHIEF, CENTRAL SECURITY SERV- ICES/COMMANDER, U.S. CYBER COMMAND TUESDAY, MARCH 11, 2014 U.S. SENATE, COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES, Washington, DC. The committee met, pursuant to notice, at 9:37 a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Mb60 Manzke.Pdf (6.564
    Article, Published Version Manzke, Diethardt Erd- und grundbauliche Beratung beim Bau des Elbeseitenkanals Mitteilungsblatt der Bundesanstalt für Wasserbau Verfügbar unter/Available at: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11970/102883 Vorgeschlagene Zitierweise/Suggested citation: Manzke, Diethardt (1987): Erd- und grundbauliche Beratung beim Bau des Elbeseitenkanals. In: Mitteilungsblatt der Bundesanstalt für Wasserbau 60. Karlsruhe: Bundesanstalt für Wasserbau. S. 115-130. Standardnutzungsbedingungen/Terms of Use: Die Dokumente in HENRY stehen unter der Creative Commons Lizenz CC BY 4.0, sofern keine abweichenden Nutzungsbedingungen getroffen wurden. Damit ist sowohl die kommerzielle Nutzung als auch das Teilen, die Weiterbearbeitung und Speicherung erlaubt. Das Verwenden und das Bearbeiten stehen unter der Bedingung der Namensnennung. Im Einzelfall kann eine restriktivere Lizenz gelten; dann gelten abweichend von den obigen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. Documents in HENRY are made available under the Creative Commons License CC BY 4.0, if no other license is applicable. Under CC BY 4.0 commercial use and sharing, remixing, transforming, and building upon the material of the work is permitted. In some cases a different, more restrictive license may apply; if applicable the terms of the restrictive license will be binding. Dipl.-Ing. Diethardt M a n z k e ERD- UND GRUNDBAULICHE BERATUNG BEIM BAU DES ELBESEITENKANALS Consultation on earthwork and foundation practice during the construction of the Elbe Lateral Canal Diethardt Manzke, Dipl.-Ing., Wissen­ schaftlicher Angestellter in der Bundes­ anstalt für Wasserbau (BAW). Geboren 1935. Studium des Bauingenieur­ wesens an der Technischen Hochschule Braunschweig von 1956 bis 1964. Seit 1966 in der Bundesanstalt für Wasserbau Außenstelle Küste und dort Sachbearbei-' ter im Referat Erd- ·und Grundbau.
    [Show full text]
  • Connection Between Inland Water Development And
    Carpathian Journal of Earth and Environmental Sciences, February 2016, Vol. 11, No. 1, p. 293 - 301 CONNECTION BETWEEN INLAND EXCESS WATER DEVELOPMENT AND MOTORWAYS Károly BARTA1, József SZATMÁRI1 & Ádám POSTA2 1Department of Physical Geography and Geoinformatics, University of Szeged, 2-6 Egyetem Street, Szeged 6720 Hungary, [email protected] 2Department of Social and Human Geography, University of Szeged, 2-6 Egyetem Street, Szeged 6720 Hungary Abstract: It has been known for a long time that linear infrastructures (railways, roads, embankments) significantly influence surface and subsurface horizontal water movements. Clear evidence can be observed at places where oxbows and abandoned meanders are crossed by roads, while the effect can hardly be shown at lowlands free from linear water drainage forms. This research seeks to answer the question of whether the motorways opened in the last 10 years around Szeged, SE Hungary (M5, M43), have any role in the appearance of extended patterns of inland excess water along certain sections of the motorways. The infiltration conditions of two selected sample sites were determined by soil and geodetic studies and it was also possible to determine the elevation of the groundwater level. The analysis of results underlines the significant effect of linear infrastructures. Inland excess water patterns along the studied highway sections are caused by the motorway M43. Keywords: inland excess water, motorway, groundwater movement, anthropogenic effects, soil compaction 1. INTRODUCTION as being lowest-risk areas on the maps of inland excess water risk and inundation frequency (Bozán The natural drainage networks and et al., 2008; Kozák, 2008; Körösparti et al., 2009; hydrological systems are seriously influenced by Pásztor et al., 2009).
    [Show full text]
  • OCIMF Report Template BIQ5 - Europe
    OCIMF Report Template BIQ5 - Europe 2204 5.0.10 2204 5.0.10 BIQ5 - Europe General particulars General particulars 1.1 Vessel Variant [SireText] 1.2 Is the inspected vessel subject to European Regulations? [SireYesNo] If yes, state to which regulations the barge is subject. 1.3 Name of Vessel [SireText] If operating in a tug/vessel combination record name of other vessel. Prefixes (MT, MV, SS etc.) must not be entered unless the prefix is actually a part of the registered name of the vessel. The name must be entered exactly as it appears on the Certificate of Registry or equivalent. 1.4 IMO number [SireText] If an IMO number has not been assigned, check the box "Not applicable". 1.5 ENI Number [SireText] If an ENI number has not been assigned, check the box "Not applicable". 1.6 Official Number or Vessel Identification Number (VIN) [SireText] If an Official Number, Vessel Identification Number (VIN) 1.7 Date of the inspection [SireDate] If the inspection falls into two or more days for any reason the date shall be the date of completion of the Inspection. 1.8 Place of the inspection [SireText] Describe in comments the location where inspection is taking place. I.e. Port name, terminal name, berth name etc. 1.9 Geographic region where the vessel normally trades [SireText] 1.10 Flag [SireLookup] If a change of flag has occurred in the past 6 months record date of change of Flag and previous flag in comments. 1.11 Deadweight Tonnage [SireDecimal] Record deadweight in metric tonnes. If no Deadweight Tonnage assigned mark question 'NA' 1.12 Maximum Tonnage [SireDecimal] Record maximum tonnage in metric tonnes.
    [Show full text]
  • Officialjournal
    Official Journal of the European Communities Volume 16 No L 339 8 December 1973 English Edition Legislation Contents I Acts whose publication is obligatory Regulation ( EEC ) No 3307/73 of the Commission of 7 December 1973 fixing the import levies on cereals and on wheat or rye flour, groats and meal 1 Regulation ( EEC ) No 3308/73 of the Commission of 7 December 1973 fixing the premiums to be added to the import levies on cereals, flour and malt 3 Regulation ( EEC ) No 3309/73 of the Commission of 7 December 1973 altering the corrective amount applicable to the refund on cereals 5 Regulation ( EEC ) No 3310/73 of the Commission of 7 December 1973 fixing the import levies on white sugar and raw sugar 7 Regulation ( EEC) No 3311/73 of the Commission of 7 December 1973 fixing the export levies on starch products 8 Regulation ( EEC ) No 3312/73 of the Commission of 7 December 1973 fixing the amount of the subsidy on oil seeds 10 Regulation ( EEC ) No 3313/73 of the Commission of 7 December 1973 determining the world market price for colza and rape seed 12 Regulation ( EEC ) No 3314/73 of the Commission of 7 December 1973 fixing the export levies on olive oil 14 Regulation ( EEC ) No 3315/73 of the Commission of 6 December 1973 re-establi­ shing Common Customs Tariff duties on sheep- and lamb-skin leather, falling within subheading No 41.03 B II, originating in developing countries to which the preferential tariff arrangements set out in Council Regulation (EEC ) No 2762/72 of 19 December 1972 apply 16 Regulation ( EEC ) No 3316/73 of the
    [Show full text]
  • Tariff Regulations for Inland Shipping
    Tariff regulations for inland shipping FREE TRANSLATION – Only the Dutch version is legally valid Antwerp Port Authority www.portofantwerp.com Board of Directors of the 10th of December 2018 Date of commencement : 1st of January 2019 Index Basic principles .................................................................................................................. 6 ARTICLE 1 Nomenclature ......................................................................................... 6 1.1 Dredging vessels ............................................................................................ 6 1.2 Destination ..................................................................................................... 6 1.3 Inland shipping dues ...................................................................................... 6 1.4 Inland vessels ................................................................................................. 6 1.5 Bunker vessels ............................................................................................... 6 1.6 Bunker vessels type N ................................................................................... 6 1.7 Container ships .............................................................................................. 7 1.8 Passage fee .................................................................................................... 7 1.9 Push barges .................................................................................................... 7 1.10 Pushers ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the First Half
    Report on the First Half of 2005 Mission Eni is one of the most important integrated energy companies in the world operating in the oil and gas, power generation, petrochemicals, oilfield services construction and engineering industries. In these businesses it has a strong edge and leading international market positions. Eni’s objective is to create new value to meet its shareholders expectations through the continuous improvement of cost efficiency and the quality of its products and services and through the attention to the needs of its employees and the commitment to a sustainable growth pattern also encompassing the careful assessment of the environmental impact of its activities and the development of innovative and efficient technologies. To achieve this objective Eni relies on the managerial and technical capabilities as well as the continuous development of its workforce, and on an increasingly lean and entrepreneurial organization. BOARD OF DIRECTORS (1) BOARD OF STATUTORY AUDITORS (7) Chairman Chairman Roberto Poli (2) Paolo Andrea Colombo Managing Director Statutory Auditors Paolo Scaroni (3) Filippo Duodo, Edoardo Grisolia, Riccardo Perotta, Directors Giorgio Silva Alberto Clô, Renzo Costi, Dario Fruscio, Alternate Auditors Marco Pinto, Marco Reboa, Francesco Bilotti, Massimo Gentile Mario Resca, Pierluigi Scibetta MAGISTRATE OF THE COURT OF ACCOUNTS DELEGATED TO THE CONTROL OF ENI SpA’S GENERAL MANAGERS FINANCE ACCOUNTING Exploration & Production Division Luigi Schiavello (8) (4) Stefano Cao Alternate Gas & Power Division Angelo Antonio Parente (9) Luciano Sgubini (5) Refining & Marketing Division External Auditors (10) Angelo Taraborelli (6) PricewaterhouseCoopers SpA The composition and powers of the Internal Control Committee, (5) Appointed by the Board of Directors on January 30, 2001 Compensation Committee and International Oil Committee are presented (6) Appointed by the Board of Directors on April 14, 2004 (7) Appointed by the Shareholders’ Meeting held on May 27, 2005 in the “Other Information” section of the Report of the Directors.
    [Show full text]
  • Labour Market Comparison
    Effective Cross-border Co-operation for Development of Employment Growths in Arad and Békés County – Labour Market Comparison 2019 ROHU 406: CROSSGROWING Effective cross-border co-operation for development of employment growths in Arad and Békés County Békés County Foundation for Enterprise Development The content of this study does not necessarily represent the official position of the European Union. The project was implemented under the Interreg V-A Romania-Hungary Programme, and is financed by the European Union through the European Regional Development Fund, Romania and Hungary. Copyright © 2019 BMVA. All rights reserved. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................... 5 2. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................... 14 3. CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FOR RESEARCH ........................................... 19 3.1. The labour market as an area of intervention ....................................................... 19 3.1.1. Production factors, supply and demand in the labour market ....................... 21 3.1.2. Unemployment and labour shortages ............................................................ 25 3.1.3. Employment and employment policy .............................................................. 31 3.2. System of cross-border cooperation ..................................................................... 37 3.2.1. Theories and principles of cross-border cooperation ...................................
    [Show full text]
  • Savanewsflash Official Bulletin of the ISRBC No.8/December 2011
    SAVANewsFlash official bulletin of the ISRBC no.8/December 2011 Keeping the Pace of the FASRB Implementation Toward Achieving the EU WFD Environmental Objectives in the SRB Advanced Technological Solutions for a Higher Navigation Safety Fostering Contribution of the SME Sector to Sustainable Development of the SRB Official bulletin of the ISRBC CONTENT I Content 2 II Sava is a Common Development Opportunity 3 III Keeping the Pace of the FASRB Implementation 4 Strengthening the Trans-regional Cooperation: IV Central Commission for the Navigation on the Rhine 5 Toward Achieving the EU WFD V Environmental Objectives in the SRB 6 VI Why We Need Protected Areas Along the Sava River? 9 Advanced Technological Solutions for a Higher VII Navigation Safety 11 Development of River Information Services VIII on the Sava in Serbia 12 Fostering Contribution of the SME Sector to Sustainable IX Development of the SRB 14 X Events – Reports and Announcements 15 Photo: Ivica Brlić - Winter idyll SAVANewsFlash Sava is a COmmon DEvElopment OpporTunity On 3 December 2002, the Ministers of Foreign Affairs the use of renewable sources, of the Sava countries signed the Framework Agreement and improving accessibility on the Sava River Basin (FASRB), the main objectives of and connectivity of the re- which are: gion with the cross-border 1. Establishment of the international navigation regime infrastructure. The most im- on the Sava River and its navigable tributaries; portant are the intermodal road, railway and waterway 2. Establishment of sustainable water management; connections. The vision to 3. Adoption of measures to prevent hazards and to set up a cycling path from mitigate and eliminate the negative effects of floods, the source to the mouth of droughts and pollution.
    [Show full text]
  • Alteon VA for AWS Getting Started Guide
    ALTEON VA FOR AMAZON WEB SERVICES GETTING STARTED GUIDE Document ID: RDWR-ALOS-AMZ_GSG2009 September 2020 Alteon Alteon VA for Amazon Web Services Getting Started Guide 2 Document ID: RDWR-ALOS-AMZ_GSG2009 Alteon Alteon VA for Amazon Web Services Getting Started Guide Important Notices The following important notices are presented in English, French, and German. Important Notices This guide is delivered subject to the following conditions and restrictions: The AppShape++ Script Files provided by Radware Ltd. are subject to the Special License Terms included in each of the electronic AppShape++ Script Files and are also subject to Radware's End User License Agreement, a copy of which (as may be amended from time to time) can be found at the end of this document or at http://www.radware.com/Resources/eula.html. Please note that if you create your own scripts using any AppShape++ Scripts provided by Radware, such self-created scripts are not controlled by Radware and therefore Radware will not be liable for any malfunctions resulting from such self-created scripts. Copyright Radware Ltd. 2020. All rights reserved. The copyright and all other intellectual property rights and trade secrets included in this guide are owned by Radware Ltd. The guide is provided to Radware customers for the sole purpose of obtaining information with respect to the installation and use of the Radware products described in this document, and may not be used for any other purpose. The information contained in this guide is proprietary to Radware and must be kept in strict confidence. It is strictly forbidden to copy, duplicate, reproduce or disclose this guide or any part thereof without the prior written consent of Radware.
    [Show full text]
  • United Nations ECE/TRANS/SC.3/WP.3/88
    United Nations ECE/TRANS/SC.3/WP.3/88 Economic and Social Council Distr.: General 11 March 2014 English Original: English and French Economic Commission for Europe Inland Transport Committee Working Party on Inland Water Transport Working Party on the Standardization of Technical and Safety Requirements in Inland Navigation Forty-fourth session Geneva, 12–14 February 2014 Report of the Working Party on the Standardization of Technical and Safety Requirements in Inland Navigation Contents Paragraphs Page I. Attendance............................................................................................................... 1–4 4 II. Adoption of the agenda (agenda item 1). ................................................................ 5–6 4 III. Election of officers (agenda item 2) ........................................................................ 7 5 IV. Results of the fifty-seventh session of the Working Party on Inland Water Transport (agenda item 3) ................................................................. 8–11 5 V. Inland waterway infrastructure (agenda item 4) ...................................................... 12–24 5 A. European Agreement on Main Inland Waterways of International Importance (AGN)..................................................................... 12–17 5 B. Inventory of Main Standards and Parameters of the E Waterway Network (“Blue Book”) ............................................................. 18–21 6 C. Improving the role of inland water transport in secure intermodal transport chains
    [Show full text]
  • Hamburg Is Staying on Course the PORT DEVELOPMENT PLAN 2025 TO
    Map of the Port ofHamburg Map ofthePort HAMBURG IS STAYING ON COURSE THE PORT DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO 2025 is staying on Course isstaying Hamburg THE PORT PLAN DEVELOPMENT 2025 TO J LEGAL NOTICE Published by: Free and Hanseatic City of Hamburg – State Ministry of Economic Affairs, Transport and Innovation Hamburg Port Authority Enquiries to: Hamburg Port Authority Neuer Wandrahm 4 · 20457 Hamburg Germany E-mail: [email protected] You can download this document online at: www.hamburg-port-authority.de Concept, Infographics and Design: Havas PR Hamburg GmbH Photos: HPA image archive, www.mediaserver.hamburg.de/C.Spahrbier Map on the back cover: HPA cartography October 2012 Hamburg is staying on Course The Port Development Plan to 2025 2 Content Senator’s Foreword .................................................................................... 4 Port Development Based on Dialogue .................................................... 6 Strategic Guidelines ................................................................................... 7 The Port of Hamburg: Site Indicators ................................. 8 Sharpening the Profile of the Port ....................................... 29 The Macro-Economic Importance of the Port of Hamburg ................. 8 Focus on Growing Markets and Regions .............................................. 29 The Port as the Heart of Maritime Trade ........................................ 8 Hamburg’s Position in Intercontinental Trade .............................. 29 Port-Related Value Creation ..........................................................
    [Show full text]