General Introduction
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Vascular Plant Survey of Vwaza Marsh Wildlife Reserve, Malawi
YIKA-VWAZA TRUST RESEARCH STUDY REPORT N (2017/18) Vascular Plant Survey of Vwaza Marsh Wildlife Reserve, Malawi By Sopani Sichinga ([email protected]) September , 2019 ABSTRACT In 2018 – 19, a survey on vascular plants was conducted in Vwaza Marsh Wildlife Reserve. The reserve is located in the north-western Malawi, covering an area of about 986 km2. Based on this survey, a total of 461 species from 76 families were recorded (i.e. 454 Angiosperms and 7 Pteridophyta). Of the total species recorded, 19 are exotics (of which 4 are reported to be invasive) while 1 species is considered threatened. The most dominant families were Fabaceae (80 species representing 17. 4%), Poaceae (53 species representing 11.5%), Rubiaceae (27 species representing 5.9 %), and Euphorbiaceae (24 species representing 5.2%). The annotated checklist includes scientific names, habit, habitat types and IUCN Red List status and is presented in section 5. i ACKNOLEDGEMENTS First and foremost, let me thank the Nyika–Vwaza Trust (UK) for funding this work. Without their financial support, this work would have not been materialized. The Department of National Parks and Wildlife (DNPW) Malawi through its Regional Office (N) is also thanked for the logistical support and accommodation throughout the entire study. Special thanks are due to my supervisor - Mr. George Zwide Nxumayo for his invaluable guidance. Mr. Thom McShane should also be thanked in a special way for sharing me some information, and sending me some documents about Vwaza which have contributed a lot to the success of this work. I extend my sincere thanks to the Vwaza Research Unit team for their assistance, especially during the field work. -
Guidelines for Using the Checklist
Guidelines for using the checklist Cymbopogon excavatus (Hochst.) Stapf ex Burtt Davy N 9900720 Synonyms: Andropogon excavatus Hochst. 47 Common names: Breëblaarterpentyngras A; Broad-leaved turpentine grass E; Breitblättriges Pfeffergras G; dukwa, heng’ge, kamakama (-si) J Life form: perennial Abundance: uncommon to locally common Habitat: various Distribution: southern Africa Notes: said to smell of turpentine hence common name E2 Uses: used as a thatching grass E3 Cited specimen: Giess 3152 Reference: 37; 47 Botanical Name: The grasses are arranged in alphabetical or- Rukwangali R der according to the currently accepted botanical names. This Shishambyu Sh publication updates the list in Craven (1999). Silozi L Thimbukushu T Status: The following icons indicate the present known status of the grass in Namibia: Life form: This indicates if the plant is generally an annual or G Endemic—occurs only within the political boundaries of perennial and in certain cases whether the plant occurs in water Namibia. as a hydrophyte. = Near endemic—occurs in Namibia and immediate sur- rounding areas in neighbouring countries. Abundance: The frequency of occurrence according to her- N Endemic to southern Africa—occurs more widely within barium holdings of specimens at WIND and PRE is indicated political boundaries of southern Africa. here. 7 Naturalised—not indigenous, but growing naturally. < Cultivated. Habitat: The general environment in which the grasses are % Escapee—a grass that is not indigenous to Namibia and found, is indicated here according to Namibian records. This grows naturally under favourable conditions, but there are should be considered preliminary information because much usually only a few isolated individuals. -
Vegetation Survey of Mount Gorongosa
VEGETATION SURVEY OF MOUNT GORONGOSA Tom Müller, Anthony Mapaura, Bart Wursten, Christopher Chapano, Petra Ballings & Robin Wild 2008 (published 2012) Occasional Publications in Biodiversity No. 23 VEGETATION SURVEY OF MOUNT GORONGOSA Tom Müller, Anthony Mapaura, Bart Wursten, Christopher Chapano, Petra Ballings & Robin Wild 2008 (published 2012) Occasional Publications in Biodiversity No. 23 Biodiversity Foundation for Africa P.O. Box FM730, Famona, Bulawayo, Zimbabwe Vegetation Survey of Mt Gorongosa, page 2 SUMMARY Mount Gorongosa is a large inselberg almost 700 sq. km in extent in central Mozambique. With a vertical relief of between 900 and 1400 m above the surrounding plain, the highest point is at 1863 m. The mountain consists of a Lower Zone (mainly below 1100 m altitude) containing settlements and over which the natural vegetation cover has been strongly modified by people, and an Upper Zone in which much of the natural vegetation is still well preserved. Both zones are very important to the hydrology of surrounding areas. Immediately adjacent to the mountain lies Gorongosa National Park, one of Mozambique's main conservation areas. A key issue in recent years has been whether and how to incorporate the upper parts of Mount Gorongosa above 700 m altitude into the existing National Park, which is primarily lowland. [These areas were eventually incorporated into the National Park in 2010.] In recent years the unique biodiversity and scenic beauty of Mount Gorongosa have come under severe threat from the destruction of natural vegetation. This is particularly acute as regards moist evergreen forest, the loss of which has accelerated to alarming proportions. -
Global Relationships Between Plant Functional Traits and Environment in Grasslands
GLOBAL RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN PLANT FUNCTIONAL TRAITS AND ENVIRONMENT IN GRASSLANDS EMMA JARDINE A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Sheffield Department of Animal and Plant Sciences Submission Date July 2017 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First of all I am enormously thankful to Colin Osborne and Gavin Thomas for giving me the opportunity to undertake the research presented in this thesis. I really appreciate all their invaluable support, guidance and advice. They have helped me to grow in knowledge, skills and confidence and for this I am extremely grateful. I would like to thank the students and post docs in both the Osborne and Christin lab groups for their help, presentations and cake baking. In particular Marjorie Lundgren for teaching me to use the Licor, for insightful discussions and general support. Also Kimberly Simpson for all her firey contributions and Ruth Wade for her moral support and employment. Thanks goes to Dave Simpson, Maria Varontsova and Martin Xanthos for allowing me to work in the herbarium at the Royal Botanic Gardens Kew, for letting me destructively harvest from the specimens and taking me on a worldwide tour of grasses. I would also like to thank Caroline Lehman for her map, her useful comments and advice and also Elisabeth Forrestel and Gareth Hempson for their contributions. I would like to thank Brad Ripley for all of his help and time whilst I was in South Africa. Karmi Du Plessis and her family and Lavinia Perumal for their South African friendliness, warmth and generosity and also Sean Devonport for sharing all the much needed teas and dub. -
Grasses of Namibia Contact
Checklist of grasses in Namibia Esmerialda S. Klaassen & Patricia Craven For any enquiries about the grasses of Namibia contact: National Botanical Research Institute Private Bag 13184 Windhoek Namibia Tel. (264) 61 202 2023 Fax: (264) 61 258153 E-mail: [email protected] Guidelines for using the checklist Cymbopogon excavatus (Hochst.) Stapf ex Burtt Davy N 9900720 Synonyms: Andropogon excavatus Hochst. 47 Common names: Breëblaarterpentyngras A; Broad-leaved turpentine grass E; Breitblättriges Pfeffergras G; dukwa, heng’ge, kamakama (-si) J Life form: perennial Abundance: uncommon to locally common Habitat: various Distribution: southern Africa Notes: said to smell of turpentine hence common name E2 Uses: used as a thatching grass E3 Cited specimen: Giess 3152 Reference: 37; 47 Botanical Name: The grasses are arranged in alphabetical or- Rukwangali R der according to the currently accepted botanical names. This Shishambyu Sh publication updates the list in Craven (1999). Silozi L Thimbukushu T Status: The following icons indicate the present known status of the grass in Namibia: Life form: This indicates if the plant is generally an annual or G Endemic—occurs only within the political boundaries of perennial and in certain cases whether the plant occurs in water Namibia. as a hydrophyte. = Near endemic—occurs in Namibia and immediate sur- rounding areas in neighbouring countries. Abundance: The frequency of occurrence according to her- N Endemic to southern Africa—occurs more widely within barium holdings of specimens at WIND and PRE is indicated political boundaries of southern Africa. here. 7 Naturalised—not indigenous, but growing naturally. < Cultivated. Habitat: The general environment in which the grasses are % Escapee—a grass that is not indigenous to Namibia and found, is indicated here according to Namibian records. -
Plant Names in the Tanzanian Bantu Language Vidunda: Structure and (Some) Etymology Karsten Legère University of Gothenburg
Plant Names in the Tanzanian Bantu Language Vidunda: Structure and (Some) Etymology Karsten Legère University of Gothenburg 1. Background Vidunda (autonym: Chividunda) is a small Bantu language which in Guthrie’s referential classification is identified as G38 (Guthrie 1970). This language was selected for a project which dealt with wild plant names and uses. The research project “Vilda växter i bantuspråk – namn och användning: en lingvistisk, kognitiv, folktaxonomisk och etnobotanisk jämförelse” (Wild plants in Bantu languages – names and uses: a linguistic, cognitive, folktaxonomic and ethnobotanial comparison, co-researcher Christina Thornell) was approved and funded for three years (2003-2005) by the Bank of Sweden Tercentenary Foundation.1 Several reasons triggered the decision to work on Vidunda such as a) Vidunda like many other Tanzanian languages was assumed to be potentially endangered given the estimated below 20,000 speaker number (based on the 1967 population census [Tanzania 1971] and tendencies of ethnic growth and contraction).2 b) Prior to the project Vidunda has not been studied by linguists.3 It is almost totally undocumented.4 c) Together with Bernd Heine the author of this paper had earlier worked on Swahili plant names. It turned out that this focus has much to offer for a linguist with regard to e.g. noun structure, noun classes and distribution, etymology and conceptualization. It was felt that the data for the lingua franca Swahili should be supplemented by material from another Bantu language which is spoken up-country in a remote area, thus expecting a rather low impact of Swahili. In the course of the project work a total of approximately 650 plant names and specimens (for botanical identification) was collected. -
Bioinformatic Challenges for Using Deep Sequencing Data for Diet Analysis of a Threatened Species
Bioinformatic challenges for using deep sequencing data for diet analysis of a threatened species Rachel Gray 2189163G Supervised by Dr Umer Zeeshan Ijaz and Professor Barbara Mable MSc Quantitative Methods in Biodiversity, Conservation and Epidemiology School of Medical and Veterinary Sciences Contents Abstract 5 Acknowledgments 6 1 Background and Aims 7 1.1 Diet analysis as a conservation tool . .7 1.2 Next generation sequencing approaches for diet analysis . .8 1.3 Amplicon Sequence Variants . 10 1.4 Novel approaches to data analysis . 10 1.5 Case Study: Diet Analysis of Puku and Domestic Cattle . 11 1.6 Aims and Objectives . 11 2 Methods 13 2.1 Data description . 13 2.2 Taxonomic Identification Comparison . 14 2.3 Qiime2 bioinformatics pipeline with DADA2 . 15 2.4 Statistical analysis . 16 2.4.1 Diversity Patterns: Alpha Diversity . 16 2.4.2 Diversity Patterns: NRI and NTI . 16 2.4.3 Diversity Patterns: Beta Diversity . 17 2.4.4 Diversity Patterns: Observation of the top-25 most abundant taxa . 18 2.4.5 Identifying the key drivers of diet variation in terms of beta diversity: Subset analysis . 18 2.4.6 Identifying the key drivers of diet variation in terms of beta diversity: DeSeq and Heat tree . 19 2.4.7 Identifying the key drivers of diet variation in terms of beta diversity: investigat- ing core diet between Puku and cattle . 19 2 2.4.8 Null Modelling Approaches: Calculating Quantitative Process Estimate and incidence- based (Raup-Crick) beta-diversity . 19 2.4.9 The Lottery Model . 20 2.4.10 Comparing Transect and Genetic Data . -
Chromosome Numbers in Transvaal Grasses J. M. J. De Wet and L. J. Anderson Divisionof Botany,P
1956 1 Chromosome Numbers in Transvaal Grasses J. M. J. de Wet and L. J. Anderson Divisionof Botany,P. O. Box994 , Pretoria,South Africa Received August 11, 1955 The family Gramineae is very well represented in South Africa , but very little work has been done on their cytology . This investigation represents the third in a series (de Wet 1954 a, b) on the chromosome numbers of South African grasses. Many of the chromosome numbers require little comment and are listed mainly to get them on record . A few are more important and will be discussed in detail . The genera investigated are classified according to Hubbard (1934) and Pilger (1954). This makes it possible to correlate the cytological observations with purely morphological data. Material and methods The majority of the species have been collected in the veld and were identified by Mr. J. A. Anderson of the South African National Herbarium . Seed of Phyllorachis sagitata Trimen were received from the Department of Botany, University of Pretoria. A few species were cultivated on the Prinshof Experimental farm , Division of Botany. Herbarium specimens together with corresponding root tip slides are filed with the Division of Botany at Pretoria. Root tips were fixed in Randolph's (1935) "CRAF" fluid. These were dehydrated, embedded and sectioned in the usual manner. Staining was done according to the method outlined by Stockwell (1934). For a study of leaf anatomy the procedure described by Prat (1948) was followed. Drawings were made with the aid of a camera lucida; the magnifications are indicated. Results The genera studied are listed and the chromosome numbers reported are summarized in table 1. -
Plant Species List for Bezuidenhoutshoek
ANNEXURE 1 PLANT SPECIES LIST FOR BEZUIDENHOUTSHOEK Enviroguard Ecological services cc 89 Spp SCIENTIFIC NAME no Acanthaceaea 28483 Barleria species 5924 Crabbea angustifolia Nees 5930 Crabbea species 6319 Crossandra greenstockii S.Moore 14598 Isoglossa grantii C.B.Clarke 14929 Justicia anagalloides (Nees) T.Anderson 22391 Rhus dentata Thunb. 22472 Rhus gracillima Engl. 22418 Rhus leptodictya Diels 57382 Rhus lucida L. 22425 Rhus magalismontana Sond. ssp. magalismontana 22476 Rhus pyroides Burch. 22471 Rhus zeyheri Sond. Amaranthaceae 178 Achyranthes aspera L. 12213 Gomphrena celosioides Mart. 15182 Kyphocarpa angustifolia (Moq.) Lopr. 21931 Pupalia lappacea (L.) A.Juss. Amaryllidaceae 3394 Boophane disticha (L.f.) Herb. 6281 Crinum graminicola I.Verd. 12458 Haemanthus humilis Jacq. 12442 Haemanthus humilis Jacq. ssp. hirsutus (Baker) Snijman 23648 Scadoxus puniceus (L.) Friis & Nordal Anacardiaceae 15646 Lannea edulis (Sond.) Engl. 19547 Ozoroa paniculosa (Sond.) R.& A.Fern. Anemiaceae 17784 Mohria caffrorum (L.) Desv. Anthericaceae 28468 Anthericum species (now Chlorophytum sp.) 4802 Chlorophytum fasciculatum (Baker) Kativu Apiaceae 4260 Centella asiatica (L.) Urb. Apocynaceae 218 Acokanthera oppositifolia (Lam.) Codd 220 Acokanthera species 644 Ageratum conyzoides L. 1340 Ancylobotrys capensis (Oliv.) Pichon 28474 Asclepias species Enviroguard Ecological services cc 90 7779 Diplorhynchus condylocarpon (Müll.Arg.) Pichon 6448 Ectadiopsis oblongifolia (Meisn.) Benth. ex Schltr. (now Cryptolepis oblongifolia) 12203 Gomphocarpus fruticosus (L.) Aiton f. 13820 Hoodia gordonii (Masson) Sweet ex Decne. 19572 Pachycarpus schinzianus (Schltr.) N.E.Br. 22114 Raphionacme hirsuta (E.Mey.) R.A.Dyer ex E.Phillips 23576 Sarcostemma viminale (L.) R.Br. 24011 Secamone alpini Schult. 28723 Tenaris species Araceae 22655 Richardia brasiliensis Gomes 25759 Stylochiton natalensis Schott Araliaceae 6566 Cussonia paniculata Eckl. -
Plant Census and Floristic Analysis of Selected Serpentine Outcrops of The
South African Journal of Botany 97 (2015) 133–142 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect South African Journal of Botany journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/sajb Plant census and floristic analysis of selected serpentine outcrops of the Barberton Greenstone Belt, Mpumalanga, South Africa S.D. Williamson ⁎, K. Balkwill School of Animal, Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Private Bag 3, Wits 2050, South Africa article info abstract Article history: This paper aims to characterise and describe the species composition of serpentine sites of the Barberton Green- Received 28 March 2014 stone Belt as compared to surrounding non-serpentine areas. A floristic analysis of seven serpentine Received in revised form 19 November 2014 (serpentinite) outcrops of the Barberton Greenstone Belt, in the eastern part of South Africa, recorded 744 species Accepted 3 December 2014 and subspecies, 319 genera and 94 families. 18 taxa remain undescribed. The Barberton Greenstone Belt flora in- Available online 28 January 2015 cludes 32 taxa endemic to serpentine soils and six taxa considered to be hyperaccumulators of nickel. The taxa Edited by OM Grace considered to be endemic to serpentine outcrops make up 39% of the number of endemics found within the Bar- berton Centre of Endemism. The serpentine vegetation is characterised by fewer trees than the surrounding veg- Keywords: etation and the dominance of grass species such as Themeda triandra, Heteropogon contortus and Loudetia simplex. Barberton Greenstone Belt The species composition of each outcrop is relatively unique with only about 30% of species shared between any Important families pair of outcrops. The flora of the serpentine outcrops of the Barberton Greenstone Belt is found to be different to Floristics the surrounding non-serpentine vegetation in terms of number of species per family, the ratios of dicotyledons to Metalliferous outcrops monocotyledons and familial composition. -
C:\My Documents\Sally\Wetlands See CD\Volume II Chaps 1 & 2 Whole
Zambezi Basin Wetlands Volume II : Chapters 1 & 2 - Contents i Back to links page CONTENTS VOLUME II Technical Reviews Page CHAPTER 1 : VEGETATION ........................................... 1 1.1 Introduction .................................................................. 1 1.2 Wetland vegetation and habitats .................................. 2 1.3 East Caprivi, Namibia .................................................. 5 1.4 Barotse Floodplain, Western Zambia ........................... 8 1.5 Zambezi Delta, Mozambique ........................................ 11 1.6 Overall assessment and conclusions ............................. 15 1.7 References .................................................................... 16 FIGURES 1.2-1.5 Vegetation maps ................................. 19 APPENDICES ............................................................... 27 Appendix 1.1: Zambezi Delta - vegetation type descriptions .................................................... 27 CHAPTER 2 : WETLAND PLANTS .................................. 31 2.1 Introduction ................................................................... 31 2.2. Previous work ............................................................... 32 2.3 Wetland habitat types ................................................... 34 2.4 Wetland species ............................................................ 35 2.5 Aquatic weeds .............................................................. 40 2.6 Sites and species of interest .......................................... 41 -
Taxonomic Revision of Ustilago, Sporisorium and Macalpinomyces
Persoonia 29, 2012: 116–132 View metadata,www.ingentaconnect.com/content/nhn/pimj citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk RESEARCH ARTICLE http://dx.doi.org/10.3767/003158512X661462brought to you by CORE provided by Queensland DAF eResearch Archive Taxonomic revision of Ustilago, Sporisorium and Macalpinomyces A.R. McTaggart1,2,3,5, R.G. Shivas1,2, A.D.W. Geering1,2,5, K. Vánky4, T. Scharaschkin1,3 Key words Abstract Morphological characters within the Ustilago-Sporisorium-Macalpinomyces complex are defined explicitly. The genera Sporisorium and Anthracocystis are emended to reflect morphological synapomorphies. smut fungi Three new genera, Langdonia, Stollia and Triodiomyces are described based on soral synapomorphies and host systematics classification. The new classification of the Ustilago-Sporisorium-Macalpinomyces complex incorporates 142 new taxonomy taxonomic combinations. Ustilaginaceae Ustilaginomycotina Article info Received: 18 May 2012; Accepted: 9 October 2012; Published: 17 December 2012. INTRODUCTION genera, Langdonia, Stollia and Triodiomyces are proposed to accommodate newly resolved clades (Fig. 1). The three genera of smut fungi, Ustilago, Sporisorium and Ma- calpinomyces, form a complex that has eluded resolution by Definitions of soral characters in the morphology (Langdon & Fullerton 1975, Vánky 1991, Piepen- Ustilago-Sporisorium-Macalpinomyces complex bring et al. 1998) and molecular phylogenetic analysis (Stoll The interpretation of soral morphology is inconsistent for many et al. 2003, 2005). Two suggestions to reconcile the taxonomy descriptions of smut species. For example, Sporisorium cons- of the complex have been proposed. The first was to break up anguineum, Macalpinomyces spermophorus and M. viridans the current taxa into several smaller genera and subgenera, were described with columellae, but these structures are not and the second to unify the three genera into a single genus, homologous with columellae in Sporisorium s.str.