AL Urban Observing Program
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Rosette Nebula and Monoceros Loop
Oshkosh Scholar Page 43 Studying Complex Star-Forming Fields: Rosette Nebula and Monoceros Loop Chris Hathaway and Anthony Kuchera, co-authors Dr. Nadia Kaltcheva, Physics and Astronomy, faculty adviser Christopher Hathaway obtained a B.S. in physics in 2007 and is currently pursuing his masters in physics education at UW Oshkosh. He collaborated with Dr. Nadia Kaltcheva on his senior research project and presented their findings at theAmerican Astronomical Society meeting (2008), the Celebration of Scholarship at UW Oshkosh (2009), and the National Conference on Undergraduate Research in La Crosse, Wisconsin (2009). Anthony Kuchera graduated from UW Oshkosh in May 2008 with a B.S. in physics. He collaborated with Dr. Kaltcheva from fall 2006 through graduation. He presented his astronomy-related research at Posters in the Rotunda (2007 and 2008), the Wisconsin Space Conference (2007), the UW System Symposium for Undergraduate Research and Creative Activity (2007 and 2008), and the American Astronomical Society’s 211th meeting (2008). In December 2009 he earned an M.S. in physics from Florida State University where he is currently working toward a Ph.D. in experimental nuclear physics. Dr. Nadia Kaltcheva is a professor of physics and astronomy. She received her Ph.D. from the University of Sofia in Bulgaria. She joined the UW Oshkosh Physics and Astronomy Department in 2001. Her research interests are in the field of stellar photometry and its application to the study of Galactic star-forming fields and the spiral structure of the Milky Way. Abstract An investigation that presents a new analysis of the structure of the Northern Monoceros field was recently completed at the Department of Physics andAstronomy at UW Oshkosh. -
Spatial and Kinematic Structure of Monoceros Star-Forming Region
MNRAS 476, 3160–3168 (2018) doi:10.1093/mnras/sty447 Advance Access publication 2018 February 22 Spatial and kinematic structure of Monoceros star-forming region M. T. Costado1‹ and E. J. Alfaro2 1Departamento de Didactica,´ Universidad de Cadiz,´ E-11519 Puerto Real, Cadiz,´ Spain. Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article-abstract/476/3/3160/4898067 by Universidad de Granada - Biblioteca user on 13 April 2020 2Instituto de Astrof´ısica de Andaluc´ıa, CSIC, Apdo 3004, E-18080 Granada, Spain Accepted 2018 February 9. Received 2018 February 8; in original form 2017 December 14 ABSTRACT The principal aim of this work is to study the velocity field in the Monoceros star-forming region using the radial velocity data available in the literature, as well as astrometric data from the Gaia first release. This region is a large star-forming complex formed by two associations named Monoceros OB1 and OB2. We have collected radial velocity data for more than 400 stars in the area of 8 × 12 deg2 and distance for more than 200 objects. We apply a clustering analysis in the subspace of the phase space formed by angular coordinates and radial velocity or distance data using the Spectrum of Kinematic Grouping methodology. We found four and three spatial groupings in radial velocity and distance variables, respectively, corresponding to the Local arm, the central clusters forming the associations and the Perseus arm, respectively. Key words: techniques: radial velocities – astronomical data bases: miscellaneous – parallaxes – stars: formation – stars: kinematics and dynamics – open clusters and associations: general. Hoogerwerf & De Bruijne 1999;Lee&Chen2005; Lombardi, 1 INTRODUCTION Alves & Lada 2011). -
Winter Constellations
Winter Constellations *Orion *Canis Major *Monoceros *Canis Minor *Gemini *Auriga *Taurus *Eradinus *Lepus *Monoceros *Cancer *Lynx *Ursa Major *Ursa Minor *Draco *Camelopardalis *Cassiopeia *Cepheus *Andromeda *Perseus *Lacerta *Pegasus *Triangulum *Aries *Pisces *Cetus *Leo (rising) *Hydra (rising) *Canes Venatici (rising) Orion--Myth: Orion, the great hunter. In one myth, Orion boasted he would kill all the wild animals on the earth. But, the earth goddess Gaia, who was the protector of all animals, produced a gigantic scorpion, whose body was so heavily encased that Orion was unable to pierce through the armour, and was himself stung to death. His companion Artemis was greatly saddened and arranged for Orion to be immortalised among the stars. Scorpius, the scorpion, was placed on the opposite side of the sky so that Orion would never be hurt by it again. To this day, Orion is never seen in the sky at the same time as Scorpius. DSO’s ● ***M42 “Orion Nebula” (Neb) with Trapezium A stellar nursery where new stars are being born, perhaps a thousand stars. These are immense clouds of interstellar gas and dust collapse inward to form stars, mainly of ionized hydrogen which gives off the red glow so dominant, and also ionized greenish oxygen gas. The youngest stars may be less than 300,000 years old, even as young as 10,000 years old (compared to the Sun, 4.6 billion years old). 1300 ly. 1 ● *M43--(Neb) “De Marin’s Nebula” The star-forming “comma-shaped” region connected to the Orion Nebula. ● *M78--(Neb) Hard to see. A star-forming region connected to the Orion Nebula. -
How to Make $1000 with Your Telescope! – 4 Stargazers' Diary
Fort Worth Astronomical Society (Est. 1949) February 2010 : Astronomical League Member Club Calendar – 2 Opportunities & The Sky this Month – 3 How to Make $1000 with your Telescope! – 4 Astronaut Sally Ride to speak at UTA – 4 Aurgia the Charioteer – 5 Stargazers’ Diary – 6 Bode’s Galaxy by Steve Tuttle 1 February 2010 Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday 1 2 3 4 5 6 Algol at Minima Last Qtr Moon Æ 5:48 am 11:07 pm Top ten binocular deep-sky objects for February: M35, M41, M46, M47, M50, M93, NGC 2244, NGC 2264, NGC 2301, NGC 2360 Top ten deep-sky objects for February: M35, M41, M46, M47, M50, M93, NGC 2261, NGC 2362, NGC 2392, NGC 2403 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Algol at Minima Morning sports a Moon at Apogee New Moon Æ super thin crescent (252,612 miles) 8:51 am 7:56 pm Moon 8:00 pm 3RF Star Party Make use of the New Moon Weekend for . better viewing at the Dark Sky Site See Notes Below New Moon New Moon Weekend Weekend 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Presidents Day 3RF Star Party Valentine’s Day FWAS Traveler’s Guide Meeting to the Planets UTA’s Maverick Clyde Tombaugh Ranger 8 returns Normal Room premiers on Speakers Series discovered Pluto photographs and NatGeo 7pm Sally Ride “Fat Tuesday” Ash Wednesday 80 years ago. impacts Moon. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Algol at Minima First Qtr Moon Moon at Perigee Å (222,345 miles) 6:42 pm 12:52 am 4 pm {Low in the NW) Algol at Minima Æ 9:43 pm Challenge binary star for month: 15 Lyncis (Lynx) Challenge deep-sky object for month: IC 443 (Gemini) Notable carbon star for month: BL Orionis (Orion) 28 Notes: Full Moon Look for a very thin waning crescent moon perched just above and slightly right of tiny Mercury on the morning of 10:38 pm Feb. -
Download This Article in PDF Format
A&A 496, 153–176 (2009) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:200811096 & c ESO 2009 Astrophysics A census of molecular hydrogen outflows and their sources along the Orion A molecular ridge Characteristics and overall distribution C. J. Davis1, D. Froebrich2,T.Stanke3,S.T.Megeath4,M.S.N.Kumar5,A.Adamson1,J.Eislöffel6,R.Gredel7, T. Khanzadyan8,P.Lucas9,M.D.Smith2, and W. P. Varricatt1 1 Joint Astronomy Centre, 660 North A’ohok¯ u¯ Place, University Park, Hilo, Hawaii 96720, USA e-mail: [email protected] 2 Centre for Astrophysics & Planetary Science, School of Physical Sciences, University of Kent, Canterbury CT2 7NR, UK 3 European Southern Observatory, Garching, Germany 4 Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH 43606-3390, USA 5 Centro de Astrofisica da Universidade do Porto, Rua das Estrelas s/n 4150-762 Porto, Portugal 6 Thüringer Landessternwarte Tautenburg, Sternwarte 5, 07778 Tautenburg, Germany 7 Max Plank Institute für Astronomie, Königstuhl 17, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany 8 Centre for Astronomy, Department of Experimental Physics, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland 9 Centre for Astrophysics Research, Science & Technology Research Institute, University of Hertfordshire, College Lane, Hatfield AL10 9AB, UK Received 6 October 2008 / Accepted 16 December 2008 ABSTRACT Aims. A census of molecular hydrogen flows across the entire Orion A giant molecular cloud is sought. With this paper we aim to associate each flow with its progenitor and associated molecular core, so that the characteristics of the outflows and outflow sources can be established. Methods. We present wide-field near-infrared images of Orion A, obtained with the Wide Field Camera, WFCAM, on the United Kingdom Infrared Telescope. -
A Spitzer Study of Debris Disks in the Young Nearby Cluster NGC 2232
A Spitzer Study of Debris Disks In The Young Nearby Cluster NGC 2232: Icy Planets Are Common Around ∼ 1.5–3 M⊙ Stars Thayne Currie1, Peter Plavchan2, and Scott J. Kenyon1 [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] ABSTRACT We describe Spitzer IRAC and MIPS observations of the nearby 25 Myr- old open cluster NGC 2232. Combining these data with ROSAT All-Sky Survey observations, proper motions, and optical photometry/spectroscopy, we construct a list of highly probable cluster members. We identify 1 A-type star, HD 45435, with definite excess emission at 4.5–24 µm indicative of debris from terrestrial planet formation. We also identify 2–4 late-type stars with possible 8 µm excesses, and 8 early-type stars with definite 24 µm excesses. Constraints on the dust luminosity and temperature suggest that the detected excesses are produced by debris disks. From our sample of B and A stars, stellar rotation appears correlated with 24 µm excess, a result expected if massive primordial disks evolve into massive debris disks. To explore the evolution of the frequency and magnitude of debris around A-type stars, we combine our results with data for other young clusters. The frequency of debris disks around A-type stars appears to increase from ∼ 25% at 5 Myr to ∼ 50–60% at 20–25 Myr. Older A-type stars have smaller debris disk frequencies: ∼ 20% at 50–100 Myr. For these ages, the typical level of debris emission rises from 5–20 Myr and then declines. Because 24 µm dust emission probes icy planet formation around A-type stars, our results suggest that the frequency of icy planet formation is ηi & 0.5–0.6. -
February 14, 2015 7:00Pm at the Herrett Center for Arts & Science Colleagues, College of Southern Idaho
Snake River Skies The Newsletter of the Magic Valley Astronomical Society www.mvastro.org Membership Meeting President’s Message Saturday, February 14, 2015 7:00pm at the Herrett Center for Arts & Science Colleagues, College of Southern Idaho. Public Star Party Follows at the It’s that time of year when obstacles appear in the sky. In particular, this year is Centennial Obs. loaded with fog. It got in the way of letting us see the dance of the Jovian moons late last month, and it’s hindered our views of other unique shows. Still, members Club Officers reported finding enough of a clear sky to let us see Comet Lovejoy, and some great photos by members are popping up on the Facebook page. Robert Mayer, President This month, however, is a great opportunity to see the benefit of something [email protected] getting in the way. Our own Chris Anderson of the Herrett Center has been using 208-312-1203 the Centennial Observatory’s scope to do work on occultation’s, particularly with asteroids. This month’s MVAS meeting on Feb. 14th will give him the stage to Terry Wofford, Vice President show us just how this all works. [email protected] The following weekend may also be the time the weather allows us to resume 208-308-1821 MVAS-only star parties. Feb. 21 is a great window for a possible star party; we’ll announce the location if the weather permits. However, if we don’t get that Gary Leavitt, Secretary window, we’ll fall back on what has become a MVAS tradition: Planetarium night [email protected] at the Herrett Center. -
TAAS Monthly Observing Challenge December 2015 Deep Sky Object
TAAS Monthly Observing Challenge December 2015 Deep Sky Object NGC 772 (GX) Aries ra: 01h 59m 20.1s dec: +19° 00’ 26” Magnitude (visual) = 10.3 Size = 7.2’ x 4.3’ Position angle = 130° Description: NGC 772 (also known as Arp 78) is an unbarred spiral galaxy approximately 130 million light-years away in the constellation Aries. Around 200,000 light years in diameter, NGC 772 is twice the size of the Milky Way Galaxy, and is surrounded by several satellite galaxies – including the dwarf elliptical, NGC 770 – whose tidal forces on the larger galaxy have likely caused the emergence of a single elongated outer spiral arm that is much more developed than the others arms. Halton Arp includes NGC 772 in his Atlas of Peculiar Galaxies as Arp 78, where it is described as a "Spiral galaxy with a small high-surface brightness companion". Two supernovae (SN 2003 hl & SN 2003 iq) have been observed in NGC 772. Source: https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/NGC_772 AL: Herschel 400 Challenge Object NGC 2371 / 2372 (PN) Gemini ra: 07h 25m 34.8s dec: +29° 29’ 22” Magnitude (visual) = 11.2 Size = 62” Description: NGC 2371-2 is a dual lobed planetary nebula located in the constellation Gemini. Visually, it appears like it could be two separate objects; therefore, two entries were given to the planetary nebula by William Herschel in the "New General Catalogue", so it may be referred to as NGC 2371, NGC 2372, or variations on this name. Source: https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/NGC_2371-2 AL: Herschel 400, Planetary Nebula Binocular Object NGC 1807 (OC) Taurus ra: 05h 10m 46.0s dec: +16° 31’ 00” Magnitude (visual) = 7.0 Size = 12’ Description: NGC 1807 is an open cluster at the border of the constellations Taurus and Orion near the open cluster NGC 1817. -
Central Coast Astronomy Virtual Star Party January 16Th 7Pm Pacific
Central Coast Astronomy Virtual Star Party January 16th 7pm Pacific Welcome to our Virtual Star Gazing session! We’ll be focusing on objects you can see with binoculars or a small telescope, so after our session, you can simply walk outside, look up, and understand what you’re looking at. CCAS President Aurora Lipper and astronomer Kent Wallace will bring you a virtual “tour of the night sky” where you can discover, learn, and ask questions as we go along! All you need is an internet connection. You can use an iPad, laptop, computer or cell phone. When 7pm on Saturday night rolls around, click the link on our website to join our class. CentralCoastAstronomy.org/stargaze Before our session starts: Step 1: Download your free map of the night sky: SkyMaps.com They have it available for Northern and Southern hemispheres. Step 2: Print out this document and use it to take notes during our time on Saturday. This document highlights the objects we will focus on in our session together. Celestial Objects: Moon: The moon is 3 days past new, which is really good for star gazing. Be sure to look at the moon tonight with your naked eyes and/or binoculars! Mercury is rising into the western sky and may be a good target near the end of the month. Mars is up high but is shrinking in size as the weeks progress. *Image credit: all astrophotography images are courtesy of NASA unless otherwise noted. All planetarium images are courtesy of Stellarium. Central Coast Astronomy CentralCoastAstronomy.org Page 1 Main Focus for the Session: 1. -
A Basic Requirement for Studying the Heavens Is Determining Where In
Abasic requirement for studying the heavens is determining where in the sky things are. To specify sky positions, astronomers have developed several coordinate systems. Each uses a coordinate grid projected on to the celestial sphere, in analogy to the geographic coordinate system used on the surface of the Earth. The coordinate systems differ only in their choice of the fundamental plane, which divides the sky into two equal hemispheres along a great circle (the fundamental plane of the geographic system is the Earth's equator) . Each coordinate system is named for its choice of fundamental plane. The equatorial coordinate system is probably the most widely used celestial coordinate system. It is also the one most closely related to the geographic coordinate system, because they use the same fun damental plane and the same poles. The projection of the Earth's equator onto the celestial sphere is called the celestial equator. Similarly, projecting the geographic poles on to the celest ial sphere defines the north and south celestial poles. However, there is an important difference between the equatorial and geographic coordinate systems: the geographic system is fixed to the Earth; it rotates as the Earth does . The equatorial system is fixed to the stars, so it appears to rotate across the sky with the stars, but of course it's really the Earth rotating under the fixed sky. The latitudinal (latitude-like) angle of the equatorial system is called declination (Dec for short) . It measures the angle of an object above or below the celestial equator. The longitud inal angle is called the right ascension (RA for short). -
Evolution of Star Clusters in Time-Variable Tidal Fields
Evolution of Star Clusters in Time-Variable Tidal Fields A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Drexel University by Ernest N. Mamikonyan in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy December 12, 2013 Contents 1 Introduction 1 1.1 TypesofStarClusters............................ 2 1.1.1 GlobularClusters .......................... 3 1.1.2 OpenClusters............................ 4 1.2 Mass Function: From Young to Globular . 5 2 Arbitrary Tidal Acceleration 8 2.1 ApproximatingTidalEffects. 9 2.1.1 Tidal Acceleration Tensor . 10 2.2 Stellar Dynamics with KIRA ........................ 11 2.2.1 CircularOrbitinPoint-MassPotential . 14 2.3 GalaxyMergerSimulations . 16 2.3.1 TidalHistories............................ 19 2.4 N-BodySimulations ............................ 24 2.4.1 N-BodyUnits ............................ 26 2.4.2 Scaling ................................ 26 3 Mass Loss Model 30 i 3.1 Accelerated Two-Body Relaxation . 30 3.2 FluctuationsintheJacobiRadius. 34 3.3 Results .................................... 36 3.4 Discussion.................................. 37 3.4.1 Limitations ............................. 40 4 Globular Cluster Mass Functions 44 4.1 MassFunctionEvolution . 47 4.2 Results .................................... 48 4.2.1 SinkParticles ............................ 48 4.2.2 DiskParticles ............................ 50 4.2.3 HaloParticles ............................ 55 5 Conclusions and Future Work 57 Appendix A Implementation of Tidal Fields in KIRA 63 Appendix B Computing Tidal Acceleration from GADGET Output 66 ii List of Figures 1.1 Infrared image of the globular cluster Omega Centauri. It is the most massive cluster in the Galaxy and thought to be a remnant of a dwarf galaxy absorbed by the Milky Way. (NASA/JPL-Caltech/ NOAO/AURA/NSF)............................. 3 1.2 The Pleiades open cluster in the infrared. It is one of the most well- known and spectacular objects in the Galaxy. -
Download This Article in PDF Format
A&A 453, 101–119 (2006) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20053894 & c ESO 2006 Astrophysics On the difference between nuclear and contraction ages, W. Lyra1,2,3,A.Moitinho4,N.S.vanderBliek1,andJ.Alves5 1 Cerro Tololo Interamerican Observatory, Casilla 603 La Serena, Chile 2 Observatório do Valongo/UFRJ, Ladeira do Pedro Antônio 43, 20080-090 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil 3 Department of Astronomy and Space Physics, Uppsala Astronomical Observatory, Box 515, 751 20 Uppsala, Sweden e-mail: [email protected] 4 Observatório Astronómico de Lisboa, Tapada da Ajuda, 1349-018 Lisbon, Portugal 5 European Southern Observatory, Karl-Schwarzschild 2, 85748 Garching, Germany Received 23 July 2005 / Accepted 20 February 2006 ABSTRACT Context. Ages derived from low mass stars still contracting onto the main sequence often differ from ages derived from the high mass ones that have already evolved away from it. Aims. We investigate the general claim of disagreement between these two independent age determinations by presenting UBVRI pho- tometry for the young galactic open clusters NGC 2232, NGC 2516, NGC 2547 and NGC 4755, spanning the age range ∼10–150 Myr Methods. We derived reddenings, distances, and nuclear ages by fitting ZAMS and isochrones to color–magnitudes and color–color di- agrams. To derive contraction ages, we used four different pre-main sequence models, with an empirically calibrated color-temperature relation to match the Pleiades cluster sequence. Results. When exclusively using the V vs. V − I color–magnitude diagram and empirically calibrated isochrones, there is consistency between nuclear and contraction ages for the studied clusters.