DOCSLIB.ORG

Daily English Vocab Emergency Should Never Be Forgotten

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Daily English Vocab Emergency Should Never Be Forgotten Daily English Vocab PDF 26th June 2017 Emergency should never be forgotten Strange that in the process of selecting who should be the next President of India, the nation has forgotten the emergency imposed some forty two years ago. More than one lakh people were detained without trial. The media which could have reported the conditions prevailing was muzzled (म ुँह बंद करना या होना). Civil servants dutifully issued orders, which came through Sanjay Gandhi, the son of then Prime Minister Indira Gandhi, who was the extra constitutional authority ruling the country in her name. The judiciary caved in and even upheld that Parliament could suspend the fundamental rights enshrined in the Constitution. Even the imposition of the emergency was justified. Only one judge, Justice H.R. Khanna, gave a dissenting judgment but he was superseded (हटा देना). It is another matter that the country punished Indira Gandhi, when she was ousted (बेदखल करना) from power, lock, stock and barrel, after elections were held. Similar was the fate of her son. What disappoints me is that the Supreme Court never passed a resolution or has done anything to register its disagreement with the judgment which gave the judiciary a bad name. Even now it is not too late. The Supreme Court has liberal judges on the bench. They can still dilute the situation by passing a resolution that its predecessor bench was wrong in endorsing (समर्थन करना) the emergency. At least the cabinet of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, with a lawyer minister in Arun Jaitley, should say sorry on behalf of the government for the excesses committed by its predecessor during the emergency. The then Attorney General, Niren De, had argued in the court that even the right to live was forfeited (अधिकार खो देना) during the dark days of the emergency. There was so much fear that practically all lawyers in Delhi dared not to speak. Lawyers like Soli Sorabjee from Mumbai and V.M. Tarkunde from Delhi argued the habeas corpus petitions filed by my wife on my detention (नजरबꅍदी). Still I spent three months in jail. The two judges, Justice S. Rangarajan and Justice R.N. Aggarwal, who gave the judgment, were punished for having given the verdict. The first was transferred to Guwahati where people still remember him for his impartiality. The second was demoted (पदावनत करना) and sent back to the Sessions Court. But this did not deter them and they carried on their work independently. Probably, the pressure on the judges has lessened in recent years because of a vigilant (सतकथ ) media. But worse is happening. Appointments to the benches are being made according to the wishes of rulers. It began with the Congress government and has continued even during the Bhartiya Janata Party government. The process was really started by Indira Gandhi. She superseded three judges - Justices J.M. Shelat, K.S. Hegde and A.N. Grover - to appoint Justice A.N. Ray as the Chief Justice. She was unseated from parliament and disqualified for poll malpractices for six years. Instead of accepting the verdict, she imposed the emergency and amended the law itself. The excesses Indira and Sanjay Gandhi committed during the emergency may be a part of history they are recalled by not only those who suffered but also those who support democracy. It was the Janata Party which came to power after defeating Mrs Gandhi that changed the Constitution to make the imposition of the emergency impossible. And Justice Khanna’s dissenting judgment - that the basic structure of the constitution cannot be changed - was accepted as the norm. This has ensured the parliamentary system of governance and has deterred every ruler since then not to tinker with (To make unskilled or experimental efforts at repairing or improving something) the judiciary. Ultimately, the independence of the judiciary depends upon the quality of judges and this is where I have some doubts. In the US, the biggest democracy, the Supreme Court is divided between Republican and Democrat judges. But since the tenure of the judges is for life, the appointees of one party rise above their old loyalties and become independent and impartial. In India, we had the best of judges when the government appointed them. But now party politics is creeping in and at least in High Courts it is seen that the party in power has not appointed the best of lawyers but those who owe allegiance (धनष्ठा) to it. Even in the Supreme Court, some appointments come under the shadow of doubt. Take the case of former Solicitor General Gopal Subramanium whose appointment to the Supreme Court was stalled by the Narendra Modi government. Blaming the government for blocking his appointment, Subramanium said his “independence as a lawyer is causing apprehensions that I will not toe the line of the government. This factor has been decisive in refusing to appoint me.” He subsequently withdrew from the race. In fact, it was at his instance that the Gujarat police was forced to book a murder case in the Sohrabuddin fake encounter matter. When the prime witness, Tulsiram Prajapati, was liquidated under suspicious circumstances, Subramanium had recommended the transfer of the case to the CBI. Significantly, Subramanium also admitted that it was on his suggestion that the Supreme Court, while granting bail to accused Amit Shah, now the BJP president, had barred him from entering Gujarat. Most pathetic was the role of the media. I recall that when the emergency was imposed there was anger and more than a hundred journalists assembled at the Press Club at my bidding to condemn the act. But when I tried to pick up the thread after my detention, there was hardly anyone to support me. Indira Gandhi had created so much of fear in the minds of journalists that they were more worried about their jobs than the freedom of the press, which they otherwise cherished. Courtesy: The Statesman (Nostalgic) 1. Muzzle (verb): Prevent (a person or group) from expressing their opinions freely. (म ुँह बंद करना या होना) Synonyms: Gag, Silence, Censor, Suppress, Stifle, Inhibit, Restrain. Antonyms: Support, Encourage, Motivate. Example: In a tyranny, the democratic voices are generally suppressed. Verb forms: Muzzle, Muzzled, Muzzled. 2. Supersede (verb): Take the place of (a person or thing previously in authority or use). (हटा देना) (का र्ान ले लेना) Synonyms: Replace, Supplant, Substitute For, Displace. Antonyms: Keep, Stay, Retain, Hold. Example: The Supreme court decision will supersede the decision of the lower court. Verb forms: Supersede, Superseded, Superseded. Related words: Supersession (noun) - Act of replacing one person or thing by another especially one held to be superior Origin: from Latin supersedere ‘be superior to’, from super- ‘above’ + sedere ‘sit’. 3. Oust (verb): Drive out or expel (someone) from a position or place. (बेदखल करना) Synonyms: Drive Out, Expel, Force Out, Throw Out, Remove, Remove From Office/Power, Unseat, Depose. Antonyms: Hire, Place, Take In, Give, Hold, Keep. Example: Board members realized that they would have to have at least a 2/3 vote to oust the horrible president. Verb forms: Oust, Ousted, Ousted. 4. Endorse (verb): To express one’s support or approval. (समर्थन करना) Synonyms: Support, Espouse, Back, Ratify. Antonyms: Disapprove, Disagree, Oppose, Dissuade. Example: During the election, several celebrities held fundraising events to endorse their favorite candidates. Verb Forms: Endorse, Endorsed, Endorsed. Related Words: Endorsement (noun) - अनुमोदन Origin: from Latin indorsare, from Latin in- ‘in, on’ + dorsum ‘back’. 5. Forfeit (verb): Lose or be deprived of (property or a right or privilege) as a penalty for wrongdoing./ lose or give up (something) as a necessary consequence of something else. (अधिकार खो देना) Synonyms: Surrender, Relinquish, Give Up, Renounce, Be Deprived Of, Lose. Antonyms: Hold, Sty, Remain, Retain. Example: Henry will forfeit many of his expensive belongings before he files bankruptcy. Verb forms: Forfeit, Forfeited, Forfeited. 6. Detention (noun): The action of detaining someone or the state of being detained in official custody. (नजरबꅍदी) Synonyms: Immurement, Imprisonment, Incarceration, Internment. Antonyms: Freedom, Liberation, Release. Example: The alleged men were kept in detention over security purposes. Verb forms: Detain, Detained, Detained. Related words: Detain (verb) - To hold or keep in or as if in custody. Origin: from Latin detinere ‘hold back’. 7. Demote (verb): Move (someone) to a lower position or rank (पदावनत करना) Synonyms: Downgrade, Relegate, Declass, Lower In Rank, Reduce In Rank. Antonyms: Promote, Elevate, Upgrade. Example: Although he has proved his efficacy in his work, he was demoted. Verb forms: Demote, Demoted, Demoted. Origin: from English de- ‘down’ + a shortened form of promote. 8. Vigilant (adjective): Keeping careful watch for possible danger or difficulties. (सतकथ ) Synonyms: Argus-Eyed, Attentive, Observant, Open-Eyed, Alert, Watchful. Antonyms: Careless, Heedless, Ignorant, Inattentive, Incautious, Indiscreet. Example: Although this highway is a beautiful drive, you have to stay vigilant for deer and other animals in the road. 9. Tinker with (Phrasal verb): (To make unskilled or experimental efforts at repairing or improving something). (ठीक करना/मर륍मत करना) Synonyms: Mend, Improve, Repair, Reform, Darn. Antonyms: Damage, Destruct, Harm, Hurt. Example: He tinkered with the engine all day but it still wouldn't start. Verb forms: Tinker with, Tinkered with, Tinkered with. 10. Allegiance (noun): Loyalty or commitment to a superior or
Load more

Recommended publications
  • June Ank 2016
    The Specter of Emergency Continues to Haunt the Country Mahi Pal Singh Forty one years ago this country witnessed people had been detained without trial under the the darkest chapter in the history of indepen- repressive Maintenance of Internal Security Act dent and democratic India when the state of (MISA), several high courts had given relief to emergency was proclaimed on the midnight of the detainees by accepting their right to life and 25th-26th June 1975 by Indira Gandhi, the then personal liberty granted under Article 21 and ac- Prime Minister of the country, only to satisfy cepting their writs for habeas corpus as per pow- her lust for power. The emergency was declared ers granted to them under Article 226 of the In- when Justice Jagmohanlal Sinha of the dian constitution. This issue was at the heart of Allahabad High Court invalidated her election the case of the Additional District Magistrate of to the Lok Sabha in June 1975, upholding Jabalpur v. Shiv Kant Shukla, popularly known charges of electoral fraud, in the case filed by as the Habeas Corpus case, which came up for Raj Narain, her rival candidate. The logical fol- hearing in front of the Supreme Court in Decem- low up action in any democratic country should ber 1975. Given the important nature of the case, have been for the Prime Minister indicted in the a bench comprising the five senior-most judges case to resign. Instead, she chose to impose was convened to hear the case. emergency in the country, suspend fundamen- During the arguments, Justice H.R.
    [Show full text]
  • The Indian Police Journal Vol
    Vol. 63 No. 2-3 ISSN 0537-2429 April-September, 2016 The Indian Police Journal Vol. 63 • No. 2-3 • April-Septermber, 2016 BOARD OF REVIEWERS 1. Shri R.K. Raghavan, IPS(Retd.) 13. Prof. Ajay Kumar Jain Former Director, CBI B-1, Scholar Building, Management Development Institute, Mehrauli Road, 2. Shri. P.M. Nair Sukrali Chair Prof. TISS, Mumbai 14. Shri Balwinder Singh 3. Shri Vijay Raghawan Former Special Director, CBI Prof. TISS, Mumbai Former Secretary, CVC 4. Shri N. Ramachandran 15. Shri Nand Kumar Saravade President, Indian Police Foundation. CEO, Data Security Council of India New Delhi-110017 16. Shri M.L. Sharma 5. Prof. (Dr.) Arvind Verma Former Director, CBI Dept. of Criminal Justice, Indiana University, 17. Shri S. Balaji Bloomington, IN 47405 USA Former Spl. DG, NIA 6. Dr. Trinath Mishra, IPS(Retd.) 18. Prof. N. Bala Krishnan Ex. Director, CBI Hony. Professor Ex. DG, CRPF, Ex. DG, CISF Super Computer Education Research Centre, Indian Institute of Science, 7. Prof. V.S. Mani Bengaluru Former Prof. JNU 19. Dr. Lalji Singh 8. Shri Rakesh Jaruhar MD, Genome Foundation, Former Spl. DG, CRPF Hyderabad-500003 20. Shri R.C. Arora 9. Shri Salim Ali DG(Retd.) Former Director (R&D), Former Spl. Director, CBI BPR&D 10. Shri Sanjay Singh, IPS 21. Prof. Upneet Lalli IGP-I, CID, West Bengal Dy. Director, RICA, Chandigarh 11. Dr. K.P.C. Gandhi 22. Prof. (Retd.) B.K. Nagla Director of AP Forensic Science Labs Former Professor 12. Dr. J.R. Gaur, 23 Dr. A.K. Saxena Former Director, FSL, Shimla (H.P.) Former Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Economy Outlook Still Cloudy an Immediate Stimulus Is Needed to Regain the Momentum to Get India Back to 8% Growth ‘Make in India’, Reforms for Improv- Strong Rupee
    https://telegram.me/TheHindu_Zone https://telegram.me/PDF4EXAMS EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE NOIDA/DELHI THE HINDU 8 EDITORIAL MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 4, 2017 EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE Economy outlook still cloudy An immediate stimulus is needed to regain the momentum to get India back to 8% growth ‘Make in India’, reforms for improv- strong rupee. It’s no use saying that ing ‘Ease of Doing Business’, in- since India is a net importing coun- creased access to electricity, im- try, our exchange rate should be provement in infrastructure and stronger. If we remove gold im- Perform or perish private investment are not picking ports, a large part of which is not A Cabinet reshue that was unusually up. This must become the big prior- for consumption but as store of ity. Initiatives such as Housing For value, then our trade decit will be ajit ranade free from political
    [Show full text]
  • An Institutional Alchemy: India's Two Parliaments in Comparative Context Shubhankar Dam
    Brooklyn Journal of International Law Volume 39 | Issue 2 Article 2 2014 An Institutional Alchemy: India's Two Parliaments in Comparative Context Shubhankar Dam Follow this and additional works at: https://brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/bjil Recommended Citation Shubhankar Dam, An Institutional Alchemy: India's Two Parliaments in Comparative Context, 39 Brook. J. Int'l L. (2014). Available at: https://brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/bjil/vol39/iss2/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at BrooklynWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Brooklyn Journal of International Law by an authorized editor of BrooklynWorks. AN INSTITUTIONAL ALCHEMY: INDIA’S TWO PARLIAMENTS IN COMPARATIVE CONTEXT Shubhankar Dam* INTRODUCTION: THE PRESIDENT AS THE SOLE LEGISLATOR yoti Singh Pandey, a twenty-three-year-old physiotherapy Jintern, was gang raped in New Delhi on December 16, 2012.1 Six men were involved, one of them a teenager. Their assault left Jyoti with grave injuries to her abdomen, intes- tines, and genitals.2 The teenager was the most ferocious of the six men. He raped his victim twice and “ripped out her intes- tines with his bare hands.”3 This display of hypersexualized * Shubhankar Dam, Assistant Professor of Law, Singapore Management University School of Law; LL.M. (Harvard); B.C.L. (Oxon). Former law clerk to Hon. Mr. V. N. Khare, Chief Justice of India, Indian Supreme Court. SMU Office of Research provided funding for this paper. Versions of this Article were presented at the Boston Law and Society Annual Meeting 2013 and the Inaugural Young Scholars Workshop on Socio-legal Studies, National Uni- versity Singapore Law Faculty, 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • Justice at Heart Life Journey of Justice V.R
    Justice at Heart Life Journey of Justice V.R. Krishna Iyer General Editor Abhinandan Malik BA, LL B (Hons) (NALSAR), LL M (Univ. of Toronto) Justice at Heart Life Journey of Justice V.R. Krishna Iyer Salman Khurshid BA (Hons) Delhi, MA (Oxon), BCL Senior Advocate, Supreme Court of India & Former Union Minister of Law & Justice and External Affairs Dr Lokendra Malik LL B, LL M, Ph D, LL D (NLS Bangalore) Advocate, Supreme Court of India with a Foreword by P.P. R ao Senior Advocate Supreme Court of India Eastern Book Company Lucknow EASTERN BOOK COMPANY Website: www.ebc.co.in, E-mail: [email protected] Lucknow (H.O.): 34, Lalbagh, Lucknow-226 001 Phones: +91–522–4033600 (30 lines), Fax: +91–522–4033633 New Delhi: 5–B, Atma Ram House, 5th Floor 1, Tolstoy Marg, Connaught Place, New Delhi-110 001 Phones: +91–11–45752323, +91–9871197119, Fax: +91–11–41504440 Delhi: 1267, Kashmere Gate, Old Hindu College Building, Delhi-110 006 Phones: +91–11–23917616, +91–9313080904, Fax: +91–11–23921656 Bangalore: 25/1, Anand Nivas, 3rd Cross, 6th Main, Gandhinagar, Bangalore-560 009, Phone: +91–80–41225368 Allahabad: Manav Law House, Near Prithvi Garden Opp. Dr. Chandra’s Eye Clinic, Elgin Road, Civil Lines, Allahabad-211 001 Phones: +91–532–2560710, 2422023, Fax: +91–532–2623584 Ahmedabad: Satyamev Complex-1, Ground Floor, Shop No. 7 Opp. High Court Gate No. 2 (Golden Jubilee Gate) Sarkhej — Gandhinagar Highway Road, Sola, Ahmedabad-380 060 Phones: +91–532–2560710, 2422023, Fax: +91–532–2623584 Nagpur: F–9, Girish Heights, Near LIC Square, Kamptee Road, Nagpur-440 001 Phones: +91–712–6607650, +91–7028924969 www.facebook.com/easternbookcompany www.twiter.com/ebcindia Shop online at: www.ebcwebstore.com First Edition, 2016 ` 595.00 [Paperback] All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • A Rare Judge
    A Rare Judge —P. P. R ao* I. EARLY YEARS AND ELEVATION I was a student of law when I first heard his name. He was then the Minister for Law, Home, Prisons etc. in the State of Kerala, in the first ever Communist Government led by Mr. E.M.S Namboodiripad. He was a bril- liant man with strikingly original ideas and a crusader committed to the wel- fare of the common man. In due course, his name became more and more familiar and his subsequent career as a Judge of the Kerala High Court, Member of the Law Commission of India and Judge of the Supreme Court of India is well known. It was only in 1973 after his elevation to the Bench of the Apex court that I came to know Justice Krishna Iyer in a personal capacity. II. THE APPOINTMENT CONTROVERSY His elevation to the Supreme Court took place within a few months of Justice A.N. Ray’s appointment as Chief Justice of India, superseding three senior most Judges. The entire Bar of India was up in arms against the supersession of Judges following the momentous decision in the Kesavananda Bharati case,1 curtailing the power of Parliament to amend the basic struc- ture of the Constitution. After Justice Iyer had moved to Delhi as a member of the Union Law Commission, his friends and admirers started pressing for his elevation to the Apex court. Chief Justice S.M. Sikri and a section of the Bombay Bar were against the move due to his political antecedents, includ- ing his Minister-ship in the Communist Government.2 Amidst the vehement * Senior Advocate, Supreme Court, assisted by Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Padma Vibhushan * * the Padma Vibhushan Is the Second-Highest Civilian Award of the Republic of India , Proceeded by Bharat Ratna and Followed by Padma Bhushan
    TRY -- TRUE -- TRUST NUMBER ONE SITE FOR COMPETITIVE EXAM SELF LEARNING AT ANY TIME ANY WHERE * * Padma Vibhushan * * The Padma Vibhushan is the second-highest civilian award of the Republic of India , proceeded by Bharat Ratna and followed by Padma Bhushan . Instituted on 2 January 1954, the award is given for "exceptional and distinguished service", without distinction of race, occupation & position. Year Recipient Field State / Country Satyendra Nath Bose Literature & Education West Bengal Nandalal Bose Arts West Bengal Zakir Husain Public Affairs Andhra Pradesh 1954 Balasaheb Gangadhar Kher Public Affairs Maharashtra V. K. Krishna Menon Public Affairs Kerala Jigme Dorji Wangchuck Public Affairs Bhutan Dhondo Keshav Karve Literature & Education Maharashtra 1955 J. R. D. Tata Trade & Industry Maharashtra Fazal Ali Public Affairs Bihar 1956 Jankibai Bajaj Social Work Madhya Pradesh Chandulal Madhavlal Trivedi Public Affairs Madhya Pradesh Ghanshyam Das Birla Trade & Industry Rajashtan 1957 Sri Prakasa Public Affairs Andhra Pradesh M. C. Setalvad Public Affairs Maharashtra John Mathai Literature & Education Kerala 1959 Gaganvihari Lallubhai Mehta Social Work Maharashtra Radhabinod Pal Public Affairs West Bengal 1960 Naryana Raghvan Pillai Public Affairs Tamil Nadu H. V. R. Iyengar Civil Service Tamil Nadu 1962 Padmaja Naidu Public Affairs Andhra Pradesh Vijaya Lakshmi Pandit Civil Service Uttar Pradesh A. Lakshmanaswami Mudaliar Medicine Tamil Nadu 1963 Hari Vinayak Pataskar Public Affairs Maharashtra Suniti Kumar Chatterji Literature
    [Show full text]
  • In the Supreme Court of India
    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Criminal Appeal Nos. 279, 355, 356, 380, 389, 1845-1849 and 1926 of 1975 and 3, 41 and 46 of 1976 Decided On: 28.04.1976 Appellants: Additional District Magistrate, Jabalpur Vs. Respondent: Shivakant Shukla AND Appellants: State of Uttar Pradesh Vs. Respondent: V.K.S. Chaudhary and Ors. AND Appellants: Union of India (UOI) Vs. Respondent: Atal Bihari Vajpayee and Ors. AND Appellants: Union of India (UOI) Vs. Respondent: Satya Sharma and Anr. AND Appellants: State of Karnataka and Ors. Vs. Respondent: N.K. Ganpaiah and Anr. AND Appellants: State of Maharashtra and Ors. Vs. Respondent: Subhas and Ors. AND Appellants: State of Rajasthan and Ors. Vs. Respondent: Milap Chand Kanungo and Ors. AND Appellants: Union of India (UOI) and Anr. Vs. Respondent: Shri Ram Dhan AND Appellants: Union of India (UOI) Vs. Respondent: Dr. Mrs. Rekha Awasthi Hon'ble Judges: A.N. Ray, C.J., H.R. Khanna, M.H. Beg, P.N. Bhagwati and Y.V. Chandrachud, JJ. Counsels: For Appellant/Petitioner/Plaintiff: M.C. Nihalani, Ram Punjwani, S.N. Kakkar, Niren De and V.P. Raman, Advs. For Respondents/Defendant: Shanti Bhushan, Soli Sorabjee, G.C. Dwivedi, S.S. Khanduja, Rama Joise and N.M. Ghatate, Advs. For Applicant-Interveners: Manek Ben, Maharaj Jai Singh, Surinder Mohan, Suraj Bhan Gupta, V.k. Singh Chowdhary and Deepchand Jain, Advs. Acts/Rules/Orders: Maintenance of Internal Security Act, 1971 - Sections 3, 3(1), 8, 16, 16A, 16A(9) and 18; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 21, 22, 31, 31(1), 32, 133, 134, 136, 141, 226, 265, 352, 352(1) and (3), 358, 359, 359(1) and (1A) and 368; Indian Evidence Act - Sections 123, 124 and 162; Civil Procedure Code, 1908 - Sections 3 and 80 - Order XXXV, Rule 12; Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 76, 79 and 342; Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Sections 56, 57, 167, 419 and 419(1)Constitution of India (Thirty-eighth Amendment) Act; Constitution of India (Thirty-ninth Amendment) Act; Presidential Order Cases Referred: Poona Municipal Corpn.
    [Show full text]
  • GK Digest for SSC CGL V2  455: Accession of Skandagupta
    Index- GK Digest for SSC CGL319–320 v2: Commencement of Gupta era. Subject - History - Page No : 1-19 380: Accession of Chandragupta II Subject - Geography - Page No : 19-28 ‘Vikramaditya’ Subject - General Science - Page No : 28-78 405–411: Visit of Chinese traveller Fahien. 415: Accession of Kumargupta I. GK Digest for SSC CGL v2 455: Accession of Skandagupta. 606–647: Harshavardhan’s reign. SUBJECT - HISTORY II. MEDIEVAL PERIOD Indian History – Important Dates BC ( BEFORE CRIST ) 712: First invasion in Sindh by Arabs (Mohd. 2300–1750 : Indus Valley Civilization. Bin Qasim). From 1500 : Coming of the Aryans. 836: Accession of King Bhoja of Kannauj. 1200–800 : Expansion of the Aryans in the 985: Accession of Rajaraja, the Chola ruler. Ganga Valley. 998: Accession of SultanMahmud Ghazni. 600 :Age of the 16 Mahajanapadas of 1001: First invasion of India by Mahmud northern India. Ghazni who defeated Jaipal, ruler of Punjab. 563–483: Buddha’s Life-span. BankExamsToday.com 1025: Destruction of Somnath Temple by 540–468: Mahavir’s Life-span. Mahmud Ghazni. 362–321: Nanda dynasty. 1191: First battle of Tarain. 327–326 : Alexander’s invasion of India. It 1192: Second battle of Tarain. opened a land route between India and 1206 :Accession of Qutubuddin Aibak to the Europe. throne of Delhi. 322: Accession of Chandragupta Maurya. 1210 :Death of Qutubuddin Aibak. 305: Defeat of Seleucus at the hands of 1221: Chengiz Khan invaded India (Mongol Chandragupta Maurya. invasion). 273–232: Ashoka’s reign. 1236: Accession of Razia Sultana to the 261: Conquest of Kalinga. throne of Delhi. 145–101: Regin of Elara, the Chola king of 1240: Death of Razia Sultana.
    [Show full text]
  • VOLUME XXIII, NO. 4 October, 1977 the JOURNAL of PARLIAMENTARY INFORMATION
    VOLUME XXIII, NO. 4 October, 1977 THE JOURNAL OF PARLIAMENTARY INFORMATION Vol. XXIII NO.4 October-December, 1977 CONTENTS PAGE 'EDITORIAL NOTE 541 ,ARTICLES President Neelam Sanjiva Reddy 543 The Committee on Petitions .. 547 -H.V. Kamath The House of Lords and th: European Parliament. 55I -Sir Peter Henderson -PARLIAMENTARY EVENTS AND ACTIVITIES Foreign Parliamentary Delegations in India 558 PRIVILEGE ISSUES 560 PROCEDURAL MATTERS 568 PARLIAMENTARY AND CoNSTITIJTIONAL DEVELOPMENTS 574 DOCUMENTS OP CoNSTITUTIONAL AND PARLIAMENTARY INTEREST The Salary and Allowances of Leaders of Opposition in Parliament Act, 1977 595 :SESSIONAL REVIEW Lok Sabha . 600 Rajya Sabha . 608 State Legislatures 618 1300K REVIEWS S. N. Jain : Administrative Tribunals in India: Existing and Proposed . 620 -K. B. Asthana B. L. Tomlinson : The Indian N at"onal Congress and the Raj 622 -N.C. Parashar RECENT LITERATURE OP PARLIAMENTARY INTEREST 627 PAGE, ApPENDICES I. Statement showing the work transacted during the Second Session of the Sixth Lok Sabha 635- II. Statement showing the work transacted during the Hun- dred and Second Session of Rajya Sabha 640' III. Statement showing the activities of State Legislatures during the period April 1 to June 30, 1977 644- IV. Bills passed by the Houses of Parliament and assented to by the President during the period May I, 1977 to July 31, 1977 ~g V. Bills passed by the State Legislatures during the period April I to June 30, 1977 649' VI. Ordinances issued by the Central Government during the period May 1 to July 31, 1977 and by the State Governments during the period April 1 to June 30, 1977 652 .
    [Show full text]
  • Institute of Distance and Open Learning Gauhati University
    PS-05-VII (1) Institute of Distance and Open Learning Gauhati University MA in Political Science (2nd Semester) Paper VII Politics in India II Block 1 Judicial System in India Contents: Block Introduction– Unit 1 : Constitutional Provision of Judicial System in India Unit 2 : Judicial Review and Judicial Activism Unit 3 : Tension between Judiciary and the Legislature (1) Contributors: Rashmi Rekha Sarma Research Scholar, Dept. of Political Science (Units 1, 2 & 3) Gauhati University Course Co-ordination Dr. Kandarpa Das : Director IDOL,GU Barnalee Choudhury : Lecturer in Political Science IDOL, GU Editorial Team Content Editing : Dr. Dhruba Pratim Sarma Senior Lecturer, Dept. of Political Science Gauhati University Format Editing : Dipankar Saikia Guest Lecturer in Political Science IDOL, GU Language Editing : Shanghamitra De Lecturer in English IDOL, GU Cover Page Designing: Kaushik Sarma : Graphic Designer CET, IITG February, 2011 © Institute of Distance and Open Learning, Gauhati University. All rights reserved. No part of this work may be reproduced in any form, by mimeograph or any other means, without permission in writing from the Institute of Distance and Open Learning, Gauhati University. Further information about the Institute of Distance and Open Learning, Gauhati University courses may be obtained from the University's office at IDOL Building, Gauhati University, Guwahati-14. Published on behalf of the Institute of Distance and Open Learning, Gauhati University by Dr. Kandarpa Das, Director and printed at Maliyata Offset Press, Mirza. Copies printed 1000. Acknowledgement The Institute of Distance and Open Learning, Gauhati University duly acknowledges the financial assistance from the Distance Education Council, IGNOU, New Delhi for preparation of this material.
    [Show full text]
  • Raj: Pilot's Flying Cut Short
    WWW.YUGMARG.COM FOLLOW US ON REGD NO. CHD/0061/2006-08 | RNI NO. 61323/95 Join us at telegram https://t.me/yugmarg Wednesday, July 15, 2020 CHANDIGARH, VOL. XXV, NO. 159, PAGES 12, RS. 2 YOUR REGION, YOUR PAPER Govt to open youth Himachal Chief Shabad Gayan Why Saurav club in villages to Minister Jai Ram competitions Ganguly better dedicates projects dedicated to 400th boost spirit of than MS Dhoni, worth birth anniversary explains cooperation: Rs 73 crore for of Guru Tegh Gautam Gambhir Sandeep Banjar area Bahadur held PAGE 3 PAGE 5 PAGE 6 PAGE 12 Raj: Pilot’s flying cut short Nitin Gadkari lays foundation of new economic corridor projects in Hry Manohar lal demands legitimate share of SYL water NEERAJ SHARMA Sacked as deputy CM, CHANDIGARH, JULY 14 Union Minister for Road Transport, Highways and MSMEs Nitin Gadkari inaugurated and laid the foundation stones of various Highway projects as part of a new economic corridor worth removed as Cong chief about Rs 20 thousand crore in Haryana today through webcast. The function was presided over by the Chief Minis- AGENCY ter of Haryana Manohar Lal. Haryana JAIPUR, JUL 14 Chief Minister, Manohar Lal has also sought his intervention in resolving the The Congress on Tuesday sacked Sachin long-pending issue with neighbouring Pilot from the posts of Rajasthan's deputy State of Punjab regarding Sutlej Yamu- chief minister and the party's state unit na Link (SYL) Canal so that Haryana chief. Cracking the whip on the rebel par- could get its legitimate share of river projects will also save on time, fuels should consider adopting crops for bio ty leader, the party also removed his loy- water.
    [Show full text]