DOCSLIB.ORG

The Purpose of This Meeting with the TAC Was to Provide a Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Purpose of This Meeting with the TAC Was to Provide a Project Meeting Summary Phoenix Goodyear Airport Master Plan Update Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) Meeting No. 3 September 6, 2017 – 1:30 pm to 3:00 pm Phoenix Goodyear Airport Terminal Building Conference Room Meeting Objective: The purpose of this meeting with the TAC was to provide a project status update, recap the approved aviation demand forecast, review facilities requirements for the Airport, discuss proposed secondary runway locations, related alternatives, and land use configurations. Attendance: Committee Attendees Name Organization Ryan Reeves LUX Air Chris Snodgrass Lufthansa Aviation Training USA Inc. Tim Berger Lux Air Jim Stark GYR Tenants Association Terry Brandt FAAS Team Rep/Tenant Andreas Paulick German Air Force Eric Webster Goodyear Police Department Barry Kidd AerSale Scott Zachary Goodyear Tire & Rubber – Haley & Aldrich Aviation Department Attendees Name Organization Bobbie Reid Aviation Department – Acting Assistant Aviation Director Randy Payne Aviation Department – Planning and Environmental Division Brad Hagen Aviation Department – Phoenix Goodyear Airport Sarah Carter Aviation Department – Planning and Environmental Division Christy Gomez Aviation Department – Aviation Department Curtis Richardson Aviation Department – Facility & Services Consultant Staff Attendees Name Organization Pam Keidel-Adams Kimley Horn & Associates, Inc. Colin Wheeler Kimley Horn & Associates, Inc. Thomas Gibson Kimley Horn & Associates, Inc. Mary Ortega-Itsell Genesis Consulting Group, LLC Rick Crosman Genesis Consulting Group, LLC *Called into meeting via conference call Airport Master Plan – Phoenix Goodyear Airport 1 1. Welcome – Randy Payne welcomed the TAC. 2. Project Team Update – Randy Payne presented changes to the Consultant Project Management Team. Armstrong Consultants remains the prime. Pam Keidel-Adams, Kimley Horn & Associates, will take over the responsibilities of Project Management for the remainder of the MPU. Pam Keidel-Adams (PKA) introduced the Kimley Horn team: Colin Wheeler (CW) and Thomas Gibson (TG). 3. Presentation: a. Overview: Pam Keidel-Adams provided the TAC with a recap of the aviation demand forecast and facilities requirements. After going over the project work done to date, Colin Wheeler provided a presentation on proposed parallel runway alternatives. After discussion and comment on the proposed parallel runway and other airfield alternatives, the focus shifted to appropriate future land uses for the remaining developable land within the Airport envelope. An interactive activity provided the TAC with an opportunity to use their extensive knowledge to propose various configurations for future land use categories. At the end of the meeting, Randy reminded the TAC of the next meeting, where the recommended airside alternatives and the land use interactive exercise will be presented in their final draft form. b. Aviation Demand Forecast Overview and Recap: PKA announced that the Aviation Demand Forecast for 2016 GYR Master Plan Update was approved by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). As part of the approval, the FAA concurred that the Boeing 767 is the design aircraft for the Airport. Summary tables of Based Aircraft Forecast and Operations Forecast was provided. Discussions included a review of the based aircraft fleet mix projections, with a comment that the 9.63% based aircraft forecast growth for jets had already been exceeded. The current number is twelve. In addition, it was noted that although the air carrier operations have the highest forecasted growth rate, the local GA operations (which reflect the continued growth of the flight schools) are close behind and will require associated facilities development. It was also noted that although, CTC Aviation will vacate their current Goodyear Airport lease at the end of 2017, Lufthansa will either seek another flight school or expand their current operation. c. Facility Requirements Overview and Recap: Facility requirements represents the infrastructure development needed for the airside, landside, and other support facilities based on the approved aviation forecasts. Summary tables of Aircraft Parking Apron Requirements and Hangar/Structure Requirements were provided. Discussions included: • Current approved forecast for aircraft parking apron needs. The requirements for available parking apron will increased by 80% over the 20-year planning horizon • The MRO, FBO, and flight schools all envision expansion in the near term. • Hangar size requirements will change over the design period, with less need for T-hangar and shade structures, and an increased need for conventional hangers. Airport Master Plan – Phoenix Goodyear Airport 2 • A recap of the airfield demand/capacity ratio included reviewing the annual service volume (ASV) for GYR. The ASV for GYR was determined using a standard FAA formula along with various assumptions made on behalf of the airport. For GYR, the ASV is estimated to be 275,590 annual aircraft operations. It was noted that typically when operations at an airport reach 60 percent of the ASV, the FAA recommends planning for additional capacity and implementing additional capacity enhancements at 80 percent. d. Development Alternatives Overview and Results: Colin Wheeler presented an overview of the runway, and airfield development alternatives process, and explained that all alternatives presented were subject to an Alternatives Evaluation Criteria (Criteria), to assure consistency. This criterion addressed critical questions about each Alternatives ability to: • satisfy forecasted demand, • minimize environmental impacts, • facilitate safety in operations, • enhance revenue and/or future development opportunities, • improve airspace efficiency, • minimize impacts to the community, and existing facilities, • and, in general represent the highest and best use of the associated airport property. The Alternatives discussion was divided into two parts with the initial discussion covering potential configurations of a new parallel runway, and latter discussions addressing the airfield alternatives of infrastructure and apron area development. It was emphasized that all proposed alternatives would be contained “on airport”. There will be no expanded recommended “off airport” footprint. Parallel Runway Development Alternatives The parallel runway alternatives centered on the Airport’s ability to accommodate a 5,000’ by 75’ new parallel runway capable of accommodating the existing and future Small to midsize aircraft fleet mix. Alternatives were divided into three categories that included a “No-Build” alternative, an “East Side” development alternative, and a “West Side” development alternative. The “No-Build” alternative was dismissed because taking no action does not satisfy the Airport’s projected future demand requirements. The “East Side” alternative had actually depicted as a 4,300’ parallel runway on a previous ALP. However, part of the RPZ would have been ‘off airport” and would have required substantial relocation of existing facilities if implemented today, it was, therefore, dismissed. The “West Side” alternative depicted the new parallel runway in two different locations identified as the North and South Alternatives, both of which are located west of the existing Runway 3/21. Runway Alternative 1 – North had a number of benefits including being close to the Airport’s flight schools, having high ATCT visibility for both runway ends, and preserving opportunities for future development on the SW corner of the Airport. Airport Master Plan – Phoenix Goodyear Airport 3 Notable impacts or disadvantages of the Alternative-1 North include, elimination of development potential on NW portion of the Airport closest to the existing flight schools, reduction in the usable area of the NW aircraft storage area, and required possible relocation of a major existing drainage canal. Additionally, this configuration moves the runway closer to residential areas, cuts off landside access to the SW portion of the airfield, and potentially causes environmental impacts to Bullard Wash. Runway Alternative 2 – South is depicted in the SW portion of the Airport, also west of existing Runway 3/21. This configuration preserves the opportunity for development of the NW portion of the airfield with access at Yuma Road, moves the runway further away from residential sites, and avoids conflicts with the existing drainage canal. Notable impacts or disadvantages of Alternative – 2 South include, increased taxiing distance for flight school aircraft and other tenants because of its more southerly location, and reduction of usable area at the existing NW aircraft storage area. In both the North and South Alternative scenarios, the runway RPZ remains within the airport boundary. Comparisons of the two Runway Alternatives utilizing the Alternatives Evaluation Criteria previously mentioned, favor the selection of Runway Alternative - 2 South, as the overall highest and best use of available airport land, with fewer negative impacts. Discussions: • There was general discussion between the TAC, about the locations of taxiways for the new proposed parallel runway. Discussions included the location of midfield taxiways for the proposed parallel runway and whether “high speed” taxiway exits would be appropriate. The committee is interested in seeing more taxiway exits from the parallel runway than were depicted in the graphic. • During discussions on Alternative – 1 North, a safety issues was raised: The proximity of the smelter plant constitutes
Load more

Recommended publications
  • For Sale Prominade
    AIRPORT GATEWAY BUSINESS CENTER S.OF VAN BUREN ON LITCHFIELD RD. GOODYEAR, ARIZONA PALM VALLEY DYSART RD. MCDOWELL RD. FOR SALE PROMINADE CANCER TREATMENT CENTER BULLARD AVE. VAN BUREN ST. LITCHFIELD RD. SUBJECT Agua Fria Fwy. IMPROVED LOTS FOR SALE Bell Rd. Sun Valley Pkwy. y SUN FEATURES: CITY Thunderbird Rd. 17 • Entire Property: +26 Acres (10 Improved Lots) Peoria Ave. PEORIA Squaw Peak Pkw 59th Ave . Fwy . n • 1 - 6 Acre Lots For Sale or Build-to-Suit. PARADISE GLENDALE VALLEY Glendale Ave. 101 Central Ave . • Zoned I-1, Industrial with P.A.D. Overlay Black Canyo Grand Ave. 51 . Camelback Rd. Sun Valley Pkwy . SCOTTSDALE 101 44th St . • Water: 8” Main in Grant St., Camino Oro, & 140th Drive . 99th Ave . 83rd Ave GOODYEAR Beeline Hwy Litchfield Rd. Estrella Fwy • Sewer: 8” Main in Grant St. & 140th Dr. Fwy. 10 Papago Fwy. Pima Fwy Red Mountain Van Buren St. Scottsdale Rd . Buckeye Rd. Sky Harbor . b . Yuma Rd. PHOENIX . Int'l Airport . • Electricity: Arizona Public Service (APS) TOLLESON MESA Maricopa Fwy. Mesa Dr . TEMPE Main St. Dean Rd Miller Rd Jackrabbit Tr SUBJECT Watson Rd Country Clu Cotton Ln • Fiber Optics: Qwest two - 4” Conduit Stubs to Each Site Dobson Rd Broadway Rd. Mill Ave Superstition Fwy. Ogelsby Rd . 60 Cox two - 2’ ConduitBaseline Rd .Stubs to Each Site85 Baseline Rd. BUCKEYE . AHWATUKEE NORT GILBERT Rural Rd Rural 202 FOOTHILLS Price Fwy H Val Vista Dr McQueen Rd Power Rd Existing Freeways 10 CHANDLER 3200 E. Camelback Rd. STEIN KOSS, SIOR TOM LOUER, SIORProposed Suite #100 or Under Construction PRINCIPAL PRINCIPAL Phoenix, Arizona, 85018 202 Santan Fwy.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 REVIEW • Ryanair Introduces Direct Flights from Larnaka to Brussels
    2016 REVIEW SPONSORED BY: 1 www.atn.aero 2015 REVIEW • Ryanair introduces direct flights from Larnaka to Brussels JANUARY 4/1/2016 14/1/2016 • Etihad Airways today launched fresh legal action in a bid to overturn a German court’s decision to revoke the approval for 29 of its • Genève Aéroport welcomed a total of nearly 15.8 million passengers codeshare flights with airberlin in 2015 • ALTA welcomes Enrique Cueto as new President of its Executive 5/1/2016 Committee • Spirit Airlines, Inc. today announced Robert L. Fornaro has been appointed President and Chief Executive Officer, effective immediately 6/1/2016 • FAA releases B4UFLY Smartphone App 7/1/2016 • The International Air Transport Association (IATA) announced it is expanding its activities to prevent payment fraud in the air travel industry • Boeing delivered 762 commercial airplanes in 2015, 39 more than the previous year and most ever for the company as it enters its centennial year • Rynair become the first airline to carry over 100m international Source: LATAM customers in one year • American Airlines and LATAM Airlines Group are applying for • BOC Aviation orders 30 A320 Family regulatory approval to enter into a joint business (JB) to better serve their customers • Bordeaux Airport 2015 review: Nearly 5,300,000 passengers in 2015: growth of +7.6% 15/1/2016 • Etihad Airways today welcomed the ruling by the higher administrative 8/1/2016 court in Luneburg reversing an earlier judgment and allowing it to • The European Commission has approved under the EU Merger continue operating
    [Show full text]
  • FAA Annual Runway Safety Report 2009
    Air Traffic Organization Annual Runway Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, SW Safety Report 2009 Washington, DC 20591 2009-AJS-129 A Message from the FAA Administrator Dear Colleagues: We’re making progress on the issue of runway safety, but as an agency and as an industry, we need to do more. This report details the strides we’ve made over the last year. It also includes our next steps to take what is arguably one of the safest locations in all of aviation— a U.S. runway— and make it safer still. In the long term, runway safety is very, very good. Last year, we had 25 serious runway incursions. That’s out of more than 58 million operations. Serious runway incursions have dropped by more than half since 2001. Nine of those 25 serious incursions last year involved commercial aircraft. The 25 incursions were up one from the previous year, which was an all-time low. But the 2008 totals show that we must increase our vigilance. Last year, runway incursions of all types increased by some 13 percent over 2007, rising from 891 to 1,009. So far in fiscal year 2009, the data look promising with a projected drop in total incursions for the full year by some five percent and an accompanying reduction in serious incursions by at least 50 percent. These data are encouraging. But while the actual runway incursion numbers are still a very thin slice of overall operations, as an aviation professional, I believe that very good is still not good enough.
    [Show full text]
  • Airport Master Plan Update
    Airport Master Plan Update Working Paper No. 2 PHOENIX GOODYEAR AIRPORT PHOENIX, ARIZONA | MAY 2017 FAA AIP NO. 3-04-0018-21-16 ADOT NO. E7F3C PROJECT NO. AV41000072 FAA Phoenix Goodyear Airport Airport Master Plan Update Working Paper 2 Prepared for City of Phoenix Aviation Department By Armstrong Consultants, Inc. 2345 S. Alma School Road, Suite 208 Mesa, AZ 85210 In association with The Genesis Consulting Group, LLC Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Woolpert, Inc. May 2017 FAA AIP No. 3-04-0018-21-16 ADOT No. E7F3C Project No. AV41000072 FAA The preparation of this document was financed in part through a planning grant from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) as provided in the Airport and Airways Improvement Act of 1982, as amended. The contents of this report reflect the analysis and finding of Armstrong Consultants, Inc. who are responsible for the facts and accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policy of the FAA. Acceptance of this report by the FAA does not in any way constitute a commitment on the part of the United States to participate in any development depicted therein nor does it indicate that the proposed development is environmentally acceptable with applicable Public Laws. TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 3 - Aviation Activity Forecasts ....................................................................................................................... 3-1 3.1 Summary of Results .............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Runway Safety Report Safety Runway
    FAA Runway Safety Report Safety Runway FAA Runway Safety Report September 2007 September 2007 September Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue SW Washington, DC 20591 www.faa.gov OK-07-377 Message from the Administrator The primary mission of the Federal Aviation Administration is safety. It’s our bottom line. With the aviation community, we have developed the safest mode of transportation in the history of the world, and we are now enjoying the safest period in aviation history. Yet, we can never rest on our laurels because safety is the result of constant vigilance and a sharp focus on our bottom line. Managing the safety risks in the National Airspace System requires a systematic approach that integrates safety into daily operations in control towers, airports and aircraft. Using this approach, we have reduced runway incursions to historically low rates over the past few years, primarily by increasing awareness and training and deploying new technologies that provide critical information directly to flight crews and air traffic controllers. Other new initiatives and technologies, as outlined in the 2007 Runway Safety Report, will provide a means to an even safer tomorrow. With our partners, FAA will continue working to eliminate the threat of runway incursions, focusing our resources and energies where we have the best chance of achieving success. To the many dedicated professionals in the FAA and the aviation community who have worked so tirelessly to address this safety challenge, I want to extend our deepest gratitude and appreciation for the outstanding work you have done to address this ever-changing and ever-present safety threat.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 01 May 14.Indd
    www.thepeninsulaqatar.com BUSINESS | 19 SPORT | 22 Apple invests Speedster Usainn $1bn in China taxi Bolt ready for app Didi 2016 debut. SATURDAY 14 MAY 2016 • 7 SHA’BAAN 1437 • Volume 21 • Number 6796 thepeninsulaqatar @peninsulaqatar @peninsula_qatar Several medicines become Al Arabi lift Emir Volleyball Cup affordable after price cut According to data released by the 400 mg + 40mg declined from QR20 Ministry, with implementation of the to QR15.75. Prices of anti-impotence Some medicines have third phase, prices of 2,873 medicines drugs Snafi and Viagra also declined become cheaper by have been reduced. This constitutes remarkably, said pharmacy sources. 62.5 percent of the total 4,600 reg- A box of Snafi containing four tab- more than 80%. istered drugs in the country. lets of 20mg, earlier sold at QR156 is “We have noticed that some now is available at QR99.75. Price of patients with chronic diseases like Viagra has also fallen from QR156 to diabetes have started buying med- QR86 per box. Such medicines can By Sanaullah Ataullah icines from our store for months be dispensed only on a prescription The Peninsula continuously. After the price cut, by a doctor. many drugs have became afforda- Prices of a strip of 14 tablets of ble so they prefer to buy them from a gastro-resistant, Nexium 40mg, DOHA: A sharp drop in the prices of private pharmacies rather than going declined from QR117 to QR89.25. medicines in Qatar over the past two to a public hospital,” said a pharma- Prices of vitamins remain years has come as a great relief to cist working with a private pharmacy unchanged except Centrum multi- citizens and expatriates, apparently in the Airport area.
    [Show full text]
  • Arizona Superfund Program List by City
    ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY Janet Napolitano 1110 West Washington Street • Phoenix, Arizona 85007 Stephen A. Owens Governor (602) 771-2300 • www.adeq.state.az.us Director August 25, 2004 [Revised] SAU 05.07 To: Interested Parties Thru: Cynthia McNulty, Manager Technical Support Section From: Jeff Littell, Manager Site Assessment Unit Technical Support Section Re: Arizona Superfund Program List Attached, please find an updated version of the Arizona Superfund Program List (ASPL). The ASPL has been updated to add the 7th Avenue and Bethany Home Road site, which was listed on the Water Quality Assurance Revolving Fund (WQARF) Registry on August 25, 2004. Prior to July 5, 2000, the ADEQ Superfund Programs Section (SPS) published a list of sites entitled “Arizona CERCLIS Information Data System” (ACIDS). The ACIDS list has been replaced as an active list by the ASPL. The ACIDS list has been archived and is no longer being distributed or updated. The ASPL is more representative of the sites within the jurisdiction of the SPS since April 1997 (the date of the new WQARF statute). The list, which is considered an interim measure until a more complete data system is developed, is comprised of the following elements: 1) WQARF Registry Sites; 2) National Priorities List (NPL) sites; and 3) Department of Defense (DOD) sites requiring SPS oversight. A WQARF site is defined in statute as the “geographical areal extent of contamination” (Arizona Revised Statutes § 49-281.14). With respect to the ASPL, the “Program Status” column is intended to provide information on historical and current activities under the jurisdiction of the program.
    [Show full text]
  • Propwash Issue 5
    An Informational Bulletin from December 31, 2010 ADOT-MPD-Aeronautics Group Volume 2, Issue 1 2012-2016 ACIP ~ Document Quarterly Contract/Agreement & Public Meetings Scheduled Based Aircraft Reports Reviews, 30% Plan Re- views, & 100% Plan The draft Five-Year Transportation Facilities We have achieved the best results for a Reviews Construction Program includes all of ADOT’s single quarter of Quarterly Based Aircraft planned projects for the years listed. In calen- Report submissions that we can remem- WE ARE MAKING SOME FRE- dar year 2011, for example, we are developing QUENT COMMENTS DURING ber. All but 6 airports submitted their 3rd the 2012-2016 Program. It includes both pro- REVIEWS AND WOULD LIKE TO Quarter 2010 Based Aircraft Report to SHARE THESE WITH YOU. gram funding levels and lists specific projects for Arizona’s highways and their related subpro- ADOT on time. • ENSURE YOUR PROJECT grams, freeways, and airports. We were happy to have a lot of first time DOCUMENTS ARE NOT UNDER ANY COPYRIGHT The draft 2012-2016 Airports Capital Improve- airports submit a report—thank you and TO THE CONSULTANT ~ ment Program (ACIP) portion of this document keep it up! THESE ARE PUBLIC DOCU- is incorporated in its entirety directly into the These reports are a grant agreement as- MENTS. Five-Year Program document in March each surance and regular submission to ADOT • ENSURE A REFERENCE TO year and will also be available separately on the THE STATE ADOA fulfills part of your grant compliance. TRAVEL POLICY RATES IS ADOT website at: Don’t forget ~ 4th quarter ends on INCLUDED ~ WE CANNOT http://www.azdot.gov/mpd/ 12/31/10 and reports are due to your REIMBURSE YOU FOR Airport_Development/index.asp MORE THAN THE ADOA The State Transportation Board has tentatively ADOT grant managers by 1/15/11.
    [Show full text]
  • Aviation Week & Space Technology
    WorldMags.net WorldMags.net WorldMags.net WorldMags.net WorldMags.net WorldMags.net AVIATION WEEK & SPACE TECHNOLOGY Editor-In-Chief Joseph C. Anselmo Executive Editor James R. Asker Managing Editors Jen DiMascio, JensWorldMags.net Flottau, Graham Warwick Assistant Managing Editor Michael Stearns Associate Managing Editor Andrea Hollowell Art Director Lisa Caputo Director, Editorial and Online Production Michael O. Lavitt Director, Digital Content Strategy Rupa Haria DEFENSE, SPACE AND SECURITY Editors Jen DiMascio (Managing Editor), Jeferson Morris (Associate Managing Editor), Michael Bruno, Amy Butler, Michael Fabey, Sean Meade, Frank Morring, Jr., Bill Sweetman (Chief Editor, Defense Technology Edition) CIVIL AVIATION/MAINTENANCE, REPAIR AND OVERHAUL Editors Jens Flottau (Managing Editor), Madhu Unnikrishnan (Associate Managing Editor), Sean Broderick, Cathy Buyck, John Croft, William Garvey, Fred George, Rupa Haria, Molly McMillin, Guy Norris, Bradley Perrett, Jessica Salerno, Adrian Schofield, Brian Sumers, Lee Ann Shay (Chief Editor, MRO Edition) Chief Aircraft Evaluation Editor Fred George For individual e-mail addresses, telephone numbers and more, go to www.AviationWeek.com/editors EDITORIAL OFFICES 1166 Ave of Americas, New York, N.Y. 10036 Phone: +1 (212) 204-4200 BUREAUS AUCKLAND 53 Staincross St., Green Bay, Auckland 0604, New Zealand Phone: +64 (27) 578-7544 Bureau Chief Adrian Schofield BEIJING D-1601, A6 Jianguo Menwai Ave., Chaoyang, Beijing 100022, China Phone: +86 (186) 0002-4422 Bureau Chief Bradley Perrett BRUSSELS Rue de L’Aqueduc 134, 1050 Brussels, Belgium Phone: +32 (2) 648-7774 Bureau Chief Cathy Buyck CHICAGO 330 N. Wabash Ave., Suite 2300, Chicago, Ill. Phone: +1 (312) 840-8445 Bureau Chief Lee Ann Shay COLUMBIA, S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Qatar Pioneers Building Standards
    BUSINESS | Page 1 SPORT | Page 1 QFA president is elected Gulf INDEX Football DOW JONES QE NYMEX QATAR 2 – 9, 28 COMMENT 26, 27 Qatar ‘keen to enhance REGION 10 BUSINESS 1 – 8, 14 – 16 Federation 17,482.00 9,638.26 48.41 ARAB WORLD 10, 11 CLASSIFIED 9 – 13 energy co-operation +67.00 -175.70 -0.26 INTERNATIONAL 12 – 25 SPORTS 1 – 12 +0.38% -1.79% -0.53% with Bangladesh’ chief Latest Figures published in QATAR since 1978 MONDAY Vol. XXXVII No. 10097 May 23, 2016 Sha’baan 16, 1437 AH GULF TIMES www. gulf-times.com 2 Riyals Emir meets Pakistani minister Qatar In brief TURKEY | Politics Erdogan ally pioneers is new premier Turkey’s Transport Minister Binali Yildirim will be formally appointed as head of the ruling party and as the new prime minister yesterday, strengthening building the grip on power of his mentor President Recep Tayyip Erdogan. Yildirim – a longstanding and faithful ally of Erdogan – is the only candidate at an extraordinary congress of the ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP) standards yesterday that will choose the party chairman, meaning he will Qatar Construction Specifications Even individuals’ awareness about become prime minister. His main have become binding for all the quality of materials to be used in task in the post, observers say, contractors and consultant building their houses has increased, will be to push through a change engineers in the state prompting them to improve the dura- in the constitution to transform bility of their property. Turkey from a parliamentary to a By Ayman Adly Dr al-Kuwari also stressed the need presidential system.
    [Show full text]
  • Pinal Airpark and San Manuel Airport Rates and Fees Survey Analysis Update Pinal County Contract No: ED14-001
    Pinal Airpark and San Manuel Airport Rates and Fees Survey Analysis Update Pinal County Contract No: ED14-001 Draft Report August 2019 Prepared For: Pinal County Airport Economic Development Department 7878 North 16th Street Suite 300 Phoenix, Arizona 85020 P. 602.957.1155 www.dibblecorp.com Dibble project No. 1015048.1 Preface The following sections of the 2016 Draft Pinal Airpark and San Manuel Airport Rates and Fees Survey Analysis have been updated based on review of current (2019) rates and fees at the comparable airports within this study. Revised Section: Summary of Survey Analysis and Key Findings Airport: San Manuel (E77) T-Hangar (non-specific size) (Monthly) Of the comparable airports surveyed, Eloy Municipal’s rate has increased since 2016. The revised monthly T-hangar rate for Eloy was used to recalculate the average rate. The results are as follows: High Rate: $215.36 Eloy Municipal Airport Low Rate: $70.00 Cochise County Airport Average Rate: $112.59 (excluding San Manuel existing rate) Existing E77 Rate: $160.00 Recommendation: The suggested rate of $185.00 per month as described in the 2016 Draft Analysis remains valid per the reasons provided. No change to the suggested rate is recommended. It should be noted that the rate charged for hangars of non-specific type and size at other comparable airports in the Analysis (see San Manuel Airport Rates and Fees Comparison Summary (2019) table) averages $193.75. At $185, this rate would also be in line with other airports in the area should Pinal County wish to charge for other hangars other than a T-hangar.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Update Executive Summary Background
    Master Plan 2018 Update Executive Summary Background Phoenix Goodyear Airport (GYR) is owned and operated by the City of Phoenix. Located in the northern portion of the City of Goodyear, in the west valley of the Phoenix metropolitan area and south of Interstate 10, GYR is one of three airports owned by the City of Phoenix. The City of Phoenix purchased GYR in 1968 for use as a general aviation reliever facility to Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport, with the subsequent purchase of Phoenix Deer Valley Airport to serve a similar support role in accommodating general aviation activity. GYR was originally established in 1941 as Naval Air Facility Litchfield Park. After World War II, it remained an operational facility, however, it served primarily as an aircraft storage and decommissioning facility from 1945 to 1965. Since the airport’s purchase, the City of Phoenix has invested many resources into the continued maintenance and development of the facility, from a new terminal building to T-hangars and tie-downs, aircraft parking apron expansion, and a new maintenance facility. The Master Plan represents another step in the City of Phoenix’s commitment to support the regional general aviation demand and business opportunities for the west valley. The Airport’s boundaries encompass 789 acres and its facilities serve a wide variety of users including general aviation operators such as flight schools, corporate and private pilots, and industrial aviation consisting of aircraft maintenance and repair. The Airport’s single runway, Runway 03-21, is 8,500 feet long and is designed to accommodate aircraft as large as a Boeing 767.
    [Show full text]