DOCSLIB.ORG

Operational Assessment 2019

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Operational Assessment 2019 Northeast Fisheries Science Center Reference Document 20-01 Operational Assessment of the Black Sea Bass, Scup, Bluefish, and Monkfish Stocks, Updated Through 2018 by Northeast Fisheries Science Center January 2020 Northeast Fisheries Science Center Reference Document 20-01 Operational Assessment of the Black Sea Bass, Scup, Bluefish, and Monkfish Stocks, Updated Through 2018 by Northeast Fisheries Science Center NOAA Fisheries Service, Northeast Fisheries Science Center, 166 Water Street, Woods Hole, Massachusetts 02543 USA US DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Marine Fisheries Service Northeast Fisheries Science Center Woods Hole, Massachusetts January 2020 Northeast Fisheries Science Center Reference Documents This series is a secondary scientific series designed to assure the long-term documentation and to enable the timely transmission of research results by Center and/or non-Center researchers, where such results bear upon the research mission of the Center (see the outside back cover for the mission statement). These documents receive internal scientific review, and most receive copyediting. The National Marine Fisheries Service does not endorse any proprietary material, process, or product mentioned in these documents. If you do not have Internet access, you may obtain a paper copy of a document by contacting the senior Center author of the desired document. Refer to the title page of the document for the senior Center author’s name and mailing address. If there is no Center author, or if there is corporate (i.e., non-individualized) authorship, then contact the Center’s Woods Hole Laboratory Library (166 Water St., Woods Hole, MA 02543-1026). Information Quality Act Compliance: In accordance with section 515 of Public Law 106-554, the Northeast Fisheries Science Center completed both technical and policy reviews for this report. These predissemination reviews are on file at the NEFSC Editorial Office. This document may be cited as: Northeast Fisheries Science Center. 2020. Operational assessment of the black sea bass, scup, bluefish, and monkfish stocks, updated through 2018. NEFSC Ref Doc 20- 01; 160 p. Available from: http://www.nefsc.noaa.gov/publications/ Contents Contents .......................................................................................................................................... 2 Preface ............................................................................................................................................. 4 Report of the 2019 Operational Assessment Review Committee (OARC) (Aug. 2019) .............. 5 OARC Comments on 2019 Operational Assessment: Monkfish ................................................ 6 OARC Comments on 2019 Operational Assessment: Black Sea Bass..................................... 10 OARC Comments on 2019 Operational Assessment: Scup ..................................................... 13 OARC Comments on 2019 Operational Assessment: Bluefish ................................................ 16 OARC Recommendations for Process Improvements .............................................................. 19 Stock Assessment Terms of Reference ......................................................................................... 20 A: Black Sea Bass Operational Assessment for 2019 .................................................................. 21 State of Stock ............................................................................................................................ 21 OFL Projections ........................................................................................................................ 21 Catch ......................................................................................................................................... 21 Catch and Status Table: Black Sea Bass ................................................................................... 22 Stock Distribution and Identification ........................................................................................ 23 Assessment Model .................................................................................................................... 23 Biological Reference Points (BRPs) ......................................................................................... 23 Qualitative status description .................................................................................................... 24 Research and Data Issues .......................................................................................................... 24 References ................................................................................................................................. 24 Tables ........................................................................................................................................ 26 Figures....................................................................................................................................... 28 B: Scup Operational Assessment for 2019 ................................................................................... 32 State of Stock ............................................................................................................................ 32 OFL Projections ........................................................................................................................ 32 Catch ......................................................................................................................................... 32 Catch and Status Table: Scup ................................................................................................... 34 Stock Distribution and Identification ........................................................................................ 35 Assessment Model .................................................................................................................... 35 Biological Reference Points (BRPs) ......................................................................................... 35 Qualitative status description .................................................................................................... 36 Research and Data Issues .......................................................................................................... 36 Operational Assessment August 2019 2 Table of Contents References ................................................................................................................................. 36 Tables ........................................................................................................................................ 37 Figures....................................................................................................................................... 40 C: Atlantic Bluefish Operational Assessment for 2019 ................................................................ 45 State of Stock ............................................................................................................................ 45 OFL Projections ........................................................................................................................ 45 Catch ......................................................................................................................................... 45 Catch and Status Table: Atlantic bluefish ................................................................................. 46 Stock Distribution and Identification ........................................................................................ 46 Assessment Model .................................................................................................................... 47 Biological Reference Points (BRPs) ......................................................................................... 47 Qualitative status description .................................................................................................... 47 Research and Data Issues .......................................................................................................... 48 References ................................................................................................................................. 48 Tables ........................................................................................................................................ 49 Figures....................................................................................................................................... 51 D. Monkfish Operational Assessment for 2019 ............................................................................ 56 Executive Summary .................................................................................................................. 56 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 57 TOR 1. Update data .................................................................................................................. 59 TOR 2. Estimate F, R, B ........................................................................................................... 64 TOR 3. Update BRPs ................................................................................................................ 65 TOR 4. Stock Status .................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Practical Handbook for Determining the Ages of Gulf of Mexico And
    A Practical Handbook for Determining the Ages of Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic Coast Fishes THIRD EDITION GSMFC No. 300 NOVEMBER 2020 i Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission Commissioners and Proxies ALABAMA Senator R.L. “Bret” Allain, II Chris Blankenship, Commissioner State Senator District 21 Alabama Department of Conservation Franklin, Louisiana and Natural Resources John Roussel Montgomery, Alabama Zachary, Louisiana Representative Chris Pringle Mobile, Alabama MISSISSIPPI Chris Nelson Joe Spraggins, Executive Director Bon Secour Fisheries, Inc. Mississippi Department of Marine Bon Secour, Alabama Resources Biloxi, Mississippi FLORIDA Read Hendon Eric Sutton, Executive Director USM/Gulf Coast Research Laboratory Florida Fish and Wildlife Ocean Springs, Mississippi Conservation Commission Tallahassee, Florida TEXAS Representative Jay Trumbull Carter Smith, Executive Director Tallahassee, Florida Texas Parks and Wildlife Department Austin, Texas LOUISIANA Doug Boyd Jack Montoucet, Secretary Boerne, Texas Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries Baton Rouge, Louisiana GSMFC Staff ASMFC Staff Mr. David M. Donaldson Mr. Bob Beal Executive Director Executive Director Mr. Steven J. VanderKooy Mr. Jeffrey Kipp IJF Program Coordinator Stock Assessment Scientist Ms. Debora McIntyre Dr. Kristen Anstead IJF Staff Assistant Fisheries Scientist ii A Practical Handbook for Determining the Ages of Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic Coast Fishes Third Edition Edited by Steve VanderKooy Jessica Carroll Scott Elzey Jessica Gilmore Jeffrey Kipp Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission 2404 Government St Ocean Springs, MS 39564 and Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission 1050 N. Highland Street Suite 200 A-N Arlington, VA 22201 Publication Number 300 November 2020 A publication of the Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission pursuant to National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Award Number NA15NMF4070076 and NA15NMF4720399.
    [Show full text]
  • Seasonal and Size-Based Predation on Two Species of Squid by Four Fish
    605 Abstract-Longfin inshore (Loligo Seasonal and size-based predation on pealeii) and northern shortfin (lllex illecebrosus) squids are considered two species of squid by four fish predators important prey species in the North­ west Atlantic shelf ecosystem. The on the Northwest Atlantic continental shelf diets of four major squid predators, bluefish (Pomatomus saltatrix), goose­ Michelle D. Staudinger fish (Lophius americanus), silver hake (Merluccius bilinearis), and summer Department of Natural Resources Conservation flounder (Paralichthys dentatus), were 160 Holdsworth Way examined for seasonal and size-based University of Massachusetts, Amherst changes in feeding habits. Summer Amherst, Massachusetts 01003-9285 and winter, two time periods largely Email address: [email protected] absent from previous evaluations, were found to be the most impor­ tant seasons for predation on squid, and are also the periods when the majority of squid are landed by the regional fishery. Bluefish >450 mm, silver hake >300 mm, and summer Global depletion of marine predators significant predators of squid (Bow­ flounder >400 mm were all found has had dramatic effects on ecosys­ man et al., 2000). Squid represented to be significant predators of squid. tem structure and function (May et between 17% and 95% of the total These same size fish correspond to al., 1979; Jackson et al., 2001; Pauly mass consumed by these four finfish age classes currently targeted for et al., 2002). In many systems, the regionally. Dramatic changes in stock biomass expansion by management ramifications of such changes may not abundance and population structure committees. This study highlights be fully realized. Groundfish declines have occurred since specimens for the importance of understanding how have been linked to simultaneous Bowman et al.'s study were collect­ squid and predator interactions vary increases in cephalopod landings temporally and with changes in com­ ed 25-45 years ago.
    [Show full text]
  • Monkfish (Lophius Americanus)
    Emerging Species Profile Sheets Department of Fisheries and Aquaculture Monkfish (Lophius americanus) Common Names: Goosefish, monk-tail, American angler, angel-shark, American goosefish, all-mouth, fishing frog, baudroie. Description, Distribution and Biology Monkfish is a large bottom-dwelling (demersal), cartilaginous lethargic fish from the family Lophiidae. It has a flat body, large pectoral fins, a bulky head and an enormous mouth, with canine-like teeth. They are typically dark brown in colour shading to a light tan towards the abdomen with red pelvic fins and dark tipped pectoral fins (Fig.1). Monkfish is distributed throughout the western Atlantic Ocean, from the Labrador shelf to northern Florida. In Canadian waters, monkfish is more abundant on the southern Grand Banks, through the Gulf of St. Lawrence, on the Scotian Shelf and in the Bay of Fundy. This species generally inhabits warm slope regions with a variety of sediment types. It can be found at all depths from 0 to over 650 m and can tolerate a wide range of temperatures, but prefers temperatures between 6 and 10 0C. Studies on seasonal distribution suggest that monkfish will migrate to shallower bank waters during the summer and move to deeper waters Figure 1. Monkfish. Source: Steven A. Murawski, NOAA, Northeast Fisheries Science Center, Woods during the winter. Hole, MA In Canadian waters, monkfish typically spawn between June and September. Eggs, which are pelagic, spherical and 1.61 to 1.84 mm in diameter are deposited at the surface in large mucous sheets. The sheets are pink in colour and can contain more than a million eggs.
    [Show full text]
  • Delaware's Wildlife Species of Greatest Conservation Need
    CHAPTER 1 DELAWARE’S WILDLIFE SPECIES OF GREATEST CONSERVATION NEED CHAPTER 1: Delaware’s Wildlife Species of Greatest Conservation Need Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 7 Regional Context ........................................................................................................................................... 7 Delaware’s Animal Biodiversity .................................................................................................................... 10 State of Knowledge of Delaware’s Species ................................................................................................... 10 Delaware’s Wildlife and SGCN - presented by Taxonomic Group .................................................................. 11 Delaware’s 2015 SGCN Status Rank Tier Definitions................................................................................. 12 TIER 1 .................................................................................................................................................... 13 TIER 2 .................................................................................................................................................... 13 TIER 3 .................................................................................................................................................... 13 Mammals ....................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME BYCATCH UNIT CV FOOTNOTE(S) Mid-Atlantic Bottom Longline American Lobster Homarus Americanus 35.43 P
    TABLE 3.4.2a GREATER ATLANTIC REGION FISH BYCATCH BY FISHERY (2015) Fishery bycatch ratio = bycatch / (bycatch + landings). These fisheries include numerous species with bycatch estimates of 0.00; these 0.00 species are listed in Annexes 1-3 for Table 3.4.2a. All estimates are live weights. 1, 4 COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME BYCATCH UNIT CV FOOTNOTE(S) Mid-Atlantic Bottom Longline American lobster Homarus americanus 35.43 POUND 1.41 t Gadiformes, other Gadiformes 2,003.72 POUND .51 o, t Jonah crab Cancer borealis 223.42 POUND .67 t Monkfish Lophius americanus 309.83 POUND .49 e, f Night shark Carcharhinus signatus 593.28 POUND .7 t Offshore hake Merluccius albidus 273.33 POUND 1.41 Ray-finned fishes, other (demersal) Actinopterygii 764.63 POUND .64 o, t Red hake Urophycis chuss 313.85 POUND 1.39 k Scorpionfishes, other Scorpaeniformes 10.12 POUND 1.41 o, t Shark, unc Chondrichthyes 508.53 POUND .7 o, t Skate Complex Rajidae 27,670.53 POUND .34 n, o Smooth dogfish Mustelus canis 63,484.98 POUND .68 t Spiny dogfish Squalus acanthias 32,369.85 POUND 1.12 Tilefish Lopholatilus chamaeleonticeps 65.80 POUND 1.41 White hake Urophycis tenuis 51.63 POUND .85 TOTAL FISHERY BYCATCH 129,654.74 POUND TOTAL FISHERY LANDINGS 954,635.64 POUND TOTAL CATCH (Bycatch + Landings) 1,084,290.38 POUND FISHERY BYCATCH RATIO (Bycatch/Total Catch) 0.12 Mid-Atlantic Clam/Quahog Dredge American lobster Homarus americanus 4,853.05 POUND .95 t Atlantic angel shark Squatina dumeril 5,313.55 POUND .96 t Atlantic surfclam Spisula solidissima 184,454.52 POUND .93 Benthic
    [Show full text]
  • Order LOPHIIFORMES LOPHIIDAE Anglerfishes (Goosefishes, Monkfishes) by J.H
    click for previous page Lophiiformes: Lophiidae 1043 Order LOPHIIFORMES LOPHIIDAE Anglerfishes (goosefishes, monkfishes) by J.H. Caruso, University of New Orleans, Louisianna, USA iagnostic characters: Head and anterior part of body much depressed and very broad, posterior Dportion of body tapering; maximum size to about 200 cm, about 120 cm in the area, commonly 25 to 45 cm. Head rounded, bearing numerous sharp spines and ridges on dorsal and lateral surfaces, the most conspicuous of which are the following: 1 very large prominent spine or group of spines immediately an- terior to each pectoral-fin base (humeral spines); 1 pair of sharp prominent spines on either side of snout, im- mediately behind mouth (palatine spines); a bony ridge above eyes with 2 or 3 short spines (frontal spines); and 2 bony ridges on snout running forward from eyes (frontal ridges); interorbital space slightly concave. Mouth very large and wide, upper jaw protractile and the lower projecting, both bearing numerous long, sharp, depressible teeth; gill openings fairly large, low in pectoral-fin axil, sometimes extending for- ward in front of pectoral-fin base. Two separate dorsal fins, the first composed of 2 or 3 isolated slender spines on head (cephalic spines) and of 1 to 3 spines (often connected by a membrane, at least in juve- niles), at the level of pectoral fins (postcephalic spines); first 2 cephalic spines located at anterior end of snout, the foremost modified into an angling apparatus, usually bearing a fleshy appendage (esca) at tip;the third cephalic spine, when present, is located at level of humeral spines;anal fin with 6 to 11 soft rays, below second dorsal fin; caudal fin with 8 rays, the 2 outer rays unbranched; pectoral-fin rays unbranched, ter- minating in small fleshy filaments; pelvic fins on ventral surface of head, anterior to pectoral fins.
    [Show full text]
  • Maine - New Hampshire Inshore Groundfish Trawl Survey
    Final Report to the NOAA Fisheries - Northeast Region Cooperative Research Partners Initiative on the Maine - New Hampshire Inshore Groundfish Trawl Survey July 2002 – June 2003 Final Report Fall 2002 and Spring 2003 Maine – New Hampshire Inshore Trawl Survey Submitted to the NOAA Fisheries-Northeast Region, Cooperative Research Partners Initiative (Contract #NA16FL2259) By Sally A. Sherman, Vincent Manfredi, Jeanne Brown, Keri Stepanek, and John Sowles Maine Department of Marine Resources Douglas E. Grout New Hampshire Fish and Game Department And Robert Tetrault T/R Fish Inc. F/V Tara Lynn and F/V Robert Michael July 2004 MEDMR Research Reference Document 04/02 TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements iii Executive Summary iv Introduction 1 Materials andMethods 2 Station Selection 2 Vessels 3 Net 3 Public Notification 5 Sample collection 5 Handling Catch 6 Ichthyoplankton tows 6 Analysis and Presentation of Data 7 ReleaseofData 7 Results 7 ME/NH Survey the first 3 years 7 Fall 2002 Summary 8 Spring 2003Summary 11 Ichthyoplankton 13 Selected Species 15 Winter flounder (Pseudopluronectes americanus) 16 Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) 18 Haddock (Melanogrammus aeglefinus)20 Goosefish (Lophius americanus) 22 American plaice (Hippoglossoides platessoides) 24 Witch flounder (Glyptocephalus cynoglossus 26 White hake (Urophycis chuss) 28 Silver hake(Merluccius bilinearis) 30 Atlantic herring (Clupea harengus) 32 American lobster (Homarus americanus)34 Sea scallop(Placopecten magellanicus)36 Conclusions 38 Literature Cited 38 Appendix A: Individual Station Descriptions A-1 Appendix B:Survey Index B-1 Appendix C: Survey Catch Summaries C-1 Appendix D: Policy on Release of Trawl Survey Data D-1 Appendix E:Taxa List E-1 ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Logistically, this was a complex project that benefited from the assistance of many people.
    [Show full text]
  • Verified Species
    Gulf of Maine Responsibly Harvested® Verified Species This document contains assessment reports for the following verified species. Links to additional reports are listed at the end of this page. For a quick access to each report, click on a species name. American Lobster* American Plaice Homarus americanus Hippoglossoides platessoides Atlantic Mackerel Atlantic Pollock Scomber scombrus Pollachius virens Atlantic Sea Scallops Atlantic Spiny Dogfish** Placopecten magellanicus Squalus acanthias Kelp (multiple species) Haddock Alaria esculenta Melanogrammus aeglefinus Saccharina angustissima Saccharina latissimia Monkfish Redfish Lophius americanus Sebastes fasciatus White Hake Whiting (silver hake) Urophycis tenuis Merluccius bilinearis Winter Skate Leucoraja ocellata * Additional Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) Canadian certification for American Lobster available at: https://fisheries.msc.org/en/fisheries/bay-of-fundy-scotian-shelf-and-southern-gulf-of-st.-lawrence-lobster-trap/@@view ** Atlantic Spiny Dogfish Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) certification available at: https://fisheries.msc.org/en/fisheries/us-atlantic-spiny-dogfish/@@view Gulf of Maine Research Institute Responsibly Harvested Seafood from the Gulf of Maine Region Report on Gulf of Maine and Georges Bank American Lobster The fishery is managed by a competent authority and has a management plan in place that incorporates a science-based approach to ensure sustainability. o The American lobster fishery is managed jointly through ASMFC, Maine, New Hampshire, Massachusetts, and NMFS. The fishery is managed under Amendment 3 to the Interstate Fishery Management Plan (ISFMP), which utilizes the best available science to set biological reference points and harvest restrictions. If stock sizes are below management target levels, whether due to natural or man-made causes, management plans are established that enable rebuilding within a specified timeframe.
    [Show full text]
  • NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-NE-138
    * NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-NE-138 Essential Fish HabitatSource Document: Winter Flounder, Pseudopleuronectes americanus, Life History and Habitat Characteristics U. S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Marine Fisheries Service Northeast Region Northeast Fisheries Science Center Woods Hole, Massachusetts September 1999 Recent Issues 105. Review of American Lobster (Homarusamericanus) Habitat Requirements and Responses to Contaminant Exposures. By Renee Mercaldo-Allen and Catherine A. Kuropat. July 1994. v + 52 p., 29 tables. NTIS Access. No. PB96-115555. 106. Selected Living Resources, Habitat Conditions, and Human Perturbations of the Gulf of Maine: Environmental and Ecological Considerations for Fishery Management. By Richard W. Langton, John B. Pearce, and Jon A. Gibson, eds. August 1994. iv + 70 p., 2 figs., 6 tables. NTIS Access. No. PB95-270906. 107. Invertebrate Neoplasia: Initiation and Promotion Mechanisms -- Proceedings of an International Workshop, 23 June 1992, Washington, D.C. By A. Rosenfield, F.G. Kern, and B.J. Keller, comps. & eds. September 1994. v + 31 p., 8 figs., 3 tables. NTIS Access. No. PB96-164801. 108. Status of Fishery Resources off the Northeastern United States for 1994. By Conservation and Utilization Division, Northeast Fisheries Science Center. January 1995. iv + 140 p., 71 figs., 75 tables. NTIS Access. No. PB95-263414. 109. Proceedings ofthe Symposiu m on the Potential for Development of Aquaculture in Massachusetts: 15-17 February 1995, Chatham/Edgartown/Dartmouth, Massachusetts. By Carlos A. Castro and Scott J. Soares, comps. & eds. January 1996. v + 26 p., I fig., 2 tables. NTIS Access. No. PB97-103782. 110. Length-Length and Length-Weight Relationships for 13 Shark Species from the Western North Atlantic.
    [Show full text]
  • GOOSEFISH / Lophius Americanus Valenciennes 1837 /Monkfish, Angler, Allmouth, Molligut / Bigelow and Schroeder 1953:532-541
    GOOSEFISH / Lophius americanus Valenciennes 1837 /Monkfish, Angler, Allmouth, Molligut / Bigelow and Schroeder 1953:532-541 Description. Body greatly flattened dorsoventrally, much like a skate Meristics. Dorsal fin rays VI, 9-12; anal fin rays 8-10; pectoral fin or a ray (Fig; 143). Head rounded from above, about as broad as long, rays 25-28; pelvic fin rays I, 5; branchiostegals 6; vertebrae 26-31 enormous compared to body, which is narrow and tapering back of (Caruso 1983; Fahay 1983; Scott and Scott 1988). pectoral fins, giving the fish a tadpolelike appearance when viewed Color. The numerous goosefish observed by Bigelow and Schroeder from above. Mouth enormous, directed upward, lower jaw projecting were chocolate brown above, variously and finely mottled with pale so far beyond upper jaw that most lower teeth are freely exposed and dark. The dorsal fins, the upper sides of the pectoral fins, and the even when mouth is closed. Both jaws armed with long, slender, caudal fin are of a darker shade of the same color as the back, except curved teeth, alike in form but of various sizes, very sharp, mostly nearly black at the tips. The whole lower surface of the fish is white depressible, all pointing inward toward gullet. Some teeth as long as or dirty white, except the distal third of the pectoral fins gradually a few centimeters in a large fish. Lower jaw teeth mostly large, in one darkens to the color of the dorsal surface, and the pelvic fins become to three rows. Upper jaw teeth few in middle (a toothless space in the dusky distally.
    [Show full text]
  • NEAMAP Diet Guide
    NEAMAP Northeast Area Monitoring and Assessment Program Prey Species 2006-2012 Stenotomus chrysops VIMSCODE: 0001 Common Name: Scup Stomachs Processed (Full Workup Samples): 7,241 % Empty Stomachs or No/Improper Sample: 30% bony fishes cartilaginous fishes crustaceans other animals molluscs miscellaneous worms Prey Species COMMON LATIN COUNT PERCENT 0708 unidentified material unidentified material 1169 16.14 0775 unidentified polychaete Polychaeta 1015 14.02 0636 four‐eyed amphipods (Ampelisca spp.) Ampelisca spp. 729 10.07 0841 unidentified amphipod Amphipoda spp. 564 7.79 0507 common burrower amphipod Leptocheirus plumulosus 463 6.39 0758 unidentified right‐hand hermit crab Pagurus spp. 307 4.24 0671 amphipod (Corophium spp.) Corophium spp. 288 3.98 5039 unidentified clam Bivalvia 247 3.41 0694 amphipod (Gammarus spp.) Gammarus spp. 195 2.69 0604 sand shrimp Crangon septemspinosa 189 2.61 5000 unidentified fish Actinopterygii 144 1.99 7581 long‐clawed hermit crab Pagurus longicarpus 139 1.92 0673 unidentified crustacean Crustacea 137 1.89 0103 bay anchovy Anchoa mitchilli 117 1.62 5035 unidentified crab Decapoda 103 1.42 5003 unidentifed clam siphon Bivalvia 101 1.39 0764 polychaete (Pherusa affinis) Pherusa affinis 95 1.31 0574 unidentified mysid Mysidae 93 1.28 0699 mysid Neomysis americana 93 1.28 0798 polychaete (Terebellidae) Terebellidae 90 1.24 0709 unidentified mollusc meat Mollusca 85 1.17 0529 fish scales fish scales 80 1.10 0738 red‐eyed amphipod Monoculodes edwardsi 72 0.99 0658 skeleton shrimp (Caprellidae) Caprellidae spp 68 0.94 0884 unidentified drill or snail Gastropoda 67 0.93 5012 crab parts crab parts 65 0.90 0674 unidentified cumacean Cumacea 60 0.83 0656 Atlantic rock crab Cancer irroratus 56 0.77 0697 unidentified bloodworm Glycera spp.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix P – Essential Fish Habitat Assessment
    Appendix P – Essential Fish Habitat Assessment Ocean Wind Offshore Wind Farm Essential Fish Habitat Assessment March 2021 Page 1/103 Table of Contents 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................................................... 7 2. Project Description .............................................................................................................................................. 7 Construction of Offshore Infrastructure ................................................................................................... 10 Operations and Maintenance .................................................................................................................. 10 Decommissioning .................................................................................................................................... 11 3. Essential Fish Habitat Review .......................................................................................................................... 11 Project Area Benthic Habitat ................................................................................................................... 13 3.1.1 Wind Farm Area and Offshore Export Cable Corridors ....................................................................... 13 3.1.2 Estuarine Portion of the Offshore Export Cable Corridor .................................................................... 14 3.1.3 Submerged Aquatic Vegetation ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]