Was Tertullian a Misogynist? a Re-Examination of This Charge Based on a Rhetorical Analysis of Tertullian’S Work

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Was Tertullian a Misogynist? a Re-Examination of This Charge Based on a Rhetorical Analysis of Tertullian’S Work Was Tertullian a Misogynist? A re-examination of this charge based on a rhetorical analysis of Tertullian’s work. Submitted by Donna-Marie Cooper to the University of Exeter as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Theology In September 2012 This thesis is available for Library use on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. I certify that all material in this thesis which is not my own work has been identified and that no material has previously been submitted and approved for the award of a degree by this or any other University. 1 ABSTRACT. Feminist scholars have long assumed that Tertullian, a second-century Church Father, was a misogynist. This assumption is based almost exclusively on the infamous “Devil’s gateway” passage in the opening chapter of De cultu feminarum. However, feminist scholars have read this passage in isolation without reference to its wider context in De cultu feminarum and without considering other passages from Tertullian’s treatises. Furthermore, they have failed to recognize the influence which ancient rhetoric had on Tertullian’s work. By reading the “Devil’s gateway” passage in a wider context, and by engaging in a detailed analysis of Tertullian’s use of rhetoric, it becomes evident that Tertullian’s comments in that passage are not based on misogynistic view of women. Rather, they serve a specific rhetorical purpose in one particular treatise. Furthermore, by looking beyond the “Devil’s gateway” passage to other passages in which Tertullian makes reference to women, it is clear that his comments in the “Devil’s gateway” passage are not representative of his view of women. An examination of themes such as Mary, the anthropology of woman and woman’s role in the social order reveals a more nuanced picture of Tertullian’s view of women, than the one offered by some feminist scholars. By bringing together two areas - Tertullian’s use of rhetoric and feminist critique of Tertullian and of the Fathers in general - I will challenge the assumption that Tertullian was a misogynist and show that in some areas Tertullian can make a positive contribution to the feminist question. 2 CONTENTS. TITLE PAGE. PAGE 1. ABSTRACT. PAGE 2 CONTENTS. PAGE 3. INTRODUCTION. PAGES 4 - 15 PART 1: THE “DEVIL’S GATEWAY” PASSAGE AND DE CULTU FEMINARUM INTRODUCTION. PAGES 16 - 21 CHAPTER 1: De cultu feminarum and Eve’s Role in the Fall. PAGES 22 - 37 CHAPTER 2: De cultu feminarum: What is it Really About? PAGES 38 - 67 PART 2: MARY INTRODUCTION. PAGES 68 - 81 CHAPTER 3: Tertullian and Mary’s Virginity. PAGES 82 - 103 CHAPTER 4: Mary and the Son of David. PAGES 104 - 123 CHAPTER 5: Mary and the Flesh of Christ. PAGES 124 - 150 PART 3: WOMAN INTRODUCTION. PAGES 151 - 160 CHAPTER 6: Tertullian and Women. PAGES 161 - 205 CHAPTER 7: Women’s Role’s Within the Social Order. PAGES 206 - 249 CONCLUSION. PAGES 250 - 256 BIBLIOGRAPHY. PAGES 257 - 268 3 INTRODUCTION. Among some feminist scholars, there has been a long-standing assumption that the second- century Church Father Tertullian was a misogynist.1 This charge is based almost exclusively on the infamous “Devil’s gateway” passage in the opening chapter of a treatise entitled De cultu feminarum. The passage concerned reads: And do you not know that you are [each] an Eve? The sentence of God on this sex of yours lives in this age: the guilt must of necessity live too. You are the devil's gateway: you are the unsealer of that [forbidden] tree: you are the first deserter of the divine law: you are she who persuaded him whom the devil was not valiant enough to attack. You destroyed so easily God's image, man. On account of your desert - that is, death - even the Son of God had to die...2 A number of feminist scholars have pointed to the “Devil’s gateway” passage as the primary source of evidence of Tertullian’s misogyny. Elisabeth Schüssler Fiorenza, for example, accuses Tertullian of having “a theology that evidences a deep misogynist contempt and fear of women”.3 Marie Turcan in Vita Latina claims that: “The woman is in [Tertullian’s] eyes a public menace”. With reference to De cultu feminarum she writes: “The man has everything to fear from her, and the first Adam would have done well to be wary about her. The eye with which he looks at her is singularly critical...No occasion is lost to show her vain, conceited, sensual, frivolous, avid and at the same time stupid and cunning”.4 Elizabeth Clark, in Women in the Early Church5 selects only the “Devil’s gateway” passage to illustrate 1 By misogyny I mean someone who has a deep-seated hatred of women, as a sexually defined group. Barbara Finlay makes a distinction between misogyny and androcentricism. She claims that whilst Tertullian is androcentric (looking at women through eyes of men) it does not follow that he is a misogynist (hatred of women). See B. Finlay, “Was Tertullian a Misogynist? A Reconsideration” in the Journal of the Historical Society Vol. 3 Issue 3-4, June 2003), p. 508 and p. 511. 2De cultu feminarum 1.1.1-2 (Trans. S. Thelwall, Ante-Nicene Fathers Volume IV) In Latin the passage reads: “…et Euam te esse nescis? Viuit sententia Dei super sexum istum in hoc saeculo: uiuat et reatus necesse est. Tu es diaboli ianua; tu es arboris illius resignatrix; tu es diuinae legis prima desertrix; tu es quae eum suasisti, quem diabolus aggredi non ualuit; tu imaginem Dei, hominem, tam facile elisisti; propter tuum meritum, id est mortem, etiam filius Dei mori habuit…” 3E.S. Fiorenza, In Memory of Her:a feminist theological reconstruction of Christian origins (London: SCM Press, 1983), p. 55. 4 M. Turcan, ‘Etre femme selonTertullien’ in Vita Latina (Sept 1990), pp. 15-21 (English translation: “Being a woman according to Tertullian” from www.Tertullian.org. Turcan however does soften in her interpretation of Tertullian in the second half of her article and highlights some of his more positive attitudes towards women. 5E.A. Clark, Women in the Early Church (Collegeville, Message of the Fathers of the Church 13, 1983), pp. 38- 39. 4 Tertullian's position on the origins of sin, and Averil Cameron relies upon Clark's work to state that Tertullian was "writing in luridly misogynistic terms”.6 One criticism which feminist scholars make of the comments in the “Devil’s gateway” is that Tertullian placed the entire responsibility for the Fall on the shoulders of Eve. Ruether, for example, in Religion and Sexism, writes: “...Eve is made to sound as though she bore the primary responsibility [for the Fall]. Tertullian demands an abasement of woman and the covering of her shameful female nature as the consequence of her continuing imaging of this guilty nature of Eve”.7 In another book, Sexism and God-Talk, Ruether makes a similar point: “...the scape-goating of Eve as the cause of the Fall of Adam makes all women, as her daughters, guilty for the radical impotence of ‘man’ in the face of evil, which is paid for only by the death of Christ!”8 She points to Tertullian as the prime example of this scape-goating. A further example can be found in Mary Daly’s The Church and the Second Sex in which she writes: “The primary grievance against [Eve] was her supposed guilt in the Fall. The violence of some of these tirades on this subject has psychoanalytic implications...”9 Daly points to Tertullian’s “Devil’s gateway” passage as the example. The problem with feminist scholars’ readings of the “Devil’s gateway” passage is that they have used this one passage as the hermeneutical key with which to read Tertullian as a whole. In so doing they treat Tertullian like a systematic theologian and fail to take into account the wider context of De cultu feminarum, whilst also ignoring other relevant passages throughout his corpus. However, on many topics Tertullian is not a systematic theologian. For example, as I will demonstrate throughout this thesis, Tertullian did not have a systematic account on the topics of the Fall, Mary, and women. In his treatises Tertullian writes as an orator, reacting to various controversies which had arisen, with the intention of winning an argument or persuading his audience to follow a particular course of action. As a skilled orator, Tertullian employed techniques from ancient rhetoric in order to make his case more persuasive. In this thesis I argue that, in order to understand the meaning behind a certain passage, it is necessary to understand the rhetorical 6 A. Cameron, “Early Christianity and the Discourse of Female Desire” in L.J. Archer, S. Fischler and M. Wyke (ed.) Women in Ancient Societies: An Illusion of the Night (London: Macmillan Press, 1994), p. 153. 7 R.R. Ruether, “Misogyny and Virginal Feminism in the Fathers of the Church” in Ruether (ed.), Religion and Sexism: Images of Women in the Jewish and Christian Tradition (Wipf and Stock Publishers, 1998), p. 157. 8 R.R. Ruether, Sexism and God-Talk: Towards a Feminist Theology (Boston: Beacon Press, 1993), p. 167. 9 M. Daly, The Church and the Second Sex (New York: Harper and Row, 1975), p. 45. 5 context of that passage. One of the aims of my thesis is to demonstrate that a rhetorical reading is the key to understanding Tertullian’s comments in the “Devil’s gateway” passage because this passage serves a specific rhetorical purpose in De cultu feminarum.
Recommended publications
  • Depending on Evil an Analysis of Late Antique Christian Demonologies
    Depending on Evil An Analysis of Late Antique Christian Demonologies Thomas Andruszewski 2/17/2008 Table of Contents Preface ........................................................................................................................................................... i Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................1 Part I - In Support of Apocalypse Chapter I - Justin Martyr, Athenagoras and Tertullian................................................................................7 Chapter II - Origen .....................................................................................................................................23 Chapter III - Augustine of Hippo ................................................................................................................33 Part II - Demonizing Demons: the Construction of Evil in Late Antiquity Chapter IV - Taking Aim, the Role of Demons in the Polemical Arsenal of Early Church Fathers...........39 Conclusion ..................................................................................................................................................55 1 Preface This thesis provides an analysis of the demonologies included in the writings of some of the early Church Fathers. They include: Justin Martyr’s Apology (150 CE),1 Athenagoras’ Legatio (177 CE),2 Tertullian’s Apology (197 CE),3 Origen’s On First Principles (218 CE)4 and Against Celsus (248 CE),5
    [Show full text]
  • What Sin?? John F
    The Linacre Quarterly Volume 43 | Number 3 Article 7 August 1976 Hate the Sin But Love the Sinner. Sin? What Sin?? John F. Russell Follow this and additional works at: http://epublications.marquette.edu/lnq Recommended Citation Russell, John F. (1976) "Hate the Sin But Love the Sinner. Sin? What Sin??," The Linacre Quarterly: Vol. 43: No. 3, Article 7. Available at: http://epublications.marquette.edu/lnq/vol43/iss3/7 Hate the Sin But Love the Sinner. Sin? What Sin?? John F. Russell, J.D. (This is a greatly abbreviated theologians and others who have adaptation from a chapter in Dr. expressed their scholarly and oth­ Russell's cur r e n t book-length erwise knowledgeable views on manuscript on the homosexual the matter and the impact that issue in all the major religious de­ the various avenues of approach nominations in the United States. will have on church, society, and In gathering material for the especially the individual.) book, Dr. Russell, who has been The N ew Catholic Encyclope­ a professional scholar on organ­ dia describes the homosexual act ized homosexual activities for as a "grave transgression of the over two decades, has interviewed divine will." literally hundreds of religious and lay officials of all denominations Right? along with numerous gay activ­ The National Conference of ists. In addition, he has re­ Catholic B ish 0 p s , speaking searched well over 10,000 articles, through its Principles to Guide publications, and news items on Confessors in Questions of Homo­ the subject. The material present­ sexuality, says that homosexual ed here barely penetrates even practices are a "grave violation of this single aspect of the multi­ the law of God." fac eted scope of the total problem realized by the religious and lay Right? communities, homosexual and And the most recent expression heterosexual alike.
    [Show full text]
  • Ingo Berensmeyer Literary Culture in Early Modern England, 1630–1700
    Ingo Berensmeyer Literary Culture in Early Modern England, 1630–1700 Ingo Berensmeyer Literary Culture in Early Modern England, 1630–1700 Angles of Contingency This book is a revised translation of “Angles of Contingency”: Literarische Kultur im England des siebzehnten Jahrhunderts, originally published in German by Max Niemeyer Verlag, Tübingen 2007, as vol. 39 of the Anglia Book Series. ISBN 978-3-11-069130-6 e-ISBN (PDF) 978-3-11-069137-5 e-ISBN (EPUB) 978-3-11-069140-5 DOI https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110691375 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. For details go to http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. Library of Congress Control Number: 2020934495 Bibliographic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data are available from the Internet at http://dnb.dnb.de. ©2020 Ingo Berensmeyer, published by Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston The book is published with open access at www.degruyter.com. Cover image: Jan Davidszoon de Heem, Vanitas Still Life with Books, a Globe, a Skull, a Violin and a Fan, c. 1650. UtCon Collection/Alamy Stock Photo. Typesetting: Integra Software Services Pvt. Ltd. Printing and binding: CPI books GmbH, Leck www.degruyter.com Preface to the Revised Edition This book was first published in German in 2007 as volume 39 of the Anglia Book Series. In returning to it for this English version, I decided not simply to translate but to revise it thoroughly in order to correct mistakes, bring it up to date, and make it a little more reader-friendly by discarding at least some of its Teutonic bag- gage.
    [Show full text]
  • Tertullian's Text of the New Testament Outside the Gospels
    TERTULLIAN’S TEXT OF THE NEW TESTAMENT OUTSIDE THE GOSPELS by BENJAMIN DOUGLAS HAUPT A thesis submitted to the University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY School of Philosophy, Theology, and Religion College of Arts and Law University of Birmingham January 2019 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. ABSTRACT This study examines Tertullian’s references to the New Testament outside the Gospels, in order to determine whether he was citing from a Greek or Latin copy of these writings. A new collection of these references was undertaken and is explained in the Appendix. The conclusion of the analysis is that Tertullian was quoting the New Testament writings using Greek exemplars and translating anew in most instances. Tertullian was one of the first Christians to have undertaken such translation work. It is proposed that Tertullian was participating in and influenced by a broad cultural-linguistic movement called the Second Sophistic. Latin writers like Cicero, Quintilian, Varro, and Apuleius were also participants, and their translation of Greek works into Latin likely formed Tertullian to become a literary translator.
    [Show full text]
  • Catholic Diocese Tucson
    Asesor del Vaticano dice que se acabó la época de encubrimiento JUNE/JULY 2019 VOL. XI I NO. XI diocesetucson.org — ver pagina 17 Bishop Edward J. Weisenburger places his hands upon the head of Deacon Jesus Haros-Mendez during the ordination Mass June 1 in St. Augustine Cathedral. For a story and more pictures of the Mass, see pages 10-11. Diocese announces spring assignments — See pages 6 and 18 2 CATHOLIC OUTLOOK JUNE/JULY 2019 Catholic high school 2019 graduates by the numbers Below are listed the numbers students; and the amount of if Catholic high school graduates scholarship money awarded by school; valedictorians, in the school’s graduates from salutatorian or other outstanding institutions of higher learning. The Diocese of Tucson, its parishes or ministries do not support or advocate on behalf of this tour company and are not liable for its actions. Consumers are encouraged to research all tour packages and cancellation details before making business decisions. Investing. It’s about more than money. It’s about your future. Stocks | Bonds | Mutual Funds | Annuities | CDs | IRAs | IRA Rollovers UITs | Retirement Plans | Cash Management | Financial Planning Ben Palazzo Senior Vice President/Investments Branch Manager (520) 209-7400 | (877) 879-3156 Toll-Free [email protected] 4380 N. Campbell Avenue, Suite 201 Tucson, Arizona 85718 Celebrating 32 Years! Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated | Member SIPC & NYSE | www.stifel.com JUNE/JULY 2019 CATHOLIC OUTLOOK 3 Ribbon cut marks official opening for new Cathedral Square center By MICHAEL BROWN reception following a Mass and ribbon cutting. Kicanas, Catholic Foundation Executive Director Managing Editor Bishop Weisenburger noted that the facility Ernie Nedder, diocesan Property and Insurance Praising donors, engineers and architects, houses the parish offices of St.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ethics of Disbelief: What Does New Atheism Mean for America? an Honors Thesis for the Department of Religion Marysa E. Shere
    The Ethics of Disbelief: What Does New Atheism Mean for America? An honors thesis for the Department of Religion Marysa E. Sheren Tufts University ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to extend my deep gratitude to Laura Doane and the generous donors who make the Tufts Summer Scholars grant program possible, and to Professor Elizabeth Lemons, who served as my mentor throughout my completion of the program in the summer of 2011. That summer of research was the time during which this project first took root, and I am so grateful to those who have taken an interest and invested in my research on New Atheism. TABLE OF CONTENTS The Ethics of Disbelief: An Introduction....................................................................... 1-10 Chapters Chapter 1: THE “SECULAR” AND THE “RELIGIOUS”......................................... 11-29 Chapter 2: IS RELIGION INHERENTLY VIOLENT?.............................................. 30-51 Chapter 3: RELIGION, NEW ATHEISM AND AMERICAN PUBLIC LIFE .......... 51-77 Looking Forward: A Conclusion .......................................................................................77 Bibliography .................................................................................................................iv-ix iii The Ethics of Disbelief: An Introduction Journalists have used the term “New Atheism” to describe a 21st-century movement spurred by the success of several non-fiction books. These books, authored by hard-line secularists and consumed by millions, have made a particularly large splash in the United States over the past five years, sparking a national public debate about God and religion. In this introductory segment of my paper, I will explain what distinguishes New Atheism from other kinds of atheism, and will identify the factors that have led the American public and mainstream media to interpret New Atheism as a “new” social and intellectual innovation.
    [Show full text]
  • Private Acts and Public Culture in Early Modern England Nicholas Mcdowell University of Exeter, [email protected]
    Criticism Volume 46 Article 8 Issue 2 When Is a Public Sphere 2004 Interpreting Communities: Private Acts and Public Culture in Early Modern England Nicholas Mcdowell University of Exeter, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/criticism Recommended Citation Mcdowell, Nicholas (2004) "Interpreting Communities: Private Acts and Public Culture in Early Modern England," Criticism: Vol. 46: Iss. 2, Article 8. Available at: http://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/criticism/vol46/iss2/8 07 rev-mcdowell (279-298) 10/27/04 11:28 AM Page 281 NICHOLAS MCDOWELL Interpreting Communities: Private Acts and Public Culture in Early Modern England Better a Shrew Than a Sheep: Women, Drama and the Culture of Jest in Early Mod- ern England by Pamela Allen Brown. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2003. Pp. xiv + 263. $19.95 paper, $49.95 cloth. Increase and Multiply: Governing Cultural Reproduction in Early Modern England by David Glimp. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2003. Pp. xxvii + 230. $21.95 paper, $60.95 cloth. Common Bodies: Women, Touch, and Power in Seventeenth-Century England by Laura Gowing. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2003. Pp. x + 260. $38.00 cloth. Individuals, Families, and Communities in Europe, 1200–1800: The Urban Foun- dations of Western Society by Katherine A. Lynch. Cambridge Studies in Popu- lation, Economy and Society in Past Time 37. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003. Pp. xiv + 250. $65.00 cloth. Rhetoric and Courtliness in Early Modern Literature by Jennifer Richards. Cam- bridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003. Pp. vi + 212. $60.00 cloth. Reading, Society, and Politics in Early Modern England by Kevin Sharpe and Steven N.
    [Show full text]
  • Johann Gerhard and the Good Use of Usury
    Journal of Markets & Morality Volume 22, Number 2 (Fall 2019): 539–556 Copyright © 2019 Johann Gerhard Mathias Schmoeckel and the Good Use Professor of Civil Law and History of Law of Usury University of Bonn The History of Usury: Antique Aversion and Canon Law Prohibition Johann Gerhard remains one of the leading Lutheran theologians of all time. He was a great erudite who combined the different trends in theology, philoso- phy, law, and other fields to broaden the horizon of Lutherans of his time and to develop modern positions that were more favorable from an economic point of view.1 The French bishop Jacques-Bénigne Bossuet (1627–1704) consid- ered Gerhard to be the third most important theologian after Luther and Martin Chemnitz (1522–1586). His texts excel in endless citations, not only showing off his learning, but also his knowledge of all confessional and national traditions. Gerhard’s treatment of usury, in particular, begins by tracing its history starting with the Old Testament.2 1 Jörg Baur, “Johann Gerhard,” in Gestalten der Kirchengeschichte, ed. Martin Greschat, vol. 7 (Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, 1982), 99–111; Martin Honecker, “Johann Gerhard,” in Theologische Realenzyklopadie [hereafter: TRE ], ed. Gerhard Müller, vol. 12 (Berlin: De Gruyter, 1984), 448–53. 2 General introductions include Wilhelm Endemann, Studien in der romanisch-kanonistis- chen Wirthschafts- und Rechtslehre: bis gegen Ende des siebzehnten Jahrhunderts, vol. 1 (Berlin: Guttentag, 1874), 9–10; August M. Knoll, Der Zins in der Scholastik (Innsbruck: Tyrolia, 1933); John T. Noonan, The Scholastic Analysis of Usury (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1957); Bartolomé Clavero, Usura: del uso económico de la religión en la historia (Madrid: Tecnos, 1984); idem, “The Jurisprudence on 539 Scholia The Jewish tradition (Deut.
    [Show full text]
  • The Enlightenment and Orientalist Discourse on the Aryan
    Jews, Aryans Chap. 1 7/23/02 9:42 AM Page 8 CHAPTER 1 The Enlightenment and Orientalist Discourse on the Aryan THE ENLIGHTENMENT BACKGROUND rientalist and postcolonialist criticism has positioned the origin of much Othat it seeks to critique within the Enlightenment project. Edward Said identified the Enlightenment as a unified trajectory and master sign of both Orientalism and colonialism (Said 1978). Ashis Nandy traced the roots of colonialism’s mandate to absolutize the relative differences between cultures to the cultural arrogance of Enlightenment Europe. Partha Chatterjee prob- lematized Enlightenment historiography (Chatterjee 1986). Peter van der Veer has blamed Enlightenment discourse for the erroneous politicization of Hinduism (Van der Veer 1998). Curiously, none of their arguments dwells on specifics—a common methodological flaw of critical schools which mea- sure past texts against contemporary claims of emancipation or fantasies of dissent (Fluck 1996: 228). In these instances, critics assess the Enlightenment in light of the subsequent colonial experience. Their critical canon virtually ignores the fundamental texts of the period. Indeed, the Enlightenment has suffered much at the hands of poststructuralism’s vague and atextual treatment. There is clearly a need for a reappraisal of the Enlightenment with reference to its literature. In satirical works of the eighteenth century, there appeared a general theme, barely hidden under the fiction and in the satire itself: Asia can and should offer lessons. The pittoresque Oriental tale provided an ideal medium through which authors could expose the vices of their own corrupt civil and religious institutions. The satirist’s task had been made that much easier, since travel accounts minutely described the religious and secular institutions of Asia and marked analogies to European systems of rule.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Effects of the Philosophical Concept of Community*
    ECONOMIC EFFECTS OF THE PHILOSOPHICAL CONCEPT OF COMMUNITY* ALFONSO DÍAZ VERA Fecha de recepción: 30 de enero de 2020 Fecha de aceptación: 22 de junio de 2020 “Society is like the air, necessary to breathe but insufficient to live on.” George Santayana. I INTRODUCTION Introductory textbooks in the History of Economic Thought in use at colleges and universities devote little space to Scholasticism and its influence. Even those that do not start straight with the Physio- crats, Thomas Aquinas appears stuck between Ancient Greek Phi- losophers and Thomas Mun. Scholasticism with “medieval” economic thought characterized as primitive and focused on “obsolete” issues like usury and just price. Sometimes it is even categorized among the schools that promote State intervention1. * This work was supported by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF)/ Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities/State Agency of Research(AEI)/ National Programme for Fostering Excellence in Scientific and Tech- nical Research/”Projections of Spanish Scholasticism on British and Anglo-Saxon Thought” (reference number: FFI2017-84435-P). 1 “Aquinas as the Scholastics were overwhelmingly concerned with questions of the organization and control of economic life – in regard to which they adopted laws and principles which severely restricted entrepreneurial activity” (Medema & Warren eds., 2013, p.19). Procesos de Mercado: Revista Europea de Economía Política Vol. XVII, n.º 2, Otoño 2020, pp. 317 a 330 318 ALFONSO DÍAZ VERA This was not the opinion of F.A. Hayek, who appreciated some Scholastic authors as part of the individualistic tradition of West- ern civilization rooted on the legacy of Ancient Greeks and Romans like Pericles, Thucydides, Cicero and Tacitus2.
    [Show full text]
  • Verging on the Polemical. Towards an Interdisciplinary Approach to Medieval Religious Polemic
    Verging on the polemical. Towards an interdisciplinary approach to medieval religious polemic Sita Steckel* The present article attempts to take stock of the different definitions and connotations of the concept of religious »polemic« in order to encourage a more interdisciplinary debate on this topic. It argues that the interdisciplinary research fields engaging with religious polemics could generate important historical perspectives on current conflict cultures, and appear to be on the verge of an expansion of the horizon towards the global, connecting an extant, highly active research field on religious encounter in the Euro-Mediterranean area to the study of Asia and Africa. To be able to realize an integrative perspective and to write a com- parative and entangled history of religious polemics, it seems necessary to reflect on the dif- ferences and gaps marking the overlapping research fields. The article therefore offers a brief historiographical sketch concerning the concept of »polemics«, and then offers a pre liminary list of constituents or dimensions of the polemical which have been highlighted in the differ- ent research fields. In a concluding section, case studies from the accompanying contribu- tions in this volume furnish examples on possible further perspectives, with an emphasis on non-traditional approaches cutting across established research fields. Keywords: Religious polemics, inter-religious contact, intra-religious conflicts, medieval Judaism, medieval Latin Christianity, medieval Islam, history of Medieval Studies. 1. Introduction: The problems and potentials of an interdisciplinary approach to religious polemics The study of religious polemics remains a highly active subfield of the study of religion, espe- cially in research concerning the medieval Euro-Mediterranean area.
    [Show full text]
  • A Thesis Submitted in Conformity with the Requirernents University Of
    WILLIAM OF OCKEfAM' S THEORY OF CONSCIENCE Sharon Marie Kaye A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirernents for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Department of Philosophy University of Toronto O Copyright by Sharon Marie Kaye 1997 National Library Bibliothéque nationale du Canada Acquisitions and Acquisitions et Bibliographie Services services bibliographiques 395 Wellington Street 395. rue Wellington OttawaON K1AON4 Omwa ON KIA ON4 Canada Canada The author has granted a non- L'auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive licence ailowing the exclusive permettant à la National Library of Canada to Bibliothèque nationale du Canada de reproduce, loan, distribute or sen reproduire, prêter, distribuer ou copies of this thesis in microfom, vendre des copies de cette thèse sous paper or electronic formats. la fome de rnicrofiche/nlm, de reproduction sur papier ou sur format électronique. The author retains ownership of the L'auteur conserve la propriété du copyright in this thesis. Neither the droit d'auteur qui protège cette thèse. thesis nor substantial extracts fiom it Ni la thèse ni des extraits substantiels may be printed or otheMrise de celle-ci ne doivent être imprimés reproduced without the author's ou autrement reproduits sans son permission. autorisation. WILLIAM CONSCIENCE Sharon Marie Kaye Doctor of Philosophy 1997 Graduate Department of Philosophy University of Toronto This work is designed to show that there is an implicit connection between Ockham's academic and political careers in his theory of conscience. Thomas Aquinas offers a theory of moral responsibility according to which the conscientious individual has knowledge of the rightness of her act which does not preclude her doing otherwise.
    [Show full text]