DOCSLIB.ORG

GRASSES and GRASSLAND ECOLOGY This Page Intentionally Left Blank Grasses and Grassland Ecology

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
GRASSES and GRASSLAND ECOLOGY This Page Intentionally Left Blank Grasses and Grassland Ecology GRASSES AND GRASSLAND ECOLOGY This page intentionally left blank Grasses and Grassland Ecology David J. Gibson Southern Illinois University, Carbondale 1 3 Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide in Oxford New York Auckland Cape Town Dar es Salaam Hong Kong Karachi Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Nairobi New Delhi Shanghai Taipei Toronto With offi ces in Argentina Austria Brazil Chile Czech Republic France Greece Guatemala Hungary Italy Japan Poland Portugal Singapore South Korea Switzerland Thailand Turkey Ukraine Vietnam Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries Published in the United States by Oxford University Press Inc., New York © Oxford University Press 2009 The moral rights of the author have been asserted Database right Oxford University Press (maker) First published 2009 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law, or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organization. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the address above You must not circulate this book in any other binding or cover and you must impose the same condition on any acquirer British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Data available Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Data available Typeset by Newgen Imaging Systems (P) Ltd., Chennai, India Printed in Great Britain on acid-free paper by CPI Antony Rowe, Chippenham, Wiltshire ISBN 978–0–19–852918–7 978–0–19–852919–4 (Pbk) 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Preface . a vast expanse of level ground unbroken save by one My own experience in grasslands results from thin line of trees which scarcely amounted to a scratch an early and abiding love of the chalk grasslands upon the great blank; until it met the glowing sky of southern England. The dune grasslands of wherein it seemed to dip . There it lay, a tranquil sea Newborough Warren, Anglesey and the montane or lake without water . with the day going down upon grasslands of Snowdonia, Wales have also been it . it was lovely and wild, but oppressive in its barren important to me ever since my days as a doctoral monotony. student at the University College of North Wales Charles Dickens (American Notes for General Circulation, (now the University of Bangor). My research in 1842) describing Looking Glass Prairie grasslands has been inspired by many mentors and near Lebanon, Illinois colleagues, but I must mention in particular Paul Risser (formerly of the University of Oklahoma), Grasslands evoke emotion, they are the largest the late Lloyd Hulbert (Kansas State University), biome on Earth, they represent a tremendous source and the Long Term Ecological Research group at of biodiversity, they provide important goods and Konza Prairie during the late 1980s as having a services, and they are the place where as a species, large and enduring influence on my understand- we first stood up and walked. As a result, grasses ing of the North American prairie. The writing of and grasslands are widely studied. However, after this book follows from the start that they gave me. teaching an upper level/postgraduate course on It takes a long time to write a book, but I am grassland ecology for several years, I realized that a grateful to Southern Illinois University Carbondale suitable textbook was needed. Hence, I have written for providing a sabbatical leave in Spring 2006 this book in the hope that it will be useful not just that allowed time to write several chapters. Many, for the students taking my grassland course, but many people helped me write this book. In par- researchers, land managers, and anyone who has ticular, I thank colleagues who answered my an interest in grasslands anywhere in the world. questions and read drafts of various chapters The book brings together a huge literature from including Roger Anderson (Chapter 10), Elizabeth ecological, natural history, and agricultural disci- Bach (Chapter 1), Sara Baer (Chapters 7 and 10), plines. The nomenclature for plant names is syno- Ray Callaway (Chapter 6), Ryan Campbell (Index), nymized according to the USDA Plants National Gregg Cheplick (Chapter 5), Keith Clay (Chapter Database (http://plants.usda.gov/index.html) as 5), Jim Detling (Chapter 9), Stephen Ebbs (Chapter of May 2008, or, for species not in the database, 4), Don Faber-Langendoen (Chapter 8), Richard the name used in the original source. As a result, Groves (Chapter 8), Trevor Hodkinson (Chapter 2), names are changed from the original source when a Allison Lambert (Chapters 1, 2, 3, 4, and 8), Susana more up-to-date name is provided in the database. Perelman (Chapter 8), Wayne Polley (Chapter 4), Some familiar plants have new names: for exam- David Pyke (Chapter 10), Steve Renvoize (Chapter ple, where I talk about tall fescue I use Schedonorus 3), Paul Risser (Chapter 1), Tim Seastedt (Chapter 7), phoenix in place of the older Festuca arundinacea. Rob Soreng (Chapter 2), and Dale Vitt (Chapter 8). Older names are included in the index with a ref- Thanks to Daniel Nickrent, Hongyan Liu, Gervasio erence to the new name. Piñeiro, Sam NcNaughton, Dale Vitt, Steve Wilson, v vi PREFACE and Zicheng Yu for allowing me to reproduce their tirelessly helpful in ensuring that this book was excellent photographs. John Briggs kindly supplied actually published. Finally, grateful thanks to my the satellite image for Plate 13 and Howard Epstein wife Lisa and our children Lacey and Dylan for an original for Fig 4.3. Cheryl Broadie and Steve providing the love and emotional support neces- Mueller of the SIUC IMAGE facility were a tremen- sary for the marathon of writing a book. dous help in preparing several of the photographs Carbondale, Illinois D.J.G and figures. Helen Eaton, Ian Sherman, and the May 2008 staff at Oxford University Press have always been Contents Preface v 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Grasslands: a tautological problem of defi nition 1 1.2 Extent of the world’s grasslands 2 1.3 Grassland loss 4 1.4 Grassland goods and services 12 1.5 Early grassland ecologists 18 2 Systematics and evolution 21 2.1 Characteristics of the Poaceae 21 2.2 Traditional vs modern views of grass classifi cation 22 2.3 Subfamily characteristics 24 2.4 Fossil history and evolution 29 3 Ecological morphology and anatomy 35 3.1 Developmental morphology—the phytomer 35 3.2 Structure of the common oat Avena sativa 36 3.3 Culms 36 3.4 Leaves 43 3.5 Roots 46 3.6 Infl orescence and the spikelet 49 3.7 The grass seed and seedling development 51 3.8 Anatomy 54 4 Physiology 58 4.1 C3 and C4 photosynthesis 58 4.2 Forage quality 68 4.3 Secondary compounds: anti-herbivore defences and allelochemicals 73 4.4 Silicon 78 4.5 Physiological integration of clonal grasses and mechanisms of ramet regulation 79 5 Population ecology 81 5.1 Reproduction and population dynamics 81 5.2 Fungal relationships 94 5.3 Genecology 102 vii viii CONTENTS 6 Community ecology 110 6.1 Vegetation–environment relationships 110 6.2 Succession 113 6.3 Species interactions 115 6.4 Models of grassland community structure 121 6.5 Summary: an issue of scale 128 7 Ecosystem ecology 129 7.1 Energy and productivity 129 7.2 Nutrient cycling 141 7.3 Decomposition 149 7.4 Grassland soils 153 8 World grasslands 160 8.1 Ways of describing vegetation 160 8.2 General description of world grasslands 162 8.3 Examples of regional grassland classifi cations 179 9 Disturbance 184 9.1 The concept of disturbance 185 9.2 Fire 187 9.3 Herbivory 194 9.4 Drought 207 10 Management and restoration 211 10.1 Management techniques and goals 211 10.2 Range assessment 221 10.3 Restoration 235 References 243 Plant index 289 Animal index 297 Subject index 299 CHAPTER 1 Introduction Each grass-covered hillside is an open book for those The main points that these varied definitions have who care to read. Upon its pages are written the condi- in common are the prevalence of grasses (members tions of the present, the events of the past, and a forecast of the Poaceae), an infrequent or a low abundance of those of the future. Some see without understand- of woody vegetation, and a generally arid climate. ing; but let us look closely and understandingly, and act Risser’s (1988) definition is perhaps the most com- wisely, and in time bring our methods of land use and prehensive as it encompasses these ideas. Other conservation activities into close harmony with the dic- factors that are important and which together help tates of Nature. characterize natural grasslands in many parts of John E. Weaver (1954) the world include deep, fertile, organic-rich soils (frequently Chernozems—see Chapter 7), frequent The purpose of this first chapter is to introduce the natural fire (Chapter 9), and large herds of graz- grassland biome. Grasslands are the most extensive, ing mammals (Chapter 9). Semi-natural or seeded arguably the most useful to human society, yet the grasslands (e.g. amenity grasslands: Chapter 8) most threatened biome on the planet. Nevertheless, may lack some of these features, especially natural it is surprisingly difficult to unambiguously define disturbance.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Plant Press
    Special Symposium Issue continues on page 14 Department of Botany & the U.S. National Herbarium The Plant Press New Series - Vol. 20 - No. 3 July-September 2017 Botany Profile Plant Expeditions: History Has Its Eyes On You By Gary A. Krupnick he 15th Smithsonian Botani- as specimens (living or dried) in centuries field explorers to continue what they are cal Symposium was held at the past. doing. National Museum of Natural The symposium began with Laurence T he morning session began with a History (NMNH) and the U.S. Botanic Dorr (Chair of Botany, NMNH) giv- th Garden (USBG) on May 19, 2017. The ing opening remarks. Since the lectures series of talks focusing on the 18 symposium, titled “Exploring the Natural were taking place in Baird Auditorium, Tcentury explorations of Canada World: Plants, People and Places,” Dorr took the opportunity to talk about and the United States. Jacques Cayouette focused on the history of plant expedi- the theater’s namesake, Spencer Baird. A (Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada) tions. Over 200 participants gathered to naturalist, ornithologist, ichthyologist, and presented the first talk, “Moravian Mis- hear stories dedicated col- sionaries as Pioneers of Botanical Explo- and learn about lector, Baird was ration in Labrador (1765-1954).” He what moti- the first curator explained that missionaries of the Mora- vated botanical to be named vian Church, one of the oldest Protestant explorers of at the Smith- denominations, established missions the Western sonian Institu- along coastal Labrador in Canada in the Hemisphere in the 18th, 19th, and 20th tion and eventually served as Secretary late 1700s.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplemental Wildlife Food Planting Manual for the Southeast • Contents
    Supplemental Wildlife Food Planting Manual for the Southeast • Contents Managing Plant Succession ................................ 4 Openings ............................................................. 6 Food Plot Size and Placement ............................ 6 Soil Quality and Fertilization .............................. 6 Preparing Food Plots .......................................... 7 Supplemental Forages ............................................................................................................................. 8 Planting Mixtures/Strip Plantings ......................................................................................................... 9 Legume Seed Inoculation ...................................................................................................................... 9 White-Tailed Deer ............................................................................................................................... 10 Eastern Wild Turkey ............................................................................................................................ 11 Northern Bobwhite .............................................................................................................................. 12 Mourning Dove ................................................................................................................................... 13 Waterfowl ............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Genomespecific Introgression Between Wheat and Its Wild Relative
    doi: 10.1111/jeb.12040 SHORT COMMUNICATION Genome-specific introgression between wheat and its wild relative Aegilops triuncialis C. PARISOD*, C. DEFINOD*, A. SARR*, N. ARRIGO*† &F.FELBER*1 *Laboratory of Evolutionary Botany, Institute of Biology, University of Neuchaˆtel, Neuchaˆtel, Switzerland †Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA Keywords: Abstract barbed goatgrass; Introgression of sequences from crop species in wild relatives is of funda- containment strategy; mental and practical concern. Here, we address gene flow between culti- crop-to-wild gene flow; vated wheat and its widespread polyploid relative, Aegilops triuncialis, using genetically modified wheat; 12 EST-SSR markers mapped on wheat chromosomes. The presence of genome-specific introgression; wheat diagnostic alleles in natural populations of the barbed goatgrass hybridization; growing in proximity to cultivated fields highlights that substantial gene mapped EST-SSR; flow occurred when both species coexisted. Furthermore, loci from the A transgene escape. subgenome of wheat were significantly less introgressed than sequences from other subgenomes, indicating differential introgression into Ae. triun- cialis. Gene flow between such species sharing nonhomeologous chromo- somes addresses the evolutionary outcomes of hybridization and may be important for efficient gene containment. have been reported in European agro-ecosystems Introduction (Felber et al., 2007). With the advent of genetically Reproduction between genetically distinct taxa, pro- modified crops, the consequences of introgression on ducing offspring of mixed ancestry (i.e. hybridization), local biota are receiving growing attention (Chapman plays a crucial role in evolution (Arnold, 2006). & Burke, 2006; Kwit et al., 2011). However, interspecific gene flow has been generally The Triticum/Aegilops species complex represents an overlooked, and the factors determining the outcome outstanding model to evaluate crop-to-wild gene flow.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Weeds of Coastal Plains and Heathy Forests Bioregions of Victoria Heading in Band
    Advisory list of environmental weeds of coastal plains and heathy forests bioregions of Victoria Heading in band b Advisory list of environmental weeds of coastal plains and heathy forests bioregions of Victoria Heading in band Advisory list of environmental weeds of coastal plains and heathy forests bioregions of Victoria Contents Introduction 1 Purpose of the list 1 Limitations 1 Relationship to statutory lists 1 Composition of the list and assessment of taxa 2 Categories of environmental weeds 5 Arrangement of the list 5 Column 1: Botanical Name 5 Column 2: Common Name 5 Column 3: Ranking Score 5 Column 4: Listed in the CALP Act 1994 5 Column 5: Victorian Alert Weed 5 Column 6: National Alert Weed 5 Column 7: Weed of National Significance 5 Statistics 5 Further information & feedback 6 Your involvement 6 Links 6 Weed identification texts 6 Citation 6 Acknowledgments 6 Bibliography 6 Census reference 6 Appendix 1 Environmental weeds of coastal plains and heathy forests bioregions of Victoria listed alphabetically within risk categories. 7 Appendix 2 Environmental weeds of coastal plains and heathy forests bioregions of Victoria listed by botanical name. 19 Appendix 3 Environmental weeds of coastal plains and heathy forests bioregions of Victoria listed by common name. 31 Advisory list of environmental weeds of coastal plains and heathy forests bioregions of Victoria i Published by the Victorian Government Department of Sustainability and Environment Melbourne, March2008 © The State of Victoria Department of Sustainability and Environment 2009 This publication is copyright. No part may be reproduced by any process except in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Adaptation of Forages in Lao PDR
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE THIRD REGIONAL MEETING OF THE FSP Environmental adaptation of forages in Lao PDR Phonepaseuth Phengsavanh1 and Viengsavanh Phimphachanhvongsod2 In Lao PDR, livestock production is almost totally a smallholder farming practice and is a vital component of livelihood security. Animals generally graze on native forages (grasses, shrubs, legumes, and tree leaves) that are available in forests and grasslands. However, native grass is abundant only during the wet season. Dry season feed shortages are common, resulting in severe animal feeding problems for farmers throughout the country. There are currently few, if any, alternative feed sources. For many years, some Hmong farmers, who live on the fertile highland soils in Luang Phabang and Xieng Khouang, have fed grazing animals Napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum) as a supplement. Some farmers in Xieng Khouang have recently started to use Ruzi grass (Brachiaria ruziziensis) for the same purpose. However, in general, very few farmers in Lao PDR plant forages. This does not mean that there is no demand. The severity of feed resource limitations in some provinces (especially Luang Phabang and Xieng Khouang) is creating a huge interest in planted forages among farmers. To meet this demand, the Department of Livestock and Fisheries, in collaboration with the Forages for Smallholders Project, established forage nurseries at five different agro-ecological sites in four provinces to evaluate forage adaptation for subsequent on- farm testing at Namsuang (Vientiane municipality), Houakhoth and Houaphai (Luang Phabang), Ban Km 32 (Oudomxay), and Khinak (Champassak). Site descriptions The soil pH (1:5 water) at these sites varied from very acid to neutral (Table 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Insects of Macquarie Island. Introduction1
    Pacific Insects 4 (4) : 905-915 December, 15, 1962 INSECTS OF MACQUARIE ISLAND. INTRODUCTION1 By J. Linsley Gressitt BISHOP MUSEUM, HONOLULU Abstract: Collections of land arthropods were made on Macquarie Island by J. L. Gres­ sitt and J. H. Calaby, 4-10 December 1960, and by Keith Watson, December 1960-Decem- ber 1961. This paper is a brief discussion of the geography and environment of Macquarie, introductory to the systematic papers describing the fauna. Watson, of the Australian Na­ tional Antarctic Research Expeditions, will later publish his general ecological studies, when the species are all identified. INTRODUCTION This paper is a brief description of the geography and environment of Macquarie Is­ land, as related to land arthropods. It is presented by way of introduction to the series of reports by various specialists on the land arthropod fauna of the island. The bulk of these reports immediately follow this article. (One Macquarie mite is discussed in the third of the preceding articles by Wallwork on Antarctic mites, and another is mentioned in his second article.) Others will appear in later issues, when they are completed. After publication of the bulk of these taxonomic reports, Keith Watson will publish his general report on the land arthropod fauna of Macquarie, incorporating his ecological studies on the fauna. Through the kindness of Mr. P. G. Law, Director of the Antarctic Division, Australian Department of External Affairs, I was permitted to join the Australian National Antarctic Research Expedition for the annual resupply trip to Macquarie Island in early December 1960. The operation, supported by the chartered Danish ice-breaker Magga Dan, was car­ ried on at Macquarie from 4th to lOth December.
    [Show full text]
  • Gopher–Plant–Fungal Interactions Affect
    Ecology, 84(1), 2003, pp. 120±128 q 2003 by the Ecological Society of America GOPHER±PLANT±FUNGAL INTERACTIONS AFFECT ESTABLISHMENT OF AN INVASIVE GRASS VALERIE T. E VINER1,3 AND F. S TUART CHAPIN, III2 1Department of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720 USA 2Institute of Arctic Biology, University of Alaska, Fairbanks, Alaska 99775 USA Abstract. Many attempts have been made to link invasions of exotic plants to speci®c plant traits and key attributes of invaded ecosystems. While these factors play a role in determining the potential for invasion, they are often inadequate in predicting the success of a speci®c invasion. We show that interactions of an invasive grass with other members of the community determine the local pattern of invasion. A fungus, Ulocladium atrum, aids the establishment of barbed goatgrass (Aegilops triuncialis) by weakening the grass's tough seed head, thereby accelerating germination and seedling establishment. In contrast, gophers, Thomomys bottae, decrease establishment of this invader by selectively burying patches of goatgrass seedlings under mounds. Plants that survive these gopher disturbances produce seeds that are uninfected by Ulocladium atrum, which may further decrease the establishment of the next generation of goatgrass. A ®eld survey indicated that goatgrass achieves dominance in areas with minimal gopher disturbance, but has limited establishment in pastures with high gopher activity, indicating that the landscape pattern of gopher activity in¯uences patterns of goatgrass invasion by manipulating gopher±plant±fungal interactions. Key words: Aegilops triuncialis; California (USA) annual grasslands; disturbance; fungus; ger- mination; goatgrass; plant invasion; pocket gophers; species interactions, role in plant invasion; Thomomys bottae; Ulocladium atrum.
    [Show full text]
  • Introductory Grass Identification Workshop University of Houston Coastal Center 23 September 2017
    Broadleaf Woodoats (Chasmanthium latifolia) Introductory Grass Identification Workshop University of Houston Coastal Center 23 September 2017 1 Introduction This 5 hour workshop is an introduction to the identification of grasses using hands- on dissection of diverse species found within the Texas middle Gulf Coast region (although most have a distribution well into the state and beyond). By the allotted time period the student should have acquired enough knowledge to identify most grass species in Texas to at least the genus level. For the sake of brevity grass physiology and reproduction will not be discussed. Materials provided: Dried specimens of grass species for each student to dissect Jewelry loupe 30x pocket glass magnifier Battery-powered, flexible USB light Dissecting tweezer and needle Rigid white paper background Handout: - Grass Plant Morphology - Types of Grass Inflorescences - Taxonomic description and habitat of each dissected species. - Key to all grass species of Texas - References - Glossary Itinerary (subject to change) 0900: Introduction and house keeping 0905: Structure of the course 0910: Identification and use of grass dissection tools 0915- 1145: Basic structure of the grass Identification terms Dissection of grass samples 1145 – 1230: Lunch 1230 - 1345: Field trip of area and collection by each student of one fresh grass species to identify back in the classroom. 1345 - 1400: Conclusion and discussion 2 Grass Structure spikelet pedicel inflorescence rachis culm collar internode ------ leaf blade leaf sheath node crown fibrous roots 3 Grass shoot. The above ground structure of the grass. Root. The below ground portion of the main axis of the grass, without leaves, nodes or internodes, and absorbing water and nutrients from the soil.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of the Vascular Plants of Redwood National Park
    Humboldt State University Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University Botanical Studies Open Educational Resources and Data 9-17-2018 Checklist of the Vascular Plants of Redwood National Park James P. Smith Jr Humboldt State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps Part of the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Smith, James P. Jr, "Checklist of the Vascular Plants of Redwood National Park" (2018). Botanical Studies. 85. https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps/85 This Flora of Northwest California-Checklists of Local Sites is brought to you for free and open access by the Open Educational Resources and Data at Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Botanical Studies by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A CHECKLIST OF THE VASCULAR PLANTS OF THE REDWOOD NATIONAL & STATE PARKS James P. Smith, Jr. Professor Emeritus of Botany Department of Biological Sciences Humboldt State Univerity Arcata, California 14 September 2018 The Redwood National and State Parks are located in Del Norte and Humboldt counties in coastal northwestern California. The national park was F E R N S established in 1968. In 1994, a cooperative agreement with the California Department of Parks and Recreation added Del Norte Coast, Prairie Creek, Athyriaceae – Lady Fern Family and Jedediah Smith Redwoods state parks to form a single administrative Athyrium filix-femina var. cyclosporum • northwestern lady fern unit. Together they comprise about 133,000 acres (540 km2), including 37 miles of coast line. Almost half of the remaining old growth redwood forests Blechnaceae – Deer Fern Family are protected in these four parks.
    [Show full text]
  • 150 Years of Research at the United States Department of Agriculture
    United States Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service 150 Years of Research at June 2013 the United States Department of Agriculture: Plant Introduction and Breeding I Cover photo: The stately building that once housed the U.S. Department of Agriculture in Washington, D.C., ca. 1890. (This photo is preserved in the USDA History Collection, Special Collections, National Agricultural Library.) II United States Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service 150 Years of Research at June 2013 the United States Department of Agriculture: Plant Introduction and Breeding R.J. Griesbach Griesbach is Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Technology Transfer, USDA, Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, MD. i Abstract Griesbach, R.J. 2013. 150 Years of Research at the While supplies last, single copies of this publication United States Department of Agriculture: can be obtained at no cost from Robert J. Griesbach, Plant Introduction and Breeding. U.S. Department USDA-ARS, Office of Technology Transfer, 5601 of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Sunnyside Avenue, Room 4-1159, Beltsville, MD Washington, DC. 20705; or by email at [email protected]. The U.S. Department of Agriculture celebrated its Copies of this publication may be purchased in various 150th anniversary in 2012. One of the primary formats (microfiche, photocopy, CD, print on demand) functions of the USDA when it was established in 1862 from the National Technical Information Service, 5285 was “to procure, propagate, and distribute among the people new Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22161, (800) 553- and valuable seeds and plants.” The U.S. Government first 6847, www.ntis.gov. became involved in new plant introductions in 1825 when President John Quincy Adams directed U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Jepson Manual: Vascular Plants of California, Second Edition Supplement II December 2014
    The Jepson Manual: Vascular Plants of California, Second Edition Supplement II December 2014 In the pages that follow are treatments that have been revised since the publication of the Jepson eFlora, Revision 1 (July 2013). The information in these revisions is intended to supersede that in the second edition of The Jepson Manual (2012). The revised treatments, as well as errata and other small changes not noted here, are included in the Jepson eFlora (http://ucjeps.berkeley.edu/IJM.html). For a list of errata and small changes in treatments that are not included here, please see: http://ucjeps.berkeley.edu/JM12_errata.html Citation for the entire Jepson eFlora: Jepson Flora Project (eds.) [year] Jepson eFlora, http://ucjeps.berkeley.edu/IJM.html [accessed on month, day, year] Citation for an individual treatment in this supplement: [Author of taxon treatment] 2014. [Taxon name], Revision 2, in Jepson Flora Project (eds.) Jepson eFlora, [URL for treatment]. Accessed on [month, day, year]. Copyright © 2014 Regents of the University of California Supplement II, Page 1 Summary of changes made in Revision 2 of the Jepson eFlora, December 2014 PTERIDACEAE *Pteridaceae key to genera: All of the CA members of Cheilanthes transferred to Myriopteris *Cheilanthes: Cheilanthes clevelandii D. C. Eaton changed to Myriopteris clevelandii (D. C. Eaton) Grusz & Windham, as native Cheilanthes cooperae D. C. Eaton changed to Myriopteris cooperae (D. C. Eaton) Grusz & Windham, as native Cheilanthes covillei Maxon changed to Myriopteris covillei (Maxon) Á. Löve & D. Löve, as native Cheilanthes feei T. Moore changed to Myriopteris gracilis Fée, as native Cheilanthes gracillima D.
    [Show full text]
  • Agrostis Stolonifera L.
    Theor Appl Genet (2005) 111: 795–803 DOI 10.1007/s00122-005-2065-x ORIGINAL PAPER N. Chakraborty Æ J. Bae Æ S. Warnke T. Chang Æ G. Jung Linkage map construction in allotetraploid creeping bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera L.) Received: 3 December 2004 / Accepted: 2 May 2005 / Published online: 25 June 2005 Ó Springer-Verlag 2005 Abstract Creeping bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera L.) is Introduction one of the most adapted bentgrass species for use on golf course fairways and putting greens because of its high Agrostis, or bentgrass, is a large genus of over 200 species tolerance to low mowing height. It is a highly out- in the Poaceae family (Hitchcock 1951). Only five species crossing allotetraploid species (2n=4x=28, A and A 2 3 are used as turfgrass in the United States: colonial subgenomes). The first linkage map in this species is (Agrostis capillaris L.), velvet (Agrostis canina L.), dry- reported herein, and it was constructed based on a land (Agrostis castellana Boiss. and Reut.), redtop (Ag- population derived from a cross between two heterozy- rostis gigantea Roth) and creeping (Agrostis stolonifera gous clones using 169 RAPD, 180 AFLP, and 39 het- L.). These species are perennial, outcrossing cool-season erologous cereal and 36 homologous bentgrass cDNA grasses used for lawns, athletic fields, and golf courses. RFLP markers. The linkage map consists of 424 map- Currently, the stoloniferous, allotetraploid creeping ped loci covering 1,110 cM in 14 linkage groups, of bentgrass (2n=4x=28, A and A subgenomes) is the which seven pairs of homoeologous chromosomes were 2 3 most adapted species for use on golf course fairways and identified based on duplicated loci.
    [Show full text]