DOCSLIB.ORG

Surveymonkey Analyze

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Surveymonkey Analyze CHI2004 Conference Survey Q1 Was CHI2004 worth your time and money? Answered: 920 Skipped: 3 Yes No 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Answer Choices Responses Yes 92.17% 848 No 7.83% 72 Total 920 1 / 25 CHI2004 Conference Survey Opening Plenary CHI Fringe Demonstrations Design Expo Development Consortium Doctoral Consortium Exhibits HCI Overviews Informal SIGs Other Special Sessions Panel Sessions Paper Sessions Posters Short Talks SIGs Student Competition Tutorials Workshops Closing Plenary 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 2 / 25 CHI2004 Conference Survey Poor Fair Neutral Good Excellent Didn't attend Total Weighted Average Opening Plenary 2.50% 6.74% 10.33% 39.89% 19.89% 20.65% 23 62 95 367 183 190 920 3.86 CHI Fringe 0.76% 2.07% 6.09% 14.78% 9.02% 67.28% 7 19 56 136 83 619 920 3.89 Demonstrations 0.43% 4.02% 12.72% 32.93% 7.50% 42.39% 4 37 117 303 69 390 920 3.75 Design Expo 0.76% 2.50% 8.37% 19.78% 7.83% 60.76% 7 23 77 182 72 559 920 3.80 Development Consortium 0.11% 0.22% 2.61% 3.48% 0.65% 92.93% 1 2 24 32 6 855 920 3.62 Doctoral Consortium 0.11% 0.11% 2.72% 1.63% 2.28% 93.15% 1 1 25 15 21 857 920 3.86 Exhibits 1.52% 6.20% 22.17% 39.78% 5.33% 25.00% 14 57 204 366 49 230 920 3.55 HCI Overviews 0.65% 3.26% 8.37% 20.22% 4.46% 63.04% 6 30 77 186 41 580 920 3.66 Informal SIGs 0.33% 2.07% 5.33% 10.76% 3.91% 77.61% 3 19 49 99 36 714 920 3.71 Other Special Sessions 0.54% 1.20% 5.00% 14.78% 6.52% 71.96% 5 11 46 136 60 662 920 3.91 Panel Sessions 3.04% 5.22% 12.83% 26.85% 8.70% 43.37% 28 48 118 247 80 399 920 3.58 Paper Sessions 1.63% 4.78% 12.72% 52.39% 18.04% 10.43% 15 44 117 482 166 96 920 3.90 Posters 1.63% 5.54% 16.63% 44.67% 10.87% 20.65% 15 51 153 411 100 190 920 3.73 Short Talks 0.87% 3.26% 10.98% 45.22% 27.28% 12.39% 8 30 101 416 251 114 920 4.08 SIGs 0.11% 2.72% 7.39% 16.96% 10.33% 62.50% 1 25 68 156 95 575 920 3.92 Student Competition 0.87% 1.09% 5.54% 12.61% 14.57% 65.33% 8 10 51 116 134 601 920 4.12 Tutorials 1.52% 2.61% 4.13% 12.83% 7.83% 71.09% 14 24 38 118 72 654 920 3.79 Workshops 0.54% 1.09% 2.93% 7.83% 7.28% 80.33% 5 10 27 72 67 739 920 4.03 Closing Plenary 1.74% 3.15% 8.04% 22.72% 27.17% 37.17% 16 29 74 209 250 342 920 4.12 3 / 25 CHI2004 Conference Survey Q3 Please rate the conference overall: Answered: 920 Skipped: 3 Overall Rating Carried out the conferen... Kept up with the latest... Content was interesting Content was personally... Content was business... Content met my overall needs 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Poor Fair Neutral Good Excellent Don't care Total Weighted Average Overall Rating 1.09% 4.67% 10.65% 63.59% 18.70% 1.30% 10 43 98 585 172 12 920 3.95 Carried out the conference theme “Connect” 4.67% 8.26% 30.76% 29.35% 10.65% 16.30% 43 76 283 270 98 150 920 3.39 Kept up with the latest trends 2.39% 7.07% 20.98% 48.15% 16.52% 4.89% 22 65 193 443 152 45 920 3.73 Content was interesting 1.20% 5.43% 12.07% 61.30% 18.80% 1.20% 11 50 111 564 173 11 920 3.92 Content was personally valuable 2.50% 5.98% 16.09% 51.85% 22.28% 1.30% 23 55 148 477 205 12 920 3.87 Content was business valuable 3.15% 8.80% 26.96% 31.63% 10.33% 19.13% 29 81 248 291 95 176 920 3.46 Content met my overall needs 2.61% 8.26% 20.11% 50.54% 16.85% 1.63% 24 76 185 465 155 15 920 3.72 4 / 25 CHI2004 Conference Survey Q4 What is the value you received from attending CHI2004? (please check all that apply) Answered: 920 Skipped: 3 Present my work Get feedback on my work Learn new material Seek job opportunities Meet new friends and... Renew relationship... Expand my business... Visit an interesting... Get an overview of ... Get new ideas and inspiration Other (please specify) 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Answer Choices Responses Present my work 43.48% 400 Get feedback on my work 42.61% 392 Learn new material 74.67% 687 Seek job opportunities 14.57% 134 Meet new friends and colleagues 73.91% 680 Renew relationships with others 62.72% 577 Expand my business opportunities 16.96% 156 Visit an interesting location 56.41% 519 Get an overview of the field 45.65% 420 Get new ideas and inspiration 80.11% 737 5 / 25 CHI2004 Conference Survey Other (please specify) 5.43% 50 Total Respondents: 920 6 / 25 CHI2004 Conference Survey Q5 Before the conference: how did the following meet your needs? Answered: 920 Skipped: 3 Conference web site Submission process Registration process 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Poor Fair Neutral Good Excellent N/A Total Weighted Average Conference web site 7.17% 14.13% 20.43% 41.74% 15.22% 1.30% 66 130 188 384 140 12 920 3.44 Submission process 3.04% 6.30% 13.15% 32.83% 11.52% 33.15% 28 58 121 302 106 305 920 3.65 Registration process 4.13% 8.59% 15.76% 50.11% 17.50% 3.91% 38 79 145 461 161 36 920 3.71 7 / 25 CHI2004 Conference Survey Q9 Based on your experiences at CHI2004 would you recommend the conference to others? Answered: 883 Skipped: 40 Yes No 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Answer Choices Responses Yes 91.73% 810 No 8.27% 73 Total 883 8 / 25 CHI2004 Conference Survey Q10 Do you plan to attend CHI 2005 in Portland, Oregon, US? Answered: 883 Skipped: 40 Yes No 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Answer Choices Responses Yes 65.12% 575 No 34.88% 308 Total 883 9 / 25 CHI2004 Conference Survey Q11 In which region or city would you be most likely to attend the CHI conference after 2006? Answered: 1,766 Skipped: -843 US Bay area/San... Vancouver B.C. US Southern California... US East cost US Central Northern Europe Southern Europe Asia-Pacific No preference 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Answer Choices Responses US Bay area/San Francisco 10.99% 194 Vancouver B.C. 9.74% 172 US Southern California coast 2.38% 42 US East cost 6.34% 112 US Central 0.91% 16 Northern Europe 26.39% 466 Southern Europe 19.25% 340 Asia-Pacific 8.15% 144 No preference 15.86% 280 Total 1,766 10 / 25 CHI2004 Conference Survey Q12 Which of the following would you prefer? Answered: 1,766 Skipped: -843 CD/DVD at the conference... CD/DVD at the conference... CD/DVD at the conference... No preference 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Answer Choices Responses CD/DVD at the conference included in registration fee 28.54% 504 CD/DVD at the conference included in registration fee with printed proceedings for additional fee (approximately $50) 43.49% 768 CD/DVD at the conference included in registration fee and printed proceedings available after the conference for additional fee (approximately $50) 14.84% 262 No preference 13.14% 232 Total 1,766 11 / 25 CHI2004 Conference Survey Q13 How do you use the proceedings? Check all that apply. Answered: 1,766 Skipped: -843 Read before attending... Decide which sessions to... Read and make notes during... Read after the conference Keep in personal... Use search to find topics ... Share with colleagues o... Don't use Other (please specify) 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Answer Choices Responses Read before attending sessions 45.19% 798 Decide which sessions to attend 61.83% 1,092 Read and make notes during sessions 39.98% 706 Read after the conference 79.28% 1,400 Keep in personal library 77.69% 1,372 Use search to find topics you are interested in 45.53% 804 Share with colleagues or students 63.08% 1,114 Don't use 1.93% 34 Other (please specify) 6.80% 120 Total Respondents: 1,766 12 / 25 CHI2004 Conference Survey Q14 What role did you play at CHI2004? (Please check all that apply.) Answered: 1,742 Skipped: -819 Attendee Presenter/Organ izer Student Volunteer Exhibitor/Vendo r Sponsor Committee Member –... Committee Member – CHI... Other (please specify) 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Answer Choices Responses Attendee 50.86% 886 Presenter/Organizer 32.03% 558 Student Volunteer 4.25% 74 Exhibitor/Vendor 1.26% 22 Sponsor 0.92% 16 Committee Member – CHI2004 2.53% 44 Committee Member – CHI 2005 0.23% 4 Other (please specify) 7.92% 138 Total 1,742 13 / 25 CHI2004 Conference Survey Q15 Which of the following best describes your profession? (If you are a student enter the professional discipline you are studying.) Answered: 1,742 Skipped: -819 Architect Anthropologist Designer Graphics/Ill..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Changing Shape of the Computing World
    Outside the Box — The Changing Shape of the Computing World Steve Cunningham Computer Science California State University Stanislaus Turlock, CA 95382 [email protected] http://www.cs.csustan.edu/~rsc Something happened to computing while many of us were busy practicing or teaching our craft, and computing is not quite the same thing we learned. We can ignore this change and others will take our place and teach about it, but they will not have the context and the skill to understand the technology behind it and to carry it forward to the success it should have. And if others carry that torch, computer science will be stunted because we didn't recognize and respond to the opportunity. What happened? Simply this—that Xerox and Apple and, yes, Microsoft opened up the box labeled “CAUTION: Computer Inside” and let the user into the computing picture. Users responded hesitantly but increasingly eagerly and now expect the computer to work for them instead of their working for the computer. Every application now in wide use, and any system that supports a general market, has evolved to meet that expectation. Any computing education that does not pay attention to the user’s role in computing is missing the most vibrant and exciting part of computing today. As it says at the top of this page, you are reading an editorial, not an academic paper. As an editorial, this note represents my personal passion and commitment to the user communication part of computing that the “official” computing establishment has long discounted, and I appreciate John Impagliazzo’s offer of this forum to make my case that computer science is missing the boat in not understanding the need to reshape computer science education to fill this void.
    [Show full text]
  • SIGCHI Conferences Report for Members May 2018
    SIGCHI Conferences Report " ! " ! " May 22, 2018 SIGCHI (Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction) is led by the SIGCHI Executive committee and one of the appointed roles on this committee is the ACM SIGCHI Vice President for Conferences. This person is responsible for overseeing all aspects of SIGCHI-sponsored conferences and SIGCHI currently sponsors 24 conferences. www.si In addition to the annual CHI conference, the Specialised Conferences program of ACM SIGCHI has gradually evolved and has now become a significant part of the conference program that is offered to the HCI community at large. Across our conferences we have over 9,000 delegates attend our 24 conferences, with around 3000 of these attending CHI. This program includes all conferences involving ACM SIGCHI other than the annual CHI conferences. Throughout this report there are references to Specialised Conferences (e.g. Group to VRST) and CHI. Each conference has a steering committee and the chair of each steering committee serves on the ACM SIGCHI Council of Steering Committee Chairs. In addition we have an Adjunct Chair for CHI on the SIGCHI EC along with a SIGCHI Conference Board which works with the ACM SIGCHI VP for Conferences. The CHI Steering Committee oversees the activities of all CHI conference committee chairs from CHI 2018 onwards. It ensures that the objectives of the conference as established by the Steering Committee and EC are met. The CHI Steering Committee was created by SIGCHI Executive Committee in 2016. From CHI 2018 onwards, this committee serves as a focal point for communications between the conference committee, CHI attendees, CHI committees, CHI vendors, CHI liaison, SIGCHI and the SIGCHI Services Staff.
    [Show full text]
  • Dronepaint: Swarm Light Painting with DNN-Based Gesture Recognition
    DronePaint: Swarm Light Painting with DNN-based Gesture Recognition Valerii Serpiva Ekaterina Karmanova Aleksey Fedoseev Skolkovo Institute of Science and Skolkovo Institute of Science and Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology Technology Technology Moscow, Russia Moscow, Russia Moscow, Russia [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Stepan Perminov Dzmitry Tsetserukou Skolkovo Institute of Science and Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology Technology Moscow, Russia Moscow, Russia [email protected] [email protected] Figure 1: a) View of user screen. Drawing trajectory by hand and gesture recognition. b) Long exposure light painting of “Siggraph" logo by drone. c) Single swarm agent with the LED circle. ABSTRACT trajectory patterns. The proposed system can be potentially applied We propose a novel human-swarm interaction system, allowing the in complex environment exploration, spray painting using drones, user to directly control a swarm of drones in a complex environment and interactive drone shows, allowing users to create their own art through trajectory drawing with a hand gesture interface based on objects by drone swarms. the DNN-based gesture recognition. The developed CV-based system allows the user to control the CCS CONCEPTS swarm behavior without additional devices through human ges- • Human-centered computing ! Human-computer interac- tures and motions in real-time, providing convenient tools to change tion (HCI). the swarm’s shape and formation.
    [Show full text]
  • Elizabeth Baron Candidate for Director a As an ACM SIGGRAPH
    Elizabeth Baron Candidate for Director A As an ACM SIGGRAPH Pioneer, implementing computer graphics and interactive techniques, I relied on SIGGRAPH for inspiration on how to apply CG & IT in novel ways. I was taught how to bring art, engineering and science to life through expressive, realistic and accurate experiences. Believing it is important to give back to an organization that has given so much, I am honored to be considered to serve as a Director-at-Large. Over the past two years I have avidly participated in the ACM SIGGRAPH Executive Committee Strategy Team sessions. The team has made impressive, significant changes to increase our relevancy. I believe that to grow both the conference and the organization, we must bridge the gap between research and industry practitioners. ACM SIGGRAPH can influence the practical and innovative application of CG & IT methods, products, services and systems for industry. We can be involved in industry. As SFX become physics-based, the importance and accuracy of many types of simulations are as appropriate and useful for media and entertainment as well as for industry. We can learn from each other. ACM SIGGRAPH has inspired the CG & IT industry and practitioners around the world. I want to be a part of growing the outstanding legacy SIGGRAPH has created to enable everyone to tell their stories. BIOGRAPHY Elizabeth Baron is Vice President of Immersive Solutions for Silverdraft Supercomputing. She has been the driving force in the development and deployment of global, collaborative immersive paradigms for industrial design and engineering. Formerly, Elizabeth was a Technical Specialist in Immersive Realities at Ford Motor Company.
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Table of Contents Links
    AI MATTERS, VOLUME 5, ISSUE 2 5(2) 2019 AI Matters Annotated Table of Contents Full article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/3340470.3340476 Winning essay from the 2018 ACM SIGAI Student Welcome to AI Matters 5(2) Essay Contest Amy McGovern, co-editor & Iolanda Leite, co-editor Context-conscious fairness in using Full article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/3340470.3340471 machine learning to make decisions Welcome and summary Michelle Seng Ah Lee Full article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/3340470.3340477 AI Profiles: An Interview with Leslie Kaelbling Winning essay from the 2018 ACM SIGAI Student Essay Contest Marion Neumann Full article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/3340470.3340472 The Scales of (Algorithmic) Justice: Interview with Leslie Kaelbling Tradeoffs and Remedies Matthew Sun & Marissa Gerchick Events Full article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/3340470.3340478 Michael Rovatsos Winning essay from the 2018 ACM SIGAI Student Full article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/3340470.3340473 Essay Contest Upcoming AI events What Metrics Should We Use To Mea- AI Education Matters: Data Science sure Commercial AI? and Machine Learning with Magic: Cameron Hughes & Tracey Hughes The Gathering Full article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/3340470.3340479 Todd W. Neller Metrics for commercial AI Full article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/3340470.3340474 Data Science and Machine Learning with Magic: The Gathering Crosswords Adi Botea AI Policy Matters Full article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/3340470.3340480 Larry Medsker AI generated Crosswords Full article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/3340470.3340475
    [Show full text]
  • SIGCHI Executive Committee Meeting Notes 2014/10
    SIGCHI EC agenda ­ Honolulu, Hawaii, USA October 9­11, 2014 October 9 Gerrit van der Veer, Allison Druin, Philippe Palanque, Rob Jacob, Fred Sampson, Gary Olson, Scooter Morris, Patrick Kelley, Zhengjie Liu, Ashley Cozzi, John Thomas, Jonathan Lazar, Dan Olsen Apologies: Elizabeth Churchill, Jenny Preece, John Karat, Jofish Kaye, Kia Hook, Tuomo Kujala Various Issues: ● Sig Governing Board retiree task force (and JohnT’s suggestion) ○ Draft from Jonathan Grudin, Ron Baecker, John Thomas: Seniors for CHI, CHI for Seniors Ron Baecker, Jonathan Grudin, John Thomas Gerrit to send email to EC­DONE Gerrit needs some feedback to bring to SIG Governing Board ● One of the SIGs have been developing “Playing cards of notable women in computing” This will be a kickstarter project, launching very soon (at Grace Hopper?) Details: http://www.cs.duke.edu/csed/wikipedia/cards.html Big: http://www.cs.duke.edu/csed/wikipedia/notableWomenWebPoster.jpg ● Publishing the minutes from the *May* Toronto meeting ○ Allison to work with Fred on re­doing Students and Leaders: ● Scholarships­ ○ Gary Marsden Honoring: ■ Work with/collaborate with University and check with Family ■ Gary Olson to lead this effort & will involve others (Matt Jones, Susan Dray) ○ NEED Conference Scholarships for all SIGCHI sponsored Conferences ■ Scooter to take it to the CMC ● Mentoring ○ John T to chair: Create a light­weight policy for mentoring proposal­ Allison & Scooter to help­DONE ● Awards ○ Actually looking for nominations (CHI Academy + others) – Nov 15th ○ Patrick to share this info with the rest of the SIGCHI community through social media ○ Rob & Dan to find out awards status from Loren ■ Two Turing awards continuing forward ■ Several ACM Fellows continuing forward ■ This is starting to operate organically within the community.
    [Show full text]
  • Abstr Acts Exemplified by These Papers
    by Zeltzer, as his simulated human skeleton can (or will) central to the motion understanding problem than might navigate terrain, respond to obstacles, and yet walk with a cer- previously have been imagined. It is certainly important to tain "style" dictated by embedded (but communicating) understand the workings of the human visual system and the motion control programs. Simmons and Davis demonstrate structure of effective computer vision systems for processing the potential of high level representations by showing that moving objects, but the representations that are chosen to "why" questions are answerable with a high-level representa- elucidate some mechanism cannot be viewed in isolation. tion: demonstrating a representation's knowledge structure Rather, their semantics should be implementable and trans- not only of how to move (or change), but why. The Fortin, formable into a more readily visualized form amenable to Lamy, and Thalmann paper falls into an intermediate level either visual inspection or analytical verification. Design and where temporal relationships can be handled with graphical implementation of motion semantics is an exciting and relationships and motions themselves may be of any sort sup- challenging research field stimulating our representation struc- ported by the remainder of the animation system. turing skills while serving scientific and artistic applications. Since a principal function of a motion representation is verification that that representation is indeed adequate for a task, we must ask: 3) How is the motion information within the representa- tion visualized? The obvious answer is, of course, with computer-gener- ated graphics. The less obvious methods are with "natural language" descriptions, physical (robot) control, and question-answering.
    [Show full text]
  • SIGGRAPH 2007 Computer Animation Festival Final Report 3/26/2008
    SIGGRAPH 2007 Computer Animation Festival Final Report 3/26/2008 SIGGRAPH 2007 Computer Animation Festival Final Report Paul Debevec USC Institute for Creative Technologies SIGGRAPH 2007 Computer Animation Festival Chair [email protected] Last Update: March 26, 2008 This document presents the final report for the SIGGRAPH 2007 Computer Animation Festival. It provides relevant information about decisions made and work executed for the various aspects of putting on the show, and suggestions for improvements for future years. If you have any questions about this report – especially if you are in the process of organizing a SIGGRAPH Computer Animation Festival or similar event yourself – please feel free to contact me at [email protected]. Paul Debevec, USC ICT Page 1 SIGGRAPH 2007 Computer Animation Festival Final Report 3/26/2008 Contents Chairing a successful SIGGRAPH Computer Animation Festival was enormously rewarding but a huge amount of work. It required recruiting a skilled and dedicated CAF committee and anticipating, planning, and executing hundreds of tasks efficiently and effectively. This document describes the most significant tasks with an eye toward helping future CAF chairs learn from both the successes and lessons learned from putting on the SIGGRAPH 2007 Computer Animation Festival. The organization is as follows: Writing the Call for Participation ....................................................................................... 4 Setting the submission deadline.....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Dinesh Manocha Distinguished Professor Computer Science University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
    Dinesh Manocha Distinguished Professor Computer Science University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Awards and honors and year received (list--no more than *five* items): • 2011: Distinguished Alumni Award, Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi • 2011: Fellow of Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) • 2011: Fellow of American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) • 2009: Fellow of Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) • 1997: Office of Naval Research Young Investigator Award Have you previously been involved in any CRA activities? If so, describe. Manocha has been actively involved with organization and participation in CCC workshops that were related to robotics, spatial computing and human-computer interaction. List any other relevant experience and year(s) it occurred (list--no more than *five* items). • SIGGRAPH Executive Committee, Director-At-Large, 2011 – 2014 • General Chair/Co-Chair of 8 conferences and workshops; (1995- onwards) • Member of Editorial board and Guest editor of 20 journals in computer graphics, robotics, geometric computing, and parallel computing. (1995 onwards) • 34 Keynote and Distinguished Lectures between 2011-2015 • Program Chair/Co-Chair of 5 conferences and workshops; 100+ program committees in computer graphics, virtual reality, robotics, gaming, acoustics, and geometric computing Research interests: (list only) • Computer graphics • Virtual reality • Robotics • Geometric computing • Parallel computing Personal Statement Given the dynamic nature of our field, CRA is playing an ever-increasing role in terms of research and education. Over the last 25 years, my research has spanned a variety of different fields, including geometric/symbolic computing, computer graphics, robotics, virtual-reality and parallel computing. I have worked closely with researchers/developers in engineering, medical, and social sciences and also interacted with leading industrial organizations, federal laboratories, and startups.
    [Show full text]
  • View the Revised S2018 Advance Program
    PLAN YOUR EXPERIENCE ADVANCE PROGRAM The 45th International Conference & Exhibition on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques TABLE OF CONTENTS SCHEDULE AT A GLANCE ................................................... 3 CURATED CONTENT REASONS TO ATTEND ......................................................... 6 SIGGRAPH 2018 offers several events and sessions that are individually chosen by program chairs to CONFERENCE OVERVIEW ...................................................7 address specific topics in computer graphics and interactive techniques. CONFERENCE SCHEDULE ................................................ 10 Curated content is not selected through the regular APPY HOUR ..........................................................................19 channels of a comprehensive jury. ART GALLERY ......................................................................20 ART PAPERS........................................................................23 INTEREST AREAS SIGGRAPH brings together a wide variety of BUSINESS SYMPOSIUM ...................................................25 professionals who approach computer graphics and COMPUTER ANIMATION FESTIVAL: interactive techniques from different perspectives. ELECTONIC THEATER ........................................................26 Our programs and events align with five broad interest areas (listed below). Use these interest areas to help COMPUTER ANIMATION FESTIVAL: VR THEATER ........ 27 guide you through the content at SIGGRAPH 2018. COURSES .............................................................................28
    [Show full text]
  • 2006 Annual Report
    ACM SIGDOC FY’06 Annual Report Submitted by Brad Mehlenbacher, SIGDOC Chair _SIGDOC Purpose The Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) Special Interest Group (SIG) on the Design of Communication (DOC) — ACM SIGDOC — emphasizes the design of communication for computer-mediated information products and systems. SIGDOC fosters the study and publication of processes, methods, and technologies for communicating and designing communication artifacts such as printed and online information, documentation designs and applications, multimedia and Web-based environments. _SIGDOC Mission Statement Until 2003, SIGDOC focused on documentation for hardware and software. With the shift in focus from documentation to the “design of communication,” SIGDOC better positioned itself to emphasize the potentials, the practices, and the problems of multiple kinds of communication technologies, such as Web applications, user interfaces, and online and print documentation. SIGDOC focuses on the design of communication as it is taught, practiced, researched, and theorized in various fields, including technical communication, software engineering, information architecture, and usability. The mission of SIGDOC includes • Promoting the professional development of its members • Encouraging interdisciplinary problem solving related to online and print documentation and communication technologies • Providing avenues for publication and the exchange of professional information • Supporting research that focuses on the needs and goals of humans in technological contexts,
    [Show full text]
  • Conference Program
    THE PREMIER CONFERENCE FOR ELECTRONIC DESIGN TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE PROGRAM November 2-6, 2014 Hilton San Jose, San Jose, California Sponsored by: In cooperation with: special interest group on design automation www.ICCAD.com 2014 The Premier Conference Devoted to Technical Innovations in Electronic Design Automation Yao-Wen Chang General Chair National Taiwan Univ., Dept. of Electrical Engineering Welcome to the 33rd ICCAD! Welcome to San Jose, California for the 33rd ICCAD, held Since 2012, ICCAD has become a crucial platform for holding annual from November 2nd to 6th, 2014. Like its 32 predecessors, highly competitive EDA contests, co-hosted by IEEE CEDA and Taiwan ICCAD 2014 provides a premier forum to explore emerging Ministry of Education, on modern topics to foster research advancements. challenges, present cutting-edge R&D solutions, record This year three contest problems on logic synthesis, timing-driven theoretical and empirical advances, and identify future placement, and DFM flow attracted 93 participating teams worldwide, roadmaps for design automation. Furthermore, ICCAD 2014 is co-located with achieving a greater success for this tradition. The contest results are the Phil Kaufman Award ceremony, IEEE CEDA CAD Contests, ACM CADathlon announced in the Tuesday contest session, along with the release of Contest and Student Research Competition, the Sunday full-day workshop on contest benchmarks. TCAD simulation, and five Thursday full-day workshops on design automation for analog and mixed-signal circuits, EDA research in the dark silicon era, It is our greatest honor to invite three distinguished keynote speakers: The variability modeling and characterization, process design kit automation, and Monday keynote is by Dr.
    [Show full text]