2015 REVIEW • Ryanair Introduces Direct Flights from Larnaka to Brussels
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
JANUARY European Parliament Vote on Airport Charges (15 January)
REVIEW www.airtransportnews.aero JANUARY European Parliament vote on airport charges (15 January) he European Parliament concluded its first reading on a proposed Directive on airport charges, initially the Directive will only incentivise conflicts between airlines and airports, resulting in uncertainty over infra - adopted by the European Commission a year ago. ACI EUROPE is appreciative of the European Parlia - structure investments and potentially delaying much needed capacity development. Olivier Jankovec added: T ment’s work to improve the proposal of the European Commission, but considers that serious concerns "That the Directive is silent on the need for airports to be incentivised to invest in time for the new facilities regarding fundamental issues remain. These include risking costly and damaging over-regulation as well as com - to match demand, is puzzling. It shows that the Directive not only remains imbalanced in favour of airlines but promising the ability of European airports to finance much needed infrastructure and capacity development. also fails to reflect that the interests of the airlines and that of the travelling public are not the same." Whilst the European Commission proposed to apply the Directive to all airports with more than 1 million pas - Responding to the vote of the European Parliament on Airport Charges, IACA is extremely disappointed that an sengers per year, the European Parliament increased this figure to 5 million, leaving States still free to apply opportunity to address the unbalanced relationship between the fully deregulated airline sector and their mo - the Directive to airports below this threshold. As most European airports now operate in a highly competitive nopolistic service provider (airports) has been missed. -
Policy Brief
4 | Issue 01/2016 POLICY BRIEF THREE QUESTIONS FOR NEW A4E WORKING GROUP DANIEL WEDER STAKEHOLDER ON ENVIRONMENT CORNER On the occasion of the etc.) and not a pure presentation of the cost-reduction European Commission’s INSIDE approach. Today‘s “European Strategy for A4E technological possibilities, which would clearly Low-Emission Mobility” improve the situation, are not, or only seldom, on 20 July, A4E set used in Air Navigation Services (for instance out its frst priorities in Virtual Centres). on environmental policy: ICAO’s global Question: On June 28, the CEOs of A4E market-based measure and government airlines presented operational, technological support for sustainable low carbon fuels. and political suggestions to limit the impact Daniel Weder became CEO of skyguide, the of controller’s strikes and are now looking A4E calls on all governments to support Swiss air navigation service provider, in 2007. towards ANSPs for support in implementing ICAO’s (International Civil Aviation Orga- them. What’s your position regarding the A4E nisation) proposeD carbon offset scheme Question: What were your initial thoughts Call for Action? to cap emissions from 2020. During the when you frst heard of A4E? Weder: As for skyguide, we do generally review of the EU Emission TraDing Scheme Weder: With A4E we have now a strong agree with the “9 principles“ put forward by (ETS) for aviation later this year, the Euro- customer voice coming up with focussed A4E concerning strikes in Air Traffc Control. pean legislator should ensure the compe- positions and ideas. Solution oriented airlines However, there are two caveats. -
The Case of Israel's Omission from Airline Route Maps March 22, 2017
Discriminatory Product Differentiation: The Case of Israel’s Omission from Airline Route Maps March 22, 2017 Joel Waldfogel Frederick R. Kappel Chair in Applied Economics Carlson School of Management & Department of Economics University of Minnesota 3-177 CarlSMgmt 321 19th Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA Tel (612) 626-7128 Fax (612) 626-1335 Email [email protected] Web http://www.tc.umn.edu/~jwaldfog/ & Paul M. Vaaler John and Bruce Mooty Chair in Law & Business Carlson School of Management & Law School University of Minnesota 3-424 CarlSMgmt 321 19th Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA Tel (612) 625-4951 Fax (612) 626-1316 Email [email protected] Web https://www.law.umn.edu/profiles/paul-vaaler Acknowledgments: Paul M. Vaaler (Contact Author). Joel Waldfogel is also an affiliated faculty member at the University of Minnesota Law School. This research benefitted from presentation at seminars sponsored by the University of Minnesota Law School and Humphrey School of Public Affairs, and the University of Florida Levin School of Law. Nicholas Muellerleile provided research assistance. This research benefitted from comments by Brooke Goldstein, Oren Gross, Eugene Kontorovich, Robert Kudrle, Benjamin Ryberg, and D. Daniel Sokol. All errors are the authors’. 0 Discriminatory Product Differentiation: The Case of Israel’s Omission from Airline Route Maps ABSTRACT While product differentiation is generally benign, it can be employed to discriminate against customer groups, either to enhance profitability by appealing to discriminatory customers or in unprofitable ways that indulge owners’ tastes for discrimination. We explore discriminatory product differentiation by international airlines through their depictions of Israel on online route maps and whether their online inflight menus include kosher meal options. -
General Air Transportation Conditions for the Carriage of Passengers and Baggage Jetsmart Airlines
GENERAL AIR TRANSPORTATION CONDITIONS FOR THE CARRIAGE OF PASSENGERS AND BAGGAGE JETSMART AIRLINES The following General Air Transportation Conditions for the Carriage of Passengers and Baggage (hereinafter the "General Conditions") shall apply to all national and international air transport services carried out by JetSMART Airlines, and for all legal purposes are understood to be incorporated in the Airline Ticket which defines the rights and obligations of JetSMART Airlines as Carrier and its passengers. I. DEFINITIONS. - For the purposes of these General Conditions, each term described below will be understood as follows: "Ticket" or "Airline Ticket" represents the group of documents that establish the terms and conditions of the air transportation and baggage control contract (where applicable), whether issued manually, electronically or by any equivalent means and which are found in all or some of the following documents: (i) the current General Conditions; (ii) the magnetically recorded electronic ticket; (iii) the Special Conditions applicable to the contracted transport, the fare paid by the passenger and other optional services purchased with the ticket; (iv) the receipt of the purchase operation issued by the Company; (v) the Boarding Card or Boarding Pass; and, (vi) any communications and booking fees approved by aviation authorities in countries that require it. “General Conditions”, refer to the conditions that determine the air transport contract between JetSMART Airlines and the Passenger. “International Convention(s)”, refers to any of the following instruments, as applicable: (i) Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules Relating to International Carriage by Air, signed in Warsaw on October 12th, 1929 (commonly known as the Warsaw Convention), and subsequent modifications; and (ii) the Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules for International Carriage by Air, signed in Montreal, Canada, on May 18, 1999 (commonly known as the Montreal Convention); and, (iii) Decision 619 of the Andean Community. -
Magisterarbeit / Master's Thesis
MAGISTERARBEIT / MASTER’S THESIS Titel der Magisterarbeit / Title of the Master‘s Thesis Wahrnehmung und Bewertung von Krisenkommunikation Eine Untersuchung am Beispiel des Flugzeugunglücks der Lufthansa-Tochter Germanwings am 24. März 2015 verfasst von / submitted by Raffaela ECKEL, Bakk. phil. angestrebter akademischer Grad / in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Magistra der Philosophie (Mag. phil.) Wien, 2016 / Vienna, 2016 Studienkennzahl lt. Studienblatt / degree programme code as it appears on the student record sheet: A 066 841 Studienrichtung lt. Studienblatt / degree programme as it appears on the student record sheet: Publizistik- und Kommunikationswissenschaft Betreut von / Supervisor: Univ.-Prof. Dr. Sabine Einwiller Eidesstattliche Erklärung Ich erkläre hiermit an Eides statt, dass ich die vorliegende Arbeit selbstständig und ohne Benutzung anderer als der angegebenen Hilfsmittel angefertigt habe. Die aus fremden Quellen direkt oder indirekt übernommenen Gedanken sind als solche kenntlich ge- macht. Die Arbeit wurde bisher in gleicher oder ähnlicher Form keiner anderen Prü- fungsbehörde vorgelegt und auch noch nicht veröffentlicht. Wien, August 2016 Raffaela Eckel Inhaltsverzeichnis 1 Einführung und Problemstellung ......................................................................................... 1 1.1 Theoretische Hinführung: Beitrag der Wissenschaft zu einer gelungenen Krisenkommunikation.................................................................................................... 2 1.2 -
Total Mahb Group Traffic 2015
Annual Report 2015 309 TOTAL MAHB GROUP TRAFFIC 2015 PASSENGER MOVEMENTS 2015 2014 +/- MY passengers [international] 40,044,823 40,149,537 -0.3% [domestic] 43,784,946 43,198,466 1.4% [Total] 83,829,769 83,348,003 0.6% ISG passengers [international] 9,703,594 8,603,626 12.8% [domestic] 18,581,984 15,028,257 23.6% [Total] 28,285,578 23,631,883 19.7% Total MAHB Group 112,115,347 106,979,886 4.8% AIRCRAFT MOVEMENTS 2015 2014 +/- MY commercial aircraft [international] 295,485 287,893 2.6% [domestic] 519,855 503,669 3.2% [Total] 815,340 791,562 3.0% ISG commercial aircraft [international] 76,548 66,991 14.3% [domestic] 129,632 105,817 22.5% [Total] 206,180 172,808 19.3% Total commercial aircraft 1,021,520 964,370 5.9% MY All other aircraft 123,373 137,171 -10.1% ISG All other aircraft 12,446 12,569 -1.0% Total MAHB Group 1,157,339 1,114,110 3.9% CARGO MOVEMENTS [kg] 2015 2014 +/- MY cargo movements [international] 780,457,278 823,010,848 -5.2% [domestic] 193,872,919 184,452,041 5.1% [Total] 974,330,197 1,007,462,889 -3.3% ISG cargo movements [international] 41,773,091 37,873,360 10.3% [domestic] 4,905,686 4,505,520 8.9% [Total] 46,678,777 42,378,880 10.1% Total MAHB Group 1,021,008,974 1,049,841,769 -2.7% Note : MY - MAHB Airports in Malaysia ISG - Istanbul Sabiha Gokcen International Airport 310 Malaysia Airports Holdings Berhad TRAFFIC 2015 MALAYSIA OPERATIONS PASSENGER MOVEMENTS 2015 2014 +/- Terminal passengers [international] 39,716,390 39,780,623 -0.2% Terminal passengers [domestic] 43,649,823 42,981,566 1.6% Transit passengers 463,556 -
Aircraft Pilot and Passenger Protection Act 3 O.S
Aircraft Pilot and Passenger Protection Act 3 O.S. § 120.1 – 120.14 SECTION 120.1 A. This act shall be known and may be cited as the “Aircraft Pilot and Passenger Protection Act”. B. It is the intent of this act to: 1. Regulate obstructions to air navigation that have the potential of endangering the lives and property of aircraft pilots and passengers and those that live or work in the vicinity of public-use airports; that may affect existing and future instrument approaches to a public-use airport; and that may reduce the size of areas available for the landing, takeoff and maneuvering of aircraft thus impairing the utility of a public-use airport and the public investment therein; 2. Regulate the use of land in close proximity to a public-use airport to ensure compatibility with aircraft operations; and 3. Provide specific powers and duties to the Oklahoma Aeronautics Commission in the interest of the health, safety and welfare of the public so that the state may properly fulfill its duty to ensure that land use around a public-use airport is compatible with normal airport operations including the landing and takeoff of aircraft. C. All heights or surfaces set forth in this act are from the standards set forth in Subpart C of Federal Aviation Regulations (FAR) Part 77. D. Depending upon the type of survey used, an adjustment will be made in accordance with Federal Aviation Administration standards to the horizontal and vertical measurements of the proposed structure as follows: Survey Horizontal Survey Vertical Type Adjustment Type Adjustment 1 +20 ft (6 m) A +3 ft (1 m) 2 +50 ft (15 m) B +10 ft (3 m) 3 +100 ft (30 m) C +20 ft (6 m) 4 +250 ft (75 m) D +50 ft (15 m) 5 +500 ft (150 m) E +125 ft (38 m) If the survey type (horizontal and vertical) is not certified by a licensed engineer or a licensed surveyor, a horizontal adjustment of plus or minus two hundred fifty (250) feet and a vertical adjustment of fifty (50) feet will be applied to the structure measurements. -
BAGGAGE ALLOWANCE for Worldskills Kazan 2019 Participants and Guests
BAGGAGE ALLOWANCE For WorldSkills Kazan 2019 Participants and Guests CONTENTS CONTENTS ........................................................................................................................................................ 2 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................ 3 INITIAL INFORMATION ..................................................................................................................................... 4 AEROFLOT RUSSIAN AIRLINES ........................................................................................................................ 5 S7 AIRLINES ...................................................................................................................................................... 8 UTAIR COMPANY ............................................................................................................................................. 9 TURKISH AIRLINES ......................................................................................................................................... 12 FINNAIR AIRLINES .......................................................................................................................................... 13 AIR BALTIC ...................................................................................................................................................... 15 CZECH AIRLINES ............................................................................................................................................ -
European Airlines Exposed As Significant Opponents of EU Climate
EMBARGOED to 00:01 GMT, June 10th, 2021 European airlines exposed as significant opponents of EU climate policy New documents shed light on systematic anti-climate lobbying campaign amid billions in government bailouts Europe's largest airlines - which collectively received €30 billion in taxpayer support during the COVID-19 pandemic - have emerged as some of the most significant opponents of ambitious climate policy in the region, according to a new report by InfluenceMap. These efforts have continued even though many companies are now being part-owned by governments due to the COVID-19 bailout agreements. InfluenceMap's report is based on nearly 800 evidence pieces as well as dozens of documents obtained by Freedom of Information requests. Taken together, they shed new light on the extent of the aviation sector's anti-climate lobbying targeting the EU and European governments. This is despite the sector publicly declaring its commitment to net-zero emissions for European aviation by 2050. The report details the industry's two-level strategy to avoid effective regulation. The sector is lobbying against EU- level policies - such as the Sustainable Aviation Fuels blending mandate and the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) while also trying to weaken the international carbon offsetting scheme, CORSIA. Amidst all of this, airlines have initiated extensive climate-focused PR campaigns - like those undertaken by the oil & gas sector - to deflect responsibility for the sector’s carbon footprint and to tackle growing ‘flight shame’ among the public. Information revealed in the report includes: • The ongoing industry campaign to weaken the EU ETS with regards to aviation and replace it with the CORSIA offsetting scheme, including direct lobbying by Lufthansa, Air France-KLM, and International Airlines Group (IAG). -
A Clean Slate Airbus Pivots to Hydrogen For
November 2020 HOW NOT TO DEVELOP DEVELOP TO NOT HOW FIGHTERYOUR OWN SPACE THREATS SPACE AIR GETSCARGO LIFT A A CLEAN SLATE AIRBUS HYDROGEN TO PIVOTS FOR ZERO-CARBON ‘MOONSHOT’ www.aerosociety.com AEROSPACE November 2020 Volume 47 Number 11 Royal Aeronautical Society 11–15 & 19–21 JANUARY 2021 | ONLINE REIMAGINED The 2021 AIAA SciTech Forum, the world’s largest event for aerospace research and development, will be a comprehensive virtual experience spread over eight days. More than 2,500 papers will be presented across 50 technical areas including fluid dynamics; applied aerodynamics; guidance, navigation, and control; and structural dynamics. The high-level sessions will explore how the diversification of teams, industry sectors, technologies, design cycles, and perspectives can all be leveraged toward innovation. Hear from high-profile industry leaders including: Eileen Drake, CEO, Aerojet Rocketdyne Richard French, Director, Business Development and Strategy, Space Systems, Rocket Lab Jaiwon Shin, Executive Vice President, Urban Air Mobility Division, Hyundai Steven Walker, Vice President and CTO, Lockheed Martin Corporation Join fellow innovators in a shared mission of collaboration and discovery. SPONSORS: As of October 2020 REGISTER NOW aiaa.org/2021SciTech SciTech_Nov_AEROSPACE PRESS.indd 1 16/10/2020 14:03 Volume 47 Number 11 November 2020 EDITORIAL Contents Drone wars are here Regulars 4 Radome 12 Transmission What happens when ‘precision effects’ from the air are available to everyone? The latest aviation and Your letters, emails, tweets aeronautical intelligence, and social media feedback. Nagorno-Karabakh is now the latest conflict where a new way of remote analysis and comment. war is evolving with cheap persistent UAVs, micro-munitions and loitering 58 The Last Word anti-radar drones, striking tanks, vehicles, artillery pieces and even SAM 11 Pushing the Envelope Keith Hayward considers sites with lethal precision. -
Report A-045/2011 Location Flight Data Report Crew
REPORT A-045/2011 DATA SUMMARY LOCATION Date and time Saturday, 12 November 2011, at 11:12 local time1 Site Andratx, wooded area in La Trapa (Balearic Islands) AIRCRAFT Registration G-WOOW Type and model HUGHES 369E Operator Private Engines Type and model ROLLS ROYCE 250-C20B Number 1 CREW Pilot in command Age 53 years old Licence Private Helicopter Pilot (PPL(H)) Total flight hours 110 h Flight hours on the type 40 h INJURIES Fatal Serious Minor/None Crew 1 Passengers 1 Third persons DAMAGE Aircraft Destroyed Third parties 450 m2 of low lands and shrubs FLIGHT DATA Operation General aviation – Private Phase of flight Low level maneuvering – Flight REPORT Date of approval 28 November 2012 1 All times in this report are local unless otherwise specified. To obtain UTC subtract one hour from local time. 133 Report A-045/2011 Addenda Bulletin 5/2012 1. FACTUAL INFORMATION 1.1. History of the flight On Saturday, 12 November 2011, a Hughes 369E aircraft, registration G-WOOW, took off from the Son Bonet Airport (Balearic Islands) at approximately 10:40 on a private flight with two persons onboard. The flight plan filed indicated the flight was to last 1 hour and 15 minutes. The destination was the same departure airport and the aircraft had enough fuel to last 2 hours and 40 minutes. The aircraft’s two occupants were the pilot, who flew this aircraft frequently due to his friendship with its owner, and a passenger, who was sitting in the free front seat next to the pilot’s and who had been friends with the pilot for about 20 years. -
Crisis Communication
Crisis communication The case of the airline industry during the COVID-19 pandemic Marlies Nittmann Supervisor: Robert Ciuchita Department of Marketing Hanken School of Economics Helsinki 2021 i HANKEN SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS Department of: Type of work: Marketing Master’s Thesis Author: Date: 31.3.2021 Marlies Nittmann Title of thesis: Crisis Communication: The case of the airline industry during the COVID-19 pandemic Abstract: Due to the increasing frequency of crises and the diversification of their causes, a wide range of research has been completed in this field. However, the crisis communication literature has not yet thoroughly covered the topic of public health crises and the corporate communication during such a global event. Further, examples of crisis communication used by companies in particular industries are limited. Therefore, this thesis studies the crisis communication literature to receive a better understanding of the theory before looking at the corporate communications from four European airline companies. A comparative case study approach is used in order to receive an insight into the communication strategies applied by the aviation industry during a pandemic. A quantitative study is conducted, and the web pages, newsletters and press releases are analysed. Based on the conducted research, six main topics of communication are established and compared to the previous findings of the literature. Even though the four case companies share similar information with their stakeholders, they differ in the way they approach the messages, how they communicate and when they engage with their stakeholders. This study adds to the crisis communication literature focusing on public health crises, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as to the literature covering crisis communication in the aviation industry.