DOCSLIB.ORG

Total Mahb Group Traffic 2015

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Total Mahb Group Traffic 2015 Annual Report 2015 309 TOTAL MAHB GROUP TRAFFIC 2015 PASSENGER MOVEMENTS 2015 2014 +/- MY passengers [international] 40,044,823 40,149,537 -0.3% [domestic] 43,784,946 43,198,466 1.4% [Total] 83,829,769 83,348,003 0.6% ISG passengers [international] 9,703,594 8,603,626 12.8% [domestic] 18,581,984 15,028,257 23.6% [Total] 28,285,578 23,631,883 19.7% Total MAHB Group 112,115,347 106,979,886 4.8% AIRCRAFT MOVEMENTS 2015 2014 +/- MY commercial aircraft [international] 295,485 287,893 2.6% [domestic] 519,855 503,669 3.2% [Total] 815,340 791,562 3.0% ISG commercial aircraft [international] 76,548 66,991 14.3% [domestic] 129,632 105,817 22.5% [Total] 206,180 172,808 19.3% Total commercial aircraft 1,021,520 964,370 5.9% MY All other aircraft 123,373 137,171 -10.1% ISG All other aircraft 12,446 12,569 -1.0% Total MAHB Group 1,157,339 1,114,110 3.9% CARGO MOVEMENTS [kg] 2015 2014 +/- MY cargo movements [international] 780,457,278 823,010,848 -5.2% [domestic] 193,872,919 184,452,041 5.1% [Total] 974,330,197 1,007,462,889 -3.3% ISG cargo movements [international] 41,773,091 37,873,360 10.3% [domestic] 4,905,686 4,505,520 8.9% [Total] 46,678,777 42,378,880 10.1% Total MAHB Group 1,021,008,974 1,049,841,769 -2.7% Note : MY - MAHB Airports in Malaysia ISG - Istanbul Sabiha Gokcen International Airport 310 Malaysia Airports Holdings Berhad TRAFFIC 2015 MALAYSIA OPERATIONS PASSENGER MOVEMENTS 2015 2014 +/- Terminal passengers [international] 39,716,390 39,780,623 -0.2% Terminal passengers [domestic] 43,649,823 42,981,566 1.6% Transit passengers 463,556 585,814 -20.9% Total passenger movements 83,829,769 83,348,003 0.6% AIRCRAFT MOVEMENTS 2015 2014 +/- Commercial aircraft [international] 295,485 287,893 2.6% Commercial aircraft [domestic] 519,855 503,669 3.2% Total commercial aircraft 815,340 791,562 3.0% All other aircraft 123,373 137,171 -10.1% Total aircraft movements 938,713 928,733 1.1% CARGO MOVEMENTS [kg] 2015 2014 +/- Cargo movements [international] 765,529,987 804,733,788 -4.9% Cargo movements [domestic] 188,240,065 177,747,158 5.9% Transit cargo 20,560,145 24,981,943 -17.7% Total cargo movements 974,330,197 1,007,462,889 -3.3% MAIL MOVEMENTS [kg] 2015 2014 +/- Mail movements [international] 33,407,606 32,116,806 4.0% Mail movements [domestic] 8,826,055 9,192,037 -4.0% Transit mail 25,038 54,028 -53.7% Total mail movements 42,258,699 41,362,871 2.2% Annual Report 2015 311 PASSENGER MOVEMENTS 2015 MALAYSIA OPERATIONS AIRPORTS DOMESTIC INTERNATIONAL TOTAL TRANSIT Arrival Departure Total Arrival Departure Total 2015* 2014* % + / - Domestic Int’l Total KLIA 7,130,271 7,048,726 14,178,997 17,060,630 17,377,599 34,438,229 48,938,424 48,930,409 0.02% 0 321,198 321,198 Penang 1,852,652 1,875,936 3,728,588 1,264,429 1,258,938 2,523,367 6,258,756 6,041,583 3.6% 5,719 1,082 6,801 Kota Kinabalu 2,451,182 2,457,011 4,908,193 824,879 835,299 1,660,178 6,573,461 6,792,968 -3.2% 3,068 2,022 5,090 Kuching 2,235,729 2,228,243 4,463,972 142,321 151,796 294,117 4,772,453 4,852,822 -1.7% 10,265 4,099 14,364 Langkawi 1,078,072 1,081,185 2,159,257 86,643 90,277 176,920 2,336,177 2,221,997 5.1% 0 0 0 Kota Bharu 1,027,197 1,036,548 2,063,745 0 0 0 2,063,747 1,800,836 14.6% 2 0 2 Ipoh 29,594 28,735 58,329 80,623 83,654 164,277 222,606 98,768 125.4% 0 0 0 Kuala Terengganu 424,058 429,704 853,762 1,765 1,712 3,477 857,239 842,651 1.7% 0 0 0 Alor Setar 356,669 360,135 716,804 833 1,392 2,225 719,029 660,264 8.9% 0 0 0 Melaka 23,619 24,321 47,940 11,151 10,619 21,770 69,710 14,178 391.7% 0 0 0 Subang 1,378,958 1,374,211 2,753,169 153,693 152,173 305,866 3,059,144 2,762,556 10.7% 77 32 109 Kuantan 126,729 125,761 252,490 19,742 19,877 39,619 292,109 314,130 195.8% 0 0 0 Tioman 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9,217 - 0 0 0 Pangkor 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 205 - 0 0 0 Redang 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11,087 - 0 0 0 Labuan 321,957 319,852 641,809 19 18 37 684,108 789,494 -13.3% 42,262 0 42,262 Lahad Datu 71,122 72,532 143,654 0 0 0 143,654 161,230 -10.9% 0 0 0 Sandakan 415,476 422,250 837,726 14 28 42 853,411 900,016 -5.2% 15,643 0 15,643 Tawau 589,808 593,090 1,182,898 9,080 11,814 20,894 1,203,792 1,218,616 -1.2% 0 0 0 Bintulu 388,622 390,791 779,413 0 0 0 800,008 832,440 -3.9% 20,595 0 20,595 Miri 1,084,637 1,091,936 2,176,573 31,416 33,924 65,340 2,249,206 2,363,080 -4.8% 7,293 0 7,293 Sibu 717,427 721,043 1,438,470 32 0 32 1,454,360 1,440,935 0.9% 15,858 0 15,858 Mulu 26,168 25,219 51,387 0 0 0 51,387 60,761 -15.4% 0 0 0 Limbang 29,280 29,020 58,300 0 0 0 58,300 63,870 -8.7% 0 0 0 STOL Sabah 2,044 1,963 4,007 0 0 0 5,309 4,590 15.7% 1,302 0 1,302 STOL Sarawak 73,080 77,260 150,340 0 0 0 163,379 159,300 2.6% 13,039 0 13,039 Peninsular Malaysia 13,427,819 13,385,262 26,813,081 18,679,509 18,996,241 37,675,750 64,816,941 63,707,881 1.7% 5,798 322,312 328,110 Sabah 3,851,589 3,866,698 7,718,287 833,992 847,159 1,681,151 9,463,735 9,866,914 -4.1% 62,275 2,022 64,297 Sarawak 4,554,943 4,563,512 9,118,455 173,769 185,720 359,489 9,549,093 9,773,208 -2.3% 67,050 4,099 71,149 Total 2015 21,834,351 21,815,472 43,649,823 19,687,270 20,029,120 39,716,390 83,829,769 83,348,003 0.6% 135,123 328,433 463,556 Total 2014 21,490,239 21,491,327 42,981,566 19,833,026 19,947,597 39,780,623 83,348,003 216,900 368,914 585,814 % change 1.6% 1.5% 1.6% -0.7% 0.4% -0.2% 0.6% -37.7% -11.0% -20.9% Note : * Including transit passengers 312 Malaysia Airports Holdings Berhad PASSENGER MOVEMENTS 2015 MALAYSIA OPERATIONS PASSENGER MOVEMENTS AT ALL MAHB AIRPORTS IN MALAYSIA 2015 9,000,000 8,165,603 8,000,000 7,303,698 7,132,225 6,998,083 7,208,203 7,165,855 6,868,685 7,000,000 6,636,598 6,803,763 6,655,645 6,468,735 6,422,676 6,000,000 5,000,000 4,000,000 3,000,000 2,000,000 1,000,000 3,336,167 3,300,431 3,078,743 3,389,992 3,414,287 3,889,411 3,258,517 3,545,246 3,271,881 3,860,344 3,287,627 3,710,456 3,470,842 3,737,361 3,509,621 3,656,234 3,098,365 3,557,280 3,162,265 3,260,411 3,203,018 3,665,667 3,953,490 4,212,113 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC International Domestic Total Annual Report 2015 313 PASSENGER MOVEMENTS 2015 MALAYSIA OPERATIONS PASSENGER MOVEMENTS AT KL INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 2015 6,000,000 4,837,603 5,000,000 4,224,929 4,098,838 4,188,283 4,209,581 3,996,961 3,976,320 3,998,700 3,980,665 3,755,051 3,852,289 3,819,204 4,000,000 3,000,000 2,000,000 1,418,265 1,246,488 1,129,194 1,247,155 1,172,683 1,195,920 1,180,899 1,168,655 1,209,146 1,064,928 1,058,307 1,087,357 1,000,000 2,938,654 2,667,694 2,978,441 2,847,126 2,851,683 2,826,017 2,992,363 3,028,682 2,683,634 2,754,276 2,771,519 3,419,338 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC International Domestic Total 314 Malaysia Airports Holdings Berhad PASSENGER MOVEMENTS (2006 - 2015) MALAYSIA OPERATIONS AIRPORTS 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 % + / - KLIA 24,129,748 26,453,379 27,529,355 29,682,093 34,087,636 37,704,510 39,887,866 47,498,157 48,930,409 48,938,424 0.02% Penang 3,103,772 3,173,117 3,405,762 3,325,423 4,166,969 4,600,274 4,767,815 5,487,751 6,041,583 6,258,756 3.6% Kota Kinabalu 4,015,221 4,399,939 4,689,164 4,868,526 5,223,454 5,808,639 5,848,135 6,935,797 6,792,968 6,573,461 -3.2% Kuching 3,196,352 3,236,468 3,238,614 3,574,632 3,684,517 4,286,722 4,186,523 4,871,036 4,852,822 4,772,453 -1.7% Langkawi 934,024 1,122,911 1,196,956 1,359,271 1,374,729 1,504,697 1,594,106 1,946,440 2,221,997 2,336,177 5.1% Kota Bharu 678,306 759,316 836,060 1,003,162 1,047,755 1,132,345 1,259,205 1,585,238 1,800,836 2,063,747 14.6% Ipoh 64,711 814 5,376 21,937 48,508 71,169 73,354 74,320 98,768 222,606 125.4% Kuala Terengganu 398,252 430,800 487,495 523,619 520,611 502,966 550,831 699,310 842,651 857,239 1.7% Alor Setar 292,549 291,006 307,564 421,314 400,997 407,717 433,644 535,073 660,264 719,029 8.9% Melaka 18,509 27,209 23,751 18,576 21,687 21,322 34,355 21,637 14,178 69,710 391.7% Subang 83,502 95,583 307,747 819,840 1,118,309 1,320,227 1,442,514 1,859,020 2,762,556 3,059,144 10.7% Kuantan 273,005 262,486 259,529 226,912 220,878 248,846 280,074 317,440 314,130 292,109 -7.0% Tioman 57,559 46,260 48,767 49,057 54,056 62,010 60,141 56,054 9,217 0 - Pangkor 9,866 8,906 8,132 7,617 2,588 547 4,068 5,791 205 0 - Redang 28,928 33,738 34,957 28,246 48,610 46,159 35,960 35,982 11,087 0 - Labuan 575,684 535,294 550,859 476,876 505,903 567,928 617,130 738,769 789,494 684,108 -13.3% Lahad Datu 108,697 77,024 99,983 98,558 113,442 131,054 142,733 145,930 161,230 143,654 -10.9% Sandakan 633,194 626,192 618,927 672,469 741,674 788,515 834,626 911,855 900,016 853,411 -5.2% Tawau 660,331 736,646 768,967 866,601 897,848 922,452 982,153 1,202,344 1,218,616 1,203,792 -1.2% Bintulu 449,673 381,158 417,918 487,060 557,459 590,253 661,553 779,774 832,440 800,008 -3.9% Miri 1,559,379 1,454,167 1,537,840 1,620,345 1,694,915 1,856,626 2,018,415 2,223,172 2,363,080 2,249,206 -4.8% Sibu 898,923 809,955 831,772 939,732 1,009,002 1,133,093 1,204,267 1,383,887 1,440,935 1,454,360 0.9% Mulu 48,825 37,463 43,652 49,255 66,575 67,041 49,670 49,432 60,761 51,387 -15.4% Limbang 89,814 50,107 49,181 45,512 50,044 56,211 57,852 61,074 63,870 58,300 -8.7% STOL Sabah 5,933 1,942 3,741 0 793 5,046 5,970 5,174 4,590 5,309 15.7% STOL Sarawak 153,199 134,079 145,807 148,674 170,506 173,289 162,760 156,627 159,300 163,379 2.6% Peninsular Malaysia 30,072,731 32,705,525 34,451,451 37,487,067 43,113,333 47,622,789 50,423,933 60,122,213 63,707,881 64,816,941 1.7% Sabah 5,999,060 6,377,037 6,731,641 6,983,030 7,483,114 8,223,634 8,430,747 9,939,869 9,866,914 9,463,735 -4.1% Sarawak 6,396,165 6,103,397 6,264,784 6,865,210 7,233,018 8,163,235 8,341,040 9,525,002 9,773,208
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Case of Israel's Omission from Airline Route Maps March 22, 2017
    Discriminatory Product Differentiation: The Case of Israel’s Omission from Airline Route Maps March 22, 2017 Joel Waldfogel Frederick R. Kappel Chair in Applied Economics Carlson School of Management & Department of Economics University of Minnesota 3-177 CarlSMgmt 321 19th Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA Tel (612) 626-7128 Fax (612) 626-1335 Email [email protected] Web http://www.tc.umn.edu/~jwaldfog/ & Paul M. Vaaler John and Bruce Mooty Chair in Law & Business Carlson School of Management & Law School University of Minnesota 3-424 CarlSMgmt 321 19th Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA Tel (612) 625-4951 Fax (612) 626-1316 Email [email protected] Web https://www.law.umn.edu/profiles/paul-vaaler Acknowledgments: Paul M. Vaaler (Contact Author). Joel Waldfogel is also an affiliated faculty member at the University of Minnesota Law School. This research benefitted from presentation at seminars sponsored by the University of Minnesota Law School and Humphrey School of Public Affairs, and the University of Florida Levin School of Law. Nicholas Muellerleile provided research assistance. This research benefitted from comments by Brooke Goldstein, Oren Gross, Eugene Kontorovich, Robert Kudrle, Benjamin Ryberg, and D. Daniel Sokol. All errors are the authors’. 0 Discriminatory Product Differentiation: The Case of Israel’s Omission from Airline Route Maps ABSTRACT While product differentiation is generally benign, it can be employed to discriminate against customer groups, either to enhance profitability by appealing to discriminatory customers or in unprofitable ways that indulge owners’ tastes for discrimination. We explore discriminatory product differentiation by international airlines through their depictions of Israel on online route maps and whether their online inflight menus include kosher meal options.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 REVIEW • Ryanair Introduces Direct Flights from Larnaka to Brussels
    2016 REVIEW SPONSORED BY: 1 www.atn.aero 2015 REVIEW • Ryanair introduces direct flights from Larnaka to Brussels JANUARY 4/1/2016 14/1/2016 • Etihad Airways today launched fresh legal action in a bid to overturn a German court’s decision to revoke the approval for 29 of its • Genève Aéroport welcomed a total of nearly 15.8 million passengers codeshare flights with airberlin in 2015 • ALTA welcomes Enrique Cueto as new President of its Executive 5/1/2016 Committee • Spirit Airlines, Inc. today announced Robert L. Fornaro has been appointed President and Chief Executive Officer, effective immediately 6/1/2016 • FAA releases B4UFLY Smartphone App 7/1/2016 • The International Air Transport Association (IATA) announced it is expanding its activities to prevent payment fraud in the air travel industry • Boeing delivered 762 commercial airplanes in 2015, 39 more than the previous year and most ever for the company as it enters its centennial year • Rynair become the first airline to carry over 100m international Source: LATAM customers in one year • American Airlines and LATAM Airlines Group are applying for • BOC Aviation orders 30 A320 Family regulatory approval to enter into a joint business (JB) to better serve their customers • Bordeaux Airport 2015 review: Nearly 5,300,000 passengers in 2015: growth of +7.6% 15/1/2016 • Etihad Airways today welcomed the ruling by the higher administrative 8/1/2016 court in Luneburg reversing an earlier judgment and allowing it to • The European Commission has approved under the EU Merger continue operating
    [Show full text]
  • International Civil Aviation Organization
    INTERNATIONAL CIVIL AVIATION ORGANIZATION REPORT OF THE ELEVENTH MEETING OF THE ASIA PACIFIC REGIONAL AVIATION SAFETY TEAM (APRAST/11) BANGKOK, THAILAND, 20 to 24 NOVEMBER 2017 The views expressed in this Report should be taken as those of the Meeting and not the Organization Approved by the Meeting and published by the ICAO Asia and Pacific Office, Bangkok APRAST/11 2 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Meeting and Registration ............................................................................................................ i 2. Opening Session .................................................................................................................... i Agenda Item 1: Plenary Session – Adoption of Agenda ................................................................ 1 Agenda Item 2: Election of Co-Chair (States) ................................................................................ 1 Agenda Item 3: Workshop on SSP Implementation and SEI Implementation ............................... 1 Agenda Item 4: Update of RASG-APAC/7 Decisions and Work Programme............................... 2 Agenda Item 5: Update, Discuss and Review of Progress of APRAST Activities ........................ 2 Agenda Item 6: Presentations – State / Industry / ICAO ................................................................ 6 Agenda Item 7: Breakout Sessions (SRP-WG, SEI-WG) .............................................................. 8 Agenda Item 8: Any Other Business ...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • APSAR/TF/3 Appendix a to the Report
    APSAR/TF/3 Appendix A to the Report List of Participants Name Title/Organization TEL/FAX/E-MAIL 1. AUSTRALIA (2) 1. Mr. Scott Constable RCC Chief Tel: +61-2-6279 5706 Rescue Coordination Centre - Australia Mob: +61-459 164 627 Emergency Response Division Fax: +61-2-6230 6868 Australian Maritime Safety Authority (AMSA) E-mail: [email protected]; GPO Box 2181 [email protected] Canberra ACT 2601 Australia 2. Mr. Lynn Walton JRCC Chief Tel: +61 2 6279 5706 JRCC Australia Fax: +61 2 6230 6868 Australian Maritime Safety Authority Email: [email protected] GPO Box 2181 Canberra ACT 2601 Australia 2. BANGLADESH (3) 3. Mr. SK.A.K Rafique Ahmed ANS Consultant Tel: +88 2891 4810 - 19 Civil Aviation Authority of Bangladesh Fax: +88 2890 1418 CAAB Headquarter Email: [email protected] Kurmitola Dhaka – 1229 Bangladesh 4. Mr. Ashraful Azhar Flight Operations Inspecter Tel: +88 2891 4810 – 19 ext 3389 Civil Aviation Authority of Bangladesh Fax: +88 2890 1418 CAAB Headquarter Email: [email protected] Kurmitola Dhaka – 1229 Bangladesh A – 1 APSAR/TF/3 Appendix A to the Report Name Title/Organization TEL/FAX/E-MAIL 5. Mr. Mohammed Hafiz Ahmed Airport Manager Tel: +88 01715 018 027 Civil Aviation Authority of Bangladesh Fax: Osmani International Airport, Sylhet Email: [email protected] Bangladesh 3. BRUNEI DARUSSALAM (2) 6. Mr. Wong Chun Heng Operations Officer Tel: +673 223 0142 Regulatory Division Fax: +673 234 5345 Civil Aviation Department E-mail: [email protected] Brunei International Airport, BSB2513 Brunei Dalussalam 7. Mr. Haji Jali Bin Haji Matussin Air Traffic Control Officer Tel: +673 233 0454 Air Traffic Services Fax: +673 234 1157 Civil Aviation Department E-mail: [email protected] Brunei International Airport, BSB2513 Brunei Dalussalam 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Network Planning 2016
    NETWORK PLANNING 2016 IN ASSOCIATION WITH NETWORK PLANNING 2016 2 | FlightGlobal NETWORK PLANNING 2016 CONTENTS Airlines hit new peaks 4 Traffic gains step up in 2015 5 Top 100 airlines by traffic 6 Top 100 airports by traffic 8 Airline start-ups and failures 11 China focus 14 New Chinese intercontinental routes 17 Leading Chinese airports 18 Capacity snapshot – Asia 19 Cover picture by Don Wilson Don Wilson Don The information contained in our databases and used in this presentation has been assembled from many sources, and whilst reasonable care has been taken to ensure accuracy, the information is supplied on the understanding that no legal liability whatsoever shall attach to FlightGlobal, its offices, or employees in respect of any error or omission that may have occurred. © 2016 FlightGlobal, part of Reed Business Information Ltd Wilson Don FlightGlobal | 3 NETWORK PLANNING 2016 AIRLINES HIT NEW PEAKS Airlines and airport network planners arrive in Chengdu for “The demand for travel continues to increase, but at a slower this year’s World Routes with the industry showing distinct pace,” notes IATA director general Tony Tyler. “The fragile and signs of a split personality. uncertain economic backdrop, political shocks and a wave of terrorist attacks are all contributing to a softer demand On the one hand, for the airline sector things have seldom environment.” been better. Industry profits have been on the rise since the lows of the 2008 global financial crisis and recession. North African leisure traffic continues to struggle to recover They reached record highs in 2015 as airline consolidation from the tragic attacks to hit the region last year, while and restructuring efforts were bolstered by the sudden and Europe has been hit by a series of incidents including the welcome fall in fuel costs.
    [Show full text]
  • International Civil Aviation Organization
    INTERNATIONAL CIVIL AVIATION ORGANIZATION REPORT OF THE SIXTH MEETING OF THE ASIA PACIFIC REGIONAL AVIATION SAFETY TEAM (APRAST/6) BANGKOK, THAILAND, 6 to 10 APRIL 2015 The views expressed in this Report should be taken as those of the Meeting and not the Organization Approved by the Meeting and published by the ICAO Asia and Pacific Office, Bangkok APRAST/6 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS Meeting and Registration ......................................................................................................................... i Opening Session .................................................................................................................................. i AGENDA ITEM 1: SMS/SSP Workshops and Breakout Session ........................................................ 1 AGENDA ITEM 2: Plenary Session – Adoption of Agenda ................................................................ 1 AGENDA ITEM 3: RASG-APAC/4 Decisions and Work Programme ................................................ 2 AGENDA ITEM 4: Update, Discussion and Review of APRAST Activities ...................................... 3 AGENDA ITEM 5: Presentations – States/Industry/ICAO .................................................................. 4 AGENDA ITEM 6: Breakout Sessions ................................................................................................. 5 AGENDA ITEM 7: Any Other Business ............................................................................................ 11 AGENDA ITEM 8: Review and Adoption of
    [Show full text]
  • Consumer Report (March 2016 – February 2017)
    MALAYSIAN AVIATION COMMISSION Consumer Report March 2016 to February 2017 April 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Overview Page 1 Executive Chairman’s Foreword 3 2 Complaints Statistics – March 2016 to February 2017 Consumer complaints summary 5 Consumer complaints by airline 6 Consumer complaints by category 7 Consumer complaints by airline and category 8 Consumer complaints by airport and category 9 3 Selected Consumer Initiatives of MAVCOM Introduction of the Malaysian Aviation Consumer Protection Code 2016 11 Establishment of the Complaints Management System 12 Consumer education 13 Assistance to Rayani Air passengers 15 Prohibition on automatically adding on services 16 2 Foreword The Malaysian Aviation Commission (MAVCOM) is pleased to present our inaugural Consumer Report, encompassing the statistics of complaints received between March 2016 and February 2017 and our key initiatives relating to aviation consumers. One of MAVCOM’s principal objectives contained in the Malaysian Aviation Commission Act 2015 Part X under Consumer Protection is to safeguard the rights of consumers in the aviation industry. A survey conducted by MAVCOM in 2016 revealed that 69% of respondents have a misconception of what their rights entail versus what their rights actually are. Many were also under the incorrect assumption that the terms and conditions set by aviation service providers is a representation of their ‘rights’. This emphasises the importance of the Malaysian Aviation Consumer Protection Code 2016 (MACPC), the first in the history of Malaysia’s aviation industry. The MACPC provides for more transparency and clearer guidance on consumer rights and how to exercise these rights relating to flight delays, flight cancellation, mishandled baggage and other flight incidents.
    [Show full text]
  • Table 10.7 : AIR TRANSPORT MOVEMENTS at MALE
    Table 10.7 : AIR TRANSPORT MOVEMENTS AT MALE' INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BY AIRLINE, CROSS0CLASSIFIED BY PASSENGER, CARGO AND MAIL,1987 - 2015 1987 Passengers Cargo (kg) Mail (kg) Airline In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total 144,254 134,639 3,067,489 2,959,761 107,728 48,726 21,215 27,511 International Scheduled 87,018 78,107 2,875,293 2,775,552 99,741 48,266 21,088 27,178 Air lanka 36,602 35,630 1,672,128 1,624,418 47,710 21,670 18,221 3,449 P.I.A 2,496 2,508 64,482 62,614 1,868 590 568 22 Royal Nepal Airlines 81 30 210 210 0 2 2 0 Singapore Airlines 35,282 35,289 327,655 286546 41,109 6,326 1,304 5,022 Emirates 2,955 2,924 324,448 321,647 2,801 25 22 3 Indian Airlines 9,602 1,726 486,370 480,117 6,253 19,653 971 18,682 International Charter 54,358 53,720 185,535 180,679 4,856 0 0 0 Alitalia 6,962 6,995 74,923 74,923 0 0 0 0 Austrian Airline 677 509 0 0 0 0 0 0 Balair 11,545 11,376 5,738 5,738 0 0 0 0 Condor 16,394 16,458 93,867 89,011 4,856 0 0 0 Lauda Air 380 234 0 0 0 0 0 0 L.T.U 16,230 16,715 10,472 10,472 0 0 0 0 Monarch Airlines 193 0 185 185 0 0 0 0 Sterling Airways 1,977 1,433 350 350 0 0 0 0 Other international 789 795 1,910 1,910 0 0 0 0 Domestic 2,089 2,017 4,750 1,619 3,131 460 127 333 Air Maldives 2,089 2,017 4,750 1619 3,131 460 127 333 1988 Total 172,264 171,554 3,822,270 3,651,068 171,202 38,943 21,757 17,186 International Scheduled 101,683 101,133 3,663,225 3,497,582 165,643 38,506 21,657 16,849 Air lanka 41,480 39,934 2,068,394 1,972,638 95,756 20,203 17,677 2,526 Emirates 5,338 5,753 405,963 387,809 18,154 12 5 7 Indian
    [Show full text]
  • Malaysian Accommodation Providers' Understanding of Halal Hospitality
    Malaysian Accommodation Providers‘ Understanding of Halal Hospitality A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Marketing in the University of Canterbury by Nor Hidayatun Abdul Razak University of Canterbury 2018 i ABSTRACT This study investigates the understanding of halal hospitality among accommodation providers in Malaysia. Halal means permissible in Arabic and the concept is a cornerstone of Islam and is used to refer to what is permissible to Muslims. The concept of hospitality adopted in this study is that of describing both the material and the technical nature of the hospitality industry services as well as the relationship between host and guest. This study addresses three research questions related to Malaysian accommodation providers‘ understanding of halal hospitality and their utilization of websites to inform the provision of halal hospitality. First, what is Malaysian accommodation providers‘ understanding of the concept of halal hospitality? Second, what are the social, technical, and commercial means by which accommodation providers provide halal hospitality? Third, how do accommodation providers communicate the social, technical and commercial dimensions of halal hospitality on their websites? Using a qualitative approach, the understanding of halal hospitality was investigated through interviews with 18 accommodation providers from four accommodation categories: hotel, budget hotel, resthouse/guesthouse/homestay/hostel and chalet. The results were analysed thematically. A content analysis of the websites of accommodation providers was used to recognize the halal hospitality attributes displayed to acknowledge halal services to customers. The keywords or terms used to identify the halal hospitality attributes displayed were based on the study conducted by Razzaq, Hall and Prayag (2016) for reasons of comparison.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Full Text In
    The European Proceedings of Social & Behavioural Sciences EpSBS Future Academy ISSN: 2357-1330 https://dx.doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2018.12.03.68 UUMILC 2017 9TH UUM INTERNATIONAL LEGAL CONFERENCE INTERNATIONAL AVIATION SAFETY STANDARD: REDUCING AVIATION RISK IN MALAYSIA THROUGH LEGAL MANDATE Nor Akhmal Hasmin (a) *, Ainul Hafiza Zainudin (b), Rohani Mohd Shah (c), Ahmad Waseem Dhiny Yunus (d) *Corresponding author (a) Faculty of Law, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam, Selangor, [email protected] (b) Faculty of Law, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam, Selangor, [email protected] (c) Faculty of Law, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam, Selangor, [email protected] (d) Faculty of Law, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam, Selangor, [email protected] Abstract Safety management of civil aviation industry should not be taken conscientiously as consequences arising out from aviation crisis is beyond imagination. Recently the numbers of aviation disasters have increased compared to a century ago due to the continued growth of global aviation conduct. A comprehensive regulatory framework on safety management has been established to improve the safety standard of this industry and to minimise the risks of flying. This paper offers a discussion of the concept of statutory factors as part of the essential safety tool in the aviation sector. It is believed that risk factor could be minimised through compliance with safety regulation and safety standard imposed upon regulatory authority. This paper also intend to discuss the current legal position in relation to safety standard adopted by Malaysian aviation authorities. The reference is made to the security regulation under Annex 19 on the Safety Standard of Chicago Convention under the purview of International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) and Operational Safety Audit administered by International Air Transport Association (IATA).
    [Show full text]
  • CHANGE FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION CHG 2 Air Traffic Organization Policy Effective Date: November 8, 2018
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION JO 7340.2H CHANGE FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION CHG 2 Air Traffic Organization Policy Effective Date: November 8, 2018 SUBJ: Contractions 1. Purpose of This Change. This change transmits revised pages to Federal Aviation Administration Order JO 7340.2H, Contractions. 2. Audience. This change applies to all Air Traffic Organization (ATO) personnel and anyone using ATO directives. 3. Where Can I Find This Change? This change is available on the FAA website at http://faa.gov/air_traffic/publications and https://employees.faa.gov/tools_resources/orders_notices. 4. Distribution. This change is available online and will be distributed electronically to all offices that subscribe to receive email notification/access to it through the FAA website at http://faa.gov/air_traffic/publications. 5. Disposition of Transmittal. Retain this transmittal until superseded by a new basic order. 6. Page Control Chart. See the page control chart attachment. Original Signed By: Sharon Kurywchak Sharon Kurywchak Acting Director, Air Traffic Procedures Mission Support Services Air Traffic Organization Date: October 19, 2018 Distribution: Electronic Initiated By: AJV-0 Vice President, Mission Support Services 11/8/18 JO 7340.2H CHG 2 PAGE CONTROL CHART Change 2 REMOVE PAGES DATED INSERT PAGES DATED CAM 1−1 through CAM 1−38............ 7/19/18 CAM 1−1 through CAM 1−18........... 11/8/18 3−1−1 through 3−4−1................... 7/19/18 3−1−1 through 3−4−1.................. 11/8/18 Page Control Chart i 11/8/18 JO 7340.2H CHG 2 CHANGES, ADDITIONS, AND MODIFICATIONS Chapter 3. ICAO AIRCRAFT COMPANY/TELEPHONY/THREE-LETTER DESIGNATOR AND U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Last Year Our Former Marketing Partner, Mega Maldives Korea (“MMK”), Made a Series of Bad Decisions That Harmed Many Passengers and Travel Agents
    H. Sakeena Manzil, Room 5B Tel: +960-3006670 Medhuziyarah Magu Fax: +960-3006671 Malé, Republic of Maldives www.mgcharter.com Dear Customers: Last year our former marketing partner, Mega Maldives Korea (“MMK”), made a series of bad decisions that harmed many passengers and travel agents. We feel you deserve to know how this happened and our plans to try to make things right. MMK is an independent company set up by a Korean businessman to market and promote non-stop flights between Seoul and Maldives on our airline. In their enthusiasm to quickly develop this market they sold seats on proposed MEGA Maldives Airlines flights without securing a contract with us, the airline, to actually operate these flights. While we had good intentions to sign up with MMK to operate these flights, we were unable to match our available capacity with their desired flight schedule and start date. We offered other schedules, which they rejected. We recommended they find another airline to operate the route, with our cooperation, until such time as we could meet their demand. They agreed, but asked us to operate some of the initial flights in their schedule. After detailed study, we found a way to fly the first two round trips, but only these two flights and nothing more. This was made very clear to MMK in advance. MMK arranged several additional flights to Maldives on Korean Air but was unable to develop any other plan to continue operating the flights. On September 29th they stranded approximately 200 passengers in Maldives (who had flown down earlier on an MMK chartered Korean Air flight) with no return trip arrangement confirmed in advance.
    [Show full text]