DOCSLIB.ORG

Questions on Notice 21 Apr 1998

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Questions on Notice 21 Apr 1998 21 Apr 1998 Questions on Notice 639 QUESTIONS ON NOTICE (4) Education Queensland is monitoring the situation. 1425. Building Better Schools Program, It has not recommended a school. A decision will be Ashgrove Electorate made once a recommendation is received. Amended answer by Minister for Education. See also (5) The situation is being monitored. I do not expect a p. 5177, 31 December 1997 recommendation from Education Queensland for a school unless there is some material change to the Mr FOURAS asked the Minister for Education existing situation. (25/11/97)— With reference to the Building Better Schools Program which was instigated in 1995— 2. Premier's Office, Staff Designations and Salaries How much has been expended under this excellent program at State primary schools in the Ashgrove Mr BEATTIE asked the Premier (3/3/98)— Electorate namely (a) Ashgrove State School, (b) What is the name, designation and salary range of Payne Road State School, (c) Oakleigh State School, each of the staff members currently included in the (d) Hilder Road State School and (e) Newmarket State staffing complement of the Premier's Office, including School? any departmental liaison, administrative or media Mr QUINN (5/3/98): Education Queensland officer attached to the Premier's Office. has expended $1,554,343 on the Building Better Mr Borbidge (2/4/98): Staff of the Office of the Schools program at Ashgrove, Payne Road, Oakleigh, Premier are listed in the phone listing for the Hilder Road and Newmarket State Schools. Department of the Premier and Cabinet. There are no Departmental liaison, administrative or 1. Kajabbi, Construction of School media officer attached to the Office of the Premier. Mr McGRADY asked the Minister for The Office is staffed with fewer personnel than was Education (3/3/98)— the case under the former Labor Premier, but in similar designations. With reference to the people of the township of Kajabbi who are attempting to secure the establishment of a school for their children and as 3. Public Housing there are currently 18 children in Kajabbi of which 12 are of school age and as the establishment of the Mr NUTTALL asked the Minister for Public school has received not only my support but also the Works and Housing (3/3/98)— support of the Mayor of the Cloncurry Shire Council— With reference to his department's policy not to (1) Will a school be built in Kajabbi? construct public housing dwellings where the land component is in excess of $100,000— (2) Is a major factor against the establishment of a school that the mining operation of Mt Cuthbert (1) When was this policy introduced? relies on a fly-in fly-out workforce. (2) Will this restrict the areas throughout the State, (3) Is he aware that only one family in the township and in particular in the Brisbane metropolitan has a child with direct association with the mine? area, where public housing can be constructed, therefore impacting with a higher density of (4) What other factors are holding back a decision public housing in certain suburbs and not in more to provide a school for Kajabbi? "affluent" areas? (5) When can the people of Kajabbi expect a final (3) Will he explain why it would not be in the decision from him on this matter? interests of fairness or equity to tenants and Mr Quinn (15/4/98): other applicants to build public housing in areas (1) Consideration of the need to provide schools in where the land component is in excess of particular areas is undertaken by Education $100,000, particularly when the land is already in Queensland which then makes a recommendation to the ownership of the Department of Housing? me. Dr Watson (2/4/98): (1) (2) & (3) The Education Queensland, in considering the need for department has no formal policy in place which puts a schools, operates within the context of state strategic dollar limit on the purchase of land. As the premise is planning and applies appropriate service standards. false, the remaining questions are not relevant. This government has established a framework for strategic planning which is now being incorporated in 4. Home Help Services the service standards used by Education Queensland. Mr HAMILL asked the Minister for Health The case for a school at Kajabbi will be analysed by (3/3/98)— Education Queensland in this context. Any With reference to the provision of home help recommendation to me will then be made from that services— perspective, and take account of the availability of (1) What is the budget for home help for each of funds and priorities for their use. Queensland Health's districts? (2) No. (2) How many people receive home help in each of (3) Yes. Queensland Health's districts? 640 Questions on Notice 21 Apr 1998 (3) What was the budget for home help in 1996-97 period, to achieve best practice performance and how many Queenslanders received services standards. under the scheme? Consistent with the Government's intention of Mr Horan (1/4/98): restricting further outsourcing, the Guidelines require (1) The total home help funding under the Coalition two stringent tests be met before an existing Government is now $124 million, compared with $101 Government service is considered for outsourcing. million under the previous Goss Labor Government, The first is aimed at ensuring that any outsourcing an increase of almost 25% in just two years under the which is approved will provide a reasonable return for Coalition Government. Government (set at a minimum of $200,000 per annum in net avoidable costs); and the second considers the (2) Currently, home help services are provided to cost performance of the in-house workforce (which 94,000 Queenslanders, a significant increase on the must exceed the cost of an alternative service 73,400 people who received assistance in 1995 under provider, including all workforce transition costs such the previous State and Federal Labor governments as Voluntary Early Retirement payments, by more (3) Refer to (1) and (2). than 10%). Rather than giving a "green" light to further outsourcing, the Guidelines actually place significant 5. Public Service, Employment Security barriers to further outsourcing of Government Mr FOURAS asked the Premier (3/3/98)— services. These require Cabinet approval, and will not be approved unless there are real and demonstrable With reference to the policy of "Employment Security returns to the Queensland community. for the Queensland Public Service" championed by the Premier in September 1997, and also to the draft (2) The Employment Security Policy has proven to be Organisational Change Guidelines prepared by the very effective. Since its introduction, no Office of the Public Service on 10 October 1997— redundancies have been approved by the Public Service Commissioner, and public servants are (1) Will he confirm that the work being undertaken assured of maximum employment security. by the Office of the Public Service, driven by Chief Executives of a number of departments, Full consultation has occurred across the public and in particular the head of Treasury, Dr service and within Cabinet. McTaggart, is a retreat from the commitments given by the Premier in September 1997; in 6. Rockhampton Airport particular, does the document, on page 3, give the "green" light to significant outsourcing Mr PEARCE asked the Minister for Natural providing there are savings of more than 10 per Resources (3/3/98)— cent; if so, what impact will this have on With reference to the proposed extensions to the employment security for Queensland's Public Rockhampton Airport runway and the Water Servants? Resources Commission's 'Rockhampton Flood (2) Is it a fact that the turmoil facing the Management Study—November 1992' which Government on Public Service security is a recommended that "no new development of a direct result of the fact that the Premier residential, commercial or industrial nature be deliberately and surreptitiously took a permitted in designated floodways", and given that the submission to Cabinet on Public Service extended runway will be across designated employment which does not have support floodways, with possible impacts on flood levels, across Government, that he did it in the absence velocity and direction— of the Treasurer and the Treasury is now (1) What safeguards will he insist on to ensure that dictating Government policy on the Public the health and safety of residents in the flood Service? impact zone is protected? Mr Borbidge (2/4/98): (2) Will he ensure that residents in the flood impact (1) The final version of the Organisational Change zone are compensated where it is proven that Guidelines referred to by the Member for Ashgrove the constructed extended runway was the were approved by the Government on 15 December probable cause of changes in flood movement 1997. These were prepared by the Office of the Public and levels, therefore causing damage to Service following extensive consultation within the property? public service and with the unions, and apply to all Mr Springborg (30/3/98): Government Departments, including the teaching, (1) At the outset it should be noted that the Fitzroy health, police, fire and ambulance services. Shire Council is the responsible approval authority for One of the principles of the Employment Security Rockhampton City Council's proposals for the Policy was that further outsourcing of government Rockhampton Airport extensions. Those extensions services would be limited to those situations where are located within the boundaries of the Fitzroy Shire the public service workforce could not attain an and Rockhampton City Council is seeking approval acceptable level of service delivery and value for from the Fitzroy Shire under the Local Government money. (Planning and Environment) Act 1990.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Est Cte C 1 Oct 1998
    1 Oct 1998 Estimates C—Public Works; Housing 141 ESTIMATES COMMITTEE C hearing for two 30-minute breaks, one in the morning session and one in the afternoon session, as well as for a one-hour lunchbreak between 1.30 p.m. and Mr G. B. Fenlon (Chair) Mr V. G. Johnson 2.30 p.m., subject to any changes that the Committee Mrs J. M. Attwood Mr B. E. Laming may deem appropriate as these proceedings unfold Mrs E. A. Cunningham Mr P. G. Reeves today. I remind members of the Committee and the Minister that the time limit for questions is one minute P UBLIC WORKS; HOUSING and three minutes for answers. A bell will ring once IN A TTENDANCE 15 seconds before the end of these time limits and twice when the time limit is up. A two-minute Hon. R. E. Schwarten, Minister for Public Works extension of time may be given with the consent of and Minister for Housing the questioner. The Sessional Orders require that at Department of Public Works— least half of the time is allocated to non-Government Mr M. Grierson, Acting Director-General members. Government members and non- Government members of the Committee will take Mr T. Woodward, Director, Finance and turns in asking questions in blocks lasting Information Technology approximately 20 minutes. Mr W. Pashen, Assistant Director, Finance and Copies of the Committee's questions on notice Information Technology and the Minister's responses are available from our Ms C. Tonkin, Director, Queensland Purchasing staff here today. In accordance with the Sessional Mr L.
    [Show full text]
  • Question on Notice No. G1 Asked on 2 October 2012
    Question on Notice No. G1 Asked on 2 October 2012 The Education and Innovation Committee asked the Minister for Education, Training and Employment (Mr Langbroek) – QUESTION: I refer to page 5 of the Service Delivery Statement and note the commitment to invest $10 million to fund 500 university scholarships. Can the Minister please advise how this will assist women to enter career pathways that have otherwise been male dominated? ANSWER: I thank the Committee for the question. The Supporting Women Scholarships program is a $10m Queensland Government initiative providing scholarships for women of all ages considering a future in agricultural science, architecture, building services, engineering, geology, or information technology. Scholarships are available for study at the certificate IV level through to postgraduate level. The program will assist Queensland to meet current and future skills needs by increasing women’s participation in key industry sectors linked to the Government’s four economic pillars Each of these 500 scholarships will provide successful recipients with up to $20,000 over four years to complete study in targeted male-dominated fields in areas of skills shortage, such as engineering, agricultural science, geology, architecture, building services and information technology, from Certificate IV to postgraduate level. These scholarships will assist Queensland women who are studying Year 12, women seeking to change careers or those women who are seeking to re-enter the workforce — many of whom would otherwise be unable to undertake tertiary or higher-level study due to financial or other constraints. Successful applicants will be able to use the funding to offset the costs of their studies, which can sometimes be a barrier to taking up these opportunities.
    [Show full text]
  • Queensland Water Directorate
    supporting ellearning splportunities Queensland Water Directorate Demonstrated progress report Funding - up to AUD$l00,000 Submitted September 2008 to the Industry Integration of E-learning business activity of the national training system's e-learning strategy, the Australian Flexible Learning Framework @ Commonwealth of Australia 2008 For more information about E-learning for Industry: Phone: (02) 6207 3262 Email: [email protected] Website: htt~://industrv.flexiblelearninq.net.au Mail: Canberra Institute of Technology Strategic and National Projects GPO Box 826 Canberra ACT 2601 DET RTI Application 340/5/1797 - File A - Document No. 566 of 991 TAFE Queensland - - * Queensland Government Industry integration of e-learning September 08 Progress Report qldwaterand TAFE Queensland 1. Business - provider partnerships numbers and growth In the past business - provider partnerships for trainiug in the water sector have been adhocand there has been little national coordination. Moreover, at the start of this project there were or~lytwo examples of a business - provider partnership for e-learning in the water industry in Australia. These were: a relationship between Wide Bay Water and Sunwater for water worker training and a preliminary arrangement between Wide Bay TAFE and Wide Bay Water to provide on-line training services to other Councils. The collaborative model of industry sector long-term funding has already (in the first three months) resulted in an increase in the number of relationships through two mechanisms. These are: new partnerships as a direct result of the project, and negotiation of partnerships with other RTOs through leverage provided by the project. Two new partnerships have arisen as a result of the industry funding.
    [Show full text]
  • Drivers for Decentralised Systems in South East Queensland
    Drivers for Decentralised Systems in South East Queensland Grace Tjandraatmadja, Stephen Cook, Angel Ho, Ashok Sharma and Ted Gardner October 2009 Urban Water Security Research Alliance Technical Report No. 13 Urban Water Security Research Alliance Technical Report ISSN 1836-5566 (Online) Urban Water Security Research Alliance Technical Report ISSN 1836-5558 (Print) The Urban Water Security Research Alliance (UWSRA) is a $50 million partnership over five years between the Queensland Government, CSIRO’s Water for a Healthy Country Flagship, Griffith University and The University of Queensland. The Alliance has been formed to address South-East Queensland's emerging urban water issues with a focus on water security and recycling. The program will bring new research capacity to South-East Queensland tailored to tackling existing and anticipated future issues to inform the implementation of the Water Strategy. For more information about the: UWSRA - visit http://www.urbanwateralliance.org.au/ Queensland Government - visit http://www.qld.gov.au/ Water for a Healthy Country Flagship - visit www.csiro.au/org/HealthyCountry.html The University of Queensland - visit http://www.uq.edu.au/ Griffith University - visit http://www.griffith.edu.au/ Enquiries should be addressed to: The Urban Water Security Research Alliance PO Box 15087 CITY EAST QLD 4002 Ph: 07-3247 3005; Fax: 07-3405 3556 Email: [email protected] Ashok Sharma - Project Leader Decentralised Systems CSIRO Land and Water 37 Graham Road HIGHETT VIC 3190 Ph: 03-9252 6151 Email: [email protected] Citation: Grace Tjandraatmadja, Stephen Cook, Angel Ho, Ashok Sharma and Ted Gardner (2009). Drivers for Decentralised Systems in South East Queensland.
    [Show full text]
  • Queensland Teachers' Union Submission to the Senate Inquiry
    Queensland Teachers’ Union Submission to the Senate Inquiry into the Development and Implementation of National School Funding Arrangements and School Reform March 2014 2 Contents Introduction ................................................................................................... 4 Background .................................................................................................... 5 Section 1: Précis of previous submissions ...................................................... 6 A. Queensland state schools in rural and remote settings ............................. 6 B. Queensland state schools in regional centres ............................................ 9 C. Queensland state schools in metropolitan areas ..................................... 11 Section 2: National Partnerships schools on the road to success .................. 14 A. Harris Fields State School ....................................................................... 14 B. Redbank Plains State High School ........................................................... 16 C. Glenala State High School ....................................................................... 17 D. Cairns West State School ........................................................................ 18 E. Urangan Point State School .................................................................... 20 Section 3: The “Great Results Guarantee” .................................................... 21 Distribution of federal funds in Queensland: The “Great Results Guarantee” ....
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter September 2020
    MOUNT ISA NEWS September 2020 Your community newsletter MountAwarded no. 2 in Australia Isa for stargazing! - Tourism Australia Phone 07 4747 3200 | email [email protected] | www.mountisa.qld.gov.au | www.facebook.com/MountIsaCityCouncil/ MAYOR’S DESK... I am pleased to welcome and introduce our new Interim Chief Executive Officer, David Keenan, to Mount Isa City Council. David started at Council on Monday September 28, with a handover period in place until CEO Sharon Ibardolaza’s last day on Friday, October 9. In the past few months, Sharon has done an amazing job leading Council's COVID-19 Response Group, the decisions of which have kept community members and Council staff members safe. She has also been in regular communication with Councils regularly recalculate the rate-in-the-dollar the District Disaster Management Group, amount they use to calculate how much they Queensland Health and State Disaster Coordination collect in rates in any given year. Centre, to ensure the response group's decisions are based on the most up-to-date advice and It’s important to remember that councils do not information. base their revenue from property revaluations – they collect the amount determined in their On behalf of Council staff and elected members, budgets. we wish Sharon the very best as she begins a new chapter of her career in Brisbane. In this financial year’s Budget, we implemented a zero overall residential rate increase, in recognition David was previously CEO at Southern Downs of the challenges many people are facing during Regional Council and has more than 25 years of the COVID-19 pandemic.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Heritage Register
    Explanatory Notes for Development Assessment Local Heritage Register Amendments to the Queensland Heritage Act 1992, Schedule 8 and 8A of the Integrated Planning Act 1997, the Integrated Planning Regulation 1998, and the Queensland Heritage Regulation 2003 became effective on 31 March 2008. All aspects of development on a Local Heritage Place in a Local Heritage Register under the Queensland Heritage Act 1992, are code assessable (unless City Plan 2000 requires impact assessment). Those code assessable applications are assessed against the Code in Schedule 2 of the Queensland Heritage Regulation 2003 and the Heritage Place Code in City Plan 2000. City Plan 2000 makes some aspects of development impact assessable on the site of a Heritage Place and a Heritage Precinct. Heritage Places and Heritage Precincts are identified in the Heritage Register of the Heritage Register Planning Scheme Policy in City Plan 2000. Those impact assessable applications are assessed under the relevant provisions of the City Plan 2000. All aspects of development on land adjoining a Heritage Place or Heritage Precinct are assessable solely under City Plan 2000. ********** For building work on a Local Heritage Place assessable against the Building Act 1975, the Local Government is a concurrence agency. ********** Amendments to the Local Heritage Register are located at the back of the Register. G:\C_P\Heritage\Legal Issues\Amendments to Heritage legislation\20080512 Draft Explanatory Document.doc LOCAL HERITAGE REGISTER (for Section 113 of the Queensland Heritage
    [Show full text]
  • Water Recycling in Australia (Report)
    WATER RECYCLING IN AUSTRALIA A review undertaken by the Australian Academy of Technological Sciences and Engineering 2004 Water Recycling in Australia © Australian Academy of Technological Sciences and Engineering ISBN 1875618 80 5. This work is copyright. Apart from any use permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission from the publisher. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction rights should be directed to the publisher. Publisher: Australian Academy of Technological Sciences and Engineering Ian McLennan House 197 Royal Parade, Parkville, Victoria 3052 (PO Box 355, Parkville Victoria 3052) ph: +61 3 9347 0622 fax: +61 3 9347 8237 www.atse.org.au This report is also available as a PDF document on the website of ATSE, www.atse.org.au Authorship: The Study Director and author of this report was Dr John C Radcliffe AM FTSE Production: BPA Print Group, 11 Evans Street Burwood, Victoria 3125 Cover: - Integrated water cycle management of water in the home, encompassing reticulated drinking water from local catchment, harvested rainwater from the roof, effluent treated for recycling back to the home for non-drinking water purposes and environmentally sensitive stormwater management. – Illustration courtesy of Gold Coast Water FOREWORD The Australian Academy of Technological Sciences and Engineering is one of the four national learned academies. Membership is by nomination and its Fellows have achieved distinction in their fields. The Academy provides a forum for study and discussion, explores policy issues relating to advancing technologies, formulates comment and advice to government and to the community on technological and engineering matters, and encourages research, education and the pursuit of excellence.
    [Show full text]
  • The Allconnex Water Debacle: Lessons in Devising Better Governance Mechanisms for Government Business Enterprises
    Bond University Research Repository The Allconnex Water debacle: Lessons in devising better governance mechanisms for government business enterprises Baumfield, Victoria Published in: Bond Law Review Licence: CC BY-NC-ND Link to output in Bond University research repository. Recommended citation(APA): Baumfield, V. (2012). The Allconnex Water debacle: Lessons in devising better governance mechanisms for government business enterprises. Bond Law Review, 24(2), 1-63. https://blr.scholasticahq.com/article/5594 General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. For more information, or if you believe that this document breaches copyright, please contact the Bond University research repository coordinator. Download date: 30 Sep 2021 Bond Law Review Volume 24 | Issue 2 Article 1 2012 The Allconnex Water Debacle: Lessons in Devising Better Governance Mechanisms for Government Business Enterprises Victoria S. Baumfield Bond University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://epublications.bond.edu.au/blr This Article is brought to you by the Faculty of Law at ePublications@bond. It has been accepted for inclusion in Bond Law Review by an authorized administrator of ePublications@bond. For more information, please contact Bond University's Repository Coordinator. The Allconnex Water Debacle: Lessons in Devising Better Governance Mechanisms for Government Business Enterprises Abstract This article examines problems that occurred as a result of the Queensland government’s restructuring of the State’s water industry from 2006 onwards.
    [Show full text]
  • The Railway Technical Society of Australasia – the First Ten Years
    The Railway Technical Society of Australasia The First Ten Years Philip Laird ENGINEERS AUSTRALIA RTSA The Railway Technical Society of Australasia The First Ten Years Philip Laird What may have been. An image from the 1990s of a future Speedrail Sydney - Canberra train at Sydney’s Central Station. Photo: Railway Digest/ARHSnsw. Three Vlocity trains standing at Southern Cross Station. These trains coupled with track upgrades as part of Victoria’s Regional Fast Rail program have seen a 30 per cent increase in patronage in their first full year of operation. Photo: Scott Martin 2008 Contents Introduction 4 RTSA Executive Chairman Ravi Ravitharan Acknowledgements Foreword 5 Hon Tim Fischer AC Section 1 Railways in Australasia 6 Section 2 The National Committee on Railway Engineering 11 Section 3 The Railway Technical Society of Australasia 17 3.1 The formation and early years 17 The Railway Technical Society of Australasia 3.2 Into the 21st century (2000 - 2004) 22 PO Box 6238, Kingston ACT 2604 3.3 Recent developments (2004 - 2008) 27 ABN 380 582 55 778 Section 4 Engineering and rail sector growth 34 4.1 The iron ore railways 34 © Copyright Philip Laird 4.2 Rail electrification in Queensland 36 and the Railway Technical Society of Australasia 2008 4.3 Queensland ‘s Mainline Upgrade 38 4.4 An East - West success story 40 Design and prepress by Ruby Graphics 4.5 The Australian Rail Track Corporation 42 Printed and bound by BPA Print Group 4.6 Perth’s urban rail renaissance 44 PO Box 110, Burwood VIC 3125 4.7 Rail in other capital cities 46 4.6 Trams and light rail 48 National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry 4.9 New railways in Australia 50 4.10 New Zealand railways 52 Title: The Railway Technical Society of Australasia : the first ten years / Philip Laird.
    [Show full text]
  • Traveltrain Renewal: Sunlander 14
    Traveltrain renewal: Sunlander 14 Report 8 : 2014–15 Queensland Audit Office Location Level 14, 53 Albert Street, Brisbane Qld 4000 PO Box 15396, City East Qld 4002 Telephone (07) 3149 6000 Email [email protected] Online www.qao.qld.gov.au © The State of Queensland. Queensland Audit Office (2014) Copyright protects this publication except for purposes permitted by the Copyright Act 1968. Reproduction by whatever means is prohibited without the prior written permission of the Auditor-General of Queensland. Reference to this document is permitted only with appropriate acknowledgement. Front cover image is an edited photograph of Queensland Parliament, taken by QAO. ISSN 1834-1128 Traveltrain renewal: Sunlander 14 Contents Summary ..................................................................................................................................... 1 Conclusions ....................................................................................................................... 2 Key findings ....................................................................................................................... 2 Traveltrain renewal program ............................................................................................. 5 Recommendations ............................................................................................................ 5 Reference to comments .................................................................................................... 5 1 Context ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 1974 Cabinet Minutes Paragraphs
    1974 Queensland Cabinet Minutes A report for Queensland State Archives By Jonathan Richards • Introduction Brisbane and many other parts of Queensland were flooded in January 1974. In that year, the Commonwealth Games was held at Christchurch, New Zealand. The average annual car registration fee was $32.61 and the basic weekly wage for an adult male, employed under a Commonwealth award and working in Brisbane, was $58.30. The clothing industry was in the process of converting to the metric system.1 On the political scene, Queensland’s Premier Joh Bjelke-Petersen (and it would appear most of the Cabinet) disagreed with Prime Minister Gough Whitlam and the Labor government in Canberra. The state enjoyed a robust electoral gerrymander, with 7,000 voters in the bush enjoying the same representation in Parliament as 25,000 metropolitan residents.2 1 OM May, 1975, Queensland Year Book 1975, Brisbane, Australian Bureau of Statistics 2 Ibid. Cabinet approved a new $680,000 plane for the Premier in July 1974: it was bigger and faster than the $241,000 model delivered less than twelve months before.3 After the state election was held on 7th December 1974, there were 39 National (previously Country) Party members, 30 Liberal Party representatives, and 11 MP’s from the Australian Labor Party. At the election, two Cabinet members retired and one was not given a portfolio in the new Government. Nine days after the election, Cabinet approved the rezoning of land owned by Minister Russ Hinze (appointed in November), for a quarry.4 • Commonwealth Government relations with Queensland Relations with the Commonwealth Government were one of the major topics of discussion for the Queensland Cabinet in 1974.
    [Show full text]