VOL 0014 ISSUE 0001.Pdf
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Annual List of Obligated Projects
Annual Listing of Obligated Projects Fiscal Year - 2018 6100 Southport Road Portage, IN 46368 www.nirpc.org Annual Listing of Obligated Projects – FY 2018 Introduction The Northwestern Indiana Regional Planning Commission (NIRPC) is a regional council of local governments serving the citizens of Lake, Porter, and LaPorte counties in Northwest Indiana. It is organized under the provisions of Indiana Code 36-7-7.6. NIRPC also serves as the Metropolitan Planning Organization for these three counties. The FAST Act (Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act) was signed into law by President Barack Obama in 2015. This act provides long term funding certainty for surface transportation infrastructure planning and investment. The act continues (from the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century- MAP 21) the requirement that Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPO’s) prepare an annual list of projects in which federal funds have been obligated for in the preceding year (23 U.S.C. of 49 U.S.C. Chapter 53). The Act further states that this list must be published within 90 days of the close of the preceding year. In Indiana, the fiscal year runs from July 1 to June 30. This Act is intended to increase the transparency of federal government spending on transportation projects within a Metropolitan Planning Area (MPA). Lake, Porter and LaPorte Counties constitute this MPA. This report fulfills this requirement for the fiscal year 2018. The term obligation in this report is the federal government’s legal commitment to pay the federal share of a project’s eligible costs. An obligated project is one that has been authorized by the Federal Highway Agency (FHWA) or the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) as meeting certain eligibility requirements for federal funds. -
States' Support of Non-Highway Modes of Transportation
States’ Support of Non-Highway Modes of Transportation: Investigation and Synthesis by Chuck Knowles Research Coordinator Candice Wallace Research Associate Ben Blandford Research Associate Tim Brock Research Associate Andrew Martin Research Associate Kentucky Transportation Center College of Engineering University of Kentucky Lexington, Kentucky The contents of this report reflect the view of the authors who are responsible for the facts and accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the University of Kentucky. November 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................... ..................................... i LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................................................................ ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................... 1 CHAPTER 1: STUDY RATIONALE, OBJECTIVES, AND METHODOLOGY ............................................... 11 CHAPTER 2: AVIATION ..................................................................................................................................... 15 KENTUCKY .................................................................................................................................................... 18 ILLINOIS ........................................................................................................................................................ -
AECOM CSB SSL Feasibility Study Presentation
South Bend Station Alternatives Feasibility Study Findings April 19, 2018 AECOM Scope for City of South Bend Four Station Locations Four Tasks 1. Chocolate Factory (SWC 1. Technical / Physical US 20 & US 31) feasibility analysis 2. Honeywell Site a. Capital Costs 3. Amtrak Station Site b. O&M Costs 4. Downtown South Bend – 2. Ridership / Schedule near Union Station analysis 3. Economic Impacts analysis a. TOD / Real Estate potential b. Economic impacts 4. Final report / presentation materials April 19, 2018 2 Alternative Station Sites April 19, 2018 3 Travel Times and Ridership Comparative Travel Times, Fastest Train to Millennium Station 140 120 115 100 82 82 82 84 84 80 60 40 20 0 Chocolate Honeywell Amtrak Downtown Proposed Current Factory Realigned Airport Airport Station Station (Alt G) April 19, 2018 5 2040 Forecasted Daily Boardings by Station Location 800 729 731 735 727 698 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 Chocolate Honeywell Amtrak Downtown Proposed Factory Realigned Airport Station (Alt G) April 19, 2018 6 Capital and O&M Costs Capital Costs by SCC Category (in thousands of 2017 $) Proposed Realigned Airport Chocolate Station FTA Cost Category Factory Honeywell Amtrak Downtown (Alt G) 10 Guideway & Track Elements $7,537 $3,434 $3,552 $27,579 $4,424 20 Stations, Stops, Terminals $7,040 $7,040 $7,040 $7,040 $2,640 30 Support Facilities: Yards, Shops $776 $0 $3,559 $3,785 $0 40 Sitework & Special Conditions $5,324 $3,056 $4,115 $10,213 $3,854 50 Systems $7,636 $4,358 $5,759 $11,928 $7,949 CONSTRC SUBTOTAL (10-50) $28,312 $17,888 $24,024 $60,544 $18,866 60 ROW, Land, Existing Improvements $91 $200 $225 $5,400 $3,000 80 Professional Srvs. -
October 2017
May 2017 Error! No text of specified style in document. fff October 2017 September 2016 E r r o r ! No text of specified style in document. | i Indiana State Rail Plan Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................ S-1 S.1 PURPOSE OF THE INDIANA STATE RAIL PLAN .................................................................................................. S-1 S.2 VISION, GOALS AND OBJECTIVES ................................................................................................................. S-1 S.3 INDIANA RAIL NETWORK ............................................................................................................................ S-3 S.4 PASSENGER RAIL ISSUES, OPPORTUNITIES, PROPOSED INVESTMENTS AND IMPROVEMENTS ................................... S-7 S.5 SAFETY/CROSSING ISSUES, PROPOSED INVESTMENTS AND IMPROVEMENTS ....................................................... S-9 S.6 FREIGHT RAIL ISSUES, PROPOSED INVESTMENTS, AND IMPROVEMENTS .............................................................. S-9 S.7 RAIL SERVICE AND INVESTMENT PROGRAM ................................................................................................ S-12 1 THE ROLE OF RAIL IN STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION (OVERVIEW) ................................................ 1 1.1 PURPOSE AND CONTENT .............................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 MULTIMODAL -
The Michigan Passenger Welcomes Submissions on Passenger Rail Vacant Issues for Publication
Th e Michigan Passenger Your Source For Passenger Rail News Since 1973 Spring 2012 Volume 39, Number 2 Study looks for speed savings between Detroit and Chicago By Larry Sobczak Michigan, Indiana, Illinois and cials, an important focus of the The U.S. Department of the Norfolk Southern Railway study will be reducing conges- Transportation (USDOT) is un- will contribute $200,000 each. tion by linking a double track Michigan Association dertaking a new $4 million study “This is an important part- passenger main to the 110 mph of Railroad Passengers to reduce passenger and freight nership in our efforts to reinvent service at Porter. The study will www.marp.org rail congestion between De- Michigan, specifi cally creating build on progress Michigan has troit and Chicago along the high an accelerated rail connection already made by achieving 110 speed rail corridor. between Detroit and Chicago for mph service from Porter to Ka- WHAT’S lamazoo. The USDOT announced both citizens and businesses,” INSIDE May 4 that it will contribute $3.2 said Michigan Gov. Rick Snyder. “This is an important step million towards the study while According to USDOT offi - (See STUDY, page 8) Passengers head “south of the border” See Page 3 Meeting highlights See Page 4 Rewarding Amtrak adventure See Page 5 Celebrate National Train Day See Page 6 Grade crossing crashes discussed See Page 7 Amtrak and Canadian National trains meet in the city of Detroit. This is one of three areas in Michigan Recall targets transit that Amtrak claims it is delayed by the freight train operator. -
Trains the Train
BIKES ON RULES OF BIKE THE SOUTH BEND THE TRAIN TRAINS TRAILS Bicycling enthusiasts can take their bikes on labeled PERMITTED BIKES bike-friendly South Shore Line trains to better access Racks fit standard two-wheel bikes with a maximum Indiana Dunes Country and South Bend. From the front tire width of 2.5” and maximum distance from South Bend station, there are nearby trails and routes front axle to rear axle of 46” (wheel base). Permitted to get to the University of Nortre Dame Campus, bikes DO NOT include recumbent, tricycle, tandem, Potawatomi Zoo and many other area attractions. kiddie/cargo trailer or fat tires. EXERCISE CAUTION WHEN TO RIDE No riding on station platforms. Once on the train, the train will depart the station after passengers have Bike-friendly labeled cars will be available on select boarded. Please exercise caution as the train may days from April through October. For bike-friendly move before your bike is inserted in the rack. Push up trains and times, visit mysouthshoreline.com/bikes on the self-locking mechanism to release your bike. HOW TO RIDE TRAIN CREWS HAVE FINAL SAY Train crews have the final authority on accommodating bikes. Crews may prohibit a cyclist from boarding due 1 LOOK FOR LABELED TRAIN CAR to overcrowding. Bike-friendly train cars with bike racks are identified with the bike symbol prominently FIRST-COME, FIRST-SERVED located on the windows of the train car. Bikes will be handled on a first-come, first-served basis. Space is not guaranteed on an initial or 2 LOAD YOUR BIKE return trip (including late-night trains). -
Contents 12 | Geography of the Region 13 | Transportation Network Chapter 2: Regional Overview Michiana on the Move
Contents 12 | Geography of the Region 13 | Transportation Network Chapter 2: Regional Overview Michiana on the Move Figure 2-2: Region Location 2 Geography of the Region The MACOG region is located in North Central Indiana and consists The region is centrally located to several major cities in the Mid- of Elkhart, Kosciusko, Marshall and St. Joseph Counties. Two of the west. South Bend (the largest city in the region) is located 95 miles four counties (St. Joseph and Elkhart Counties) border the Michigan or two and a half (2 1/2) hours of drive time east of downtown Chi- state line. There are 35 cities and towns in the Michiana Area. Fig- cago, 155 miles or three (3) hours north of downtown Indianapo- ure 2-1 shows the population estimates for the largest communities lis, and 215 miles or three and a half (3 1/2) hours southwest of in each of the four counties. Detroit. Additionally, the region is approximately 35 miles or 45 minutes south east from Lake Michigan. Figure 2-1: 2013 Estimated Population Ranking of Cities and Towns 12 Chapter 2: Regional Overview 2040 Transportation Plan The MACOG region is home to several fascinating water resources. region, more than half being located within Kosciusko County. Many The region is unique in that its water resources drain into three ma- of these lakes are hot spots for recreation, such as Lake Wawasee, jor water body networks: the Great Lakes, the Mississippi River, and the largest lake wholly contained in Indiana. Below the surface, the only sole source aquifer in Indiana is located within Elkhart, Kos- St. -
^Dngagernentcrttngs
of Factiouul Strife "Mother Nurseries" Children to Fill morrow afternoon at tho Hotel Astor.' (lieprinttd from vetterday'* late editionti Plans Gonevieve Hampor nnd Genovieve Of Teachers To Be Further Work YOUR TOWN Reynolds will appear ln a scena from I May Baskets With "Komeo um! Juliot." Minnu Gule .Mi.*.,-* Hnynes n.i Udy Mucbeth will rea I the Drama Aired at I aiu-rlit on Emily Whcoler Expcols to letter scene nnd Dimes for Freneh than one Tom Wlio will nnpeur evldence ns Add to Day !lom<-s for ]%l'i'l;i:'" that spring Falstaff, here nnd that aumnier ia rnp- !New York Bables idly approaching can bc notod at varl< A pOSt*30S80n review bill of l'rov "I>«rk Rosaleen," a Horse Race ^Kadu-aP aml "Conserva-* io oua timos during thoao bulmy .lnv.i in incotown will be for day thousands of children are Funds Will Bo Rnised in ,'.»(> Central Park, All th- wook playi given one Play of Ireland, nt DREICER&CO Irft ln tho care of "stgna" are beglnntng to morrow at thc tive" Leaders Will d»y nurftorloa ln thero from oarly until ufti r i rovincetown Sprak New Vork while Stutea to Care for thc morning Playhouac, 133 Macdou thc Belasco thew mothcra rurn u dark, KSl Street. The pUys nre "The An, e! on Freedom in Schools at living. ln 18S0 the i tfomeleaa Little Onea Un¬ Tho morning houra l>rin<,: out the Intrudcs," by Floyd Doll; "Tho ftopo," day nursery as an lonjj rows of bnhy carriagea, trundlod by bugono o'Noill; "Tlcklesa Time," ^Dngagernentcrttngs Hotel insti¬ hy mir.se Rirls, who show of hav¬ by Susan and By Heywood Broun DIAMONDS OF SUPREME QUALITY McAlpin Saturday independent, til Parenta Can Itnihl of aigna Glaspsll Georgo Cram IN DKSIICEF* tution wns uii- ing pont mosl their time rec< ntly ''Ook, nnd "Cocalne," by Pendleton A good many typcs of plnys are SETTINGS known here. -
NEWS of ITALIAN CAPITAL-ACTIVITIES in RESORTS| Hotels and Restaurants Jorle Tompkins, Ruth Miles, Florence War Roberts, Emma Rlmonson
NEWS OF ITALIAN CAPITAL-ACTIVITIES IN RESORTS| Hotels and Restaurants Jorle Tompkins, Ruth Miles, Florence War Roberts, Emma Rlmonson. Grace Halz- Rome Forgets Staten Island niitn, Charlotte and Anna Kramer, Adall Rucka, May Mlldrum, Evelyn Gaston, for G ties of Amateurs Give Mildred and Florence Chappell, Ger¬ Klfiere to Pine Co-day aye trude Edwards, Fern Shaffer, Dorothy Mlldrum, Isabell Nelson, Helen Cleve¬ DANCING AND DINING. I DANCING AND DINING. Carnival Season ^Parade of 1922' land, Clara Macoy, and M&rle Engels- Kur.dallCo., 7286th *v., 4-J St. Tel. 2379 Bryant KendallCo., 7230thav.,42d 8t. Tel. 2379Bryant berg, Messrs. Frank Cleveland and Rob¬ ert Blair. Night Life Has Much the Same Entertainment Held for Bene¬ Mr. Albert E. Hurt and Mrs. Hart, who was Miss Gwynn Kavanagh, now Picturesque Glamor fit of Boy Scouts Camp are living In Bard avenue, havln* spent part of the winter In the South. LUNCHEONS.DINNERS SUPPERS.DANCING , as of Old. Fund.Social Notes. Mr. and Mrs. E. W. Jackson, who WOODMANSTRN INN sailed from England for New York on WmtrhPHlfr, N. Y. Wednesday, arrived at their homo In OPEN AM. YEAH. f-nt'ml Corrc.-ipondeuce to Tub New Yomk WITH a cast of 200 member*, in¬ Hulalu. New Dorp on Friday, They vp« lit two cluding many of Staten Isl¬ months in England. New Ilrntlil > .'\ GOOD PLACE ro KNOW-' York Bureau. and's rvTrvrxrr^n 1tonic. Mureh 15. ( prettiest arid most tal¬ Mr. and Mr*. Hormon Granger of Col¬ 67 West 52d St. DL RING carnival season for tho ented girls and matrons of society, lege r\ enui". -
Federal Register/Vol. 76, No. 143/Tuesday, July 26, 2011/Notices
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 26, 2011 / Notices 44655 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Administration, 200 West Adams, Suite Area of 1.13 acres, Undeveloped Land of 320, Chicago, IL 60606. 0.84 acres and Station Building of 5,890 Federal Transit Administration FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: square feet (the ‘‘Property’’). Cecelia Comito, Regional Counsel, at Transfer of Federally Assisted Land or The Northern Indiana Commuter 312/353–2789. Facility Transportation District (NICTD) requests SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: permission to transfer title to AGENCY: Federal Transit Administration, Background approximately 1.97 acres of property, United States Department of with a parking lot and one (1) Building 49 U.S.C. 5334(h) provides guidance Transportation. approximately 5900 square feet in South on the transfer of capital assets. ACTION: Notice of intent to transfer Bend, Indiana, to the National Railroad Federally assisted land or facility. Specifically, if a recipient of FTA assistance decides an asset acquired Passenger Corporation (Amtrak) free of SUMMARY: Section 5334(h) of the Federal under this chapter at least in part with charge for continued use as the Amtrak Transit Laws, as codified, 49 U.S.C. that assistance is no longer needed for Rail Passenger Station for South Bend. 5301, et seq., permits the Administrator the purpose for which it was acquired, This property was acquired by NICTD in of the Federal Transit Administration the Secretary of Transportation may 1989 through NICTD’s purchase of the (FTA) to authorize a recipient of FTA authorize the recipient to transfer the passenger assets of the bankrupt funds to transfer land or a facility to a asset to a local governmental authority Chicago, South Shore and South Bend public body for any public purpose with to be used for a public purpose with no Railroad; the purchase was financed, in no further obligation to the Federal further obligation to the Government. -
ADVERTISING POSSIBSLITIES of 77Ie HOTEL MCALPIN SERIES
call h'm names ou* occasions "Thr- t«d m* an the bark ^nd pet SAYS SUITOR RAN OFF ni Bls.'kwell's for a var And the MANirFACTITRF.R A BUICID1 enm* b«.-k '<> ""tva nnd tl to ritada al Martha Ing ta k*e|> wltnoBaaa oul of cr.utt. Sheriff "Taa" Polo**, on tholr way WITH FURNITURE CASH SETS if didn't coat a vou think th* st i.ouis eoavaation, aoal MURTHA th* for look nr me, Da TRAIMEN ilm glsd hand, NflW, genta. n.ver STRIKERSSULLEN; SPURN Metal Pollsh Man Harrlrsdes I«rtor. J. J. that'd waa Man Who Answered .ent mi 1- Ad" < ut*. I Gli ta were eonstantly in for Then hroat. said Miirtlui. »ttfc a ¦Nol" "lientlernen," -I'""* ti* {"r '"* mr or tfluehlng aeeu'tomed Irp*. Hutbaa- (int $300. lt Is Barrlcaded In the bath room ol I ".hmmie. Otaa di '. YARDSTICK OFFER 'EM UP FOR 'onming sehooner in hi* nght and M Martha, turnin** To the lalacl faa Murt AIlahjpH TAKEN Bt Bida, n ountj. Saj 3,000 continued Bay Que< gantlement" ' th* tale of hi* tinancial accon "flant FOURTEEN l<*f* ""han - <i n mo\n\ manofae a with his bartandor "i >"* nour Beat, poliah ng Henry Clay pose ments of the la'1 tWO yeara. 4.1 ed y ff)f 1T r* y trv.l i\ >'* bj after ¦.*, twa '." ne<>- I ¦".vor** ,''1 t« isnd. "I am haek amongst. you *".*F° ma Of hia arre.it he had Ogina Brotter, , .. with a raioi Ha th* narrow ioad. what'a twa ¦-..- ever man in I Gar- <.l bj the run.' Mr Former Police lnspector, he dirtiaat deal handed a his hom* ta Patrlek of Arrested Charge Working Arraige- ba'1' ij/it" a cus- and former member 8 *>aBBish Group leighboi had battared down tha his burg. -
2017 4Q IEDC Report
Smart | Connected | Communities REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN QUARTERLY PROGRESS REPORT 4Q 2017 c/o South Bend - Elkhart Regional Partnership 4477 Progress Drive, South Bend, IN 46628 574-400-5432 1 Table of Contents I. Regional Cities Initiative 1. RCI Active Project Status Overview 2. Updates on Active Funded Projects 3. List Non-Funded Projects II. Regional Development Authority 1. Operations 2. Regional Economic Development Strategy III. Attachments a. RDA Meeting Minutes i. November 9, 2017 ii. January 9, 2018 b. Subrecipient Agreements i. Project #03, IU South Bend/Elkhart Center ii. Project #20, The 500 Building c. Regional Economic Development Strategy Plan (updated Feb 2018) 2 ▪ A: RDP Projects – Recommended for Funding Allocation A: RDP Projects – RDP Projects: Funded and Active 02 Renaissance District Studebaker Factory Building 84. 3Q 2017 2Q 2017 Project Summary. This project will remove the most highly visible barrier for development in South Bend’s Innovation District by completing the restoration of the Studebaker Building 84 north facing façade. The project will also accelerate the redevelopment efforts of Studebaker 84 and enhance a complex that will serve as an economic magnet similar in relative scope to the American Tobacco Factory in Durham, North Carolina. 4Q ’17 Status Update. - Project Status: Demolition of the existing façade is underway. The next step will be a building scan and ordering the windows and related materials. The building owner has engaged Kite Realty/Stronbox to manage the construction, property management and leasing as they pursue their goal for a “density of technologist” locating in the Renaissance District. - Subrecipient Agreement and completion guarantee executed and sub grantee is in compliance with the agreement.