DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix P – Essential Fish Habitat Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Appendix P – Essential Fish Habitat Assessment Ocean Wind Offshore Wind Farm Essential Fish Habitat Assessment March 2021 Page 1/103 Table of Contents 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................................................... 7 2. Project Description .............................................................................................................................................. 7 Construction of Offshore Infrastructure ................................................................................................... 10 Operations and Maintenance .................................................................................................................. 10 Decommissioning .................................................................................................................................... 11 3. Essential Fish Habitat Review .......................................................................................................................... 11 Project Area Benthic Habitat ................................................................................................................... 13 3.1.1 Wind Farm Area and Offshore Export Cable Corridors ....................................................................... 13 3.1.2 Estuarine Portion of the Offshore Export Cable Corridor .................................................................... 14 3.1.3 Submerged Aquatic Vegetation ........................................................................................................... 15 Project Area Pelagic Habitat .................................................................................................................... 19 3.2.1 Wind Farm Area and Offshore Export Cable Corridor ......................................................................... 19 3.2.2 Estuarine Portion of the Export Cable Corridors ................................................................................. 19 EFH Designations .................................................................................................................................... 20 Life History Characteristics of EFH-Designated Species ........................................................................ 22 3.4.1 New England Finfish Species .............................................................................................................. 22 3.4.1.1 Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) ...................................................................................................... 22 3.4.1.2 Atlantic Herring (Clupea harengus) ............................................................................................. 23 3.4.1.3 Monkfish (Lophius americanus) .................................................................................................. 23 3.4.1.4 Ocean Pout (Macrozoarces americanus) ................................................................................... 24 3.4.1.5 Pollock (Pollachius pollachius) .................................................................................................... 25 3.4.1.6 Red hake (Urophycis chuss) ....................................................................................................... 25 3.4.1.7 Silver Hake (Merluccius bilinearis) .............................................................................................. 26 3.4.1.8 White Hake (Urophycis enuis) .................................................................................................... 26 3.4.1.9 Windowpane Flounder (Scophthalmus aquosus) ....................................................................... 27 3.4.1.10 Winter Flounder (Pseudopleuronectes americanus) ................................................................... 27 3.4.1.11 Witch Flounder (Glyptocephalus cynoglossus) ........................................................................... 28 3.4.1.12 Yellowtail Flounder (Limanda ferruginea) ................................................................................... 28 3.4.2 Mid-Atlantic Finfish Species ................................................................................................................ 29 Page 2/103 3.4.2.1 Atlantic Butterfish (Peprilus triacanthus) ..................................................................................... 29 3.4.2.2 Atlantic mackerel (Scomber scombrus) ...................................................................................... 31 3.4.2.3 Black Sea Bass (Centropristis striata) ........................................................................................ 31 3.4.2.4 Bluefish (Pomatomus saltatrix) ................................................................................................... 32 3.4.2.5 Scup (Stenotomus chrysops) ...................................................................................................... 33 3.4.2.6 Summer Flounder (Paralichthys dentatus) ................................................................................. 34 3.4.3 Invertebrate Species ........................................................................................................................... 35 3.4.3.1 Atlantic Sea Scallop (Placopecten magellanicus) ....................................................................... 35 3.4.3.2 Longfin Inshore Squid (Loligo pealeii) ......................................................................................... 36 3.4.3.3 Northern Shortfin Squid (Illex illecebrosus) ................................................................................. 37 3.4.3.4 Ocean Quahog (Arctica islandica) .............................................................................................. 37 3.4.3.5 Surf Clam (Spisula solidissima) .................................................................................................. 37 3.4.4 Highly Migratory Species ..................................................................................................................... 38 3.4.4.1 Bluefin Tuna (Thunnus thynnus) ................................................................................................. 38 3.4.4.2 Yellowfin Tuna (Thunnus albacares) .......................................................................................... 39 3.4.4.3 Skipjack Tuna (Katsuwonus pelamis) ......................................................................................... 39 3.4.4.4 Swordfish (Xiphias gladius) ......................................................................................................... 39 3.4.5 Coastal Migratory Pelagic Species ...................................................................................................... 40 3.4.5.1 Cobia (Rachycentron canadum) ................................................................................................. 40 3.4.5.2 King Mackerel (Scomberomorus cavalla) ................................................................................... 40 3.4.5.3 Spanish Mackerel (Scomberomorus maculatus) ........................................................................ 41 3.4.6 Skate Species ..................................................................................................................................... 42 3.4.6.1 Clearnose Skate (Raja eglanteria) .............................................................................................. 42 3.4.6.2 Little Skate (Leucoraja erinacea) ................................................................................................ 42 3.4.6.3 Winter Skate (Leucoraja ocellata) ............................................................................................... 43 3.4.7 Shark Species ..................................................................................................................................... 43 3.4.7.1 Atlantic Angel Shark (Squatina dumeril) ..................................................................................... 43 3.4.7.2 Atlantic sharpnose shark (Rhizopriondon terraenovae) .............................................................. 43 3.4.7.3 Basking Shark (Cetorhinus maximus) ......................................................................................... 44 3.4.7.4 Blue Shark (Prionace glauca) ..................................................................................................... 44 3.4.7.5 Common Thresher Shark (Alopias vulpinus) .............................................................................. 45 3.4.7.6 Dusky shark (Carcharhinus obscurus) ........................................................................................ 45 3.4.7.7 Sand Tiger Shark (Carcharias taurus) ........................................................................................ 46 Page 3/103 3.4.7.8 Sandbar Shark (Carcharhinus plumbeus) ................................................................................... 46 3.4.7.9 Shortfin Mako Shark (Isurus oxyrinchus) .................................................................................... 47 3.4.7.10 Smoothhound Shark Complex (Atlantic stock; Smooth Dogfish (Mustelus canis)) ..................... 48 3.4.7.11 Spiny Dogfish (Squalus acanthias) ............................................................................................. 48 3.4.7.12 Tiger Shark (Galeocerdo cuvieri) ................................................................................................ 49 3.4.7.13
Recommended publications
  • Long Island Sound Habitat Restoration Initiative

    Long Island Sound Habitat Restoration Initiative

    LONG ISLAND SOUND HABITAT RESTORATION INITIATIVE Technical Support for Coastal Habitat Restoration FEBRUARY 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ....................................................................i GUIDING PRINCIPLES.................................................................................. ii PROJECT BOUNDARY.................................................................................. iv SITE IDENTIFICATION AND RANKING........................................................... iv LITERATURE CITED ..................................................................................... vi ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS............................................................................... vi APPENDIX I-A: RANKING CRITERIA .....................................................................I-A-1 SECTION 1: TIDAL WETLANDS ................................................1-1 DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................. 1-1 Salt Marshes ....................................................................................................1-1 Brackish Marshes .............................................................................................1-3 Tidal Fresh Marshes .........................................................................................1-4 VALUES AND FUNCTIONS ........................................................................... 1-4 STATUS AND TRENDS ................................................................................
  • A Practical Handbook for Determining the Ages of Gulf of Mexico And

    A Practical Handbook for Determining the Ages of Gulf of Mexico And

    A Practical Handbook for Determining the Ages of Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic Coast Fishes THIRD EDITION GSMFC No. 300 NOVEMBER 2020 i Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission Commissioners and Proxies ALABAMA Senator R.L. “Bret” Allain, II Chris Blankenship, Commissioner State Senator District 21 Alabama Department of Conservation Franklin, Louisiana and Natural Resources John Roussel Montgomery, Alabama Zachary, Louisiana Representative Chris Pringle Mobile, Alabama MISSISSIPPI Chris Nelson Joe Spraggins, Executive Director Bon Secour Fisheries, Inc. Mississippi Department of Marine Bon Secour, Alabama Resources Biloxi, Mississippi FLORIDA Read Hendon Eric Sutton, Executive Director USM/Gulf Coast Research Laboratory Florida Fish and Wildlife Ocean Springs, Mississippi Conservation Commission Tallahassee, Florida TEXAS Representative Jay Trumbull Carter Smith, Executive Director Tallahassee, Florida Texas Parks and Wildlife Department Austin, Texas LOUISIANA Doug Boyd Jack Montoucet, Secretary Boerne, Texas Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries Baton Rouge, Louisiana GSMFC Staff ASMFC Staff Mr. David M. Donaldson Mr. Bob Beal Executive Director Executive Director Mr. Steven J. VanderKooy Mr. Jeffrey Kipp IJF Program Coordinator Stock Assessment Scientist Ms. Debora McIntyre Dr. Kristen Anstead IJF Staff Assistant Fisheries Scientist ii A Practical Handbook for Determining the Ages of Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic Coast Fishes Third Edition Edited by Steve VanderKooy Jessica Carroll Scott Elzey Jessica Gilmore Jeffrey Kipp Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission 2404 Government St Ocean Springs, MS 39564 and Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission 1050 N. Highland Street Suite 200 A-N Arlington, VA 22201 Publication Number 300 November 2020 A publication of the Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission pursuant to National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Award Number NA15NMF4070076 and NA15NMF4720399.
  • Fronts in the World Ocean's Large Marine Ecosystems. ICES CM 2007

    Fronts in the World Ocean's Large Marine Ecosystems. ICES CM 2007

    - 1 - This paper can be freely cited without prior reference to the authors International Council ICES CM 2007/D:21 for the Exploration Theme Session D: Comparative Marine Ecosystem of the Sea (ICES) Structure and Function: Descriptors and Characteristics Fronts in the World Ocean’s Large Marine Ecosystems Igor M. Belkin and Peter C. Cornillon Abstract. Oceanic fronts shape marine ecosystems; therefore front mapping and characterization is one of the most important aspects of physical oceanography. Here we report on the first effort to map and describe all major fronts in the World Ocean’s Large Marine Ecosystems (LMEs). Apart from a geographical review, these fronts are classified according to their origin and physical mechanisms that maintain them. This first-ever zero-order pattern of the LME fronts is based on a unique global frontal data base assembled at the University of Rhode Island. Thermal fronts were automatically derived from 12 years (1985-1996) of twice-daily satellite 9-km resolution global AVHRR SST fields with the Cayula-Cornillon front detection algorithm. These frontal maps serve as guidance in using hydrographic data to explore subsurface thermohaline fronts, whose surface thermal signatures have been mapped from space. Our most recent study of chlorophyll fronts in the Northwest Atlantic from high-resolution 1-km data (Belkin and O’Reilly, 2007) revealed a close spatial association between chlorophyll fronts and SST fronts, suggesting causative links between these two types of fronts. Keywords: Fronts; Large Marine Ecosystems; World Ocean; sea surface temperature. Igor M. Belkin: Graduate School of Oceanography, University of Rhode Island, 215 South Ferry Road, Narragansett, Rhode Island 02882, USA [tel.: +1 401 874 6533, fax: +1 874 6728, email: [email protected]].
  • CHECKLIST and BIOGEOGRAPHY of FISHES from GUADALUPE ISLAND, WESTERN MEXICO Héctor Reyes-Bonilla, Arturo Ayala-Bocos, Luis E

    CHECKLIST and BIOGEOGRAPHY of FISHES from GUADALUPE ISLAND, WESTERN MEXICO Héctor Reyes-Bonilla, Arturo Ayala-Bocos, Luis E

    ReyeS-BONIllA eT Al: CheCklIST AND BIOgeOgRAphy Of fISheS fROm gUADAlUpe ISlAND CalCOfI Rep., Vol. 51, 2010 CHECKLIST AND BIOGEOGRAPHY OF FISHES FROM GUADALUPE ISLAND, WESTERN MEXICO Héctor REyES-BONILLA, Arturo AyALA-BOCOS, LUIS E. Calderon-AGUILERA SAúL GONzáLEz-Romero, ISRAEL SáNCHEz-ALCántara Centro de Investigación Científica y de Educación Superior de Ensenada AND MARIANA Walther MENDOzA Carretera Tijuana - Ensenada # 3918, zona Playitas, C.P. 22860 Universidad Autónoma de Baja California Sur Ensenada, B.C., México Departamento de Biología Marina Tel: +52 646 1750500, ext. 25257; Fax: +52 646 Apartado postal 19-B, CP 23080 [email protected] La Paz, B.C.S., México. Tel: (612) 123-8800, ext. 4160; Fax: (612) 123-8819 NADIA C. Olivares-BAñUELOS [email protected] Reserva de la Biosfera Isla Guadalupe Comisión Nacional de áreas Naturales Protegidas yULIANA R. BEDOLLA-GUzMáN AND Avenida del Puerto 375, local 30 Arturo RAMíREz-VALDEz Fraccionamiento Playas de Ensenada, C.P. 22880 Universidad Autónoma de Baja California Ensenada, B.C., México Facultad de Ciencias Marinas, Instituto de Investigaciones Oceanológicas Universidad Autónoma de Baja California, Carr. Tijuana-Ensenada km. 107, Apartado postal 453, C.P. 22890 Ensenada, B.C., México ABSTRACT recognized the biological and ecological significance of Guadalupe Island, off Baja California, México, is Guadalupe Island, and declared it a Biosphere Reserve an important fishing area which also harbors high (SEMARNAT 2005). marine biodiversity. Based on field data, literature Guadalupe Island is isolated, far away from the main- reviews, and scientific collection records, we pres- land and has limited logistic facilities to conduct scien- ent a comprehensive checklist of the local fish fauna, tific studies.
  • Striped Bass Morone Saxatilis

    Striped Bass Morone Saxatilis

    COSEWIC Assessment and Status Report on the Striped Bass Morone saxatilis in Canada Southern Gulf of St. Lawrence Population St. Lawrence Estuary Population Bay of Fundy Population SOUTHERN GULF OF ST. LAWRENCE POPULATION - THREATENED ST. LAWRENCE ESTUARY POPULATION - EXTIRPATED BAY OF FUNDY POPULATION - THREATENED 2004 COSEWIC COSEPAC COMMITTEE ON THE STATUS OF COMITÉ SUR LA SITUATION ENDANGERED WILDLIFE DES ESPÈCES EN PÉRIL IN CANADA AU CANADA COSEWIC status reports are working documents used in assigning the status of wildlife species suspected of being at risk. This report may be cited as follows: COSEWIC 2004. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the Striped Bass Morone saxatilis in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. vii + 43 pp. (www.sararegistry.gc.ca/status/status_e.cfm) Production note: COSEWIC would like to acknowledge Jean Robitaille for writing the status report on the Striped Bass Morone saxatilis prepared under contract with Environment Canada, overseen and edited by Claude Renaud the COSEWIC Freshwater Fish Species Specialist Subcommittee Co-chair. For additional copies contact: COSEWIC Secretariat c/o Canadian Wildlife Service Environment Canada Ottawa, ON K1A 0H3 Tel.: (819) 997-4991 / (819) 953-3215 Fax: (819) 994-3684 E-mail: COSEWIC/[email protected] http://www.cosewic.gc.ca Ếgalement disponible en français sous le titre Ếvaluation et Rapport de situation du COSEPAC sur la situation de bar rayé (Morone saxatilis) au Canada. Cover illustration: Striped Bass — Drawing from Scott and Crossman, 1973. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada 2004 Catalogue No. CW69-14/421-2005E-PDF ISBN 0-662-39840-8 HTML: CW69-14/421-2005E-HTML 0-662-39841-6 Recycled paper COSEWIC Assessment Summary Assessment Summary – November 2004 Common name Striped Bass (Southern Gulf of St.
  • Early Stages of Fishes in the Western North Atlantic Ocean Volume

    Early Stages of Fishes in the Western North Atlantic Ocean Volume

    ISBN 0-9689167-4-x Early Stages of Fishes in the Western North Atlantic Ocean (Davis Strait, Southern Greenland and Flemish Cap to Cape Hatteras) Volume One Acipenseriformes through Syngnathiformes Michael P. Fahay ii Early Stages of Fishes in the Western North Atlantic Ocean iii Dedication This monograph is dedicated to those highly skilled larval fish illustrators whose talents and efforts have greatly facilitated the study of fish ontogeny. The works of many of those fine illustrators grace these pages. iv Early Stages of Fishes in the Western North Atlantic Ocean v Preface The contents of this monograph are a revision and update of an earlier atlas describing the eggs and larvae of western Atlantic marine fishes occurring between the Scotian Shelf and Cape Hatteras, North Carolina (Fahay, 1983). The three-fold increase in the total num- ber of species covered in the current compilation is the result of both a larger study area and a recent increase in published ontogenetic studies of fishes by many authors and students of the morphology of early stages of marine fishes. It is a tribute to the efforts of those authors that the ontogeny of greater than 70% of species known from the western North Atlantic Ocean is now well described. Michael Fahay 241 Sabino Road West Bath, Maine 04530 U.S.A. vi Acknowledgements I greatly appreciate the help provided by a number of very knowledgeable friends and colleagues dur- ing the preparation of this monograph. Jon Hare undertook a painstakingly critical review of the entire monograph, corrected omissions, inconsistencies, and errors of fact, and made suggestions which markedly improved its organization and presentation.
  • Final Biological Assessment for Roseate Tern, New

    Final Biological Assessment for Roseate Tern, New

    FINAL BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT for the ROSEATE TERN NEW BEDFORD HARBOR – SOUTH TERMINAL PROJECT NEW BEDFORD, MASSACHUSETTS U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Ecosystem Protection (OEP05-2)) U.S. EPA New England Region 5 Post Office Square, Suite 100 Boston, MA 02109-3912 July 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS Subject Page I. Introduction 3 II. Description of Project and Action Area 4 A. Project Description 4 B. Action Area 6 III. Environmental Setting 6 A. Flora - Salt Marsh, Intertidal and Subtidal Resources 6 B. Fauna – Finfish and Shellfish 7 C. Physical Conditions – Sediments, Patterns of Circulation, Noise 11 IV. Roseate Tern Biology 12 A. Seasonal Distribution 12 B. Nesting 12 C. Staging 14 D. Foraging 14 V. Effects Analysis 17 A. Direct Loss of Salt Marsh, Intertidal and Subtidal habitat 17 B. Foraging by Nesting/Migrating Terns 18 C. Effects on Prey Species In Shallow Water Habitat 18 D. Dredging Impacts to Prey Fish in Sub-tidal Environment 19 E. Noise and Traffic 20 F. Oil Spills and Shipping Traffic 21 G. Ecological Benefits of the Project 22 VI. Determination of Effects on the Roseate Tern 22 VII Conclusion 23 VIII. References. 24 IX. List of Contacts Made and Preparers 28 2 New Bedford Harbor - South Terminal Project Endangered Species Act Biological Assessment for the Roseate Tern I. Introduction This Biological Assessment (BA) was prepared to comply with Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA). It assesses the potential effects of the construction and long-term operation of the proposed New Bedford Harbor (NBH) - South Terminal project in New Bedford, MA, on the roseate tern (Sterna dougallii), a federally listed as endangered which may occur in the area of the proposed project.1 While New Bedford Harbor is not federally designated critical habitat for any federally endangered species, the project area provides potential habitat for nesting and foraging for the roseate tern.
  • Seasonal and Size-Based Predation on Two Species of Squid by Four Fish

    Seasonal and Size-Based Predation on Two Species of Squid by Four Fish

    605 Abstract-Longfin inshore (Loligo Seasonal and size-based predation on pealeii) and northern shortfin (lllex illecebrosus) squids are considered two species of squid by four fish predators important prey species in the North­ west Atlantic shelf ecosystem. The on the Northwest Atlantic continental shelf diets of four major squid predators, bluefish (Pomatomus saltatrix), goose­ Michelle D. Staudinger fish (Lophius americanus), silver hake (Merluccius bilinearis), and summer Department of Natural Resources Conservation flounder (Paralichthys dentatus), were 160 Holdsworth Way examined for seasonal and size-based University of Massachusetts, Amherst changes in feeding habits. Summer Amherst, Massachusetts 01003-9285 and winter, two time periods largely Email address: [email protected] absent from previous evaluations, were found to be the most impor­ tant seasons for predation on squid, and are also the periods when the majority of squid are landed by the regional fishery. Bluefish >450 mm, silver hake >300 mm, and summer Global depletion of marine predators significant predators of squid (Bow­ flounder >400 mm were all found has had dramatic effects on ecosys­ man et al., 2000). Squid represented to be significant predators of squid. tem structure and function (May et between 17% and 95% of the total These same size fish correspond to al., 1979; Jackson et al., 2001; Pauly mass consumed by these four finfish age classes currently targeted for et al., 2002). In many systems, the regionally. Dramatic changes in stock biomass expansion by management ramifications of such changes may not abundance and population structure committees. This study highlights be fully realized. Groundfish declines have occurred since specimens for the importance of understanding how have been linked to simultaneous Bowman et al.'s study were collect­ squid and predator interactions vary increases in cephalopod landings temporally and with changes in com­ ed 25-45 years ago.
  • Venezuela Location Geography Food

    Venezuela Location Geography Food

    Venezuela Location Venezuela, officially the Republic of Venezuela, is a republic (1995 est. pop. 21,005,000), 352,143 sq mi. (912,050 sq. km), in the northern part of South America. With the Caribbean Sea in the north, Venezuela has a coastline of 1,750 long. It is bordered on the south by Brazil, on the west and southwest by Colombia, and on the east by Guyana. Dependencies include Margarita Island, Tortuga Island, and many smaller island groups in the Caribbean. Caracas is the capital and also the largest city in Venezuela. Geography Venezuela, a third larger than Texas, occupies most of the northern coast of South America on the Caribbean Sea. Mountain systems break Venezuela into four distinct areas: (1) the Maracaibo lowlands; (2) the mountainous region in the north and northwest; (3) the Orinoco basin, with the llanos (vast grass-covered plains) on its northern border and great forest areas in the south and southeast, and (4) the Guiana Highlands, south of the Orinoco, accounting for nearly half the national territory. Food The food in Venezuela is generally easy and flavorful. Caracas, the capital of Venezuela, claims to have a greater variety of restaurants than any other South American city, and it would certainly be a pleasure to try and prove it, even if you failed. Venezuelan cooking has European, indigenous, and African roots – a heterodox cuisine formed over the centuries by immigrants. Some of the native dishes include: Page 1 of 7 - Pabellon - stewed and shredded meat accompanied by rice, black beans, and baban -Hallaca - a traditional Christmas dish.
  • Success and Growth of Corals Transplanted to Cement Armor Mat Tiles in Southeast Florida: Implications for Reef Restoration S

    Success and Growth of Corals Transplanted to Cement Armor Mat Tiles in Southeast Florida: Implications for Reef Restoration S

    Nova Southeastern University NSUWorks Marine & Environmental Sciences Faculty Department of Marine and Environmental Sciences Proceedings, Presentations, Speeches, Lectures 2000 Success and Growth of Corals Transplanted to Cement Armor Mat Tiles in Southeast Florida: Implications for Reef Restoration S. L. Thornton Hazen and Sawyer, Environmental Engineers and Scientists Richard E. Dodge Nova Southeastern University, [email protected] David S. Gilliam Nova Southeastern University, [email protected] R. DeVictor Hazen and Sawyer, Environmental Engineers and Scientists P. Cooke Hazen and Sawyer, Environmental Engineers and Scientists Follow this and additional works at: https://nsuworks.nova.edu/occ_facpresentations Part of the Marine Biology Commons, and the Oceanography and Atmospheric Sciences and Meteorology Commons NSUWorks Citation Thornton, S. L.; Dodge, Richard E.; Gilliam, David S.; DeVictor, R.; and Cooke, P., "Success and Growth of Corals Transplanted to Cement Armor Mat Tiles in Southeast Florida: Implications for Reef Restoration" (2000). Marine & Environmental Sciences Faculty Proceedings, Presentations, Speeches, Lectures. 39. https://nsuworks.nova.edu/occ_facpresentations/39 This Conference Proceeding is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Marine and Environmental Sciences at NSUWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Marine & Environmental Sciences Faculty Proceedings, Presentations, Speeches, Lectures by an authorized administrator of NSUWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Proceedings 9" International Coral Reef Symposium, Bali, Indonesia 23-27 October 2000, Vol.2 Success and growth of corals transplanted to cement armor mat tiles in southeast Florida: implications for reef restoration ' S.L. Thornton, R.E. Dodge t , D.S. Gilliam , R. DeVictor and P. Cooke ABSTRACT In 1997, 271 scleractinian corals growing on a sewer outfall pipe were used in a transplantation study offshore from North Dade County, Florida, USA.
  • Reconstruction of Original Body Size and Estimation of Allometric

    Reconstruction of Original Body Size and Estimation of Allometric

    101 Reconstruction of original body size tie length in squid) in population and other types of surveys, information and estimation of allometric relationships on total length may not always be for the Iongtin inshore squid <Loligo pealeit1 readily available. Therefore, knowl­ edge of allometric relationships may and northern shortfin squid (///ex il/ecebrosus> be useful to. accurately assess trophic interactions and predator-prey rela­ Michelle D. Staudinger' tionships. For the majority of ceph­ alopod species, there are currently 1 Francis Juanes no predictive equations to estimate Suzanne Carlson2 total length from mantle length and Email address for contact author: [email protected] to account for variability in growth. 1 Department of Natural Resources Conservation To improve descriptions of the feed­ University of Massachusetts Amherst ing habits of teuthophagous preda­ Amherst, Massachusetts, 01003-9285 tors and to increase the number of 2 School of Natural Science evaluations of size-based predation Hampshire CoRege on cephalopod prey we present 1) pre­ Amherst, Massachusetts, 01002 dictive equations for reconstructing original prey size and 2) allometric relationships of mantle length to total body length for the two most common species of cephalopods in the Northwest Atlantic Ocean, L. pealeii Quantification of predator-prey body mammals (Gannon et al., 1997; Wil­ and I. illecebrosus. size relationships is essential to under­ liams, 1999). standing trophic dynamics in marine As with the bones and otoliths of ecosystems. Prey lengths recovered prey fish, cephalopod beaks are often Materials and methods from predator stomachs help deter­ recovered from predator stomachs mine the sizes of prey most influential and may be used for identification of Loligo pealeii were collected by otter in supporting predator growth and prey species and the reconstruction trawl from coastal waters off Mas­ to ascertain size-specific effects of of original prey body size (Clarke, sachusetts during the months of May natural mortality on prey populations 1986).
  • A Brief History of the Passamaquoddy Indians

    A Brief History of the Passamaquoddy Indians

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of Maine The University of Maine DigitalCommons@UMaine Maine History Documents Special Collections 1977 A Brief History of the Passamaquoddy Indians Susan M. Stevens Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/mainehistory Part of the History Commons This Essay is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UMaine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Maine History Documents by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UMaine. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Revised 1/77 A BRIEF HISTORY Pamp 4401 of the c.l PASSAMAQUODDY INDIANS By Susan M. Stevens - 1972 The Passamaquoddy Indians of Maine are located today on two State Reservations about 50 miles apart. One is on Passamaquoddy Bay, near Eastport (Pleasant Point Reservation); the other is near Princeton, Maine in a woods and lake region (Indian Township Reservation). Populations vary with seasonal jobs, but Pleasant Point averages about 400-450 residents and Indian Township averages about 300- 350 residents. If all known Passamaquoddies both on and off the reservations were counted, they would number around 1300. The Passamaquoddy speak a language of the larger Algonkian stock, known as Passamaquoddy-Malecite. The Malecite of New Brunswick are their close relatives and speak a slightly different dialect. The Micmacs in Nova Scotia speak the next most related language, but the difference is great enough to cause difficulty in understanding. The Passamaquoddy were members at one time of the Wabanaki (or Abnaki) Confederacy, which included most of Maine, New Hampshire, and Maritime Indians.