DOCSLIB.ORG

Science Capability Audit – Water

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Science Capability Audit – Water Science Capability Audit - Water Final Report, July 2014 This review audit and strategic analysis of water related applied Biography of Paul Greenfield, Lead Author science and research within the Queensland Government has been undertaken as part of the Government’s examination of its science Paul Greenfield AO is the current Chairman of the Australian capability and investment, following the state election in March 2012. Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation (ANSTO) and Chair of the International Water Centre - a joint venture The Queensland Government is committed to using science and between The University of Queensland (UQ) and Griffith innovation for economic success by ensuring it has access to the best University, and the International Energy Centre - a joint possible scientific advice, that this is directed toward meeting the venture between three universities and a major resource future policy challenges of Queensland industries, and contributes to company. sound decision-making about environmental, economic, industry and social issues. He has a Bachelor of Engineering and a PhD in chemical engineering from UNSW and Bachelor of Economics from This is the first thematic audit of the Queensland Government’s UQ. Throughout his career, he has worked in the private scientific capability and investment oversighted by the Office of the sector, with the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Queensland Chief Scientist. Research Organisation (CSIRO) and at universities in Australia and the USA. From 1975 until the end of 2011, he © Office of the Queensland Chief Scientist (OQCS), 2014. worked at UQ, initially as an academic and finally as Vice Acknowledgements Chancellor and President. His research interests have been in Photos courtesy of: Tropwater; DepositPhotos; Wikimedia; Sunwater; SEQ Water; environmental and energy management, wastewater CSIRO management, biotechnology and technology innovation. Data supplied by: • Queensland Departments of: Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry; Energy and As well as maintaining an active consulting activity throughout Water Supply; Environment and Heritage Protection; Natural Resources and his career, he has been involved in establishing a number of Mines; Queensland Health; and Science, Information Technology, Innovation and the Arts commercial enterprises aimed at taking early stage intellectual • Queensland universities: Central Queensland University; Griffith University; James capital to the market. Current activities involve working with Cook University; Queensland University of Technology; The University of industry and government to address water-related issues Queensland; University of the Sunshine Coast; and University of Southern associated with coal seam gas as well as exploring the Queensland • The Bureau of Meteorology increasing connections between energy and water • Water utilities: Sunwater; SEQ Water; Unity Water; Health Waterways management, particularly in the urban setting. • Research: Urban Water Security Research Alliance; CSIRO; Natural Environmental Research Program; National Centre for Groundwater Research; He holds board positions with Healthy Waterways Ltd and the Australian Water Recycling Centre of Excellence Great Barrier Reef Foundation Ltd referred to in this review. • Gold Coast City Council Co-authored by: Jenny Riches, Office of the Queensland Chief Scientist Interim Report | Water Science Capability Audit 2 Contents Executive Summary 4 Conclusions 8 Recommendations 9 Introduction 10 Why do governments invest in science and R&D? Terms of Reference 11 Audit Process 12 Key Findings by Terms of Reference (ToR) - ToR 1 Scope and content of the current program 13 - ToR 2 Alignment of current program 20 - ToR 3 Strengths, gaps, overlaps & conflicts 21 - ToR 4 Key clients and stakeholders 22 - ToR 5 Resources and capability 23 - ToR 6 Advantages and disadvantages of current delivery approaches 26 - ToR 7 & 8 Alternative models and benefits/costs and risks 27 Appendix 1 31 Consultation List Appendix 2 33 Three Alternative Models Interim Report | Water Science Capability Audit 3 Executive Summary • The Chief Scientist is oversighting a series of audits/reviews looking at • Meetings were held with all five sponsoring departments and with the applied science and research and development (R&D) undertaken the Departments of State Development, Infrastructure and Planning or commissioned by the Queensland Government. This audit focused (DSDIP), Premier and Cabinet (DPC), Health, and National Parks, on the Queensland Government investment, capability and delivery in Recreation, Sport and Racing (DNPRSR). water-related science and R&D. • Data was gathered from the five sponsoring departments on • The audit had two broad objectives – to provide an evidence base expenditure in water-related applied science and R&D at program in arguing for future investment and policy directions, and to assess (not project) level for the past five years (when available) the effectiveness of current and alternative delivery mechanisms. categorised against an established Council of Australian Governments (COAG) framework (eight classifications). • The audit was sponsored by the Departments of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry (DAFF), Energy and Water Supply (DEWS), • Information for 2012-13 was also collected from a range of other Environment and Heritage Protection, (DEHP), Natural Resources research, university, utility and government-related agencies, e.g. and Mines (DNRM), and Science, Information Technology, Seqwater; Unity Water; Bureau of Meteorology (BoM); Australian Innovation and the Arts (DSITIA). Water Recycling Centre of Excellence (AWRCoE); CSIRO; Healthy Waterways; and Queensland universities. • It was the first thematic audit, the previous audits being departmentally focussed. Being thematic, the boundaries were less • In 2012-13, the five departments managed funds totalling $37.5 clear-cut than they were for the departmental audits. million to support water related science and R&D activities. Of this, $18.8 million came from their internal funds (i.e. the funds were • The audit included both quantity and quality issues related to water, provided as an allocation by the Queensland Government to the e.g. supply, catchment hydrology, waterways, ports and the inner department and the projects managed – but not necessarily carried Great Barrier Reef but excluded the outer reef, while recognising out - within the respective departments). Inter-departmental transfers there were interactions between terrestrial and marine environments (i.e. the funds were sourced from Queensland Government e.g. mainland run-off and crown-of-thorns (COTS) outbreaks. departments other than that carrying out the project) accounted for $6.5 million (mostly to DSITIA). Another $12.2 million was attracted • Compliance monitoring in itself was not included, but investigative from bodies external to the Queensland Government for water- monitoring was. Likewise, where data was gathered to manage a related science and R&D (mostly to DNRM and DSITIA). system in the short term but gave rise over time to longitudinal datasets which were quality assured, it was considered that this activity generated a science asset(e.g. streamflow or groundwater data, or ecosystem quality data), even though the original objective was management or policy focused. InterimXX Report Report | Water | Water Science Science Capability Capability Audit Audit 4 Executive Summary • Most of the resources were spent within DNRM (45.4%) and DSITIA • Within the five departments, there is very limited investment in longer (44.6%), although the DNRM figure is inflated by $7 million (17.3%) term strategic research on water-related science and technology committed to stream flow gauging and groundwater measurements, issues. This contrasts with the thirty year horizon taken in developing which is required for management rather than scientific purposes, but a water plan for the state (WaterQ). It is not clear how the current which generates data of scientific and future policy value. applied science and research capability within the state informs and will assist the achievement of the water plan goals. • The total spend in Queensland in 2012-13 on water-related science and R&D outside of the Queensland Government (not including the • The dominant feature of the delivery program is the role of DSITIA private sector) exceeded $100 million, i.e. almost three times the Science Delivery Division (SDD) as service provider to the other spend by Government. While the focus of some of this work differs agencies. This model differs from the traditional approach where from departmental priorities, it provides evidence of significant water- relevant science capability is co-located in the same agency as the related science capability existing in Queensland outside of the five related policy, management or regulatory functions. This mode of departments. delivery has both advantages (focus, perceived independence) and challenges (scale, culture, inflexibility, sensitivity to short term • Reliable trend data over time on water-related science and R&D changes in funding). expenditure was difficult to obtain due to recent departmental restructuring. The data that was available, acknowledged reductions • In particular, the delivery model requires the existence of in full time equivalent (FTE) numbers and external commentary all mechanisms for effective translation of applied science and R&D to attested to a drop in capability over the past two years.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Queensland Water Directorate
    supporting ellearning splportunities Queensland Water Directorate Demonstrated progress report Funding - up to AUD$l00,000 Submitted September 2008 to the Industry Integration of E-learning business activity of the national training system's e-learning strategy, the Australian Flexible Learning Framework @ Commonwealth of Australia 2008 For more information about E-learning for Industry: Phone: (02) 6207 3262 Email: [email protected] Website: htt~://industrv.flexiblelearninq.net.au Mail: Canberra Institute of Technology Strategic and National Projects GPO Box 826 Canberra ACT 2601 DET RTI Application 340/5/1797 - File A - Document No. 566 of 991 TAFE Queensland - - * Queensland Government Industry integration of e-learning September 08 Progress Report qldwaterand TAFE Queensland 1. Business - provider partnerships numbers and growth In the past business - provider partnerships for trainiug in the water sector have been adhocand there has been little national coordination. Moreover, at the start of this project there were or~lytwo examples of a business - provider partnership for e-learning in the water industry in Australia. These were: a relationship between Wide Bay Water and Sunwater for water worker training and a preliminary arrangement between Wide Bay TAFE and Wide Bay Water to provide on-line training services to other Councils. The collaborative model of industry sector long-term funding has already (in the first three months) resulted in an increase in the number of relationships through two mechanisms. These are: new partnerships as a direct result of the project, and negotiation of partnerships with other RTOs through leverage provided by the project. Two new partnerships have arisen as a result of the industry funding.
    [Show full text]
  • Drivers for Decentralised Systems in South East Queensland
    Drivers for Decentralised Systems in South East Queensland Grace Tjandraatmadja, Stephen Cook, Angel Ho, Ashok Sharma and Ted Gardner October 2009 Urban Water Security Research Alliance Technical Report No. 13 Urban Water Security Research Alliance Technical Report ISSN 1836-5566 (Online) Urban Water Security Research Alliance Technical Report ISSN 1836-5558 (Print) The Urban Water Security Research Alliance (UWSRA) is a $50 million partnership over five years between the Queensland Government, CSIRO’s Water for a Healthy Country Flagship, Griffith University and The University of Queensland. The Alliance has been formed to address South-East Queensland's emerging urban water issues with a focus on water security and recycling. The program will bring new research capacity to South-East Queensland tailored to tackling existing and anticipated future issues to inform the implementation of the Water Strategy. For more information about the: UWSRA - visit http://www.urbanwateralliance.org.au/ Queensland Government - visit http://www.qld.gov.au/ Water for a Healthy Country Flagship - visit www.csiro.au/org/HealthyCountry.html The University of Queensland - visit http://www.uq.edu.au/ Griffith University - visit http://www.griffith.edu.au/ Enquiries should be addressed to: The Urban Water Security Research Alliance PO Box 15087 CITY EAST QLD 4002 Ph: 07-3247 3005; Fax: 07-3405 3556 Email: [email protected] Ashok Sharma - Project Leader Decentralised Systems CSIRO Land and Water 37 Graham Road HIGHETT VIC 3190 Ph: 03-9252 6151 Email: [email protected] Citation: Grace Tjandraatmadja, Stephen Cook, Angel Ho, Ashok Sharma and Ted Gardner (2009). Drivers for Decentralised Systems in South East Queensland.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Recycling in Australia (Report)
    WATER RECYCLING IN AUSTRALIA A review undertaken by the Australian Academy of Technological Sciences and Engineering 2004 Water Recycling in Australia © Australian Academy of Technological Sciences and Engineering ISBN 1875618 80 5. This work is copyright. Apart from any use permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission from the publisher. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction rights should be directed to the publisher. Publisher: Australian Academy of Technological Sciences and Engineering Ian McLennan House 197 Royal Parade, Parkville, Victoria 3052 (PO Box 355, Parkville Victoria 3052) ph: +61 3 9347 0622 fax: +61 3 9347 8237 www.atse.org.au This report is also available as a PDF document on the website of ATSE, www.atse.org.au Authorship: The Study Director and author of this report was Dr John C Radcliffe AM FTSE Production: BPA Print Group, 11 Evans Street Burwood, Victoria 3125 Cover: - Integrated water cycle management of water in the home, encompassing reticulated drinking water from local catchment, harvested rainwater from the roof, effluent treated for recycling back to the home for non-drinking water purposes and environmentally sensitive stormwater management. – Illustration courtesy of Gold Coast Water FOREWORD The Australian Academy of Technological Sciences and Engineering is one of the four national learned academies. Membership is by nomination and its Fellows have achieved distinction in their fields. The Academy provides a forum for study and discussion, explores policy issues relating to advancing technologies, formulates comment and advice to government and to the community on technological and engineering matters, and encourages research, education and the pursuit of excellence.
    [Show full text]
  • The Allconnex Water Debacle: Lessons in Devising Better Governance Mechanisms for Government Business Enterprises
    Bond University Research Repository The Allconnex Water debacle: Lessons in devising better governance mechanisms for government business enterprises Baumfield, Victoria Published in: Bond Law Review Licence: CC BY-NC-ND Link to output in Bond University research repository. Recommended citation(APA): Baumfield, V. (2012). The Allconnex Water debacle: Lessons in devising better governance mechanisms for government business enterprises. Bond Law Review, 24(2), 1-63. https://blr.scholasticahq.com/article/5594 General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. For more information, or if you believe that this document breaches copyright, please contact the Bond University research repository coordinator. Download date: 30 Sep 2021 Bond Law Review Volume 24 | Issue 2 Article 1 2012 The Allconnex Water Debacle: Lessons in Devising Better Governance Mechanisms for Government Business Enterprises Victoria S. Baumfield Bond University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://epublications.bond.edu.au/blr This Article is brought to you by the Faculty of Law at ePublications@bond. It has been accepted for inclusion in Bond Law Review by an authorized administrator of ePublications@bond. For more information, please contact Bond University's Repository Coordinator. The Allconnex Water Debacle: Lessons in Devising Better Governance Mechanisms for Government Business Enterprises Abstract This article examines problems that occurred as a result of the Queensland government’s restructuring of the State’s water industry from 2006 onwards.
    [Show full text]
  • Questions on Notice 21 Apr 1998
    21 Apr 1998 Questions on Notice 639 QUESTIONS ON NOTICE (4) Education Queensland is monitoring the situation. 1425. Building Better Schools Program, It has not recommended a school. A decision will be Ashgrove Electorate made once a recommendation is received. Amended answer by Minister for Education. See also (5) The situation is being monitored. I do not expect a p. 5177, 31 December 1997 recommendation from Education Queensland for a school unless there is some material change to the Mr FOURAS asked the Minister for Education existing situation. (25/11/97)— With reference to the Building Better Schools Program which was instigated in 1995— 2. Premier's Office, Staff Designations and Salaries How much has been expended under this excellent program at State primary schools in the Ashgrove Mr BEATTIE asked the Premier (3/3/98)— Electorate namely (a) Ashgrove State School, (b) What is the name, designation and salary range of Payne Road State School, (c) Oakleigh State School, each of the staff members currently included in the (d) Hilder Road State School and (e) Newmarket State staffing complement of the Premier's Office, including School? any departmental liaison, administrative or media Mr QUINN (5/3/98): Education Queensland officer attached to the Premier's Office. has expended $1,554,343 on the Building Better Mr Borbidge (2/4/98): Staff of the Office of the Schools program at Ashgrove, Payne Road, Oakleigh, Premier are listed in the phone listing for the Hilder Road and Newmarket State Schools. Department of the Premier and Cabinet. There are no Departmental liaison, administrative or 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison of Water-Energy Trajectories of Two Major Regions Experiencing Water Shortage
    Comparison of water-energy trajectories of two major regions experiencing water shortage Ka Leung Lam, Paul A. Lant, Katherine R. O'Brien, and Steven J. Kenway* School of Chemical Engineering, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia *Corresponding author, e-mail: [email protected] Abstract Water shortage, increased demand and rising energy costs are major challenges for the water sector worldwide. Here we use a comparative case study to explore the long-term changes in the system-wide water and associated energy use in two different regions that encountered water shortage. In Australia, South East Queensland (SEQ) encountered a drought from 2001 to 2009, while Perth has experienced a decline in rainfall since the 1970s. This novel longitudinal study quantifies and compares the urban water consumption and the energy use of the water supply systems in SEQ and Perth during the period 2002 to 2014. Unlike hypothetical and long-term scenario studies, this comparative study quantifies actual changes in regional water consumption and associated energy, and explores the lessons learned from the two regions. In 2002, Perth had a similar per capita water consumption rate to SEQ and 48% higher per capita energy use in the water supply system. From 2002 to 2014, a strong effort of water conservation can be seen in SEQ during the drought, while Perth has been increasingly relying on seawater desalination. By 2014, even though the drought in SEQ had ended and the drying climate in Perth was continuing, the per capita water consumption in SEQ (266 L/p/d) was still 28% lower than that of Perth (368 L/p/d), while the per capita energy use in Perth (247 kWh/p/yr) had increased to almost five times that of SEQ (53 kWh/p/yr).
    [Show full text]
  • Final Costs Will Be Determined When the 2007 Plan Is Released in the Middle of the Year
    PROOF ISSN 1322-0330 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Hansard Home Page: http://www.parliament.qld.gov.au/hansard/ E-mail: [email protected] Phone: (07) 3406 7314 Fax: (07) 3210 0182 Subject FIRST SESSION OF THE FIFTY-SECOND PARLIAMENT Page Wednesday, 14 March 2007 PROCEDURE ................................................................................................................................................................................... 965 Speaker’s Statement—Register of Members’ Interests ....................................................................................................... 965 PETITIONS ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 966 TABLED PAPER .............................................................................................................................................................................. 966 MINISTERIAL STATEMENTS .......................................................................................................................................................... 966 Water Infrastructure .............................................................................................................................................................. 966 South East Queensland Infrastructure Plan ......................................................................................................................... 967 Gold Coast Desalination
    [Show full text]
  • City of Gold Coast Water Netserv Plan Part A
    City of Gold Coast Water Netserv Plan Part A November 2019 Table of Contents 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 4 1.1 Purpose of the document .................................................................................................. 4 1.2 Review period ................................................................................................................... 4 1.3 Corporate alignment / Organisational context.................................................................... 4 1.3.1 City Vision ................................................................................................................ 4 1.3.2 Our business ............................................................................................................ 5 1.3.3 Our commitment ...................................................................................................... 6 1.3.4 Water Strategy ......................................................................................................... 6 1.4 External policies and plans................................................................................................ 6 1.4.1 South East Queensland Regional Plan .................................................................... 6 1.4.2 Seqwater Strategic Plan & Water for life .................................................................. 7 1.4.3 WaterQ: a 30 year strategy for Queensland’s water sector .....................................
    [Show full text]
  • WSAA Water Services Association of Australia
    WSAA Water Services Association of Australia ANNUAL REPORT 2011- 2012 VISION Valued Water Solutions for a Better Future MISSION WSAA will advocate, collaborate and innovate to deliver value for its members CONTENTS > 01 About WSAA > 02 Message from the WSAA Chair > 03 Message from the WSAA Executive Director > 04 Members of the Board > 06 Highlights 2011-2012 > 08 WSAA Members > 14 WSAA Projects 2011-2012 WSAA ANNUAL REPORT 2011-2012 ABOUT WATER SERVICES ASSOCIATION OF AUSTRALIA The Water Services Association of Australia (WSAA) is the industry body that supports the Australian urban water industry. Its members :01 and associate members provide water and sewerage services to approximately 16 million Australians and many of Australia’s largest industrial and commercial enterprises. The Association facilitates collaboration, knowledge sharing, networking and cooperation within the urban water industry. It is proud of the collegiate attitude of its members which has led to industry-wide approaches to national water issues. WSAA can demonstrate success in the standardisation of industry performance monitoring and benchmarking, as well as many research outcomes of national significance. The Executive of the Association retain strong links with policy makers and legislative bodies and their influencers, to monitor emerging issues of importance to the urban water industry. WSAA is regularly consulted and its advice sought by decision makers when developing strategic directions for the water industry. In achieving the Vision and Mission, WSAA is ever mindful of the importance of urban water services to the community particularly the protection of public health. The industry aims to be responsive to its customers and provide cost effective delivery of water services, while ensuring the sustainable management of urban water resources and minimising any impacts on the environment.
    [Show full text]
  • The Economic Impact of Water Restrictions on Water-Dependent Business in South East Queensland, Australia, Finanzwissenschaftliche Diskussionsbeiträge, No
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Burdack, Doreen Working Paper The economic impact of water restrictions on water- dependent business in South East Queensland, Australia Finanzwissenschaftliche Diskussionsbeiträge, No. 65 Provided in Cooperation with: Chair of Public Finance, University of Potsdam Suggested Citation: Burdack, Doreen (2011) : The economic impact of water restrictions on water-dependent business in South East Queensland, Australia, Finanzwissenschaftliche Diskussionsbeiträge, No. 65, Universität Potsdam, Lehrstuhl Finanzwissenschaft, Potsdam This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/59040 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open
    [Show full text]
  • Serving Our Communities
    SERVING OUR COMMUNITIES Annual report 2015–16 14 September 2016 The Honourable Curtis Pitt MP The Honourable Mark Bailey MP Treasurer Minister for Main Roads, Road Safety and Ports Minister for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Partnerships Minister for Energy, Biofuels and Water Supply Minister for Sport Level 15, Capital Hill, 85 George Street Level 9, Executive Building, 100 George Street BRISBANE QLD 4000 BRISBANE QLD 4000 Dear Ministers I am pleased to present the Annual Report 2015–16 and financial statements for the Queensland Bulk Water Supply Authority, trading as Seqwater. The report details the non-financial and financial performance of Seqwater from 1 July 2015 to 30 June 2016. I certify that this Annual Report complies with: • the prescribed requirements of the Financial Accountability Act 2009 and the Financial Performance Management Standard 2009, and • the detailed requirements contained in the Annual report requirements for Queensland Government agencies. A checklist outlining the annual reporting requirements with page references is included in this report. Yours sincerely Mr Dan Hunt Chairman 1 Seqwater | Annual Report 2015–16 About this report This Annual Report records our achievements in delivering Translation and interpreting assistance a safe, secure and cost-effective water supply to the people of South East Queensland in 2015–16. Our performance is Seqwater is committed to providing measured against the objectives and targets in our Operational accessible services to Queenslanders Plan 2015–16 and the Statement of Obligations set by our from all culturally and linguistically responsible Ministers. The report also describes our financial diverse backgrounds. If you have difficulty position for the year.
    [Show full text]
  • Watery47 P1.P65
    Newsletter No 47 July 2005 Guess How Many AGMs The 21st AGM – goodness me, is it that many already? – of the Association was duly held at the Public Services Club in April. Attendance, I regret to report, was somewhat disappointing with only some 20 members and spouses attending. Is it fear of being nominated for office that keeps people away? The risk is small and the opportunities for reunion – which is what the members have told the Committee they want – are obvious. As usual, those attending enjoyed each other’s company. Elections were duly held. Jim Uhlmann stood down as President after two years in office and automatically moved to the position of Past President. The meeting carried a vote of thanks to Jim for his contibution. In consequence of this change, Vice President Gordon Wilson retired from office after long and distinguished service to WRRA. Jim Program for the Year thanked Gordon, on behalf of the Association, for his efforts over the years. Once again, the Committee has From the Editor’s Chair The incoming President is Eric Davis who drawn up a program for the next year. is no doubt known to many of our members Country members may have some No doubt you have all seen the sign on (see page 3 for biographical information). difficulty in availing themselves of the back of buses and trucks that says “If Col Hazel has returned to the Committee the opportunities, but the offer for you can’t see my mirrors, I can’t see you.” by accepting the position of Vice President.
    [Show full text]