DOCSLIB.ORG

Complete the Following Questions Using the Links Listed Below. Http

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Complete the Following Questions Using the Links Listed Below. Http Social Studies Name: _______________________ Directions: Complete the following questions using the links listed below. http://www.history.com/topics/ancient-history/alexander-the-great 1. During what timeframe did Alexander the Great live? 2. Cavalry commander at age ____________, king at ____________, conqueror of the Persian Empire at ______________, explorer of the Indian frontier at ____________, Alexander the Great died before his thirty-third birthday. 3. According to the website, what is significant about the accomplishments of Alexander the Great when considering his age? 1 ©Copyright Brodie Millar 2014. (http://www.teacherspayteachers.com/Store/Brodie-Millar) 4. Alexander the Great’s defeat of the Persian Empire was a significant historical event. a. According to the website, why was this such a significant event in terms of Alexander the Great’s legacy? b. The website refers to the importance of the event as “unintended”. What does it mean by this? 5. What qualities made Alexander the Great a “genius” military leader? 6. Explain how he carefully took control of Persia. 7. What were the three setbacks that Alexander the Great suffered? 2 ©Copyright Brodie Millar 2014. (http://www.teacherspayteachers.com/Store/Brodie-Millar) 8. Explain the impact that Alexander the Great had on other leaders in history. 9. The website suggests that Alexander the Great was not admired in his own time. Why do you suppose this was? 10. In the end, why did Alexander the Great seem to carry out his grand conquests? 3 ©Copyright Brodie Millar 2014. (http://www.teacherspayteachers.com/Store/Brodie-Millar) Teachers Key Name: _______________________ Directions: Complete the following questions using the links listed below. http://www.history.com/topics/ancient-history/alexander-the-great 1. During what timeframe did Alexander the Great live? 356-323 BC 2. Cavalry commander at age eighteen, king at twenty, conqueror of the Persian Empire at twenty-six, explorer of the Indian frontier at thirty, Alexander the Great died before his thirty-third birthday. 3. According to the website, what is significant about the accomplishments of Alexander the Great when considering his age? The fact that he accomplished what he did and as much as he did while still being a relatively young age. 4 ©Copyright Brodie Millar 2014. (http://www.teacherspayteachers.com/Store/Brodie-Millar) 4. Alexander the Great’s defeat of the Persian Empire was a significant historical event. a. According to the website, why was this such a significant event in terms of Alexander the Great’s legacy? He was able to spread Macedonian culture further east than ever before, and changed the course of history in the area as Macedonian culture combined with Persian culture. b. The website refers to the importance of the event as “unintended”. What does it mean by this? The idea that Alexander the Great did not intend to leave a legacy of Macedonian culture in the Middle East, but it occurred anyways and is one of his most lasting legacies. 5. What qualities made Alexander the Great a “genius” military leader? He improved the fine army inherited from his father, Philip, by the addition of allied forces; he strengthened the cavalry arm, utilized weapons specialists, and employed a corps of engineers; he was invincible in both siege warfare and set battles. His movements were marked by speed; his logistical, intelligence, and communications operations were flawless; and his ability to improvise was unrivaled. 6. Explain how he carefully took control of Persia. He was careful in strategy: rather than strike deep into Asia immediately, he spent nearly two years securing the coastal areas of Asia Minor and the Levant in order to ensure that Persian naval forces would not interdict his lines to Europe. Bit by bit he wore away the western sections of the Persian Empire before driving into Mesopotamia and the Iranian plateau. 7. What were the three setbacks that Alexander the Great suffered? Only three setbacks checked his progress. Along the Indian frontier his officers refused to march farther east, and, after his return to Babylonia, his Macedonian troops mutinied against the integration of Asian troops into the ranks. The third episode was the horrible loss of personnel in the Makran desert on the return march from India to the Persian Gulf, where lack of water and food accomplished what no enemy army had been able to do. 5 ©Copyright Brodie Millar 2014. (http://www.teacherspayteachers.com/Store/Brodie-Millar) 8. Explain the impact that Alexander the Great had on other leaders in history. Alexander’s conquests created a legend that would provide the standard by which other leaders measured their careers. Kings, generals, and emperors discovered that they were unable to compete with the legend and turned to emulation— Antiochus the Great, Pompey the Great, Nero, Caracalla, Severus Alexander, and Charlemagne, to mention a few—and Alexander’s career as a metaphor for achievement has reached even into modern times. 9. The website suggests that Alexander the Great was not admired in his own time. Why do you suppose this was? Alexander the Great conquered and ruled over many different groups of people. Likely, many of these people did not appreciate being ruled over by Alexander the Great and his armies, and resented his leadership. 10. In the end, why did Alexander the Great seem to carry out his grand conquests? In the end, his achievement appears to have been a grand adventure tied to his own personal ambitions—conquest for its own sake. 6 ©Copyright Brodie Millar 2014. (http://www.teacherspayteachers.com/Store/Brodie-Millar) .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • T C K a P R (E F C Bc): C P R
    ELECTRUM * Vol. 23 (2016): 25–49 doi: 10.4467/20800909EL.16.002.5821 www.ejournals.eu/electrum T C K A P R (E F C BC): C P R S1 Christian Körner Universität Bern For Andreas Mehl, with deep gratitude Abstract: At the end of the eighth century, Cyprus came under Assyrian control. For the follow- ing four centuries, the Cypriot monarchs were confronted with the power of the Near Eastern empires. This essay focuses on the relations between the Cypriot kings and the Near Eastern Great Kings from the eighth to the fourth century BC. To understand these relations, two theoretical concepts are applied: the centre-periphery model and the concept of suzerainty. From the central perspective of the Assyrian and Persian empires, Cyprus was situated on the western periphery. Therefore, the local governing traditions were respected by the Assyrian and Persian masters, as long as the petty kings fulfi lled their duties by paying tributes and providing military support when requested to do so. The personal relationship between the Cypriot kings and their masters can best be described as one of suzerainty, where the rulers submitted to a superior ruler, but still retained some autonomy. This relationship was far from being stable, which could lead to manifold mis- understandings between centre and periphery. In this essay, the ways in which suzerainty worked are discussed using several examples of the relations between Cypriot kings and their masters. Key words: Assyria, Persia, Cyprus, Cypriot kings. At the end of the fourth century BC, all the Cypriot kingdoms vanished during the wars of Alexander’s successors Ptolemy and Antigonus, who struggled for control of the is- land.
    [Show full text]
  • The Deadly Styx River and the Death of Alexander
    Princeton/Stanford Working Papers in Classics The Deadly Styx River and the Death of Alexander Version 1.3 May 2011 Adrienne Mayor Stanford University and Antoinette Hayes Pfizer Pharmaeuticals Abstract: Plutarch, Arrian, Diodorus, Justin, and other ancient historians report that rumors of poisoning arose after the death of Alexander in Babylon in 323 BC. Alexander’s close friends suspected a legendary poison gathered from the River Styx in Arcadia, so corrosive that only the hoof of a horse could contain it. It’s impossible to know the real cause of Alexander’s death, but a recent toxicological discovery may help explain why some ancient observers believed that Alexander was murdered with Styx poison. We propose that the river harbored a killer bacterium that can occur on limestone rock deposits. This paper elaborates on our Poster presentation, Toxicological History Room, XII International Congress of Toxicology, Barcelona, 19-23 July 2010, and Society of Toxicology Annual Meeting, Washington DC, March 2011. © Adrienne Mayor. [email protected] 2 THE DEADLY STYX RIVER and the DEATH OF ALEXANDER THE GREAT Adrienne Mayor and Antoinette Hayes According to several ancient historians, rumors of poisoning circulated after the death of Alexander, at age 32, in Babylon in 323 BC (Bosworth 1971 and 2010; Lane Fox 2004). Some close friends suspected a legendary poison gathered from the Styx waterfall near Nonacris in Arcadia (north central Peloponnese, Greece), a substance reputed to be so corrosive it could only be contained in the hoof of a horse. Many ancient and modern writers have speculated on the true cause of Alexander’s death, which remains an unsolved mystery.
    [Show full text]
  • Descarregar (3.403Mb)
    The Numismatic Chronicle 178 Offprint COIN HOARDS ANCIENT 1. A Small Hoard of Alexander Tetradrachms from Batman (Turkey) by DAVID MARTÍNEZ CHICO and ALBERTO GONZÁLEZ GARCÍA L O N D O N THE ROYAL NUMISMATIC SOCIETY 2 0 1 8 ANCIENT 285 COIN HOARDS 2018 ANCIENT HOARDS 1. A Small Hoard of Alexander Tetradrachms from Batman (Turkey) DAVID MARTÍNEZ CHICO and ALBERTO GONZÁLEZ GARCÍA 1 [PLATES 21-22] Introduction In January 2018 a Turkish collector informed us of a small hoard of 15 Alexander the Great tetradrachms (none in the name of Philip III), found by a farmer on the surface of private land on the outskirts of Batman in south-east Turkey, probably in 2017. No container was recorded; if there had been one, it must have been of perishable material, like a leather or cloth bag. The state of preservation of the pieces is good, although many show some wear. Some of the tetradrachms showed their original dark patina at the time when they were photographed and weighed. Some are half-cleaned, others completely cleaned, since the finder wanted to sell the coins quickly. We suggest below that the hoard could be related to the demobilized soldiers of Craterus and/or the First War of the Diadochi (321 BC). Alexander hoards from Anatolia of the late fourth century BC are of particular interest because of their scarcity and historical importance. Despite the difficulties in information retrieval, the Turkish collector said that the hoard was complete. We cannot of course guarantee this, and the group could perhaps be only a part of the total found.
    [Show full text]
  • JOHN WALSH, Antipater and Early Hellenistic Literature
    Antipater and Early Hellenistic Literature* John Walsh INTRODUCTION It is well known that there was a flowering of Greek literature under Alexander and in the period after his death – at least in terms of the quantity of works, even if some may dispute the quality. A vast array of histories, memoirs, pamphlets, geographical literature, philosophical treatises, and poetry was written during this period, and the political fate of the Greek world in its domination by Macedon and the Successor kingdoms was tied to an increasing tendency for kings to be patrons of literature. Many works were now produced at royal courts, under the patronage of the Successors or by partisan individuals who had served under various kings.1 Antipater, Alexander’s regent in Macedonia, has a neglected but interesting connection with literature in the early Hellenistic era. Antipater was certainly overshadowed by both Philip and Alexander, and the other Diadochs, and his place in the development of Hellenistic intellectualism and literature has been overlooked in modern scholarship. First, in Sections I and II below, I show that Antipater, as Philip had done before him, had a role in the development of Hellenistic literature and was himself an author. There were also intriguing, if speculative, connections between Antipater’s court and the emerging tradition of historical epic. Secondly, in Section III, I trace how Antipater suffered unduly from hostile historiographical traditions directed at him by the propaganda of rival Diadochs, particularly those produced under Ptolemy and the Antigonid partisan Hieronymus of Cardia. I. ANTIPATER’S WORKS2 A passage in the Suda provides some tantalising evidence of Antipater as a writer of history and letters: Antipater was the son of Iolaus, of the city Paliura in Macedonia.
    [Show full text]
  • John Walsh, Antipater and the Lamian War: a Study in 4Th Century Macedonian Counterinsurgency Doctrine
    The Ancient History Bulletin VOLUME TWENTY-NINE: 2015 NUMBERS 1-2 Edited by: Edward Anson ò Michael Fronda òDavid Hollander Timothy Howe òJoseph Roisman ò John Vanderspoel Pat Wheatley ò Sabine Müller ISSN 0835-3638 ANCIENT HISTORY BULLETIN Volume 29 (2015) Numbers 1-2 Edited by: Edward Anson, Michael Fronda, David Hollander, Sabine Müller, Joseph Roisman, John Vanderspoel, Pat Wheatley Senior Editor: Timothy Howe Editorial correspondents Elizabeth Baynham, Hugh Bowden, Franca Landucci Gattinoni, Alexander Meeus, Kurt Raaflaub, P.J. Rhodes, Robert Rollinger, Victor Alonso Troncoso Contents of volume twenty-nine Numbers 1-2 1 John Walsh, Antipater and the Lamian War: A Study in 4th Century Macedonian Counterinsurgency Doctrine 28 Nikos Karkavelias, The End of the Four Hundred Regime 57 Eloisa Paganoni, Bithynia in Memnon’s Perì Herakleias: A Case Study for a Reappraisal of Old and New Proposals Review Article 80 Thomas Scanlon, Satan’s Business or the People’s Choice: The Decline of Athletics in Late Antiquity NOTES TO CONTRIBUTORS AND SUBSCRIBERS The Ancient History Bulletin was founded in 1987 by Waldemar Heckel, Brian Lavelle, and John Vanderspoel. The board of editorial correspondents consists of Elizabeth Baynham (University of Newcastle), Hugh Bowden (Kings College, London), Franca Landucci Gattinoni (Università Cattolica, Milan), Alexander Meeus (University of Leuven), Kurt Raaflaub (Brown University), P.J. Rhodes (Durham University), Robert Rollinger (Universität Innsbruck), Victor Alonso Troncoso (Universidade da Coruña) AHB is currently edited by: Timothy Howe (Senior Editor: [email protected]), Edward Anson, Michael Fronda, David Hollander, Sabine Müller, Joseph Roisman, John Vanderspoel and Pat Wheatley. AHB promotes scholarly discussion in Ancient History and ancillary fields (such as epigraphy, papyrology, and numismatics) by publishing articles and notes on any aspect of the ancient world from the Near East to Late Antiquity.
    [Show full text]
  • Alexander the Great Alexander the Great
    2 Alexander LEVELED BOOK • Z the Great A Reading A–Z Level Z2 Leveled Book Word Count: 2,266 Alexander Connections the Great Writing Research two kings who ruled Macedonia before Alexander. Write an essay comparing Alexander the Great to these kings. Social Studies Research more information about the customs of ancient Macedonia and Persia. Write an essay comparing the two cultures. Written by Jan C. Kraus Visit www.readinga-z.com for thousands of books and materials. www.readinga-z.com Words to Know Alexander ambitious flanked assassinated fleet botanists infantry the Great cavalry philosopher city-states regent ethics surveyors Front cover: Alexander the Great accepts the surrender of an enemy in India. Title page: A statue of Alexander the Great Page 3: Artwork shows Alexander training his horse named Bucephalus. Photo Credits: Front cover, page 19 (top right): © Granger, NYC; title page: © Mohamed Osama/123RF; page 3: © Universal Images Group/Universal Images Group/SuperStock; page 5: © Classic Image/Alamy Stock Photo; page 6: © robertharding/robertharding/SuperStock; page 7: © PanosKarapanagiotis/ iStock/Thinkstock; pages 12, 16, 19 (bottom left): © akg-images/Peter Connolly/ The Image Works; pages 13, 19 (bottom right): Alexander the Great at the Battle of Issus, Greek/Museo Archeologico Nazionale, Taranto, Puglia, Italy/© Mondadori Electa/Bridgeman Images; page 18: © 2317900 Ontario Ltd. Spirer/123RF; page 19 (top left): Rare Ancient Greek Coin, Gold Stater, Macedonia, Alexander the Great 336 BC/Hoberman/UIG/Bridgeman Images; page 19 (center left): The Taming of Bucephalus, McConnell, James Edwin/ Private Collection/© Look and Learn/Bridgeman Images Written by Jan C. Kraus www.readinga-z.com Alexander the Great World Leaders Focus Question Level Z2 Leveled Book Correlation © Learning A–Z LEVEL Z2 Written by Jan C.
    [Show full text]
  • 1569 the Yom Kippur War and the Abomination of Desolation – The
    #1569 The Yom Kippur War and the Abomination of Desolation – The series of 4’s (fours) from Alexander the Great to Antiochus IV Epiphanes, part 3b, The Battle of Ipsus in 301 B.C. ended the Fourth (and final) Diadoch War and finalized the break-up of Alexander the Great’s Empire, resulting in the specific fulfillment of prophecy of 4 (four) kingdoms coming out of the empire The process of outlining the passages in the Book of Daniel in chapters 7, 8, and 11 that prophesy that out of Alexander the Great’s Empire would come 4 (four) kingdoms will begin two Unsealings from now. One of the key verses will be Daniel 8:8, which we are using as the key verse for this Unsealing. Daniel 8:8 (KJV) Therefore THE HE GOAT [Alexander the Great’s Grecian Empire] WAXED VERY GREAT [which is why the Lord ordained Alexander to be known to history as ‘the Great’]: and when he was strong, THE GREAT HORN WAS BROKEN [Alexander the Great’s premature death in 323 B.C.]; and for it [from it] came up FOUR NOTABLE ONES [the 4 (four) kingdoms of Ptolemy, Seleucus, Cassander, and Lysimachus] TOWARD THE FOUR WINDS OF HEAVEN. Key Understanding #1: The battle of Ipsus and the four kingdoms. The Battle of Ipsus in 301 B.C. can be pinpointed as a specific event that brought forth the specific fulfillment of the passages in the Book of Daniel – in chapters 7, 8, and 11 – that prophesied that 4 (four) kingdoms would come out of Alexander the Great’s Empire.
    [Show full text]
  • The Death of Alexander the Great 1. Introduction
    The death of Alexander the Great THE DEATH OF ALEXANDER THE GREAT ABSTRACT The circumstances of Alexander’s death are reviewed. Since contemporary sources vary in their accounts of the reason for his death, they are briefly reviewed and assessed. The account of Alexander’s final illness is then discussed as recorded in the King’s Journal and the Liber de morte testamentumque Alexandri Magni. The theory that he was poisoned is rejected, as is the hypothesis that he drank himself to death. His final illness shows symptoms characteristic of malignant tertian malaria (Plasmodium fal- ciparum), possibly precipitated by recent wounds, exhaustion and heavy drinking. 1. INTRODUCTION Alexander, King of Macedonia, conqueror of the Persian empire, died in Babylon at sunset on the 10th of June, 323 BC.1 He was not yet 33 years old, had been king for 12 years and 8 months and had shown himself to be fully deserving of the title “The Great”. Educated by Aristotle, trained in warfare by his father Philip II, he invaded Asia at the age of 22 and defeated Darius III within 3 years. He never returned to Macedonia but commenced with the establishment of an Asian em- pire based on Hellenistic culture whilst incorporating the best elements of the Persians and other conquered nations. With few exceptions he was remarkably magnanimous towards his former enemies, perform- ing acts of justice far in advance of his time. As Tarn (1948:I.124- 125) puts it: This was probably the most important thing about him: he was a great dreamer. To be mystical and intensely practical, to dream greatly and to do greatly, is not given to many men; it is this combination which gives Alexander his place apart in history.
    [Show full text]
  • "The Failure of Alexander's Conquests and the Administration of Bactria
    64 Hirundo The Failure of Alexander’s Conquest and Administration of Bactria-Sogdiana By Michèle Smith Both during his lifetime and following his death, Alexander III of Macedon became a legend for his conquest of the Persian Empire until “the limits of the known oecumene.”1 Despite this fame, several of Alexander the Great’s conquests were not as successful as popular memory suggests. The ancient evidence clearly states the difficulties during Al- exander’s campaigning in the upper satrapies of Bactria-Sogdiana in 329-327 B.C., which took approximately eighteen months to suppress.2 Some scholars have dismissed this as a difficult campaign in which Alexander ultimately succeeded. However, an in-depth study of the ancient evidence not only reveals the failures in the method of conquest which Alexander used in these satrapies, but also his inability to control the satrapy once he had re-crossed the Hindu Kush to conquer India.3 Thus, the events at Bactria-Sogdiana as recorded by the available ancient evidence demonstrate that Alexander only succeeded in “extricat[ing] himself from a problem largely of his own making” in these satrapies, as well as his greater failure in administering the empire.4 A study of the vulgate tradition reveals that his inflexible assertion of control on local practices caused revolt, which was impossible to completely suppress during his lifetime due to locals’ use of guerrilla tactics and unrelenting determination. This example illustrates the fact that Alexander was famous for his conquests, not the management of his empire. Alexander’s speech after the revolt at Hyphasis clearly indicates his preference to conquer new lands rather than to return to his doriktetos chora, “which are not held securely.”5 This proved to be one of his largest failures, as his empire was already unravelling even before his premature death in 323 B.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Socrates (470–399 BC), a Classical Greek Philosopher, Developed Deduction, Logic, and Logical Reasoning
    Eratosthenes and Pliny, Greek geometry and Roman follies Khristo N. Boyadzhiev Department of Mathematics and Statistics Ohio Northern University Ada, OH 45810 Abstract. In this note we point out that supportive attitudes can bring to a blossoming science, while neglect and different values can quickly remove science from everyday life and provide a very primitive view of the world. We compare one important Greek achievement, the computation of the Earth meridian by Eratosthenes, to its later interpretation by the Roman historian of science Pliny. 2010 Mathematics Subject Classification, 01A20 Keywords. Eratosthenes, the meridian of the Earth, Greek mathematics, Roman empire, Pliny the Elder. 1. Timeline Something extraordinary happened in ancient Greece during the period 600-100 BC. During these five centuries the Greeks created the foundations of present-day science and mathematics. They achieved unprecedented results. The quality of these results is compatible only to those obtained seventeen centuries later. After the rise of the Roman Empire, however, the development of science and mathematics slowed down and came to an end. For several centuries after that there were practically no scientific activities in Europe. Here is a short timeline. Pythagoras of Samos (575-496 BC). Created the Pythagorean mathematical school. Obtained many theorems in Geometry and Number Theory. Socrates (470–399 BC), a classical Greek philosopher, developed deduction, logic, and logical reasoning. His student Plato strongly influenced Aristotle, whom he taught on his part. Plato (424-348 BC); Aristotle (384-322 BC) 1 Aristotle worked with Alexander the Great and taught him science, mathematics and history. Alexander the Great (356-323 BC) introduces Greek science and culture to his vast empire.
    [Show full text]
  • Bridging the Hellespont: the Successor Lysimachus - a Study
    BRIDGING THE HELLESPONT: THE SUCCESSOR LYSIMACHUS - A STUDY IN EARLY HELLENISTIC KINGSHIP Helen Sarah Lund PhD University College, London ProQuest Number: 10610063 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest 10610063 Published by ProQuest LLC(2017). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States C ode Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106- 1346 ABSTRACT Literary evidence on Lysimachus reveals a series of images which may say more about contemporary or later views on kingship than about the actual man, given the intrusion of bias, conventional motifs and propaganda. Thrace was Lysimachus* legacy from Alexander's empire; though problems posed by its formidable tribes and limited resources excluded him from the Successors' wars for nearly ten years, its position, linking Europe and Asia, afforded him some influence, Lysimachus failed to conquer "all of Thrace", but his settlements there achieved enough stability to allow him thoughts of rule across the Hellespont, in Asia Minor, More ambitious and less cautious than is often thought, Lysimachus' acquisition of empire in Asia Minor, Macedon and Greece from c.315 BC to 284 BC reflects considerable military and diplomatic skills, deployed primarily when self-interest demanded rather than reflecting obligations as a permanent member of an "anti-Antigonid team".
    [Show full text]
  • Alexander the Great's Cabinet
    Letter from Academic Assistant I would like to start by welcoming you all to this annual session of HaydarpaşaMUN! I also would like to state that I think you are the twelve luckiest delegates of the conference since you are now allocated in our traditional World-Changing Commander’s Cabinet themed committee. In this year’s cabinet you will represent the bravest and the most sharp witted of the soldiers since you will be serving Alexander III of the Macedons as known as Alexander the Great and shall have the most adventurous battles devoted to his army. On the other hand you will further learn upon the history’s biggest mastermind and be granted the chance to rewrite it. I can guarantee you that you will have the most of fun and also the biggest academic pleasure. Therefore I would like to thank every person behind this conference by starting with our passionate and sympathetic Secretary General Zeynep Naz Coşkun and our esteemed and hardworking Crisis Team since they are the ones who will be providing you this highly prestigious committee before concluding my thanks I would also like to thank my academic trainee Zeynep Erşen for her hardworks and fellow companionship In order to conclude I can recommend you nothing but further research the topic since ancient warfare ,political structure and relations can be really hard to understand. I personally recommend the website called ancient history encyclopedia also the videos that briefly explains warfare of the era since visual explanations are more easy to understand. In case you have any questions please don’t hesitate to contact me and my trainee via m​ [email protected] ​and z​[email protected] ​Hope to see you soon! Yağmur Zühal Tokur - Academic Assistant Zeynep Erşen - Academic Trainee Introduction Alexander the Great whom you will become companies of for these four days was not just the king of Macedonia or the leader that started Hellenistic Era.
    [Show full text]