arXiv:1810.12267v1 [astro-ph.SR] 29 Oct 2018 [email protected] orsodn uhr n ai Cody Marie Ann author: Corresponding icmtla aeil(oy&Hlebad21 n eeecsthe references se and pre-main 2018 t of Hillenbrand In & analyses (Cody therein). detailed material references enabled circumstellar and also 2018 has al. photometry et series Vanderburg 2018, al. et icvr fpaesi noe lse Mio ta.21) edn t leading 2013), al. et (Meibom cluster open an in planets of discovery odce nM7(tloe l 06 n 4 n ftegoua clust globular the of one M4, and 2016) al. et (Stello M67 in conducted rm iso Hke ta.21,Craoe l 02 n referen and 2012, al. a et in Corsaro detected been 2011, have ou al. oscillations carried et type been (Hekker has giants, mission red prime on focusing particularly seismology, safnto fae(.. ilne l 07adrfrne therein). references and 2017 al. et Gillen (e.g., age of function a an with angu as attention, Stellar et received 2015). (Barnes also has M67 al. ages of et intermediate stars (Meibom to sequence 6819 sequence main NGC cluster the billion-year-old in 2.5 probed been has down n nassmn ftedge fatninrcie yec clu each by received attention of degree the of assessment an and nTF,bthv eti pt h omnt oetatte rmsu from them extract to met community analysis photometric the of to tuning ha up some careful missions it more The co left require have regions ronments 2018). but larger al. forma TPFs, et “superstamps”– two in Cody of 2.) (see one or stars in targets, ground/background collected single are isolated observations on Cluster an coeval, targets. of be to considered age. versus are occurrence stars planet of and groups astrophysics These list. of target highlight A plane. ecliptic lblrcutr ( clusters globular hl the while oeta vne o uueresearch. future by for observed avenues associations potential and clusters all of yee sn L using 2018 Typeset 30, October version Draft tr opiigalrerneo gs t -er“rm”msino mission “prime” 4-year Its ages. of range large a comprising stars n ai Cody, Marie Ann mn h lses ueoselpigbnr ytm aebe u been have systems binary eclipsing numerous clusters, the Among an gyrochronology making starspots, have members cluster Many netgtosinto Investigations The nall, In ic t anhi 09 the 2009, in launch its Since aao f2 pncutr n soitososre yth by observed associations and clusters open 29 of catalog A Kepler/K2 Kepler Kepler K2 A iso iiitdi 04 oele l 04 a oue o 08 d 70–80 for focused has 2014) al. et Howell 2014; in (initiated Mission T and E a bevdtosa omn soitos(age associations forming star two observed has X ,2 1, lseshv eevdmr teto hnohr odt.I th In date. to others than attention more received have clusters & RNAAS K2 er Barentsen, Geert 1Gr.Tecmiaino lsesi rvddi al ,aogwt th with along 1, Table in provided is clusters of compilation The Gyr). 11 2 Kepler/K2 3 a raEvrnetlRsac nttt,652dS t.2 Ste. St 2nd 625 Institute, Research Environmental Area Bay AAGdadSaeFih etr 80GenetR. Green Rd., Greenbelt 8800 Center, Flight Space Goddard NASA isospbil ees l olce mgn aa swl slgtcurve light as well as data, imaging collected all release publicly Missions 1 AAAe eerhCne,Mfft ld onanVe,C 94 CA View, Mountain Blvd, Moffett Center, Research Ames NASA tl nAASTeX62 in style Kepler’s elrSaeTelescope Space Kepler LSE CEC N UUEPOTENTIAL FUTURE AND SCIENCE CLUSTER lseshv opie ubro ra,fo tla oplaneta to stellar from areas, of number a comprised have clusters ,2 1, ELRSCUTROBSERVATIONS CLUSTER KEPLER’S bevtoshsbe h nlso fglci pnadgoua clus globular and open galactic of inclusion the been has observations hitn Hedges, Christina tv Bryson, Steve K2 Kepler lse teHae;Ln ta.21) seoesooyhsalso has Asteroseismology 2016). al. et Lund Hyades; (the cluster rm20–08 n ihih e lse cec eut swl as well as results science cluster key highlight and 2009–2018, from 1 Missions n ihlsSaunders Nicholas and Brcie l 00 a htmtial monitored photometrically has 2010) al. et (Borucki ,2 1, ihe Gully-Santiago, Michael < eyugs lsesadascain,peiintime precision associations, and clusters youngest he 0Mr,1 pncutr 1Mrt y) n nine and Gyr), 8 to Myr (1 clusters open 18 Myr), 10 ster’s lssb eule l 21,21)aogothers. among 2018) (2016, al. et Rebull by alyses hspoieiellbrtre o etn stellar testing for laboratories ideal provide thus d ost rdc rcso iesre.A result, a As series. time precision produce to hods s . ml tre ie ls TF)centered (TPFs) files” pixel “target small 1.) ts: oainsuispplredaos tla spin- Stellar endeavors. popular studies rotation d epoue n eesdlgtcre o targets for curves light released and produced ve nteoe lsesosre uigthe during observed clusters open the in t rein). ssigo ohtecutro neetadfore- and interest of cluster the both of nsisting uneaceinpeoeaadosuainby obscuration and phenomena accretion quence e hri) n oercnl,tefis solar first the recently, more and therein), ces sre single a bserved adu fohrfid from finds other of handful a o l 06adrfrne hri)a ela the as well as therein) references and 2016 al. Kepler/K2 r agtdby targeted ers cvrdadue opoeselrstructure stellar probe to used and ncovered a oetmeouinfo h pre-main the from evolution momentum lar The esap.Sasi rwe lse envi- cluster crowded in Stars perstamps. ,2 1, 9 eaua A94952 CA Petaluma, 09, et D271 USA 20771, MD belt, Kepler ,2 1, snt,w rsn h compilation the present we note, is aai h literature. the in data eseDotson, Jessie 3,USA 035, y tatm nojcsi the in objects on time a at ays iso loealdtefirst the enabled also mission K2 ∼ 10 Mgi ta.2016). al. et (Miglio ◦ e × bevn campaign observing e Kepler 10 ,2 1, ysine Astero- science. ry o h majority the for s ◦ hmsBarclay, Thomas edi Cygnus, in field K2 and (Livingston esi its in ters ∼ 500,000 K2 Kepler been 3 2

Table 1. Clusters and associations observed during the Kepler and K2 Missions

Region Campaign Super- Region Age Range Extensively

stamp? Type [Gyr] studied?

NGC 6819 Kepler prime Y open cluster 1–2 Y NGC 6791 Kepler prime Y open cluster ∼8 Y NGC 6811 Kepler prime N open cluster 1–2 N NGC 6866 Kepler prime N open cluster 0.4–0.8 N M35 K2 C0 Y open cluster 0.1–0.2 N NGC 2158 K2 C0 Y open cluster 1–2 N M4 K2 C2 Y globular cluster &11 N M80 K2 C2 Y globular cluster &11 N Upper Scorpius K2 C2, C15 N association .0.01 Y ρ Ophiuchus K2 C2 N open cluster <0.01 N Pleiades K2 C4 N open cluster 0.1–0.2 Y Hyades K2 C4, C13 N open cluster 0.4–0.8 Y M67 K2 C5, C16, C18 Y open cluster 3–4 Y Praesepe K2 C5, C16, C18 N open cluster 0.4–0.8 Y Ruprecht 147 K2 C7 Y open cluster 3–4 N NGC 6717 K2 C7 N globular cluster &11 N NGC 6530 K2 C9 Y open cluster <0.01 N M9 K2 C11 Y globular cluster &11 N M19 K2 C11 Y globular cluster &11 N NGC 6293 K2 C11 Y globular cluster &11 N NGC 6355 K2 C11 Y globular cluster &11 N Terzan 5 K2 C11 Y globular cluster &11 N NGC 1647 K2 C13 N open cluster 0.1–0.2 N NGC 1746 K2 C13 N open cluster* - N NGC 1817 K2 C13 N open cluster 1–2 N Taurus K2 C13 N association <0.01 N NGC 1750 K2 C13 N open cluster 0.1–0.2 N NGC 1758 K2 C13 N open cluster 0.4–0.8 N NGC 5897 K2 C15 Y globular cluster &11 N Note—Basic data on the clusters and associations photometrically monitored as part of the Kepler and K2 missions. Column six provides a measure of how well studied the cluster is by noting whether there are more than five papers analyzing its Kepler or K2 data. We note that the cluster status of NGC 1746 is debated; it may be an asterism of unrelated stars.

While the science return thus far from the clusters of Kepler and K2 has been excellent, only a fraction of its potential has been mined. According to our criteria of assessment (>5 refereed papers), only a third of observed clusters have been extensively studied thus far. We hope that by providing the complete list observed by Kepler, the astronomical community will be motivated to further probe the astrophysics of member stars and their companions. The more crowded regions will benefit from new photometry techniques under development, such as psf modeling and fitting. This is especially the case for the globular clusters, which provide an opportunity to study some of the oldest stars in the universe. 3

REFERENCES

Barnes S. et al. 2016 ApJ, 823, 16 Lund, M. N., Basu, S., Silva Aguirre, V., et al. 2016, Borucki, W. J., Koch, D., Basri, G., et al. 2010 Science, MNRAS 463, 2600 Meibom, S., Torres, G., Fressin, F., et al. 2013, Nature, 327, 977 499, 55 Cody, A. M. & Hillenbrand, L. A. 2018 AJ, 156, 71 Meibom, S., Barnes, S. A., Platais, I., et al. 2015, Nature, Cody, A. M., Barentsen, G, Hedges, C. L., Gully-Santiago, 517, 589 M., Vin´ıcius de Miranda Cardoso, J. 2018 RNAAS, 2, 25 Miglio. A., Chaplin, W. J., Brogaard, K., et al. 2016 Corsaro, E., Stello, D., Huber, D. et al. 2012 ApJ, 757, 190 MNRAS, 461, 760 Rebull, L. M., Stauffer, J. R., Bouvier, J., et al. 2016, AJ, Gillen, E., Hillenbrand, L. A., David, T. J, et al. 2017 ApJ, 152, 113 849, 11 Rebull, L. M., Stauffer, J. R., Cody, A. M., et al. 2018, AJ, Hekker, S., Basu, S., Stello, D., et al. 2011 A&A, 530, 100 155, 196 Howell, S. B., Sobeck, C., Haas, M., et al. 2014, PASP, 126, Stello, D., Vanderburg, A., Casagrande, L., et al. 2016, 832, 398 133 Vanderburg, A., Mann, A. W., Rizzutto, A., et al. 2018, Livingston, J. H., Dai, F., Hirano, T., et al. 2018 AJ, 155, AJ, 156, 46 115