DOCSLIB.ORG

The Michigan Passenger Welcomes Submissions on Passenger Rail Vacant Issues for Publication

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Michigan Passenger Welcomes Submissions on Passenger Rail Vacant Issues for Publication Th e Michigan Passenger Your Source For Passenger Rail News Since 1973 Spring 2012 Volume 39, Number 2 Study looks for speed savings between Detroit and Chicago By Larry Sobczak Michigan, Indiana, Illinois and cials, an important focus of the The U.S. Department of the Norfolk Southern Railway study will be reducing conges- Transportation (USDOT) is un- will contribute $200,000 each. tion by linking a double track Michigan Association dertaking a new $4 million study “This is an important part- passenger main to the 110 mph of Railroad Passengers to reduce passenger and freight nership in our efforts to reinvent service at Porter. The study will www.marp.org rail congestion between De- Michigan, specifi cally creating build on progress Michigan has troit and Chicago along the high an accelerated rail connection already made by achieving 110 speed rail corridor. between Detroit and Chicago for mph service from Porter to Ka- WHAT’S lamazoo. The USDOT announced both citizens and businesses,” INSIDE May 4 that it will contribute $3.2 said Michigan Gov. Rick Snyder. “This is an important step million towards the study while According to USDOT offi - (See STUDY, page 8) Passengers head “south of the border” See Page 3 Meeting highlights See Page 4 Rewarding Amtrak adventure See Page 5 Celebrate National Train Day See Page 6 Grade crossing crashes discussed See Page 7 Amtrak and Canadian National trains meet in the city of Detroit. This is one of three areas in Michigan Recall targets transit that Amtrak claims it is delayed by the freight train operator. (Photo by Steve Sobel) center opponent See Page 8 Amtrak and CN argue about delays Amtrak and Canadian Na- verine service and a shorter sec- starting points without these bul- tional Railroad (CN) have asked tion of track in Battle Creek used letins) and failure to meet with the Surface Transportation Board by both the Blue Water and Wol- Amtrak to iron out problems. (STB) for a mediator to resolve a verine. Under the legislation that PAID 44870 dispute about Amtrak’s on-time The dispute began in Janu- transferred national passen- U.S. POSTAGE U.S. PRESORT STD. PRESORT PERMIT NO. 10 PERMIT NO. SANDUSKEY, OH SANDUSKEY, performance along CN’s rail- ary when Amtrak fi led a 46 page ger rail operations to Amtrak in roads in the U.S. including three complaint with the STB stating 1971, railroads hosting Amtrak segments in Michigan. that CN was purposely delaying are not supposed to give freight On March 27, Amtrak and passenger trains hosted on CN trains preference over passenger CN jointly fi led a motion before railroads throughout the U.S. trains. the STB requesting that STB The complaint details CN’s In its complaint, Amtrak delay action for 90 days and ap- poor performance and gives claims: point a mediator to supervise dis- many specifi c examples, point- cussions to resolve the issues. • CN failed to meet stan- ing out that CN delivers more dards for host-responsible Amtrak is hosted on three late trains than any other carrier delays for the Blue Water sections of CN-owned railroads in the country, by far. The ex- service in every single quar- Passengers on of Railroad Ɵ in Michigan including the Port amples include putting Amtrak ter of Fiscal Year 2011. CN’s Huron to Battle Creek segmen- on sidings in favor of freights, high delays contributed to tused by Amtrak’s Blue Water not providing Amtrak with daily the Blue Water’s failure to service, the Detroit to Pontiac operating bulletins (engineers meet the End Point OTP stan- railroad used by Amtrak’s Wol- are not allowed to leave their PO Box 532256 PO Box 48153-2256 Michigan Livonia, Michigan Associa Michigan (See ARGUE, page 8) Page 2 Th e Michigan Passenger Spring 2012 Michigan Association of Railroad Th e Michigan Passenger Passengers, Inc. is published four times annually by the Michigan Association of Railroad Passengers, Inc. OFFICERS Copyright © 2012 Michigan Association of Railroad Passengers, Inc. Chair All articles not originated by MARP are copyrighted by their Robert Tischbein respective originators. All rights reserved. Articles used in 586-726-9737 accordance with the Fair Use Clause of the United States [email protected] Constitution. Vice Chair The Michigan Passenger welcomes submissions on passenger rail Vacant issues for publication. Material sent for publication should be sent Secretary to our Editor at: [email protected] Hugh Gurney 517-545-2979 Clippings from newspapers and magazines must include the [email protected] publication’s name and date. Photos sent in by e-mail should be in JPEG format. Treasurer David Randall We reserve the right to edit all submissions. 248-924-4078 [email protected] To subscribe to this publication, join MARP by fi lling out the application below. All MARP members receive a copy of this REGIONAL CHAIRS publication sent to their home or business. Metro Detroit Michigan Passenger Editor: Jim Hinkins Larry Sobczak, larrysobczak@hotmail. com 313-881-6258 586-781-6891 [email protected] Contributors: East/Central Michigan John DeLora Jim Wallington, acting Hugh Gurney 517-303-6038 [email protected] Nathan Nietering Steve Sobel West Michigan Mike Whims John D. Langdon, acting 616-218-9009 [email protected] About MARP… Northern Michigan The Michigan Association of Railroad Passengers, Inc. (MARP) Don Monteith was established in 1973 as a consumer advocacy group to improve 231-547-6854 intercity rail and bus service, improve local transit and encourage [email protected] the preservation of historic railroad stations. AT-LARGE EXECUTIVES MARP is not affi liated with Amtrak, the railroads, governments or John D. Langdon any political party. MARP is incorporated as a Michigan non-profi t 616-218-9009 organization and is exempt from federal income tax under the IRS [email protected] code, 501( c )(3) as a charitable educational organization. Dues and donations to MARP may be tax-deductible in accordance with the Jim Wallington IRS code. 517-303-6038 [email protected] MARP is an all-volunteer organization. Its membership consists of passengers and citizens who want a viable, balanced transportation Kay M. Chase system in Michigan. We can all use the help we can get! 269-388-3777 [email protected] http://www.marp.org [email protected] Kathleen Newell http://www.facebook.com/pages/michigan-association-of-railroad-passengers 310-740-0421 [email protected] http://twitter.com/michrailpass Membership Application Clip this form and mail your check or money order to: Michigan Association of Railroad Passengers, PO Box 532256, Livonia, MI 48153-2256 Name: ____________________________________________________ MEMBERSHIP DUES ___ Contact me, I want to be active! ___ Please send me information about Address: _______________________________________ Unit: ______ the National Association of Railroad Student (under 21) $15 Passengers City:___________________________ State: _____ Zip: ___________ Seniors (65+) $15 ___ I want to be notifi ed no more than Individual $25 4 times per year by email or phone Phone: (____) ____________________ Family $30 when critical issues arrise Email: ___________________________________________________ Advocate $50 Total Dues: __________ * We do not sell, rent or trade email addresses. We use emails for important time-sensitive news First Class $100 Additional Donation __________ and when urgent phone calls are needed for elected offi cials. Lifetime $500 TOTAL ENCLOSED:__________ Spring 2012 Th e Michigan Passenger Page 3 Michigan residents help boost ridership at Ohio and Indiana Amtrak stations By Nathan Nietering Amtrak stations just “south of the border” in northern Indi- ana and Ohio provide a travel choice not just for their home states, but for passengers from southern Michigan. These stations include Tole- do, Ohio, and Waterloo, Elkhart, and South Bend, Indiana. All are served by Amtrak’s long-dis- tance Capitol Limited and Lake Shore Limited, which connect Chicago with points on the east coast. Both trains provide full sleeping and dining cars in addi- tion to coach cars on their routes. An Amtrak train arrives at the Elkhart station. (Photo by Nathan Nietering) Michigan tabulated record Amtrak ridership during Fiscal offered. the town was awarded a federal increased nearly every year, and Year 2011, with over 880,000 Ridership has increased for 2010 grant for $1.8 million to ex- has since surpassed the 2000 boardings and alightings at the several years at this station, with tend the platform, add new plat- level, to reach 17,070 in 2011, state’s twenty-two stations. a count of 66,413 passengers in form lighting, meet ADA com- nearly three times the 2003 level. Michigan residents also contrib- 2011. This increase is in part pliance, and open a portion of Given Elkhart’s fairly close uted to another increase in Am- due to the guaranteed Amtrak the restored station building for proximity to US-131, passen- trak station use, just beyond the Thruway bus connection from Amtrak passenger use. gers come from as far away as state line. Michigan (The Michigan Pas- At the present time, the town Kalamazoo and Grand Rapids to Stations “south of the border” senger, Winter 2009). This pro- is working through the fi nal de- travel out of the Elkhart station. have also seen an increase in rid- vides a daily connection from the tails of the plan with the US- Today, the waiting room is ership. Considering many travel- Amtrak stations in East Lansing, DOT and Amtrak, according to open at train time in the morning lers are from Michigan, it could Ann Arbor, Dearborn and De- DeWayne Nodine, Town Man- and evening, and is well looked mean travelers meandered to troit with the eastbound Capitol ager of Waterloo. Amtrak’s plan after by the volunteer caretaker.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Annual List of Obligated Projects
    Annual Listing of Obligated Projects Fiscal Year - 2018 6100 Southport Road Portage, IN 46368 www.nirpc.org Annual Listing of Obligated Projects – FY 2018 Introduction The Northwestern Indiana Regional Planning Commission (NIRPC) is a regional council of local governments serving the citizens of Lake, Porter, and LaPorte counties in Northwest Indiana. It is organized under the provisions of Indiana Code 36-7-7.6. NIRPC also serves as the Metropolitan Planning Organization for these three counties. The FAST Act (Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act) was signed into law by President Barack Obama in 2015. This act provides long term funding certainty for surface transportation infrastructure planning and investment. The act continues (from the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century- MAP 21) the requirement that Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPO’s) prepare an annual list of projects in which federal funds have been obligated for in the preceding year (23 U.S.C. of 49 U.S.C. Chapter 53). The Act further states that this list must be published within 90 days of the close of the preceding year. In Indiana, the fiscal year runs from July 1 to June 30. This Act is intended to increase the transparency of federal government spending on transportation projects within a Metropolitan Planning Area (MPA). Lake, Porter and LaPorte Counties constitute this MPA. This report fulfills this requirement for the fiscal year 2018. The term obligation in this report is the federal government’s legal commitment to pay the federal share of a project’s eligible costs. An obligated project is one that has been authorized by the Federal Highway Agency (FHWA) or the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) as meeting certain eligibility requirements for federal funds.
    [Show full text]
  • States' Support of Non-Highway Modes of Transportation
    States’ Support of Non-Highway Modes of Transportation: Investigation and Synthesis by Chuck Knowles Research Coordinator Candice Wallace Research Associate Ben Blandford Research Associate Tim Brock Research Associate Andrew Martin Research Associate Kentucky Transportation Center College of Engineering University of Kentucky Lexington, Kentucky The contents of this report reflect the view of the authors who are responsible for the facts and accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the University of Kentucky. November 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................... ..................................... i LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................................................................ ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................... 1 CHAPTER 1: STUDY RATIONALE, OBJECTIVES, AND METHODOLOGY ............................................... 11 CHAPTER 2: AVIATION ..................................................................................................................................... 15 KENTUCKY .................................................................................................................................................... 18 ILLINOIS ........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • AECOM CSB SSL Feasibility Study Presentation
    South Bend Station Alternatives Feasibility Study Findings April 19, 2018 AECOM Scope for City of South Bend Four Station Locations Four Tasks 1. Chocolate Factory (SWC 1. Technical / Physical US 20 & US 31) feasibility analysis 2. Honeywell Site a. Capital Costs 3. Amtrak Station Site b. O&M Costs 4. Downtown South Bend – 2. Ridership / Schedule near Union Station analysis 3. Economic Impacts analysis a. TOD / Real Estate potential b. Economic impacts 4. Final report / presentation materials April 19, 2018 2 Alternative Station Sites April 19, 2018 3 Travel Times and Ridership Comparative Travel Times, Fastest Train to Millennium Station 140 120 115 100 82 82 82 84 84 80 60 40 20 0 Chocolate Honeywell Amtrak Downtown Proposed Current Factory Realigned Airport Airport Station Station (Alt G) April 19, 2018 5 2040 Forecasted Daily Boardings by Station Location 800 729 731 735 727 698 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 Chocolate Honeywell Amtrak Downtown Proposed Factory Realigned Airport Station (Alt G) April 19, 2018 6 Capital and O&M Costs Capital Costs by SCC Category (in thousands of 2017 $) Proposed Realigned Airport Chocolate Station FTA Cost Category Factory Honeywell Amtrak Downtown (Alt G) 10 Guideway & Track Elements $7,537 $3,434 $3,552 $27,579 $4,424 20 Stations, Stops, Terminals $7,040 $7,040 $7,040 $7,040 $2,640 30 Support Facilities: Yards, Shops $776 $0 $3,559 $3,785 $0 40 Sitework & Special Conditions $5,324 $3,056 $4,115 $10,213 $3,854 50 Systems $7,636 $4,358 $5,759 $11,928 $7,949 CONSTRC SUBTOTAL (10-50) $28,312 $17,888 $24,024 $60,544 $18,866 60 ROW, Land, Existing Improvements $91 $200 $225 $5,400 $3,000 80 Professional Srvs.
    [Show full text]
  • Downtown Detroit to Metro Airport Rail Study
    Downtown Detroit to Metro Airport Rail Study Downtown Detroit to Metro Airport Rail Study PHASE I REPORT Downtown Detroit to Metro Airport Rail Study TT AA BB LL EE OO FF CC OO NN TT EE NN TT SS Section 1 – Data Collection & Application 1.1 Introduction 1.2 Purpose 1.3 Overview of Data Required 1.4 Application Section 2 – Peer Group Analysis 2.1 Introduction 2.2 Purpose 2.3 Overview of Peer Group Analysis 2.4 Conclusion Section 3 – Institutional Issues 3.1 Introduction 3.2 Purpose 3.3 Overview of Institutional Issues A. Organizational Issues B. Process Issues C. Implementation Issues 3.4 Summary Institutional Recommendations Appendix • DDMA Rail Study – Peer Property Reference List Downtown Detroit to Metro Airport Rail Study TOC-1 List of Tables Table 1-1 Data Application Table 2-1 Peer Group Data Table 3-1 Procurement of Services Table 3-2 Virginia Railway Express Insurance Table 3-3 Commuter Rail Systems and Sponsors Table 3-4 Funding Sources Table 3-5 Advantages and Disadvantages of Existing Agencies as Sponsor of Proposed Rail Passenger Service List of Figures Figure 3-1 Risk, Liability and Insurance of Railroad Operations Downtown Detroit to Metro Airport Rail Study TOC-2 1 DD AA TT AA CC OO LL LL EE CC TT II OO NN && AA PP PP LL II CC AA TT II OO NN 1.1 INTRODUCTION The usefulness of virtually any study is directly related to the quality of the input or source material available. This is certainly true for the Downtown Detroit to Metro Airport Rail Study.
    [Show full text]
  • October 2017
    May 2017 Error! No text of specified style in document. fff October 2017 September 2016 E r r o r ! No text of specified style in document. | i Indiana State Rail Plan Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................ S-1 S.1 PURPOSE OF THE INDIANA STATE RAIL PLAN .................................................................................................. S-1 S.2 VISION, GOALS AND OBJECTIVES ................................................................................................................. S-1 S.3 INDIANA RAIL NETWORK ............................................................................................................................ S-3 S.4 PASSENGER RAIL ISSUES, OPPORTUNITIES, PROPOSED INVESTMENTS AND IMPROVEMENTS ................................... S-7 S.5 SAFETY/CROSSING ISSUES, PROPOSED INVESTMENTS AND IMPROVEMENTS ....................................................... S-9 S.6 FREIGHT RAIL ISSUES, PROPOSED INVESTMENTS, AND IMPROVEMENTS .............................................................. S-9 S.7 RAIL SERVICE AND INVESTMENT PROGRAM ................................................................................................ S-12 1 THE ROLE OF RAIL IN STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION (OVERVIEW) ................................................ 1 1.1 PURPOSE AND CONTENT .............................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 MULTIMODAL
    [Show full text]
  • MDOT Michigan State Rail Plan Tech Memo 2 Existing Conditions
    Technical Memorandum #2 March 2011 Prepared for: Prepared by: HNTB Corporation Table of Contents 1. Introduction ..............................................................................................................1 2. Freight Rail System Profile ......................................................................................2 2.1. Overview ...........................................................................................................2 2.2. Class I Railroads ...............................................................................................2 2.3. Regional Railroads ............................................................................................6 2.4. Class III Shortline Railroads .............................................................................7 2.5. Switching & Terminal Railroads ....................................................................12 2.7. State Owned Railroads ...................................................................................16 2.8. Abandonments ................................................................................................18 2.10. International Border Crossings .....................................................................22 2.11. Ongoing Border Crossing Activities .............................................................24 2.12. Port Access Facilities ....................................................................................24 3. Freight Rail Traffic ................................................................................................25
    [Show full text]
  • (Amtrak) PTC Implementation Plan Revised July 16, 2010
    National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak) PTC Implementation Plan Revised July 16, 2010 Revision2.0 Submitted in fulfillment of 49 CFR Part 236, Subpart I, § 236.1011 Revision History AmtrakPTCIP.doc Date Revision Description Author 4/12/10 0.1 Release for internal comments E. K. Holt 4/16/10 1.0 Release to FRA E. K. Holt Revised per FRA comments of 6/18/10 E. K. Holt PTCIP, Appendix A and Appendix B 7/16/10 2.0 revised i PTC Implementation Plan Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction................................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Amtrak Background.................................................................................................. 5 1.2 Overview of Amtrak Operations......................................................................... 6 1.2.1 Northeast Corridor ...................................................................................... 7 1.2.2 Northeast Corridor Feeder Lines ................................................................ 8 1.2.2.1 Keystone Corridor (Harrisburg Line) ......................................................... 8 1.2.2.2 Empire Connection ..................................................................................... 8 1.2.2.3 Springfield Line .......................................................................................... 9 1.2.3 The Michigan Line.......................................................................................... 9 1.2.4 Chicago Terminal.......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Trains the Train
    BIKES ON RULES OF BIKE THE SOUTH BEND THE TRAIN TRAINS TRAILS Bicycling enthusiasts can take their bikes on labeled PERMITTED BIKES bike-friendly South Shore Line trains to better access Racks fit standard two-wheel bikes with a maximum Indiana Dunes Country and South Bend. From the front tire width of 2.5” and maximum distance from South Bend station, there are nearby trails and routes front axle to rear axle of 46” (wheel base). Permitted to get to the University of Nortre Dame Campus, bikes DO NOT include recumbent, tricycle, tandem, Potawatomi Zoo and many other area attractions. kiddie/cargo trailer or fat tires. EXERCISE CAUTION WHEN TO RIDE No riding on station platforms. Once on the train, the train will depart the station after passengers have Bike-friendly labeled cars will be available on select boarded. Please exercise caution as the train may days from April through October. For bike-friendly move before your bike is inserted in the rack. Push up trains and times, visit mysouthshoreline.com/bikes on the self-locking mechanism to release your bike. HOW TO RIDE TRAIN CREWS HAVE FINAL SAY Train crews have the final authority on accommodating bikes. Crews may prohibit a cyclist from boarding due 1 LOOK FOR LABELED TRAIN CAR to overcrowding. Bike-friendly train cars with bike racks are identified with the bike symbol prominently FIRST-COME, FIRST-SERVED located on the windows of the train car. Bikes will be handled on a first-come, first-served basis. Space is not guaranteed on an initial or 2 LOAD YOUR BIKE return trip (including late-night trains).
    [Show full text]
  • Contents 12 | Geography of the Region 13 | Transportation Network Chapter 2: Regional Overview Michiana on the Move
    Contents 12 | Geography of the Region 13 | Transportation Network Chapter 2: Regional Overview Michiana on the Move Figure 2-2: Region Location 2 Geography of the Region The MACOG region is located in North Central Indiana and consists The region is centrally located to several major cities in the Mid- of Elkhart, Kosciusko, Marshall and St. Joseph Counties. Two of the west. South Bend (the largest city in the region) is located 95 miles four counties (St. Joseph and Elkhart Counties) border the Michigan or two and a half (2 1/2) hours of drive time east of downtown Chi- state line. There are 35 cities and towns in the Michiana Area. Fig- cago, 155 miles or three (3) hours north of downtown Indianapo- ure 2-1 shows the population estimates for the largest communities lis, and 215 miles or three and a half (3 1/2) hours southwest of in each of the four counties. Detroit. Additionally, the region is approximately 35 miles or 45 minutes south east from Lake Michigan. Figure 2-1: 2013 Estimated Population Ranking of Cities and Towns 12 Chapter 2: Regional Overview 2040 Transportation Plan The MACOG region is home to several fascinating water resources. region, more than half being located within Kosciusko County. Many The region is unique in that its water resources drain into three ma- of these lakes are hot spots for recreation, such as Lake Wawasee, jor water body networks: the Great Lakes, the Mississippi River, and the largest lake wholly contained in Indiana. Below the surface, the only sole source aquifer in Indiana is located within Elkhart, Kos- St.
    [Show full text]
  • Michigan Crude Oil Production: Alternatives to Enbridge Line 5 for Transportation
    MICHIGAN CRUDE OIL PRODUCTION: ALTERNATIVES TO ENBRIDGE LINE 5 FOR TRANSPORTATION Prepared for National Wildlife Federation By London Economics International LLC 717 Atlantic Ave, Suite 1A Boston, MA, 02111 August 23, 2018 Michigan crude oil production: Alternatives to Enbridge Line 5 for transportation Prepared by London Economics International LLC August 23, 2018 London Economics International LLC (“LEI”) was retained by the National Wildlife Federation (“NWF”) via a grant from the Charles Stewart Mott Foundation, to examine alternatives to Enbridge Energy, Limited Partnership (“Enbridge”) Line 5 for crude oil producers in Michigan. About sixty-five percent of the crude oil produced in Michigan currently uses Enbridge Line 5 to reach markets. This production is located in the Northern and Central regions of the Lower Peninsula. Oil production from the Southern region of the Lower Peninsula does not use Enbridge Line 5 to reach markets. LEI’s key findings are that the lowest-cost alternative to Enbridge Line 5 would be trucking from oil wells to the Marysville market area. LEI estimates that the increase in transportation cost to oil producers in the Northern region would be $1.31 per barrel based on recent oil production levels and recent trucking costs. For the Central region, the cost increase on average would be less, as these producers are located closer to markets. There would be no impact on Southern region producers. The $1.31 per barrel cost increase amounts to 2.6 percent of a crude oil price of $50 per barrel. It is much smaller than typical monthly swings in Michigan crude oil prices, which have ranged from $28 per barrel to over $100 per barrel from 2014 through 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • Michigan's Railroad History
    Contributing Organizations The Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT) wishes to thank the many railroad historical organizations and individuals who contributed to the development of this document, which will update continually. Ann Arbor Railroad Technical and Historical Association Blue Water Michigan Chapter-National Railway Historical Society Detroit People Mover Detroit Public Library Grand Trunk Western Historical Society HistoricDetroit.org Huron Valley Railroad Historical Society Lansing Model Railroad Club Michigan Roundtable, The Lexington Group in Transportation History Michigan Association of Railroad Passengers Michigan Railroads Association Peaker Services, Inc. - Brighton, Michigan Michigan Railroad History Museum - Durand, Michigan The Michigan Railroad Club The Michigan State Trust for Railroad Preservation The Southern Michigan Railroad Society S O October 13, 2014 Dear Michigan Residents: For more than 180 years, Michigan’s railroads have played a major role in the economic development of the state. This document highlights many important events that have occurred in the evolution of railroad transportation in Michigan. This document was originally published to help celebrate Michigan’s 150th birthday in 1987. A number of organizations and individuals contributed to its development at that time. The document has continued to be used by many since that time, so a decision was made to bring it up to date and keep the information current. Consequently, some 28 years later, the Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT) has updated the original document and is placing it on our website for all to access. As you journey through this history of railroading in Michigan, may you find the experience both entertaining and beneficial. MDOT is certainly proud of Michigan’s railroad heritage.
    [Show full text]
  • 100244 MRA Spring Newsletter.Indd
    A publication of the Michigan Railroads Association SPRING 2010 Federal Positive Train Control Mandate To Be Implemented By 2015 In October 2008 the U.S. Congress passed What is Positive Train Control? example, if a train operator fails to stop a and the President signed the Rail Safety • “Positive train control” (PTC) describes train at a stop signal, the PTC system would Improvement Act (RSIA) which requires technologies being designed and developed apply the brakes automatically. the large U.S. railroads (Class I railroads) to by numerous private fi rms and sold to • Railroads have spent hundreds of millions of install positive train control (PTC) systems by railroad companies that automatically stop the end of 2015 on tracks that carry passengers dollars testing and evaluating different types or slow a train before certain accidents of PTC systems, but it’s still an emerging or certain hazardous materials. Additionally, occur. In particular, PTC is designed to Amtrak and 22 commuter railroads will be technology. To ensure the technology is prevent train-to-train collisions, derailments fully functional and completely safe, much required to install PTC on their rail systems. caused by excessive speed, unauthorized This past December the Federal Railroad more development and testing are needed. incursions by trains onto sections of track Most critical is developing sophisticated, Administration (FRA) issued a fi nal rule where repairs are being made, and movement guiding implementation of PTC. reliable software that can take into account of a train through a track switch left in the the complexities of rail operations. The wrong position.
    [Show full text]