DOCSLIB.ORG

ALH Online Review, Series XXII 1 David S. Koffman, the Jews' Indian

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ALH Online Review, Series XXII 1 David S. Koffman, the Jews' Indian ALH Online Review, Series XXII 1 David S. Koffman, The Jews’ Indian: Colonialism, Pluralism, and Belonging in America (New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 2019), 276 pp. Reviewed by Cristina Stanciu, Virginia Commonwealth University David S. Koffman’s The Jews’ Indian: Colonialism, Pluralism, and Belonging in America is a timely and necessary study about Jewish encounters with Native Americans on various historical and cultural scenes in North America. According to Koffman, although some Jewish immigrants and later generations of Jewish Americans at times identified with Indians, ultimately many distanced themselves from Indians to stake claim to their own (precarious) position in America. In doing so, they became “powerful agents of empire” and beneficiaries of settler colonial privileges (whiteness, citizenship, acquisition of acquisition); as such, Jews imagined themselves between “red” and “white,” both resisting and participating in the colonial project aimed at the elimination of the Native population and the acquisition of lands (7). The title of Koffman’s book is a nod to Robert F. Berkhofer’s exemplary The White Man’s Indian: Images of the American Indian from Columbus to the Present (1979). Koffman’s excellent, ambitious, and ground-breaking study is organized both chronologically and thematically, by juxtaposing Jewish attitudes and behaviors toward Native Americans over 150 years. The first half examines such manifestations during the Indian wars, the Indian Removal, all the way up to the (Dawes) Allotment Act (1887) and the Assimilation Era (1880-1920). The second half considers a different group of American Jews, during the Indian New Deal (1930s) and the Termination Era (1940-1960), who advocated for Native rights and distanced themselves from the colonial project. Showing how Jews generally benefited from whiteness in North America, Koffman offers several distinctive categories of Jewish interaction with Native Americans, both in the US and Canada, setting them apart from other white groups in terms of sex, religion, and land acquisition. Jewish men, Koffman explains, tended not to sexualize Native women; unlike Christian immigrants, Jews did not proselytize to Native communities; most importantly, he finds that Jews had little interest in acquiring rural land. All these (otherwise) important differences aside, American Jews used their whiteness strategically. The Jews’ Indian begins by clarifying both the rhetorical and practical “uses” Jews made of Native people. They include nineteenth-century affirmations of ancient ties of kinship with Native Americans (“the lost tribes of Israel”), later disavowals of Native people and distancing from what they perceived to be a group of outsiders to the emerging American nation, still later ventriloquism of Native voices in late nineteenth century. Mid-twentieth-century purposes further included renewed affirmations of © The Author 2020. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: [email protected] 2 ALH Online Review, Series XXII Jewish-Native solidarity and cultural pluralism, as well as post-World War II Native- Jewish dialogue on such issues of mutual interest as the environment, religious identity, music, creation stories, and youth education. Despite these points of convergence, we learn that “Indians” remained “precarious outsiders” to Jews and their negotiations of their own positions in relation to the white, Christian, settler US of the late nineteenth and early twentieth century, and as they worked through “modern, western, masculine, and Jewish anxieties” (4). If Jews viewed Native Americans as impediments to Western settlement in the age of empire, Koffman shows, they turned to Indian alterity and identified with Native concerns by the middle of the twentieth century, replacing previous settler claims with cultural pluralist framings of ethnic identity. Thus, the American Jews who identified with Native Americans criticized US racism and imperialism, and brought concerns of ethnic difference and ethical responsibility to the fore. In the first chapter of this elegantly written and erudite study, “Inventing Pioneer Jews in the New Nation’s New West,” Koffman sets out to reveal how early Jewish immigrants and American-born Jews construed Indians as they negotiated their own position on the rural borders of America. In this context, “Indians” served as foils to both Jewish and American identity formation; Jews also became “honorary Indians” in their claims to fictional bonds of kinship with Native Americans (including the Lost Tribes claims), which brought them closer to the American self. Unlike Native Americans in the West, Jews enjoyed the material rewards and a sense of social inclusion granted by their whiteness, which also led to their political enfranchisement. The next chapter, “Land and the Violent Expansion of the Immigrants’ Empire,” tellingly reveals Jewish participation in settler forms of domination, which at times included violence against Native Americans. As immigrants, Jews thus participated in the expansion of “an immigrants’ empire” (15). For instance, Koffman explains how the Jewish press criticized US imperialism while framing stories about “Indians” in colonial terms and generally siding with the settlers. Jews thus benefited from “the metaphysical power that came with being a colonizer” (81). Chapter 3, “Jewish Middlemen Merchants, Indian Curios, and the Extensions of American Capitalism,” examines economic encounters between Native Americans and Jews through the case study of the Jewish dealers in Indian “curios,” revealing the economic ambitions of Western Jews on the American frontier and how they profited from their use of Native alliances. These Jews, Koffman avers, helped to advance mercantile capitalism and the commodification of Native cultures. In the process, they also “helped invent a new heritage industry” on which Americans still thrive (111). In Koffman’s particularly relevant and well-written fourth chapter, “Nativist Anxieties Twinned: Jewish Rhetorical Uses of Indians in an Era of Anti-Immigration Sentiment,” © The Author 2020. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: [email protected] ALH Online Review, Series XXII 3 he moves from the West to the East Coast and explores how Jews aimed to rectify some of the damage of the previous century’s colonial encounters. As nativist anxieties targeted immigrant groups and the country moved toward the moment of a first major immigration legislation in 1924 (the National Origins Act), Jewish responses to xenophobia used Indians rhetorically to build alliances against Anglo-Saxon threats of cultural obliteration. Chapters 5 and 6 (“Jewish Advocacy for Native Americans on and off Capitol Hill” and “Anthropological Ventriloquism and Dovetailing Intellectual and Political Advancements”) concentrate on two forms of Jewish advocacy on behalf of Native Americans during the Indian New Deal, a federal program meant to revitalize Native cultures and to invigorate Native political autonomy. Koffman reveals how a group of Jewish bureaucrats, lawyers, and philanthropists—including William Zimmerman, Nathan Margold, and Felix Cohen—worked tirelessly on behalf of Native American nations by building the infrastructure and intellectual groundwork for the Red Power movement, which flourished after World War II (under Native leadership). Jewish activism on behalf of minority rights and cultural autonomy, Koffman argues, was simply put, “good for the Jews” (18). Besides bureaucrats and lawyers, Jewish anthropologists also took an interest in Native communities and contributed to major shifts in race thinking, advancing cultural pluralism and relativism. From German Jewish father of anthropology, Franz Boas, to Edward Sapir, Paul Radin, and Ruth Leah Bunzel, Jewish anthropologists tried to salvage, collect, and preserve Indigenous cultures. In their effort, these scholars acted as cultural mediators between Indians and whites. Throughout the 1930s to the 1950s, according to Koffman, these concerns had a double focus: progressive advocacy for other disenfranchised groups and advocacy for Jewish enfranchisement. The Jews’s Indian concludes with an inspiring section, “Paths of Persecution, Stakes of Colonial Modernity.” Here Koffman provides a timely framework for assessing late twentieth-century encounters between Native Americans and American Jews, which necessarily entails examining both the continuities (mid-nineteenth to mid-twentieth century) and discontinuities (post-World War II, post-Holocaust, and after the formation of the State of Israel) of Native-Jewish encounters. This gesture “highlights the tensions and ambivalence at the heart of discussions about Jews as the victims of colonialism in European modernity, as the perpetrators of colonialism [in America], and eventually, as seekers of redress for America’s colonial sins” (18). Among the merits of this short chapter is its description of the most common threads Jews have identified and used in relation to Native Americans: genocide and sovereignty, a focus that reveals not only tensions and disagreements over comparative genocide debates but also productive articulations of “shared parallel histories of persecution, resistance, and © The Author 2020. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: [email protected] 4 ALH Online Review, Series XXII renaissance”
Load more

Recommended publications
  • American Jewish Yearbook
    JEWISH STATISTICS 277 JEWISH STATISTICS The statistics of Jews in the world rest largely upon estimates. In Russia, Austria-Hungary, Germany, and a few other countries, official figures are obtainable. In the main, however, the num- bers given are based upon estimates repeated and added to by one statistical authority after another. For the statistics given below various authorities have been consulted, among them the " Statesman's Year Book" for 1910, the English " Jewish Year Book " for 5670-71, " The Jewish Ency- clopedia," Jildische Statistik, and the Alliance Israelite Uni- verselle reports. THE UNITED STATES ESTIMATES As the census of the United States has, in accordance with the spirit of American institutions, taken no heed of the religious convictions of American citizens, whether native-born or natural- ized, all statements concerning the number of Jews living in this country are based upon estimates. The Jewish population was estimated— In 1818 by Mordecai M. Noah at 3,000 In 1824 by Solomon Etting at 6,000 In 1826 by Isaac C. Harby at 6,000 In 1840 by the American Almanac at 15,000 In 1848 by M. A. Berk at 50,000 In 1880 by Wm. B. Hackenburg at 230,257 In 1888 by Isaac Markens at 400,000 In 1897 by David Sulzberger at 937,800 In 1905 by "The Jewish Encyclopedia" at 1,508,435 In 1907 by " The American Jewish Year Book " at 1,777,185 In 1910 by " The American Je\rish Year Book" at 2,044,762 DISTRIBUTION The following table by States presents two sets of estimates.
    [Show full text]
  • Orthodoxy in American Jewish Life1
    ORTHODOXY IN AMERICAN JEWISH LIFE1 by CHARLES S. LIEBMAN INTRODUCTION • DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS OF ORTHODOXY • EARLY ORTHODOX COMMUNITY • UNCOMMITTED ORTHODOX • COM- MITTED ORTHODOX • MODERN ORTHODOX • SECTARIANS • LEAD- ERSHIP • DIRECTIONS AND TENDENCIES • APPENDLX: YESHIVOT PROVIDING INTENSIVE TALMUDIC STUDY A HIS ESSAY is an effort to describe the communal aspects and institutional forms of Orthodox Judaism in the United States. For the most part, it ignores the doctrines, faith, and practices of Orthodox Jews, and barely touches upon synagogue hie, which is the most meaningful expression of American Orthodoxy. It is hoped that the reader will find here some appreciation of the vitality of American Orthodoxy. Earlier predictions of the demise of 11 am indebted to many people who assisted me in making this essay possible. More than 40, active in a variety of Orthodox organizations, gave freely of their time for extended discussions and interviews and many lay leaders and rabbis throughout the United States responded to a mail questionnaire. A number of people read a draft of this paper. I would be remiss if I did not mention a few by name, at the same time exonerating them of any responsibility for errors of fact or for my own judgments and interpretations. The section on modern Orthodoxy was read by Rabbi Emanuel Rackman. The sections beginning with the sectarian Orthodox to the conclusion of the paper were read by Rabbi Nathan Bulman. Criticism and comments on the entire paper were forthcoming from Rabbi Aaron Lichtenstein, Dr. Marshall Ski are, and Victor Geller, without whose assistance the section on the number of Orthodox Jews could not have been written.
    [Show full text]
  • Liberty, Restriction, and the Remaking of Italians and Eastern European Jews
    "Liberty, Restriction, and the Remaking of Italians and Eastern European Jews, (1882-1965)" By Maddalena Marinari University of Kansas, 2009 B.A. Istituto Universitario Orientale Submitted to the Department of History and the Faculty of The Graduate School of the University Of Kansas in partial fulfillment of The requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy __________________________________________ Dr. Jeffrey Moran, Chair __________________________________________ Dr. Donna Gabaccia __________________________________________ Dr. Sheyda Jahanbani __________________________________________ Dr. Roberta Pergher __________________________________________ Dr. Ruben Flores Date Defended: 14 December 2009 The Dissertation Committee for Maddalena Marinari certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: "Liberty, Restriction, and the Remaking of Italians and Eastern European Jews, (1882-1965)" Committee: __________________________________________ Dr. Jeffrey Moran, Chair __________________________________________ Dr. Donna Gabaccia __________________________________________ Dr. Sheyda Jahanbani __________________________________________ Dr. Roberta Pergher __________________________________________ Dr. Ruben Flores Date Approved: 14 December 2009 2 Table of Contents Introduction ……………………………………………………………………………………….3 Chapter 1: From Unwanted to Restricted (1890-1921) ………………………………………...17 Chapter 2: "The doors of America are worse than shut when they are half-way open:" The Fight against the Johnson-Reed Immigration
    [Show full text]
  • Refugees and Relief: the American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee and European Jews in Cuba and Shanghai 1938-1943
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works All Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects 2-2015 Refugees And Relief: The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee And European Jews In Cuba And Shanghai 1938-1943 Zhava Litvac Glaser Graduate Center, City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/561 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] REFUGEES AND RELIEF: THE AMERICAN JEWISH JOINT DISTRIBUTION COMMITTEE AND EUROPEAN JEWS IN CUBA AND SHANGHAI 1938-1943 by ZHAVA LITVAC GLASER A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty in History in partial fulfillment of the reQuirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, The City University of New York 2015 ii © 2015 ZHAVA LITVAC GLASER All Rights Reserved iii This manuscript has been read and accepted for the Graduate Faculty in History in satisfaction of the dissertation reQuirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Prof. Dagmar Herzog ________________________ _________________________________________ Date Chair of Examining Committee Prof. Helena Rosenblatt ________________________ _________________________________________ Date Executive Officer Prof. Jane S. Gerber Prof. Atina Grossmann Prof. Benjamin C. Hett Prof. Robert M. Seltzer Supervisory Committee The City University of
    [Show full text]
  • Assimilation, Pluralism and Multiculturalism: the Policy of Racial/ Ethnic Identity in America
    Buffalo Human Rights Law Review Volume 7 Article 1 9-1-2001 Assimilation, Pluralism and Multiculturalism: The Policy of Racial/ Ethnic Identity in America Anita Christina Butera Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.buffalo.edu/bhrlr Part of the Immigration Law Commons, and the Law and Race Commons Recommended Citation Anita C. Butera, Assimilation, Pluralism and Multiculturalism: The Policy of Racial/Ethnic Identity in America, 7 Buff. Hum. Rts. L. Rev. 1 (2001). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.buffalo.edu/bhrlr/vol7/iss1/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at Digital Commons @ University at Buffalo School of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Buffalo Human Rights Law Review by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ University at Buffalo School of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ASSIMILATION, PLURALISM AND MULTICULTURALISM: THE POLICY OF RACIAL/ETHNIC IDENTITY IN AMERICA Anita Christina Butera* In the spring of 1921, 19 year old Annamaria and her 16 year old brother, Giuseppe, had finally completed their voyage to the United States from the Italian town of Palermo. After disembarking from the cramped and unsanitary quarters of the steamship, they wearily endured the endless lines and official inspections of the Ellis Island immigrant processing sta- tions. With the successful end of the first phase of their "journey of tears," they began the next phase of social and cultural adaptation within the more comfortable boundaries of Little Italy. New national and social class identi- ties overlapped with familiar identities of region, village, and kin.
    [Show full text]
  • In Parkchester: a New Era in Jewish–Irish Relations in New York City 1940–1970
    religions Article “Getting Along” in Parkchester: A New Era in Jewish–Irish Relations in New York City 1940–1970 Jeffrey S. Gurock Department of Jewish History, Yeshiva University, New York 10033, USA; [email protected] Received: 10 May 2018; Accepted: 22 May 2018; Published: 3 June 2018 Abstract: The history of conflict between New York City’s Irish Americans and east European Jews dates back to the close of the 19th century. They disputed over jobs, union memberships, housing, and frequently over politics. These conflicts crescendoed exponentially in the decade or more of the Great Depression in Gaelic neighborhoods, now more than ever, the word on the street was that the Jews were taking over. The rhetoric and organizations of Michigan-based radio preacher Father Charles Coughlin gave voice and activism to local frustrations. However, in 1940, within a new neighborhood built in the Bronx that attracted a majority of Irish and a large proportion of Jews, there was no organized anti-Semitism, no outbursts of violence, or even significant complaints that more callow Jews were being roughed up in the streets or play areas. If animosities existed, negative feelings were kept within families and were not expressed in daily youthful encounters. Why life in Parkchester was so different is the conceit of this study. Its community history from 1940–1970s constituted a turning point in their previously-contested ethnic group relationship while what went on as Jews and the Irish ‘got along’ marks off the limits of conviviality of that time. Keywords: Jews; Irish-Americans; African Americans; The Bronx; New York City; neighborhood; ethnic-conflict The history of conflict between New York City’s Irish Americans and east European Jews dates back to the close of the 19th century.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Pluralism in Russian Press: Challenges and Prospects of Development
    CULTURAL PLURALISM IN RUSSIAN PRESS: CHALLENGES AND PROSPECTS OF DEVELOPMENT КУЛЬТУРНЫЙ ПЛЮРАЛИЗМ В РОССИЙСКИХ ПЕЧАТНЫХ СМИ: ПРОБЛЕМЫ И ПЕРСПЕКТИВЫ РАЗВИТИЯ Anna A. Gladkova, PhD, Researcher, Chair of Media Theory and Economics, Faculty of Journalism, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia [email protected] Анна Александровна Гладкова, кандидат филологических наук, научный сотрудник, кафедра теории и экономики СМИ, факультет журналистики МГУ имени М. В. Ломоносова, Москва, Россия [email protected] The article considers the role of cultural pluralism in the Russian society today, and dwells on a set of challenges and prospects it is fac- ing in multiethnic, culturally and linguistically diverse country. Special attention has been given to exploring phenomenon of cultural pluralism in the media, in particular print media, and highlighting governmental initiatives aimed at developing pluralistic media landscape in Russia. Key words: cultural pluralism; minorities; inter-ethnic relations; multiculturalism. В статье рассматривается роль культурного плюрализма в современном российском обществе, освещаются основные труд- ности, с которыми сталкивается общество при попытке реа- лизовать идею плюралистического медиаландшафта в условиях мультиэтнической и мультикультурной реальности, а также определяются перспективы развития культурного плюрализма в современной России. Особенное внимание в статье уделяется 325 изучению особенностей культурного плюрализма в российских медиа, в частности в печатных СМИ. Рассматриваются за- конопроекты и государственные инициативы, направленные на обеспечение культурного многообразия в сфере массовой инфор- мации. Ключевые слова: культурный плюрализм; меньшинства; межэтнические отношения; мультикультурализм. Cultural pluralism in the media is defined as a concept referring to a fair and diverse representation of various cultural, ethnic, linguistic, religious, gender groups, and expression of their values, standpoints and opinions through the media (Valcke, Picard, et al, 2010).
    [Show full text]
  • Islam's Response to the Challenges of Religious Pluralism
    ISLAM'S RESPONSE TO THE CHALLENGES OF RELIGIOUS PLURALISM ABSTRACT THESIS SUB^H]TED ROH JjMkAWAB^XjP THE DEGREE OF Bottor of $t)tlos;opt)p IN ^ <^- ISLAMIC STUDIES \^<- BY ARSHAa AHMAD SALROO Under the Supervision of DR. ABDUL MAJID KHAN DEPARTMENT OF ISLAMIC STUDIES AUGARH MUSLIM UNIVERSITY ALfGARH (INDIA) 2006 Abstract Abstract The Islamic response to the challenge of Religious Pluralism can be properly understood with reference to its general perspective on human society, and the mutual respect and regard for differences of views. It recognizes and respects the sanctity of freedom of thought and action. The pluralism is a concept that was initially coined by English Philosophers, like Christian Woljf (1679-1754) and Immanuel Kant They projected it as a doctrine about the plentitude of possible world-views combined with the invitation to adopt llic iiiii\crsal view-point of a world citizen. In the present day philosophy, it refers to a standpoint that the world may be interpreted in several ways. It is purported to be a science that involves evaluation, which is enhanced by competitions between several interpretations. In ethics and in normative sociology, it refers to the problem that modern society is no longer based on an authoritative set of norms, leaving all ethical questions in the terminology of Jurgen Habermas, subject to open-ended and rational discourse. Pluralism is thought not to mean only the physical proximity of the people of diverse creeds and ethnic origin. It implies interaction on both the individual and collective planes. At the individual level friction is not necessarily eliminated.
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond the Rhetoric of Assimilation and Cultural Pluralism: Addressing the Tension of Separatism and Conflict in an Immigration- Driven Multiracial Society
    Beyond the Rhetoric of Assimilation and Cultural Pluralism: Addressing the Tension of Separatism and Conflict in an Immigration- Driven Multiracial Society Bill Ong Hingt Immigration is quickly changing the racial demographics of the United States. In so doing, it is creating both tensions and opportunities. The author responds to those who advocate restricted immigration as the solution to racialproblems. He refutes the underlying assumptions of such Euro-immigrationists: that the United States has a solely white, Christian, and European heritage, and that other immigrantshave failed to accultur- ate. Furthermore, culturalpluralism in a multiracialsociety has several benefits, including its connection to constitutionalprinciples and its advan- tages in both the global and the increasinglydiverse domestic economy. In turn, the author takes cultural pluralists to task for not grappling suffi- ciently with interethnic conflict and separatism. While interethnicconflict and separatistsentiment are exacerbated by society's exclusion ofpeople of color, they are problems that cannot be ignored. The author articulatesa new approach to cultural pluralism in a broader definition of America. This new approach would respect diverse views and cultures, including the right of separatists within communities of color. It would also require adherence to a common core of values, including respect for the laws, for the democraticpolitical and economic system, and for equal opportunity. INTRODUCTION I think God made all people good, but if we had to take a million immigrants in, say, Zulus, next year or Englishmen and t Associate Professor of Law, Stanford Law School. I have many people to thank for this article. Many friends provided helpful comments on earlier drafts: Paul Brest, Lawrence Friedman, Gerry Gunther, Mark Kelman, Bill McGowan, Joyce Hing McGowan, Mark Silverman, Bill Simon, Michael Wald, and especially Tom Grey.
    [Show full text]
  • Addressing Cultural, Ethnic & Religious Diversity Challenges In
    Addressing Cultural, Ethnic & Religious Diversity Challenges in Europe A Comparative Overview of 15 European Countries Anna Triandafyllidou European University Institute 2011/02 1. Overview National Discourses Comparative Country Report Cultural Diversity in Europe: A Comparative Analysis 2 Anna Triandafyllidou EUROPEAN UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE, FLORENCE ROBERT SCHUMAN CENTRE FOR ADVANCED STUDIES Addressing Cultural, Ethnic and Religious Diversity Challenges in Europe A Comparative Overview of 15 European Countries ANNA TRIANDAFYLLIDOU 3 Cultural Diversity in Europe: A Comparative Analysis © 2012 ACCEPT Pluralism This report was first published in November 2011. This is a revised version, prepared in February 2012. This text may be downloaded only for personal research purposes. Additional reproduction for other purposes, whether in hard copies or electronically, requires the consent of the author(s), editor(s). If cited or quoted, reference should be made to the full name of the author(s), editor(s), the title, the research project, the year and the publisher. Published by the European University Institute Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies Via dei Roccettini 9 50014 San Domenico di Fiesole - Italy ACCEPT PLURALISM Research Project, Tolerance, Pluralism and Social Cohesion: Responding to the Challenges of the 21st Century in Europe European Commission, DG Research Seventh Framework Programme Social Sciences and Humanities grant agreement no. 243837 www.accept-pluralism.eu www.eui.eu/RSCAS/ Available from the EUI institutional repository CADMUS cadmus.eui.eu P1 Overview of National Discourses on Tolerance and Cultural Diversity (Literature and Realities) D 1.2 Synthesis and Comparative Overview of the Country Reports The layout of this report has been prepared by Ms Nina Papaioannou 4 Anna Triandafyllidou The ACCEPT PLURALISM Research Project Tolerance, Pluralism and Social Cohesion: Responding to the Challenges of the 21st Century in Europe In 2001, violent conflicts between native British and Asian Muslim youth took place in northern England.
    [Show full text]
  • American Jewish History and Culture
    Fall 2017 American Jewish History Exile or Promised Land? Difference or Synthesis? (DRAFT, subject to change) History 512:231:01/Jewish Studies 563:231:01 Professor Nancy Sinkoff Miller Hall, Room 115 Office Hours, Tuesdays, 4:30-5:30 T/TR, 5th period (2:50-4:10 p.m.) 14 College Avenue, room 103 [email protected] This course will examine the history of American Jews through the lenses of the questions: is America the land of exile or the land of promise? How have American Jews synthesized their Jewishness (inclusive of religion) with American values and how have they distinguished their Jewishness from American values? Where have the points of conflict between these two sets of values resided? How have American Jews created Jewish communal forms in the United States and how has American individualism militated against those forms’ cohesion and longevity? What American Jewish thinkers have addressed these issues? How have Jews interpreted their Jewish and American identities culturally? Topics to be covered include: migration, communal and religious innovation, acculturation, ethnicity, and politics. The course will also explore the ways in which Jews have been represented by popular American cultural forms, including fiction and films. Students are required to read the materials in advance of our sessions. We will pay careful attention to the primary sources—all of which are available on Sakai—in class. Hasia Diner, The History of the Jews in the United States, 1954-2004, is the “textbook” for the course. Additional readings, in the form of articles and book chapters, have been uploaded on Sakai.
    [Show full text]
  • Philosophy of Contemporary Polycultural Education
    I NTERNATIONAL JOURNAL Of ACADEMIC RESEARCH Vol. 3. No. 1. January, 2011, Part I PHILOSOPHY OF CONTEMPORARY POLYCULTURAL EDUCATION Prof. Dr. Nadejda Bulankina1,2, Sophia Polyankina2 1Moscow Pedagogical State University 2Novosibirsk Тeachers’ Retraining Institute (RUSSIA) ABSTRACT The goal of the article is to consider one of the urgent issues of modern school, i. e. education in the context of multiculturalism. In the article there are compared the concepts of “multicultural education” in the USA and “polycultural education” in Russian Federation. Meanwhile it is noted that conceptual structure of modern polycultural education is going through a syncretic phase, which means that inventory and concretization of concepts appearing in the papers on this topic are indispensable. Key words: multicultural education, polycultural education, multiculturalism, personal self-determination in culture. Global integration has become one of the main reasons for being aware of multiculturalism as the significant feature of contemporary social reality. The processes of globalization lead to renewal and revival of different cultures and languages of culture by multiplying the number of integral connections favoring mutual understanding between the members of the cultural dialogue. Education becomes one of the major integrating factors and conditions for the personal development, while integration processes in education systems act as the means to master the world culture, to transmit social and individual experience, to provide for designing common world-view
    [Show full text]